Nanogold Functionalized With Lipoamide-isoDGR: A Simple, Robust and Versatile Nanosystem for αvβ3-Integrin Targeting

Introduction

Colloidal gold is a well-tolerated nanomaterial currently exploited for several applications in the field of nanomedicine (Cai et al., 2008; Giljohann et al., 2010). For example, gold nanoparticles have been exploited for various cancer treatment modalities, including tumor photothermal ablation therapy, radiosensitization, tumor imaging, and drug delivery (Frederix et al., 2003; Anker et al., 2008; Cai et al., 2008; Jain et al., 2008; Murphy et al., 2008; Vines et al., 2019). In particular, recent studies have shown that gold nanoparticles can be used as nano-vectors for delivering cytokines to tumors and, consequently, for enhancing their therapeutic index, such as in the case of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) (Paciotti et al., 2004; Farma et al., 2007; Libutti et al., 2010; Powell et al., 2010; Shenoi et al., 2013; Koonce et al., 2015; Paciotti et al., 2016). In this setting, the improved activity of cytokines is likely dependent on a “passive” targeting mechanism owing to the presence of abnormally leaky vasculature in tumors, which leads to the so-called “enhanced permeability and retention (EPR)” effect of nanoparticles in neoplastic tissues (Matsumura and Maeda, 1986; Chithrani et al., 2006).

We have previously shown that peptides containing isoAsp-Gly-Arg (isoDGR), a tripeptide motif that recognizes the αvβ3 integrin overexpressed in tumor vessels and on different tumor cell types (Avraamides et al., 2008; Desgrosellier and Cheresh, 2010), can be exploited as ligands for targeted delivery of various compounds to tumors, including drugs, imaging compounds and nanoparticles (Curnis et al., 2008; Curnis et al., 2013; Corti et al., 2017; Nardelli et al., 2018). In particular, we have shown that a cyclic CGisoDGRG peptide (called iso1) coupled to human serum albumin (iso1-HSA) can be used for the functionalization of nanogold bearing TNF or interleukin-12 (IL12), to enable “active” targeted delivery of nanoparticles to the tumor vasculature (Curnis et al., 2013; Gasparri et al., 2019). Studies in tumor-bearing mice have shown that extremely low doses of these nanoparticles (iso1-HSA/Au/TNF and iso1-HSA/Au/IL12) can deliver pharmacologically active doses of cytokines to murine tumors, with no evidence of toxicity, whereas nanoparticles lacking isoDGR were inactive, in line with the hypothesis that isoDGR could indeed contribute to cytokine delivery through an “active” targeting mechanism.

Despite the promising results obtained with iso1-HSA/Au/TNF and iso1-HSA/Au/IL12 as anti-cancer agents, these formulations have important drawbacks related to the use of iso1-HSA for nanogold functionalization with isoDGR. First, this peptide-protein conjugate, which consists of albumin molecules with a variable number of linkers (6-7 linkers) and peptides (4-5 isoDGR peptides) per molecule (Curnis et al., 2013), leads to the formation of heterogeneous nanoparticles. Second, the HSA used to prepare iso1-HSA may consist of different albumin isoforms (Kragh-Hansen et al., 2013), thereby representing an additional source of molecular heterogeneity. Third, considering that HSA is purified from human plasma donors, the isoform composition of different lots may also vary. Thus, all these issues represent important drawbacks in using iso1-HSA as a reagent for nanogold functionalization, since they may have an impact on product manufacturing, analysis, lot-to-lot consistency, pharmacology, and toxicology.

To overcome these problems, we tested the feasibility of an alternative strategy for nanogold functionalization with isoDGR based on the use of a homogeneous and well-defined reagent, consisting of a peptide-polyethyleneglycol-lipoamide conjugate (iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA), instead of iso1-HSA. We show that gold nanoparticles functionalized with this compound maintain their αvβ3 recognition properties and are stable. Furthermore, we provide experimental evidence that these nanoparticles can be used as carriers for delivering TNF to tumors and to induce more efficient anti-tumor effects than nanoparticles lacking the isoDGR targeting moiety.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

Human serum albumin (HSA) (Baxter); human natural αvβ3 integrin (Immunological Science); anti-polyethyleneglycol (PEG) monoclonal antibody (mAb), clone 26A04 (Abcam); bovine serum albumin (BSA) fraction-V (Sigma); gold nanoparticles (25 nm, A_{520 nm} ∼1 unit/ml) (Aurion); MAL-dPEG₁₁-lipoamide (Mal-PEG₁₁-LPA) and MAL-dPEG₃-lipoamide (Mal-PEG₃-LPA) (Quanta Biodesign). Murine TNF was prepared as described previously (Curnis et al., 2013).

Peptide Synthesis and Characterization

Linear peptide CGisoDGRG was assembled using the Fmoc-based solid-phase method (Fields and Noble, 1990) on a 2-CTC resin. Upon synthesis, the peptide was cleaved from the resin, using 1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in dichloromethane, and dried. The resulting material was dissolved in N,N′-dimethylformamide (DMF, 50 mM) and treated with HBTU/DIEA (1 eq.) to obtain the fully protected cyclo-CGisoDGRG peptide. DMF was removed under vacuum and the resulting crude material was directly treated with TFA-based cleavage mixture (TFA 95%, TIS 2.5%, Thianisole 2.5%) to obtain the unprotected peptide, which was recovered by precipitation in cold diethyl ether. The peptide was purified by reverse-phase (RP)-HPLC, using a Shimpack GWS C18 column (10 µm, 21.2 mm x 250 mm, Shimadzu), lyophilized, and stored at −80°C. Aliquots of the product were dissolved in water and stored at −80°C until use. The identity and purity of the product, called iso1 (see Figure 1), were confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry [expected monoisotopic mass (MH⁺): 546.22 Da; found: 546.27 Da] and RP-HPLC analysis (purity > 95%).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Structure of compound 1, 2, 3 and 4. (A) Schematic representation of the CGisoDGRG head-to-tail cyclized peptide (iso1). (B) Structures of conjugates consisting of iso1 or Cys coupled with MAL-PEG₁₁-lipoamide or MAL-PEG₃-lipoamide to form iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA (compound 1), Cys-PEG₁₁-LPA, (compound 2), iso1-PEG₃-LPA (compound 3), Cys-PEG₃-LPA (compound 4), respectively.

Preparation of iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA, Cys-PEG₁₁-LPA, iso1-PEG₃-LPA, and Cys-PEG₃LPA Conjugates

Iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA was prepared by coupling iso1 to Mal-PEG₁₁-LPA using a 1:1.2 molar ratio, as follows: 4 mg of iso1 in 100 µl of 0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.8, were mixed with 50 µl of acetonitrile (final pH: ∼7). The resulting solution was chilled on ice and mixed with 7.7 mg of MAL-PEG₁₁-LPA in 100 µl of 50% acetonitrile and left to react under gentle shaking at room temperature. The coupling reaction was monitored by RP-HPLC and stopped when complete reagent conversion occurred. In parallel, a control conjugate was prepared using cysteine in place of iso1. Coupling reactions were monitored by RP-HPLC using a Shimpack GWS C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 mm x 150 mm, Shimadzu) connected to Shimadzu Prominence HPLC (mobile phase A, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water; mobile phase B, 70% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic; linear gradient 10–100% B; in 20 min; flow rate, 1 ml/min). The final products were purified by RP-HPLC using a Jupiter C18 column (10 µm, 21.2 mm x 250 mm, Phenomenex), and the same mobile phases indicated above (liner gradient, 0–90% B, 45 min; flow rate, 14 ml/min). The products were lyophilized, resuspended in water, and stored at −20°C. Furthermore, iso1 and Cys were also coupled to MAL-dPEG₃-LPA, i.e., a compound with a shorter PEG chain, using the same procedures. The identity of each conjugate [iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA (compound 1), Cys-PEG₁₁-LPA (compound 2), iso1-PEG₃-LPA (compound 3), and Cys-PEG₃LPA (compound 4)] was checked by mass spectrometry analysis using an LTQ-XL Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fischer) (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1).

Nanogold Functionalization With Compound 1

To functionalize gold nanoparticles with iso1 we mixed aliquots of colloidal gold (1 ml, adjusted to pH ∼7.5 with sodium hydroxide) with 4–32 µg of compound 1 in 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (100 µl). The mixture (final pH ∼7.5) was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. To saturate gold nanoparticles, we then added 0.5% HSA (in 25 µl aliquots every 2 min, for four times) and left to incubate for 10 min at room temperature. The product was then centrifuged at 13,000x g for 15 min. The pellets were resuspended in 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.33, containing 0.05% HSA (buffer A). The centrifugation/washing steps were repeated twice. The final product (called 1-Au) was resuspended with 1 ml of buffer A and stored at 4°C.

Nanogold Functionalization With Compound 1 and TNF

Bifunctional gold NPs bearing compound 1 and TNF (called 1-Au/TNF) were prepared as follows: a solution containing 0.540 mg of compound 1 and 2.88 mg of TNF in 18 ml of 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, was slowly added (1 ml/min) to 180 ml of 25 nm-nanogold, with pH adjusted to ∼7.5 with sodium hydroxide, and left to incubate for 40 min at room temperature under shaking. The product was mixed with 18 ml of 0.5% HSA in water (slowly added) and left to incubate for an additional 15 min, to saturate gold NPs. The mixture was centrifuged (13,000x g for 30 min) and resuspended in buffer A (three times). The pellet was then resuspended with 1.8 ml of buffer A, filtered (0.22 µm pore size, Millex-GV Filter), and stored at −80°C. Control nanoparticles bearing compound 2 and TNF (called 2-Au/TNF) were prepared following the above procedure, except that in this case, 0.360 mg of compound 2 was used.

Physicochemical Characterization of Nanoparticles

Absorption spectra of coated- or uncoated-NPs were recorded using an UltroSpec 2100 spectrophotometer (Amersham Biosciences), a 1 cm path-length quartz cuvette, and buffer A or 5 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0, respectively, as blanks. The concentration of coated-NPs was calculated by interpolating the absorbance values at 530 nm on a calibration curve obtained using uncoated nanogold (stock solution: 3.3 × 10¹¹ NPs/ml, A₅₃₀ nm: 0.96 U/ml).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed using a TALOS L120C microscope (ThermoScientific) as described previously (Gasparri et al., 2019). Morphometric analysis of nanoparticle’s shape and diameter was performed using the ImageJ software, essentially as previously reported (Rice et al., 2013).

Binding of Nanogold Functionalized With Compound 1 or 2 to Melanoma Cells

Human MSR3 melanoma cells were grown in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) (Lonza) supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were seeded into a 96-well plate (20,000 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h in complete cell culture medium. After medium removal, the cells were incubated with nanogold functionalized with compound 1 or 2 in cell culture medium (1.7 × 10¹¹ NPs/ml, 100 µl/well, 1.5 h at 37°C, 5% CO₂). After washing, the cells were further incubated for 4 h at 37°C, 5% CO₂, and then photographed using a bright field microscopy.

αvβ3 Integrin and Anti-PEG Antibody Binding Assays

The bifunctional properties of 1-Au/TNF were checked using two sandwich assays based on αvβ3-and anti-PEG antibody-coated plates followed by an anti-TNF polyclonal antibody. The αvβ3/anti-TNF polyclonal antibody sandwich assay was performed essentially as described (Gasparri et al., 2019). Briefly, various amounts of nanoparticles in 25 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 1 mM manganese chloride, 1% w/v BSA (binding buffer), were added to microtiter plates coated with or without αvβ3 (0.5–1 µg/ml). The binding of nanoparticles was then detected using a rabbit anti-TNF polyclonal antiserum (1:1,000), followed by a polyclonal goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugate. Bound peroxidase was detected by adding the o-phenylenediamine chromogenic substrate. The anti-PEG antibody/anti-TNF polyclonal antibody sandwich assay was carried out essentially as described above using a microtiter plate coated without or with an anti-PEG mAb (5 µg/ml) in the capture step, and the anti-TNF polyclonal antibody in the detection step.

In Vitro TNF Bioassay

The amount of bioactive TNF bound to gold NPs was determined using an in vitro bioassay based on TNF-induced cytolysis of murine L-M fibroblasts, as described (Curnis et al., 2013), except that cell viability was quantified using the PrestoBlue Cell Viability (Invitrogen). International murine TNF reference standard (NIBSC, ID: 88/532) was used to calibrate the assay.

In Vivo Studies

All procedures on mice were approved by the San Raffaele Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, according to institutional guidelines, and in compliance with national (D.L. N.26, 04/03/2014) and international law and policies (new directive 2010/63/EU). Murine WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma cells (ATCC, cat. CRL-1751) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 50 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.25 μg/ml amphotericin-B. WEHI-164 cells were tested for mycoplasma contamination using the Mycoplasmacheck testing service provided by Eurofins Genomics before their use in vivo. BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old, Charles River Laboratories), weighing 18–20 g, were challenged with subcutaneous injection in the left flank with 1.5 × 10⁶ WEHI-164 cells. Six days later, mice were injected (i.v.) with nanodrugs in 0.9% sodium chloride. Tumor growth was monitored by measuring the tumor size with a caliper. Tumor volumes were estimated by calculating r1 × r2 × r3 × 4/3π, where r1 and r2 are the longitudinal and lateral radii, and r3 is the thickness of the tumor protruding from the surface of normal skin. Animals were sacrificed before tumors reached a volume of 1 cm³. Tumor sizes are shown as mean ± SE.

Results

Preparation of iso1-PEG-LPA Conjugates

To have at hand an isoDGR peptide that can be directly attached to gold nanoparticles, we have coupled cyclo-CGisoDGRG (iso1) to MAL-PEG₁₁-lipoamide and MAL-PEG₃-lipoamide, two cross-linking reagents with different polyethylene glycol chains (Figure 1). Both reagents contain a maleimide group (MAL), which can form a thioether bond with the sulfhydryl group of iso1, and a lipoamide group that can react with nanogold to form dative bonds. In parallel, we prepared control ligands consisting of cysteine in place of iso1. These conjugates, called iso1-PEG₁₁-LAP (compound1), Cys-PEG₁₁-LAP (compound2), iso1-PEG₃-LAP (compound3), and Cys-PEG₃-LAP (compound4), were purified by RP-HPLC. The identity of each product was confirmed by mass spectrometry analysis (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1).

Identification of the Optimal iso1-PEG-LPA Compound for Nanogold Functionalization

To functionalize nanogold with isoDGR, we then mixed 25 nm-gold nanoparticles with various concentrations of compound 1 or 3 and left them to incubate for 2 h. We observed nanogold aggregation with compound 3 at concentrations > 4 µg/ml, as indicated by a marked change of nanogold color, but not with compound 1 (Figures 2A,B, upper panels). Although compound 3 did not cause nanogold aggregation at concentrations < 4 µg/ml, this compound was unable to inhibit the aggregation induced by the addition of 5% (w/v) NaCl (Figure 2A, lower panels). This indicates that compound 3 loaded on gold nanoparticles was not sufficient to inhibit salt-induced aggregation. In contrast, all the tested doses of compound 1 (4–32 µg/ml) did not cause nanogold aggregation by itself and could efficiently protect nanoparticles from salt-induced aggregation (Figure 2B, lower panels). Based on this finding, nanogold functionalized with compound 1 and its relevant control (compound 2, lacking the iso1) were selected for further studies, whereas nanogold functionalized with compounds 3 and 4 were not further investigated. Nanoparticles prepared with compound 1 were further stabilized with human serum albumin and characterized by UV-Vis spectrophotometric analysis. The results showed that these nanoparticles were homogeneous, not aggregated, and resistant to salt-induced aggregation (Figures 2C,D).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Compound 1 protects nanogold from aggregation better than compound 3. (A, B) Representative photographs of nanogold (25-nm, ∼1 U/ml at A₅₂₀ nm) mixed with the indicated amount of compound 3 or 1 before and after the addition of sodium chloride (5% final). Marked color change from red to gray is an indication of nanoparticle aggregation. (C) UV-Vis spectra of gold nanoparticles uncoated (dashed line) or coated (solid red line) with the indicated amounts of compound 1 and human serum albumin (HSA, added as a second stabilizer). (D) Effect of sodium chloride (5% final concentration) on aliquots of the products shown in (C). Note that all products display similar colors, suggesting good nanoparticle stability.

Binding of Gold Nanoparticles Functionalized With Compound 1 (1-Au) or 2 (2-Au) to MSR3 Cells

To assess whether nanogold functionalized with compound 1 (called 1-Au) could bind membrane-associated αvβ3, we tested the binding of this product to MSR3 cells, a human melanoma cell line that expresses high levels of αvβ3 and previously used for the characterization of iso1 (Nardelli et al., 2018). In parallel, control nanogold functionalized with compound 2 (2-Au) was also tested. Phase-contrast microscopy experiments showed granular dot-like staining in MRS cells incubated with 1-Au, but little, or not at all, with 2-Au (Figure 3), suggesting that the binding of 1-Au was mediated by iso1. These data are in line with the hypothesis that 1-Au can recognize the αvβ3 integrin expressed on the cell surface.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Binding of gold nanoparticles functionalized with compound 1 (1-Au) or compound 2 (2-Au) to MSR3 cells. Phase-contrast microscopic images of MSR3 cells after incubation with or without 1-Au or 2-Au. 1-Au and 2-Au were prepared using 4 µg/ml of each compound per ml of gold sol. Arrows indicate black dots corresponding to nanoparticle agglomerates bound to cells. Magnification, 40X.

Preparation and Characterization of 1-Au/TNF

To demonstrate that compound 1 can be exploited for delivering nanogold to αvβ3-positive tumors, we coated gold NPs with compound 1 and murine TNF, a cytokine endowed with potent anti-tumor activity. Optimal nanogold loading with cytokine and ligand was achieved with 16 µg/ml of TNF and 3–4 µg/ml of compound 1 or 2–4 µg/ml of compound 2 (Supplementary Figures S2–S4 and see also Supplementary Material). Based on these results, we prepared a larger batch of bifunctional nanoparticles functionalized with isoDGR and TNF using 16 µg/ml of TNF and 3 µg/ml of compound 1 (1-Au/TNF), a larger batch of control nanoparticles lacking isoDGR using 16 µg/ml of TNF and 2 µg/ml of compound 2 (2-Au/TNF).

UV-Vis spectrophotometric analysis of both products showed single absorption peaks at 530 nm with a similar width, indicating that both products contained low (undetectable) amounts of aggregates (Figure 4A and Table 1). Transmission electron microscopy showed that both nanodrugs had a maximal diameter of about 28 nm and were composed by spherical nanoparticles (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Characterization of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF nanoparticles. (A) UV-Vis absorption spectra of nanogolds. The dotted line corresponds to uncoated 25 nm gold nanoparticles. (B) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF. Representative microphotographs of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF are shown. Morphometric analysis of nanoparticles shows that 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF consist of gold nanospheres with maximal diameters of 25.6 ± 2.3 nm and 26.7 ± 2.2 nm (mean ± SD, n = 100 NPs), respectively, and with a roundness value of 0.87 ± 0.07 and 0.090 ± 0.05, respectively (a roundness value of 1 corresponds to a perfect circle). (C) Binding of nanoparticles to microtiter plates coated with (+) or without (–) an anti-PEG mAb or αvβ3 integrin, as detected with an anti-TNF polyclonal antibody and HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit antiserum. The results of a representative experiment are shown. Bars, mean ± SE of technical duplicate.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Characterization of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF by UV-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis) and cytotoxicity assays.

To assess the presence of compound 1 or 2 and TNF on the two nanodrugs, we measured the capability of each product to form molecular sandwiches with an anti-PEG monoclonal antibody (mAb) and an anti-TNF polyclonal antibody (pAb), or with αvβ3 and anti-TNF pAb. To this aim, we performed assays based on the use of microtiter plates coated with anti-PEG mAb or αvβ3 in the capture step and anti-TNF pAb in the detection step (see Figure 4Cfor a schematic representation of the assays). 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF showed comparable binding properties when anti-PEG mAb-coated plates were used (Figure 4C, left panel), suggesting that these nanodrugs were loaded with similar amounts of PEG-containing ligands and TNF. In contrast, only 1-Au/TNF was detected when αvβ3 was used in place of anti-PEG mAb in the capture step, as expected (Figure 4C, right panel). Of note NPs functionalized with compound 3 (a ligand characterized by a shorter PEG length) and stabilized with TNF to prevent aggregation (3-Au/TNF) bound αvβ3 less efficiently than 1-Au/TNF (Supplementary Figure S5), suggesting that the PEG₁₁ chain of 1-Au/TNF is important for the nanodrug/αvβ3 interaction.

To quantify the amount of bioactive TNF loaded onto both nanodrugs, we then tested their cytotoxic effects against murine L-M fibroblasts, using TNF as a reference standard. Based on the biological effects observed, we estimate that the potency of each nanoparticle of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF was equivalent to ∼11 and ∼14 TNF molecules, respectively (Table 1), suggesting that both conjugates were loaded with similar amounts of bioactive TNF. Overall, these and the above results suggest that the functionalization of nanogold with lipoamide-isoDGR peptide and TNF is feasible.

Stability of 1-Au/TNF

The stability of 1-Au/TNF in the storage buffer (5 mM phosphate buffer containing 0.05% HSA) was then investigated. To this aim, 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF were left to incubate at 4°C or 37°C for various times (from 1 to 27 days) and then analyzed using the anti-PEG mAb/anti-TNF pAb and αvβ3/anti-TNF pAb sandwich assays. No significant changes occurred upon nanodrug storage for 9 days at 4°C or 3 days at 37°C (Figure 5A). In contrast, both products showed a progressive decline in their binding properties upon storage at 37°C for longer times (Figure 5A). Furthermore, no change in the biological activity of both nanodrugs was observed upon storage up to 3 days at 4°C (Figure 5B). These results suggest that nanogold functionalized with TNF and iso1 (the latter via lipoamide) can be stored at 4°C for at least 27 days without loss of function. Furthermore, no significant changes occurred upon nanodrug storage for > 1 year at –80°C (Supplementary Figure S6).

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. Stability studies of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF. 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF, in storage buffer (5 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.33, 0.05% HSA), were left to incubate at 4°C or 37°C for the indicated time and tested using the assays indicated on each panel. (A) Binding of nanodrugs to microtiter plates coated with an anti-PEG mAb (left panels) or αvβ3 (right panel), as detected with a polyclonal antibody anti-TNF followed by HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit antiserum (see Figure 4, for a schematic representation of the sandwich assays). Bars, mean ± SE of technical duplicate. (B) Cytotoxic effects of nanodrugs on L-M cells. L-M cells (30,000 cells/well) were cultured in complete medium supplemented with 2 µg/ml actinomycin D and in the presence of various amounts of nanodrugs, for 20 h at 37°C, 5% CO₂. Cell viability was quantified using the PrestoBlue cell viability reagent.

Release of TNF From 1-Au/TNF in Cell Culture Medium

The stability of nanodrugs in DMEM cell culture medium, i.e., in conditions used in in vitro cytotoxicity assays, was also investigated. To this aim, 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF were centrifuged, resuspended in DMEM containing 0.5 mg/ml HSA, and left to incubate at 37°C for 1 and 2 days. The amount of bioactive TNF released in the supernatant was measured, after further NPs centrifugation, by cytotoxicity assays. The results show that about 50 and 80% of the bioactive TNF bound to NPs was released from 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF, respectively, after 1 day of incubation (Figure 6), suggesting that DMEM promoted the release of biologically active TNF. Considering that 2-Au/TNF was loaded with 2-fold more TNF compared to 1-Au/TNF (see Table 1), one possible explanation for the higher release of TNF by 2-Au/TNF is that TNF subunits can bind to NPs in different manners depending on the molecular density on the nanogold surface. However, when the same experiment was performed with NPs in the storage buffer instead of DMEM, we observed that only a very small fraction of TNF was released from NPs in both cases (Figure 6), suggesting that in these conditions most TNF molecules remain firmly bound.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. Release of biologically active TNF from 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF upon incubation in cell culture medium. Aliquots of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF (1-3x10¹¹ NPs/ml, 100 µl) were centrifuged, resuspended in 5 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.33, containing 0.5 mg/ml HSA (storage buffer) or in DMEM containing 0.5 mg/ml HSA and left to incubate at 37°C for the indicated time. After centrifugation, the supernatants were collected. The amount of bioactive TNF released in the supernatant at various time points was then measured using a cytotoxicity assay based on L-M cells. Bars represent the concentration of bioactive TNF found in the supernatant (mean ± SEM, of 4 technical replicates); the dashed lines represent the concentration of total TNF (bound and released).

The higher release of TNF observed in DMEM suggests that part of TNF was likely released also during the cytotoxicity assays of nanodrugs, thereby contributing to their cytotoxic activity reported in Table 1.

Anti-Tumor Activity of 1- and 2-Au/TNF

Finally, we analyzed the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF using nanodrug doses equivalent to 3 µg of bioactive TNF, administered intravenously to immunocompetent mice bearing subcutaneous WEHI-164 fibrosarcomas. Three out of six mice (50%) were cured with 1-Au/TNF, whereas only one out of six mice (17%) was cured with 2-Au/TNF (Figures 7A,B), suggesting that iso1 increased the antitumor activity to TNF-bearing nanogold. To assess the toxicity of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF, we measured the loss of body weight after treatment. Notably, 1-Au/TNF induced a lower loss of weight than 2-Au/TNF (Figure 7C, Supplementary Figure S7), suggesting that iso1 increased the therapeutic index (i.e., the ratio between efficacy and toxicity) of TNF-bearing nanogold, at least as judged from the loss of animal body weight.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7. Anti-tumor effects of 1-Au/TNF and 2-Au/TNF in the WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma model. Tumor-bearing mice were treated at day 6 after tumor implantation with 1-Au/TNF or 2-Au/TNF doses equivalent to 3 µg of bioactive TNF (by L-M cytolytic assay). Nanodrugs were administered i.v. in 0.9% sodium chloride. Control mice were treated i.v. with 0.9% sodium chloride (Diluent). Tumor growth in each mouse (A) and cumulative data (B) are shown (mean ± SE, six mice per group). ***, p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 unpaired two-tail t test at day 17. (C) Animal body weight change after treatment (mean ± SE, six mice per group). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001 ordinary one–way ANOVA of the area under the curve for each mouse weight (see Supplementary Figure S7) calculated from day 6 to day 13 with the GraphPad Prism software.

Discussion

In this study we have designed, produced and preclinically evaluated a new reagent for nanogold functionalization with the isoDGR motif, called iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA. This reagent consists of head-to-tail cyclized CGisoDGRG peptide (iso1) chemically coupled via its thiol group to maleimide-PEG₁₁-LPA cross-linking reagent. Remarkably, the coupling reaction leads to the formation of a succinimide ring between peptide and PEG₁₁-LPA (see Figure 1). This succinimide linker is important for the functional properties of iso1, as in previous studies we have shown that iso1-HSA, a peptide-protein conjugate previously used for the functionalization of nanogold with iso1, contains a succinimide ring that is crucial for αvβ3 recognition (Nardelli et al., 2018). In particular, we have shown that this conjugate, produced by coupling iso1 to human serum albumin using sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (sulfo-SMCC) as cross-linking reagent, has a higher affinity and selectivity for αvβ3 than iso1 alone, thanks to the presence of the succinimide ring (Nardelli et al., 2018). NMR, computational, and biochemical studies have shown that the succinimide ring of the linker participates in αvβ3 binding through the formation of a hydrogen bond with the Tyr122β3 side chain of αvβ3 (Nardelli et al., 2018). Although the succinimide ring of the linker in iso1-HSA contributes to stabilizing the interactions of iso1 with αvβ3, we have to consider that the sulfo-SMCC cross-linking reagent used for coupling iso1 to HSA can react with different amino-groups of albumin, thereby leading to conjugate molecules bearing a variable number of linkers and peptides in different positions. Consequently, the use iso1-HSA for nanogold functionalization leads to heterogeneous nanoparticles. In contrast, iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA is a homogeneous reagent (expected mass:1428.61 Da; found mass 1428.62 Da) that can react via lipoamide with nanogold to form a stable gold-thiol bond (Katz and Willner, 2004) and maintains the succinimide ring as a linker between iso1 and PEG₁₁-LPA. We think, therefore, that iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA is a good candidate for replacing iso1-HSA for nanogold functionalization with isoDGR and for the preparation of more homogeneous nanodrugs.

This view is supported by the results of in vitro binding experiments showing that iso1, after coupling to nanogold via iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA (herein called 1-Au), maintained its capability to bind purified αvβ3 and to recognize MRS melanoma cells, an αvβ3-expressing cell line previously used for the characterization of isoDGR-containing compounds (Nardelli et al., 2018; Paladino et al., 2019). Gold nanoparticles functionalized with iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA can also be loaded with ∼11 molecules/NP of biologically active TNF, demonstrating that this strategy is also suitable for preparing bi-functional nanodrugs (called 1-Au/TNF) bearing both targeting and effector moieties.

Drug stability studies have shown that these bi-functional nanodrugs can be stored up to three days at 37°C, or >1 year at 80°C, in 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.33, containing 0.05% HSA, with no loss of activity in terms of αvβ3-binding and TNF-cytolytic activity. This result indicates that the new strategy used for nanogold functionalization herein described allows the production of stable nanodrugs.

The results of in vivo studies, performed using WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma-bearing mice, show that nanoparticles functionalized with iso1 and TNF according to this strategy (1-Au/TNF) could induce tumor eradication in WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma-bearing mice more efficiently than nanoparticles lacking the iso1 targeting moiety (2-Au/TNF). This result supports the hypothesis of an active targeting mechanism mediated by iso1 in the case of 1-Au/TNF. Given that WEHI-164 cells do not express αvβ3 receptors, these results also suggest that the improved anti-tumor activity of 1-Au/TNF was mediated by targeted delivery of TNF to a tumor stroma component, likely to αvβ3-positive endothelial cells. Notably, the iso1-mediated targeting mechanism increased the anti-tumor activity of TNF without increasing its toxicity, as judged from the even lower loss of body weight caused by 1-Au/TNF compared to 2-Au/TNF. This suggests that the targeted delivery of TNF-nanogold to tumors with iso1 can increase its therapeutic index.

In conclusion, iso1-PEG₁₁-LPA is an efficient, well-defined, and robust reagent that can be used for nanogold functionalization with isoDGR and for enabling αvβ3 recognition by cytokine-bearing gold nanoparticles. This novel peptide-linker conjugate can overcome the need to use heterogeneous peptide-albumin conjugates, previously used for coupling the targeting peptide to nanogold (Curnis et al., 2013). The same approach can be exploited, in principle, for the preparation of other nanodrugs with different peptide ligands and different effector cytokines (e.g., IL12). This approach, besides reducing drug complexity, heterogeneity, and potential immunogenicity, may also reduce production costs, thereby facilitating nanodrug characterization and development.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by San Raffaele Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Italian Ministry of Health.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: AC and FC. Development of methodology: AMG, AS, AG, FC, and AC. Acquisition of data: AMG, AS, BC, GA, MM, and AG. Analysis and interpretation of data: AMG, AS, FC, and AC. Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: AC and FC. Administrative, technical, or material support: AMG, AS, BC and GA, and MM. Study supervision: AC and FC.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministero della Salute of Italy (RF-2016-02361054, FC) and by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC, grant IG-23470, AC) and Fondazione AIRC under five per Mille 2019 (ID. 22737 program, P.I. Maria Chiara Bonini, Group leader, AC).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer UP declared a past co-authorship with the authors AC, FC to the handling Editor.

Acknowledgments

We thank Annapaola Andolfo (Proteomic and Metabolomic Facility of the San Raffaele Institute) for mass spectrometry analysis and Maria Carla Panzeri (Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy BioImaging Center, ALEMBIC, San Raffaele Scientific Institute) for TEM analysis.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.690357/full#supplementary-material

References

Anker, J. N., Hall, W. P., Lyandres, O., Shah, N. C., Zhao, J., and Van Duyne, R. P. (2008). Biosensing with Plasmonic Nanosensors. Nat. Mater 7, 442–453. doi:10.1038/nmat2162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Avraamides, C. J., Garmy-Susini, B., and Varner, J. A. (2008). Integrins in Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 604–617. doi:10.1038/nrc2353

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, W., Gao, T., Hong, H., and Sun, J. (2008). Applications of Gold Nanoparticles in Cancer Nanotechnology. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 1, 17–32. doi:10.2147/nsa.s3788

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chithrani, B. D., Ghazani, A. A., and Chan, W. C. W. (2006). Determining the Size and Shape Dependence of Gold Nanoparticle Uptake into Mammalian Cells. Nano Lett. 6, 662–668. doi:10.1021/nl052396o

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corti, A., Gasparri, A. M., Ghitti, M., Sacchi, A., Sudati, F., Fiocchi, M., et al. (2017). Glycine N-Methylation in NGR-Tagged Nanocarriers Prevents Isoaspartate Formation and Integrin Binding without Impairing CD13 Recognition and Tumor Homing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1701245. doi:10.1002/adfm.201701245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Curnis, F., Sacchi, A., Gasparri, A., Longhi, R., Bachi, A., Doglioni, C., et al. (2008). Isoaspartate-glycine-arginine: A New Tumor Vasculature-Targeting Motif. Cancer Res. 68, 7073–7082. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Curnis, F., Sacchi, A., Longhi, R., Colombo, B., Gasparri, A., and Corti, A. (2013). IsoDGR-Tagged Albumin: A New αvβ3 Selective Carrier for Nanodrug Delivery to Tumors. Small 9, 673–678. doi:10.1002/smll.201202310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Desgrosellier, J. S., and Cheresh, D. A. (2010). Integrins in Cancer: Biological Implications and Therapeutic Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 9–22. doi:10.1038/nrc2748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farma, J. M., Puhlmann, M., Soriano, P. A., Cox, D., Paciotti, G. F., Tamarkin, L., et al. (2007). Direct Evidence for Rapid and Selective Induction of Tumor Neovascular Permeability by Tumor Necrosis Factor and a Novel Derivative, Colloidal Gold Bound Tumor Necrosis Factor. Int. J. Cancer 120, 2474–2480. doi:10.1002/ijc.22270

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fields, G. B., and Noble, R. L. (1990). Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis Utilizing 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl Amino Acids. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 35, 161–214. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3011.1990.tb00939.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frederix, F., Friedt, J.-M., Choi, K.-H., Laureyn, W., Campitelli, A., Mondelaers, D., et al. (2003). Biosensing Based on Light Absorption of Nanoscaled Gold and Silver Particles. Anal. Chem. 75, 6894–6900. doi:10.1021/ac0346609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gasparri, A. M., Sacchi, A., Basso, V., Cortesi, F., Freschi, M., Rrapaj, E., et al. (2019). Boosting Interleukin-12 Antitumor Activity and Synergism with Immunotherapy by Targeted Delivery with isoDGR-Tagged Nanogold. Small 15, e1903462. doi:10.1002/smll.201903462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giljohann, D. A., Seferos, D. S., Daniel, W. L., Massich, M. D., Patel, P. C., and Mirkin, C. A. (2010). Gold Nanoparticles for Biology and Medicine. Angew. Chem. Int. Edition 49, 3280–3294. doi:10.1002/anie.200904359

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jain, P. K., Huang, X., El-Sayed, I. H., and El-Sayed, M. A. (2008). Noble Metals on the Nanoscale: Optical and Photothermal Properties and Some Applications in Imaging, Sensing, Biology, and Medicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1578–1586. doi:10.1021/ar7002804

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katz, E., and Willner, I. (2004). Integrated Nanoparticle-Biomolecule Hybrid Systems: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6042–6108. doi:10.1002/anie.200400651

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koonce, N. A., Quick, C. M., Hardee, M. E., Jamshidi-Parsian, A., Dent, J. A., Paciotti, G. F., et al. (2015). Combination of Gold Nanoparticle-Conjugated Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Radiation Therapy Results in a Synergistic Antitumor Response in Murine Carcinoma Models. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. *Biol. *Phys. 93, 588–596. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kragh-Hansen, U., Minchiotti, L., Galliano, M., and Peters, T. (2013). Human Serum Albumin Isoforms: Genetic and Molecular Aspects and Functional Consequences. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Gen. Subjects 1830, 5405–5417. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Libutti, S. K., Paciotti, G. F., Byrnes, A. A., Alexander, H. R., Gannon, W. E., Walker, M., et al. (2010). Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Studies of CYT-6091, a Novel PEGylated Colloidal Gold-rhTNF Nanomedicine. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 6139–6149. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-0978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matsumura, Y., and Maeda, H. (1986). A New Concept for Macromolecular Therapeutics in Cancer Chemotherapy: Mechanism of Tumoritropic Accumulation of Proteins and the Antitumor Agent Smancs. Cancer Res. 46, 6387–6392.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Murphy, C. J., Gole, A. M., Stone, J. W., Sisco, P. N., Alkilany, A. M., Goldsmith, E. C., et al. (2008). Gold Nanoparticles in Biology: beyond Toxicity to Cellular Imaging. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1721–1730. doi:10.1021/ar800035u

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nardelli, F., Paissoni, C., Quilici, G., Gori, A., Traversari, C., Valentinis, B., et al. (2018). Succinimide-Based Conjugates Improve IsoDGR Cyclopeptide Affinity to αvβ3 without Promoting Integrin Allosteric Activation. J. Med. Chem. 61, 7474–7485. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00745

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paciotti, G. F., Myer, L., Weinreich, D., Goia, D., Pavel, N., Mclaughlin, R. E., et al. (2004). Colloidal Gold: a Novel Nanoparticle Vector for Tumor Directed Drug Delivery. Drug Deliv. 11, 169–183. doi:10.1080/10717540490433895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paciotti, G. F., Zhao, J., Cao, S., Brodie, P. J., Tamarkin, L., Huhta, M., et al. (2016). Synthesis and Evaluation of Paclitaxel-Loaded Gold Nanoparticles for Tumor-Targeted Drug Delivery. Bioconjug. Chem. 27, 2646–2657. doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paladino, A., Civera, M., Curnis, F., Paolillo, M., Gennari, C., Piarulli, U., et al. (2019). The Importance of Detail: How Differences in Ligand Structures Determine Distinct Functional Responses in Integrin α V β 3. Chem. Eur. J. 25, 5959–5970. doi:10.1002/chem.201900169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Powell, A. C., Paciotti, G. F., and Libutti, S. K. (2010). Colloidal Gold: a Novel Nanoparticle for Targeted Cancer Therapeutics. Methods Mol. Biol. 624, 375–384. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-609-2_25

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rice, S. B., Chan, C., Brown, S. C., Eschbach, P., Han, L., Ensor, D. S., et al. (2013). Particle Size Distributions by Transmission Electron Microscopy: an Interlaboratory Comparison Case Study. Metrologia 50, 663–678. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shenoi, M. M., Iltis, I., Choi, J., Koonce, N. A., Metzger, G. J., Griffin, R. J., et al. (2013). Nanoparticle Delivered Vascular Disrupting Agents (VDAs): Use of TNF-Alpha Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles for Multimodal Cancer Therapy. Mol. Pharmaceutics 10, 1683–1694. doi:10.1021/mp300505w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vines, J. B., Yoon, J. H., Ryu, N. E., Lim, D. J., and Park, H. (2019). Gold Nanoparticles for Photothermal Cancer Therapy. Front. Chem. 7, 167. doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar