Skip to main content

Pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance post-marketing drug safety studies

Cover image for Research Topic "Pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance post-marketing drug safety studies"
134kviews
Editorial20 August 2024
Editorial: Pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance post-marketing drug safety studies

Pharmacoepidemiology defined as "the study of the usage and effects of drugs in a large group of people" enables the cost-effective inclusion of significantly larger number of patients compared to pre-marketing studies, leading to a more accurate measurement of both the adverse and beneficial effects of drugs. Pharmacoepidemiological studies provide better quantification of the incidence of known adverse and beneficial effects in patients not enrolled in clinical trials, and those with multiple diseases and taking concurrent medication. These studies also assess the relative effectiveness and safety of drugs used for the same condition. Additionally, they provide information not obtainable from pre-marketing studies, such as insight into rare and delayed effects, pattern of drug utilization, effects of overdose, economic implications of drug use, and reassurance regarding drug safety (Strom, 2019;Crescioli et al., 2022). Whereas, pharmacovigilance defined as "the science and practices relating to the identification, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse drug events or any other potential drug-related problems" (WHO, 2002). It plays an important role in post-marketing drug safety studies. It encompasses detecting, assessing and reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs), signal detection, elucidation of pharmacological and toxicological properties of drugs, identifying high risk patients, drug interactions, ADRs risk management, post-marketing surveillance, and taking regulatory actions when safety concerns arise (Raj et al., 2019;Trifirò and Crisafulli, 2022).The full implementation of pharmacovigilance practices is one of the prerequisites for the rational use of drugs. Pharmacoepidemiology provides vital methodological support in achieving and maintaining this pharmacovigilance contribution in the periods before, during and after the use of drugs (Akici and Oktay, 2007;Gulmez et al, 2020). Pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance work in synergy (Bérard, 2021;Lavertu et al., 2021;Crescioli et al., 2022).These studies are crucial for augmenting pre-marketing evidence, providing insights into the riskbenefit profile of drugs as well as its use in larger patient populations. They hold significant potential to contribute to post-marketing drug safety assessments. Utilizing real-world data sources, including spontaneous reporting system databases like the World Health Organization (WHO) global pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase), the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the EudraVigilance database of European Medication Agency, as well as claims databases, electronic healthcare records, and drug/disease registers, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiologic studies continuously monitor approved and marketed drugs. This ongoing monitoring process is crucial for the timely detection of new ADRs (Bérard, 2021;Crisafulli et al., 2023). In conclusion, articles included in this special issue highlight the importance pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance studies in enhancing our understanding of drug utilization and safety issues in patients suffering from different diseases. It also advocates that real world data sources are instrumental in timely detection of ADRs and continued surveillance of marketed drugs throughout the duration of their use to ensure that their benefit to risk ratio are and remain in acceptable limits.

6,264 views

2 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
14 June 2024
Risk of immune system and skin and subcutaneous tissue related adverse events associated with oxaliplatin combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study
Chunhong Zhang, 4 more and Dawei Shi

2,293 views

2 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
6 February 2024
Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis of 505 cases of infusion reactions in a tertiary hospital
Weiwei Yin, 8 more and Pengjiu Yu

2,567 views

1 citations

Adverse event reporting of four anti-Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
9 January 2024
Adverse event reporting of four anti-Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system
Wenfang Sun, 6 more and Hua Cheng
Background: Anti-Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) have shown significant efficacy in preventing migraine. However, there have been limited reports of adverse events (AEs) after marketing, particularly for eptinezumab launched in 2020. The study aimed to mine and analyze the AE signals with four anti-CGRP mAbs from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to gain insights into the safety profile of these medications post-marketing. Methods: All AE reports on the four anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab) were retrieved from the FAERS database from the first quarter (Q1) of 2018 to Q1 of 2023. Disproportionality analysis was measured by reporting odd ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) to identify potential AE signals. Comparisons were made between the four drugs in terms of AEs.Results: A total of 38,515 reports of erenumab, 19,485 reports of galcanezumab, 5,332 reports of fremanezumab, and 2460 reports of eptinezumab were obtained, mostly reported in the second to third year after launch in the market. The common AEs to erenumab included constipation (22.60%), injection site pain (14.08%), and alopecia (7.23%). The AEs that occurred more frequently with galcanezumab included injection site pain (24.37%), injection site erythema (5.35%), and injection site haemorrhage (4.97%). Common AEs related to fremanezumab were injection site pain (13.10%), injection site erythema (7.02%), and injection site pruritus (5.47%). Fatigue (13.54%), throat irritation (9.02%), and pruritus (8.20%) were the most common AEs with eptinezumab. In addition, there are new AEs that were not listed in the drug instructions but occurred concurrently with multiple drugs, such as Raynaud's reaction, weight increase, menstrual disorders, throat tightness, and paraesthesia oral.: Common AE signals of the four anti-CGRP mAbs and new AE signals were found to provide a reference for clinical drug selection in clinical practice.

17,394 views

45 citations

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of mepolizumab in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database
Mepolizumab is primarily used in the treatment of asthma, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, eosinophilia syndrome, and chronic rhinitis with nasal polyps. The information about its adverse drug reactions is mainly derived from clinical trials, and there is a shortage of real-world studies with extensive sample sizes. In this study, the U.S. FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was analyzed to evaluate the side effects of mepolizumab. A total of 18,040 reports of mepolizumab-associated adverse events (AEs) were identified from the FAERS database. Multiple disproportionality analysis algorithms were used to determine the significance of these AEs. The study identified 198 instances of mepolizumab-induced AEs, including some important AEs not mentioned in the product labeling. The time to onset of adverse reactions was also analyzed, with a median time of 109 days. Most AEs occurred within the first month of mepolizumab use, but some may still occur after one year of treatment. Gender-specific analysis showed different high-risk AEs for females (digestive and neurological side effects) and males (serious adverse effects leading to hospitalization and death). The findings mentioned provide valuable insights on optimizing the use of mepolizumab, enhancing its effectiveness, and minimizing potential side effects. This information will greatly contribute to the practical implementation of the drug in clinical settings.

12,800 views

66 citations

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), the first antibody-drug conjugate targeting human trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2), has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer and urothelial cancer. However, there is currently a dearth of information regarding the safety profiles of SG in a large sample cohort. The objective of the present study is to investigate SG-related adverse events (AEs) in real-world settings leveraging the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to guide the safety management of clinical medication. The FAERS database was retrospectively queried to extract reports associated with SG from April 2020 to March 2023. To identify and evaluate potential AEs in patients receiving SG, various disproportionality analyses such as reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were employed. Overall, 2069 reports of SG as the “primary suspect” were identified. Noteworthy, SG was significantly associated with an increased risk of blood lymphatic system disorders (ROR, 7.18; 95% CI, 6.58-7.84) and hepatobiliary disorders (ROR, 2.68; 95% CI, 2.17-3.30) at the System Organ Class (SOC) level. Meanwhile, 61 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) simultaneously complied with all four algorithms were adopted. Therein, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, diarrhea, asthenia, alopecia, and electrolyte imbalance were consistent with the common AEs described in the clinical trials and specification of SG. Furthermore, unexpected significant AEs include colitis (ROR, 12.09; 95% CI, 9.1-16.08), heart rate increased (ROR, 5.11; 95% CI, 3.84-6.79), sepsis (ROR, 4.77; 95% CI, 3.59-6.34), cholestasis (ROR, 6.28; 95% CI, 3.48-11.36), blood bilirubin increased (ROR, 4.65; 95% CI, 2.42-8.94) and meningitis (ROR, 7.23; 95% CI, 2.71-19.29) were also be detected. The median time to onset of SG-related AEs was 14 (interquartile range [IQR], 7-52) days, with the majority occurring within the initial month of SG treatment. Our study validates the commonly known AEs and also found some potentially emerging safety issues related to SG in real-world clinical practice, which could provide valuable vigilance evidence for clinicians and pharmacists to manage the safety issues of SG.

8,284 views

38 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
26 October 2023
Big data- and machine learning-based analysis of a global pharmacovigilance database enables the discovery of sex-specific differences in the safety profile of dual IL4/IL13 blockade
Kassem Sharif, 6 more and Abdulla Watad

3,438 views

6 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
20 October 2023
Neurocognitive impairment in females with breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study using the World Health Organization’s database
Rachel Prevost, 7 more and Etienne Bastien

6,276 views

9 citations

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with low-molecular-weight heparin: clinical feature analysis of cases and pharmacovigilance assessment of the FAERS database
Background Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are commonly used anticoagulants for the management of arterial and venous thrombosis. However, it's crucial to be aware that LMWH can, in rare cases, lead to a dangerous complication known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacovigilance and clinical features of HIT associated with LMWH, as well as identify treatment strategies and risk factors to facilitate prompt management.We extracted adverse events report data from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for pharmacovigilance assessment. Case reports on LMWHs-induced HIT to March 20, 2023 were collected for retrospective analysis.Results Significantly elevated reporting rates of HIT were shown in adverse events (AEs) data of LMWHs in FAERS database, while tinzaparin had a higher PRR (Proportional Reporting Ratio) and ROR (Reporting Odds Ratio) than other LMWHs indicating a greater likelihood of HIT. Case reports analysis indicated that a total of 43 patients showed evidence of LMWHs-induced HIT with a median onset time of 8 days. Almost half of events were caused by enoxaparin. LMWHs were mainly prescribed for the treatment of embolism and the thromboprophylaxis of joint operation.Patients with a history of diabetes or surgery appeared to be more susceptible to HIT. Clinical symptoms were mostly presented as thrombus, skin lesion and dyspnea. Almost 90% of the patients experienced a platelet reduction of more than 50%, and had a Warkentin 4Ts score of more than six, indicating a high likelihood of HIT. In all patients, the LMWHs that were determined to be the cause were promptly withdrawn. Following the discontinuation of LMWHs, almost all patients were given alternative anticoagulants and eventually achieved recovery.Conclusion LMWH-induced HIT is rare but serious, with increased risk in patients with diabetes or a surgical history. Prompt recognition and management are crucial for the safe use of LMWHs.

19,846 views

11 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
14 August 2023
Safety profiles of methylphenidate, amphetamine, and atomoxetine: analysis of spontaneous reports submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system
Wei Wei, 8 more and Liang Huang
Safety profiles of methylphenidate, amphetamine, and atomoxetine: analysis of spontaneous reports submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system
Methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and Amphetamine are the three most commonly used medications approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, a comprehensive analysis of their safety profiles across various age groups and genders in real-world contexts has yet to be conducted. In this study, a pharmacovigilance analysis was performed using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to examine differences in adverse events between methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and Amphetamine. We used the standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) query generalized search for adverse events at the preferred term level based on case reports. After filtering duplicate reports, disproportionality analysis was used to detect safety signals according to the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). In order to delve into potential safety concerns, we undertook a two-step analysis of the data. Initially, the data was segmented based on age cohorts: 0-5 years, 6-12 years, 13-18 years, and individuals aged ≥19 years. Following this, after partitioning the data into males and females within the 0-18 years age group, and similarly for those aged ≥19 years, further analysis was conducted. The pharmacovigilance analysis uncovered substantial safety signals in the standardized MedDRA queries.Significant and noteworthy adverse event signals were also identified at the preferred term level. Specifically, methylphenidate was associated with myocardial infarction, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery dissection, electrocardiogram QT prolonged, growth retardation, self-destructive behavior, suicidal ideation, and completed suicide. Atomoxetine was linked to electrocardiogram QT prolonged, growth retardation, and tic. Amphetamine was recorded for coronary artery dissection, suicidal ideation, and completed suicide. This pharmacovigilance analysis demonstrated significant variations in the safety profiles of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and Amphetamine across different age groups and between different genders. Following an in-depth analysis of the FAERS database, we discerned prominent safety signals. Notably, the strength of the signals associated with coronary artery dissection induced by methylphenidate and amphetamine, as well as those related to suicide, demand particular attention. Consequently, it remains imperative to persist in monitoring these medications, assessing the associated risks, and carrying out comparative studies particularly geared towards ADHD drugs.

15,414 views

24 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
15 September 2023
Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study in primary healthcare in Catalonia
Maria Giner-Soriano, 5 more and Rosa Morros

2,931 views

6 citations

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
12 May 2023
Proarrhythmia associated with antiarrhythmic drugs: a comprehensive disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system
Feifei Wang, 2 more and Xinan Wu
Objective: This study aimed to identify the different associations between antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and arrhythmias, and to determine whether pharmacokinetic drug interactions involving AADs increase the risk of AAD-related arrhythmias compared to using AADs alone. Materials and methods: The disproportionality analysis of AAD-associated cardiac arrhythmias, including AAD monotherapies and concomitant use of pharmacokinetic interacting agents involving AADs, was conducted by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) as detection of potential safety signals based on FAERS data from January 2016 to June 2022. We compared the clinical features of patients reported with AAD–associated arrhythmias between fatal and non-fatal groups, and further investigated the onset time (TTO) following different AAD regimens. Results: A total of 11754 AAD–associated cardiac arrhythmias reports were identified, which was more likely to occur in the elderly (52.17%). Significant signals were detected between cardiac arrhythmia and all AAD monotherapies, with ROR ranging from 4.86 with mexiletine to 11.07 with flecainide. Regarding four specific arrhythmias in High Level Term (HLT) level, the AAD monotherapies with the highest ROR were flecainide in cardiac conduction disorders (ROR025 = 21.18) , propafenone in rate and rhythm disorders (ROR025 = 10.36), dofetilide in supraventricular arrhythmias (ROR025 = 17.61), and ibutilide in ventricular arrhythmias (ROR025 = 4.91). Dofetilide/ibutilide, ibutilide, mexiletine/ibutilide and dronedarone presented no signal in the above four specific arrhythmias respectively. Compared with amiodarone monotherapy, sofosbuvir plus amiodarone detected the most significantly increased ROR in arrhythmias. Conclusion: The investigation showed the spectrum and risk of AAD–associated cardiac arrhythmias varied among different AAD therapies. The early identification and management of AAD-associated arrhythmias are of great importance in clinical practice.
Proarrhythmia associated with antiarrhythmic drugs: a comprehensive disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

6,645 views

24 citations