- 1Applied Optics Beijing Area Major Laboratory, Department of Physics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Mutisale Spin Physics, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
The nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation based on the geometric phase is robust against the built-in noise and decoherence. In this work, we theoretically propose a scheme to realize nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates in a surface electron system, which is a promising two-dimensional platform for quantum computation. The holonomic gate is realized by a three-level structure that combines the Rydberg states and spin states via an inhomogeneous magnetic field. After a cyclic evolution, the computation bases pick up different geometric phases and thus perform a holonomic gate. Only the electron with spin up experiences the holonomic gate, while the electron with spin down is decoupled from the state-selective driving fields. The arbitrary controlled-U gate encoded on the Rydberg states and spin states can then be realized. The fidelity of the output state exceeds 0.99 with experimentally achievable parameters.
1 Introduction
The quantum geometric phase is a very important resource for quantum computation [1–5]. Quantum gates based on the geometric phase are robust against the disturbance of the dynamic process owing to their global geometric properties [6]. The adiabatic holonomic quantum computation (AHQC) realizes high-fidelity quantum gates via the geometric phase in an adiabatic evolution [7–15]. The AHQC protocol is solely determined by the solid angle of the cyclic evolution in the parameter space, and thus is robust against small perturbations of the evolution path. However, the adiabatic condition [16] of AHQC requires a long evolution time, which accumulates considerable decoherence. Thus, the nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation (NHQC) was proposed [17–28]. The NHQC preserves the computational universality of the AHQC but does not require the adiabatic condition, and thus has attracted broad interest in recent years [29–45].
On the other hand, the electron on the surface of liquid helium provides a controllable two-dimensional (2D) quantum system, where the surface electron (SE) is attracted by the induced image charge inside the liquid helium and concurrently repulsed by the helium atoms. The confinement perpendicular to the surface leads to a hydrogen-like spectrum which can be used in quantum simulation [46, 47] and quantum information tasks [48, 49]. Meanwhile, the motion parallel to the surface is free of defects and impurities, thus the SE forms a perfect 2D electron system which is widely observed in semiconductor devices [50]. The SE can be manipulated by the circuit QED architecture [51, 52] or the microchannel devices [53–59] with high transport efficiency [60, 61]. With a static magnetic field perpendicular to the surface, the motion parallel to the surface is quantized as orbital states [62], which is similar to the Landau levels. In addition, the spin state of the SE is also an important quantum resource owing to its long relaxation time that exceeds 100 s [63]. Both the Rydberg and orbital states can be coupled to the spin states of electrons [64, 65]. Recent works [66, 67] show a practical method to couple the Rydberg state with the spin state using a local inhomogeneous magnetic field, where the electrons with different expected positions experience different magnetic fields depending on their Rydberg state. The Rydberg states of SE can probably realize large-scale quantum computation owing to the long-range dipole-dipole interaction of adjacent electrons [67], while the spin states may be valuable for quantum memory because of their long lifetime.
In the past, research on the SE has mainly focused on exploring the physical properties, while the efficient quantum gates based on the SE still require further investigation. Therefore, in this work, we propose a scheme to realize the nonadiabatic holonomic gates on both the spin states and Rydberg states of a single SE. We first propose an arbitrary single-qubit holonomic gate on the Rydberg state of the SE, which is realized by a three-level structure driven by time-dependent microwave pulses. During the cyclic evolution, two orthogonal bases pick up different geometric phases. The universal single-qubit holonomic gate is realized by varying the complex ratio between the Rabi frequencies of the two driving fields. Then we introduce an inhomogeneous magnetic field through a magnetized ferromagnetic electrode. The Rydberg states with different expected positions experience different magnetic fields, and thus their Zeeman energy splittings are different. By applying the state-selective pulses, three Rydberg states with spin up are coupled with the driving fields, while the Rydberg states with spin down are decoupled. An arbitrary holonomic single-qubit gate U is applied on the three coupled states, while the three decoupled states remain unchanged. In this way, the holonomic controlled-U gate of the Rydberg and spin states is achieved. Owing to the global geometric properties, the NHQC gates are not sensitive to the fluctuation of the pulse duration. Because the adiabatic condition is not required during the evolution, the fast manipulation makes the scheme robust against dissipation. Our theoretical scheme is based on the experimental configuration, and the parameters are experimentally achievable.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the basic model of the SE in the external magnetic and electric fields and the method to realize holonomic gates. In Section 3, we present the fidelity of the scheme. Finally, we conclude the work and give a prospect in Section 4.
2 Model and methods
2.1 Basic model of the surface electron
Our theoretical proposal is based on the electron above liquid helium. The electron is trapped by the external electric field provided by electrodes [67]. As shown in Figure 1, a pillar electrode with positive voltage and an annular electrode with negative voltage are embedded in the liquid helium. These electrodes apply an electric holding field with the cylindrically symmetric electric potential V(r, z), where z is the vertical coordinate and
where ωc = eB0/me is the cyclotron frequency, me is the mass of the electron, and Lz is the angular momentum along z-direction, i.e.,
where pα and α are the momentum and position of the electron (α = x, y, z), and ϕ is the azimuthal coordinate in the xOy-plane. The vertical and radial motion of the electron is determined by
where m is an integer. Because of the cylindrical symmetry, the wavefunction can be expressed as
where
FIGURE 1. (A) The longitudinal section of the proposed model. A central pillar electrode (orange) with a positive voltage of 60 mV and an annular electrode (dark gray) with a negative voltage of −45 mV are embedded in the liquid helium. The SE floats above the liquid surface. The vertical motion of the SE is quantized as the Rydberg states owing to the image potential and the electric field applied by the electrodes. A uniform static magnetic field B0 is perpendicularly applied to the surface. The center electrode is made of ferromagnetic material and induces an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The total magnetic field is B. The motion in the xOy plane is quantized as the Landau level induced by the vertical magnetic field and the cylindrically symmetric electric potential. (B) The top view of the architecture. The electrodes are arranged in an array, with one electron in each unit. Because the energy levels of each electron can be independently tuned by the voltage of electrodes, the driving field can be resonant with only one electron at a time. The adjacent electrons can be coupled by the dipole-dipole interaction of the Rydberg states. (C) The quantum information can be stored in the spin states and manipulated in large-scaled quantum computation via the Rydberg states.
The vertical motion of the SE is quantized by the Rydberg state labeled by nz. The expected positions of the lowest three states along the z direction are 7.63 nm, 17.2 nm, and 25.3 nm, which are derived from the numerical solution of the wavefunction, cf. the Supplementary Material. An inhomogeneous magnetic field is induced by the center electrode which is made of ferromagnetic material. The electrons with different nz have different expected positions ⟨z⟩, and thus experience different magnetic fields. The differences of the magnetic field ΔB at the expected positions with nz = 1, 2, 3 are on the order of several mT. The corresponding difference of the Zeeman energy gμBΔB/h is about hundreds of GHz, where g is the Lande g factor and μB = eℏ/(2me) is the Bohr magneton. This energy difference is much larger than the decay rates of the Rydberg states, cf. the Supplementary Material, and plays a significant role in the following controlled-U gate scheme.
2.2 Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates based on the Rydberg states and spin states
At first, we will demonstrate the proposal to realize a single-qubit gate in the subspace of a specific spin state, that is, the subspace spanned by {|↑, nz⟩} (nz = 1, 2, 3). As we have mentioned in Section 2.1, the Rydberg states with larger quantum number nz are further away from the liquid surface, and thus experience different magnetic fields. Since the Zeeman energy of the spin state is determined by the inhomogeneous magnetic field, the Zeeman energies of different Rydberg states are different. The magnetic field experienced by state |nz⟩ is
Hereafter, we assume ℏ = 1 for simplicity. Ω(t) represents the shape of the driving pulse. The duration of the driving pulse can be very short because the adiabatic condition is not required during the evolution. A specific pulse shape is not strictly required for NHQC, but the integral over time needs to be π, i.e.,
FIGURE 2. (A) Schematic diagram of the nonadiabatic holonomic gate. Two driving pulses are resonant with |↑, nz = 1⟩ ⇔|↑, nz = 3⟩ and |↑, nz = 2⟩ ⇔|↑, nz = 3⟩, respectively. The driving pulses are off-resonant with the transition frequencies of the spin-down states due to the large detuning δ13 and δ23. (B) The evolutions of the instantaneous orthogonal bases |D(t)⟩ and |B(t)⟩ on the Bloch spheres. The dark state |D(t)⟩ remains unchanged, while |B(t)⟩ evolves along the longitude circle and acquires a geometric phase.
The eigenenergies of HI are 0, ± Ω. The corresponding eigenstates are
Where |d⟩ ≡ cos(θ/2)|↑, 1⟩ + sin(θ/2)eiφ|↑, 2⟩ is the dark state, |b⟩ ≡ sin(θ/2)e−iφ|↑, 1⟩ − cos(θ/2)|↑, 2⟩ is the bright state, and |a⟩ = |↑, 3⟩ is the intermediate state. The dark state does not evolve with time because the corresponding eigenenergy is zero. Thus, we define
where
is the evolution operator of HI, and
where
By choosing α(τ) = π at the final time τ, |ξ1(τ)⟩ = |ξ1(0)⟩ = |↑, 1⟩ and |ξ2(τ)⟩ = |ξ2(0)⟩ = |↑, 2⟩, i.e., |ξ1(t)⟩ and |ξ2(t)⟩ coincide with the computation bases |↑, 1⟩ and |↑, 2⟩ both at the beginning and end of time. It can be easily verified that the parallel transport condition ⟨ξ1(t)|HI(t)|ξ2(t)⟩ = 0 is satisfied during the whole evolution t ∈ [0, τ]. Thus, the dynamic phases vanish and the evolution operator U(τ) in the subspace spanned by |↑, 1⟩ and |↑, 2⟩ is [19, 29]
where n = (sin θ cos φ, sin θ sin φ, cos θ), σ = (σx, σy, σz) are the Pauli operators, and the connection matrix
whose matrix elements are determined by
Therefore, a single-qubit holonomic gate on the coupled Rydberg states is realized by adjusting the complex ratio tan(θ/2)eiφ between the Rabi frequencies of the two driving fields. For example, a Hadamard gate H is realized by (θ, φ) = (π/4, 0), and a NOT gate X is realized by (θ, φ) = (π/2, 0). In addition, two sequential holonomic gates lead to
which forms an arbitrary SU(2) transformation that rotates the state around the axis n ×m by the angle 2 arccos(n ⋅m) [19, 68]. For instance, the π/8 phase gate [68] is realized by two sequential gates with (θ, φ) = (π/2, 0) and (θ, φ) = (π/2, π/8).
Next, we will demonstrate the two-qubit gate proposal by taking two spin states into account. As shown in Figure 2A, the Rydberg states with spin down are off-resonant with the driving fields. Thus, the subspace spanned by {|↓, nz⟩} (nz = 1, 2, 3) is decoupled with the driving fields. The total evolution operator in the subspace spanned by {|↓, 1⟩, |↓, 2⟩, |↑, 1⟩, |↑, 2⟩} is
where U is the single-qubit gate on the Rydberg states according to Eq. 14. In this way, the holonomic controlled-U gate with the spin state being the control qubit is realized. In addition, according to Eq. 17, by applying two controlled gate sequentially, we can realize an arbitrary controlled-U gate. For example, by choosing (θ, φ) = (π/2, 0), U = X and a CNOT gate is realized as
where I and X are the identity operator and qubit-flip operator in the subspace spanned by {|nz = 1⟩, |nz = 2⟩}, respectively. The Rydberg states flip only if the spin state is |↑⟩. Similarly, by choosing (θ, φ) = (0, 0), U = Z and a controlled phase (CZ) gate is achieved.
In the presence of dissipation, the evolution of the system can be described by the quantum master equation [69]
where the Lindblad operator is
where {A, B} = AB+ BA is the anti-commutator, Cmn = |m⟩⟨n| is the collapse operator with the corresponding decay rate κmn. It is noteworthy that κmn increases with the electric holding field E⊥ induced by the electrodes, cf. the Supplementary Material. For typical experimental configuration, E⊥ is on the order of 100 ∼ 1000 V/cm [70]. Hereafter the evolution with dissipation is solved by QuTiP [71, 72].
3 Results
The state fidelity F between the final state ρ(t) and the ideal target state ρi is defined as [68]
In Table 1, we present the fidelity of the CNOT gate with typical initial states under the influence of dissipation. While in Table 2, we present the fidelity of the controlled-phase (CZ) gate. The decay rates are calculated under a typical electric holding field E⊥ = 100 V/cm [73]. Because the adiabatic condition is not required during the evolution, the evolving time can be very short. For the typical microwave driving with Rabi frequency ΩR/2π = 40 MHz [50, 73], we use the Gaussian driving pulse with the duration T = 2π/ΩR = 25 ns and the standard deviation σ = T/8. The full width at half maxima (FWHM) is
TABLE 1. The output-state fidelity of the CNOT gate under typical input states. The decay rates are calculated under a typical electric holding field E⊥ = 100 V/cm, which are κ21 = 1.95 MHz, κ32 = 0.22 MHz, and κ31 = 1.69 MHz.
TABLE 2. The output-state fidelity of the CZ gate under typical input states. The decay rates are the same as Table 1.
It is noteworthy that the CNOT gate can generate an entangled state from a product state. Thus, we present the time evolution of the initial product state
FIGURE 3. Time evolution of the state ρ(t) under the CNOT gate with the initial state
FIGURE 4. (A) Real and (B) imaginary part of the density matrix of the output state from the initial state
Generally the electric holding field E⊥ is applied to the experimental system in order to confine the motion of electrons and tune the energy spacing between the Rydberg states. E⊥ is on the order of 100 ∼ 1000 V/cm for typical experimental configuration [70]. Because κmn increases with E⊥, we investigate the fidelity with initial state
As for the single-qubit gate, we can apply four resonant drivings with frequencies being respectively ω13, ω23, ω13 + δ13, and ω23 + δ23, and simultaneously perform two NHQC gates in the spin up and spin down subspace, as shown in Figure 6. In this way, a single-qubit gate on the Rydberg state is performed, i.e.,
where U is the single-qubit operation in Eq. 14 and I is the identity operator. This proposal still works when the driving pulses ω13, ω23 and ω13 + δ13, ω23 + δ23 are not applied simultaneously. In Table 3 we present the average output-state fidelity of the single-qubit NOT gate and Hadamard gate. The “non-simultaneous case” implies that the driving pulses with frequencies ω13 + δ13 and ω23 + δ23 are applied T/4 later than the driving pulses with frequencies ω13 and ω23. The state fidelity is obtained by the following procedures. We begin with the initial state
FIGURE 6. The transition frequencies between different energy levels. In the single-qubit gate proposal, we apply four resonant drivings with frequencies being respectively ω13, ω23, ω13 + δ13, and ω23 + δ23. In the controlled gate proposal which regards the Rydberg states as the control qubit, one resonant driving with frequency being ωZ2 is applied.
TABLE 3. Average output-state fidelity of the single-qubit gates in the simultaneous case and non-simultaneous case. The decay rates are the same as Table 1.
4 Conclusion and remarks
In this work, we present a scheme to realize nonadiabatic holonomic gates in an SE system based on the experimental configuration [67]. By applying the state-selective pulses, three Rydberg states with spin up are coupled with driving fields. During the evolution, two orthogonal bases acquire different geometric phases and thus perform a geometric gate. By varying the complex ratio between the Rabi frequencies of the two driving fields, the universal single-qubit nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gate is realized. The controlled-U gate on the Rydberg and spin states is based on the different Zeeman energy splittings in the inhomogeneous magnetic field. With the state-selective driving pulses we perform an arbitrary single-qubit gate U on the Rydberg states with spin up while the Rydberg states with spin down remain unchanged.
It is noteworthy that we can also realize controlled-U gates considering the Rydberg states as the control qubit. As shown in Figure 6, the electron-spin-resonance frequencies of |nz = 1⟩ and |nz = 2⟩ are ωZ1 and ωZ2, respectively. Because the magnetic field at the expected positions of |nz = 1⟩ and |nz = 2⟩ are different, the difference between ωZ1 and ωZ2 is δ12 = ωZ1 − ωZ2 = gμB(B(1) − B(2)). δ12 is on the order of several hundreds MHz, which is much larger than the decay rate
Because of the fast nonadiabatic evolution, the NHQC proposal is robust against dissipation. Our theoretical scheme is based on the experimental configuration, and the parameters are experimentally achievable. Therefore, this work will supply heuristic insight for fast-manipulation tasks of holonomic quantum computation that involve both the Rydberg and spin states of the SE.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
JW: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing, Visualization. W-TH: Methodology, Writing–original draft. H-BW: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing–review and editing, Validation. QA: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing–review and editing, Validation.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. H-BW is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61675028 and the Interdiscipline Research Funds of Beijing Normal University. QA is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality under Grant No. 1202017 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos 11674033, 11505007, and Beijing Normal University under Grant No. 2022129.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2024.1348804/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Simon B. Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase. Phys Rev Lett (1983) 51:2167–70. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2167
2. Berry MV. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc R Soc Lond (1984) 392:45. doi:10.1098/rspa.1984.0023
3. Leek PJ, Fink JM, Blais A, Bianchetti R, Göppl M, Gambetta JM, et al. Observation of Berry’s phase in a solid-state qubit. Science (2007) 318:1889–92. doi:10.1126/science.1149858
4. Ai Q, Huo WY, Long GL, Sun CP. Nonadiabatic fluctuation in the measured geometric phase. Phys Rev A (2009) 80:024101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.024101
5. Chitambar E, Gour G. Quantum resource theories. Rev Mod Phys (2019) 91:025001. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.025001
6. Zhang J, Kyaw TH, Filipp S, Kwek LC, Sjöqvist D, Tong DM. Geometric and holonomic quantum computation. Phys Rep (2023) 1027:1–53. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.07.004
7. Zanardi P, Rasetti M. Holonomic quantum computation. Phys Lett A (1999) 264:94–9. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00803-8
8. Osterloh A, Amico L, Falci G, Fazio R. Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition. Nature (2002) 416:608–10. doi:10.1038/416608a
9. Faoro L, Siewert J, Fazio R. Non-Abelian holonomies, charge pumping, and quantum computation with josephson junctions. Phys Rev Lett (2003) 90:028301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.028301
10. Duan LM, Cirac JI, Zoller P. Geometric manipulation of trapped ions for quantum computation. Science (2001) 292:1695–7. doi:10.1126/science.1058835
11. Solinas P, Zanardi P, Zanghì N, Rossi F. Semiconductor-based geometrical quantum gates. Phys Rev B (2003) 67:121307(R). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.67.121307
12. Tong DM, Sjöqvist E, Kwek LC, Oh CH. Kinematic approach to the mixed state geometric phase in nonunitary evolution. Phys Rev Lett (2004) 93:080405. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.080405
13. Yi XX, Wang LC, Zheng TY. Berry phase in a composite system. Phys Rev Lett (2004) 92:150406. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.150406
14. Song XK, Zhang H, Ai Q, Qiu J, Deng FG. Shortcuts to adiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspace with transitionless quantum driving algorithm. New J Phys (2016) 416:023001. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023001
15. Song XK, Ai Q, Qiu J, Deng FG. Physically feasible three-level transitionless quantum driving with multiple Schrödinger dynamics. Phys Rev A (2016) 93:052324. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.052324
16. Ivakhnenko OV, Shevchenko SN, Nori F. Nonadiabatic landau–zener–stückelberg–majorana transitions, dynamics, and interference. Phys Rep (2023) 995:1–89. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.10.002
17. Wang XB, Matsumoto K. Nonadiabatic conditional geometric phase shift with NMR. Phys Rev Lett (2001) 87:097901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.097901
18. Zhu SL, Wang ZD. Implementation of universal quantum gates based on nonadiabatic geometric phases. Phys Rev Lett (2002) 89:097902. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.097902
19. Sjöqvist E, Tong DM, Andersson LM, Hessmo B, Johansson M, Singh K. Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation. New J Phys (2012) 14:103035. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103035
20. Xu GF, Zhang J, Tong DM, Sjöqvist E, Kwek LC. Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces. Phys Rev Lett (2012) 109:170501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.170501
21. Xu GF, Long GL. Protecting geometric gates by dynamical decoupling. Phys Rev A (2014) 90:022323. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.022323
22. Xue ZY, Zhou J, Wang ZD. Universal holonomic quantum gates in decoherence-free subspace on superconducting circuits. Phys Rev A (2015) 92:022320. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022320
23. Xu GF, Liu CL, Zhao PZ, Tong DM. Nonadiabatic holonomic gates realized by a single-shot implementation. Phys Rev A (2015) 92:052302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052302
24. Zheng SB, Yang CP, Nori F. Comparison of the sensitivity to systematic errors between nonadiabatic non-Abelian geometric gates and their dynamical counterparts. Phys Rev A (2016) 93:032313. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032313
25. Xu GF, Zhao PZ, Tong DM, Sjöqvist E. Robust paths to realize nonadiabatic holonomic gates. Phys Rev A (2017) 95:052349. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.95.052349
26. Xue ZY, Gu FL, Hong ZP, Yang ZH, Zhang DW, Hu Y, et al. Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation with dressed-state qubits. Phys Rev Appl (2017) 7:054022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.054022
27. Chen SS, Zhang H, Song XK, Deng FG, Wang HB, Yang GJ. Universal single-qubit nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates on an optomechanical system. Ann Phys (Berlin) (2018) 530:1800239. doi:10.1002/andp.201800239
28. Jin ZY, Jing J. Geometric quantum gates via dark paths in Rydberg atoms. arXiv: 2307.07148 (2023).
29. Zu C, Wang WB, He L, Zhang WG, Dai CY, Wang F, et al. Experimental realization of universal geometric quantum gates with solid-state spins. Nature (2014) 514:72–5. doi:10.1038/nature13729
30. Arroyo-Camejo S, Lazariev L, Hell SW, Balasubramanian G. Room temperature high-fidelity holonomic single-qubit gate on a solid-state spin. Nat Commun (2014) 5:4870. doi:10.1038/ncomms5870
31. Yale CG, Heremans FJ, Zhou BB, Auer A, Burkard G, Awschalom DD. Optical manipulation of the Berry phase in a solid-state spin qubit. Nat Photon (2016) 10:184–9. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.278
32. Sekiguchi Y, Niikura N, Kuroiwa R, Kano H, Kosaka H. Optical holonomic single quantum gates with a geometric spin under a zero field. Nat Photon (2017) 11:309–14. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.40
33. Abdumalikov AA, Fink JM, Juliusson K, Pechal M, Berger S, Wallraff A, et al. Experimental realization of non-Abelian non-adiabatic geometric gates. Nature (2013) 496:482–5. doi:10.1038/nature12010
34. Feng GR, Xu GF, Long GL. Experimental realization of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation. Phys Rev Lett (2013) 110:190501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.190501
35. Zhou BB, Jerger PC, Shkolnikov VO, Heremans FJ, Burkard G, Awschalom DD. Holonomic quantum control by coherent optical excitation in diamond. Phys Rev Lett (2017) 119:140503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.140503
36. Zhang J, Devitt SJ, You JQ, Nori F. Holonomic surface codes for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Phys Rev A (2018) 97:022335. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022335
37. Leroux F, Pandey K, Rehbi R, Chevy F, Miniatura C, Grémaud B, et al. Non-Abelian adiabatic geometric transformations in a cold strontium gas. Nat Commun (2018) 9:3580. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05865-3
38. Nagata K, Kuramitani K, Sekiguchi Y, Kosaka H. Universal holonomic quantum gates over geometric spin qubits with polarised microwaves. Nat Commun (2018) 9:3227. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05664-w
39. Xu Y, Cai W, Ma Y, Mu X, Hu L, Chen T, et al. Single-loop realization of arbitrary nonadiabatic holonomic single-qubit quantum gates in a superconducting circuit. Phys Rev Lett (2018) 121:110501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.110501
40. Huang YY, Wu YK, Wang F, Hou PY, Wang WB, Zhang WG, et al. Experimental realization of robust geometric quantum gates with solid-state spins. Phys Rev Lett (2019) 122:010503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.010503
41. Yan TX, Liu BJ, Xu K, Song C, Liu S, Zhang ZS, et al. Experimental realization of nonadiabatic shortcut to non-Abelian geometric gates. Phys Rev Lett (2019) 122:080501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080501
42. Liu BJ, Song XK, Xue ZY, Wang X, Yung MH. Plug-and-play approach to nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates. Phys Rev Lett (2019) 123:100501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.100501
43. Ramberg N, Sjöqvist E. Environment-assisted holonomic quantum maps. Phys Rev Lett (2019) 122:140501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.140501
44. Xu Y, Hua Z, Chen T, Pan X, Li X, Han J, et al. Experimental implementation of universal nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates in a superconducting circuit. Phys Rev Lett (2020) 124:230503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.230503
45. Chen YH, Qin W, Stassi R, Wang X, Nori F. Fast binomial-code holonomic quantum computation with ultrastrong light-matter coupling. Phys Rev Res (2021) 3:033275. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033275
47. Georgescu IM, Ashhab S, Nori F. Quantum simulation. Rev Mod Phys (2014) 86:153–85. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153
48. Platzman PM, Dykman MI. Quantum computing with electrons floating on liquid helium. Science (1999) 284:1967–9. doi:10.1126/science.284.5422.1967
49. Wang J, He WT, Lu CW, Wy Y, Ai Q, Wh B. Controlled-not gate based on the rydberg states of surface electrons. Ann Phys (Berlin) (2023) 535:2300138. doi:10.1002/andp.202300138
50. Kawakami E, Elarabi A, Konstantinov D. Relaxation of the excited Rydberg states of surface electrons on liquid helium. Phys Rev Lett (2021) 126:106802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.106802
51. Koolstra G, Yang G, Schuster DI. Coupling a single electron on superfluid helium to a superconducting resonator. Nat Commun (2019) 10:5323. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13335-7
52. Zhou XJ, Koolstra G, Zhang XF, Yang G, Han X, Dizdar B, et al. Single electrons on solid neon as a solid-state qubit platform. Nature (2022) 605:46–50. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04539-x
53. Glasson P, Dotsenko V, Fozooni P, Lea MJ, Bailey W, Papageorgiou G, et al. Observation of dynamical ordering in a confined Wigner crystal. Phys Rev Lett (2001) 87:176802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.176802
54. Ikegami H, Akimoto H, Kono K. Nonlinear transport of the Wigner solid on superfluid 4He in a channel geometry. Phys Rev Lett (2009) 102:046807. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.046807
55. Rees DG, Kuroda I, Marrache-Kikuchi CA, Höfer M, Leiderer P, Kono K. Point-contact transport properties of strongly correlated electrons on liquid helium. Phys Rev Lett (2011) 106:026803. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.026803
56. Ikegami H, Akimoto H, Rees DG, Kono K. Evidence for reentrant melting in a quasi-one-dimensional Wigner crystal. Phys Rev Lett (2012) 109:236802. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.236802
57. Rees DG, Beysengulov NR, Lin JJ, Kono K. Stick-slip motion of the Wigner solid on liquid helium. Phys Rev Lett (2016) 116:206801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.206801
58. Rees DG, Beysengulov NR, Teranishi Y, Tsao CS, Yeh SS, Chiu SP, et al. Structural order and melting of a quasi-one-dimensional electron system. Phys Rev B (2016) 94:045139. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.045139
59. Badrutdinov AO, Rees DG, Lin JY, Smorodin AV, Konstantinov D. Unidirectional charge transport via ripplonic polarons in a three-terminal microchannel device. Phys Rev Lett (2020) 124:126803. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.126803
60. Bradbury FR, Takita M, Gurrieri TM, Wilkel KJ, Eng K, Carroll MS, et al. Efficient clocked electron transfer on superfluid helium. Phys Rev Lett (2011) 107:266803. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.266803
61. Kielpinski D, Monroe C, Wineland DJ. Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer. Nature (2002) 417:709–11. doi:10.1038/nature00784
62. Chen JB, Zadorozhko AA, Konstantinov D. Strong coupling of a two-dimensional electron ensemble to a single-mode cavity resonator. Phys Rev B (2018) 98:235418. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235418
63. Lyon SA. Spin-based quantum computing using electrons on liquid helium. Phys Rev A (2006) 74:052338. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.74.052338
64. Schuster DI, Fragner A, Dykman MI, Lyon SA, Schoelkopf RJ. Proposal for manipulating and detecting spin and orbital states of trapped electrons on helium using cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev Lett (2010) 105:040503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.040503
65. Kawakami E, Elarabi A, Konstantinov D. Image-charge detection of the Rydberg states of surface electrons on liquid helium. Phys Rev Lett (2019) 123:086801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.086801
66. Tokura Y, van der Wiel WG, Obata T, Tarucha S. Coherent single electron spin control in a slanting Zeeman field. Phys Rev Lett (2006) 96:047202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.047202
67. Kawakami E, Chen J, Benito M, Konstantinov D. Blueprint for quantum computing using electrons on helium. Phys Rev Appl (2023) 20:054022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.054022
68. Nielsen MA, Chuang IL. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press (2010).
70. Zou S, Konstantinov D. Image-charge detection of the rydberg transition of electrons on superfluid helium confined in a microchannel structure. New J Phys (2022) 24:103026. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac9696
71. Johansson JR, Nation PD, Nori F. QuTiP: an open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Comput Phys Commun (2012) 183:1760–72. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.02.021
72. Johansson JR, Nation PD, Nori F. QuTiP 2: a python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems. Comput Phys Commun (2013) 184:1234–40. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.11.019
Keywords: holonomic quantum computation, geometric phase, surface electron, quantum computation, quantum information
Citation: Wang J, He W-T, Wang H-B and Ai Q (2024) Universal quantum gates by nonadiabatic holonomic evolution for the surface electron. Front. Phys. 12:1348804. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2024.1348804
Received: 03 December 2023; Accepted: 08 January 2024;
Published: 31 January 2024.
Edited by:
Tao Li, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, ChinaReviewed by:
Xue-Ke Song, Anhui University, ChinaGuanyu Wang, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, China
Hai-Rui Wei, University of Science and Technology Beijing, China
Copyright © 2024 Wang, He, Wang and Ai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hai-Bo Wang, aGJ3YW5nQGJudS5lZHUuY24=; Qing Ai, YWlxaW5nQGJudS5lZHUuY24=