Seeded Growth of Au@CuxO Core–Shell Mesoporous Nanospheres and Their Photocatalytic Properties

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Graphical Abstract. Au@CuxO core–shell mesoporous nanospheres with tunable sizes are prepared, exhibiting superior activities in photodegradation of organic dyes.

Introduction

Metal-semiconductor core–shell nanocrystals have attracted enormous research interests in recent years due to their enhanced optical properties (Wu et al., 2004; Jin and Gao, 2009; Carbone and Cozzoli, 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). This is because the surface plasmon wave on the metal surface can be used to excite electrons of metal, transfer to the conduction band of semiconductor, and recombine with holes in the valence band (Kamat and Shanghavi, 1997; Scott et al., 2012). Also, the metal nanoparticles with well-controlled size and morphology can work as the seeding material to direct the growth of the semiconductor shell with tunable shape and structure. Such manipulation could be crucial if the physiochemical properties of the semiconductor material were highly related to their morphology or even facet dependent. Taking Au@Cu₂O core–shell nanocrystals for example. Thanks to the research efforts from many groups. It is now possible to fabricate Au@Cu₂O core–shell nanocrystals via a myriad of strategies, and the structure-performance relationship was established and investigated (Wang et al., 2008, 2011, 2016b; Pang et al., 2012b; Meir et al., 2013; Hsu et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2015; Asenath-Smith et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2018, 2019; Zhu et al., 2020b). Recent progress has allowed the plasmon mode tuning of the Au@Cu₂O core–shell structure (Liu et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016a) and explored its applications in the fields, such as photovoltaic (Oener et al., 2015) surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) (Chen et al., 2017), photocatalysis (Niu et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018; Kuo et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2021), electrocatalysis (Tan et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020), water splitting (Wang et al., 2017), photothermal (Wang et al., 2016a; Yang et al., 2016), and sensing (Rai et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015; Su et al., 2018; Long et al., 2019).

Typical studies as pioneered by Huang et al. have systematically demonstrated the facet-dependent optical properties and conductive behavior of polyhedral Au–Cu₂O core–shell nanocrystals (Kuo et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2014; Hsia et al., 2018). Recently, Wang and his coworkers have reported a wet-chemical strategy for precise tuning geometrical parameters of the Au–Cu₂O core–shell nanoparticles. Owing to the advantage of controlled synthesis, the synergistic light absorption and scattering properties of the particles over a broad spectral range across the visible and near-infrared regions could be systematically and selectively tuned (Zhang et al., 2011). The morphology of Au@Cu₂O core–shell nanoparticles was also found to impact the gas-sensing performance toward carbon monoxide, where the shape transformation from brick to a sphere significantly lowered the air resistance (Majhi et al., 2014). To this end, it is highly desirable to develop the rational synthesis of Au@Cu₂O core–shell nanostructures with controlled size and morphology to realize manipulation over physiochemical properties.

Compared with counterparts with a solid interior, mesoporous structure exhibits intrinsic advantages. This is because more channels for reactant can be provided to diffuse into the catalyst body and thus allow maximized exposure of surface atoms of the catalyst, leading to the increased quantity of active sites (Lai and Koper, 2010; Lim et al., 2010; Pang et al., 2012a). The confined porous space could also increase the localized concentration of key intermediates, which helps accelerate the reaction kinetics for the following conversion. Recent studies have also indicated that the synergetic effect arising from central atoms with multiple oxidation states was found to be beneficial for the enhancement in catalysis (Zhang et al., 2016b; Zhu et al., 2020a). All these concepts contribute to the advance in the catalytic process, and the integration of these technical elements in one catalyst particle for enhancing catalytic performance should be expected.

Herein, we report a facile synthesis of Au@Cu_xO core–shell microporous nanospheres (MPNSs), with tunable size in the aqueous phase via seeded growth. The success of the current work relies on the use of the halide-free copper (Cu) precursor and n-oleyl-1,3-propanediamine (OPDA) as the capping agent to facilitate the formation of a copperish oxide shell with a mesoporous structure and the presence of mixed oxidation states of Cu. The growth process was tracked and analyzed, using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and an X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). By varying the amount of spherical Au seeds while keeping other parameters unchanged, their diameters could be readily tuned without noticeable change in morphology. The effect of the Cu precursor on product morphology was investigated. We also explored their applications as the catalyst for photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO) under visible light irradiation, and they exhibited a higher adsorption capability, and an enhanced-catalytic-activity-excellent stability, as compared with commercial Cu₂O.

Experimental Details

Materials

Gold (III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl₄·3H₂O, 99.9%), copper chloride dehydrate (CuCl₂·2H₂O, 99%), copper bromide (CuBr₂, 99%), copper nitrate trihydrate [Cu(NO₃)₂·3H₂O, 99%], copper sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO₄·5H₂O, 99%), copper acetate monohydrate [C₄H₆CuO₄·H₂O, Cu(OAc)₂·H₂O, 99%], copper citrate [C₆H₄Cu₂O₇, Cu₂(CA), 99.5%], copper acetylacetonate [C₁₀H₁₄CuO₄, Cu(acac)₂, 97%], copper(I) oxide (Cu₂O, 97.0%), ascorbic acid (AA, 99.0%), sodium borohydride (NaBH₄, 98%), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 99%), and hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC, 97%) were all obtained from Aladdin Chemical (Shanghai, China) and used as received. n-Oleyl-1,3-propanediamine (OPDA, ≥95%) was obtained from AkzoNobel and used as received. MO (99%) was obtained from Sinopharm (Shanghai, China) and used as received. Nanosized titanium dioxide powder of P25 was purchased from Degussa and used as received. In all experiments, deionized water is used with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm, which was prepared using an ultrapure water system (Ulupure, Beijing, China).

Standard Synthetic Procedure for Au@Cu_xO Core–Shell MPNSs

The 10-nm, spherical Au seeds were generated, using the protocol as described in the previous study (Zheng et al., 2013a). In the following synthesis, 50 mg of Cu(acac)₂, 200 μl of OPDA, and 200 μL of 10-nm Au seed stock solution were mixed with 10 ml of water in a 20 ml glass vial, followed by the addition of aqueous solution of AA (100 mM, 2 ml) and heating at 100°C in an oil bath for 30 min. The reaction was cooled in ice water, collected by centrifugation (16,000 rpm, 10 min), and washed with water once prior to characterization and further use.

Photodegradation Test

Mild test conditions [room temperature, neutral solution, and simulated sunlight (500 W halide lamp; Philips)] were adopted in our experiments. The MO was used as the degraded substance to evaluate the photodegradation catalytic performance. Two milligrams of the catalysts, which was mixed with 18 ml of water containing 160 micrograms of MO and stirred for 30 min in the dark to reach adsorption equilibrium. Then, the simulated sunlight turned on with starting the clock. About 1 ml of aliquots was taken out at the time interval of 30 min, followed by filtration, using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter, having a filtration accuracy of.2 μm and centrifugation at 16,000 rpm for 10 min to remove the catalysts. The absorbance of as-filtered solution was measured by the UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer.

Instrumentation

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), electron diffraction (ED), high-angle annular dark field-scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM), and EDX-STEM mapping were performed using a Talos F200X (FEI, United States) microscope operated at the acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Zeiss Ultra60 microscope operated at 12 kV. All extinction and diffuse-reflectance spectra were recorded using a T9 dual-beam UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Persee, China). Nitrogen adsorption and desorption measurements were carried out with a gas adsorption instrument (3H-2000PS2, BeiShiDe Instrument, China), and the surface area of the samples was calculated according to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The pore size distribution curves were obtained by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method from the nitrogen adsorption data.

Results and Discussion

Tracking the Formation Process

In a typical synthesis, the Cu precursor was reduced by ascorbic acid in the presence of spherical Au seeds and the capping agent OPDA at 100°C in the aqueous phase. To track the growth process, we terminated the reaction at different periods, followed by taking aliquots out from the reaction mixture for analysis using SEM and XRD to elucidate the evolution in morphology and structure. As shown in Figure 1, spherical nanoparticles were generated at t = 5 min and t = 15 min, and they grew in size when the reaction proceeded to 30 min. Further reaction (i.e., t = 45 min and t = 60 min) led to the formation of the products without noticeable variation in morphology but an increase in particle size. These products were also taken for XRD analysis to examine the variation in the crystal phase (Figure 2). No obvious diffraction peak could be identified for the products formed at t = 5 min and t = 15 min, which should be attributed to the poor crystallinity of the products formed at the initial stages. A diffraction peak located at two-theta of 36.4°, 42.3°, and 61.4° can be observed for the products formed at t = 30 min, which could be indexed to the (111), (200), and (220) crystal plane of the Cu₂O phase (JCPDS No. 78-2076), respectively. For the products obtained at t = 45 min, in addition to the Cu₂O phase, the diffraction peak at two-theta of 43.2°, corresponding to the (111) crystal plane of the Cu phase (JCPDS No. 70-3038), began to appear in the XRD pattern. Further reaction (t = 60 min) led to the conversion of the products fully into the Cu phase, where the decreased full width at half maxima (FWHM) of diffraction peaks suggested a better crystallinity. Taken together, these results suggested that, as the reaction proceeded, the products grew with increase in particle size and improvement in crystallinity and their crystal phase gradually converted from Cu₂O to Cu. To this end, in order to achieve the product with a mixed crystal phase, the reaction time should be carefully controlled, and t = 30 min was chosen for the following synthesis (Koch et al., 2019).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. The time-lapse study of the growth process for Au@Cu_xO core–shell nanostructures. (a–e) The SEM images and (f) the corresponding XRD patterns of the products obtained at different reaction stages of the standard procedure: (a) 5 min, (b) 15 min, (c) 30 min, (d) 45 min, and (e) 60 min, respectively.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. The XRD patterns of samples as displayed in Figure 1.

Morphology and Structure Characterization of Au@Cu_xO Core–Shell MPNSs

A low-magnified SEM image of the Au@Cu_xO products obtained at 30 min shows high uniformity in terms of size, morphology, and structure (Supplementary Figure 1). To further characterize their structure, we performed a set of characterizations, in addition to SEM, including TEM, HAADF-STEM, EDX-STEM mapping, and ED. As shown in Figures 3a,b, TEM images confirmed its core–shell and mesoporous structure. A polymer layer was noticed to be residual on the particle surface, which suggested strong covalent bonding between Cu and OPDA since these products were carefully washed with water and toluene several times. Their size was measured to be 119 ± 11 nm by statistically counting 100 typical particles (Supplementary Figure 2). Multiple diffraction circles in the ED pattern indicated their polycrystalline structure (Figure 3c). We also conducted HADDF-STEM (Figure 3d) and EDX-STEM mapping (Figures 3e–g) to investigate their elemental distribution. The EDX-STEM elemental mapping images confirmed that the elemental Au is located in the center, while elemental O is distributed in the dendritic shell. Consequently, the presence of Au seeds inside the mesoporous body could be clearly identified, demonstrating its core–shell structure. Strong intensity as a thin layer of Cu was noticed near the seed surface, indicating more Cu was distributed in this region. Figure 3h shows EDX cross-sectional line scanning, and the line profile exhibited a core–shell structure, as evidenced by the intensities of Au in the center being stronger.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Morphology and structural characterizations of Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs as displayed in Figure 1c: (a,b) TEM, (c) ED, (d) HAADF-STEM, (e–g) EDX-mapping: (e) Au, (f) Cu, (g) O; (h) line-scan spectrum. The inset in (e) shows a corresponding particle with a scale bar of 50 nm.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements were conducted to further investigate the surface structure and electronic properties. The presence of C 1s and N 1s peaks should be attributed to the residual OPDA molecules on the particle surface (Figure 4). The strong O 1s peak indicated the presence of metal oxide. For Cu 2p, several sets of peaks were noticed: (i) the peaks located at 933.1 and 952.8 eV, respectively, corresponding to Cu(0) 2p_3/2 and Cu(0) 2p_1/2, respectively; (ii) the peaks located at 931.8 and 951.9 eV, respectively, corresponding to Cu(I) 2p_3/2 and Cu(I) 2p_1/2, respectively; (iii) the peak located at 942.9 eV, corresponding to Cu(II) 2p_3/2. To this end, the mixed oxidation state of Cu(0), Cu(I), and Cu(II) was confirmed. The presence of Cu(0) and Cu(I) should be attributed to the crystal phase of Cu and Cu₂O, as demonstrated by the XRD analysis, where the presence of Cu(II) should be caused by, partially, oxidation by atmospheric oxygen during sample preparation. The Au 4f peak was missing, which should be attributed to its limited amount in the products. Taken together, we can confirm the as-prepared products had a core–shell architecture, with a polycrystalline structure, as well as the composition of Au@Cu_xO and mixed oxidation states of Cu.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra of 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs: (A) a survey scan, (B) Cu 2p; (C) Au 4f, (D) O 1s, and (E) VB.

Effect of Cu Precursor on Product Morphology

In the current work, Cu(acac)₂ was employed as the Cu precursor. To evaluate the effect of the precursor on product morphology, we tried to reconduct the standard procedure by replacing Cu(acac)₂ with other types of Cu salts or coordination compounds while keeping other conditions unchanged. As shown in Figures 5a,b, the use of the Cu precursor with halide ions, such as CuCl₂ and CuBr₂, led to the formation of products with a solid interior as well as well-defined polyhedral morphologies, such as cube, right bipyramid, and pentagonal rod/wire. In contrast, the use of the other types of the halide-free Cu precursor, such as Cu(NO₃)₂, CuSO₄, Cu(OAc)₂, and Cu(CA)₂, resulted in the generation of the products with similar mesoporous structure, but the particle size varied (Figures 5c–f). These results indicated that the absence of halide ion in the reaction solution was crucial to the formation of the products with a mesoporous structure. As indicated in the previous study, halide ion can cooperate with atmospheric oxygen to form an etchant pair and such an oxidative etching can effectively remove twinned particles during the synthesis of noble-metal nanocrystals. Compared with the polyhedral counterparts, the products with a mesoporous structure had a large number of defective regions in the particle, and these regions were sensitive and vulnerable under oxidative etching environment (Zheng et al., 2013b). To this end, the presence of halide ions would play a negative role in their successive growth and stable existence in the final products.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. The effect of the Cu precursor on product morphology. The SEM images of the products obtained via the standard procedure, except that the Cu precursor was replaced by: (a) CuCl₂, (b) CuBr₂, (c) Cu(NO₃)₂, (d) CuSO₄, (e) Cu(OAc)₂, and (f) Cu(CA)₂, respectively.

Effect of Capping Agent on Product Morphology

Compared with aliphatic amine used in the previous studies, such as hexadecylamine and oleylamine, OPDA has a similar molecule as that of oleylamine, except for an extra amine group. The increase in molecular polarity can help the capping agent stabilize the Cu-based nanoparticle with improved colloidal stability in the aqueous phase. To investigate the effect of the capping agent, we tried to conduct experiments by replacing the capping agent OPDA with oleylamine and octadecylamine, respectively while keeping the other reaction parameters unchanged. As shown in Supplementary Figure 3, the resultant products no longer exhibited a mesoporous structure while tiny particles were obtained. It could be attributed to the fact that OPDA has better colloidal stability in water, as well as a stronger coordination strength with Cu to impact its reduction kinetics.

Tuning the Size of Au@Cu_xO Core–Shell MPNSs

As an advantage of seeded growth, the diameter of resultant Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs could be readily tuned by simply varying the volume of the Au seed stock solution. In particular, as shown in Figure 6, the resultant products kept the morphology of MPNS without noticeable variation, but the diameter was reduced to 94 ± 10 and 87 ± 22 nm, respectively, when the volume of Au seed stock solution was increased to 500 and 1,000 μl, respectively. Their diameter distribution information was provided in Supplementary Figures 4, 5 by statistically counting 100 typical particles in corresponding SEM images. Corresponding XPS spectra confirmed that, despite the change in size, the resultant products still exhibited the presence of Cu with multiple valent states (Supplementary Figures 6, 7).

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. (a,c) Low- and (b,d) high-magnified SEM images of products obtained via the standard procedure, except that the volume of Au seed stock solution was set to (a,b) 1,000 μl and (c,d) 500 μl, respectively.

Photocatalytic Degradation

It is well-accepted that Cu₂O-based nanostructures can work on the effect of a catalyst toward photocatalysis. We selected the photodegradation of MO under visible light as the model reaction and employed the as-prepared Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs with different sizes to test their performance in applications of photocatalysis. Commercial Cu₂O powder and commercial TiO₂ nanoparticles of P25 were employed as the reference materials. The corresponding SEM image shows a broad size range of 20 nm−2 μm and quasispherical particle shape (Supplementary Figure 8). According to Beer–Lambert law, total concentrations of MO are simply determined, using the value of absorbance at λ = 464 nm as measured via UV-vis extinction spectroscopy. C/C₀ was used to describe the degradation (C and C₀ refer to mass concentrations of MO at time of t and t₀, respectively). On the basis of the above batch experiments, the suspensions were magnetically stirred in the dark for 30 min to establish adsorption/desorption equilibrium of MO on the catalysts prior to photocatalytic tests.

The comparison of photocatalytic activity of as-prepared Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs, commercial Cu₂O, and P25 NPs is shown in Figure 7A and Supplementary Figures 9–13. We noticed that right after the addition of catalysts, the C/C₀ significantly dropped for the groups using Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs (34.8, 31.4, and 27.7% for 119-, 94-, and 87-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs, while 83.7 and 94.4% for commercial Cu₂O and P25), indicating that they had a rapid and high adsorption capability toward MO. Also, the Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs display much higher photocatalytic activity than commercial Cu₂O and P25, where about 97.8, 98.1, and 98.5% of MO molecules can be completely decomposed within 120 min for 119-, 94-, and 87-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs, which are much higher than that of the other catalysts (i.e., 54.3% for commercial Cu₂O and 27.0% for P25).

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. (A) Photodegradation of MO over P25, commercial Cu₂O (CM Cu₂O), and as-prepared Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs with different diameters under visible light irradiation. (B) Cycling runs in the photodegradation of MO in the presence of 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs. t₀ refers to the time point at which no catalyst is added to MO dispersion yet.

To verify the stability and reusability, cycling experiments of the 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs catalysts were performed, where they were collected, purified, and reused in the next round of photodegradation. As shown in Figure 7B and Supplementary Figures 14–16, the 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs for the degradation of MO exhibit a high activity and good recyclability as the conversion just a slight decline even after 12-h cycling tests. In particular, the degradation efficiency for MO was 99.5, 90.2, and 79.6%, respectively, for the consequential three cycles, respectively, confirming that the 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs were stable during visible-light photocatalysis.

To investigate the mechanism responsible for the enhanced activity in the photocatalytic test, we performed a set of characterizations toward these photocatalysts to analyze their difference in the bandgap structure and the surface area. For example, UV-Vis extinction spectra of as-prepared Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs with different sizes suspended in water were recorded to investigate their optical response (Figure 8A). Unlike the red color of typical Cu₂O powder, the aqueous suspensions of these Au@Cu_xO core–shell were all green in color, displaying a strong absorbance in a visible range (Supplementary Figure 17). The extrapolated value (a straight line to the x-axis) of E_photon at at α = 0 gives absorption edge energies corresponding to E_g, which is the bandgap of the material, which follows plots of α${\text{E}}_{\text{photon}}^{1/2}$, vs. the energy of absorbed light (where α and E_photon refer to the absorbance and the discrete photon energy, respectively). Figure 8B shows that the optical absorption gaps were 2.28, 2.31, and 2.36 eV for 119-, 94-, and 87-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs, respectively. The UV-vis diffuse-reflectance spectrum of commercial Cu₂O diffuse-reflectance spectrum of commercial Cu₂O powder was also recorded, and the optical absorption gap was determined to be 1.97 eV (Jing et al., 2014). The bandgap of Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs was larger than that of commercial Cu₂O, and it increased along with a decrease in diameter, which could be attributed to the with a decrease in diameter, which could be attributed to the quantum size effect (Ekimov et al., 1993).

FIGURE 8

Figure 8. (A) Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy extinction spectra of Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs with different diameters and UV-vis diffuse-reflectance spectra of commercial Cu₂O. (B) Bandgap evaluation from the plots of (αE_photon)^1/2 vs. the energy of the absorbed light.

The valence band XPS spectra (VB-XPS), near the Fermi level, were provided to explore the electronic structure of the as-prepared samples. The valence band maximum (VBM) edge potentials of Cu ion were measured by the VB-XPS spectra to demonstrate the band alignment that occurred for commercial Cu₂O and Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs. As shown in Figure 9, the edge of VBM energy of Au@Cu_xO MPNSs, with the diameter of 119, 94, and 87 nm, as well as commercial Cu₂O, was determined to be about 0.38, 0.38, 0.38, and 0.33 eV, indicating that the VBM position of Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs shifted toward high-binding energy. Combined with the UV-Vis data above, the conduction band minimum (CBM) was calculated to be−1.90 eV, −1.93, −1.98, and −1.64 eV for Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs, with the diameter of 119, 94, and 87 nm, as well as commercial Cu₂O, respectively. Herein, the higher binding energy of VBM made the valance band potential more positive, together with a wider bandgap caused by the quantum size effect, which would significantly contribute to the enhanced redox capacity and photocatalytic activity (Alivisatos, 1996; Smith and Nie, 2010).

FIGURE 9

Figure 9. Valence band-XPS spectra of Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs with different diameters and commercial Cu₂O.

In addition, nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution curves of 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs and commercial Cu₂O were recorded to illustrate the difference in the specific surface area and the porosity of the two types of the product. As shown in Figure 10, the specific surface area of commercial Cu₂O powder and 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs was measured to 1.97 and 14.6 m²g⁻¹, respectively, and the corresponding average pore size was determined to be 2.67 and 2.55 nm, respectively. Compared with commercial Cu₂O powder, the Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs show the unique mesoporous structure as well as limited particle size, which can supply a large amount of accessible surface area and active sites during photocatalysis.

FIGURE 10

Figure 10. (A,C) N₂ adsorption–desorption isotherms and (B,D) pore size distribution plots of (A,B) commercial Cu₂O powder, and (C,D) 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs.

Summary

In summary, Au@Cu_xO core–shell nanospheres with mesoporous structure and mixed valance states of Cu have been successfully prepared via a seed-mediated synthesis. The use of the halide-free Cu precursor and OPDA as the capping agent was found crucial to the formation of Au@Cu_xO core–shell nanocrystals with a unique mesoporous structure. Their size could be tuned without noticeable loss in the unique morphology. Due to the advantage in structure, the current product exhibits an enhanced absorption capability and photocatalytic degradation performance toward typical organic pollutant MO. In particular, 97.8% of MO molecules can be completely decomposed within 120 min with visible light irradiation, and the degradation efficiency maintained at around 80% after a 12-h cycling test using the 119-nm Au@Cu_xO core–shell MPNSs as the photocatalyst. The current strategy offers a facile synthesis of metal-semiconductor hybrid nanostructures with abundant active catalytic sites and could be extended to other material combinations for photocatalysis.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

GZ: experiment, writing—original draft, and data curation. YZ: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, and writing—reviewing and editing. YM, ML, FL, WZ, ZT, and JS: formal analysis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21701100), Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province (Grant No. 2019GGX102081), Key Research and Development Project of Jining (Grant No. 2019ZDGH026), Young Innovative Talents Introduction & Cultivation Program for Colleges, and the Universities of Shandong Province [granted by Department of Education of Shandong Province, Subtitle: Innovative Research Team on Optoelectronic Functional Materials and Doctoral Startup Research Funding of Jining University (No. 2020BSZX01)].

This work is also supported by an open project (Grant No. KJS2022) of Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials & Devices (Soochow University), Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science & Technology, the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), the 111 Project, and the Joint International Research Laboratory of Carbon-Based Functional Materials and Devices.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer NL declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors ML to the handling Editor.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.671220/full#supplementary-material

References

Alivisatos, A. P. (1996). Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 271, 933–937. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5251.933

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asenath-Smith, E., Noble, J. M., Hovden, R., Uhl, A. M., Dicorato, A., Kim, Y.-Y., et al. (2017). Physical confinement promoting formation of Cu₂O–Au heterostructures with Au nanoparticles entrapped within crystalline Cu₂O nanorods. Chem. Mater. 29, 555–563. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03653

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carbone, L., and Cozzoli, P. D. (2010). Colloidal heterostructured nanocrystals: synthesis and growth mechanisms. Nano Today 5, 449–493. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, F.-C., Chen, J.-Y., Lin, Y.-H., Kuo, M.-Y., Hsu, Y.-J., and Wu, W.-W. (2019). In situ TEM observation of Au-Cu₂O core-shell growth in liquids. Nanoscale 11, 10486–10492. doi: 10.1039/C9NR00972H

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L., Zhang, F., Deng, X. Y., Xue, X., and Jung, Y. M. (2017). SERS study of surface plasmon resonance induced carrier movement in Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanoparticles. Spectrochim. Acta A 189:608. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.08.065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, R., Lu, J., Liu, S., Zheng, M., and Wang, Z. (2018). The preparation of Cu₂O@Au yolk/shell structures for efficient photocatalytic activity with a self-generated acid etching method. J. Mater. Sci. 53, 1781–1790. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1614-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, T., Tian, L., Chen, Y., Liu, B., and Zhang, J. (2015). A facile one-pot synthesis of Au/Cu₂O nanocomposites for nonenzymatic detection of hydrogen peroxide. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 10, 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s11671-015-0935-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ekimov, A. I., Efros, A. L., and Onushchenko, A. A. (1993). Quantum size effect in semiconductor microcrystals. Solid State Commun. 56, 921–924. doi: 10.1016/S0038-1098(85)80025-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, L., Mao, Z., Ma, C., Wu, J., Zhu, L., Zhao, B., et al. (2021). Charge transfer in 4-mercaptobenzoic acid-stabilized Au Nanorod@Cu₂O nanostructures: implications for photocatalysis and photoelectric devices. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 4, 381–388. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.0c02729

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsia, C. F., Chang, C. H., and Huang, M. H. (2018). Unusually large lattice mismatch-induced optical behaviors of Au@Cu-Cu₂O core-shell nanocrystals with noncentrally located cores. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 35:1800112. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201800112

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, S.-C., Liu, S.-Y., Wang, H.-J., and Huang, M. H. (2015). Facet-dependent surface plasmon resonance properties of Au-Cu₂O core-shell nanocubes, octahedra, and rhombic dodecahedra. Small 11, 195–201. doi: 10.1002/smll.201401916

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, M. H., Rej, S., and Chiu, C.-Y. (2015). Facet-dependent optical properties revealed through investigation of polyhedral Au-Cu₂O and bimetallic core-shell nanocrystals. Small 11, 2716–2726. doi: 10.1002/smll.201403542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, D., Zhou, W., Zhong, X., Zhang, Y., and Li, X. (2014). Distinguishing localized surface plasmon resonance and schottky junction of Au-Cu₂O composites by their molecular spacer dependence. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 10958–10962. doi: 10.1021/am5023978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, Y., and Gao, X. (2009). Plasmonic fluorescent quantum dots. Nat. Nanotech. 4, 571–576. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.193

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jing, H.-Y., Wen, T., Fan, C.-M., Gao, G.-Q., Zhong, S.-L., and Xu, A.-W. (2014). Efficient adsorption/photodegradation of organic pollutants from aqueous systems using Cu₂O nanocrystals as a novel integrated photocatalytic adsorbent. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 14563–14570. doi: 10.1039/C4TA02459A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kamat, P. V., and Shanghavi, B. (1997). Interparticle electron transfer in metal/semiconductor composites. Picosecond dynamics of CdS-capped gold nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 7675–7679. doi: 10.1021/jp9709464

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koch, R., Li, G., Pandey, S., Phillpot, S., Wang, H., and Misture, S. T. (2019). Thermally induced transformations of Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanoparticles into Au-Cu nanoparticles from temperature-programmed in situ powder X-ray diffraction. J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 579–586. doi: 10.1107/S1600576719004497

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuo, C.-H., Yang, Y.-C., Gwo, S., and Huang, M. H. (2011). Facet-dependent and Au nanocrystal-enhanced electrical and photocatalytic properties of Au-Cu₂O core-shell heterostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1052–1057. doi: 10.1021/ja109182y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuo, M.-Y., Hsiao, C.-F., Chiu, Y.-H., Lai, T.-H., Fang, M.-J., Wu, J.-Y., et al. (2019). Au@Cu₂O core@shell nanocrystals as dual-functional catalysts for sustainable environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B 242, 499–506. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.075

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lai, S. C. S., and Koper, M. T. M. (2010). The influence of surface structure on selectivity in the ethanol electro-oxidation reaction on platinum. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 1122–1125. doi: 10.1021/jz100272f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, S. W., Hong, J. W., Lee, H., Wi, D. H., Kim, S., Han, S. W. H., et al. (2018). The surface plasmon-induced hot carrier effect on the catalytic activity of CO oxidation on a Cu₂O/hexoctahedral Au inverse catalyst. Nanoscale 10, 10835–10843. doi: 10.1039/C8NR00555A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, B., Jiang, M., Camargo, P. H. C., Cho, E. C., Tao, J., Lu, X., et al. (2010). Pd-pt bimetallic nanodendrites with high activity for oxygen reduction. Science 40, 1302–1305. doi: 10.1126/science.1170377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, D. Y., Ding, S. Y., Lin, H. X., Liu, B. J., Ye, Z. Z., Fan, F. R., et al. (2012). Distinctive enhanced and tunable plasmon resonant absorption from controllable Au@Cu₂O nanoparticles: experimental and theoretical modeling. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 4477–4483. doi: 10.1021/jp211565c

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, F., Li, W., Chen, W., Liu, D., and Li, P. (2019). An amperometric biosensor based on Cu₂O@Au nanocomposites for the detection of galectin-1 via lactose–galectin interactions. Nanotechnology 30:485706. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab3cde

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, B., Liu, A., Wu, H., Shen, Q., Zhao, T., and Wang, J. (2016). Hollow Au-Cu₂O core-shell nanoparticles with geometry-dependent optical properties as efficient plasmonic photocatalysts under visible light. Langmuir 32, 3085–3094. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00331

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Majhi, S. M., Rai, P., Raj, S., Chon, B.-S., Park, K.-K., and Yu, Y.-T. (2014). Effect of Au nanorods on potential barrier modulation in morphologically controlled Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanoreactors for gas sensor applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 7491–7497. doi: 10.1021/am5008694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meir, N., Jen-La Plante, I., Flomin, K., Chockler, E., Moshofsky, B., Diab, M., et al. (2013). Studying the chemical, optical and catalytic properties of noble metal (Pt, Pd, Ag, Au)–Cu₂O core–shell nanostructures grown via a general approach. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 1763–1769. doi: 10.1039/C2TA00721E

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niu, J., Dai, Y., Yin, L., Shang, J., and Crittenden, J. C. (2015). Photocatalytic reduction of triclosan on Au-Cu₂O nanowire arrays as plasmonic photocatalysts under visible light irradiation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 17421–17428. doi: 10.1039/C5CP02244D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oener, S. Z., Mann, S. A., Sciacca, B., Sfiligoj, C., Hoang, J., and Garnett, E. C. (2015). Au-Cu₂O core-shell nanowire photovoltaics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106:023501. doi: 10.1063/1.4905652

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pang, H., Gao, F., Chen, Q., Liu, R., and Lu, Q. (2012a). Dendrite-like Co3O4 nanostructure and its applications in sensors, supercapacitors and catalysis. Dalton Trans. 41:5862. doi: 10.1039/c2dt12494g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pang, M., Wang, Q., and Zeng, H. C. (2012b). Self-generated etchant for synthetic sculpturing of Cu₂O-Au, Cu₂O@Au, Au/Cu₂O, and 3D-Au nanostructures. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 14605–14609. doi: 10.1002/chem.201202765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rai, P., Khan, R., Raj, S., Majhi, S. M., Park, K.-K., Yu, Y.-T., et al. (2014). Au@Cu₂O core–shell nanoparticles as chemiresistors for gas sensor applications: effect of potential barrier modulation on the sensing performance. Nanoscale 6, 581–588. doi: 10.1039/C3NR04118B

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scott, K. D., Li, J., Meng, F., Senty, T. R., Suri, S., Zhi, M., et al. (2012). Photocatalytic activity enhanced by plasmonic resonant energy transfer from metal to semiconductor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15033–15041. doi: 10.1021/ja305603t

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, X., Ji, Y., Hou, S., Liu, W., Zhang, H., Wen, T., et al. (2015). Plasmon enhancement effect in Au Nanorods@Cu₂O core-shell nanostructures and their use in probing defect states. Langmuir 31, 1537–1546. doi: 10.1021/la503988e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, A. M., and Nie, S. (2010). Semiconductor nanocrystals: structure, properties, and band gap engineering. Acct. Chem. Res. 43, 190–200. doi: 10.1021/ar9001069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, Y., Guo, H., Wang, Z., Long, Y., Li, W., and Tu, Y. (2018). Au@Cu₂O core-shell structure for high sensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Sens. Actu. B 255, 2510–2519. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.09.056

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, W., Cao, B., Xiao, W., Zhang, M., Wang, S., Xie, S., et al. (2019). Electrochemical reduction of CO₂ on hollow cubic Cu₂O@Au nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14:63. doi: 10.1186/s11671-019-2892-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Li, R., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., Yan, X., Wu, X., et al. (2017). Novel Au/Cu₂O multi-shelled porous heterostructures for enhanced efficiency of photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 14415–14421. doi: 10.1039/C7TA02254A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H.-J., Yang, K.-H., Hsu, S.-C., and Huang, M. H. (2016a). Photothermal effects from Au-Cu₂O core-shell nanocubes, octahedra, and nanobars with broad near-infrared absorption tunability. Nanoscale 8, 965–972. doi: 10.1039/C5NR06847A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W.-C., Lyu, L.-M., and Huang, M. H. (2011). Investigation of the effects of polyhedral gold nanocrystal morphology and facets on the formation of Au–Cu₂O core–shell heterostructures. Chem. Mater. 23, 2677–2684. doi: 10.1021/cm200708q

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zheng, M., Liu, S., and Wang, Z. (2016b). Size control and growth process study of Au@Cu₂O particles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11:390. doi: 10.1186/s11671-016-1603-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y. Q., Nikitin, K., and Mccomb, D. W. (2008). Fabrication of Au-Cu₂O core-shell nanocube heterostructures. Chem. Phys. Lett. 456, 202–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.03.027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, X., Cai, J., Li, S., Zheng, F., Lai, Z., Zhu, L., et al. (2016). Au@Cu₂O stellated polytope with core-shelled nanostructure for high-performance adsorption and visible-light-driven photodegradation of cationic and anionic dyes. J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 469, 138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Xiang, J., Yang, C., Lu, W., and Lieber, C. M. (2004). Single-crystal metallic nanowires and metal/semiconductor nanowire heterostructures. Nature 430, 61–65. doi: 10.1038/nature02674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, K.-H., Hsu, S.-C., and Huang, M. H. (2016). Facet-dependent optical and photothermal properties of Au@Ag-Cu₂O core-shell nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 28, 5140–5146. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02187

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y.-C., Wang, H.-J., Whang, J., Huang, J.-S., Lyu, L.-M., Lin, P.-H., et al. (2014). Facet-dependent optical properties of polyhedral Au-Cu₂O core-shell nanocrystals. Nanoscale 6, 4316–4324. doi: 10.1039/c3nr06293g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, B.-B., Wang, Y.-H., Xu, S.-M., Chen, K., Yang, Y.-G., and Kong, Q.-H. (2020). Tuning nanocavities of Au@Cu₂O yolk–shell nanoparticles for highly selective electroreduction of CO₂ to ethanol at low potential. RSC Adv. 10, 19192–19198. doi: 10.1039/D0RA02482A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Yun, T., Lee, K., and Min, O. (2010). Nonepitaxial growth of hybrid core-shell nanostructures with large lattice mismatches. Science 327, 1634–1638. doi: 10.1126/science.1184769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Blom, D. A., and Wang, H. (2011). Au-Cu₂O core-shell nanoparticles: a hybrid metal-semiconductor heteronanostructure with geometrically tunable optical properties. Chem. Mater. 23, 4587–4598. doi: 10.1021/cm202078t

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Jiang, R., Guo, Y., Yang, B., Chen, X. L., Wang, J., et al. (2016a). Plasmon modes induced by anisotropic gap opening in Au@Cu₂O nanorods. Small 12, 4264–4276. doi: 10.1002/smll.201600065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Zhao, Q., Wang, X., Yan, X., Sheng, H., and Zeng, Z. (2016b). Highly active and stable Au@Cu_xO core–shell nanoparticles supported on alumina for carbon monoxide oxidation at low temperature. RSC Adv. 6, 75126–75132. doi: 10.1039/C6RA07358A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., Ma, Y., Jie, Z., Zhong, X., Jin, M., Li, Z. Y., et al. (2013a). Seed-mediated synthesis of single-crystal gold nanospheres with controlled diameters in the range 5–30 nm and their self-assembly upon dilution. Chem. Asian J. 8, 792–799. doi: 10.1002/asia.201201105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., Zeng, J., Ruditskiy, A., Liu, M., and Xia, Y. (2013b). Oxidative etching and its role in manipulating the nucleation and growth of noble-metal nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 26, 22–33. doi: 10.1021/cm402023g

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, S., Chen, X., Li, Z., Ye, X., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2020a). Cooperation between inside and outside of TiO₂: lattice Cu⁺ accelerates carrier migration to the surface of metal copper for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Appl. Catal. B 264:118515. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118515

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, S., Deng, D., Nguyen, M. T., Chau, Y.-T. R., Wen, C.-Y., and Yonezawa, T. (2020b). Synthesis of Au@Cu₂O core–shell nanoparticles with tunable shell thickness and their degradation mechanism in aqueous solutions. Langmuir 36, 3386–3392. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar