ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
A Cooperative Photoactive Class-I Hybrid Polyoxometalate With Benzothiadiazole–Imidazolium Cations
- 1GlaxoSmithKline Carbon Neutral Laboratories for Sustainable Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- 2Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis, Institute of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- 3Department of Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
An organic–inorganic hybrid species based on the Wells–Dawson polyoxotungstate [P2W18O62]6− and novel fluorescent benzothiadiazole–imidazolium cations, [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+, has been synthesized. X-ray crystallographic analysis shows that the inorganic and organic components form a hydrogen-bonded superstructure and that the cations are revealed to be non-equivalent with varying degrees of rotation between the BTD and imidazolium rings due to competition between weak intra- and intermolecular interactions. The UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra indicate that the hybrid has a band gap of 3.13 eV, while the solid-state fluorescence properties of the cation are quenched in the hybrid material, suggesting the existence of electron transfer between the inorganic and organic components. The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies of the polyoxometalate (POM) and BTD-4,7-ImH precursors, estimated through UV–vis absorption spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry, indicate that electron transfer from the BTD cations to the POM may occur in the excited state.
Polyoxometalates (POMs) are discrete anionic metal oxide clusters, commonly formed from Group V and Group VI transition metals in their highest oxidation state. This vast family of compounds is reputed for their rich redox properties (Gumerova and Rompel, 2018) and photoactivity (Cameron et al., 2018) in conjunction with high thermal and oxidative stability (Varga et al., 1998; Lv et al., 2012). As such, POMs have demonstrated applicability in a wide number of research areas including redox and photoredox catalysis (Wang and Yang, 2015), optoelectronics (Chen et al., 2019), soft materials (Kastner et al., 2017), molecular magnetism (Baldoví et al., 2017), photochromic devices (Liu et al., 2006), hybrid nanomaterials (Jordan et al., 2019; Martin et al., 2020), and battery technologies (Huang et al., 2020).
Organic–inorganic hybrid POMs are an emerging family of molecules that involve the inclusion of organic moieties into the inorganic structure of the POM. Organic hybridization offers a near-limitless scope for the enhancement or modulation of the POMs properties through the intelligent design of the organic component. This is typically achieved in one of two ways: either via the exchange of alkali metal or proton countercations with organic countercations (Class I hybrid) or via the covalent grafting of organic fragments onto the POM (Class II hybrid) (Dolbecq et al., 2010; Kibler and Newton, 2018). Class I hybrids remain the most prolifically reported and studied due to their ease of synthesis through simple metathesis reactions and their compatibility with any anionic POM structure. Generally, the physical properties of the POMs are dominated and controlled by the cation, and thus, Class I hybridization is a highly attractive route toward POM-based functional materials such as POM ionic liquids (POM-ILs) (Kibler et al., 2019), POM charge transfer salts (Xu et al., 2010), and POM-decorated polymers (Herrmann et al., 2015).
A lesser explored avenue with Class I hybrids is the photosensitization of POMs using cationic organic or organometallic chromophores. While POMs possesses inherent photoactivity through excitation of the O → M ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) excitation, this is usually limited to the UV region with only marginal tailing into the visible region (Cameron et al., 2018). Cationic chromophores may not only serve to increase the visible light absorption profile of the material through its own excitations but may also allow for intermolecular charge transfer, which can give rise to new optical properties (Chong et al., 2017) or bolster photocatalytic performance (Zhang et al., 2015). Consequently, such materials have shown immense promise as artificial photosynthesis systems for both water oxidation (Bonchio et al., 2019) and carbon dioxide reduction (Ettedgui et al., 2011).
Amongst organic dye molecules, 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles (BTDs) have recently burgeoned as a structural motif in a host of optical applications. Derivatives of BTD have been widely used as components in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) (Fell et al., 2019) and organic solar cells (OSCs) (Yuan et al., 2019) as well as in bioimaging (Neto et al., 2015) and fluorescence sensing (Zhang et al., 2017). Recently, cationic BTD derivatives flanked by imidazolium moieties have shown impressive optical properties and were used as fluorescent lysosome-staining agents (Souza et al., 2020). The use of imidazole flanking groups on the photoactive core allowed for the formation of cationic derivatives without compromising the photoactivity of the system; such a motif would be highly intriguing as components of Class I hybrid POMs to form photoactive materials. Herein, we have synthesized a novel Class I hybrid material based on the combination of a Wells–Dawson phosphotungstate anion and an imidazolium-BTD di-cation [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ and demonstrate the intimate electronic coupling exhibited between the two photoactive components.
Materials and Methods
All reagents and solvents were purchased in high-purity grade from commercial sources and used without further purification. The preparation and characterization of K6P2W18O62 and [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 were conducted according to previous reports (Contant et al., 1990; Souza et al., 2020). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was performed on a Bruker AV400 spectrometer at 298 K. Attenuated total reflectance–Fourier-transform infra-red (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy was recorded on a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer equipped with a Pike GladiATR module. UV–vis spectroscopy was performed on an Agilent Cary 5000 UV–vis NIR Absorption spectrometer using a DRA-900 InGaAs integrating sphere. Fluorescence measurements were recorded on an Edinburgh Instruments FLS980 Photoluminescence spectrometer. Raman spectra were obtained using a HORIBA LabRAM HR Raman microscope, equipped with 532- and 785-nm lasers. CHN Elemental Microanalysis was performed on an Exeter analytical Ce-440 Elemental Analyzer by the UoN School of Chemistry elemental microanalysis services. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were performed on a TGA Discovery Instrument using high-temperature platinum pans and sealed aluminum pans, respectively.
Single crystals were selected and mounted using Fomblin® (YR-1800 perfluoropolyether oil) on a polymer-tipped MiTeGen MicroMountTM and cooled rapidly to 120 K in a stream of cold N2 using an Oxford Cryosystems open-flow cryostat (Cosier and Glazer, 1986). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were collected on an XtaLAB PRO MM007 (PILATUS3 R 200K Hybrid Pixel Array Detector, mirror-monochromated Cu-Kα radiation source; λ = 1.54184 Å, ω scans). Cell parameters were refined from the observed positions of all strong reflections in each data set, and absorption corrections were applied using a Gaussian numerical method with beam profile correction (CrysAlisPro). The structure was solved with Olex2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) by dual-space iterative methods (SHELXT) (Sheldrick, 2015a) and all non-hydrogen atoms refined by full-matrix least-squares on all unique F2 values with anisotropic displacement parameters (SHELXL) (Sheldrick, 2015b). Hydrogen atoms were refined with constrained geometries and riding thermal parameters. Disordered solvent and counterion molecules within voids had their electronic contribution to the structure factor ascertained using the PLATON SQUEEZE procedure (Spek, 2015). The structure was checked with checkCIF. CCDC-2034694 contains the supplementary data for this compound. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Cyclic voltammetry was performed using a CHI600E workstation. A three-electrode setup was employed with a glassy carbon working electrode (d = 3 mm), platinum wire counter electrode, and a Ag wire pseudo reference electrode with the addition of ferrocene as an internal reference. All measurements were performed in anhydrous acetonitrile (10 ml) for solid-state measurements and anhydrous dimethylformamide (DMF) (10 ml) for solution-state measurements with 0.1 M of TBAPF6 as the supporting electrolyte.
The material was analyzed in the solid state by dropcasting the analyte in a carbon matrix onto the glassy carbon working electrode. For K6P2W18O62 and 1, 5 mg of analyte is combined with 5 mg of Vulcan XC72 carbon and to this was added 20 μl of 10 wt% of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) binder in water and 200 μl of ethanol. The slurry is sonicated for 15 min, and then 5.5 μl of the suspension is immediately dropcast onto the center of the 3-mm glassy carbon and allowed to dry for 1 h. For [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2, 0.5 mg of analyte is combined with 5 mg of Vulcan XC72 carbon, and to this is added 10 μl of 10 wt% of PTFE binder in water and 100 μl of ethanol and prepared as above.
Synthesis of 1
[BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 (0.44 g, 1.29 mmol) was dissolved in deionized water (15 ml). This was added dropwise to a stirring solution of K6P2W18O62 (2.09 g, 0.430 mmol) in deionized water (15 ml), which caused the immediate formation of a fine yellow precipitate. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight, and the fine yellow precipitate was collected by Buchner filtration. The precipitate was washed with deionized water and ethyl acetate to yield 1 as a yellow powder (0.737 g, 22%).To prepare single crystals, 60 mg of K6P2W18O62 is dissolved in 5 ml of DMF in a test tube; layered carefully onto this is 12.6 mg of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 in 5 ml of methanol; the tube is carefully sealed and left undisturbed for 1 week, precipitating 1 as yellow needles. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, ppm): δ = 9.15 (CHIm, s, 2H), 8.22 (CHIm-H, s, 4H), 7.57 (CHAr, s, 2H). 31P NMR (DMSO-d6, 202 MHz, ppm): δ = −13.08. ATR-IR (cm−1): 3,133 (CH stretch aliphatic, w), 1,540 (C=N stretch aromatic, w) 1,370 (C=C stretch aromatic, w), 1,085 (P–O stretch, s), 954 (W=Od stretch, s), 901 (W–Ob–W, s), 730 (W–Oc–W). Anal. Calcd. for C36H30N18S3P2W18O62: C, 8.357; H, 0.584; N, 4.873. Found: C, 8.23; H, 0.56; N, 4.47.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization
1 is synthesized via salt metathesis (Figure 1). K6P2W18O62 and [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 are separately dissolved in water in 1:3 molar ratios. The solution of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 is then added dropwise to the solution of K6P2W18O62, causing the immediate precipitation of [P2W18O62][BTD-4,7-ImH]3 (1) as a pale yellow solid. The integrity of the separate ions in 1 was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopies for the BTD-4,7-ImH cations and 31P for the P2W18O62 anions, and the expected stoichiometry and purity of the sample were confirmed with CHN microanalysis.
Initially, the photoabsorption profiles of K6P2W18O62, [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2, and 1 were evaluated with UV–vis absorption spectroscopy (Supplementary Figure 1). We can see that the POM exhibits minimal absorption in the visible region, whereas [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 features a lower-energy absorption feature centered at 373 nm with appreciable tailing into the visible region; the hybrid 1 also exhibits this lower-energy absorption and therefore also absorbs in the high-energy visible region. We additionally screened hybrids of K6P2W18O62 formed with N-methylated and N-acetylated analogs of [BTD-4,7,-ImH]Cl2 for suitability as sensitizers. These were synthesized using the same methodology as above, giving 2 and 3 (see Supplementary Material for synthesis). We evaluated the absorptive properties of 1, 2, and 3 using solution UV–vis spectroscopy (Supplementary Figure 2); interestingly, 2 and 3 do not feature absorption bands that tail into the visible, and 1 has stronger absorptions in the 300- to 330-nm region. This prompted the further study of the structural and electronic properties of 1.
The structure of 1 was further probed by FTIR and Raman spectroscopies. The FTIR spectrum of 1 compared with the starting materials (Supplementary Figure 3) clearly shows characteristic peaks that correspond to the inorganic anion (P–O, W=O, and W–O–W vibrational modes at ~1,085, ~955, and ~730 cm−1, respectively) and the organic cation (C–H stretching modes at >3,000 cm−1, C=C stretch at ~1,540 cm−1, and C=N stretch at ~1,370 cm−1). Similarly, the Raman spectrum of 1 (Supplementary Figure 4) also demonstrates the presence of both inorganic and organic components with prominent peaks from the POM (P–O stretch at ~995 cm−1 and W=O stretch at 975 cm−1) and the organic cation (BTD ring stretch at ~1,565 cm−1 and BTD C–H wag at ~1,345 cm−1).
Thermophysical characterization of 1 revealed that the material is stable up to 400°C at which point degradation of the organic cation is observed according to TGA (Ar atmosphere, Supplementary Figure 5). DSC also showed that the hybrid material undergoes no phase changes between 40 and 400°C despite containing imidazolium residues, which are common components of ILs, likely due to the highly symmetrical and sterically compact nature of the [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cations (see Supplementary Figure 6).
Crystal Structure of 1
Single crystals of 1 were obtained by layering a solution of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 in methanol onto a solution of K6P2W18O62 in DMF, yielding yellow needles after 1 week. 1 crystallizes in a triclinic crystal system corresponding to the P space group. Collection and refinement details and bond length, bond angle, hydrogen bond, and torsion angle tables can be found in the supporting information (Supplementary Tables 1–5). The asymmetric unit of 1 (Figure 2) consists of one Wells–Dawson polyoxotungstate anion [P2W18O62]6−, three [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cations, and three DMF solvent molecules that can be sensibly modeled. The residual electron density that cannot be assigned is calculated as 8 DMF molecules per asymmetric unit using PLATON SQUEEZE.
Figure 2. Asymmetric unit of 1 demonstrating that the three [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cations reside in distinct environments featuring different hydrogen bond contacts and different ring torsions. Dotted lines indicate hydrogen bonding; dotted lines to atom labels indicate hydrogen bonds with molecules beyond the asymmetric unit.
The three [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cations of the asymmetric unit reside in three locations: one is located close to the cap region of the POM (BTDImH1), whereas the other two reside closer to the belt regions (BTDImH2 and BTDImH3). No π-π stacking between the aromatic cations is observed. However, the cations make several hydrogen bonding contacts through the aromatic protons with oxygen atoms on the solvent or the POM (see Supplementary Table 4). The shortest hydrogen-bonded interactions are the imidazolium N–H protons of BTDImH1 with the amidic oxygen of the solvent [N12-O11S; 2.54(5) Å, N17-O6S; 2.676 Å] and the acidic C–H proton of the imidazolium ring with the terminal oxo group of the W-O on the POM cap [C11-O2; 3.06(4) Å]. BTDImH2 and BTDImH3 also feature short-range contacts between their non-acidic C–H protons and oxygen atoms of the solvent and POM. However, regardless of whether their bond lengths exceed 3.1 Å or their bond angles deviate from linearity by >20°, these are likely to be dictated largely by crystal packing considerations. Apart from their position, the three cations also differ from each other with respect to the degree of ring torsion between the imidazolium rings and the BTD aromatic core. All of the [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cations show significant deviation from planarity due to the presence of strong hydrogen bond acceptor groups on both the POM (terminal oxo) and the solvent (amide oxygen); in general, the degree of ring twisting shows a positive correlation with the number of hydrogen bonds that the imidazolium ring forms (Supplementary Tables 4, 5). For comparison, the crystal structure of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2, which has been published previously (Souza et al., 2020), shows each imidazolium ring making multiple hydrogen bonding contacts with proximal chloride anions, giving large ring torsion angles (Supplementary Figure 7). The presence of hydrogen bonding contacts between the POM and the organic cation that alters its structure demonstrates that the two components interact strongly in the solid state.
Electronic Characterization of 1
The electrochemical nature of 1 was probed using cyclic voltammetry. Given the electrical non-conductivity of 1 and its starting materials, it was necessary to prepare the solids as a carbon ink, which was immobilized to the surface of the glassy carbon. Figure 3 shows the cyclic voltammetry of K6P2W18O62, [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2, and 1; redox events have been labeled; and their potentials are given in Table 1. Firstly, in each voltammogram, it is immediately clear that there is a large contribution to the current due to the capacitive charging of the carbon matrix. This somewhat obfuscates the redox signals from the active species and makes measurements of the peak area difficult, so we have focused solely on the values of peak potential.
Figure 3. Solid-state cyclic voltammetry of 1 K6P2W18O62 (orange), [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 (pink), and 1 (black) performed in anhydrous acetonitrile (10 ml) with 0.1 M of TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte and reported vs. Fc+/Fc as an internal reference.
Table 1. Redox potentials measured for K6P2W18O62, [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2, and 1 according to the labeling scheme in Figure 3.
K6P2W18O62 shows two reductions with two associated oxidation peaks within the potential window, in accordance with solution state measurements of K6P2W18O62 in aprotic media; these correspond to two reversible one-electron reductions (Supplementary Figure 8). The electrochemistry of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 shows one reduction peak with a corresponding oxidation peak; the peak shape of the oxidation is suggestive of two overlapping one-electron processes, indicating that the reduction may be multielectron. The electrochemistry of the hybrid 1 shows four reduction peaks with associated oxidation peaks, the first two peaks (3a/3b) relate to POM-based electrochemical processes, and the third peak (3c) matches the organic cation reduction process seen in 3b. The final peak is likely to be the third reduction peak of the POM as seen in Supplementary Figure 6. Its appearance in the voltammogram of 1 may be the result of superior charge compensation of the more reduced states due to intimate packing of the organic BTD cations compared with potassium cations. Apart from this additional peak, the profile of 1 represents an overlay of the component salts with a slight negative shift in peak potential for each process (see Table 1).
The photoactivity of 1 and its starting materials were investigated via diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The diffuse reflectance spectrum of K6P2W18O62 exhibits multiple broad overlapping absorptions between 200 and 430 nm corresponding to various LMCT transitions within the structure in accordance with the literature (Ross-Medgaarden and Wachs, 2007). The organic cation [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 showed a typical profile of an aromatic framework with bands at 241, 310, and ~340 nm representing various π-π* transitions; this correlates well with the absorption bands measured in the solution (Supplementary Figure 1). However, the tailing of the lower-energy absorption in the solution state is not reflected in the solid state. This may be due to the slight distortion of the BTD-4,7-ImH molecules in the crystalline salt (Supplementary Figure 7) (Souza et al., 2020). With this in mind, we note that solution-phase analysis alone in the preparation of hybrid materials can at times paint only half of the picture, particularly when targeting potential applications in heterogeneous photocatalysis. The diffuse reflectance spectrum of 1 shows two prominent bands at 252 and 305 nm. These roughly correlate to absorption bands observed for the two photoactive components, and thus, no new bands arise from the combination of the POM with the organic cations. Nonetheless, it can be seen from Figure 4A that the absorbance of 1 in the UV region is considerably higher than that of either of the starting materials due to the pairing of two photoactive components.
Figure 4. (A) Diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectra of K6P2W18O62 (orange), [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 (pink), and 1 (black). (B) Magnification of the diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectra with extrapolation of the linear portion of the graph giving the x-intercept (see dotted lines and table inset).
The absorption edges of 1 and the starting materials were also calculated using the Kubelka–Munk function (Mirabella, 1998) as shown in Figure 4B. Interestingly, it was observed that the absorption edge of 1 (408 nm) is slightly blue shifted as compared with K6P2W18O62 (425 nm) and [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 (412 nm). This phenomenon was also observed in the calculated band gap from the Tauc plots (Viezbicke et al., 2015) (Figure 5), with 1 exhibiting the largest band gap of 3.13 eV, and K6P2W18O62 and [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 showed smaller band gaps of 2.98 and 3.05 eV, respectively. The larger band gap and higher absorption of 1 mean that the hybrid material could be of interest as a UV photocatalyst.
Figure 5. Tauc plots of K6P2W18O62 (orange), [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 (pink), and 1 (black) with extrapolation of the linear portion of the graph giving the x-intercept (see dotted lines and table inset).
Due to the reported fluorescent properties of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 in the solution (Souza et al., 2020), we were interested in investigating the fluorescence properties of the organic di-cation and the POM hybrid material 1 in the solid state (Figure 6). K6P2W18O62 shows no fluorescence in the solid state, whereas [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 shows a fluorescence peak at 435 nm with relative intensity of 2.41 × 106 cps when excited at its absorption maxima (310 nm), giving a Stokes shift of 125 nm. In contrast, 1 demonstrates a much weaker fluorescence at 502 nm with a relative intensity of 1.33 × 104 cps when excited at its absorption maxima (305 nm), resulting in a much larger Stokes shift of 197 nm. We also investigated the fluorescence behavior of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 and 1 at lower excitation wavelengths (300, 350, 400, and 450 nm) (Supplementary Figure 9). [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 shows a decay in fluorescence intensity moving toward lower energy excitation wavelengths as expected for a simple one-component system. Interestingly, the fluorescence intensity and peak maximum of 1 show considerable fluctuation based on the irradiation wavelength, likely due to differences in excited state populations between the two components, which affect the degree and mechanism of quenching.
Figure 6. (A) Solid-state fluorescence emission spectra of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 (pink) and 1 (black) with excitation at 305 nm. (B) Magnification of the fluorescence emission spectrum of 1 showing the emission maximum.
A reduction in fluorescence from 1 is to be expected purely based on the reduced molar equivalent of fluorescent species vs. [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 (16 vs. 79 wt%). However, this does not justify the ~200-fold reduction of fluorescence intensity, which is likely the static quenching of the [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ excited state by [P2W18O62]6−, as has been observed in other solid-state Class I POM hybrids (Menet et al., 2015). Thus, the absence of a charge transfer in the absorption profile but fluorescence quenching in the excited state suggests that excited-state electron transfer from [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ to [P2W18O62]6− is occurring. This observation is further supported by the new weak red-shifted emission, which has been similarly observed between adducts of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ with Wells–Dawson POMs and originates from emission of the adduct species following excited electron charge transfer (Keyes et al., 2003; Seery et al., 2004). The observed Stokes shift from a POM-based adduct with a luminescent cation is the largest reported to date, demonstrating the strong electronic interaction between the ions in the excited state. Overall, the wavelength-dependent behavior of 1 coupled with the large Stokes shift suggests a more intimate photophysical relationship beyond that expected by two components that independently compete for absorption of light at similar wavelengths.
To explore the feasibility of excited electron transfer between [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ and [P2W18O62]6− and the electronic nature of 1, the frontier orbital energies were estimated from the first reduction potential and the absorption edge. The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy is correlated to the first reduction potential, and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)–LUMO gap is calculated from the lowest energy electronic transition using Equations (1) and (2), respectively (Riaño et al., 2014).
The frontier orbital energies of K6P2W18O62, [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2, and 1 are summarized in Figure 7. Compared with K6P2W18O62, the HOMO and LUMO of 1 have become slightly stabilized and destabilized, respectively. The minimal changes to the HOMO–LUMO energies of 1 compared with K6P2W18O62 and the lack of observable charge transfer phenomena suggest that the components are electronically isolated in the ground state with no orbital mixing; however, the drastic change in fluorescence behavior is indicative of electron transfer in the excited state.
To explore this, we considered the photoexcitation behavior of 1 based on the frontier orbital energies of the component salts. In the ground state, the HOMO of [BTD-4,7-ImH]Cl2 is lower in energy than the LUMO of K6P2W18O62 and so is the HOMO of K6P2W18O62 relative to the LUMO of the organic component. Accordingly, there is a large energetic barrier for charge transfer in either direction in the ground state. However, once the organic cation undergoes photoexcitation, the electron is promoted to the LUMO, which lies above the LUMO of the POM (0.773 eV driving force), thus allowing for charge transfer in the excited state. We propose that the charge separated state eventually relaxes to the ground state through back-electron transfer to the HOMO of the organic cation via a low-energy meta-stable state, leading to the observation of a new fluorescence band with a large Stokes shift. The emission is heavily quenched, likely due to competing non-radiative relaxation mechanisms (Figure 8).
Figure 8. Proposed photoexcitation mechanism of 1. (A) Photoexcitation of the [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cation. (B) Charge transfer from the [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cation to the polyoxometalate (POM). (C) Back electron transfer from the POM to a lower-energy meta-stable state of the [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cation. (D) Relaxation of the excited state via fluorescence (minor) and non-radiative decay (major).
In summary, we have synthesized a cooperative photoactive Class I POM hybrid using the Wells–Dawson POM anion [P2W18O62]6− and a fluorescent BTD cationic dye [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+. The resultant hybrid, 1, shows strong interaction of the inorganic and organic components via electrostatic association and hydrogen bonding contacts as seen by single-crystal XRD. The optical properties of 1 show absorption features of both components; however, the resultant material had a larger band gap than either of the starting materials. The fluorescence of the [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cations was heavily quenched in the solid state upon association with the POM; however, no charge transfer character is observed in the absorption spectrum. Furthermore, the weakened fluorescence of 1 has a very large Stokes shift as compared with that of [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+, indicating that electron transfer occurs from the dye molecule to the POM upon photoexcitation. The feasibility of such a process was confirmed by estimating the frontier orbitals of the two components and demonstrating that the LUMO of the [BTD-4,7-ImH]2+ cation was higher in energy than the LUMO of [P2W18O62]6−, thus providing a thermodynamic driving force for such an event to occur and validating the observed difference in fluorescence behavior. Given the high absorption intensity between 300 and 425 nm and large band gap of 1, we are currently investigating the hybrid as a heterogeneous artificial photosynthesis catalyst.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
AK performed the experimental work and data interpretation and wrote the manuscript. VS aided in the preparation of the BTD materials. JF assisted in the solid-state photochemical measurements and data interpretation. WL and SA assisted in crystallography measurements and solving the structure. JD contributed to the development of the BTD systems and contributed to project discussions. GN devised the project and co-wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
This work was supported by the EPSRC: EP/L015633/1.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the University of Nottingham's Propulsion Futures Beacon. AK thanks the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Sustainable Chemistry (EP/L015633/1) for his studentship. The authors are grateful to Dr. Graham A. Rance of the Nanoscale and Microscale Research Centre (nmRC) for assistance with Raman spectroscopy analysis. The authors thank Tong Liu (School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham) for the elemental analysis measurements.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2020.612535/full#supplementary-material
Baldoví, J. J., Cardona-Serra, S., Gaita-Ariño, A., and Coronado, E. (2017). “Chapter eight - design of magnetic polyoxometalates for molecular spintronics and as spin qubits,” in Polyoxometalate Chemistry, eds R. van Eldik and L. Cronin (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 213–249.
Bonchio, M., Syrgiannis, Z., Burian, M., Marino, N., Pizzolato, E., Dirian, K., et al. (2019). Hierarchical organization of perylene bisimides and polyoxometalates for photo-assisted water oxidation. Nat. Chem. 11, 146–153. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0172-y
Chong, D., Wan, X., and Zhang, J. (2017). Charge-transfer complexes of dinuclear ruthenium compounds/polyoxometalates for multistate electrochromism covering ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared region. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 6442–6449. doi: 10.1039/C7TC01526G
Dolbecq, A., Dumas, E., Mayer, C. R., and Mialane, P. (2010). Hybrid organic–inorganic polyoxometalate compounds: from structural diversity to applications. Chem. Rev. 110, 6009–6048. doi: 10.1021/cr1000578
Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K., and Puschmann, H. (2009). OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 339–341. doi: 10.1107/S0021889808042726
Ettedgui, J., Diskin-Posner, Y., Weiner, L., and Neumann, R. (2011). Photoreduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide with hydrogen catalyzed by a rhenium(I) phenanthroline–polyoxometalate hybrid complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 188–190. doi: 10.1021/ja1078199
Fell, V. H. K., Findlay, N. J., Breig, B., Forbes, C., Inigo, A. R., Cameron, J., et al. (2019). Effect of end group functionalisation of small molecules featuring the fluorene–thiophene–benzothiadiazole motif as emitters in solution-processed red and orange organic light-emitting diodes. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 3934–3944. doi: 10.1039/C8TC02993H
Herrmann, S., Ritchie, C., and Streb, C. (2015). Polyoxometalate – conductive polymer composites for energy conversion, energy storage and nanostructured sensors. Dalt. Trans. 44, 7092–7104. doi: 10.1039/C4DT03763D
Jordan, J. W., Lowe, G. A., McSweeney, R. L., Stoppiello, C. T., Lodge, R. W., Skowron, S. T., et al. (2019). Host-guest hybrid redox materials self-assembled from polyoxometalates and single-walled carbon nanotubes. Adv. Mater. 31:1904182. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904182
Kastner, K., Kibler, A. J, Karjalainen, E., Fernandes, J. A., Sans, V., and Newtonm, G. N. (2017). Redox-active organic-inorganic hybrid polyoxometalate micelles. J. Mater. Chem. A. 5, 11577–11581. doi: 10.1039/c7ta00408g
Keyes, T. E., Gicquel, E., Guerin, L., Forster, R. J., Hultgren, V., Bond, A. M., et al. (2003). Photophysical and novel charge-transfer properties of adducts between [RuII(bpy)3]2+ and [S2Mo18O62]4-. Inorg. Chem. 42, 7897–7905. doi: 10.1021/ic0206802
Kibler, A., and Newton, G. N. (2018). Tuning the electronic structure of organic-inorganic hybrid polyoxometalates: the crucial role of the covalent linkage. Polyhedron 154, 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2018.06.027
Kibler, A. J., Martín, C., Cameron, J. M., Rogalska, A., Dupont, J., Walsh, D. A., et al. (2019). Physical and electrochemical modulation of polyoxometalate ionic liquids via organic functionalization. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 456–460. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201800578
Lv, H., Geletii, Y. V., Zhao, C., Vickers, J. W., Zhu, G., Luo, Z., et al. (2012). Polyoxometalate water oxidation catalysts and the production of green fuel. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7572–7589. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35292c
Martin, C., Kastner, K., Cameron J, M., Hampson, E., Fernandes, J. A., Gibson, E. K., et al. (2020). Redox-active hybrid polyoxometalate-stabilized gold nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 14331–14335. doi: 10.1002/anie.202005629
Menet, C., Serier-Brault, H., Oms, O., Dolbecq, A., Marrot, J., Saad, A., et al. (2015). Influence of electronic vs. steric factors on the solid-state photochromic performances of new polyoxometalate/spirooxazine and spiropyran hybrid materials. RSC Adv. 5, 79635–79643. doi: 10.1039/C5RA15860E
Neto, B. A. D., Carvalho, P. H. P. R., and Correa, J. R. (2015). Benzothiadiazole derivatives as fluorescence imaging probes: beyond classical scaffolds. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1560–1569. doi: 10.1021/ar500468p
Riaño, A., Mayorga Burrezo, P., Mancheño, M. J., Timalsina, A., Smith, J., Facchetti, A., et al. (2014). The unusual electronic structure of ambipolar dicyanovinyl-substituted diketopyrrolopyrrole derivatives. J. Mater. Chem. C 2, 6376–6386. doi: 10.1039/C4TC00714J
Ross-Medgaarden, E. I., and Wachs, I. E. (2007). Structural determination of bulk and surface tungsten oxides with UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 15089–15099. doi: 10.1021/jp074219c
Seery, M. K., Guerin, L., Forster, R. J., Gicquel, E., Hultgren, V., Bond, A. M., et al. (2004). Photophysics of ion clusters formed between [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and the polyoxotungstate anion [S2W18O62]4-. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 7399–7405. doi: 10.1021/jp0482464
Souza, V. S., Corrêa, J. R., Carvalho, P. H. P. R., Zanotto, G. M., Matiello, G. I., Guido, B. C., et al. (2020). Appending ionic liquids to fluorescent benzothiadiazole derivatives: light up and selective lysosome staining. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 321:128530. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128530
Spek, A. L. (2015). PLATON SQUEEZE: a tool for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution to the calculated structure factors. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 71, 9–18. doi: 10.1107/S2053229614024929
Varga, M., Török, B., and Molnár, Á. (1998). Thermal stability of heteropoly acids and characterization of the water content in the Keggin structure. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 53, 207–215. doi: 10.1023/A:1010192309961
Viezbicke, B. D., Patel, S., Davis, B. E., and Birnie, D. P. III. (2015). Evaluation of the Tauc method for optical absorption edge determination: ZnO thin films as a model system. Phys. Status Solidi 252, 1700–1710. doi: 10.1002/pssb.201552007
Xu, H., Li, Z., Liu, B., Xue, G., Hu, H., Fu, F., et al. (2010). Charge-transfer salts via cocrystallization of the cationic ferrocenyl donor with polyoxometalate acceptors. Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 1096–1103. doi: 10.1021/cg900777g
Yuan, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, L., Zhang, C., Lau, T.-K., Zhang, G., et al. (2019). Fused benzothiadiazole: a building block for n-type organic acceptor to achieve high-performance organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 31:1807577. doi: 10.1002/adma.201807577
Zhang, W.-Q., Cheng, K., Yang, X., Li, Q.-Y., Zhang, H., Ma, Z., et al. (2017). A benzothiadiazole-based fluorescent sensor for selective detection of oxalyl chloride and phosgene. Org. Chem. Front. 4, 1719–1725. doi: 10.1039/C7QO00378A
Zhang, Z.-M., Zhang, T., Wang, C., Lin, Z., Long, L.-S., and Lin, W. (2015). Photosensitizing metal–organic framework enabling visible-light-driven proton reduction by a Wells–Dawson-type polyoxometalate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3197–3200. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00075
Keywords: polyoxometalate, hybrid material, organic dye, electron transfer, class-I hybrid, photochemistry
Citation: Kibler AJ, Souza VS, Fernandes JA, Lewis W, Argent SP, Dupont J and Newton GN (2021) A Cooperative Photoactive Class-I Hybrid Polyoxometalate With Benzothiadiazole–Imidazolium Cations. Front. Chem. 8:612535. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.612535
Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 09 December 2020;
Published: 14 January 2021.
Edited by:Maxim N. Sokolov, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Russia
Reviewed by:Carsten Streb, University of Ulm, Germany
Marie-Pierre Santoni, Université de Paris, France
Copyright © 2021 Kibler, Souza, Fernandes, Lewis, Argent, Dupont and Newton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Graham N. Newton, firstname.lastname@example.org