Efficient Non-fullerene Organic Solar Cells Enabled by Sequential Fluorination of Small-Molecule Electron Acceptors

Introduction

Bulk heterojunction organic solar cells (OSCs) are a promising technology for solar energy collection and have attracted much interest owing to their unique advantages for the fabrication of lightweight and flexible devices (Li et al., 2016b, 2017a, 2018a,b; Zhao et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017b, 2018; Cheng et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2018; Zhang, 2018). Over the past several years, although fullerene derivatives have been extensively used as electron-acceptor materials for OSCs, their various intrinsic limitations, such as poor absorption in the visible-light region, a difficult-to-adjust molecular structure and morphological instability, have impeded the further development of OSCs (He and Li, 2011). To circumvent this constraint, considerable progress has been achieved recently due to the development of non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs) for high-performance non-fullerene OSCs, as NFAs have high absorption coefficients and suitable frontier molecular orbital energy levels that facilitate both the harvesting of solar photons and charge separation (Bin et al., 2016; Du et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2017; Kan et al., 2017b; Xu et al., 2017; Cui et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2018).

Typically, to achieve high photovoltaic performance of OSCs based on novel NFAs, much effort has been devoted to the use of advanced device structures and sophisticated film-processing techniques (Li et al., 2016a, 2017c; Meng et al., 2016; Bao et al., 2017; Kan et al., 2017a; Zhang et al., 2017a; Wu et al., 2018). It is well established that the light-harvesting capability of OSCs plays a critical role in their photovoltaic performance, as their power conversion efficiencies can be enhanced by expanding the absorption spectrum of the photoactive layer in the near-infrared (NIR) region. Therefore, NFAs with absorption spectra extending into the NIR region have been explored, especially with respect to their potential applications in semi-transparent organic photovoltaics and tandem OSCs (Li et al., 2017b; Yao et al., 2017, 2018). Furthermore, the fluorination of conjugated semiconductors has proved to be an effective synthetic strategy for developing efficient photoactive-layer materials for OSC applications. The introduction of fluorine atoms into small molecules or polymers can not only optimize their optical and electrical properties but also promote intermolecular interactions via the formation of non-covalent F···S and F···H bonds, resulting in enhanced charge mobility (Wang et al., 2013; Jo et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2017). More importantly, fluorination can be used to fine-tune the hydrophobicity and polarity of conjugated semiconductors, thus permitting control over the interfacial interactions in blend films (Pagliaro and Ciriminna, 2005). The combination of these advantages leads to improved film morphology with appropriate phase domains and larger interfacial areas, which facilitates exciton dissociation and charge transport and thus enhances the overall photovoltaic performance of OSCs.

In this work, we designed and synthesized a series of non-fullerene electron acceptors (BT-IC, BT-F, and BT-2F) with different numbers of fluorine atoms on their end groups. The strong intramolecular charge transfer between the electron-rich cores and electron-deficient end groups of these acceptors was found to result in intense absorption in the NIR region. The sequential fluorination of the end groups not only enhanced the light-harvesting capabilities of BT-F and BT-2F but also simultaneously increased their electron mobilities, leading to a higher short-circuit current density (J_SC). More importantly, the fluorinated acceptors exhibited more favorable phase separation after blending with a medium-band-gap conjugated polymer. The combination of these phenomena led to improved short-circuit current density and thus enhanced the photovoltaic performance of the resulting devices.

Experimental

Instrumentation

¹H and ¹³C NMR were characterized with Bruker-500 spectrometer in deuterated chloroform solution at 298 K. Chemical shifts were recorded as δ values (ppm) with the internal standard of tetramethylsilane (TMS). Mass spectra were collected on a MALDI Micro MX mass spectrometer, or an API QSTAR XL System. Number-average (M_n) and polydispersity index (PDI) were determined on a Polymer Laboratories PL-GPC 220 using 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene as eluent at 150°C vs. polystyrene standards. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed on a Netzsch TG 209 under nitrogen at a heating rate of 10°C min⁻¹. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on a Netzsch DSC 204 under nitrogen flow at heating/cooling rates of 10/10°C min⁻¹. The absorption coefficients of films are calculated by dividing the film thickness with the maximum absorption peak. The thin films with thickness of about 100 nm (measured by the profilometer) is spin-coated from chloroform solution on the top of quartz. Then the absorption spectra of these films were recorded by a HP 8453 spectrophotometer. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed on a CHI600D electrochemical workstation with a glassy carbon working electrode and a Pt wire counter electrode at a scanning rate of 50 mV s⁻¹ against an Ag/Ag⁺ reference electrode with a nitrogen saturated anhydrous solution of tetra-n-butylammonium hexafluorophosphate in acetonitrile (0.1 mol L⁻¹). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were carried out using a Digital Instrumental DI Multimode Nanoscope III in a taping mode. TEM images were characterized with a JEM-2100F instrument.

Photovoltaic Device Fabrication

The non-fullerene organic solar cells with a conventional device structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/active layer/PFN-Br/Ag were fabricated. Here PFN-Br represents poly[(9,9-bis(3′-((N,N-dimethyl)-N-ethylammonium)-propyl)-2,7-fluorene)-alt-2,7-(9,9-dioctylfluorene)] dibromide, which functioned as the cathode interlayer to facilitate electron extraction from the active layer. Before fabrication of the device, the indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass substrates were cleaned by ultrasonic treatment in deionized water, acetone, isopropyl alcohol, and dried in oven at 80°C for 12 h before used. After PEDOT:PSS (30 nm) layer was spin coated onto the substrate, and dried at 150°C for 15 min in air. Then, the ITO substrates were transferred into a nitrogen protected glovebox where the H₂O concentration is ≤ 0.5 ppm and O₂ concentration is ≤ 20 ppm. The thin film of active layer was spin-coated from a solution of PTZPF:non-fullerene acceptor blend in chlorobenzene. A thin PFN-Br layer (5 nm) was then spin coated onto the active layer as the cathode interface layer. The substrates were then transferred to a vacuum thermal evaporator, followed by deposition of the Ag cathode at a pressure of 2 × 10⁻⁷ Torr through a shadow mask. Before the J-V test, a physical mask with an aperture with precise area of 0.04 cm² was used to define the device area. The J-V curves were measured on a computer-controlled Keithley 2,400 source meter under 1 sun, the AM 1.5 G spectra came from a class solar simulator (Enlitech, Taiwan), and the light intensity was 100 mWcm⁻² as calibrated by a China General Certification Center-certified reference monocrystal silicon cell (Enlitech). The external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra measurements were performed on a commercial QE measurement system (QE-R3011, Enlitech).

Materials

The monomers of thieno[3′,2′:4,5] cyclopenta[1,2-b] thieno[2″,3″:3′,4′] cyclopenta[1′,2′:4,5] thieno[2,3-f] [1] benzothiophene-2,8-dicarboxaldehyde, 5,11-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy] -4,4,10,10-tetrakis(4-hexylphenyl)-4,10-dihydro (1) were synthesized according to the reported procedures (Li et al., 2017b). And the donor polymer PTZPF was synthesized via Stille polymerization (Scheme S1, supporting information, SI, with molecular structure shown in Figure 1A). 2-(3-Oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile (2), a mixture of 2-(5-fluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile and 2-(6-fluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile (3) and 2-(5,6-difluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile (4) were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification. The small-molecule acceptors were prepared as the following procedures as below.

SCHEME 1

Scheme 1. Synthetic route of the small-molecule non-fullerene acceptors.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of PTZPF; (B) UV–vis absorption spectra and (C) energy level diagrams of BT-IC, BT-F, BT-2F, and PTZPF; (D) UV–vis spectra of PTZPF:NFA blend films.

Synthesis of BT-IC

2-(3-Oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile (2) (194.2 mg, 1.0 mmol) was added into the mixture of thieno[3′,2′:4,5] cyclopenta[1,2-b] thieno[2″,3″:3′,4′] cyclopenta[1′,2′:4,5] thieno[2,3-f] [1] benzothiophene-2,8-dicarboxaldehyde, 5,11-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy] -4,4,10,10-tetrakis(4-hexylphenyl)-4,10-dihydro (1) (133.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) in chloroform (50 mL) with pyridine (1 mL). The reactant was refluxed for 6 h under nitrogen atmosphere. After cooling to room temperature, the reactant was poured into methanol and the precipitate was filtered off. The crude product was purified by silica gel using a mixture of hexane/dichloromethane as the eluent to give a blue black powder (121.2 mg, 73%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, δ): 8.79 (s, 2H), 8.64 (m, 2H), 7.87 (m, 2H), 7.70 (m, 4H), 7.48 (s, 2H), 7.31 (m, 8H), 7.08 (m, 8H), 3.48 (t, 4H), 2.57 (t, 8H), 1.60-1.53 (m, 2H), 1.35-1.28 (m, 48H), 0.96 (t, 6H), 0.87 (m, 18H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃, δ): 188.56, 164.46, 160.31, 157.20, 153.89, 146.22, 142.16, 142.14, 140.67, 139.93, 138.69, 138.45, 138.23, 136.81, 135.89, 135.01, 134.30, 128.51, 128.50, 128.31, 125.25, 123.61, 121.32, 114.81, 68.40, 63.94, 39.38, 35.56, 31.71, 31.26, 31.24, 29.54, 29.21, 28.77, 23.34, 22.68, 22.59, 14.21, 14.10, 10.78. MS (MALDI-TOF) calcd for C₁₁₀H₁₁₄N₄O₄S₄, 1684.386; found, 1683.622.

Synthesis of BT-F

A similar procedure was followed as that described for BT-IC, a mixture of 2-(5-fluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile and 2-(6-fluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile (3) (212.2 mg, 1.0 mmol) and thieno[3′,2′:4,5] cyclopenta[1,2-b] thieno[2″,3″:3′,4′] cyclopenta[1′,2′:4,5] thieno[2,3-f] [1]benzothiophene-2,8-dicarboxaldehyde, 5,11-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy] -4,4,10,10-tetrakis(4-hexylphenyl)-4,10-dihydro (1) (133.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) were used. BT-F was obtained as a blue black solid (149.2 mg, 88.0 %). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, δ): 8.79 (s, 2H), 8.68 (m, 0.5H), 8.36 (m, 1.5H),7.88 (m, 1.5H), 7.52 (m, 2.5H), 7.40 (m, 2H), 7.30 (m, 8H), 7.08 (m, 8H), 3.48 (m, 4H), 2.53 (m, 8H), 1.60-1.54 (m, 2H), 1.35-1.28 (m, 48H), 0.96 (t, 6H), 0.87 (m, 18H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃, δ): 187.10, 167.69, 165.65, 165.19, 164.64, 164.61, 159.23, 158.89, 157.55, 157.50, 154.55, 154.39, 146.29, 142.28, 142.22, 142.19, 140.66, 140.62, 139.94, 139.88, 138.74, 138.69, 138.42, 138.29, 135.97, 135.79, 133.01, 128.50, 128.48, 128.39, 128.33, 127.76, 125.75, 125.67, 122.13, 121.67, 121.48, 121.15, 121.08, 114.81, 114.65, 114.50, 114.36, 112.89, 112.68, 110.75, 76.77, 69.09, 68.18, 63.95, 39.37, 35.55, 31.70, 31.25, 31.23, 29.56, 29.22, 28.78, 23.38, 22.71, 22.60, 14.22, 14.11, 10.80. MS (MALDI-TOF) calcd for C₁₁₀H₁₁₂F₂N₄O₄S₄, 1720.367; found, 1719.595.

Synthesis of BT-2F

A similar procedure was followed as that described for BT-IC, 2-(5,6-difluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile (4) (230.2 mg, 1.0 mmol) and thieno[3′,2′:4,5] cyclopenta[1,2-b] thieno[2″,3″:3′,4′] cyclopenta[1′,2′:4,5] thieno[2,3-f] [1] benzothiophene-2,8-dicarboxaldehyde, 5,11-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy] -4,4,10,10-tetrakis(4-hexylphenyl)-4,10-dihydro (1) (133.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) were used. BT-2F was obtained as a black solid (138.6 mg, 80.0 %). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃, δ): 8.78 (s, 2H), 8.52 (m, 2H), 7.64 (t, 2H), 7.50 (s, 2H), 7.31 (dd, 8H), 7.08 (d, 8H), 3.49 (t, 4H), 2.57 (t, 8H), 1.60-1.54 (m, 2H), 1.36-1.28 (m, 48H), 0.96 (t, 6H), 0.86 (m, 18H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃, δ): 186.22, 164.72, 160.58, 158.12, 155.49, 146.38, 142.47, 142.28, 140.62, 139.08, 138.95, 138.75, 138.35, 136.53, 136.03, 135.70, 134.62, 128.56, 128.48, 128.36, 120.53, 115.13, 114.39, 112.46, 68.67, 63.78, 39.40, 35.56, 31.72, 31.26, 31.24, 29.54, 29.21, 28.77, 23.34, 22.68, 22.59, 14.21, 14.10, 10.76. MS (MALDI-TOF) calcd for C₁₁₀H₁₁₀F₄N₄O₄S₄, 1756.348; found, 1755.581.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Characterization

The synthesis of the target compounds BT-IC, BT-F, and BT-2F is outlined in Scheme 1. These small-molecule acceptors were prepared via Knoevenagel condensation between thieno[3′,2′:4,5] cyclopenta[1,2-b] thieno[2″,3″:3′,4′] cyclopenta[1′,2′:4,5]thieno[2,3-f] [1] benzothiophene-2,8-dicarboxaldehyde, 5,11-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy] -4,4,10,10-tetrakis(4-hexylphenyl)-4,10-dihydro (1) and 2-(3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile (2) or its fluorinated derivatives at 60°C in the presence of a catalytic amount of pyridine. It is worth noting that the monofluorinated compound 3 consisted of two regioisomers, namely, 2-(5-fluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile and 2-(6-fluoro-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-ylidene)malononitrile. As these two isomers have very similar molecular structures and polarities, they could not be separated, and thus the resulting BT-F was obtained as a mixture of isomers. All three acceptors exhibited good solubility in typical organic solvents, such as chloroform, chlorobenzene and ortho-dichlorobenzene, at room temperature. The chemical structures of the three acceptors were confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (Figures S7–S12).

The thermal properties of these resulting NFAs were evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) under a nitrogen atmosphere (Figures S1, S2,). All of these NFAs exhibited excellent thermal stabilities with onset decomposition temperatures (T_d) higher than 310°C. The DSC curves were obtained by heating from 30 to 250°C in the second heating/cooling cycle. It was found that BT-IC exhibited a melting peak at 127°C, whereas no phase-transition signals were observed during the DSC measurements of the other two materials.

Optical, Electrochemical, and Electron-Transport Properties

Figure 1B shows the UV–vis absorption spectra of thin films of the donor polymer and acceptor molecules. All three NFAs showed similar absorption profile cut-offs in the NIR region (up to 866 nm) in the solid state. Such absorption profiles are complementary with a medium band gap conjugated polymer, namely PTZPF, which has the absorption onset of 620 nm (Figure 1D). Note that the complementary absorption is beneficial for the harvesting of solar photons to achieve a high short-circuit current density. The fluorinated small molecules BT-F and BT-2F exhibited slightly red-shifted absorption edges compared with BT-IC. An optical band gap of 1.43 eV was obtained for BT-IC, which slightly decreased to 1.42 and 1.41 eV for BT-F and BT-2F, respectively. Importantly, the absorption coefficients were slightly enhanced from 1.05 × 10⁵ cm⁻¹ for BT-IC to 1.12 × 10⁵ cm⁻¹ and 1.22 × 10⁵ cm⁻¹ for BT-F and BT-2F, respectively (Figure 1B), indicating that the introduction of fluorine atoms into these acceptors enhanced their light-harvesting ability through improved intermolecular interactions (Yang et al., 2013; Wolf et al., 2015).

The electrochemical properties and energy levels of the polymer acceptors were investigated by cyclic voltammetry. Here we used the potential ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc⁺) redox couple as the standard. Under the current measurement conditions, the potential of Fc/Fc⁺ couple was measured as 0.30 V regarding to the reference electrode. Assuming that the Fc/Fc⁺ redox couple has an absolute potential of −4.80 V to vacuum, the highest occupied molecular orbital energy levels (E_HOMO) is calculated as E_HOMO = –e (E_ox + 4.80 – 0.30) (eV), and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy levels (E_LUMO) is calculated as E_LUMO = –e (E_red + 4.80 – 0.30) (eV). The energy level diagrams of all of the materials are depicted in Figure 1C and the corresponding electrochemical data are summarized in Table 1. The calculated E_LUMO/E_HOMO values of BT-IC, BT-F and BT-2F were −3.88/−5.55 eV, −3.97/−5.57 eV and −4.00/−5.60 eV, respectively. Both the E_LUMO and E_HOMO levels of these acceptor molecules gradually decreased with the increasing number of fluorine atoms, indicating that fluorination of the end groups of small-molecule NFAs can effectively decrease the E_LUMO and E_HOMO levels owing to the strongly electron-withdrawing characteristics of fluorine atoms (Dutta et al., 2014). The E_LUMO and E_HOMO levels of the polymer donor PTZPF were −3.42 and −5.41 eV, respectively, which ensures an adequate driving force for efficient exciton dissociation (Scharber et al., 2010). The charge carrier mobilities of the pure films of acceptors were measured by the space-charge-limited current (SCLC) method using the Mott–Gurney equation (Figure S5). The measurements are carried out by fabricating electron-only devices with architecture of ITO/Ag/active layer/Ag structure. The pure film based on BT-2F exhibited the electron mobility (μ_e) of 9.64 × 10⁻⁵ cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹, which is higher than those of BT-F (μ_e = 5.53 × 10⁻⁵ cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹) and BT-IC (μ_e = 2.28 × 10⁻⁵ cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Optophysical and electrochemical properties of active layer materials.

Photovoltaic Performances

To elucidate the effects of fluorination on the photovoltaic properties, OSC devices were fabricated using PTZPF as the electron-donor material and BT-IC, BT-F, or BT-2F as the electron-acceptor material. The devices were fabricated with the conventional configuration of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/active layer/PFN-Br/Ag, and the device performances were measured under simulated AM 1.5 G illumination at 100 mW cm⁻². Poly[(9,9-bis(3'-((N,N-dimethyl)-N-ethylammonium)propyl)-2,7-fluorene)-alt-2,7-(9,9-dioctylfluorene)] dibromide (PFN-Br) was used as the cathode interfacial layer to facilitate charge carrier collection (Zhang et al., 2017c). The initial optimisation of device performance was carried out by screening the weight ratios of the donor:acceptor (D:A) blend, film thickness of the photoactive layers and the effects of additives to the processing solvents (Figure S6 and Table S1). All of the photoactive layers of the devices were processed under the optimized conditions, which consisted of a D:A weight ratio of 1:1, spin casting of the films from chlorobenzene containing 0.5 v/v% of 1-chloronaphthalene (CN) as additive, and annealing of the fabricated films at 120°C for 10 min. The current density–voltage (J–V) curves are presented in Figure 2A and the corresponding data are summarized in Table 2.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. (A) J–V curves and (B) EQE spectra of OSC devices measured under AM 1.5 G illumination at 100 mW cm⁻².

TABLE 2

Table 2. Photovoltaic parameters of OSCs measured under AM1.5 Illumination at 100 mW cm⁻².

Interestingly, the photovoltaic parameters of the resulting devices were strongly dependent on the number of fluorine substituents. The device based on BT-IC as the acceptor exhibited a moderate power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.63%, with an open-circuit voltage (V_OC) of 0.93 V, a J_SC of 12.27 mA cm⁻² and a fill factor (FF) of 49.0%. In contrast, the devices based on the fluorinated acceptors BT-F and BT-2F exhibited clearly enhanced PCE values of 7.27% (V_OC = 0.88 V, J_SC = 16.64 mA cm⁻² and FF = 49.0%) and 8.54% (V_OC = 0.84 V, J_SC = 19.29 mA cm⁻² and FF = 53.0%), respectively. It should be noted that despite the decrease in the V_OC of the resulting devices upon the incorporation of fluorine substituents into the acceptors, which is consistent with the down-shifted E_LUMO levels observed for BT-F and BT-2F (Brabec et al., 2010; Kang et al., 2012), the J_SC values were dramatically enhanced. The combination of these effects led to the clearly enhanced PCE values of the devices based on the fluorinated acceptors.

To investigate the obvious enhancement of J_SC, we analyzed the absorption of PTZPF:BT-IC, PTZPF:BT-F and PTZPF:BT-2F blend films (Figure 1D). Similar to the absorption of neat films of BT-IC, BT-F, or BT-2F, the absorption coefficients of the PTZPF:BT-F and PTZPF:BT-2F blend films were both slightly higher than that of the PTZPF:BT-IC blend film, which can be correlated to the improved J_SC of the devices based on fluorinated acceptors. Furthermore, to confirm the accuracy of the observed J_SC, we measured the external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) of the devices. It should be noted that the calculated J_SC values from the EQE spectra (Figure 2B) matched well with the J_SC values obtained from the J–V curves. The device based on BT-2F exhibited a stronger photocurrent response from 400 to 870 nm, with a maximum EQE of 75%, which was higher than those observed for the devices based on BT-F and BT-IC (Figure 2B).

Charge Generation, Transport, and Recombination

To study the charge generation process in the resulting bulk-heterojunction films, we measured the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the neat and D:A blend films. The peak emission of the pure PTZPF film was located at 640 nm upon excitation at 500 nm, whereas the acceptor molecules BT-IC, BT-F, and BT-2F exhibited similar emission peaks at ~845 nm upon excitation at 720 nm. As shown in Figure 3A, the strong emission peak of BT-IC was clearly observed in the PTZPF:BT-IC blend film, indicating the low charge separation efficiency of the device based on BT-IC. In contrast, the PL emission of the neat films was effectively quenched in the PTZPF:BT-F and PTZPF:BT-2F blend films, indicating that exciton dissociation and charge transfer were remarkably enhanced by the introduction of fluorine atoms into the acceptor moiety. A similar phenomenon can be observed in Figure 3B, where the PL of BT-2F was quenched by 92.7% in the blend film, which was more pronounced than the quenching observed for the blend films based on BT-F (90.9%) or BT-IT (86.4%).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. (A,B) Photoluminescence spectra of pristine donor films (excited at 500 nm), pristine acceptor films (excited at 720 nm) and corresponding blend films (excited at both 500 and 720 nm) with a film thickness of about 100 nm; (C,D) plots of (c) J_SC and (d) V_OC vs. light intensity for devices based on PTZPF:NFA blend films.

The J_SC and V_OC values of the devices were measured as a function of the light intensity (P_light) to elucidate the charge recombination dynamics in the photoactive layer, as shown in Figures 3C,D, respectively. For organic solar cells, the power-law dependence of J_SC on the illumination intensity can generally be expressed as J_SC ^∝(P_light)^S, where S is the exponential factor, which is close to unity when the bimolecular recombination in the device is weak (Kyaw et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2015). The extracted values of S were 1.058, 1.060 and 1.043 for the devices based on BT-IC, BT-F, and BT-2F, respectively, all of which were close to unity, indicating the weak bimolecular recombination in these devices (Yang et al., 2016). Based on the V_OC-P_light plot, V_OC was plotted against the natural logarithm of P_light and the slope of nkT/q was calculated, where an n value of unity implies predominantly bimolecular recombination and an enhanced dependence of V_OC on P_light (2kT/q) indicates trap-assisted monomolecular recombination (Gasparini et al., 2016). The calculated slopes were 1.32, 1.23, and 1.21 kT/q for the devices based on BT-IC, BT-F and BT-2F, respectively. The smaller slope value for BT-2F than the others suggests less trap-assisted recombination, thus resulting in a higher FF value.

Film Morphology

Tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements were performed to determine the influence of fluorination on the film morphology. Figures 4a–c shows topographical AFM images of active layers of the different NFAs. The PTZPF:BT-IC blend film contained large granular aggregates across the entire film with a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of 6.32 nm (Figure 4a), whereas the blend films gradually became smoother as the number of fluorine atoms increased, with RMS roughness values of 3.50 nm and 2.19 nm for BT-F and BT-2F, respectively, suggesting that the incorporation of fluorine atoms led to a smoother film morphology. The phase separation of the blend films with different electron acceptors was also readily apparent from the TEM images. Figure 4d shows that the PTZPF:BT-IC blend film exhibited large-scale phase-separation features across the entire film, which is unfavorable for charge transfer at the donor–acceptor interface. Interestingly, the degree of phase separation of the blend films gradually decreased as the number of fluorine atoms increased. Consequently, the PTZPF:BT-2F blend film exhibited a smoother surface morphology with favorable phase separation (Figure 4f), which induced desirable exciton dissociation and thus simultaneously enhanced the J_SC and FF values.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. AFM height images (10 μm × 10 μm) of (a) PTZPF:BT-IC, (b) PTZPF:BT-F, and (c) PTZPF:BT-2F; TEM images of (d) PTZPF:BT-IC, (e) PTZPF:BT-F, and (f) PTZPF:BT-2F.

Conclusions

In summary, three NIR-absorbing electron acceptors containing different numbers of fluorine atoms were designed and synthesized. The results revealed that the fluorinated acceptors outperformed their non-fluorinated counterpart BT-IC. Sequentially increasing the number of fluorine atoms on the end groups of the acceptor molecules led to a dramatic improvement in the J_SC of the resulting photovoltaic devices. Non-fullerene OSCs based on the fluorinated acceptor BT-2F exhibited an improved PCE of 8.54% with a high J_SC of 19.29 mA cm⁻², regarding to the device based on BT-IC (PCE = 5.63%, J_SC = 12.27 mA cm⁻²) that does not contain fluorine atom. The improved photovoltaic performances of devices based on fluorinated acceptors can be correlated to the broad absorption profile extending into the NIR region, favorable film morphology and efficient charge transfer. These results demonstrate that fluorination can be an effective technique in the design of efficient electron-acceptor materials.

Author Contributions

RX, LY and FH conceived the ideas and coordinated the work. RX and LY designed the donor polymer and the acceptor molecules. RX synthesized the polymer PTZPF and conducted the DSC, TGA, UV-vis, PL and cyclic voltammetric measurements. HL performed the device fabrication, the light intensity-dependent J-V characterization, and analyzed the data. ZC synthesized the acceptor molecules of BT-IC, BT-F, and BT-2F. RX and HL conducted the AFM and TEM measurements. RX, LY, FH, and YC contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors commented on the manuscript and approved for submission.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 2014CB643501), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 91633301, 21490573, 51673069), the Natural Science Fund of Guangdong (No. 2017A030306011 and 2015A030313229), and the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (No. 201710010021, 201707020019 and 2017A050503002).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00303/full#supplementary-material

References

Bao, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Zhu, D., Yang, C., Li, Y., et al. (2017). High extinction coefficient thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-based copolymer for efficient fullerene-free solar cells with large current density. Chem. Mater. 29, 6766–6771. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01650

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bin, H., Gao, L., Zhang, Z. G., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., et al. (2016). 11.4% Efficiency non-fullerene polymer solar cells with trialkylsilyl substituted 2D-conjugated polymer as donor. Nat. Commun. 7:13651. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13651

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brabec, C. J., Cravino, A., Meissner, D., Sariciftci, N. S., Fromherz, T., Rispens, M. T., et al. (2010). Origin of the open circuit voltage of plastic solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 11, 374–380. doi: 10.1002/1616-3028(200110)11:5<374::AID-ADFM374>3.0.CO;2-W

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, P., Li, G., Zhan, X., and Yang, Y. (2018). Next-generation organic photovoltaics based on non-fullerene acceptors. Nat. Photon. 12, 131–142. doi: 10.1038/s41566-018-0104-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, Y., Yao, H. F., Yang, C. Y., Zhang, S. Q., and Hou, J. H. (2018). Organic solar cells with an efficiency approaching 15%. Acta Polym. Sin. 2, 223–230. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.17297

CrossRef Full Text

Dai, S., Zhao, F., Zhang, Q., Lau, T. K., Li, T., Liu, K., et al. (2017). Fused nonacyclic electron acceptors for efficient polymer solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1336–1343. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b12755

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, Z., Bao, X., Li, Y., Liu, D., Wang, J., Yang, C., et al. (2017). Balancing high open circuit voltage over 1.0 V and high short circuit current in benzodithiophene-based polymer solar cells with low energy loss: a synergistic effect of fluorination and alkylthiolation. Adv. Energy Mater. 8:1701471. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201701471

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dutta, G. K., Kim, T., Choi, H., Lee, J., Dong, S. K., Jin, Y. K., et al. (2014). Synthesis of fluorinated analogues of a practical polymer TQ for improved open-circuit voltages in polymer solar cells. Polym. Chem. 5, 2540–2547. doi: 10.1039/c3py01542d

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, B., Zhang, K., Jiang, X. F., Ying, L., Huang, F., and Cao, Y. (2017). High-Performance nonfullerene polymer solar cells based on imide-functionalized wide-bandgap polymers. Adv. Mater. Weinheim. 29:1606396. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606396

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, W., Zhang, M., Liu, T., Ming, R., An, Q., Wu, K., et al. (2018). Asymmetrical ladder-type donor-induced polar small molecule acceptor to promote fill factors approaching 77% for high-performance nonfullerene polymer solar cells. Adv. Mater. Weinheim. 30:1800052. doi: 10.1002/adma.201800052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gasparini, N., Jiao, X., Heumueller, T., Baran, D., Matt, G. J., Fladischer, S., et al. (2016). Designing ternary blend bulk heterojunction solar cells with reduced carrier recombination and a fill factor of 77%. Nat. Energy 1:16118. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Y., and Li, Y. (2011). Fullerene derivative acceptors for high performance polymer solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 1970–1983. doi: 10.1039/C0CP01178A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou, J., Inganäs, O., Friend, R. H., and Gao, F. (2018). Organic solar cells based on non-fullerene acceptors. Nat. Mater. 17, 119–128. doi: 10.1038/nmat5063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jo, J. W., Jung, J. W., Jung, E. H., Ahn, H. J., Shin, T., and Jo, W. H. (2015). Fluorination on both D and A Unit in D-A Type conjugated copolymer based on difluorobithiophene and benzothiadiazole for high efficient polymer solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2427–2434. doi: 10.1039/C5EE00855G

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kan, B., Feng, H., Wan, X., Liu, F., Ke, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2017a). Small-Molecule acceptor based on the heptacyclic benzodi(cyclopentadithiophene) unit for highly efficient nonfullerene organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4929–4934. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kan, B., Zhang, J., Liu, F., Wan, X., Li, C., Ke, X., et al. (2017b). Fine-tuning the energy levels of a nonfullerene small-molecule acceptor to achieve a high short-circuit current and a power conversion efficiency over 12% in organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. Weinheim. 30:1704904. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, H., Cho, C. H., Cho, H. H., Kang, T. E., Kim, H. J., Kim, K. H., et al. (2012). Controlling number of indene solubilizing groups in multiadduct fullerenes for tuning optoelectronic properties and open-circuit voltage in organic solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 110–116. doi: 10.1021/am201075y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kyaw, A. K., Wang, D. H., Wynands, D., Zhang, J., Nguyen, T. Q., Bazan, G. C., et al. (2013). Improved light harvesting and improved efficiency by insertion of an optical spacer (ZnO) in solution-processed small-molecule solar cells. Nano Lett. 13, 3796–3801. doi: 10.1021/nl401758g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, K., Xie, R., Zhong, W., Lin, K., Lei, Y., Huang, F., et al. (2018a). 8.0% Efficient all-polymer solar cells based on novel starburst polymer acceptors. Sci. China Chem. 61, 576–583. doi: 10.1007/s11426-017-9197-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, M., Gao, K., Wan, X., Zhang, Q., Kan, B., Xia, R., et al. (2017a). Solution-processed organic tandem solar cells with power conversion efficiencies >12%. Nat. Photon. 11, 85–90. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.240

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Qian, D., Zhong, L., Lin, J.-D., Jiang, Z.-Q., Zhang, Z.-G., et al. (2016a). A fused-ring based electron acceptor for efficient non-fullerene polymer solar cells with small HOMO offset. Nano Energy 27, 430–438. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.07.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Zhong, L., Gautam, B., Bin, H.-J., Lin, J.-D., Wu, F.-P., et al. (2017b). A near-infrared non-fullerene electron acceptor for high performance polymer solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1610–1620. doi: 10.1039/C7EE00844A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Fan, B., He, B., Ying, L., Zhong, W., Liu, F., et al. (2018b). Side-chain modification of polyethylene glycol on conjugated polymers for ternary blend all-polymer solar cells with efficiency up to 9.27%. Sci. China Chem. 61, 427–436. doi: 10.1007/s11426-017-9188-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Xu, X., Zhang, W., Meng, X., Ma, W., Yartsev, A., et al. (2016b). High performance all-polymer solar cells by synergistic effects of fine-tuned crystallinity and solvent annealing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10935–10944. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04822

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Zhang, W., Xu, X., Genene, Z., Di Carlo Rasi, D., Mammo, W., et al. (2017c). High-performance and stable all-polymer solar cells using donor and acceptor polymers with complementary absorption. Adv. Energy Mater. 7:1602722. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602722

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, L., Chen, W., Xu, T., and Yu, L. (2015). High-performance ternary blend polymer solar cells involving both energy transfer and hole relay processes. Nat. Commun. 6:7327. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8327

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, Z., Bin, H., Liu, T., Zhang, Z. G., Yang, Y., Zhong, C., et al. (2018). Fine-tuning of molecular packing and energy level through methyl substitution enabling excellent small molecule acceptors for nonfullerene polymer solar cells with efficiency up to 12.54%. Adv. Mater. Weinheim. 30:1706124. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, D., Fu, H., Xiao, C., Meng, X., Winands, T., Ma, W., et al. (2016). Three-bladed rylene propellers with three-dimensional network assembly for organic electronics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10184–10190. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pagliaro, M., and Ciriminna, R. (2005). New fluorinated functional materials. J. Mater. Chem. 15, 4981–4991. doi: 10.1039/b507583c

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scharber, M. C., Mühlbacher, D., Koppe, M., Denk, P., Waldauf, C., Heeger, A. J., et al. (2010). Design rules for donors in bulk-heterojunction solar cells: towards 10% energy-conversion efficiency. Adv. Mater. 20, 579–583. doi: 10.1002/adma.200702337

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, N., Chen, Z., Wei, W., and Jiang, Z. (2013). Fluorinated benzothiadiazole-based conjugated polymers for high-performance polymer solar cells without any processing additives or post-treatments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17060–17068. doi: 10.1021/ja409881g

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wolf, J., Cruciani, F., Labban, A. E., and Beaujuge, P. M. (2015). Wide band-gap 3,4-difluorothiophene-based polymer with 7% solar cell efficiency: an alternative to P3HT. Chem. Mater. 27, 4184–4187. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01520

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, W., Zhang, G., Xu, X., Wang, S., Li, Y., and Peng, Q. (2018). Wide bandgap molecular acceptors with a truxene core for efficient nonfullerene polymer solar cells: linkage position on molecular configuration and photovoltaic properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28:1707493. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201707493

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, S. J., Zhou, Z., Liu, W., Zhang, Z., Liu, F., Yan, H., et al. (2017). A twisted thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-based electron acceptor featuring a 14-pi-electron indenoindene core for high-performance organic photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. Weinheim. 29:1704510. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704510

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, L., Tumbleston, J. R., Zhou, H., Ade, H., and You, W. (2013). Disentangling the impact of side chains and fluorine substituents of conjugated donor polymers on the performance of photovoltaic blends. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 316–326. doi: 10.1039/C2EE23235A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Zhang, Z. G., Bin, H., Chen, S., Gao, L., Xue, L., et al. (2016). Side-chain isomerization on n-type organic semiconductor itic acceptor make 11.77% high efficiency polymer solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15011–15018. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, H., Cui, Y., Yu, R., Gao, B., Zhang, H., and Hou, J. (2017). Design, synthesis, and photovoltaic characterization of a small molecular acceptor with an ultra-narrow band gap. Angew.Chem. Int. Educ. 56, 3045–3049 doi: 10.1002/anie.201610944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, Z., Liao, X., Ke, G., Lin, F., Xu, X., Shi, X., et al. (2018). Dithienopicenocarbazole-based acceptors for efficient organic solar cells with optoelectronic response over 1000 nm and an extremely low energy loss. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2054–2057. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b13239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Li, Y., Huang, J., Hu, H., Zhang, G., Ma, T., et al. (2017a). Ring-fusion of perylene diimide acceptor enabling efficient nonfullerene organic solar cells with a small voltage loss. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 16092–16095. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b09998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Zhu, L., and Wei, Z. (2017b). Toward over 15% power conversion efficiency for organic solar cells: current status and perspectives. Small Methods 1:1700258. doi: 10.1002/smtd.201700258

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, K., Huang, F., and Cao, Y. (2017c). Water/alcohol soluble conjugated polymer interlayer materials and their application in solution processed multilayer organic optoelectronic devices. Acta Polym. Sin. 9, 1400–1414. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2017.17075

CrossRef Full Text

Zhang, S., Qin, Y., Zhu, J., and Hou, J. (2018). Over 14% efficiency in polymer solar cells enabled by a chlorinated polymer donor. Adv. Mater. Weinheim. 30:1800868. doi: 10.1002/adma.201800868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X. (2018). A tandem polymer solar cell based on non-fullerene-acceptors yields an efficiency approaching 15%. Acta. Polym. Sin. 2, 129–131. doi: 10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2018.18019

CrossRef Full Text

Zhao, J., Li, Y., Yang, G., Jiang, K., Lin, H., Ade, H., et al. (2016). Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents. Nat. Energy 1:15027. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2015.27

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, J., Ke, Z., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Dai, S., Wu, Y., et al. (2018). Naphthodithiophene-based nonfullerene acceptor for high-performance organic photovoltaics: effect of extended conjugation. Adv. Mater. Weinheim. 30:4312. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar