Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

This article is part of the Research TopicNutrition-Related Clinical Laboratory Indicators: Enhancing Precision Medicine in Disease ManagementView all 4 articles

Association of Fat Quality Index with Head and Neck Cancer Risk: Results from a prospective study

Provisionally accepted
Ziyao  ZengZiyao Zeng1Linghai  ZengLinghai Zeng2*Yi  XiaoYi Xiao3Yahui  JiangYahui Jiang4Yuxiang  LuoYuxiang Luo5Linglong  PengLinglong Peng4Yaxu  WangYaxu Wang4Yunhao  TangYunhao Tang6*
  • 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, China
  • 2Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 3Chongqing Medical University Centre for Lipid Research, Chongqing, China
  • 4Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 5Thorax, center, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • 6Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background As head and neck cancer (HNC) incidence rises, prevention demands attention to diet. Yet most studies emphasize total fat intake while overlooking fat quality. To address this gap, we examined the association between Fat Quality Index (FQI) and HNC risk. Methods A total of 98,560 participants were included in this study. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs for overall HNC were estimated using multivariable Cox models. Site-specific analyses were conducted, and fatty-acid components were evaluated. Effect modification was tested across prespecified subgroups. A joint analysis combined FQI tertiles with percent energy from fat. Robustness was assessed through multiple sensitivity analyses. Results Over a median 8.8 years, 267 HNC cases occurred. Higher FQI significantly reduced overall HNC risk (fully adjusted HR for Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1: 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42–0.91; P-trend=0.011), demonstrating a linear inverse dose-response. Findings were consistent across subgroups and sensitivity analyses. By subsite, associations were strongest for laryngeal cancer (HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.21–0.88). The joint analysis revealed that higher FQI was associated with lower HNC risk even among individuals with high total fat intake (HR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.21–0.59), with no significant interaction observed. Higher Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) intakes were inversely associated with HNC, whereas Saturated fatty acids (SFA) and Trans fatty acids (TFA) were not. Conclusions Higher FQI is associated with lower HNC incidence, independent of total fat intake. These findings highlight that prioritizing dietary fat quality over quantity may be a critical strategy for HNC primary prevention.

Keywords: cancer prevention, Epidemiology, Fat quality index, head and neck cancer, prospective cohort study

Received: 09 Nov 2025; Accepted: 27 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Zeng, Zeng, Xiao, Jiang, Luo, Peng, Wang and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Linghai Zeng
Yunhao Tang

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.