Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Chem., 10 June 2021
Sec. Chemical Physics and Physical Chemistry
Volume 9 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.699387

Crystallization Control of N,N′-Dioctyl Perylene Diimide by Amphiphilic Block Copolymers Containing poly(3-Hexylthiophene) and Polyethylene Glycol

www.frontiersin.orgXiaohui Yang1 www.frontiersin.orgWanlong Lu2 www.frontiersin.orgJingning Cao1 www.frontiersin.orgChenyang Zhai1 www.frontiersin.orgWeili Li3 www.frontiersin.orgFangwen Zha1 www.frontiersin.orgGuanghao Lu2 www.frontiersin.orgHongkun Tian3 www.frontiersin.orgDemei Yu1 www.frontiersin.orgLaju Bu1*
  • 1School of Chemistry, MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, and Xi’an Key Laboratory of Sustainable Energy Material Chemistry, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
  • 2Frontier Institute of Science and Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China

The preparation of micron- to nanometer-sized functional materials with well-defined shapes and packing is a key process to their applications. There are many ways to control the crystal growth of organic semiconductors. Adding polymer additives has been proven a robust strategy to optimize semiconductor crystal structure and the corresponding optoelectronic properties. We have found that poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) can effectively regulate the crystallization behavior of N,N′-dioctyl perylene diimide (C8PDI). In this study, we combined P3HT and polyethylene glycol (PEG) to amphiphilic block copolymers and studied the crystallization modification effect of these block copolymers. It is found that the crystallization modification effect of the block copolymers is retained and gradually enhanced with P3HT content. The length of C8PDI crystals were well controlled from 2 to 0.4 μm, and the width from 210 to 35 nm. On the other hand, due to the water solubility of PEG block, crystalline PEG-b-P3HT/C8PDI micelles in water were successfully prepared, and this water phase colloid could be stable for more than 2 weeks, which provides a new way to prepare pollution-free aqueous organic semiconductor inks for printing electronic devices.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACTS
www.frontiersin.org

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACTS

Introduction

The preparation of micron- and nanometer-sized functional materials with well-defined shapes and sizes has broad applications in catalysis, electronics, medicine and other fields. Controlling the crystal morphology of organic semiconductors has always been a research focus due to their morphology impact on the optoelectronic properties. The existing methods for controlling the growth of crystals include melting techniques, vapor techniques, solution-processing, chemical reaction and patterning (He et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2018). Solution-processing methods include recrystallization, dip coating, drop casting, solvent exchange, solvent vapor diffusion, etc (Diao et al., 2014). In the solution-processing method, the growth of the crystals is closely related to factors such as solvent, solubility, concentration, temperature, pressure, etc (Wang et al., 2018). Therefore, through adding solvent additives to the semiconductor solution, thermal annealing or solvent annealing of the semiconductor film, polar solvent treatment of the semiconductor film, and chemical modification of the semiconductor molecular structures, the morphology of the semiconductor crystals can be effectively improved (Huang et al., 2014).

In addition, polymer additives can effectively control the orientation and morphology of organic semiconductor crystals (He et al., 2019). The morphology of crystal is usually controlled by changing the ratio of polymer to semiconductor, concentration, solvent and other conditions. P3HT is a widely studied p-type polymer. Bu et al. found that P3HT can control the crystallization behavior of the n-type semiconductor small molecule N,N′-dioctyl perylene diimide (C8PDI), making fibrillar C8PDI crystals (Bu et al., 2012). P3HT can also control the crystal morphology of other small semiconductor molecules such as diphenyl-naphthalenediimide (DPNDI) (Xu et al., 2018) and 2,5-di-(2-ethylhexyl)-3,6-bis (5″-n-hexyl-2,2′,5′,2′′] terthiophen-5-yl)-pyrrole [3,4-c] pyrrole-1,4-dione (SMDPPEH) (Bi et al., 2019). 6,13-bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl) pentacene (TP) is a solution processable p-type organic semiconductor with high hole mobility. The addition of P3HT can transform TP from disorderly arranged large needle-shaped crystals into curved thin lines, enhancing its long-range ordering (Chen et al., 2013). The addition of polyacrylate, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and other polymers can also improve the molecular orientation of TP and enhance its long-range ordering (He et al., 2013; He et al., 2020). Huang et al. used the amphiphilic block copolymer PEG-block-poly(ethyleneimine) (PEG-b-PEI) as the additive of a perylene derivative (Huang et al., 2016). By adjusting the concentration of the block copolymer and the pH of the solution, a series of perylene derivative with different crystal morphologies can be obtained. In addition, polymer additives can also improve the uniformity of the semiconductor film morphology, and induce phase separation between the semiconductor molecule and the polymer (Asare-Yeboah et al., 2016; Da Rocha et al., 2018). Therefore, adding polymer additives is a widely used and robust strategy to regulate the crystal structure of semiconductors.

Block copolymers can combine the superior properties of different polymers, and also produce various phase structures and self-assembly morphologies due to microphase separation (Kim et al., 2010). PEG has flexible mechanics and good solubility in water, alcohol and other green solvents. Here, we use block copolymer systems (combining P3HT with PEG) to regulate the C8PDI crystallization, hoping that the block copolymers can bring some new properties while maintaining the crystal modification effect of P3HT on C8PDI. By keeping PEG at the same molecular weight, a series of block copolymers containing different numbers of P3HT fragments were synthesized. We first explored the regulation effect of different block copolymers on C8PDI crystallization and found that the crystallization modification effect is retained and gradually enhanced as P3HT content increases, making the length and width of C8PDI crystals gradually decrease. Then we prepared stable crystalline P3HT-b-PEG/C8PDI micelles in water by extracting their micelles in toluene (Tol) with water, which provides a new way to prepare pollution-free aqueous organic semiconductor inks for printing electronic devices.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of block copolymers. Three block copolymers were synthesized by cycloaddition click reaction between monoethynyl-terminated P3HT (EP3HT) and azide-terminated PEG (azide-PEG) by copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne, shown in Scheme 1 (Kempf et al., 2013). The specific experimental steps are shown in the experimental section. EP3HT was synthesized according to the reported method (Jeffries-El et al., 2005; Miyakoshi et al., 2005). The product was purified by column chromatography and recycling preparative liquid chromatography. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy shows the regioregularity of EP3HT is 90% (Supplementary Figure S1). According to the gel permeation chromatography (GPC), the number average molecular weight (Mn) of EP3HT is 2,800 g/mol and the polymer dispersity index (PDI) is 1.15 (Supplementary Figures S2, S3, S4). The Mn and PDI of the EP3HT are also determined to be 1800 g/mol and 1.01, respectively, by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF-MS) (Supplementary Figure S5). The ratio of monoethynyl end-capped EP3HT is 95% and the double ethynyl end-capped EP3HT is 5%, which is calculated from the MALDI-TOF-MS spectrum. We purchased three kinds of azide-PEGs with different structures but same weight average molecular weight (Mw). The azide-PEGs were purified by sedimentation in ether. Their structures were characterized by 1H NMR and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Supplementary Figure S6) and their molecular weights were measured by GPC. These three kinds of azide-PEGs were coupled with the synthesized EP3HT to generate P3HT-b-PEG, P3HT-b-PEG-b-P3HT and four-armed P3HT-b-PEG (4P3HT-b-PEG) respectively by copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition click reaction. The success of block copolymers synthesis was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy and the molecular weights measured by GPC.

SCHEME 1
www.frontiersin.org

SCHEME 1. Synthetic routes of block copolymers.

Self-Assembly in o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB). To investigate the crystallization modification effect of block copolymers, we compared the crystallization behavior of C8PDI without and with block copolymers. 1.0 mg/ml C8PDI supersaturated solution in o-DCB was prepared by heating at 120°C for hours. Before precipitation, the solution was put into ultrasound for 2 h. Yellow clear solution changed to brick red suspension soon after putting in the sonication bath. The resulted crystals show an average length of 2.91 μm and an average width of 0.33 μm, as shown in Figure 1. The control experiment was done with 2.0 mg/ml P3HT-b-PEG and 1.0 mg/ml C8PDI in o-DCB. The supersaturated solution of C8PDI with P3HT-b-PEG is in orange color and clear for hours after cooled to room temperature, while the C8PDI supersaturated solution without block copolymers precipitates soon after cooling. During sonication, the C8PDI with P3HT-b-PEG solution changes to wine red color and remains clear. By radiating the solution with a red laser, distinct Tyndall scattering was observed which means colloid is formed (Supplementary Figure S7). After checking the colloid with TEM (shown in Figure 1B), needle-like micelles were observed. The micelles might be constructed of C8PDI crystals in the core and surrounded by P3HT-b-PEG layers.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. TEM images of C8PDI crystals sonocrystallized from 0.5 mg/ml o-DCB solution without (A) and with 1.0 mg/ml block copolymers, and the block copolymers are P3HT-b-PEG (B), P3HT-b-PEG-b-P3HT (C) and 4P3HT-b-PEG (D). The length (E) and width (F) statistics charts of the corresponding C8PDI crystals.

By replacing the diblock copolymer P3HT-b-PEG with triblock copolymer and dendritic star copolymer, colloids with distinct Tyndall scattering were also obtained. From the TEM results shown in Figure 1, all the three colloids are composed of needle-like micelles. As the number of P3HT block increases, the average length of the needle-like micelles decreases from 0.83, to 0.67 and 0.44 μm, and the average width decreases from 50 to 44 and 34 nm. It is noted that the size of C8PDI crystals from the colloid of 4P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI is an order of magnitude smaller than pure C8PDI crystals both in length and width.

It can be clearly seen that, blending C8PDI with block copolymers containing P3HT segments and using the ultrasound treatment can modify the C8PDI crystals morphology, making the C8PDI crystals shorter, thinner, more dispersed and more uniform, which suggests that the crystallization modification effect of the copolymers on C8PDI was gradually strengthened. The block copolymers would adsorb on ends and sides of the C8PDI crystal planes, thereby inhibiting the longitudinal and lateral growth of the C8PDI crystals. At the same time, ultrasound promotes crystallization and makes crystals more uniform (Kurotani et al., 2009). These results prove that block copolymers containing P3HT segments have regulation effect on C8PDI crystals and provides a new idea for adjusting the crystal morphology of organic semiconductors.

Crystallization in different solvents. The crystallization of diblock copolymer and C8PDI in different solvents was also explored. Using o-DCB and Tol as solvents, respectively, solutions of diblock copolymer P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI were prepared. The concentration ratio of P3HT-b-PEG to C8PDI is both 10:1. Similarly, heating was applied to completely dissolve the solute, and then the solutions were exposed to ultrasound for 2 h. The crystals morphology before and after the ultrasound treatment were shown in Figure 2. C8PDI crystals were fibrous before the ultrasound treatment both in o-DCB and Tol, and after the ultrasound treatment, C8PDI changed to rod-like crystals with much smaller size. As for the diblock copolymer P3HT-b-PEG, the crystals were seaweed-like in o-DCB both before and after the ultrasound treatment. While in Tol, they were dendritic-like crystals before the ultrasound treatment and changed to square flake crystals after the ultrasound treatment. The dendritic and seaweed crystals of the diblock copolymer were both caused by the PEG block crystallization (Zhai et al., 2006), and the square flake crystal is the typical single crystal morphology of PEG (Jiang et al., 2014). Supplemenatry Figure S8 shows the regular square crystals of pure P3HT-b-PEG and pure PEG-N3 in Tol after the ultrasound treatment. In summary, the diblock copolymer and C8PDI have different crystal morphologies in different solvents.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. TEM images of P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI drop-cast from o-DCB solution (10:1) before (A) and after (B) ultrasound treatment. TEM images of P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI drop-cast from Tol solution (10:1) before (C) and after (D) ultrasound treatment.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments were performed on the films corresponding to the four samples in Figure 2 and the XRD patterns is shown in Figure 3. When P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI were in o-DCB, they exhibited multiple distinct diffraction peaks at 2 θ values 11.1, 13.2, 19.2, 19.8, 23.2, and 23.7° before the sonocrystallization. The peaks at 11.1, 13.2, 19.8, and 23.7° result from the C8PDI crystals. The peaks at 19.8 and 11.1° correspond to d-spacing 4.48 and 7.97 Å, respectively, corresponding to the lattice parameters a (along the length) and b (along the width), respectively (Ameen et al., 2013). And the peak at 23.7° corresponds to d-spacing 3.75 Å, which is a typical intermolecular distance of perylene molecule along the π-π stacking direction (Ameen et al., 2013). Two primary characteristic diffraction peaks of crystalline PEG phase at 2θ = 19.2 and 23.2° were also observed (Jiang et al., 2008), corresponding to d-spacing 4.62 and 3.83 Å, respectively. The peaks at 19.2 and 23.2° correspond to the 120, and 032 and 112 crystal planes of monoclinic PEG crystals, respectively (Zhang et al., 2009). After the sonocrystallization, there is no significant change in diffraction peaks compared with before the sonocrystallization. When P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI were in Tol, they showed diffraction peaks at the same positions as in o-DCB, indicating that changing the solvent from o-DCB to Tol or ultrasound treatment didn’t change the crystal structure of P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI and the different crystal morphology of P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI in o-DCB and Tol was caused by dynamics.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. XRD patterns of P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI (10:1) in o-DCB and Tol before sonocrystallization (B.S.) and after sonocrystallization (A.S.).

Preparation of micelles of diblock copolymer and C8PDI in water. By extracting the Tol solution of diblock copolymer P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI (10:1) with water, crystalline P3HT-b-P3HT/C8PDI micelles in water were successfully prepared. The specific method is first adding water to the Tol solution after ultrasonic crystallization and vigorously shaking the solution. After letting the solution stand for a period of time, the solution could be clearly divided into two layers. The upper layer, Tol phase, was emulsion, and the lower water phase was light yellow, clear, transparent (Supplementary Figure S7B). The water phase had the Tyndall effect, so it was a hydrosol. (Supplementary Figure S7C). By observing the crystal morphology in the hydrosol, it is proved that the diblock copolymer and C8PDI have been successfully extracted from the Tol phase into the water phase. From the TEM image (Figure 4A), the short and rod-like C8PDI crystals and dendritic P3HT-b-PEG crystals can be seen. Figure 4B is a cryo-TEM image, from which the lattice of C8PDI crystal can be clearly seen. What’s more, the hydrosol of P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI can be stable for more than 2 weeks. The successful extraction is mainly attributed to the high solubility of PEG block in water. The solubility of the diblock copolymer in Tol is greater than that of C8PDI. Therefore, after ultrasound treatment, the diblock copolymer and C8PDI will form a micellar structure with P3HT-b-PEG as the coronal and C8PDI as the core. Since PEG is soluble in water, the micelles of diblock copolymer and C8PDI are soluble in water. Therefore, after adding water, the micelles will transfer to the water phase and finally reach a distribution equilibrium between Tol and water. We also used other copolymers to do this experiment but the results were not as good as P3HT-b-PEG. As for P3HT-b-PEG, it is noted that changing the concentration ratio of P3HT-b-PEG to C8PDI to 8:1 or 6:1, stable nanocrystalline micelles of diblock copolymer and C8PDI in water can be still successfully obtained by the method we described above.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. TEM image (A) and cryo-TEM image (B) of P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI drop-cast from water colloid which was extracted from sonicated Tol solution (P3HT-b-PEG: C8PDI = 10:1).

The UV-vis absorption spectra of solutions or colloidal solutions (Figure 5A) also prove this phenomenon. The UV−vis spectrum of P3HT-b-PEG colloid in Tol after ultrasound (the blue line) shows an absorption band ranging from 300 to 550 nm with a maximum at about 420 nm (Reichstein et al., 2016). The absorption of P3HT-b-PEG colloid in water (the yellow line, extracted from its sonicated Tol solution) is redshifted by 10 nm compared with that in Tol. C8PDI nanocrystals in sonicated Tol solution (the red line) shows absorption between 400–700 nm (Le et al., 2018). The peak at about 590 nm is due to the assembly of C8PDI molecules. The absorption of P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI colloid in sonicated Tol solution (the green line) shows an addition absorption of C8PDI and P3HT-b-PEG. The absorption at 580 nm corresponds to the absorption at 590 nm of the C8PDI nanocrystals in sonicated Tol solution. P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI colloid in water extracted from their Tol solution (the orange line) shows an absorption band ranging from 400 to 650 nm with the maximum absorption peak at 480 nm and two shoulder peaks at 530 and 580 nm, respectively. The shoulder peak at 580 nm resulting from the assembly of C8PDI proves the success of extracting C8PDI from the Tol solution into the water.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Normalized UV−vis spectra (A)and PL emission spectra (B) of C8PDI nanocrystals suspended in Tol noted as C8PDI (Tol), P3HT-b-PEG in Tol after ultrasound noted as P3HT-b-PEG (Tol), P3HT-b-PEG colloid in water extracted from its sonicated Tol solution noted as P3HT-b-PEG (H2O), P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI (10:1) colloid in Tol noted as P3HT-b-PEG + C8PDI (Tol), and P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI colloid in water extracted from their sonicated Tol solution noted as P3HT-b-PEG + C8PDI (H2O). PL emission spectra were collected using an excitation wavelength of 473 nm.

Photoluminescence (PL) measurement was also used to explore the interaction between P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI. We prepared C8PDI (0.2 mg/ml), P3HT-b-PEG (2 mg/ml) and P3HT-b-PEG: C8PDI (2:0.2) Tol solutions because pure C8PDI has low solubility in Tol even at high temperature. Similarly, heat was applied to completely dissolve the solute and then the solutions were exposure to ultrasound. After the ultrasound, the PL spectra of the three samples were measured. And the P3HT-b-PEG: C8PDI (2:0.2) colloidal solution and P3HT-b-PEG (2 mg/ml) colloidal solution were extracted by water, then the PL of these two water phases were also measured. The results were shown in Figure 5B. The typical PL spectrum of C8PDI has three main peaks from 530 to 650 nm (Boobalan et al., 2014) and P3HT-b-PEG has a maximum PL intensity at ∼576 nm which is characteristic of regioregular P3HT in good solvent (McCullough, 1998). The PL intensity of C8PDI was much higher than that of P3HT-b-PEG, and the PL of the blend solution had a middle intensity between P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI. In other words, P3HT-b-PEG partially quenched the PL of C8PDI, indicating that there is energy transfer between P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI. After the extraction, pure P3HT-b-PEG in water, and P3HT-b-PEG and C8PDI in water had very weak fluorescence, and the maximum PL intensity is at 600 and 620 nm, respectively.

Materials and Methods

Materials

2,5-dibromo-3-hexylthiophene, isopropylmagnesium chloride (2.0 M solution in THF), ethynylmagnesium bromide (0.5 M solution in THF) and deuterated chloroform were purchased from Energy Chemical. Copper (I) bromide was purchased from aladdin. N,N,N′,N′,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) was purchased from Innochem. 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)-propanenickel (II) chloride [Ni(dppp)Cl2] was purchased from Acros. Neutral alumina was purchased from Shanghai Weiting. Deionized water was purchased from Xi’an Dongguan. Tetrahydrofuran (THF), dichloromethane, methanol, diethyl ether, hexane, chloroform, Tol, o-DCB were purchased from Chengdu Kelong. THF was freshly distilled prior to use from sodium/benzophenone under argon. Dichloromethane was freshly distilled prior to use from calcium hydride under argon. Diethyl ether was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate. Azide-PEGs mPEG-N3 (Mw = 20,000), N3-PEG-N3 (Mw = 20,000) and 4Arm-PEG-N3 (Mw = 20,000) were purchased from Meiluo Technology. C8PDI was purchased from Ogantec.

Instrumentation

1H-NMR spectra were obtained on an Ascend 400 spectrometer at room temperature. The solvent in measurement was deuterated chloroform. GPC measurements were carried out at room temperature on a PL-GPC 220 using THF as eluent at a flow rate of 1ml/min at room temperature. MALDI-TOF mass measurements were performed on a Bruker autoflex III smartbeam MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer using 2-[(2E)-3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methylprop-2-enylidene] malononitrile (DCTB) as matrix. UV-vis spectra were recorded using a Lambda 35 UV-vis spectrometer. FT-IR spectra were obtained on a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer. The PL measurement was performed on a QM40 spectrometer. The recycling preparative liquid chromatography is LC-9104. The flow rate was 12 ml/min. Ultrasound treatment was performed on a 20 kHz KC-D40A ultrasonic cleaner at 12–18°C. TEM was performed on a HITACHI HT 7700 electron microscope operating at 95kV accelerating voltage. XRD analysis was performed on a SMARTLAB(3) diffractometer. Cryo-TEM image was obtained at a FEI Talos F200C TEM.

Synthetic Procedures

Synthesis of EP3HT. 2,5-dibromo-3-hexylthiophene (4.034 g, 12 mmol) and THF (48 ml) were added to a 200 ml Schlenk flask. Then isopropylmagnesium chloride (6 ml, 12 mmol) was added to the flask at 0°C and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. After the reaction, the solution was transferred to another 500 ml flask containing 433.6 mg Ni(dppp)Cl2 and 96 ml THF. The mixture was then stirred overnight at room temperature. 6.72 ml ethynylmagnesium bromide (0.5 M solution in THF, 3.36 mmol) was added to the flask and the solution was stirred for another 6 h. The reaction was quenched by adding methanol. Filtering could be used to get crude product and the product was purified by Soxhlet extractions with methanol, hexane and chloroform. The hexane extraction was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, eluent: chloroform) and circulating preparative liquid chromatography (eluent: Tol) to get the final product. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 0.91 (t, 42H, -CH3), 1.26–1.43 (m, 84H, -CH2-), 1.61 (m, 28H, Ar-CH2-CH2-), 2.74–2.56 (m, 28H, Ar-CH2-), 3.53 (s, 1H, -C≡CH), 6.89–7.06 (s, 14H, Ar-H). GPC: Mn = 2,795, PDI = 1.15. MALDI-MS: Mn = 1832, PDI = 1.01.

General procedure for the synthesis of block copolymers. All block copolymers were prepared by the similar procedure. EP3HT (45 mg, 0.024 mmol), mPEG-N3 (413.4 mg, 0.02 mmol) and CuBr (58 mg, 0.4 mmol) were placed in a 50 ml Schlenk flask. 15 ml THF was added to the flask and the mixture was purged with argon for 20 min. After adding 85.2 μl PMDETA (0.4 mmol) to the flask and the solution was purged with argon for another 10 min. The reaction was kept for 2 days at 45°C. After the reaction, the solution was purified by neutral Al2O3 column twice (eluent: Tol/methanol = 25/1, v/v).

P3HT-b-PEG: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): Triazole ring: 7.82 (s, 1H, -N3HC2-). P3HT block: 6.98 (s, 10.3H, Ar-H), 2.79–2.57 (m, 21H, Ar-CH2-), 1.68 (m, 19.8H, Ar-CH2-CH2-), 1.25–1.41 (m, 74.6H, -CH2-), 0.89 (t, 30.5H, -CH3). PEG block: 4.5 (t, 2H, -CH2-N3HC2-), 3.79–3.46 (m, 1629H, -OCH2CH2-), 3.37 (s, 4H, -OCH3). GPC: Mn = 9761, PDI = 1.77.

P3HT-b-PEG-b-P3HT:1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): Triazole ring: 7.82 (s, 2H, -N3HC2-). P3HT block: 6.98 (s, 20.7H, Ar-H), 2.79–2.57 (m, 41.6H, Ar-CH2-), 1.68 (m, 42H, Ar-CH2-CH2-), 1.25–1.41 (m, 120H, -CH2-), 0.89 (t, 60H, -CH3). PEG block: 4.5 (t, 4H, -CH2-N3HC2-), 3.79–3.46 (m, 1714H, -OCH2CH2-). GPC: Mn = 15,582, PDI = 1.56.

4P3HT-b-PEG:1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): Triazole ring: 7.82 (s, 4H, -N3HC2-). P3HT block: 6.98 (s, 40.3H, Ar-H), 2.79–2.57 (m, 78H, Ar-CH2-), 1.68 (m, 80H, Ar-CH2-CH2-), 1.25–1.41 (m, 250H, -CH2-), 0.89 (t, 130H, -CH3). PEG block: 4.5 (t, 9H, -CH2-N3HC2-), 3.79–3.46 (m, 1844H, -OCH2CH2-). GPC: Mn = 15,585, PDI = 1.61. The GPC results were shown in Supplementary Table S1.

Preparation of Nanocrystal Suspension

The blend solution of block copolymer and C8PDI was heated at 120°C to make the solute dissolve completely. After cooled to room temperature, the solution was exposed to ultrasound for 2 h. The solution was shaken by hand for 0.5 h, and then sonicated for another 1.5 h without shaking. The water temperature of ultrasonic cleaner was maintained at 12–18°C by cooling circulation pump. The nanocrystal suspension of pure block copolymer or C8PDI was prepared by the same method.

Preparation of TEM Samples

Drop cast 2 μl of suspension on copper grid coated with carbon film and the excess suspension was removed by filter paper. After drying in air, the samples were checked by TEM.

Preparation of XRD Samples

XRD samples were prepared by drop casting 50–150 μl solutions or colloidal solutions respectively on freshly washed silicon wafers.

Conclusion

A series of P3HT and PEG block copolymers containing linear diblock, triblock and dendritic star block copolymers were synthesized and found to be able to regulate the crystallization of C8PDI. The regulation effect increases as the P3HT block increases. On the other hand, stable crystalline P3HT-b-PEG/C8PDI micelles in water were successfully prepared, which provides a new way to make pollution-free aqueous organic semiconductor inks for printing electronic devices.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21973072, 51873172, 11905306, 51473132), Key Laboratory Construction Program of Xi’an Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (201805056ZD7CG40) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The authors acknowledge the Instrumental Analysis Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University for cryo-TEM measurement. The authors acknowledge the group of prof. Guangde Chen from the School of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University for the PL measurement.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.699387/full#supplementary-material

References

Ameen, M. Y., Abhijith, T., De, S., Ray, S. K., and Reddy, V. S. (2013). Linearly Polarized Emission from PTCDI-C-8 One-Dimensional Microstructures. Org. Electron. 14, 554–559. doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2012.12.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asare-Yeboah, K., Bi, S., He, Z., and Li, D. (2016). Temperature Gradient Controlled crystal Growth from TIPS Pentacene-Poly(alpha-Methyl Styrene) Blends for Improving Performance of Organic Thin Film Transistors. Org. Electron. 32, 195–199. doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2016.02.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bi, S., Li, Y., He, Z., Ouyang, Z., Guo, Q., and Jiang, C. (2019). Self-assembly Diketopyrrolopyrrole-Based Materials and Polymer Blend with Enhanced crystal Alignment and Property for Organic Field-Effect Transistors. Org. Elect. 65, 96–99. doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2018.11.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boobalan, G., Imran, P. M., Ramkumar, S. G., and Nagarajan, S. (2014). Fabrication of Luminescent Perylene Bisimide Nanorods. J. Lumin. 146, 387–393. doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.10.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bu, L., Pentzer, E., Bokel, F. A., Emrick, T., and Hayward, R. C. (2012). Growth of Polythiophene/perylene Tetracarboxydiimide Donor/acceptor Shish-Kebab Nanostructures by Coupled crystal Modification. Acs Nano 6, 10924–10929. doi:10.1021/nn3043836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J., Shao, M., Xiao, K., He, Z., Li, D., Lokitz, B. S., et al. (2013). Conjugated Polymer-Mediated Polymorphism of a High Performance, Small-Molecule Organic Semiconductor with Tuned Intermolecular Interactions, Enhanced Long-Range Order, and Charge Transport. Chem. Mater. 25, 4378–4386. doi:10.1021/cm403039y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Da Rocha, C. T., Haase, K., Zheng, Y., Loeffler, M., Hambsch, M., and Mannsfeld, S. C. B. (2018). Solution Coating of Small Molecule/polymer Blends Enabling Ultralow Voltage and High-Mobility Organic Transistors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 4, 1800141–1800149. doi:10.1002/aelm.201800141

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Diao, Y., Shaw, L., Bao, Z., and Mannsfeld, S. C. B. (2014). Morphology Control Strategies for Solution-Processed Organic Semiconductor Thin Films. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2145–2159. doi:10.1039/c4ee00688g

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, M., Wang, M., Lin, C., and Lin, Z. (2014). Optimization of Molecular Organization and Nanoscale Morphology for High Performance Low Bandgap Polymer Solar Cells. Nanoscale 6, 3984–3994. doi:10.1039/c3nr06298h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Z., Chen, J., and Li, D. (2019). Polymer Additive Controlled Morphology for High Performance Organic Thin Film Transistors. Soft Matter 15, 5790–5803. doi:10.1039/c9sm01053j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Z., Li, D., Hensley, D. K., Rondinone, A. J., and Chen, J. (2013). Switching Phase Separation Mode by Varying the Hydrophobicity of Polymer Additives in Solution-Processed Semiconducting Small-Molecule/polymer Blends. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 113301–113305. doi:10.1063/1.4820588

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Z., Zhang, Z., Bi, S., Asare-Yeboah, K., and Chen, J. (2020). Ultra-low Misorientation Angle in Small-Molecule Semiconductor/polyethylene Oxide Blends for Organic Thin Film Transistors. J. Polym. Res. 27, 75–81. doi:10.1007/s10965-020-02047-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, M., Antonietti, M., and Cölfen, H. (2016). Morphology-controlled Growth of Perylene Derivative Induced by Double-Hydrophilic Block Copolymers. APL Mater. 4, 015705–015714. doi:10.1063/1.4934704

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Y., Kramer, E. J., Heeger, A. J., and Bazan, G. C. (2014). Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells: Morphology and Performance Relationships. Chem. Rev. 114, 7006–7043. doi:10.1021/cr400353v

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeffries-El, M., Sauvé, G., and McCullough, R. D. (2005). Facile Synthesis of End-Functionalized Regioregular Poly(3-Alkylthiophene)s via Modified Grignard Metathesis Reaction. Macromolecules 38, 10346–10352. doi:10.1021/ma051096q

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, X., Liu, X., Liao, Q., Wang, X., Yan, D.-D., Huo, H., et al. (2014). Probing Interfacial Properties Using a Poly(ethylene Oxide) Single crystal. Soft Matter 10, 3238–3244. doi:10.1039/c3sm52975d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Y.-X., Xu, J.-M., Zhuang, Q.-C., Jin, L.-Y., and Sun, S.-G. (2008). A Novel PEO-Based Composite Solid-State Polymer Electrolyte with Methyl Group-Functionalized SBA-15 Filler for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. J. Solid State. Electrochem. 12, 353–361. doi:10.1007/s10008-007-0499-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kempf, C. N., Smith, K. A., Pesek, S. L., Li, X., and Verduzco, R. (2013). Amphiphilic Poly(alkylthiophene) Block Copolymers Prepared via Externally Initiated GRIM and Click Coupling. Polym. Chem. 4, 2158–2163. doi:10.1039/c3py21098g

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J. K., Yang, S. Y., Lee, Y., and Kim, Y. (2010). Functional Nanomaterials Based on Block Copolymer Self-Assembly. Prog. Polym. Sci. 35, 1325–1349. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.06.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurotani, M., Miyasaka, E., Ebihara, S., and Hirasawa, I. (2009). Effect of Ultrasonic Irradiation on the Behavior of Primary Nucleation of Amino Acids in Supersaturated Solutions. J. Cryst. Growth 311, 2714–2721. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.03.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Le, A. K., Bender, J. A., Arias, D. H., Cotton, D. E., Johnson, J. C., and Roberts, S. T. (2018). Singlet Fission Involves an Interplay between Energetic Driving Force and Electronic Coupling in Perylenediimide Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 814–826. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b11888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCullough, R. D. (1998). The Chemistry of Conducting Polythiophenes. Adv. Mater. 10, 93–116. doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4095(199801)10:2<93::aid-adma93>3.0.co;2-f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miyakoshi, R., Yokoyama, A., and Yokozawa, T. (2005). Catalyst-transfer Polycondensation. Mechanism of Ni-Catalyzed Chain-Growth Polymerization Leading to Well-Defined Poly(3-Hexylthiophene). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 17542–17547. doi:10.1021/ja0556880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reichstein, P. M., Gödrich, S., Papastavrou, G., and Thelakkat, M. (2016). Influence of Composition of Amphiphilic Double-Crystalline P3HT-B-PEG Block Copolymers on Structure Formation in Aqueous Solution. Macromolecules 49, 5484–5493. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01305

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C., Dong, H., Jiang, L., and Hu, W. (2018). Organic Semiconductor Crystals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 422–500. doi:10.1039/c7cs00490g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, H., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Jin, J., Liu, G., Li, Y., et al. (2018). Polymer-assisted Single crystal Engineering of Organic Semiconductors to Alter Electron Transport. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 10, 11837–11842. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b01731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhai, X., Wang, W., Zhang, G., and He, B. (2006). Crystal Pattern Formation and Transitions of PEO Monolayers on Solid Substrates from Nonequilibrium to Near Equilibrium. Macromolecules 39, 324–329. doi:10.1021/ma051624y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J.-F., Yang, D.-Z., Xu, F., Zhang, Z.-P., Yin, R.-X., and Nie, J. (2009). Electrospun Core−Shell Structure Nanofibers from Homogeneous Solution of Poly(ethylene oxide)/Chitosan. Macromolecules 42, 5278–5284. doi:10.1021/ma900657y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: crystallization modifiers, amphiphilic block copolymers, sonocrystallization, hydrosol, N,N′-dioctyl perylene diimide

Citation: Yang X, Lu W, Cao J, Zhai C, Li W, Zha F, Lu G, Tian H, Yu D and Bu L (2021) Crystallization Control of N,N′-Dioctyl Perylene Diimide by Amphiphilic Block Copolymers Containing poly(3-Hexylthiophene) and Polyethylene Glycol. Front. Chem. 9:699387. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.699387

Received: 23 April 2021; Accepted: 27 May 2021;
Published: 10 June 2021.

Edited by:

Kui Zhao, Shaanxi Normal University, China

Reviewed by:

Jihua Chen, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE), United States
Longzhen Qiu, Hefei University of Technology, China

Copyright © 2021 Yang, Lu, Cao, Zhai, Li, Zha, Lu, Tian, Yu and Bu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Laju Bu, laju2014@xjtu.edu.cn

Download