Supported Pt Nanoparticles on Mesoporous Titania for Selective Hydrogenation of Phenylacetylene

Introduction

Selective hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes is one of the most industrially important reactions (Yang et al., 1998, 2019; Mastalir et al., 2000; Huang et al., 2007; Studt et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2009; Liu H. et al., 2012; Sheng et al., 2012; Tüysüz et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2015, 2019; Xie et al., 2016; Xiao et al., 2017; Zhan et al., 2017). The increase of alkene selectivity not only benefits high quality of the downstream polyene products but greatly improves the alkene yields and profitability (Borodziński and Bond, 2006, 2008; McCue and Anderson, 2015; Hu et al., 2018a). Pt-based catalysts still suffer from low selectivity to alkenes especially in higher alkyne conversion windows, despite its high activity for hydrogenation (Li et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018). In theory, the adsorption and activation of alkynes are favored thermodynamically over Pt compared to alkenes. However, as alkynes approach a high conversion, alkenes become kinetically favorable to adsorb on Pt, leading to a full hydrogenation to alkanes and thus a sharp decrease in alkene selectivity (Yang et al., 2012; McCue and Anderson, 2015). For example, commercial Pd/C or Pt/C catalysts generally produce alkane at 100% alkyne conversion (Li et al., 2012). The lack of control of alkene selectivity at higher alkyne conversions greatly limits alkene yields. As a result, selective hydrogenation of alkynes is generally conducted at low alkyne conversions to generate enhanced yields of alkenes.

The key to solving this problem lies in developing more efficient Pt-group metal catalysts with weakened alkene adsorption strength, which facilitates the alkenes desorption rather than over hydrogenation to alkanes. Compared with strong σ-bonded alkenes, π-bonded alkenes are more favorable to desorb from the active Pt-group metal (Wan and Zhao, 2007; Armbrüster et al., 2010; Mitsudome et al., 2016; Feng et al., 2017). For example, Li et al. found that the π-bonded ethylene was 0.75 eV more facile than the σ-bonded ethylene to desorb from Pd surfaces based on density-functional theory (DFT) calculations (Feng et al., 2017). This in turn greatly favors high ethylene selectivity where 80% ethylene selectivity is achieved, even when acetylene is fully converted. The π-mode alkene adsorption is mainly on atop metal sites (Pei et al., 2017). To improve the alkene selectivity in selective hydrogenation of alkyne, both nanoparticles (NPs) downsizing and alloying strategies have been carried out to enrich the atop sites of Pt-group metal catalysts (Hu et al., 2018b). On the other hand, metal-support interaction has long been employed to tune catalytic properties of catalysts especially the small NPs with strong interactions with supports (Teschner et al., 2008). A reduced hydrogen reduction temperature is generally observed on the small NPs functionalized supports, which greatly benefits hydrogenation activity by virtue of strong hydrogen spillover (Wang et al., 2015; Wei et al., 2018). The decrease of particle sizes also enables more surface-exposed and low-coordinated active sites in the form of corner or edge sites, potentially favoring weak π-adsorbed alkenes (Kleis et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2019). Thus, smaller Pt NPs hold great potential to catalyze semi-hydrogenation of alkynes with high catalytic activity and alkene selectivity.

In the current study, we present a highly selective catalyst that contains ultrasmall Pt NPs (2.5 nm), strong Pt-support (Pt-TiO₂) interaction, and high surface area (mesoporous framework) for selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene to styrene. Supporting ultrasmall Pt NPs on mesoporous TiO₂ (Pt@mTiO₂) were prepared using an evaporation-induced self-assembly (EISA) method (Figure 1a). For this synthesis, platinum acetylacetonate (Pt(acac)₂) was mixed with titanium sources and structure-directing polymers in EISA (Liu X. et al., 2012). Upon annealing, ultrasmall Pt NPs were synthesized and encapsulated within the ordered mTiO₂ support. The ordered mesopores of mTiO₂ provide a powerful nanoconfinement and endow the ultrasmall Pt nanoparticles with excellent size uniformity and thermal stability. The monodisperse Pt NPs with sizes of around 2.5 nm remained stable after calcination at 450°C. Pt NPs supported on mTiO₂ (Pt@TiO₂) exhibited excellent catalytic properties toward selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene. The selectivity to styrene remained at 100% in the phenylacetylene conversion range of 20–75%. Even at 100% phenylacetylene conversion, Pt@TiO₂ exhibited >80% styrene selectivity. The abundant surface atop Pt sites of the Pt@mTiO₂ accounted for the high styrene selectivity as revealed by CO-DRIFTS. In addition, the specific mass activity of the 2.5 nm Pt@mTiO₂ reached as high as 0.5 mol h⁻¹ per gram of Pt metal, which is 2.5 times higher than that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst (0.2 mol h⁻¹ per gram of Pt metal).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of preparing 2.5 nm Pt NPs supported within the mesoporous TiO₂. (b,c) SEM images, (d,e) HAADF-STEM images, and (f) EDS mapping images of Pt@mTiO₂. The inset of (b,d,e) are size/diameter distributions of mesopores from SEM, mesopores from TEM, and Pt NPs from STEM.

Experimental Section

Chemicals and Materials

Titanium chloride (TiCl₄), titanium tetraisopropoxide (TIPO), 1,4-dioxane, phenylacetylene, commercial Pt/C (5 wt%) and platinum acetylacetonate (Pt(acac)₂) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The CDCl₃ was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. All the chemicals were used without further purification unless otherwise noted. Silane-containing block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate) (PEO-b-PTMSPMA, M_n = 56.9 kg mol⁻¹) was prepared through atom transfer radical polymerization (ATPR) method as described in our previous reports (Tauster et al., 1978; Wang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2020). The polymer micelles were prepared in water/ethanol mixtures and dialyzed in ethanol prior to use. Deionized water (High-Q, Inc. 103S Stills) with a resistivity of >10.0 MΩ was used in all experiments.

Synthesis of Pt@mTiO₂

Pt@mTiO₂ was prepared using an EISA method. In a typical synthesis, 400 μL of newly prepared TiCl₄ solution (10 % in ethanol, volume ratio) was added to 5.0 mL of PEO-b-PTMSPMA micelles solution (15.0 mg mL⁻¹ in ethanol) under stirring. Two hundred and seventy micro liter of TIPO was then added into the above solution, followed by mild stirring for 30 min. 2.0 mg of Pt(acac)₂ dissolved in 1.0 mL of ethanol was added dropwise where the theoretical mole ratio of Pt to Ti is 0.004 (corresponding to 1.0 wt% Pt loading in the obtained Pt@mTiO₂). After sufficient stirring for 30 min, the mixture solution was transferred into a Petri dish to evaporate the solvent at 40°C for 24 h and 100°C for another 12 h. After this procedure, the obtained intermediates were allowed for calcination at 450°C under air for 2 h. A template removal process is further carried out by washing with hot 2.0 M NaOH solution for 30 min at 50°C. The Pt loading given by EDS measurements is 1 wt%, agreeing well with the initial Pt feed ratio. Through subsequent drying in vacuum at 50°C overnight, Pt@mTiO₂ was finally obtained. About 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mesoporous TiO₂ is also prepared as a control using similar procedures except that the thermal calcination is carried out at 650°C for 2 h.

Selective Hydrogenation of Phenylacetylene Catalytic Evaluations

Selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene over the Pt@mTiO₂ catalysts was carried out by the following procedures. Firstly, 10.0 mg of catalyst was added to 3.0 mL of 1,4-dioxane in a 15 mL processed glass bottle. After 20 min sonication, 100.0 mg (1.0 mmol) of phenylacetylene was further added to the homogeneous suspension and stirred for another 30 min. Before transferring the processed bottle to a 25 mL high-pressure stainless-steel reactor, the magnet is taken out, leaving the reaction happen at static conditions without stirring. After purging with hydrogen several times, the reactor was pressurized with 50 psi (pounds per square inch) hydrogen and reacted for varied times. After the reaction finished, the whole reactor was cooled down in an ice bath. The postreaction suspension was separated by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm. The resultant product was kept in a 5 mL test tube and the proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H NMR) analysis was carried out using CDCl₃ as solvent to calculate the conversion of phenylacetylene and the selectivity to styrene. The reaction kinetics were measured both for the Pt@mTiO₂ and commercial Pt/C catalysts. The specific reaction rate was determined as the consumption rate of the phenylacetylene (normalized to the mass of Pt metal per hour) by controlling the phenylacetylene conversion in the kinetic region. The specific rate in this work was calculated using the following equation:

$\begin{array}{ll}r=\frac{N}{w*t}& (1)\end{array}$

where r is the specific rate, N is the converted phenylacetylene amount in mole, w is supported metal loading weight (gram), and t is the reaction (minute).

The turnover frequency (TOF) is calculated based on the following equation:

$\begin{array}{ll}TOF=\frac{N}{(w/M)*D*t}& (2)\end{array}$

where N is the converted phenylacetylene amount in mole, w is supported Pt loading weight (gram), M is the molar mass of Pt, D is metal dispersion of Pt and t is the reaction (second). The metal dispersion is calculated according to previous reports (Dominguez-Dominguez et al., 2008; Qiao et al., 2011).

The stability tests of the Pt@mTiO₂ and the commercial Pt/C were carried out by recycling the catalyst for 5 consecutive cycles.

Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted on a FEI Nova NanoSEM 450. Bright and dark-field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on JEM-2100F FETEM. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected on a Bruker D2 Phaser. The small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) patterns were recorded on a Bruker Nano STAR instrument. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was conducted on ESCALAB 250 Xi X-ray photoelectron spectrometer with Al Kα radiation. The N₂ sorption measurements were conducted on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 Surface Area and Porosity Analyzer. ¹H NMR spectroscopy was collected on a Bruker Avance 300 MHz spectrometer. Diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared (DRIFT) spectroscopy was carried out using a Nicolet IS50 spectrometer using CO as a probe molecule. The DRIFT cell was filled with 20 mg of catalysts and was treated at 100°C with nitrogen before CO was introduced.

Results and Discussion

Mesoscopic and microscopic structures of the Pt@mTiO₂ were thoroughly characterized with SEM and high-angle annular dark field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) (Figure 1). The SEM image in Figure 1b shows the mesopores throughout entire mTiO₂ support. Supplementary Figure 1 shows that mTiO₂ displays bulk cubic morphology with a broad side length distribution. The zoomed-in SEM picture in Figure 1c confirms the uniform distribution of mesopores. The average pore size of mTiO₂ is 11.7 ± 2.2 nm as given in the inset of Figure 1b. Since Pt NPs are small, there is no obvious contrast on bright field TEM. The HAADF-STEM technique is further used to identify the ultrasmall Pt NPs. The HAADF-STEM images of Pt@mTiO₂ in Figures 1d–f reveal the well-dispersed Pt NPs. Pt NPs with a higher electron density are brighter under dark-field STEM image while TiO₂ is darker. The average size of Pt NPs is 2.5 ± 0.5 nm as plotted in Figure 1e. The pore size of mTiO₂ is about 11 nm from HAADF-STEM characterization, which agrees well with the above SEM observations. Figure 1f shows energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping images of Pt@mTiO₂, further confirming fine dispersion of these 2.5 nm Pt NPs in mTiO₂ support. The Pt loading of Pt@mTiO₂ is further determined by EDS measurements. As show in Supplementary Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 1, the Pt loadings obtained by EDS measurements of Pt@mTiO₂ are about 1 wt%, agreeing well with the initial feed ratio (1 wt%). This observation implies no loss of Pt during preparation processes. By comparison, we have also carried out TEM observations of the commercial Pt/C catalyst. As displayed in Supplementary Figure 3, the Pt NPs in commercial Pt/C show a very wide size distribution averaging about 3 nm as reported previously (Cui et al., 2019). The Pt loading of the commercial Pt/C is 5 wt% as received.

To examine the mesoporous structures and crystallographic information of the Pt@mTiO₂, we carried out small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization. Figure 2A is the SAXS patterns of the Pt@mTiO₂ and the pure mTiO₂ support. These data show a set of strong scattering peaks that are clearly identified and assigned to (111), (311), and (500) reflections of the face-centered cubic (fcc) mesostructure. The average cell parameters were calculated to be 38 nm as displayed in Supplementary Table 2. The SAXS signals are almost the same for Pt@mTiO₂ and mTiO₂, indicating well-defined mesoporous structures. Figure 2B displayed the wide-angle XRD patterns, suggesting the anatase TiO₂ phase for both Pt@mTiO₂ and mTiO₂ (JCPDS 00-064-0863). Unfortunately, due to the ultrasmall size, metallic Pt NPs (JCPDS 04-0802) only showed very broad and weak XRD diffraction (Xiang et al., 2011; Prinz et al., 2014). Benefiting from the well-defined mesoporous structures, the BET specific surface area of the Pt@TiO₂ is 42 m²g⁻¹ with an average of pore size of 14 nm as displayed in Figures 2C,D.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. (A) SAXS, and (B) wide-angle XRD of Pt@mTiO₂ and pure mTiO₂. (C) N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms, and (D) pore size distributions of Pt@mTiO₂.

Pt@mTiO₂ has multiple advantageous properties, including ultrasmall Pt NPs and mesoporous framework with high surface area, which possibly benefit the selective hydrogenation of alkynes to alkenes. In this manuscript, selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene was chosen as a probe reaction since the semi-hydrogenation product of styrene is industrially important (Figure 3A). As a control, commercial Pt/C was also investigated. Pt@mTiO₂ was favorable for catalyzing the hydrogenation of phenylacetylene to styrene, while commercial Pt/C fully hydrogenated phenylacetylene to ethylbenzene. Figure 3B showed the phenylacetylene conversion and the styrene selectivity over Pt@mTiO₂ as a function of reaction time. Phenylacetylene was selectively converted to styrene in a wide phenylacetylene conversion window (20–75%), only when phenylacetylene reached full conversion, styrene selectivity slightly dropped to 80.3%. This result (80.3% styrene selectivity at 100% phenylacetylene conversion) is among the best reported to date as demonstrated in Supplementary Table 3 (Zhao et al., 1998; Kleis et al., 2011; Behrens et al., 2012; Montesano Lopez, 2014; Alig et al., 2019; Han et al., 2019). By comparison, pure mTiO₂ is inactive and shows no activity to convert phenylacetylene in the reaction time range from 7 to 26 h (Supplementary Figure 4). We have also compared the catalytic properties of Pt@mTiO₂ with commercial Pt/C catalysts. Phenylacetylene was fully over hydrogenated to ethylbenzene in the measuring time range from 7 to 26 h with a 100% ethylbenzene selectivity as shown in Supplementary Figure 5.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. (A) Hydrogenation of phenylacetylene over Pt@mTiO₂ and commercial Pt/C. (B) Phenylacetylene conversion and styrene selectivity of Pt@mTiO₂ as a function of reaction time. The bottom line shows that the mTiO₂ is inert for converting phenylacetylene. (C) Specific mass activity of the Pt@mTiO₂ and the commercial Pt/C catalyst. (D) Catalytic stability measurements of the Pt@mTiO₂ by recovering the catalysts for five consecutive cycles. Reaction conditions: 10 mg of catalyst is dispersed in 3 mL of 1,4-dioxane that contains 0.1 g of phenylacetylene at 50°C and 50 psi of hydrogen for different reaction times.

Figure 3C shows the catalytic rates of Pt@mTiO₂ and commercial Pt/C normalized to the Pt mass per unit time. By controlling the phenylacetylene conversion in the kinetic region (10–20% of conversion), the rate characterizes the intrinsic activity of the catalyst. The catalytic rate of Pt@mTiO₂ is 0.5 mol g_Pt⁻¹ h⁻¹, 2.5 times higher than that of commercial Pt/C (0.2 mol g_Pt⁻¹ h⁻¹). In addition, the TOF value of the Pt@mTiO₂ is calculated to be 4.1 s⁻¹, which is more than 2 times that of the commercial Pt/C (2.0 s⁻¹), demonstrating a higher intrinsic activity. According to previous results, the particle size of Pt NPs is intimately connected with the amount of surface-exposed active sites, which in turn affects the activity (Zhang et al., 2007; Qiao et al., 2011). The smaller sized Pt in Pt@mTiO₂ results in more exposed surface Pt sites compared with commercial Pt/C (average size of 3 nm), which benefits high catalytic activity. Catalytic stability is another concern for practical applications. To test the catalytic stability of Pt@mTiO₂, we have carried out recycling experiments of the post-reacted Pt@mTiO₂ at 50°C and 50 psi hydrogen. As shown in Figure 3D, styrene selectivity remains around 80% over the Pt@mTiO₂ while phenylacetylene conversion remains at 100% even after five catalytic recycles, showing excellent catalytic stability. By comparison, styrene selectivity over the commercial Pt/C is 0% for the five consecutive measurements at 100% phenylacetylene conversion as displayed in Supplementary Figure 6. By virtue of the nanoconfinment enabled by mesoporous mTiO₂ supports, the average particle size of the post-reacted Pt@mTiO₂ remains the same without any growth or aggregation as displayed in Supplementary Figure 7.

To reveal the intrinsic nature why Pt@mTiO₂ presented excellent catalytic properties for the selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene, the surface properties of Pt were carefully studied. We first carried out X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for Pt@mTiO₂. Figure 4A is the high-resolution Pt 4f XPS spectra of Pt@mTiO₂ and commercial Pt/C. The well-resolved XPS binding energy peaks centered at 71.9 and 75.3 eV of Pt@mTiO₂ are ascribed to metallic Pt 4f_7/2 and Pt 4f_5/2, respectively. For the commercial Pt/C, the Pt 4f_7/2 and Pt 4f_5/2 shifted to a slightly higher binding energy at 72 and 75.4 eV, respectively. The shift of Pt 4f peaks is indicative of the surface electron density difference of the two samples. 2.5 nm Pt NPs is slightly electron-rich compared to that of the commercial Pt/C. The electron-rich 2.5 nm Pt NPs are more effective to transfer electrons to the π^* molecular orbitals of phenylacetylene, which in turn promotes phenylacetylene activation and improves catalytic reactivity (Wan and Zhao, 2007). Both the Pt@mTiO₂ and commercial Pt/C show existence of Pt²⁺ species as identified at around 73.1 and 77.1 eV, respectively, which may derive from surface oxidation (Miller et al., 2014). The Pt²⁺/Pt⁰ ratio, as measured from the integration areas in the fitting cure, is 0.43 for 2.5 nm Pt NPs. By comparison, this is much lower for commercial Pt/C with a Pt²⁺/Pt⁰ ratio of 0.35. This result implies that Pt is more surface oxidized in 2.5 nm Pt NPs, which is further evidenced in Ti 2p XPS spectra. As shown in Figure 4B, a strong Ti³⁺ XPS binding energy peak at around 458.2 eV is found in 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂, which is absent in the pure mTiO₂ (Yang et al., 2017; Ou et al., 2018). These results show that 2.5 nm Pt NPs have a stronger interaction with the mTiO₂ support where Pt NPs are partially oxidized and demonstrate electron back-donation to reduce Ti⁴⁺ to Ti³⁺ of mTiO₂. The stronger metal-support interaction is of great importance in stabilizing small NPs as revealed by a series of reports (Lu and Schüth, 2006). In the current case, the excellent thermal stability of 2.5 nm Pt NPs supported on mTiO₂ may also derive from strong metal-support interactions.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. (A) High-resolution Pt 4f XPS spectra of the 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ and commercial Pt/C. (B) High-resolution Ti 2p XPS spectra of the 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂, and pure mTiO₂.

Small NPs afford abundant surface low-coordinated corner or edge sites, which potentially modifies reactant/product adsorption modes that are quite different from that on larger ones (Zelcer and Soler-Illia, 2013). For example, alkenes prefer a weak π adsorption on low-coordinated Pt sites such as corner, edge, or single atom sites of small Pt NPs rather than a strong σ adsorption on continuous Pt lattices of larger Pt NPs. The weakening of alkene adsorption strength greatly favors high alkene selectivity (Yang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2019). To this end, CO-DRIFTS was further carried out to understand the high selectivity to styrene on Pt@mTiO₂. For the commercial Pt/C, it is very difficult to collect CO-DRIFT spectra because of signal blocking of carbon supports. Thus, we further prepared 3.6 nm Pt supported on mTiO₂ by calcination at a higher annealing temperature (650°C), which preserved the mesoporous structure but with slightly larger Pt NPs (3.6 nm) (Supplementary Figure 8). Supplementary Figure 9 shows that both the catalytic activity and styrene selectivity of the 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ are much lower than that of the 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂. Figure 5 shows the CO-DRIFTS curve of 2.5 nm Pt NPs and 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂, respectively. The CO adsorption models on 2.5 nm Pt NPs are quite different from that on 3.6 nm Pt NPs. The fitted results show that only the linear CO adsorption mode is observed on the 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ while the 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ display both linear CO adsorption and bridged CO adsorption modes in the wavenumber window between 1,800 and 2,200 cm⁻¹ (Singh et al., 2018). The linear CO adsorption of both 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ and 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ are related to the surface atop Pt sites (Wieckowski, 1999). Due to the Pt coordination differences, the linear CO adsorption bands of the 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ and the 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ are divided into two regions that are referred to as the low-coordination Pt-CO linear adsorption band and high-coordination Pt-CO linear adsorption band centered at around 2,004 and 2,160 cm⁻¹, respectively (Redina et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2018). The low-coordination Pt-CO linear adsorption to high-coordination Pt-CO linear adsorption ratio of 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ is calculated to be 4.8, which is 6 times higher than that of 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂. This result demonstrates high unsaturated coordination of the Pt sites in 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ due to the smaller Pt NPs size as compared with 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂, which agrees well with the above HAADF-STEM observations. The schematic models of Pt NPs with diameters of 2.5 and 3.6 nm are also constructed, respectively, as displayed in Supplementary Figure 10. Smaller Pt NPs show more abundant surface corner and edge sites, which accounts for the pure linear CO adsorption revealed via CO-DRIFTS measurements. The unique surface structures of the 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ greatly benefit weak styrene adsorption in selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene through a π adsorption mode, which favors styrene desorption and high styrene selectivity.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy with CO molecules of the 2.5 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂ and the 3.6 nm Pt NPs on mTiO₂.

Conclusion

To summarize, we report the preparation of mesoporous TiO₂ confined ultrasmall Pt nanoparticles with an average particle size of 2.5 ± 0.5 nm using an EISA method. As-resulted Pt@mTiO₂ displayed excellent catalytic activity and styrene selectivity in semi-hydrogenation of phenylacetylene. The hydrogenation activity of Pt@mTiO₂ displays a 2.5-fold increase over that of the commercial Pt/C. A 100% styrene selectivity is also obtained over the Pt@mTiO₂ in a wide phenylacetylene conversion range of 20–75%. The styrene selectivity is remarkably above 80% even at full phenylacetylene conversion. The excellent styrene selectivity is ascribed to the abundant surface atop Pt sites as given by the CO-DRIFTS. In addition, the Pt@mTiO₂ also shows excellent catalytic stability as demonstrated in five consecutive recycling experiments, which shows great potential for practical applications. Our work is expected to open up new opportunities for developing highly efficient alkene-to-alkene conversion catalysts by novel synthesis.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

MH, SS, JH, and BL conceived the projects. MH carried out the experiments and analyzed data in the assist of LJ. YD did high-resolution TEM and analyzed the data. All authors co-wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

JH is grateful for the financial support from the University of Connecticut. The SEM/TEM studies were performed using the facilities in the UConn/Thermo Fisher Scientific Center for Advanced Microscopy and Materials Analysis (CAMMA). SS thanks the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical, Biological and Geological Sciences under grant DE-FG02-86ER13622 for support of this research.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2020.581512/full#supplementary-material

References

Alig, L., Fritz, M., and Schneider, S. (2019). First-row transition metal (De)hydrogenation catalysis based on functional pincer ligands. Chem. Rev. 119, 2681–2751. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00555

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Armbrüster, M., Kovnir, K., Behrens, M., Teschner, D., Grin, Y., and Schlögl, R. (2010). Pd–Ga intermetallic compounds as highly selective semihydrogenation catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 14745–14747. doi: 10.1021/ja106568t

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Behrens, M., Studt, F., Kasatkin, I., Kühl, S., Hävecker, M., Abild-Pedersen, F., et al. (2012). The active site of methanol synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ industrial catalysts. Science 336, 893–897. doi: 10.1126/science.1219831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borodziński, A., and Bond, G. C. (2006). Selective hydrogenation of ethyne in ethene-rich streams on palladium catalysts. Part 1. effect of changes to the catalyst during reaction. Catal. Rev. 48, 91–144. doi: 10.1080/01614940500364909

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borodziński, A., and Bond, G. C. (2008). Selective hydrogenation of ethyne in ethene-rich streams on palladium catalysts, Part 2: steady-state kinetics and effects of palladium particle size, carbon monoxide, and promoters. Catal. Rev. 50, 379–469. doi: 10.1080/01614940802142102

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, Y., Lian, X., Xu, L., Chen, M., Yang, B., Wu, C.-e., et al. (2019). Designing and fabricating ordered mesoporous metal oxides for CO₂ catalytic conversion: a review and prospect. Materials 12:276. doi: 10.3390/ma12020276

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dominguez-Dominguez, S., Berenguer-Murcia, A., Pradhan, B. K., Linares-Solano, A., and Cazorla-Amoros, D. (2008). Semihydrogenation of phenylacetylene catalyzed by palladium nanoparticles supported on carbon materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 3827–3834. doi: 10.1021/jp710693u

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, Q., Zhao, S., Wang, Y., Dong, J., Chen, W., He, D., et al. (2017). Isolated single-atom pd sites in intermetallic nanostructures: high catalytic selectivity for semihydrogenation of alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 7294–7301. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01471

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, A., Zhang, J., Sun, W., Chen, W., Zhang, S., Han, Y., et al. (2019). Isolating contiguous Pt atoms and forming Pt-Zn intermetallic nanoparticles to regulate selectivity in 4-nitrophenylacetylene hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 10:3787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11794-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, M., Jin, L., Su, X., Bamonte, S., Lu, X., Gao, P., et al. (2020). Polymer-assisted co-assembly towards synthesis of mesoporous titania encapsulated monodisperse PdAu for highly selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene. ChemCatChem 12, 1476–1482. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201901957

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, M., Zhang, J., Zhu, W., Chen, Z., Gao, X., Du, X., et al. (2018a). 50 ppm of Pd dispersed on Ni(OH)2 nanosheets catalyzing semi-hydrogenation of acetylene with high activity and selectivity. Nano Res. 11, 905–912. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1701-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, M., Zhao, S., Liu, S., Chen, C., Chen, W., Zhu, W., et al. (2018b). MOF-confined Sub-2 nm atomically ordered intermetallic PdZn nanoparticles as high-performance catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Adv. Mater. 30:1801878. doi: 10.1002/adma.201801878

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, W., McCormick, J. R., Lobo, R. F., and Chen, J. G. (2007). Selective hydrogenation of acetylene in the presence of ethylene on zeolite-supported bimetallic catalysts. J. Catal. 246, 40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.11.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kleis, J., Greeley, J., Romero, N., Morozov, V., Falsig, H., Larsen, A. H., et al. (2011). Finite size effects in chemical bonding: from small clusters to solids. Catal. Lett. 141, 1067–1071. doi: 10.1007/s10562-011-0632-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C., Shao, Z., Pang, M., Williams, C. T., and Liang, C. (2012). Carbon nanotubes supported Pt catalysts for phenylacetylene hydrogenation: effects of oxygen containing surface groups on Pt dispersion and catalytic performance. Catal. Today. 186, 69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.09.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, K., Zhao, Y., Song, C., and Guo, X. (2017). Magnetic ordered mesoporous Fe₃O₄/CeO₂ composites with synergy of adsorption and fenton catalysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 425, 526–534. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H., Du, X., Xing, X., Wang, G., and Qiao, S. Z. (2012). Highly ordered mesoporous Cr₂O₃ materials with enhanced performance for gas sensors and lithium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 48, 865–867. doi: 10.1039/C1CC16341H

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Mou, C.-Y., Lee, S., Li, Y., Secrest, J., and Jang, B. W.-L. (2012). Room temperature O₂ plasma treatment of SiO₂ supported Au catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene in the presence of large excess of ethylene. J. Catal. 285, 152–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2011.09.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, A.-H., and Schüth, F. (2006). Nanocasting: a versatile strategy for creating nanostructured porous materials. Adv. Mater. 18, 1793–1805. doi: 10.1002/adma.200600148

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mastalir, A., Király, Z., Szöllosi, G., and Bartok, M. (2000). Preparation of organophilic Pd–montmorillonite, an efficient catalyst in alkyne semihydrogenation. J. Catal. 194, 146–152. doi: 10.1006/jcat.2000.2929

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCue, A. J., and Anderson, J. A. (2015). Recent advances in selective acetylene hydrogenation using palladium containing catalysts. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 9, 142–153. doi: 10.1007/s11705-015-1516-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miller, D., Sanchez Casalongue, H., Bluhm, H., Ogasawara, H., Nilsson, A., and Kaya, S. (2014). Different reactivity of the various platinum oxides and chemisorbed oxygen in CO oxidation on Pt(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6340–6347. doi: 10.1021/ja413125q

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mitsudome, T., Urayama, T., Yamazaki, K., Maehara, Y., Yamasaki, J., Gohara, K., et al. (2016). Design of core-Pd/shell-Ag nanocomposite catalyst for selective semihydrogenation of alkynes. ACS Catal. 6, 666–670. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02518

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Montesano Lopez, R. (2014). Selectivity and Deactivation in the Single-stage Synthesis of Dimethyl Ether from CO₂/CO/H₂. Imperial College London. doi: 10.25560/26597

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ou, G., Xu, Y., Wen, B., Lin, R., Ge, B., Tang, Y., et al. (2018). Tuning defects in oxides at room temperature by lithium reduction. Nat. Commun. 9:1302. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03765-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pei, G. X., Liu, X. Y., Yang, X., Zhang, L., Wang, A., Li, L., et al. (2017). Performance of Cu-alloyed pd single-atom catalyst for semihydrogenation of acetylene under simulated front-end conditions. ACS Catal. 7, 1491–1500. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03293

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prinz, J., Pignedoli, C. A., Stöckl, Q. S., ArmbrÃster, M., Brune, H., Gröning, O., et al. (2014). Adsorption of small hydrocarbons on the three-fold PdGa surfaces: the road to selective hydrogenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 11792–11798. doi: 10.1021/ja505936b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiao, B., Wang, A., Yang, X., Allard, L. F., and Zhang, T. (2011). Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt₁/FeO_x. Nat. Chem. 3, 634–641. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1095

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Redina, E., Greish, A., Novikov, R., Strelkova, A., Kirichenko, O., Tkachenko, O., et al. (2015). Au/Pt/TiO₂ catalysts prepared by redox method for the chemoselective 1,2-propanediol oxidation to lactic acid and an NMR spectroscopy approach for analyzing the product mixture. Appl. Catal. A 491, 170–183. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.11.039

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheng, B., Hu, L., Yu, T., Cao, X., and Gu, H. (2012). Highly-dispersed ultrafine Pt nanoparticles on graphene as effective hydrogenation catalysts. RSC Adv. 2, 5520–5523. doi: 10.1039/c2ra20400b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, J. A., Yang, N., Liu, X., Tsai, C., Stone, K. H., Johnson, B., et al. (2018). Understanding the active sites of CO hydrogenation on Pt–Co catalysts prepared using atomic layer deposition. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 2184–2194. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10541

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Studt, F., Abild-Pedersen, F., Bligaard, T., Sørensen, R. Z., Christensen, C. H., and Nørskov, J. K. (2008). Identification of non-precious metal alloy catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Science 320, 1320–1322. doi: 10.1126/science.1156660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, Q., Angelomé, P. C., Soler-Illia, G. J., and Müller, M. (2017). Formation of ordered mesostructured TiO₂ thin films: a soft coarse-grained simulation study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 28249–28262. doi: 10.1039/C7CP05304E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C., and Garten, R. L. (1978). Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 170–175. doi: 10.1021/ja00469a029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teschner, D., Borsodi, J., Wootsch, A., Révay, Z., Hävecker, M., Knop-Gericke, A., et al. (2008). The roles of subsurface carbon and hydrogen in palladium-catalyzed alkyne hydrogenation. Science 320, 86–89. doi: 10.1126/science.1155200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tüysüz, H., Hwang, Y. J., Khan, S. B., Asiri, A. M., and Yang, P. (2013). Mesoporous CO₃O₄ as an electrocatalyst for water oxidation. Nano Res. 6, 47–54. doi: 10.1007/s12274-012-0280-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, Y., and Zhao, D. (2007). On the controllable soft-templating approach to mesoporous silicates. Chem. Rev. 107, 2821–2860. doi: 10.1021/cr068020s

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Guo, W., Jiang, Z., Yang, R., Jiang, Z., Pan, Y., et al. (2018). New insight into the enhanced activity of ordered mesoporous nickel oxide in formaldehyde catalytic oxidation reactions. J. Catal. 361, 370–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.02.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., Tan, H., Yu, S., and Zhou, K. (2015). Morphological effects of gold clusters on the reactivity of ceria surface oxygen. ACS Catal. 5, 2873–2881. doi: 10.1021/cs502055r

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, X., Shao, B., Zhou, Y., Li, Y., Jin, C., Liu, J., et al. (2018). Geometrical structure of the gold–iron(III) oxide interfacial perimeter for CO oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 57, 11289–11293. doi: 10.1002/anie.201805975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wieckowski, A. (1999). Interfacial Electrochemistry: Theory: Experiment, and Applications. New York, NY: CRC Press.

Google Scholar

Wu, S. M., Yang, X. Y., and Janiak, C. (2019). Confinement effects in zeolite-confined noble metals. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 131, 12468–12482. doi: 10.1002/ange.201900013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiang, S.-C., Zhang, Z., Zhao, C.-G., Hong, K., Zhao, X., Ding, D.-R., et al. (2011). Rationally tuned micropores within enantiopure metal-organic frameworks for highly selective separation of acetylene and ethylene. Nat. Commun. 2:204. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, Y., Zheng, X., Chen, X., Jiang, L., and Zheng, Y. (2017). Synthesis of Mg-doped ordered mesoporous Pd–Al₂O₃ with different basicity for CO, NO, and HC elimination. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 1687–1695. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03799

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, Y., Kocaefe, D., Chen, C., and Kocaefe, Y. (2016). Review of research on template methods in preparation of nanomaterials. J. Nanomater. 2016:2302595. doi: 10.1155/2016/2302595

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, B., Burch, R., Hardacre, C., Headdock, G., and Hu, P. (2012). Origin of the increase of activity and selectivity of nickel doped by Au, Ag, and Cu for acetylene hydrogenation. ACS Catal. 2, 1027–1032. doi: 10.1021/cs2006789

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, J., Zhu, Y., Fan, M., Sun, X., Wang, W. D., and Dong, Z. (2019). Ultrafine palladium nanoparticles confined in core–shell magnetic porous organic polymer nanospheres as highly efficient hydrogenation catalyst. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 554, 157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.07.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, P., Zhao, D., Margolese, D. I., Chmelka, B. F., and Stucky, G. D. (1998). Generalized syntheses of large-pore mesoporous metal oxides with semicrystalline frameworks. Nature 396, 152–155. doi: 10.1038/24132

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X.-F., Wang, A., Qiao, B., Li, J., Liu, J., and Zhang, T. (2013). Single-atom catalysts: a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1740–1748. doi: 10.1021/ar300361m

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Gao, P., Ren, X., Sha, L., Yang, P., Zhang, J., et al. (2017). Massive Ti³⁺ self-doped by the injected electrons from external Pt and the efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible-light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 218, 751–757. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Q., Li, L.-L., Lu, S.-L., Duan, H.-H., Li, Z.-X., Zhu, Y.-X., et al. (2009). Facile synthesis of Zr-based functional materials with highly ordered mesoporous structures. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 4117–4124. doi: 10.1021/jp806467c

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zelcer, A., and Soler-Illia, G. J. A. A. (2013). One-step preparation of UV transparent highly ordered mesoporous zirconia thin films. J. Mater. Chem. C 1, 1359–1367. doi: 10.1039/C2TC00319H

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhan, S., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Shi, Q., Li, Y., and Li, X. (2017). Efficient NH₃-SCR removal of NO_x with highly ordered mesoporous WO₃-CeO₂ at low temperatures. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 203, 199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, G., Yang, D., and Sacher, E. (2007). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analysis of Pt nanoparticles on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, using symmetric component line shapes. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 565–570. doi: 10.1021/jp065606+

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, M., Wang, L., Zhang, C., et al. (2015). Effect of support on the activity of ag-based catalysts for formaldehyde oxidation. Sci. Rep. 5:12950. doi: 10.1038/srep12950

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Jin, L., Liu, B., and He, J. (2019). Templated growth of crystalline mesoporous materials: from soft/hard templates to colloidal templates. Front. Chem. 7:22. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, D., Feng, J., Huo, Q., Melosh, N., Fredrickson, G. H., Chmelka, B. F., et al. (1998). Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 279, 548–552. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Dong, F., Han, W., Zhao, H., and Tang, Z. (2019). The synergistic catalytic effect between graphene oxide and three-dimensional ordered mesoporous CO₃O₄ nanoparticles for low-temperature CO oxidation. Microporous Mesoporous Mat. 273, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.06.042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Tian, H., He, J., and Yang, Q. (2015). Catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde over mesoporous MnO_x-CeO₂ catalysts. Int. J. Nanosci. 14:1460028. doi: 10.1142/S0219581X1460028X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar