Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Phys.

Sec. Medical Physics and Imaging

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancements in instrumentation and detector modeling for TOF-based medical imagingView all 3 articles

Simulation Study of a Low-Cost Slide-Through PET Scanner Based on Narrow Flat Panels with Monolithic Detectors

Provisionally accepted
Elke  DhaenensElke DhaenensBoris  VervenneBoris Vervenne*Maya  Abi AklMaya Abi AklJens  MaebeJens MaebeChristian  VanhoveChristian VanhoveStefaan  VandenbergheStefaan Vandenberghe
  • Universiteit Gent Medical Imaging and Signal Processing, Ghent, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Patient throughput in conventional PET systems is constrained by limited system sensitivity and the need for bed positioning. This study proposes a cost-effective Slide-Through PET (ST-PET) design based on two narrow monolithic LYSO detector panels with depth-of-interaction (DOI) readout. Each vertical panel has a length of 190.5 cm and consist of a 20.9-cm-wide top part for scanning the torso, and a 10.3-cm-wide bottom part to image the legs. The panels translate laterally relative to a standing patient to cover a 73.9 cm-wide field of view. Methods: The ST-PET system was simulated in GATE and compared with two reference designs: a cylindrical PET, and a wide static flat-panel PET. All systems used identical high resolution monolithic LYSO detectors (300 ps TOF, 2.67 mm DOI). Different panel motion strategies were explored for the ST-PET, and system performance was assessed in terms of sensitivity, spatial resolution, and image quality using NEMA image quality (IQ) and anthropomorphic XCAT phantoms.Results: Parallel motion of the panels ensured complete anatomical coverage, whereas other motion strategies provided focused but incomplete sampling. Sensitivity for a whole-body water phantom was 1.66 cps/kBq in the upper region and 0.52 cps/kBq in the lower region, whereas the cylindrical reference system provided 1.05 cps/kBq in both regions. The ST-PET system achieved sub-3 mm spatial resolution in the center of the field of view. Image quality varied between the upper and lower ST-PET sections, with superior contrast recovery and noise characteristics in the torso region. Shorter scan times suffice using the ST-PET to obtain similar noise characteristics in the lung and liver than with the cylindrical reference. Mild elongation artifacts are observed in the IQ and XCAT images for both flat-panel systems.Conclusion: ST-PET demonstrates the feasibility of a compact sliding-panel geometry that delivers high spatial resolution and competitive sensitivity while enabling workflow efficiencies that could enhance throughput in clinical PET. Additional improvements in TOF resolution are needed to mitigate limited angle artifacts, which would further enhance the relevance of such a narrow-panel geometry.

Keywords: Flat-panel detectors, Monte Carlo simulation, performance evaluation, High-throughput imaging, Cost-Efficient Imaging, Non-conventional Geometries, Upright imaging, Time-of-flight

Received: 24 Sep 2025; Accepted: 14 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dhaenens, Vervenne, Abi Akl, Maebe, Vanhove and Vandenberghe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Boris Vervenne, boris.vervenne@ugent.be

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.