- 1Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China
- 2Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group, Co. Ltd, Yili Maternal and Infant Nutrition Institute (YMINI), Beijing, China
- 3Inner Mongolia Dairy Technology Research Institute Co. Ltd, Hohhot, China
- 4National Center of Technology Innovation for Dairy, Hohhot, China
- 5College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
- 6Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of the Traditional Chinese Medicine Agricultural Biogenomics, Changsha Medical University, Hunan, Changsha, China
by Bai, M., Liu, H., Yan, Y., Duan, S., Szeto, I. M.-Y., He, J., Hu, J., Fu, Y., Xu, K., and Xiong, X. (2024). Front. Nutr. 11:1439110. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1439110
There was a mistake in Figure 3 as published. The image of RB41 was duplicated with the image of Rubrobacter. The corrected Figure 3 appears below.
Figure 3. Effect of different formula treatments on colonic microbiota diversity and composition in pigs. (A) A Venn diagram illustrating the overlaps of OTUs in the gut microbiota. (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). (D) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis. (C) Unweighted unifrac cluster tree based on Unweighted Pair-group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) analysis. (D) The microbial alpha diversity index (Observed-species, Chao1, Shannon, Simpson, ACE) were calculated using the mother program. (E) Relative contribution of the top 10 phylum in each group (left) and the relative abundance of significantly different microorganisms (right). (F) The relative contribution of the top 35 genera in each group (left) and the relative abundance of significantly different microorganisms (right). BF, basal infant formula; SF, standard premature infant formula; HF, hydrolyzed protein formula. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Generative AI statement
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: prematurity or low birth weight, hydrolyzed protein formula, amino acid metabolism, intestinal development, gut microbiota
Citation: Bai M, Liu H, Yan Y, Duan S, Szeto I-Y, He J, Hu J, Fu Y, Xu K and Xiong X (2026) Correction: Hydrolyzed protein formula improves the nutritional tolerance by increasing intestinal development and altering cecal microbiota in low-birth-weight piglets. Front. Nutr. 12:1755514. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1755514
Received: 27 November 2025; Accepted: 09 December 2025;
Published: 12 January 2026.
Edited and reviewed by: Pauline M. Anton, UniLaSalle, France
Copyright © 2026 Bai, Liu, Yan, Duan, Szeto, He, Hu, Fu, Xu and Xiong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hongnan Liu, bGl1aG5AaXNhLmFjLmNu; Yalu Yan, eWFueWFsdUB5aWxpLmNvbQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Ignatius Man-Yau Szeto2,3,4