Original Research ARTICLE
Morphology Controllable Synthesis of NiO/NiFe2O4 Hetero-Structures for Ultrafast Lithium-Ion Battery
- 1School of Chemistry & Materials Science, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Green Synthetic Chemistry for Functional Materials, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (MOE), College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- 3School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Composite and Functional Materials, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Rational design of high performance anode material with outstanding rate capability and cycling stability is of great importance for lithium ion batteries (LIBs). Herein, a series of NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures with adjustable porosity, particle size, and shell/internal structure have been synthesized via a controllable annealing process. The optimized NiO/NiFe2O4 (S-NFO) is hierarchical hollow nanocube that is composed of ~5 nm subunits and high porosity. When being applied as anode for LIBs, the S-NFO exhibits high rate capability and excellent cycle stability, which remains high capacity of 1,052 mAh g−1 after 300 cycles at 5.0 A g−1 and even 344 mAh g−1 after 2,000 cycles at 20 A g−1. Such impressive electrochemical performance of S-NFO is mainly due to three reasons. One is high porosity of its hierarchical hollow shell, which not only promotes the penetration of electrolyte, but also accommodates the volume change during cycling. Another is the small particle size of its subunits, which can effectively shorten the electron/ion diffusion distance and provide more active sites for Li+ storage. Besides, the hetero-interfaces between NiO and NiFe2O4 also contribute toitsfast charge transport.
Lithium ion batteries (LIBs), with the advantages of high energy density and environmental benignity, have become the most widely used energy storage systems for portable electronic equipment. The growing needs for high-performance electronic devices and electric vehicles, however, constantly demand LIBs for further innovation, in terms of higher energy/power density, longer lifetime, greater rate capability, and lower cost. It is therefore crucial to develop high-performance electrode materials (Poizot et al., 2000; Goriparti et al., 2014; Peng et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015a,b; Hou et al., 2016; Pagot et al., 2017; Wei et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Huang et al., in press; Liu et al., in press), or to develop other energy storage devices, such as sodium ion battery, metal-O2 battery (Han et al., 2014, 2017, 2018), and Li-S battery (Kim et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2018). As for the anode materials in LIBs, NiFe2O4 has drawn extensive attention, due to its low price, earth abundant, and high theoretical capacity (915 mAh g−1) (Park et al., 2015; Jin et al., 2017; Lina et al., 2017). During the Li+ insertion/extraction, however, NiFe2O4 suffers from unsatisfied capacity retention and poor rate capability that causes by the server volume change and limited electrochemical kinetics. Although numerous strategies have been proposed to improve the electrochemical performance of NiFe2O4 (Gao et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2017; Li D. et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2017), it is still a big challenge to deliver decent capacities at high current density (above 10 A g−1) or well-capacity retention over 2000 cycles.
Smart design of hetero-structures is an emerging strategy to improving the electrochemical kinetics of transition metal oxides (TMOs) (Zheng X. et al., 2018). For example, Hou et al. reported the appealing electrochemical performance of ZnFe2O4/ZnO, which outperformed the single ZnFe2O4 (Hou L. et al., 2015). Ting et al. observed the fast charge transfer in the CoO/Cu2O hetero-structure, where Li+ diffusion kinetics and electronic conductivity were promoted (Tingting et al., 2017). Considering the high theoretical capacity (718 mAh g−1) and non-pollution of NiO (Shi et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2018), hybridizing NiO with NiFe2O4 host great promising for high performance LIBs. However, only limited studies have been paid to the Li storage performance of NiO/NiFe2O4 hybrid (Du et al., 2016).
Tailoring the nano-architecture of electrode is another important approach to enhance the electrochemical performance. Previous literatures had evidenced that morphology of electrode materials can effectively affect its electrochemical performance (Li et al., 2013; Hou H. et al., 2015; Liang et al., 2018). Particularly, hierarchical hollow electrode have received great attention (Chen et al., 2015; Zheng Z. et al., 2018). Nowadays, TMOs in different morphologies, such as nanotube (Gang et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2014), porous plates (Hui et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016), and hollow octahedron, have been realized. However, the relationship between morphology of electrode and its electrochemical performance is still under investigation.
Taking all the discussion above into consideration, fabricating NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structure, and further tailoring its morphology seem to have great potential for ultrafast LIBs. Ni3[Fe(CN)6]2, a typical Prussian blue analog, was selected as precursor to synthesize morphology controllable NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures, since it contains both Fe and Ni element at the same. By taking advantage of the unique reactivity and thermal stability of Ni3[Fe(CN)6]2, herein, we obtain a series of NiO/NiFe2O4 with adjustable porosity, particle size, and shell/internal structure via a simple calcination procedure. The obtained samples are porous filled-nanocubes (P-NFO), hierarchical hollow-nanocubes with ~5 nm subunits (S-NFO), and hierarchical hollow-nanocubes with ~12 nm subunits (L-NFO). The optimized S-NFO exhibits excellent Li+ storage performance, with high capacity of ~1,052 mAh g−1 after 300 cycles at 5.0 A g−1 and even ~344 mAh g−1 after 2,000 cycles at 20 A g−1. The superior electrochemical performance of S-NFO is attributed to its unique structural advantages, which combined the hetero-structure, high porosity, and small particle size. Further investigation reveals that the electrochemical reaction of S-NFO is dominated by capacitive behavior. The simple and large-scalable synthesis of these NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures may shed light on design for other high performance electrode materials.
Synthesis of NiO/NiFe2O4 Hetero-Structures
NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures were obtained as follows. First, Ni3[Fe(CN)6]2 (NiFe-PBA) was synthesized according to previous literatures (Xuan et al., 2018) with minor modifications. Second, the NiFe-PBA was transferred into a tube furnace, heated to the target temperature (350, 450, or 550°C) at a heating ramp of 0.5°C min−1, and held for 6 h in air atmosphere. The resultant samples were marked as P-NFO, S-NFO, or L-NFO according to their respective morphology.
X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker, D8-Advance), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JEOL, SU8010), field-emission transmission electron microscope (FETEM), high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM, Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN), and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis (taken with X-ray spectroscopy attached to the Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN), were employed to characterize the phase and morphological structures. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, TA-Q50) was performed to analyze the thermal stability. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms (Quantachrome, Autosorb-IQ2-VP) was conducted to obtain the physical surface area and pore distribution. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo ESCALAB 250XI) were employed to detect the elemental composition and surface oxidation states of synthesized samples.
Electrochemical performance of as-prepared samples were carried out by assembling standard 2,032 coin cells in an argon-filled glove box with the oxygen and water content below 0.1 ppm. Active materials, super conductive carbon black, and poly(vinyldifluoride) (PVDF, Sigma Aldrich) were mixed in a weight ratio of 7:2:1, dispersed in N-methyl-2-Pyrrolidinone (NMP), then milled for 30 min to form a slurry. The slurry was cast onto copper foil using a doctor blade and vacuum dried at 120°C overnight. 1 M LiPF6 (Sigma Aldrich) in ethylene carbonate (EC, Sigma Aldrich), diethyl carbonate (DEC, Alfa Aesar), and fluorinated ethylene carbonate (FEC, Sigma Aldrich) (volume ratio 6:3:1) was used as the electrolyte. Polypropylene (PP, MTI Cooperation) was used as the separator. For half-cells, a lithium disc (MTI Corporation) was used as the counter electrode. Galvanostatic charge-discharge tests were carried out at room temperature on a battery testing system (LAND Wuhan, China) in a potential range of 0.01–3.00 V (vs. Li/Li+). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on a CHI-660E electrochemical work station. For the full-cells, the cathodes were assembled by mixing LiCoO2 (Sigma Aldrich) with carbon black, and PVDF in a weight ratio of 8:1:1. The electrolytes and separator in full-cells were same as those in the half-cells. Electrochemical performance of full-cells were tested in a voltage window between 1.0 and 3.9 V. The weight ratio of positive materials to negative materials was designed as 4:1. Specific capacity of all the cells was calculated based on only the mass of active materials in anode.
Results and Discussion
Crystallographic structure and purity of the NiFe-PBA precursors were studied by XRD (Figure S1a). All the diffraction peaks match well with fcc Ni3[Fe(CN)6]2 (JCPDS No. 86-0501), suggesting the high purity of NiFe-PBA. The SEM image (Figure S1b) shows that NiFe-PBA are uniform nano-cubes with an average size of ~180 nm and smooth surfaces. The synthesis process of NiFe-PBA was referred to previous literatures (Xuan et al., 2018): the formation of these NiFe-PBA cube is caused by coordinate process between Ni2+ and [Fe(CN)6]3−, and dominated by a kinetically controlled process to obtain uniform cubes (Hu et al., 2013). TGA curve (Figure S2) reveals thermal stability of the NiFe-PBA, which starts to decompose at 252 °C in air. Therefore, the NiFe-PBA was heated in air at 350, 450, or 550 °C to obtain the morphology control of NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures.
The NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures that collected after controllable annealing at different temperatures show distinct nano-architectures (Figure 1a). The sample that annealed at 350°C well retains the cubic shape of the Ni-Fe PBA with a diameter size of ~130 nm. The magnified SEM image (inset Figure 1b) reveals the integrate surface of the P-NFO sample. When elevated the calcination temperature to 450 °C, the size of cubes shrinks further to ~100 nm and hierarchical surfaces are formed, which consist of about 5 nm nanoparticles (inset of Figure 1c). As for the L-NFO, although hierarchical surfaces are still observed, the subunits grow to a larger size of around 12 nm (inset Figure 1d). TEM images (Figures 1e–g) display more morphological details about the samples. The P-NFO shows a highly porous structure with filled internal. Internal cavities are observed in the S-NFO and L-NFO, confirming the formation of hierarchical hollow-nanocubes. Interestingly, besides the particle size of subunit, the internal cavity also grows larger in the L-NFO compared to that of S-NFO sample. The formation of these distinct NiO/NiFe2O4 samples is dominated by two major factors: thermally induced oxidation process of the NiFe-PBA, and further growth of the formed NiO/NiFe2O4 composite (Zhang et al., 2013). In the former, metallic elements in NiFe-PBA react with oxygen to form homogenous NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structure. As the annealing temperature raises to higher value, the rapid mass-transport from core to shell causes the formation of hollow interior in resultant samples (S-NFO and L-NFO) (Guo et al., 2015). Meanwhile, the latter results a further growth of NiO/NiFe2O4 subunits, that following an Oswald ripening process. Therefore, compared with S-NFO, the L-NFO shows a larger interior hollow and bigger subunit size.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration for morphology evaluation of NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures. (b–d) SEM images, (e–g) TEM pictures, and (h–j) N2 isothermals of the P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO, respectively. Insets in (b–d) and (e–g) are the enlarged SEM and TEM images of an individual P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO, respectively.
N2 adsorption-desorption isothermals (Figures 1h–j) of these samples show a similar type form, exhibiting typical IV with H1 hysteresis loops, indicative of their mesoporous structure. The specific surface area is 45.2, 32.1, and 31.3 m2 g−1 for P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO sample, respectively. When increasing the annealing temperature, both the particle size of subunits and interior cavity grow to larger values, therefore, the smallest surface area is observed in the L-NFO sample, which is in agreement with the observation in Figure 1. The narrow and small hysteresis loops also suggest co-existence of macropores in all samples. Notably, the combination of mesopores and macropores can facilitate better penetration of electrolyte, which is an important factor for enhancing the electrochemical performance (Jiang et al., 2018). The pore volume of P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO are 0.204, 0.210, and 0.188 cm3 g−1, respectively. High pore volume of the P-NFO and S-NFO indicates that the good porous feature of NiFe-PBA is well-reserved in both samples. Therefore, NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures with different porosity, particle size, and shell/internal structures are successfully synthesized via a simple controllable annealing process.
Figure 2 presents more structural information about the resultant samples. XRD patterns of the P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO (Figure 2a) match well with crystallographic structure of cubic NiO (JCPDS No. 01-1239) and NiFe2O4 (JCPDS No. 01-074-2081), confirming their hybrid composition. The XRD pattern of S-NFO was selected for GSAS Rietveld refinement to determine the phase content of NiFe2O4 and NiO, as shown in Figure S3. According to the refinement result, the phase content of NiFe2O4 and NiO is determined to be 63 and 37%. The broad diffraction peak of the XRD pattern indicated a smaller particle size. Specifically, the particle size of the P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO is calculated to be 7.67, 5.73, and 13.14 nm, respectively, according to the Scherrer equation based on the peak at 43.4 degree. XPS spectra of the S-NFO are shown in Figures 2b–e. XPS survey reveals the existence of only Ni, Fe, and O elements, suggesting high purity of the S-NFO sample. In the Ni 2p spectrum, the main peak at 855.7 eV (Ni 2p3/2) and the satellite peak at 860.7 eV are the typical Ni2+ bond in NiO and NiFe2O4 (Song et al., 2018). In Figure 2d, the dominate peaks at 710.0 eV, together with the satellite peak are the typical Fe 2p3/2 signal of NiFe2O4 (Gao et al., 2017). For the O1s spectrum, peaks locate at 528.9 and 530.0 eV are assigned to the typical metal-oxygen bonds (Jin et al., 2017). The O1s peak at 532.1 eV is most likely associated with defects and under-coordinated lattice oxygen (Qiu et al., 2015; Yuan et al., 2015). Elemental mapping of an isolated S-NFO nanocube is used to investigate its chemical composition (Figure 2f). The hollow structure of S-NFO is further confirmed by the color contrast between shell (darker) and hollow interior (lighter). Clearly, the S-NFO consists of Ni, Fe, and O elements, and all the elements are homogeneous distributed, indicating homo-distribution of NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures. Taking the Fe mapping for example, the homogenous distribution of Fe in S-NFO is confirmed by the full cover of green dots through the selected cube. Comparing with the intensive part at the edge, these green dots are less intensive in the interior, proving its hollow structural feature. The uniform elemental distribution was also observed in the P-NFO and L-NFO (Figures S4a–f). HR-TEM image in Figure 2g reveals that the S-NFO exhibits a hierarchical structure that is composed of small nanoparticles (~5 nm) as its subunits. The lattice fringes of 0.21 and 0.25 nm can be well indexed to the (200) and (311) lattice planes of cubic NiO and NiFe2O4, revealing the intimate junction between NiO and NiFe2O4. The weight ratio of Ni to Fe in S-NFO was determined to 32: 31 by EDS spectrum (Figure S5). Therefore, the S-NFO consists of 65 wt.% NiFe2O4 and 35 wt.% NiO, similar with the XRD refinement result.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO. Chemical and structural investigation of S-NFO: (b) XPS spectrum, (c–e) high-resolution XPS spectrum for Ni 2p, Fe 2p, and O 1s, (f) EDX elemental mapping, and (g) HR-TEM images.
Electrochemical measurements of the NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures were carried out to clarify the relationship between porosity, particle size and electrochemical performance. The charge-discharge curves of P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO at the first, second, fifth, ninth, and tenth cycle are given in Figures 3A–C. In the first discharge process, all samples exhibit similar profiles with an obvious plateau at ~0.75 V, which shifts to ~1.0 V and remains stable in the subsequent cycles. The upward shifted voltage platform is caused by structural reorganization, new phase formation, and a polarization change of electrodes materials (Zou et al., 2014). The initial discharge capacity of P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO is 1314, 1805, and 813 mAh g−1, respectively. The charge profiles are relatively smooth with two bumps at ~1.3 and 2.3 V, corresponding to the oxidation of Ni0 and Fe0 (Park et al., 2015; Du et al., 2016). The initial charge capacity is 986, 1330, and 701 mAh g−1 for the P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO, corresponding to an initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) of 75, 74, and 86%, respectively. The irreversible capacity loss in the first cycle may be attributed to formation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film, and irreversible side reactions of the NiO/NiFe2O4 composites (Park et al., 2015). The higher ICE value of the L-NFO is due to its smaller surface area, which reduces the formation of the SEI film. In the 10th cycle, the P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO show a stable discharge/charge capacity of 1092/1077, 1539/1501, 814/802 mAh g−1, respectively. The high capacity of S-NFO [theoretical capacity is 846 mAh g−1, 718 × 35% (NiO)+915×65% (NiFe2O4)] is caused by the extra contribution of its nano-subunits, and other factors such as kinetic limitation and/or intrinsic nature of materials (Hou L. et al., 2015; Yuan et al., 2015). Superior electrochemical performance of the S-NFO indicates that the smaller subunits and high porosity play important roles in affecting the Li+ insertion/extraction process (see below for detailed discussions).
Figure 3. (A–C) Charge-discharge profiles of P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO at 100 mA g−1, respectively. (D) Typical cyclic voltammetry curves of S-NFO at a scan rate of 0.5 mV s−1. (E) Rate capability of P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO at various current densities from 1.0 to 20 A g−1 and then back to 1 A g−1. (F) Electrochemical performance comparison of the S-NFO with other Ni-based, Fe-based, and hetero-structure materials.
Figure 3D displays the typical cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of S-NFO at a scan rate of 0.5 mV s−1, which is in accordance with the above charge-discharge profiles. A dominate reduction peak at 0.4 V is observed in the first cathodic sweep, which is assigned to the reduction of NiO and NiFe2O4 according to Equation (1, 2), and the formation of the SEI film (Guo et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2018). The weak and broad peak at 1.1 V might be due to the insertion of Li+ into electrode. In the following cycles, these two peaks shift to higher potential of 0.7 and 1.3 V, indicating irreversible capacity loss. Two peaks at 1.7 and 2.3 V in the anodic sweep are observed, which could be ascribed to the oxidation of Ni0 to Ni2+, and Fe0 to Fe3+, respectively Equations (3,4) (Guo et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2018). The highly overlapped CV curves in the subsequent cycles suggest a good reversibility of the electrochemical reactions.
Significantly improved rate performance is observed in the S-NFO in comparison with P-NFO and L-NFO benchmarks (Figure 3E). As the current density progressively increased from 1.0 to 10 A g−1, the S-NFO delivers high reversible capacities of 1292, 1130, 1004, 856, and 776 mAh g−1 at 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 8.0, and 10 A g−1, respectively. Even at ultrahigh current densities of 15 and 20 A g−1, high capacities of 641 and 522 mAh g−1 are still observed. More importantly, as the current density drops to 1.0 A g−1, discharge capacity of the S-NFO gradually recovers to 1189 mAh g−1 as well. Apparently, the S-NFO shows high capacity retention of 92 % after 130 cycles at various current densities (from 1.0 to 20 A g−1). Such excellent rate performance outperforms not only P-NFO and L-NFO, but also compete with other NiFe2O4 or NiO electrodes (Park et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015; Li C. et al., 2017) and some other TMOs/MTMOs hybrids (Zou et al., 2014; Hou L. et al., 2015; Yuan et al., 2015). Detailed rate capability comparison of this S-NFO with other NiFe2O4 and NiO based electrodes is illustrated in Figure 3F.
The distinct electrochemical performance of P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO hetero-structures may be caused by their different porosity, particle size, and internal structure (Figure 4). For full utilization of active material, a better contact between electrolyte and electrode as well as a shorter path for Li+ transportation is needed. The hollow and hierarchical architecture of S-NFO simultaneously facilitates better electrolyte penetration and Li+ transportation. The small subunits of S-NFO not only effectively shorten the diffusion path of Li+ to improve the kinetics, but also provide more active sites for Li+ storage. Although the L-NFO also possesses a hierarchical hollow structure, its subunits are larger than the S-NFO, corresponding to a longer diffusion distance of Li+, and resulting in poor kinetics and low utilization of electrode, especially at high current densities. After Li+ insertion/extraction cycles, the small cavity in S-NFO may disappear due to the nanosize effect of conversion mechanism and the inevitable volume expansion. Fortunately, the initial small hollow in S-NFO can provide extra room for the inward volume expansion, resulting in a hierarchical cube with well dispersed subunits, which is helpful to stabilize the electrode structure. On the contrary, the lager hollow in L-NFO make the subunit near inner shell lack of confine from the interaction with each other, resulting in a continuous expanding during cycling and finally leading to a structure collapse (Cao et al., 2016). As for the P-NFO, similar volume expansion also occurs, but the filled internal in P-NFO cannot buffer such inward expansion, which causes also structural collapse after many repeated cycles.
Figure 4. Illustration for the insertion and extraction channels of e−/Li+ in P-NFO, S-NFO, and L-NFO, and their corresponding structural evolution.
Further characterizations about the cycle stability of S-NFO at high current densities are carried out (Figures 5a,b). At 5 A g−1, the S-NFO shows high capacity of 1,052 mAh g−1 after 300 cycles, with the CE stabilizes at almost 100 %, suggesting a good structural stability. More impressively, even at ultra-high current density of 20 A g−1, a high reversible capacity of 344 mAh g−1 is still delivered after 2,000 cycles, corresponding to only 0.018 % capacity decay per cycle. The rapid capacity decay during the initial 200 cycles and the continuous capacity growth in the following cycles are normally observed for conversion type anodes, which may be due to the reversible formation of a polymeric gel-like film and activation process (Jing et al., 2014). Structural stability of the S-NFO electrode is also investigated. As demonstrated in Figures 5c,d, the nanocube morphology is still well embedded in the electrode after 2,000 cycles and no obvious agglomeration or pulverization is observed after such long cycles. The corresponding post-cycled CV plots are presented in Figure S6, consistent with Figure 3D, implying the high electrochemical reversibility of S-NFO electrode. Therefore, it is reasonable to deduce that the small particle size and interior cavity of S-NFO can provide more room to buffer the volume changes during cycling, which benefits the structural stability and thus leads to better cycling performance.
Figure 5. (a,b) Cycling stability of S-NFO electrode at 5.0 and 20 A g−1. (c,d) SEM images of the S-NFO electrode after 2,000 cycles.
Effect of particle size on electrochemical kinetics of electrode is investigated by Nyquist plots (Figure 6A). The depressed semicircle in high frequency is related to charge transfer resistance of electrodes (Rct), and the inclined straight line in low frequency is associated with the mass transfer property. The Rct value in S-NFO and L-NFO is calculated based on an equivalent circuit as shown in Figure S7, whereas Rs, CPE, and Wo corresponds to the resistance of electrolyte, the constant phase elements, and the Warburg impedance, respectively. Clearly, the Rct value of S-NFO electrode (192 Ω) is smaller than that of L-NFO (295 Ω), indicating faster kinetics of charge transfer. Therefore, small particle size can promote faster ion/electron transportation is confirmed, which is beneficial for good utilization of electrode at high currents. Figure 6B compares the Nyquist plot of the S-NFO after different cycles. The decreased Rct in the initial ten cycles may be ascribed to the formation of a conductive intermediate (Hu et al., 2015). No obvious change is found between the 10th and 2000th cycles (Figure S8), indicating the well preservation of kinetic superiority after the long-term cycles. The larger Rct of L-NFO is in consistent with its structure, which features longer diffusion distance, as illustrated in Figure 4. Moreover, there is a profound difference among the phase angel of S-NFO, and L-NFO. Generally, the more vertical the phase angle is, the more capacitive behavior there is. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate the existence of capacitive behavior in the S-NFO electrode.
Figure 6. (A) Kinetics characterization of the as-assembled S-NFO, and L-NFO half-cells, at an open-potential of ~2.8 V, (B) Nyquist plots of S-NFO at the 1th, 10th, and 2000th cycle, tested after charging to 2.8 V. (C) CV curves of S-NFO at different sweep rate. (D) Capacitive contribution of S-NFO.
The CV curves of S-NFO electrode at different sweep rates (0.5 ~ 1.2 mV s−1, Figure 6C) are used to determine its capacitive behavior. As shown in Figure 6D, about 86% faction of the total charge roots from the capacitive process according to the calculation method previously reported (Wang et al., 2016). Such high percentage of capacitance behavior contributes to the excellent rate performance and cycle stability of S-NFO. The extraordinary electrochemical performance of this S-NFO demonstrates its huge potential for fast Li ion storage.
To verify the practical application of this S-NFO, full-cells are assembled by using the S-NFO as anode and commercial LiCoO2 as cathode, as demonstrated in Figure 7A. An LED array with JSNU logo that is consisted of 33 red LEDs in parallel was powered by an S-NFO based full-cell. As shown in Figure 7B, the whole LED array could be easily lighted up, demonstrating the viability and practical applications of this S-NFO electrode material. Charge-discharge curves of the full-cells at 0.1 A g−1 in a voltage range of 1.0–3.9 V were presented in Figure 7C. In the first cycle, a charge/discharge capacity of 961/737 mAh g−1 is delivered, corresponding to an ICE value of 76.7%. About 97.2% capacity was retained in the second cycle. Rate performance of the full-cells was tested at various current densities, as shown in Figure 7D. When increasing the current density from 0.1 to 3.0 A g−1, a high reversible capacity of 649, 572, and 500 mAh g−1 was delivered at 0.5, 1.0 and 3.0 A g−1, respectively. As the current density drops back to 0.1 A g−1, 98.1% capacity was recovered, implying the high reversibility of full-cells. Cycling performance of the full cells was carried out at 0.5 A g−1 after activating at 0.1 A g−1 for three cycles (Figure S9), which shows a reversible capacity of 300 mAh g−1 at the end of 50 cycles.
Figure 7. (A) Illustration of the full cell using LiCoO2 as cathode and S-NFO as anode. (B) Digital photo of an LED array that is powered by the S-NFO based full cell. (C,D) Charge-discharge plots of the S-NFO based full-cells at 0.1 A g−1 and at various current densities of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0 A g−1, respectively.
In summary, by combining the advantages of hetero-structure and nano-architecture, the electrochemical performance of NiFe2O4/NiO hybrid material is significantly improved. A series of NiO/NiFe2O4 hetero-structures with different porosity, particle size, and shell/internal structures has been synthesized and investigated as anode materials for ultra-fast LIBs. Experimental results highlights the interactions between structural geometry and electrochemical behavior, demonstrating that hetero-structure phase, small particles size, and high porosity offer obvious advantages in improving the Li+ storage property. By optimizing these factors, faster electrochemical kinetics and long-term cycling stability have been achieved in the S-NFO electrode. Impressive rate performance and cycle stability at high current densities are observed in the S-NFO sample, which retains 1,052 and 344 mAh g−1 after 300 and 2,000 cycles at 5.0 and 20 A g−1, respectively. The post-cycled SEM images demonstrate the well-reserved structural durability of this unique electrode. The results here may shed light on further design and fabrication of other high performance micro-nanostructured materials for energy storage and conversion technologies.
YingW conducted the experiments and helped writing the manuscript. SW helped operating experiments and data analysis. YijingW, CW, and XH supervised this research work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21805117), Jiangsu Province Science Foundation for Youths (BK20181014), and The Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 18KJB150015).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00654/full#supplementary-material
Cao, K., Jiao, L., Xu, H., Liu, H., Kang, H., Zhao, Y., et al. (2016). Reconstruction of mini-hollow polyhedron Mn2O3 derived from MOFs as a high-performance lithium anode material. Adv. Sci. 3:1500185. doi: 10.1002/advs.201500185
Chen, J. Y., Wu, X. F., Tan, Q. Q., and Chen, Y. F. (2018). Designed synthesis of ultrafine NiO nanocrystals bonded on a three dimensional graphene framework for high-capacity lithium-ion batteries. New J. Chem. 42, 9901–9910. doi: 10.1039/c8nj01330f
Chen, W., Li, T., Hu, Q., Li, C., and Guo, H. (2015). Hierarchical CoS2@C hollow microspheres constructed by nanosheets with superior lithium storage. J. Power Sources 286, 159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.154
Du, D., Yue, W., Fan, X., Tang, K., and Yang, X. (2016). Ultrathin NiO/NiFe2O4nanoplates decorated graphene nanosheets with enhanced lithium storage properties. Electrochim. Acta 194, 17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.085
Gang, H., Feifei, Z., Xinchuan, D., Jianwei, W., Dongming, Y., and Limin, W. (2014). Core–Shell NiFe2O4@TiO2nanorods: an anode material with enhanced electrochemical performance for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 11214–11219. doi: 10.1002/chem.201403148
Gao, X. J., Wang, J. W., Zhang, D., Nie, K. Q., Ma, Y. Y., Zhong, J., et al. (2017). Hollow NiFe2O4 nanospheres on carbon nanorods as a highly efficient anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 5007–5012. doi: 10.1039/c6ta11058d
Goriparti, S., Miele, E., De Angelis, F., Di Fabrizio, E., Zaccaria, R. P., Capiglia, C., et al. (2014). Review on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 257, 421–443. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.103
Guo, H., Li, T., Chen, W., Liu, L., Qiao, J., and Zhang, J. (2015). Self-assembly formation of hollow Ni-Fe-O nanocage architectures by metal-organic frameworks with high-performance lithium storage. Sci. Rep. 5:13310. doi: 10.1038/srep13310
Han, X., Cheng, F., Zhang, T., Yang, J., Hu, Y., and Chen, J. (2014). Hydrogenated uniform Pt clusters supported on porous CaMnO3 as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for enhanced oxygen reduction and evolution. Adv. Mater. 26, 2047–2051. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304867
Han, X., He, G., He, Y., Zhang, J., Zheng, X., Li, L., et al. (2018). Engineering catalytic active sites on cobalt oxide surface for enhanced oxygen electrocatalysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 8:1702222. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702222
Han, X., Wu, X., Zhong, C., Deng, Y., Zhao, N., and Hu, W. (2017). NiCo2S4 nanocrystals anchored on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as a highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for rechargeable zinc-air batteries. Nano Energy 31, 541–550. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.008
Hou, H., Banks, C. E., Jing, M., Zhang, Y., and Ji, X. (2015). Carbon quantum dots and their derivative 3D porous carbon frameworks for sodium-ion batteries with ultralong cycle life. Adv. Mater. 27, 7861–7866. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503816
Hou, H., Shao, L., Zhang, Y., Zou, G., Chen, J., and Ji, X. (2016). Large-area carbon nanosheets doped with phosphorus: a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Sci. 4:1600243. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600243
Hou, L., Lian, L., Zhang, L., Pang, G., Yuan, C., and Zhang, X. (2015). Self-sacrifice template fabrication of hierarchical mesoporous bi-component-active ZnO/ZnFeO sub-microcubes as superior anode towards high-performance lithium-ion battery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 238–246. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201402827
Hu, M., Ishihara, S., Ariga, K., Imura, M., and Yamauchi, Y. (2013). Kinetically controlled crystallization for synthesis of monodispersed coordination polymer nanocubes and their self-assembly to periodic arrangements. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 1882–1885. doi: 10.1002/chem.201203138
Huang, G., Zhang, F., Zhang, L., Du, X., Wang, J., and Wang, L. (2014). Hierarchical NiFe2O4/Fe2O3 nanotubes derived from metal organic frameworks for superior lithium ion battery anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 8048–8053. doi: 10.1039/C4TA00200H
Huang, J., Wei, Z., Liao, J., Ni, W., Wang, C., and Ma, J. (in press). Molybdenum tungsten chalcogenides for lithium/sodium-ion batteries: beyond MoS2. J. Energy Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.09.001
Hui, C., Siqi, Z., Chao, Y., Ruiqi, B., Liuniu, T., Linrui, H., et al. (2016). Metal-organic-framework-derived two-dimensional ultrathin mesoporous hetero-ZnFe2O4/ZnO nanosheets with enhanced lithium storage properties for Li-ion batteries. Nanotechnology 27:465402. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/46/465402
Jiang, H., Liu, X. C., Wu, Y., Shu, Y., Gong, X., Ke, F., et al. (2018). Metal-organic frameworks for high charge-discharge rates in lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 130, 3980–3985. doi: 10.1002/ange.201712872
Jiang, T., Bu, F., Feng, X., Shakir, I., Hao, G., and Xu, Y. (2017). Porous Fe2O3 nanoframeworks encapsulated within three-dimensional graphene as high-performance flexible anode for lithium-ion battery. ACS Nano 11, 5140–5147. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b02198
Jin, R., Wang, Q., Cui, Y., and Zhang, S. (2017). MFe2O4 (M = Ni, Co) nanoparticles anchored on amorphous carbon coated multiwalled carbon nanotubes as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 123, 448–459. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.092
Jing, B., Xiaogang, L., Guangzeng, L., Yitai, Q., and Shenglin, X. (2014). Unusual formation of ZnCo2O4 3D hierarchical twin microspheres as a high-rate and ultralong-life lithium-ion battery anode material. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 3012–3020. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201303442
Li, C., Wang, X., Li, S., Li, Q., Xu, J., Liu, X., et al. (2017). Optimization of NiFe2O4/rGO composite electrode for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Sur. Sci. 416, 308–317. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.093
Li, D., Li, G., Ge, H., Zhang, J., and Meng, X. (2017). Fabrication of CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 nanoporous spheres as promising anodes for high performance lithium-ion batteries. New J. Chem. 41, 15501–15507. doi: 10.1039/C7NJ03324A
Li, L., Cheah, Y., Ko, Y., Teh, P., Wee, G., Wong, C., Peng, S., et al. (2013). The facile synthesis of hierarchical porous flower-like NiCo2O4 with superior lithium storage properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 10935–10941. doi: 10.1039/C3TA11549F
Liang, J., Wei, Z., Wang, C., and Ma, J. (2018). Vacancy-induced sodium-ion storage in N-doped carbon Nanofiber@MoS2 nanosheet arrays. Electrochim. Acta 285, 301–308, doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.230
Lina, Q., Xianhua, H., Xiyan, H., Qian, L., Qiang, R., Bo, W., et al. (2017). Self-assembled porous NiFe2O4floral microspheres inlaid on ultrathin flake graphite as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. ChemElectroChem 4, 3148–3155. doi: 10.1002/celc.201700862
Pagot, G., Bertasi, F., Nawn, G., Negro, E., Bach Delpeuch, A., et al. (2017), Effect of graphite copper oxide on the performance of high potential Li[Fe1/3Ni1/3Co1/3]PO4 olivine cathodes for lithium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 225, 533–542. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.149
Park, G. D., Cho, J. S., and Kang, Y. C. (2015). Multiphase and double-layer NiFe2O4@NiO-flollow-nanospheredecorated reduced graphene oxide composite powders prepared by spray pyrolysis applying nanoscale kirkendall diffusion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 16842–16849. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b04891
Peng, S., Li, L., Hu, Y., Srinivasan, M., Cheng, F., Chen, J., et al. (2015). Fabrication of spinel one-dimensional architectures by single-spinneret electrospinning for energy storage applications. ACS Nano 9, 1945–1954. doi: 10.1021/nn506851x
Poizot, P., Laruelle, S., Grugeon, S., Dupont, L., and Tarascon, J. M. (2000).Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature 407, 496–499. doi: 10.1038/35035045
Qiu, S., Lu, G., Liu, J., Lyu, H., Hu, C., Li, B., Yan, X., et al. (2015). Enhanced electrochemical performances of MoO2 nanoparticles composited with carbon nanotubes for lithium-ion battery anodes. RSC Adv. 5, 87286–87294. doi: 10.1039/c5ra17147d
Shen, X., Liu, H., Cheng, X. B., Yan, C., and Huang, J. Q. (2018). Beyond lithium ion batteries: higher energy density battery systems based on lithium metal anodes. Energy Storage Mater. 12, 161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.12.002
Shi, W., Zhang, Y., Key, J., and Shen, P. K. (2018). Three-dimensional graphene sheets with NiO nanobelt outgrowths for enhanced capacity and long term high rate cycling Li-ion battery anode material. J. Power Sources 379, 362–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.025
Song, X. Z., Sun, F. F., Dai, S. T., Lin, X., Sun, K. M., and Wang, X. F. (2018). Hollow NiFe2O4 microspindles derived from Ni/Fe bimetallic MOFs for highly sensitive acetone sensing at low operating temperatures. Inorg. Chem. Front. 5, 1107–1114. doi: 10.1039/c8qi00043c
Tingting, Z., Zhen, C., Houyi, M., and Xizheng, L. (2017). In situ fabrication of hierarchical porous CoO/Cu2O composites on cu foam as high-performance freestanding anodes for lithium–ion batteries. Energy Tech. 5, 1720–1727. doi: 10.1002/ente.201700096
Wang, Y., Wang, B. F., Xiao, F., Huang, Z. G., Wang, Y. J., Richardson, C., et al. (2015b). Facile synthesis of nanocage Co3O4 for advanced lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 298, 203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.014
Wang, Y., Wang, C. Y., Wang, Y. J., Liu, H. K., and Huang, Z. G. (2016). Superior sodium-ion storage performance of Co3O4@nitrogen-doped carbon: derived from a metal-organic framework. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 5428–5435. doi: 10.1039/c6ta00236f
Wei, Z., Wang, L., Zhuo, M., Ni, W., Wang, H., and Ma, J. (2018). Layered tin sulfide and selenide anode materials for Li- and Na-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 12185–12214. doi: 10.1039/C8TA02695E
Xu, Q. T., Li, J. C., Xue, H. G., and Guo, S. P. (2018). Binary iron sulfides as anode materials for rechargeable batteries: Crystal structures, syntheses, and electrochemical performance. J. Power Sources 379, 41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.022
Xuan, C. J., Wang, J., Xia, W. W., Zhu, J., Peng, Z. K., and Xia, K. D. (2018). Heteroatom (P, B, or S) incorporated NiFe-based nanocubes as efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 7062–7069. doi: 10.1039/c8ta00410b
Yin, X., Chen, H., Zhi, C., Sun, W., Lv, L. P., and Wang, Y. (2018). Functionalized graphene quantum dot modification of yolk-shell NiO microspheres for superior lithium storage. Small 14:e1800589. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800589
Yu, H., Fan, H., Yadian, B., Tan, H., Liu, W., Hng, H. H., et al. (2015). General approach for MOF-derived porous spinel AFe2O4 hollow structures and their superior lithium storage properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 26751–26757. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b08741
Yuan, C., Cao, H., Zhu, S., Hua, H., and Hou, L. (2015). Core-shell ZnO/ZnFe2O4@C mesoporous nanospheres with enhanced lithium storage properties towards high-performance Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A3, 20389–20398. doi: 10.1039/C5TA05984D
Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Luo, L., Zhao, B., Luo, H., and Han, X. (2018). Harnessing the concurrent reaction dynamics in active Si and Ge to achieve high performance lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 669–681. doi: 10.1039/C8EE00239H
Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Fu, D., Chen, J., et al. (2018). In situ fabrication of heterostructure on nickel foam with tuned composition for enhancing water-splitting performance. Small. 14:e1803666. doi: 10.1002/smll.201803666
Zheng, Z., Zao, Y., Zhang, Q., Cheng, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, K., et al. (2018). Robust erythrocyte-like Fe2O3@carbon with yolk-shell structures as high-performance anode for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 347, 563–573. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.119
Zhou, K. Q., Kang, M. L., He, X. Q., Hong, Z. S., Huang, Z. G., and Wei, M. D. (2017). A multi-functional gum arabic binder for NiFe2O4 nanotube anodes enabling excellent Li/Na-ion storage performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 18138–18147. doi: 10.1039/c7ta05219g
Keywords: lithium ion battery, NiO/NiFe2O4, morphology control, hetero-structure, electrochemical performance
Citation: Wang Y, Wu S, Wang C, Wang Y and Han X (2019) Morphology Controllable Synthesis of NiO/NiFe2O4 Hetero-Structures for Ultrafast Lithium-Ion Battery. Front. Chem. 6:654. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00654
Received: 26 September 2018; Accepted: 17 December 2018;
Published: 10 January 2019.
Edited by:Jiexi Wang, Central South University, China
Reviewed by:Hongshuai Hou, Central South University, China
Shengjie Peng, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China
Jianmin Ma, Hunan University, China
Vito Di Noto, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
Copyright © 2019 Wang, Wu, Wang, Wang and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.