Design and Synthesis of 1-O- and 6′-C-Modified Heparan Sulfate Trisaccharides as Human Endo-6-O-Sulfatase 1 Inhibitors

Introduction

Heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans, which are ubiquitously distributed on the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix and basement membrane, play significant roles in adhesion, recognition, and signal transduction events (Vives et al., 2014). HS is a polyanionic polysaccharide belonging to the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) families, covalently bound to a core protein with a tetrasaccharide linkage region (El Masri et al., 2020). The HS backbone is composed of an alternative disaccharide repeating unit with all 1→4-linkages of N-acetyl-α-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) and β-D-glucuronic acid (GlcA)/α-L-iduronic acid (IdoA). The acetyl group of GlcNAc could possibly be hydrolyzed to yield the amino group followed by N-sulfation, and/or the 2-O position of the uronic acid and/or the 3-O and/or 6-O positions of GlcN could undergo sulfation through a series of enzymatic modifications (Kreuger and Kjellén, 2012). The highly sulfated regions of HS, which were characterized as S-domains, are involved in binding with various proteins, such as fibroblast growth factors, transforming growth factor-β, Wnt, and bone morphogenetic protein (Li and Kusche-Gullberg, 2016). Changes in the HS sulfation patterns may cause dissociations with these proteins, resulting in up or downregulation of the corresponding signal transduction factors. Human endo-O-sulfatases 1 and 2 (Sulf-1 and Sulf-2) are two isoforms of the extracellular endo-6-O-sulfatases responsible for the hydrolysis of the sulfate groups at the 6-O positions of the internal D-glucosamine residues (Justo et al., 2022). Both enzymes modulate the sulfation patterns and regulate the HS-protein interactions (Hanson et al., 2004; El Masri et al., 2017). Numerous diseases have been proved to be related to the overexpression of Sulf-1 and Sulf-2, including gastric and pancreatic cancers, invasive breast carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and osteoarthritis (OA) (Lai et al., 2003; Viviano et al., 2004; Otsuki et al., 2008; Otsuki et al., 2010; Rosen and Lemjabbar-Alaoui, 2010; Hur et al., 2012; Chanalaris et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2020; Severmann et al., 2020; Shamdani et al., 2020; Chivu-Economescu et al., 2022). Thus, the development of effective inhibitors may provide detailed information on their complex structures with Sulfs at the molecular level and offer an opportunity for structure-activity relationship for new drug discovery.

In our previous study, a variety of HS oligosaccharides with different chain lengths and N- and O-sulfation patterns was screened for the substrate specificity of Sulf-1, and a trisaccharide sulfate, IdoA2OS-GlcNS6OS-IdoA2OS 1 (Figure 1), was identified as the minimal size of substrate for Sulf-1 (Chiu et al., 2020). A substrate analog 2 with the sulfonamide at the 6′-O position of GlcNS and a 5-amino-1-n-pentyl group at the 1-O position of IdoA had been developed as an inhibitor of Sulf-1. Although compound 2 could be immobilized on the chip of Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) for measurement of the dissociation constant (K_D) with Sulf-1 or possibly be applied as a probe to identify new Sulfs via its attachment to the magnetic nanoparticles, the 5-amino-1-n-pentyl linker may cause the difficulty for crystallization of compound 2 with Sulf-1 for X-ray determination of the complex structure since its flexibility and the amino group might create an additional salt bridge with protein. Furthermore, the linker part may not be appropriate for the development of potential drug candidates. Inspired by the structure of Fondaparinux 3 (Chang et al., 2014), an anticoagulant drug used in the clinic, the methyl group is introduced to replace the 5-amino-1-n-pentyl group at the reducing end, and the substrate 4 and the 6′-O-sulfonamide inhibitor 5 are designed and prepared to test their activities for Sulf-1. Additionally, the 6′-N-sulfate 6 is synthesized for its interaction with Sulf-1 and its comparison with compounds 4 and 5.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Structures of Sulf-1’s trisaccharide unit 1 and inhibitor 2 with a 5-amino-1-n-pentyl linker, the anticoagulant Fondaparinux 3, and the proposed Sulf-1’s substrate 4 and inhibitors of the 6′-O-sulfonamide 5 and the 6′-N-sulfate 6 with the methyl group at 1-O.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of the Sulf-1 substrate 4. The backbone assembly of the target trisaccharide 4 is approached through a [1 + 2] strategy. The preparation of the disaccharide acceptor 13 is illustrated in Scheme 1. A coupling of the D-glucosamine-derived thioglycoside 7 with the 1,6-anhydro-β-L-idopyranosyl 4-alcohol 8 was carried out to yield the desired α-disaccharide 9 (71%), according to our previous report (Zulueta et al., 2012). Copper (II) trifluoromethanesulfonate-catalyzed acetolysis of compound 9 to open the 1,6-anhydro ring in acetic anhydride furnished the 1,6-diacetate 10 (88%), which underwent anomeric acetyloxy replacement via a combination of trimethylsilyl p-toluenyl thioether (TMSSTol) and zinc iodide (ZnI₂) to give the corresponding thioglycoside 11 in 76% yield. Treatment of the disaccharide donor 11 with methanol in the presence of N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) and trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) as the activators afforded the expected α-methyl disaccharide 12 (60%) because of neighboring group participation of the 2-O-benzoyl group. The stereochemistry was determined through a series of NMR spectral analyses, indicating the correlation of W-coupling between 1-H and 3-H in the 2D spectrum (Supplementary Material, Supplementary Pages S19–S22). Removal of the 2-naphthylmethyl (2-NAP) group at the 4′-O position of compound 12 using 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) provided the desired 4′-alcohol 13 in 79% yield.

SCHEME 1

SCHEME 1. Synthesis of the disaccharide acceptor 13. Reagents and conditions: (A) NIS, TfOH, CH₂Cl₂, 3 Å MS, −78°C to −20°C, 4 h, 71%; (B) Cu(OTf)₂, Ac₂O, RT, 1 h, 88%; (C) TMSSTol, ZnI₂, CH₂Cl₂, 0°C to RT, 3 h, 76%; (D) NIS, TfOH, MeOH, CH₂Cl₂, 3 Å MS, −50°C, 2 h, 60%; (E) DDQ, CH₂Cl₂/H₂O = 19/1, RT, 3 h, 79%. Ac, acetyl; Bn, benzyl; Bz, benzoyl; DDQ, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone; 2-NAP, 2-naphthylmethyl; NIS, N-iodosuccinimide; PBB, p-bromobenzyl; TBDPS, tert-butyldiphenylsilyl; Tf, trifluoromethanesulfonyl; TMS, trimethylsilyl; Tol, 4-methylphenyl.

With the glycosyl acceptor 13 in hand, the total synthesis of substrate 4 is depicted in Scheme 2. Benzylation of the 4-alcohol 8 (Ag₂O, BnBr) led to the ether 14 (94%), which was opened under acetolysis conditions to generate the 1,6-diacetate 15 (87%). Anomeric substitution of compound 15 promoted by ZnI₂ and TMSSTol was carried out, and the thioglycoside 16 was obtained in a 74% yield (Hu et al., 2011). Highly stereoselective α-glycosylation of the donor 16 with the acceptor 13 using NIS/TfOH delivered the desired trisaccharide 17 (71%), and all acyl groups in 17 were removed under Zemplén transesterification conditions to give the tetraol 18 (86%). Oxidation of 18 with (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) and bis(acetoxy)iodobenzene (BAIB) furnished the dilactone 19 (76%), which was subjected upon cleavage of the tert-butyldiphenylsilyl (TBDPS) group with HF•pyridine complex at the 6′-O position yielding the 6′-alcohol 20 (78%). Opening of two lactone rings in compound 20 employing 1 M lithium hydroxide aqueous solution provided the 2,6′,2″-triol 21 (90%), which could be sulfonated with SO₃•Et₃N complex to afford the corresponding 2,6′,2″-tri-O-sulfate 22 (77%). Hydrogenolysis of compound 22 with Pd(OH)₂/C and H₂ in neutral buffer solution, allowing removal of the 1,3″,4″-tri-O-benzyl and 3′-O-p-bromobenzyl groups and reducing the 2′-C-azido group to the 2′-C-amino group, led to the desired product 23 (90%). N-Sulfonation of the amine 23 with SO₃•pyridine complex at ca. pH 9.5, controlled by the addition of 1 M NaOH aqueous solution, furnished a crude mixture, which was purified through sequential Sephadex G10 size-exclusion column chromatography and Dowex 50WX8-Na⁺ ion-exchange column chromatography to yield target molecule 4 (Na⁺ salt, 77%). The structure of compound 4 was characterized through analyses of its 1D and 2D NMR spectra (Supplementary Material, Supplementary Pages S45–S49). The molecular weight of 4 (M+6Na⁺+H⁺, calculated for C₁₉H₂₆NO₂₉S₄Na₆⁺ 997.8854, found 997.8815) was further confirmed by the high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrum (Supplementary Material, Supplementary Page S50).

SCHEME 2

SCHEME 2. Synthesis of the Sulf-1 substrate 4. Reagents and conditions: (A) BnBr, Ag₂O, CH₂Cl₂, 3 Å MS, RT, 48 h, 94%; (B) Cu(OTf)₂, Ac₂O, RT, 1 h, 87%; (C) TMSSTol, ZnI₂, CH₂Cl₂, 0°C to RT, 3 h, 74%; (D) NIS, TfOH, CH₂Cl₂, 3 Å MS, −40°C, 2 h, 71%; (E) NaOMe, CH₂Cl₂/MeOH = 1/1, 0°C to RT, 24 h, 86%; (F) TEMPO, BAIB, CH₂Cl₂/H₂O = 2/1, RT, 6 h, 76%; (G) HF•pyridine, THF, 0°C to rt, 24 h, 78%; (H) 1 M LiOH_(aq), THF, RT, 1 h, 90%; (I) SO₃•Et₃N, DMF, 65°C, 24 h, 77%; (J) Pd(OH)₂/C, H_2(g), phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0), MeOH, RT, 48 h, 90%; (K) SO₃•pyridine, 1 M NaOH_(aq), H₂O, RT, 48 h, 77%. BAIB, [bis(acetoxy)iodo]benzene; DMF, N,N-dimethylformide; TEMPO, (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl; THF, tetrahydrofuran.

Synthesis of the 6′-O-sulfonamide trisaccharide inhibitor 5. Scheme 3 describes the synthesis of HS trisaccharide analog 5 containing the 6′-O-sulfonamide as the Sulf-1 inhibitor. Starting from the common trisaccharide intermediate 20, the 6′-hydroxy group was treated with N-benzyl sulfamoyl chloride and pyridine to give the N-benzyl-6′-O-sulfonamide derivative 24 (78%). It should be noted that the reaction needed to be quenched in 15 min since the NH-proton could be removed by the base and further coupled with N-benzyl sulfamoyl chloride to yield the unwanted side product when the reaction time is prolonged. The lactone rings of compound 24 were opened under basic conditions to provide the 2,2″-diol 25 (90%), which was converted into the corresponding di-O-sulfate 26 (70%) via sulfonation at the 2-O and 2″-O positions. Global deprotection of 26 under hydrogenolysis conditions led to the product 27 (73%), which underwent N-sulfonation to furnish the desired 6′-O-sulfonamide inhibitor 5 (Na⁺ salt) in 75% yield after consecutive purification through the size-exclusion column and ion-exchange column. The structure of compound 5 was determined via the 1D and 2D NMR spectral analyses (Supplementary Material, Supplementary Pages S57–S61). By using the trisaccharide 5 as a representative example, the assignments of all protons, including the splitting patterns and coupling constants, were examined by the 1D-Total Correlation Spectroscopy (1D-TOCSY) experiments in detail. As indicated in Figure 2, three isolated spectroscopic patterns were generated by 1H connectivity through J-coupling after the excitation of selective 1H nuclei at a given frequency (MacKinnon et al., 2016). The complicated proton NMR patterns of compound 5 could be resolved in three individual pyranosyl rings (purple one: non-reducing end L-iduronic acid sugar unit; blue one: D-glucosamine unit; red one: reducing end L-iduronic acid sugar unit) and characterized by combination with basic 1D and 2D NMR spectra. Starting from the 2D-HMBC spectrum, the correlation of ³J_C-H coupling between the anomeric carbon of the reducing end L-iduronic acid and the methyl protons at 1-O was identified. Two sets of ²J_C-H coupling correlations between the anomeric carbon of the L-iduronic acid and H-5 were also recognized. All of the anomeric hydrogen atoms could be illustrated through the ¹J_C-H coupling between the corresponding anomeric carbon via the 2D-HSQC spectroscopy. In comparison with the 1D-TOCSY spectra, the red individual ¹H spectrum was elucidated for the reducing end L-iduronic acid sugar unit via the corresponding H-1 and H-5. The purple individual ¹H spectrum corresponded to the nonreducing end L-iduronic acid sugar unit through the H-5” correlation. The remaining blue individual ¹H spectrum represented the D-glucosamine sugar unit. Finally, all proton peaks were assigned with the combination of 2D-COSY spectrum analysis. These techniques were applied to identify the structures of all compounds in this study. In addition, the high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrum further confirmed the correct molecular weight of 5 (M-6H⁺+5Na⁺, calculated for C₁₉H₂₆N₂O₂₈S₄Na₅⁻ 972.9049, found 972.9021) in comparison with the results of computational simulation (Supplementary Material, Supplementary Page S62).

SCHEME 3

SCHEME 3. Synthesis of the 6′-O-sulfonamide trisaccharide inhibitor 5. Reagents and conditions: (A) ClSO₂NHBn, pyridine, RT, 15 min, 78%; (B) 1 M LiOH_(aq), THF, RT, 1 h, 90%; (C) SO₃•Et₃N, DMF, 65°C, 24 h, 70%; (D) Pd(OH)₂/C, H_2(g), phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0), MeOH, RT, 48 h, 73%; (E) SO₃•pyridine, 1 M NaOH_(aq), H₂O, RT, 48 h, 75%.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. 1D-TOCSY analysis of compound 5.

Synthesis of the 6′-N-sulfate trisaccharide inhibitor 6. The aforementioned common building block 6′-alcohol 20 was utilized to synthesize the 6′-N-sulfate derivative 6 (Scheme 4). The reaction of 20 with diphenylphosphoryl azide (DPPA) and 1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) in toluene successfully transformed the 6′-hydroxy group into the 6′-azido group, and the expected 2′,6′-diazide 28 was obtained in 60% yield. Such harsh conditions, at 100°C for 24 h, were needed for the counterattack of the azide anion to the 6′-phosphate intermediate through S_N2 nucleophilic substitution. With compound 28 ready, a similar four-step conversion was carried out to generate the final target molecule 6, including the opening of two lactone rings (29, 86%), 2,2″-di-O-sulfonation (30, 86%), global deprotection by hydrogenolysis reduction, (31, 40%), and 2′,6′-di-N-sulfonation (6, 78%). Perhaps due to the chelation effect of the amino groups with the palladium catalyst causing difficult separation, the 2′,6′-diamine 31 was isolated in moderate yield. The structure of compound 6 was determined via the 1D and 2D NMR spectral analyses (Supplementary Material, Supplementary Pages S69–S73). The high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrum has confirmed the correct molecular weight of 6 (M + Na⁺, calculated for C₁₉H₂₈N₂O₂₈S₄Na₅⁺ 974.9194, found 974.9195) in comparison with the result of computational simulation (Supplementary Material, Supplementary Page S74).

SCHEME 4

SCHEME 4. Synthesis of the 6′-N-sulfate trisaccharide inhibitor 5. Reagents and conditions: (A) DPPA, DBU, toluene, 100°C, 24 h, 60%; (B) 1 M LiOH_(aq), THF, rt., 1 h, 86%; (C) SO₃•Et₃N, DMF, 65°C, 24 h, 86%; (D) Pd(OH)₂/C, H_2(g), phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0), MeOH, rt., 48 h, 40%; (E) SO₃•pyridine, 1 M NaOH_(aq), H₂O, rt., 48 h, 78%. DBU, 1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0]undec-7-ene; DPPA, diphenylphosphoryl azide.

Sulf-1 inhibition assay. Human Sulf-1 was overexpressed and purified according to the procedure of the previous report (Chiu et al., 2020). The fluorescent assay was employed to measure the inhibitory activity by the released 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) from hydrolysis of 4-methylumbelliferyl sulfate (4-MUS) in the presence of human Sulf-1 and the inhibitor. Compounds 4, 5, and 6 were examined in these experiments. Since the methyl trisaccharide 4 exhibited similar substrate activity as 1 toward Sulf-1, it did not have any inhibition property (IC₅₀ ˃ 100 μM). The IC₅₀ value of the 6′-O-sulfonamide trisaccharide 5 was measured at 0.27 μM, and the kinetic studies of the inhibitory activity showed a competitive inhibition with the Ki value of 0.14 μM (Figure 3). This indicated that replacement of the methyl moiety from 5-amino-1-n-pentyl at the 1-O position maintained a similar level of inhibitory activity to Sulf-1, suggesting that the 5-amino-pentyl group of 2 did not contribute to additional interaction with Sulf-1. Interestingly, the 6′-N-sulfate trisaccharide 6 with the IC₅₀ value of 4.6 μM confirmed that it was an inhibitor to Sulf-1. Although the structures of compounds 4 and 6 were only one bioisosteric modification from O-sulfate to N-sulfate at the 6′-position, the interactions with Sulf-1 were different. These results have revealed that the sulfonamide group could be an appropriate moiety to inhibit Sulf-1 activity (Hanson et al., 2004). The N-sulfate moiety, albeit with lower inhibition, provided alternative considerations for the design of new inhibitors.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Kinetics studies of inhibition of compound 5. The enzyme activities were evaluated using various concentrations of substrate (0∼20 mM) and inhibitor (0∼3 uM). The results were then fitted into the competitive model using the equation Km, Obs = Km*(1+[I]/Ki), and Y=Vmax*X/(Km, Obs + X) (GraphPad). The Ki value was determined as 0.14 μM.

Conclusion

The total syntheses of the 1-O- and 6′-C-modified HS trisaccharides 4, 5, and 6 via the 6′-alcohol 20 as the common intermediate have been successfully developed. Both bicyclo[2.2.2]-lactone rings in 20 block the 2,2″-dihydroxy groups, eliminating two protecting groups and allowing the functional group transformation at the 6′-hydroxy group. A straightforward four-step transformation, including lactone opening, O-sulfonation, hydrogenolysis, and N-sulfonation, has efficiently yielded the desired products 4, 5, and 6. The 1-O-methyl-modified trisaccharide 4 has been identified as the Sulf-1 substrate that can be used to test the enzyme activity. In comparison with compound 2, the 1-O-methyl-modified 6′-O-sulfonamide trisaccharide 5 exhibits similar inhibitory property (IC₅₀ = 0.27 μM) that is an appropriate molecule to complex with Sulf-1 for further 3D structural studies by X-ray single crystal diffraction technique. Compound 5 is also a potent candidate for new drug discovery against diseases related to Sulf-1 overexpression. The 6′-N-sulfate trisaccharide 6, which is not a Sulf-1 substrate, has been characterized as an inhibitor with IC₅₀ = 4.6 μM for Sulf-1. The effectiveness of 5 to inhibit Sulf-1’s activity is 17 times better than 6.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

K-YT and Z-HT performed the experimental work and analyzed the spectral data. T-JC obtained Sulf-1 and conducted the IC₅₀ measurements. S-CH provided the ideas. S-CH, P-HL, and K-YT wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 109-2639-M-001-004-ASP to S-CH). K-YT had a scholarship supported by the Program of Research Performance Enhancement via Students Entering Ph.D. Programs Straight from an Undergraduate/Master’s Program from National Taiwan University.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.947475/full#supplementary-material

References

Chanalaris, A., Clarke, H., Guimond, S. E., Vincent, T. L., Turnbull, J. E., and Troeberg, L. (2019). Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Synthesis Is Dysregulated in Human Osteoarthritic Cartilage. Am. J. Pathology 189, 632–647. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, C.-H., Lico, L. S., Huang, T.-Y., Lin, S.-Y., Chang, C.-L., Arco, S. D., et al. (2014). Synthesis of the Heparin-Based Anticoagulant Drug Fondaparinux. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 9876–9879. doi:10.1002/anie.201404154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chiu, L.-T., Sabbavarapu, N. M., Lin, W.-C., Fan, C.-Y., Wu, C.-C., Cheng, T.-J. R., et al. (2020). Trisaccharide Sulfate and its Sulfonamide as an Effective Substrate and Inhibitor of Human Endo-O-Sulfatase-1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 5282–5292. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chivu-Economescu, M., Necula, L. G., Matei, L., Dragu, D., Bleotu, C., Sorop, A., et al. (2022). Collagen Family and Other Matrix Remodeling Proteins Identified by Bioinformatics Analysis as Hub Genes Involved in Gastric Cancer Progression and Prognosis. Ijms 23, 3214. doi:10.3390/ijms23063214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

El Masri, R., Crétinon, Y., Gout, E., and Vivès, R. R. (2020). HS and Inflammation: A Potential Playground for the Sulfs? Front. Immunol. 11. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00570

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

El Masri, R., Seffouh, A., Lortat-Jacob, H., and Vivès, R. R. (2017). The "in and Out" of Glucosamine 6-O-Sulfation: the 6th Sense of Heparan Sulfate. Glycoconj. J. 34, 285–298. doi:10.1007/s10719-016-9736-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hanson, S. R., Best, M. D., and Wong, C.-H. (2004). Sulfatases: Structure, Mechanism, Biological Activity, Inhibition, and Synthetic Utility. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 5736–5763. doi:10.1002/anie.200300632

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Y.-P., Lin, S.-Y., Huang, C.-Y., Zulueta, M. M. L., Liu, J.-Y., Chang, W., et al. (2011). Synthesis of 3-O-Sulfonated Heparan Sulfate Octasaccharides that Inhibit the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Host-Cell Interaction. Nat. Chem. 3, 557–563. doi:10.1038/nchem.1073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hur, K., Han, T.-S., Jung, E.-J., Yu, J., Lee, H.-J., Kim, W. H., et al. (2012). Up-regulated Expression of Sulfatases (SULF1 and SULF2) as Prognostic and Metastasis Predictive Markers in Human Gastric Cancer. J. Pathol. 228, 88–98. doi:10.1002/path.4055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Justo, T., Smart, N., and Dhoot, G. K. (2022). Context Dependent Sulf1/Sulf2 Functional Divergence in Endothelial Cell Activity. Ijms 23, 3769. doi:10.3390/ijms23073769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kreuger, J., and Kjellén, L. (2012). Heparan Sulfate Biosynthesis. J. Histochem Cytochem. 60, 898–907. doi:10.1369/0022155412464972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lai, J., Chien, J., Staub, J., Avula, R., Greene, E. L., Matthews, T. A., et al. (2003). Loss of HSulf-1 Up-Regulates Heparin-Binding Growth Factor Signaling in Cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23107–23117. doi:10.1074/jbc.M302203200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J.-P., and Kusche-Gullberg, M. (2016). Heparan Sulfate: Biosynthesis, Structure, and Function. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 325, 215–273. doi:10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, T.-S., Hsieh, C.-H., Kuo, C., Juang, Y.-P., Hsieh, Y. S. Y., Chiang, H., et al. (2020). Sulfation Pattern of Chondroitin Sulfate in Human Osteoarthritis Cartilages Reveals a Lower Level of Chondroitin-4-Sulfate. Carbohydr. Polym. 229, 115496. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115496

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacKinnon, N., While, P. T., and Korvink, J. G. (2016). Novel Selective TOCSY Method Enables NMR Spectral Elucidation of Metabolomic Mixtures. J. Magnetic Reson. 272, 147–157. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2016.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Otsuki, S., Hanson, S. R., Miyaki, S., Grogan, S. P., Kinoshita, M., Asahara, H., et al. (2010). Extracellular Sulfatases Support Cartilage Homeostasis by Regulating BMP and FGF Signaling Pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 10202–10207. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913897107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Otsuki, S., Taniguchi, N., Grogan, S. P., D'Lima, D., Kinoshita, M., and Lotz, M. (2008). Expression of Novel Extracellular Sulfatases Sulf-1 and Sulf-2 in Normal and Osteoarthritic Articular Cartilage. Arthritis Res. Ther. 10, R61. doi:10.1186/ar2432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosen, S. D., and Lemjabbar-Alaoui, H. (2010). Sulf-2: an Extracellular Modulator of Cell Signaling and a Cancer Target Candidate. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 14, 935–949. doi:10.1517/14728222.2010.504718

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Severmann, A.-C., Jochmann, K., Feller, K., Bachvarova, V., Piombo, V., Stange, R., et al. (2020). An Altered Heparan Sulfate Structure in the Articular Cartilage Protects against Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 28, 977–987. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2020.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shamdani, S., Chantepie, S., Flageollet, C., Henni-Chebra, N., Jouan, Y., Eymard, F., et al. (2020). Heparan Sulfate Functions Are Altered in the Osteoarthritic Cartilage. Arthritis Res. Ther. 22, 283. doi:10.1186/s13075-020-02352-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vivès, R. R., Seffouh, A., and Lortat-Jacob, H. (2014). Post-synthetic Regulation of HS Structure: The Yin and Yang of the Sulfs in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 3. doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00331

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Viviano, B. L., Paine-Saunders, S., Gasiunas, N., Gallagher, J., and Saunders, S. (2004). Domain-specific Modification of Heparan Sulfate by Qsulf1 Modulates the Binding of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein Antagonist Noggin. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 5604–5611. doi:10.1074/jbc.M310691200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zulueta, M. M. L., Lin, S.-Y., Lin, Y.-T., Huang, C.-J., Wang, C.-C., Ku, C.-C., et al. (2012). α-Glycosylation by D-Glucosamine-Derived Donors: Synthesis of Heparosan and Heparin Analogues that Interact with Mycobacterial Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8988–8995. doi:10.1021/ja302640p

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar