Conformation Control of Iminodibenzyl-Based Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Material by Tilted Face-to-Face Alignment With Optimal Distance (tFFO) Design

Introduction

Emitting materials for organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) have, in recent years, been actively investigated to improve the utilization of triplet excitons. Significant efforts have been devoted to the development of thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) materials (Yang et al., 2017), as they have been demonstrated to convert 100% of both singlet and triplet excitons into light in the absence of any metal atoms in their molecular structures (Uoyama et al., 2012; Kaji et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016). Hence, TADF materials are expected to be widely applied as alternative emitters to the conventional fluorescence and phosphorescence materials. To realize efficient TADF, the reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) from the lowest triplet state (T₁) to the lowest excited singlet state (S₁) should be fast. Basically, effective RISC is expected by minimizing the energy difference between S₁ and T₁, namely, ΔE_ST. This can be realized simply by splitting the distribution of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), in most cases resulting in charge transfer (CT) type S₁ and T₁ (¹CT and ³CT, respectively; Endo et al., 2011). Consequently, many of the reported TADF materials are composed of donor and acceptor moieties, i.e., D-A type molecules (Yang et al., 2017). Nevertheless, small ΔE_ST is not sufficient to achieve a very large RISC rate constant, k_RISC, typically >10⁶ s⁻¹. Notably, incorporation of locally excited triplet states (³LE) close in energy to the ¹CT and ³CT states is one of the most promising approaches to accelerate RISC (Dias et al., 2016; Etherington et al., 2016; Gibson et al., 2016; Marian, 2016; Hosokai et al., 2017; Lyskov and Marian, 2017; Samanta et al., 2017; Noda et al., 2018). We have recently proposed a new molecular design principle, namely, tilted face-to-face alignment with optimal distance (tFFO) (Wada et al., 2020). In the tFFO molecular design, the degeneration of the three energy levels, i.e., ¹CT, ³CT, and ³LE, can be realized with a significant spin–orbit coupling matrix element value (SOCMEV) between the singlet and triplet states, resulting in efficient RISC. The energy level matching of the three levels can be accomplished by optimizing the distance between the electron donor and acceptor fragments (d_DA). Moreover, SOCMEV can be enhanced by tilting the donor and acceptor fragments from the completely parallel face-to-face alignment. On the basis of the tFFO concept, we developed a through-space type molecule, namely, TpAT-tFFO, which was demonstrated to realize very large k_RISC > 10⁷ s⁻¹, despite being composed of only H, C, and N atoms.

In the present study, we report another tFFO-based molecule possessing a triptycene (Tp) scaffold, TpIBT-tFFO (Figure 1A, left), which is composed of 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[b, f ]azepine (iminodibenzyl, IB) and 2,4-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazine (T) as the donor and acceptor, respectively. For comparison, a molecule comprising IB and T units, IB-TRZ (Figure 1A, right), which was first reported by Huang et al. (2019), was also synthesized as a conventional through-bond D-A type molecule for comparison. As shown later, IB-TRZ has two conformational isomers (Figure 1B), resulting in dual emission. Kukhta et al. first reported on iminodibenzyl-containing TADF molecules, providing evidence for the existence of two conformers (Kukhta et al., 2018). On the other hand, excellent packing in the tFFO systems can fix the D and A conformations, leading to single-peaked emission for TpIBT-tFFO, which is an additional intriguing feature of tFFO molecular design. A large k_RISC of 6.9 × 10⁶ s⁻¹ was obtained for TpIBT-tFFO, which is one of the highest k_RISC values for molecules composed of only H, C, and N atoms (The highest reported value is also for a tFFO-based molecule; Wada et al., 2020).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. (A) Chemical structures of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ. (B) DFT-optimized geometries of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ.

Results and Discussion

The details concerning the synthesis and characterization of both TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ are provided in the Supplementary Material.

Calculations

We performed density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level to optimize the ground state (S₀) geometries utilizing Gaussian 16. Figure 1B demonstrates the optimized molecular geometries of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ. For IB-TRZ, two energetically stable conformers were found depending on the initial conformations. One is a quasi-equatorial conformation, named IB-TRZ-E, where the donor and acceptor fragments are perpendicular to each other, while the other is quasi-axial, denoted as IB-TRZ-A. The total energy of IB-TRZ-E was 0.324 eV larger than that of IB-TRZ-A. The donor and acceptor segments of IB-TRZ-A are also nearly perpendicular to each other, however, in a different direction. The nitrogen atom in the IB units is not sp³- but sp²-hybridized in both conformers. The nitrogen and the directly bonded three carbon atoms form not a pyramidal, but a planar structure. The donor of IB-TRZ-A, IB, exhibits a butterfly shape bended in the middle (Figure 2), while TpIBT-tFFO has only one geometry, corresponding to an equatorial conformation. To visually demonstrate the difference between TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ-E (or -A), the overlap views of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ-E as well as of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ-A are illustrated in Figures 2A,B, respectively. As can be seen, the IB units of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ-E are well overlapped, while the IB moieties of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ-A are significantly deviated. The nearest inter-atomic distance between IB in the axial conformation and T is too close; thus, the axial conformation in the tFFO type molecule is physically impossible, as evidenced in Figure 2B. For the optimized structure, DFT and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations at the LC-ωPBE/6-31+G(d) level were also performed to estimate the energy levels of the HOMO, LUMO, and excited states more adequately. Here, ω is the optimized range-separation parameter of the LC-ωPBE functional, employed to precisely predict the excited state energies of the TADF materials. The optimized ω for TpIBT-tFFO was determined according to a previously reported method (Sun et al., 2015). Table 1 summarizes the calculation results of the HOMO and LUMO distributions, energy levels of the HOMO, LUMO, S₁, and T₁ as well as ΔE_ST for TpIBT-tFFO, IB-TRZ-E, and IB-TRZ-A. The HOMO and LUMO distributions were significantly different between IB-TRZ-E and IB-TRZ-A, in which the central phenylene ring was included in the LUMO and HOMO, respectively. The HOMO/LUMO energy levels were −6.70/−0.99 and −6.91/−0.75 eV for IB-TRZ-E and IB-TRZ-A, correspondingly. Furthermore, the S₁ and T₁ energy levels and the resulting ΔE_ST exhibited large differences (the ΔE_STs of IB-TRZ-E and IB-TRZ-A were 0.30 and 0.81 eV, respectively). In the case of TpIBT-tFFO, HOMO and LUMO were well spatially separated. On the basis of the calculated ΔE_ST of 0.032 eV, TpIBT-tFFO is expected to be a promising TADF emitter. More importantly, the T₂ state lies closely above the S₁ state (specifically, 0.0006 eV above). We also theoretically calculated the energy difference, ΔE_ST, those from ³CT to ¹CT, ΔE (³CT → ¹CT), and from ³LE to ¹CT, ΔE (³LE → ¹CT) as a function of the distance between the donor (IB) and acceptor (T), d_DA (Figure 3). The calculations for the oscillator strength (f) are also shown. Here, d_DA is defined as the distance between the nitrogen atom in IB and the carbon atom in T. Excellent energy level matching of ¹CT, ³CT, and ³LE, is achieved at approximately d_DA = 4.5–5 Å. Using a triptycene scaffold, we realized the d_DA of 4.76 Å, which resulted in excellent energy matching of the three states within 0.04 eV. We also carried out SOCMEV calculations employing the ADF2018 package based on the Brédas' calculation level (Samanta et al., 2017). The LCY-ωPBE functional as well as Slater-type all-electron TZP were used with the range parameter, γ (Akinaga and Ten-no, 2008), which was optimized at 0.21. TpIBT-tFFO exhibited SOCMEVs of 0.02 and 0.46 between S₁ and T₁, and between S₁ and T₂, respectively (Table S1). The SOCMEV between S₁ and T₂ was large owing to the tilted IB and T alignments created by the Tp scaffold, where the tilt angle of TpIBT-tFFO was ~20°.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Overlap views of (A) TpIBT-tFFO (red) and IB-TRZ-E (blue) as well as (B) TpIBT-tFFO (red) and IB-TRZ-A (blue). All structures are DFT-optimized.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Distributions of the HOMO and LUMO, energy levels of HOMO, LUMO, ΔE_ST, S₁, and T₁ of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ calculated at LC-ωPBE/6-31+G(d).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. (A) The structures of the IB donor and T acceptor. (B) Calculated energy differences, ΔE_ST, ΔE (³CT → ¹CT) and ΔE (³LE → ¹CT) (top) and f-values (bottom) as a function of d_DA for the combination of IB and T. Green dashed line indicates d_DA of TpIBT-tFFO (4.76 Å).

Thermal and Photophysical Properties

The TGA curves of both TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ are provided in Figure S3. The decomposition temperatures, T_ds, of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ were determined at 396 and 386°C, respectively, from the 5% weight loss point of the TGA curve. Figure 4 shows the ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of IB-TRZ and TpIBT-tFFO in 10⁻⁴ M toluene solutions. IB-TRZ exhibited dual emission with the first and second peak maximum wavelength (λ_MAX) of 417 and 474 nm, respectively, while TpIBT-tFFO displayed single-peaked emission with λ_MAX of 485 nm. Considering the above calculation results, the emissions of IB-TRZ at shorter and longer wavelengths were rationally assigned to IB-TRZ-A and IB-TRZ-E, correspondingly. The assignment was further confirmed by transient PL experiments described below. To investigate the TADF performance of IB-TRZ and TpIBT-tFFO, we carried out PL quantum yield (PLQY) measurements for the toluene solution under O₂ or Ar bubbling for 15 min. In the case of IB-TRZ, the PLQY differed: 11.0% (O₂) and 26.1% (Ar). On the other hand, the PLQY of TpIBT-tFFO in the toluene solution considerably increased from 1.1% (O₂) to 52.4% (Ar). This is a typical feature of tFFO type molecules, which exhibit significantly larger k_ISC and k_RISC than $k_{\text{r}}^{\text{S}}$ and $k_{\text{nr}}^{\text{S}}$ (Wada et al., 2020). Here, k_ISC, $k_{\text{r}}^{\text{S}}$, and $k_{\text{nr}}^{\text{S}}$ indicate the rate constants of intersystem crossing, radiative decay from S₁, and non-radiative decay from S₁, respectively. Considering that O₂ molecules behave as triplet quenchers, these outcomes indicate that a triplet state was strongly involved in the TpIBT-tFFO emission process. To determine ΔE_ST experimentally, we performed a PL measurement at 77 K (Figure S4). In most cases, ΔE_ST of the TADF materials was established based on the energy difference between the onset of the PL (fluorescence) spectrum at RT and that of the PL (phosphorescence) spectrum at low temperature. According to this procedure, we obtained a negative ΔE_ST of −0.13 eV for TpIBT-tFFO. Previously, negative ΔE_ST values for TADF molecules has been reported in some articles (Di et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2018; Braveenth et al., 2019); however, the Arrhenius plots of k_ISC and k_RISC provided positive ΔE_ST, 0.0061 eV (the difference of activation energies for RISC and ISC, see Table 4 below), although the value was obtained for solid film sample. We speculate that the negative value obtained from the above procedure might be a consequence of smaller structural relaxations after vertical excitation from S₀ at 77 K than at RT. Another possible origin would be different S₀ structures between the vertical transitions from S₁ and from T₁. Thus, we determined ΔE_ST based on the energy difference between the onset of the steady state PL spectrum at 77 K (corresponding to S₁, the spectrum also includes phosphorescence but the onset is determined by S₁.) and that of the integrated PL spectrum from 1 to 10 ms at 77 K (corresponding to T₁). We believe that this is a more reasonable approach to establish ΔE_ST experimentally. The ΔE_ST values of IB-TRZ and TpIBT-tFFO were determined at 0.41 and 0.0076 eV, respectively (Table 2). These experimentally-determined values reasonably reflect the calculated ones (Table 1) and the value estimated from the Arrhenius plots. To understand the dual emissions of IB-TRZ, we performed a transient PL measurement for the solution. Figure S5C shows the transient PL decay curves of IB-TRZ observed at 400 and 500 nm, which were used to monitor the emission from IB-TRZ-A and IB-TRZ-E, respectively. For IB-TRZ, the PL decay curves with the lifetime of prompt fluorescence, τ_p, of 3.3 and 10.9 ns were observed at 400 and 500 nm, respectively. Table 3 summarizes the obtained photophysical parameters. Time-dependent PL spectra evidently revealed that IB-TRZ exhibits two different emissions as discussed later (Figures 5A,B). Moreover, no clear delayed fluorescence with the μs-order lifetime was found in IB-TRZ. In the case of TpIBT-tFFO, in addition to normal (prompt) fluorescence with a lifetime of 11.7 ns, delayed fluorescence with a lifetime of 2.5 μs was also clearly observed following Ar gas bubbling (Figure S5D). The lifetime of the prompt component was in good agreement with that of IB-TRZ-E (10.9 ns). The emission of TpIBT-tFFO was primarily composed of the delayed component, which disappeared after O₂ gas bubbling (Figure S5B). From the PLQY and transient PL measurements of TpIBT-tFFO, 93.6% of the total PLQY was attributed to the delayed emission. These results indicate that TpIBT-tFFO is a TADF-active emitter. The k_ISC and k_RISC values of TpIBT-tFFO were experimentally determined at 7.4 × 10⁷ s⁻¹ and 6.9 × 10⁶ s⁻¹, respectively, utilizing our previously reported method (Wada et al., 2020). The large k_RISC value is by virtue of the tFFO design.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. UV-vis absorption (black) of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ and the PL spectra of TpIBT-tFFO (red) and IB-TRZ (blue) in a toluene solution (10⁻⁴ M).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Experimentally obtained thermal properties, energy levels of HOMO, LUMO, E_g, S₁, T₁, and ΔE_ST for TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Photophysical parameters of λ_MAX, Φ_PL, τ_p, τ_d, k_ISC, and k_RISC for TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Time-dependent PL measurements of (A) IB-TRZ in a toluene solution, (B) 9 vol% IB-TRZ:CzSi film, and (C) 9 vol% TpIBT-tFFO:CzSi film. Contour plots of the PL spectra as a function of time (top) and time-dependent PL spectra (bottom) are provided.

To investigate the TADF characteristics of IB-TRZ and TpIBT-tFFO in amorphous films, IB-TRZ and TpIBT-tFFO were doped into the host matrix. For this purpose, 9-(4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)-3,6-bis(triphenylsilyl)-9H-carbazole (CzSi) with high T₁ energy of 3.02 eV was used as the host to confine the triplet energies of IB-TRZ and TpIBT-tFFO. Figure S6A illustrates the PL spectrum of the 9 vol% IB-TRZ:CzSi film. Unlike the spectrum in solution (Figure S5A), seemingly one peak top at approximately 421 nm was observed. The transient PL experiment (Figure S6C) demonstrated different τ_p of 2.9 and 5.2 ns at 400 and 500 nm, respectively. The time-dependent PL spectrum shown in Figure 5B confirmed that the PL spectrum was composed of two different emissions. The distinct two peak tops were not found because the emission wavelength with longer τ_p in the film came closer to that with shorter τ_p (452 and 423 nm, respectively), compared to the case in solution (485 and 418 nm, respectively). The value of longer τ_p in the film (5.2 ns) was also closer to that of shorter τ_p (2.9 ns) compared to the solution case (10.9 and 3.3 ns, respectively). These results indicate that the component with the emission wavelength of 452 nm in the film originated from IB-TRZ with the intermediate structure between quasi-equatorial and quasi-axial conformers.

Meanwhile, the 9 vol%TpIBT-tFFO:CzSi film exhibited a PL spectrum with λ_MAX of 477 nm (Figure S6B), which was composed of only one emission, as evidenced by the transient PL experiment demonstrated in Figure 5C. The emission wavelength of 477 nm was also consistent with that in the solution. Analogously to the solution case, two clear exponential decays with the lifetimes of 24.5 ns and 6.7 μs were observed (Figure S6D), and the emission spectra in TpIBT-tFFO did not change with time (Figure 5C), confirming the TADF character of TpIBT-tFFO. These results indicate that the molecular conformation can be effectively controlled in the tFFO system, resulting in single-peaked emission. Under N₂ gas flow, the PLQY of the 9 vol% TpIBT-tFFO:CzSi film was relatively high (71.4%) compared with that of the 9 vol% IB-TRZ:CzSi film (23.5%). The higher PLQY is a result of the availability of efficient RISC in TpIBT-tFFO. We also carried out temperature-dependent transient PL measurements to examine the energy level matching of the excited states in TpIBT-tFFO (Figure 6). From the Arrhenius plots of k_ISC and k_RISC, activation energies for ISC (E_ISC) and RISC (E_RISC) were determined at 0.0305 and 0.0366 eV, respectively. Combined with the calculation results described above, we established the experimental energy differences between S₁ and T₂ [ΔE (S₁↔T₂)] as well as between T₁ and T₂ [ΔE (T₁↔T₂)] (Table 4). Excellent energy level matching of the three states was successfully realized in TpIBT-tFFO.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. PL decay curves of the 9 vol% TpIBT-tFFO:CzSi film observed at 470 nm from 200 to 300 K.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Energy differences of T₁ and T₂ [ΔE (T₁↔T₂)] and S₁ and T₂[ΔE (S₁↔T₂)] for TpIBT-tFFO obtained experimentally and via a DFT calculation.

Electroluminescence Performance

From the photophysical observations, we established that TpIBT-tFFO is a promising TADF emitter exhibiting high triplet-to-singlet conversion efficiency. This motivated us to fabricate TpIBT-tFFO-based OLED. For comparison, we also fabricated IB-TRZ-based OLED. Figure 7A shows the device structure, indium tin oxide (ITO) (50 nm)/1,1-bis[4-[N, N-di(p-tolyl)amino]phenyl]cyclohexane (TAPC) (60 nm)/1,3-bis(9,9-dimethylacridin-10(9H)-yl)benzene (mAP) (10 nm)/9 vol% IB-TRZ or TpIBT-tFFO:CzSi (20 nm)/2,8-bis(diphenylphosphoryl)dibenzo[b,d]furan (PPF) (10 nm)/1,3-bis[3,5-di(pyridin-3-yl)phenyl]benzene (BmPyPhB) (30 nm)/lithium quinolin-8-olate (Liq) (1 nm)/Al (80 nm). Figures 7B,C illustrate the EL spectra and external quantum efficiency (EQE)-current density characteristics of the IB-TRZ- and TpIBT-tFFO-based OLEDs. A summary of the device performances is provided in Table 5. The EL spectra of the OLEDs were substantially identical to the corresponding PL spectra, with λ_MAX at 450 and 472 nm for IB-TRZ and TpIBT-tFFO, respectively. The TpIBT-tFFO-based OLED exhibited maximum EQE (EQE_MAX) of 12.2%, which is approximately seven times higher than that of the IB-TRZ-based OLED (EQE_MAX = 1.8%). This remarkable improvement of EQE can be attributed to the efficient TADF of TpIBT-tFFO.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. (A) Device structures of the TpIBT-tFFO- and IB-TRZ-based OLEDs and the utilized materials. The HOMO/LUMO energy levels of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ are depicted in red and blue lines, respectively. (B) EL spectra of TpIBT-tFFO- and IB-TRZ-based OLEDs. (C) EQEs of TpIBT-tFFO- and IB-TRZ-based OLEDs as a function of current density.

TABLE 5

Table 5. OLED performances of TpIBT-tFFO and IB-TRZ.

Conclusion

In summary, in the present study, we developed a tFFO-based TADF material, i.e., TpIBT-tFFO, and compared it with IB-TRZ. Both materials contain an iminodibenzyl moiety as an electron donor unit. The TD-DFT calculations demonstrated that not only T₁ but also T₂ were lying close to the S₁ state in TpIBT-tFFO, as we designed for. From photophysical properties, IB-TRZ had two different conformers, resulting in dual emission. In contrast, the conformation was effectively controlled in the tFFO system, providing a single-peaked emission in TpIBT-tFFO. Furthermore, TpIBT-tFFO exhibited higher PLQY and higher EQE values compared to IB-TRZ. The k_RISC of TpIBT-tFFO was determined to be 6.9 × 10⁶ s⁻¹, which is one of the highest values in TADF materials composed of only H, C, and N atoms, as a consequence of the tFFO strategy.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

HK proposed the idea of tFFO and KS, YW, and YK proposed the idea of IBT-based TADF. YW and YK performed quantum chemical calculations and carried out characterization. HN, YW, and YK contributed to the synthesis of the materials. YK fabricated the devices under the supervision of YW. All authors participated in writing the manuscript. YW and HK planned and supervised this study. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant nos. 17H01231 and 17J09631. Computation time was provided by the Super Computer System, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University. NMR measurements were supported by the Joint Usage/Research Centre (JURC) at the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Japan.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2020.00530/full#supplementary-material

References

Akinaga, Y., and Ten-no, S. (2008). Range-separation by the Yukawa potential in long-range corrected density functional theory with Gaussian-type basis functions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 462, 348–351. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.07.103

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Braveenth, R., Lee, H., Kim, S., Raagulan, K., Kim, S., Kwon, J. H., et al. (2019). High efficiency green TADF emitters of acridine donor and triazine acceptor D-A-D structures. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 7672–7680. doi: 10.1039/C9TC02491C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di, D., Romanov, A. S., Yang, L., Richter, J. M., Rivett, J. P. H., Jones, S., et al. (2017). High-performance light-emitting diodes based on carbene-metal-amides. Science 356, 159–163. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4345

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dias, F. B., Santos, J., Graves, D. R., Data, P., Nobuyasu, R. S., Fox, M. A., et al. (2016). The role of local triplet excited states and D-A relative orientation in thermally activated delayed fluorescence: photophysics and devices. Adv. Sci. 3, 1600080. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Endo, A., Sato, K., Yoshimura, K., Kai, T., Kawada, A., Miyazaki, H., et al. (2011). Efficient up-conversion of triplet excitons into a singlet state and its application for organic light emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 083302. doi: 10.1063/1.3558906

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Etherington, M. K., Gibson, J., Higginbotham, H. F., Penfold, T. J., and Monkman, A. P. (2016). Revealing the spin-vibronic coupling mechanism of thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Nat. Commun. 7, 13680. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gibson, J., Monkman, A. P., and Penfold, T. J. (2016). The importance of vibronic coupling for efficient reverse intersystem crossing in thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules. Chem. Phys. Chem. 17, 2956–2961. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201600662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hosokai, T., Matsuzaki, H., Nakanotani, H., Tokumaru, K., Tsutsui, T., Furube, A., et al. (2017). Evidence and mechanism of efficient thermally activated delayed fluorescence promoted by delocalized excited states. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603282. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1603282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, W., Einzinger, M., Maurano, A., Zhu, T., Tiepelt, J., Yu, C., et al. (2019). Large increase in external quantum efficiency by dihedral angle tuning in a sky-blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitter. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1900476. doi: 10.1002/adom.201900476

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaji, H., Suzuki, H., Fukushima, T., Shizu, K., Suzuki, K., Kubo, S., et al. (2015). Purely organic electroluminescent material realizing 100% conversion from electricity to light. Nat. Commun. 6, 8476. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H. S., Park, H., Park, S. R., Lee, S. H., Ahn, Y., Lee, Y. S., et al. (2018). Photophysical properties of thermally activated delayed fluorescent materials upon distortion of central axis of donor moiety. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 28576–28587. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11144

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kukhta, N. A., Batsanov, A. S., Bryce, M. R., and Monkman, A. P. (2018). Importance of chromophore rigidity on the efficiency of blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 28564–28575. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10867

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, T. A., Chatterjee, T., Tsai, W. L., Lee, W. K., Wu, M. J., Jiao, M., et al. (2016). Sky-blue organic light emitting diode with 37% external quantum efficiency using thermally activated delayed fluorescence from spiroacridine-triazine hybrid. Adv. Mater. 28, 6976–6983. doi: 10.1002/adma.201601675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lyskov, I., and Marian, C. M. (2017). Climbing up the ladder: intermediate triplet states promote the reverse intersystem crossing in the efficient TADF emitter ACRSA. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 21145–21153. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06187

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marian, C. M. (2016). Mechanism of the triplet-to-singlet upconversion in the assistant dopant ACRXTN. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 3715–3721. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00060

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noda, H., Nakanotani, H., and Adachi, C. (2018). Excited state engineering for efficient reverse intersystem crossing. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao6910. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Samanta, P. K., Kim, D., Coropceanu, V., and Brédas, J. L. (2017). Up-conversion intersystem crossing rates in organic emitters for thermally activated delayed fluorescence: impact of the nature of singlet vs triplet excited states. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4042–4051. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b12124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, H., Zhong, C., and Brédas, J. L. (2015). Reliable prediction with tuned range-separated functionals of the singlet-triplet gap in organic emitters for thermally activated delayed fluorescence. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3851–3858. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uoyama, H., Goushi, K., Shizu, K., Nomura, H., and Adachi, C. (2012). Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes from delayed fluorescence. Nature 492, 234–238. doi: 10.1038/nature11687

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wada, Y., Nakagawa, H., Matsumoto, S., Wakisaka, Y., and Kaji, H. (2020). Organic light emitters exhibiting very fast reverse intersystem crossing. Nat. Photon. doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0667-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Z., Mao, Z., Xie, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Zhao, J., et al. (2017). Recent advances in organic thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 915–1016. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00368K

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar