Abstract
In northwestern Iran, magmatic activity occurred during three main intervals: The Cretaceous, Eocene, and Miocene-Quaternary. The first two phases of magmatic activity are more consistent with arc-type magmatism on an active continental margin; whereas the last phase, which has calc-alkaline and alkaline affinities, shows more similarity to postcollisional magmatism. Magmatic belts are mostly situated in the northern and eastern parts of the Oshnavieh–Salmas–Khoy ophiolite belt (OSK-Ophiolite) in northwestern Iran. The OSK-Ophiolite is known as the Neotethys, an ocean remnant in northwestern Iran, and extends to eastern Turkey and surrounds the Van area. This configuration shows that the Van microplate and surrounding ocean have played an important role in the evolution of magmatic activity in northwestern Iran, eastern Turkey, and the Caucasus since the Cretaceous. The Van microplate is situated among the Arabian plate to the south, northwestern Iran to the east, and Armenia to the north. The subduction of the northern branch of the Neotethys oceanic lithosphere beneath southern Eurasia has been critical in flare-up magmatism in the southern Caucasus since the Late Cretaceous. Considering the Van area as a new microplate makes understanding the geodynamic evolution of this area easier than in the many tectonic models that have been suggested before. When regarding the Van microplate, the main suture zone, which is known as the Bitlis–Zagros zone, should be changed to the Zagros–Khoy–Sevan–Akera suture zone, which extends to the eastern and northern Van microplate and western Iran.
Introduction
Most crust in Iran and Turkey is part of the Alpine–Himalaya orogenic belt, which is situated at the junction of Gondwana (in the south) and the Eurasian plate (in the north) (Dewey et al., 1973; An and Harrison, 2000; Göncüoglu, 2010; Prelević and Seghedi, 2013; Tian et al., 2017). This crust includes a number of microcontinents, such as the Taurides–Anatolides and Biston–Avoramanm, Bilitis, and Van microcontinents, with the latter being added by the authors in this research (Figure 1). These microcontinents were distributed across the Tethys Ocean in the Mesozoic to early Cenozoic eras but are now surrounded by oceanic-crust remnants (Jassim and Goff, 2006). Nevertheless, there is no well-defined information to confirm that these microcontinents completely drifted from the Arabian plate (Wrobel-Daveau et al., 2010; Azizi et al., 2013; Nouri et al., 2016).
FIGURE 1
The northern fossil remnant of oceanic crust is known as the Paleo–Tethys trace, which extends from northern Iran to northern Turkey (Kroner and Romer, 2013; Manafi et al., 2013; Shafaii Moghadam and Stern, 2014). The central and southern parts (Figure 2) are known as the Neotethys remnant (Stöcklin and Nabavi, 1973; Golonka, 2004; Ghasemi and Talbot, 2006; Moghadam and Stern, 2015; Hassanzadeh and Wernicke, 2016; Nouri et al., 2019).
FIGURE 2
Magmatic activity increased in both northwestern Iran and Turkey in the Late Cretaceous and has continued through the Quaternary (Alavi, 1994). Magmatism in both regions was concentrated in four main periods: The Late Cretaceous, Eocene, Miocene, and Quaternary. According to many published research studies, most of the magmatic activity was related to the Tethys (Neotethys) orogeny, which stemmed from the subduction and collision of the Arabian plate with the Turkey and Iran plates, as well as from postcollisional tectonic regimes (Agard et al., 2006; Agard et al., 2011; Ali et al., 2013; Whitechurch et al., 2013; Nouri et al., 2016; Nouri et al., 2017; Nouri et al., 2020; Azizi et al., 2018b; Shabanian et al., 2018). Certainly, in Turkey and the western and central parts of Iran, magmatic rocks show clear similarities to the typical calc-alkaline, magmatic series common to an active continental margin (Parlak et al., 2000; Aldanmaz, 2006; Dilek and Altunkaynak, 2009; Topuz et al., 2004; Topuz et al., 2017).
The focus of this study is on magmatic activity in the region between the Black and Caspian Seas, which includes northwestern Iran, eastern Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan (Figure 2). This magmatism is of interest, as it has traditionally been considered to be a result of the subduction of oceanic crust of the Neotethys beneath Iran and southern Turkey. The site of this margin is considered to be represented by the Bitlis–Zagros–Fault (BZF) suture zone (Figures 2, 3). As the BZF suture zone is distant from the southern and western Caspian Sea (>300 km), it is problematic for the highly, calc-alkaline magmatism to be sourced from subduction coming from that area. Furthermore, the location of the Khoy ophiolite sequence would appear to be inconsistent with subduction focused solely along the BZF. The large size of the Khoy ophiolite and its composition of pelagic sediment, a large thickness of pillow lava, sheeted dikes, both layered and massive gabbro, and cumulate and tectonite peridotites, are highly consistent with typical ophiolite sequences (Hassanipak and Ghazi, 2000; Ghazi et al., 2003; Khalatbari-Jafari et al., 2003) that have been generated in a mature, oceanic basin. These seeming inconsistencies in the geological record led us to propose the existence of a new microcontinent or continental fragment that sits between the BZF suture zone to the south and the Khoy ophiolite sequence to the northeast.
FIGURE 3
In this study, we introduce a new microplate, the Van microplate, which has an area of approximately 50,000 km2 and is situated between northwestern and central Iran, the Anatolian block, and the Arabian plate (Figure 3). We outline and explain the proposed, microplate boundaries, followed by an explanation of how the northern branch of the Neotethys has controlled the magmatic activity of northwestern Iran and the Caucasus, based on this new microplate, despite the southern branch.
Geological Background
Eocene volcanic rocks are widely distributed from the southern Caspian Sea to the southern Black Sea and are almost parallel to the Cretaceous volcanic rocks (Figures 2, 3). Figures 2, 3 were compiled based on more than 20 geology maps of Iran and the surrounding area (See the Supplementary S1 for the map references). Cretaceous volcanic rocks are also extensive, although less so in comparison to the Eocene rocks (Figures 2, 3), and are limited to the south of the Zagros fault in the northern Sanandaj–Sirjan zone (SaSZ). Cretaceous magmatism primarily has calc-alkaline affinity (Azizi and Jahangiri, 2008; Azizi and Moinevaziri, 2009). Ophiolite members, known as Neotethys remnants, are widely distributed along major faults, such as the BZF and Zagros thrust-fault (ZTF) suture in southern Turkey and western Iran. The Bitlis–Zagros, which includes the BZF and ZTF here (Figures 2, 3), is known as a major suture zone between the Arabian and Iranian–Anatolian plates. It was opened in the late Paleozoic Era and closed in the Cenozoic Era (Agard et al., 2011; Alirezaei and Hassanzadeh, 2012; Abdulzahra et al., 2016; Azizi et al., 2019).
Some dismembered mafic and ultramafic rocks are exposed throughout the entire Bitlis-Zagros suture zone in the border between Iran and Iraq along the BZF (Figures 2, 3). Some researchers considered this complex as ophiolites (Ismail et al., 2010; Ali et al., 2013; Ali et al., 2016; Mohammad, 2013; Mohammad and Cornell, 2017; Al Humadi et al., 2019) and found that these rocks are more consistent with plume-type magma and barren rifts (Wrobel-Daveau et al., 2010; Azizi et al., 2013; Azizi and Stern, 2019; Karim and Al-Bidry, 2020). In this case, a barren rift between the Van microplate and Arabian plate is more likely than mature oceanic crust. These mafic rocks define the Sanandaj–Sirjan zone (SaSZ) from the Arabian plate in northwestern Iran to southern Turkey. The distribution of the magmatic rocks with the major faults from eastern Turkey to northern Iran is detailed in Figures 4A–E.
FIGURE 4
Azizi and Stern (2019) divided the SaSZ in western Iran (Figure 2) into three main parts: northern, central, and southern. In the northern part, which is separated from the Van microplate in this study and the junction, some dismembered ophiolite has been exposed. We call this the Oshnavieh-Salmas-Khoy ophiolite belt (OSK-Ophiolites) here. The OSK-Ophiolites, which has a N-S trend, is the main suture zone between the Van microplate and northwestern Iran block. We describe the OSK-Ophiolites below.
OSK Ophiolites
This dismembered ophiolite belt is exposed in a number of locations. It mainly shows mid-ocean ridge and island-arc, geochemical signatures and is widely exposed in the Khoy area, with some massive-sulfide mineralization and chromite deposits (Zaeimnia et al., 2017). In the Khoy area, the ophiolite members in the east have been classified as the main ultramafic parts of the mantle and comprise dunite and harzburgite (Khalatbari-Jafari et al., 2003). In the west, the members comprise oceanic crust, which consists of deep pelagic sediment, pillow lava, and sheeted dikes, all with a Cretaceous age. This complex was thrust onto the western side of the Van microplate, and the Precambrian basement (Azizi et al., 2011) was thrust onto the ultramafic complex on the eastern side. The entire complex was unconformably covered by Oligocene–Miocene conglomerate and a terrigenous sedimentary layer. The Khoy ophiolite sequences are typical of mid-ocean ridges in mature oceanic crust, such as the recent Pacific oceanic ridge (Sclater et al., 1971; Zhang et al., 2020).
Magmatic Activity
Magmatic activity around the Van microplate is restricted to four main intervals:
Cretaceous, Eocene, Oligocene-Miocene, and late Miocene-Quaternary.
Cretaceous Volcanic Rocks
Cretaceous volcanic rocks surrounding the Van microplate are mostly less exposed, being buried under younger sedimentary and volcanic rocks (Figures 3, 4). Cretaceous volcanic rocks are mainly interbedded with sedimentary layers and are mainly basaltic and andesitic-basaltic rocks (Azizi and Jahangiri, 2008) that have erupted in submarine environments. Due to the high levels of alteration within these rocks, there have been few studies on these rocks. Whole-rock composition confirms that these rocks were formed in an active, continental margin (Azizi and Jahangiri, 2008).
Eocene Volcanic Rocks
This group of rocks is the main volcanic suit and extends from the western Caspian Sea to Armenia, Georgia, and northern Turkey (Figures 3, 4). On the Turkish side, it is divided into two main extensions. The first part extends to the northern IAES fault, and the second extends in a NE-SW direction along the eastern Anatolian fault (EAF), which we consider to be the western edge of the Van microplate (Figures 2–4).
Oligocene–Miocene Magmatic Rocks
These volcanic and plutonic rocks are widely distributed, and they cut the Eocene volcanic rocks. Mainly Cu–Mo–Au deposits and Fe mineralization (Azizi et al., 2009; Siani et al., 2015; Mehrabi et al., 2016; Rabiee et al., 2019) occurred during magmatic activity in the western and southern areas of the Caspian Sea.
Late Miocene-Quaternary Rocks
This group of rocks is distributed along the rim of the Van microplate, and they are classified into two main groups. The first group includes adakite and adakitic rocks, and the second includes high-Nb, basaltic rocks (Jahangiri, 2007; Azizi et al., 2014a; Azizi et al., 2014b), which confirms that they were formed in a postcollisional, tectonic regime. In addition, some of the major Pliocene-Quaternary volcanoes, such as Sahand, Sabalan, and Ararat, erupted at this time (Allen et al., 2013a; Chiu et al., 2013; Ghalamghash et al., 2019).
Whole-Rock Chemistry
We have compiled whole-rock, chemical data on 900 volcanic rocks (Agostini et al., 2007; Jahangiri, 2007; Azizi and Jahangiri, 2008; Haghnazar and Malakotian, 2009; Mazhari et al., 2009, 2011; Ahmadzadeh et al., 2010; Dilek et al., 2010; Ranin et al., 2010; Aghazadeh et al., 2011; Aghazadeh et al., 2015; Ansari et al., 2011; Dabiri et al., 2011; Hajialioghli et al., 2011; Mahmoudi et al., 2011; Asiabanha and Foden, 2012; Alishah et al., 2013; Ansari, 2013; Castro et al., 2013; Ghaffari et al., 2013; Kheirkhah et al., 2013; Moghadam et al., 2014; Neill et al., 2015; Doroozi et al., 2016; Haghnazar et al., 2016; Moritz et al., 2016; Sahakyan et al., 2017; Taki, 2017; Ashrafi et al., 2018; Haghighi Bardineh et al., 2018; Jafari Sough et al., 2018; Lechmann et al., 2018; Shafaii Moghadam et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Azizi et al., 2019; Ghalamghash et al., 2019; Temizel et al., 2019) from Cretaceous to Quaternary magmatism in northwestern Iran, southern Armenia, and eastern Turkey (Supplementary S2). The sample locations and references for each area are shown in Figures 4A–E.
Cretaceous volcanic rocks include basalt to rhyolite but are mostly classified as andesite. Cretaceous intrusive bodies also show some variation from gabbro to granite, with less exposure compared to volcanic rocks. Whole-rock composition shows that the Cretaceous, magmatic rocks have a large variation in TiO2 from 0.19 to 3.82 wt% (average = 1.52 wt%, n = 125), Al2O3 from 11.2 to 22.7 wt% (average = 15.9 wt%, n = 125), and MgO from 0.03 to 11.8 wt% (average = 5.27 wt%, n = 125). In addition, these rocks have a high concentration of Ba (average = 470 ppm, n = 125), U (average = 2.82 ppm), and Th (average = 8.9 ppm). Eocene–Miocene, magmatic rocks have a large variation in SiO2 (43–77 wt%), high content of Rb (average = 100 ppm; n = 389), Sr (average = 618 ppm, n = 429), Th (average = 11.7 ppm, n = 331) and U (3.47 ppm, n = 341). The upper Miocene-Quaternary magmatic rocks are mostly categorized into two main groups: adakite, with higher ratios of Sr/Y and La/Yb; and alkali basalts, with a higher content of Nb (average = 27 ppm, n = 328). See Supplementary S2 for more information about the whole-rock chemistry of each group. For our discussion, the samples are categorized into three main groups: Cretaceous, Eocene-Miocene, and upper Miocene-Quaternary. All of the groups show variances from the basalt to the rhyolites (Figure 5) in the K2O + Na2O diagrams (Le Bas et al., 1986). Nevertheless, the alkali elements for the Cretaceous and Eocene magmatic rocks largely varied compared to the upper Miocene and Quaternary rocks.
FIGURE 5
Tectonic Setting
For understanding tectonic setting, some key and general petrological diagrams are briefly used here. The Ti/V ratio diagram (Shervais, 1982) shows a wide distribution of the Cretaceous volcanic rocks from the arc to extensional basins (Figure 6A). Eocene rocks have more affinities for the arc-magma series. The late Miocene-Quaternary arc affinity was decreased and extended to alkaline and within-plate series (Figure 6A). The Th/Yb vs. Nb/Yb diagram (Pearce, 2008) shows that most of the mafic rocks plot in the volcanic-arc field because of the higher ratios of Th/Yb (Figure 6B). The enrichment of Th occurred during the fluids released from the subduction of the oceanic crust and/or crustal contamination with some assimilation-fractionation and contamination (AFC) processes. The Cretaceous basaltic rocks show a dichotomy for both intraoceanic arc and active continental-tectonic regimes. Eocene basaltic rocks show a clear relation to the typical active continental margin. Upper Miocene-Quaternary basaltic rocks also plot in the volcanic-arc field, with some similarity to oceanic-island basaltic rocks (OIB) near the mantle array, with less effect on crustal components (Figure 6B). To avoid the mobility of some trace elements, all Eocene and younger basaltic rocks, other than Cretaceous volcanic rocks because of the wide ranges, were normalized using rare-earth elements (REEs) of the chondrite value (Sun and McDonough, 1989). The normalized pattern shows that both the Eocene and upper Miocene-Quaternary rocks have higher ratios of light REEs than heavy REEs, and negative slopes from LREEs to HREEs (Figures 7A,B). Furthermore, the REES contained in the upper Miocene-Quaternary rocks are higher than those in the Eocene basaltic rocks (Figures 7A,B).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
The plotting of the intermediate-to-acidic rocks (SiO2 > 52 wt%) in FeO/(FeO + MgO) and Na2O + K2O–CaO vs. SiO2 (Frost et al., 2001) shows that the lower ratios of FeO/(FeO + MgO) for most of the samples from the three groups plot in the magnesian and/or I–type granite fields. Some of the Cretaceous and Eocene samples extend to the ferroan granite field. The upper Miocene-Quaternary rocks mainly plot in the magnesian field and/or I-type granite area (Figure 8A). In the Na2O + K2O–CaO vs. SiO2 (wt%), Cretaceous and Eocene samples are scattered from the calcic to alkalic fields. Nevertheless, most of the samples were concentrated in the alkali-calcic field. The upper Miocene-Quaternary rocks plot in the alkali-calcic field, with less variation than the Cretaceous and Eocene samples (Figure 8B).
FIGURE 8
Intermediate-to-acidic rocks (SiO2 > 52 wt%) have higher ratios of Rb; lower ratios of Y, Ta, and Nb (Figures 9A,B); and almost plot in the active margin to within-plate domains (Pearce et al., 1984). Cretaceous intermediate-to-acidic volcanic rocks mainly plot in the active margin and within-plate tectonic fields. The variation in the Ta/Yb vs. Th/Yb ratios (Pearce, 1982) shows a wide range for the Eocene and Cretaceous intermediate-to-acidic magmatic rocks and more affinity with the upper Miocene-Quaternary for the within-plate granite field (Figure 9C).
FIGURE 9
The scattering of the Cretaceous volcanic rocks probably supports different tectonic regimes during the Cretaceous and requires more detailed work because the Cretaceous volcanic rocks were strongly altered by seawater reactions. Some parts of intermediate-to-acidic rocks have higher ratios of Sr/Y and La/Yb and, based on the adakite key diagrams (Defant and Drummond, 1990), are classified as adakite (Figure 10A). The high affinity of the upper Miocene-–Quaternary volcanic rocks for adakite groups, as well as the accompanying high-Nb basaltic rocks, means that there is a correspondence to a postcollisional tectonic regime in northwestern Iran since the Miocene (Azizi et al., 2014a; Asiabanha et al., 2018; Torkian et al., 2019).
FIGURE 10
Sr-Nd Isotope Ratios
We plotted 203 sample data points (Supplementary S2) in the 87Sr/86Sr vs. 143Nd/144Nd diagram collected from published works (Alpaslan et al., 2004; Agostini et al., 2007; Haghnazar and Malakotian, 2009; Mazhari et al., 2009, Mazhari et al., 2011; Aghazadeh et al., 2011, Aghazadeh et al., 2015; Dabiri et al., 2011; Allen et al., 2013a, Allen et al., 2013b; Ghaffari et al., 2013; Moghadam et al., 2014; Neill et al., 2015; Sahakyan et al., 2017; Haghighi Bardineh et al., 2018; Lechmann et al., 2018; Shafaii Moghadam et al., 2018; Azizi et al., 2019). Most samples plot near the mantle array with some variation for the Cretaceous and Eocene igneous rocks. Cretaceous samples plot in two main areas: the first group plots near the cross lines of the chondrite uniform reservoir (CHUR) and bulk silicate earth (BSE); and the second group, with lower ratios of 143Nd/144Nd and higher ratios of the 87Sr/86Sr, plots with the combination of both mantle and crustal components for the evolution of these rocks (Figure 11).
FIGURE 11
Eocene igneous rocks mainly plot in the depleted-mantle area and extend to the lower 143Nd/144Nd ratio and higher 87Sr/86Sr ratio fields, which show heterogeneous sources such as depleted mantle and primitive and metasomatized mantle for the sources of these rocks. Furthermore, the scattering of Eocene samples in the 87Sr/86Sr-143Nd/144Nd diagram suggests the involvement of both mantle material and crustal components in the magmatic activity during the Eocene. The scattering of the Sr–Nd isotope ratios shows three main trends for the evolution of the Eocene magmatic rocks, which we call EO.1, EO.2, and EO.3 (Figure 11). These three trends show depleted mantle with higher ratios of 143Nd/144Nd (>0.51290), such as from the subcontinental-lithospheric mantle, as the primary source. During magmatic evolution and/or later, they have been affected by crustal components (EO.2 and EO.3 trend) and/or alteration (EO.1 trend). Due to the wide distribution of Eocene volcanism and the variation in Sr-Nd isotope ratios, metasomatized mantle from the oceanic slab is also the main alternative for the genesis of these rocks, which has been suggested by many researchers for the sources of these rocks.
Upper Miocene to Quaternary samples plot near the mantle array from the depleted mantle to enriched mantle in the 87Sr/86Sr–143Nd/144Nd ratio diagram (Figure 11). Most samples are concentrated near the cross line of the CHUR, which mainly shows the combination of depleted (143Nd/144Nd > 0.512638) to primitive mantles (143Nd/144Nd = 0.512638) as the main sources of these rocks. Crustal-component interactions, for example, assimilation with the magma, are lower than those of the Eocene magmatic rocks (Figure 11), which may suggest the thinning of the continental crust after collision. Therefore, depleted mantle, oceanic-island basalt (OIB), source-like, and enriched mantle (EM2) contributed to the genesis of Eocene and upper Miocene-Quaternary magmatic activity, with less contribution from continental crust for the upper Miocene-Quaternary rocks.
Discussion
In most of the traditionally published research, the northern and eastern Bitlis–Zagros suture zone has been considered as an active continental margin since the Jurassic Period (Davoudian et al., 2008; Agard et al., 2011; Hassanzadeh and Wernicke, 2016). Recently published research has confirmed that the initiation of Neotethys subduction beneath the SaSZ (Azizi and Stern, 2019) occurred in the Cretaceous Period, and the collision of the Arabian plate and Van microplate in northwestern Iran occurred in the late Eocene epoch (Azizi et al., 2019). Nevertheless, there are some weak points concerning the relationship of ultramafic rocks to the ophiolite complex in northeastern Iraq within the suture of the Arabian plate and Van microplate. There is also no strong evidence for a typical ophiolite complex here (Azizi et al., 2013). In line with our suggestion, the new OSK zone shows that northwestern Iran-eastern Turkey magmatism was mainly controlled by Neotethys oceanic subduction, which was situated on the northern side of the Van microplate (Figures 2, 3). The Khoy ophiolites mainly occurred during the Late Cretaceous Period (Ghazi et al., 2003; Khalatbari-Jafari et al., 2003, 2004; Moghadam and Stern, 2015) and are in contact with upper Neoproterozoic/lower Paleozoic granites (Azizi et al., 2011) in the east. Additionally, the Precambrian basements mainly include intrusive granite and metamorphic rocks, which were exposed in the Khoy, Urmia (Urmiah), and Tabriz areas. Northwestern Iran was obducted onto the east side of the OSK suture zone (Figure 3).
Tertiary volcanism surrounded the Van microplate (Figures 2, 3). Meanwhile, distinct depression basins, such as the Urmia Lake basin (Figures 2, 3), were formed near the OSK suture zone. All evidence shows a typical arc-type tectonic regime here. Nevertheless, our information on the Cretaceous magmatic rocks in northwestern Iran is not sufficient. The Neotethys ophiolite or ophiolite-like belt in northwestern Iran is divided into two branches in the area around Piranshahr (Figure 3). The southern (southwestern) branch extends to northeastern Iraq and continues to southern Bitlis, and it is known as the BZF suture zone here. This branch does not show a clear relationship to typical ophiolites, but it has some correlation with plume-type (Azizi et al., 2013) sources with some affinity for immature oceanic crust and/or continental rifts. The second branch is the OSK suture zone, which extends in a NW-SE direction in western Iran and joins the Sevan-Akera suture zone (SAS) in its northern part (Figures 2, 3). The southern branch on the Iran side is named the Kermanshah-Nayriz ophiolites and is exposed along the Zagros fault in western Iran (Figure 3).
Magmatic activity since the Late Cretaceous Period developed in the northern and eastern parts of the Van microplate (Figure 3). The northern branches of the Neotethys, which were situated between the Van microplate to the south and the northwestern Iran-Armenia block (NWIA) to the north, were subducted beneath the NWIA block during the middle to Late Cretaceous Period. To consider the magmatic evolution in the southern rim of the NWIA, we suggest the following schematic model for the evolution of magmatic rocks in this belt since the Mesozoic.
Based on our suggested model, Jurassic rocks developed in the Van microplate. NWIA also probably shows the fragmentation of the Van microplate that occurred in the Late Jurassic/Early Cretaceous periods. Some evidence shows that the Jurassic magmatism was related to the extensional regime and continental rifts in the Khoy area (Khalatbari-Jafari et al., 2003; Lechmann et al., 2018; Miyazaki et al., 2018; Shafaii Moghadam et al., 2019), and they probably confirm the extensional regime or drifting of the Van microplate during the Cimmerian orogeny. This evidence is also consistent with the SaSZ tectonic regime, which had an extensional regime in the Middle-Late Jurassic Period (Azizi et al., 2018a; Badr et al., 2018; Azizi and Stern, 2019).
The OSK ophiolites have been thrust onto the passive margin and are overlaid by Paleocene sedimentary rocks. The ophiolite obduction on the passive margin probably occurred in a continental-arc collision system and, following the Neotethys, it started to subduct beneath the NWIA in the Late Cretaceous (Figures 12A,B). During subduction, nonarc magmatism, arc magmatism, and forearc basins developed in an active margin in the NWIA. Precambrian basements were obducted at this time (Figures 12A,B), and Upper Cretaceous-Eocene, magmatic rocks were produced during this process.
FIGURE 12
After colliding with the Van microplate and NWIA in the late Oligocene-Miocene, the oceanic crust experienced rollback, and the NWIA plate was overridden and affected by the extensional regime; some subsiding basins developed among the Eocene fragmented volcanic belt (Figure 12C). Deposition in the sedimentary basins started unconformably with a basal conglomerate on top of the Cretaceous-Eocene complex (Figure 12C). The extensional regime after the collision, the thinning of the NWIA, and the high-angle subduction connected both the lithospheric and asthenospheric mantle for the genesis of the magmatic rocks in the Miocene Epoch (Figure 12C). In the late stage, the oceanic crust was dismembered, and hot magma was injected from the slab window (Figure 13). Some parts of the magma erupted directly and made basaltic rocks that had a high similarity to the OIB composition in the HTV belt from Ararat to northern Sanandaj (Kheirkhah et al., 2009; Asiabanha and Foden, 2012; Azizi et al., 2014a; Torkian et al., 2016; Asiabanha et al., 2018). Other parts crystallized inside the lower crust and increased the geothermal gradient in the continental crust. This process was the basis for the partial melting of the lower crust and the production of adakite-like magma in the HTV belt during the Pliocene-Quaternary (Azizi et al., 2014b; Torkian et al., 2019).
FIGURE 13
Conclusion
This research shows that the Van microplate drifted from the Arabian plate in the Jurassic or earlier and is now surrounded by dismembered Neotethys ophiolite. During the closure of the northern branch of the Neotethys and the incorporation of the Van microplate into the southern Eurasian plate, a long period of magmatic activity (from the Late Cretaceous Period to the present) occurred along the southern rim of Eurasia, northwestern Iran, and the Caucasus. Therefore, the main suture is not Bitlis–Zagros, which has been suggested as the junction of the Arabian and Iran-Armenia plates. Instead, it seems that Zagros–Khoy–Akera is the main suture zone, and it should be considered in future studies. The Zagers–Khoy–Akera suture can explain magmatism in the Caucasus and northwestern Iran more easily than the BZS. Furthermore, the northern SaSZ separated from the Anatolian plate via the Van microplate.
Funding
This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant No. 17H01671.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
This paper benefited greatly from previously published works, most of which we referred to in this work. We would like to thank F. Nouri for some technical support. This paper was greatly improved by three anonymous reviewers and the critical comments of the editor, Me-Fu Zhou.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2020.574385/full#supplementary-material.
References
1
AbdulzahraI. K.HadiA.AsaharaY.AziziH.YamamotoK. (2016). Zircon U–Pb ages and geochemistry of Devonian a-type granites in the Iraqi Zagros Suture Zone (Damamna area): new evidence for magmatic activity related to the Hercynian orogeny. Lithos.264, 360–374. 10.1016/j.lithos.2016.09.006
2
AgardP.MoniéP.GerberW.OmraniJ.MolinaroM.MeyerB.et al (2006). Transient, synobduction exhumation of Zagros blueschists inferred from P–T, deformation, time, and kinematic constraints: implications for Neotethyan wedge dynamics. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth.111, 4103. 10.1029/2005JB004103
3
AgardP.OmraniJ.JolivetL.WhithechurchH.VrielynckB.SpakmanW.et al (2011). Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process. Geol. Mag.148, 692–725. 10.1017/S001675681100046X
4
AghazadehM.CastroA.BadrzadehZ.VogtK. (2011). Post-collisional polycyclic plutonism from the Zagros hinterland: the Shaivar Dagh plutonic complex, Alborz belt, Iran. Geol. Mag.148, 980–1008. 10.1017/S0016756811000380
5
AghazadehM.PrelevićD.BadrzadehZ.BraschiE.van den BogaardP.ConticelliS. (2015). Geochemistry, Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes and geochronology of amphibole- and mica-bearing lamprophyres in northwestern Iran: implications for mantle wedge heterogeneity in a palaeo-subduction zone. Lithos.216–217, 352–369. 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.01.001
6
AgostiniS.DoglioniC.InnocentiF.ManettiP.TonariniS.SavasçinM. Y. (2007). The transition from subduction-related to intraplate Neogene magmatism in the Western Anatolia and Aegean area. New York, NY: Special Papers-Geological Society of America.
7
AhmadzadehG.JahangiriA.LentzD.MojtahediM. (2010). Petrogenesis of Plio-Quaternary post-collisional ultrapotassic volcanism in NW of Marand, NW Iran. J. Asian Earth Sci.39, 37–50. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.02.008
8
Al HumadiH.VäisänenM.IsmailS. A.KaraJ.O’BrienH.LahayeY.et al (2019). U–Pb geochronology and Hf isotope data from the Late Cretaceous Mawat ophiolite, NE Iraq. Heliyon.5, e02721. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02721
9
AlaviM. (1994). Tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: new data and interpretations. Tectonophysics229, 211–238. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90030-2
10
AldanmazE. (2006). Mineral-chemical constraints on the Miocene calc-alkaline and shoshonitic volcanic rocks of Western Turkey: disequilibrium phenocryst assemblages as indicators of magma storage and mixing conditions. Turk. J. Earth Sci.15, 47–73. 10.5194/se-11-125-2020
11
AliS. A.BuckmanS.AswadK. J.JonesB. G.IsmailS. A.NutmanA. P. (2013). The tectonic evolution of a Neo-Tethyan (Eocene-Oligocene) island-arc (Walash and Naopurdan groups) in the kurdistan region of the northeast Iraqi Zagros suture zone. Isl. Arc.22, 104–125. 10.1111/iar.12007
12
AliS. A.IsmailS. A.NutmanA. P.BennettV. C.JonesB. G.BuckmanS. (2016). The intra-oceanic Cretaceous (∼108 Ma) Kata-Rash arc fragment in the Kurdistan segment of Iraqi Zagros Suture Zone: implications for Neotethys evolution and closure. Lithos260, 154–163. 10.1016/j.lithos.2016.05.027
13
AlirezaeiS.HassanzadehJ. (2012). Geochemistry and zircon geochronology of the Permian a-type Hasanrobat granite, Sanandaj–Sirjan belt: a new record of the Gondwana break-up in Iran. Lithos151, 122–134. 10.1016/j.lithos.2011.11.015
14
AlishahF. P.JahangiriA.BranchS. (2013). Adakitic volcanism in Sahand region, northwest Iran: geochemical and geodynamic implications. Phys. Sci. Res. Int.1, 62–75. 10.1155/2013/735498
15
AllenM. B.KheirkhahM.NeillI.EmamiM. H.McLeodC. L. (2013a). Generation of arc andwithin-plate chemical signatures in collision zone magmatism: quaternary lavas from kurdistan province, Iran. J. Petrol.54, 887–911. 10.1093/petrology/egs090
16
AllenM. B.SavilleC.BlancE. J.-P.TalebianM.NissenE. (2013b). Orogenic plateau growth: expansion of the Turkish-Iranian Plateau across the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt. Tectonics32, 171–190. 10.1002/tect.20025
17
AlpaslanM.FreiR.BoztugD.KurtM. A.TemelA. (2004). Geochemical and Pb-Sr-Nd isotopic constraints indicating an enriched-mantle source for late cretaceous to early tertiary volcanism, central anatolia, Turkey. Int. Geol. Rev.46, 1022–1041. 10.2747/0020-6814.46.11.1022
18
AnY.HarrisonT. M. (2000). Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci.28, 211–280. 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.211
19
AnsariM. R.AbediniM. V.ZadehA. D.SheikhzakariaeeS. J.Mirzaee BeniZ. H. (2011). Geochemical constrain on the Early Cretaceous, OIB-type alkaline volcanic rocks in Kojor volcanic field, Central Alborz Mountain, north of Iran. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci.5, 913–925.
20
AnsariM. R. (2013). Geochemistry of mid cretaceous alkaline volcanic rocks, member of chaloos formation, Abbas Abad volcanic field, Central Alborz Mountains, North of Iran. Life Sci. J.10, 874–883. 10.1155/2013/735498
21
AshrafiN.JahangiriA.HasebeN.EbyG. N. (2018). Petrology, geochemistry and geodynamic setting of Eocene-Oligocene alkaline intrusions from the Alborz-Azerbaijan magmatic belt, NW Iran. Geochemistry78, 432–461. 10.1016/j.chemer.2018.10.004
22
AsiabanhaA.BardintzeffJ. M.VeysiS. (2018). North Qorveh volcanic field, western Iran: eruption styles, petrology and geological setting. Mineral. Petrol.112, 501–520. 10.1007/s00710-017-0541-z
23
AsiabanhaA.FodenJ. (2012). Post-collisional transition from an extensional volcano-sedimentary basin to a continental arc in the Alborz Ranges, N-Iran. Lithos148, 98–111. 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.05.014
24
AziziH.AsaharaY.TsuboiM. (2014a). Quaternary high-Nb basalts: existence of young oceanic crust under the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, NW Iran. Int. Geol. Rev.56, 167–186. 10.1080/00206814.2013.821268
25
AziziH.AsaharaY.TsuboiM.TakemuraK.RazyaniS. (2014b). The role of heterogenetic mantle in the genesis of adakites northeast of Sanandaj, northwestern Iran. Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry74, 87–97. 10.1016/j.chemer.2013.09.008
26
AziziH.ChungS. L.TanakaT.AsaharaY. (2011). Isotopic dating of the Khoy metamorphic complex (KMC), northwestern Iran: a significant revision of the formation age and magma source. Precambrian Res.185, 87–94. 10.1016/j.precamres.2010.12.004
27
AziziH.HadadS.SternR. J.AsaharaY. (2019). Age, geochemistry, and emplacement of the ∼40 Ma Baneh granite–appinite complex in a transpressional tectonic regime, Zagros suture zone, northwest Iran. Int. Geol. Rev.61, 195–223. 10.1080/00206814.2017.1422394
28
AziziH.HadiA.AsaharaY.MohammadY. O. Y. (2013). Geochemistry and geodynamics of the Mawat mafic complex in the Zagros Suture zone, northeast Iraq. Cent. Eur. J. Geosci.5, 523–537. 10.2478/s13533-012-0151-6
29
AziziH.JahangiriA. (2008). Cretaceous subduction–related volcanism in the northern Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, Iran. J. Geodyn.45, 178–190. 10.1016/j.jog.2007.11.001
30
AziziH.LucciF.SternR. J.HasannejadS.AsaharaY. (2018a). The Late Jurassic Panjeh submarine volcano in the northern Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone, northwest Iran: mantle plume or active margin?. Lithos308 (309), 364–380. 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.03.019
31
AziziH.MehrabiB.AkbarpourA. (2009). Genesis of tertiary magnetite-apatite deposits, Southeast of Zanjan, Iran. Resour. Geol.59, 330–341. 10.1111/j.1751-3928.2009.00101.x
32
AziziH.MoinevaziriH. (2009). Review of the tectonic setting of Cretaceous to Quaternary volcanism in northwestern Iran. J. Geodyn.47, 167–179. 10.1016/j.jog.2008.12.002
33
AziziH.NouriF.SternR. J.AziziM.LucciF.AsaharaY.et al (2018b). New evidence for Jurassic continental rifting in the northern Sanandaj Sirjan Zone, western Iran: the Ghalaylan seamount, southwest Ghorveh. Int. Geol. Rev.68, 142. 10.1080/00206814.2018.1535913
34
AziziH.SternR. J. (2019). Jurassic igneous rocks of the central Sanandaj–Sirjan zone (Iran) mark a propagating continental rift, not a magmatic arc. Terra. Nova.31, 415–423. 10.1111/ter.12404
35
BadrA.DavoudianA. R.ShabanianN.AziziH.AsaharaY.NeubauerF.et al (2018). A- and I-type metagranites from the north shahrekord metamorphic complex, Iran: evidence for early paleozoic post-collisional magmatism. Lithos300–301, 86–104. 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.12.008
36
CastroA.AghazadehM.BadrzadehZ.ChichorroM. (2013). Late Eocene–Oligocene post-collisional monzonitic intrusions from the Alborz magmatic belt, NW Iran. An example of monzonite magma generation from a metasomatized mantle source. Lithos180–181, 109–127. 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.08.003
37
ChiuH. Y.ChungS. L.ZarrinkoubM. H.MohammadiS. S.KhatibM. M.IizukaY. (2013). Zircon U-Pb age constraints from Iran on the magmatic evolution related to Neotethyan subduction and Zagros orogeny. Lithos162 (163), 70–87. 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.01.006
38
DabiriR.EmamiM.MollaeiH.ChenB.AbediniM.OmranN.et al (2011). Quaternary post-collision alkaline volcanism NW of Ahar (NW Iran): geochemical constraints of fractional crystallization process. Geol. Carpathica.62, 547–562. 10.2478/v10096-011-0039-2
39
DavoudianA. R.GenserJ.DachsE.ShabanianN. (2008). Petrology of eclogites from north of shahrekord, sanandaj-sirjan zone, Iran. Mineral. Petrol.92, 393–413. 10.1007/s00710-007-0204-6
40
DefantM. J.DrummondM. S. (1990). Derivation of some modern arc magmas by melting of young subducted lithosphere. Nature347, 662–665. 10.1038/347662a0
41
DeweyJ. F.PitmanW. C.RyanW. B. F.BonninJ. (1973). Plate tectonics and the evolution of the alpine system. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.84, 3137. 10.1130/0016-7606(1973)84<3137:PTATEO>2.0.CO;2
42
DilekY.AltunkaynakŞ. (2009). Geochemical and temporal evolution of Cenozoic magmatism in Western Turkey: mantle response to collision, slab break-off, and lithospheric tearing in an orogenic belt. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ.311, 213–233. 10.1144/SP311.8
43
DilekY.ImamverdiyevN.AltunkaynakŞ. (2010). Geochemistry and tectonics of Cenozoic volcanism in the Lesser Caucasus (Azerbaijan) and the peri-Arabian region: collision-induced mantle dynamics and its magmatic fingerprint. Int. Geol. Rev.52, 536–578. 10.1080/00206810903360422
44
DorooziR.VaccaroC.MasoudiF.PetriniR. (2016). Cretaceous alkaline volcanism in south Marzanabad, northern central Alborz, Iran: geochemistry and petrogenesis. Geosci. Front.7, 937–951. 10.1016/j.gsf.2015.11.004
45
FrostB. R.BarnesC. G.CollinsW. J.ArculusR. J.EllisD. J.FrostC. D. (2001). A geochemical classification for granitic rocks. J. Petrol.42, 2033–2048. 10.1093/petrology/42.11.2033
46
GöncüogluM. C. (2010). Introduction to the geology of Turkey: geodynamic evolution of the Pre-Alpine and Alpine terrances. NewYork, NY: Springer, 1–69.
47
GhaffariM.Rashidnejad-OmranN.DabiriR.ChenB.SantosJ. F. (2013). Mafic–intermediate plutonic rocks of the Salmas area, northwestern Iran: their source and petrogenesis significance. Int. Geol. Rev.55, 2016–2029. 10.1080/00206814.2013.817067
48
GhalamghashJ.SchmittA. K.ChaharlangR. (2019). Age and compositional evolution of Sahand volcano in the context of post-collisional magmatism in northwestern Iran: evidence for time-transgressive magmatism away from the collisional suture. Lithos344–345, 265–279. 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.06.031
49
GhasemiA.TalbotC. J. (2006). A new tectonic scenario for the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone (Iran). J. Asian Earth Sci.26, 683–693. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.01.003
50
GhaziA. M.PessagnoE. A.HassanipakA. A.KariminiaS. M.DuncanR. A.BabaieH. A. (2003). Biostratigraphic zonation and 40Ar–39Ar ages for the Neotethyan Khoy ophiolite of NW Iran. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol193, 311–323. 10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00234-7
51
GolonkaJ. (2004). Plate tectonic evolution of the southern margin of Eurasia in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Tectonophysics381, 235–273. 10.1016/j.tecto.2002.06.004
52
Haghighi BardinehS. N.Zarei SahamiehR.ZamanianH.Ahmadi KhalajiA. (2018). Geochemical, Sr-Nd isotopic investigations and U-Pb zircon chronology of the Takht granodiorite, west Iran: evidence for post-collisional magmatism in the northern part of the Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic assemblage. J. Afr. Earth Sci.139, 354–366. 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.12.030
53
HaghnazarS.MalakotianS. (2009). Petrography and Geochemistry of the Javaherdasht basalts (east of Guilan Province): the investigation of the role of crystal fractionation and crustal contamination in the magmatic evolution. Mineral. Iran. J. Crystallogr. Mineral88, 253–266. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90030-2
54
HaghnazarS.ShafeieZ.SharghyZ. 2 (2016). Petrogenesis and tectonic setting of an basalt-Trachyte-Rhyolite suite in the Spilli area (south of Siahkal), north of Iran: evidences of continental rift-related bimodal magmatism in Alborz. Ranian J. Petrol.27, 43–60. 10.22108/ijp.2016.21017
55
HajialioghliR.MoazzenM.JahangiriA.OberhänsliR.MocekB.AltenbergerU. (2011). Petrogenesis and tectonic evolution of metaluminous sub-alkaline granitoids from the Takab complex, NW Iran. Geol. Mag.148, 250–268. 10.1017/S0016756810000683
56
HassanipakA. A.GhaziA. M. (2000). Petrology, geochemistry and tectonic setting of the Khoy ophiolite, northwest Iran: implications for Tethyan tectonics. J. Asian Earth Sci.18, 109–121. 10.1016/S1367-9120(99)00023-1
57
HassanzadehJ.WernickeB. P. (2016). The Neotethyan Sanandaj-Sirjan zone of Iran as an archetype for passive margin-arc transitions. Tectonics.35, 586–621. 10.1002/2015TC003926
58
IsmailS. A.MirzaT. M.CarrP. F. (2010). Platinum-group elements geochemistry in podiform chromitites and associated peridotites of the mawat ophiolite , northeastern Iraq. J. Asian Earth Sci.37, 31–41. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2009.07.005
59
Jafari SoughR.AsiabanhaA.NasrabadiM. (2018). Geochemistry of Cretaceous hydromagmatic lava flows in Separdeh district, NE Qazvin, central Alborz. Ranian J. Crystallogr. Mineral.26, 717–732. http://ijcm.ir/article-1-1154-fa.html.
60
JahangiriA. (2007). Post-collisional Miocene adakitic volcanism in NW Iran: geochemical and geodynamic implications. J. Asian Earth Sci.30, 433–447. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.11.008
61
JassimS. Z.GoffJ. C. (2006). Geology of Iraq. DOLIN, sro, distributed. London, UK: Geological Society of London.
62
KarimK. H.Al-BidryM. (2020). Zagros metamorphic core complex: example from bulfat mountain, qala diza area, kurdistan region, northeast Iraq. Jordan J. Earth Environ. Sci.11, 113–125
63
Khalatbari-JafariM.JuteauT.BellonH.EmamiH. (2003). Discovery of two ophiolite complexes of different ages in the Khoy area (NW Iran). Compt. Rendus Geosci.335, 917–929. 10.1016/S1631-0713(03)00123-8
64
Khalatbari-JafariM.JuteauT.BellonH.WhitechurchH.CottenJ.EmamiH. (2004). New geological, geochronological and geochemical investigations on the Khoy ophiolites and related formations, NW Iran. J. Asian Earth Sci.23, 507–535. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2003.07.005
65
KheirkhahM.AllenM. B.EmamiM. (2009). Quaternary syn-collision magmatism from the Iran/Turkey borderlands. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.182, 1–12. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.01.026
66
KheirkhahM.NeillI.AllenM. B.AjdariK. (2013). Small-volume melts of lithospheric mantle during continental collision: late Cenozoic lavas of Mahabad, NW Iran. J. Asian Earth Sci.74, 37–49. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.06.002
67
KronerU.RomerR. L. (2013). Two plates - many subduction zones: the Variscan orogeny reconsidered. Gondwana Res.24, 298–329. 10.1016/j.gr.2013.03.001
68
Le BasM.MaitreR.StreckeisenA.ZanettinB. (1986). A chemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total alkali-silica diagram. J. Petrol.27, 745–750. 10.1093/petrology/27.3.745
69
LechmannA.BurgJ.-P. P.UlmerP.MohammadiA.GuillongM.FaridiM. (2018). From Jurassic rifting to Cretaceous subduction in NW Iranian Azerbaijan: geochronological and geochemical signals from granitoids. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.173, 102. 10.1007/s00410-018-1532-8
70
MahmoudiS.CorfuF.MasoudiF.MehrabiB.MohajjelM. (2011). U-Pb dating and emplacement history of granitoid plutons in the northern Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone, Iran. J. Asian Earth Sci.41, 238–249. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.03.006
71
ManafiM.ArianM.RaeesiS. H. T.SolgiA. (2013). Tethys subduction history in Caucasus region. Open J. Geol.03, 222–232. 10.4236/ojg.2013.33026
72
MazhariS. A.AminiS.GhalamghashJ.BeaF. (2011). Petrogenesis of granitic unit of naqadeh complex, Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, NW Iran. Arab. J. Geosci.4, 59–67. 10.1007/s12517-009-0077-6
73
MazhariS. A.BeaF.AminiS.GhalamghashJ.MolinaJ. F.MonteroP.et al (2009). The Eocene bimodal Piranshahr massif of the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone, NW Iran: a marker of the end of the collision in the Zagros orogen. J. Geol. Soc. London166, 53–69. 10.1144/0016-76492008-022
74
MehrabiB.SianiM. G. M. G.GoldfarbR.AziziH.GanerodM.MarshE. E. (2016). Mineral assemblages, fluid evolution, and genesis of polymetallic epithermal veins, Glojeh district, NW Iran. Ore Geol. Rev.78, 41–57. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.03.016
75
MiyazakiT.HanyuT.KimuraJ.-I.SendaR.VaglarovB. S.ChangQ.et al (2018). Clinopyroxene and bulk rock Sr–Nd–Hf–Pb isotope compositions of Raivavae ocean island basalts: does clinopyroxene record early stage magma chamber processes?. Chem. Geol.482, 18–31. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.12.015
76
MoghadamH. S.GhorbaniG.KhedrM. Z.FazlniaN.ChiaradiaM.EyubogluY.et al (2014). Late Miocene K-rich volcanism in the eslamieh peninsula (saray), NW Iran: implications for geodynamic evolution of the Turkish–Iranian high plateau. Gondwana Res.26, 1028–1050. 10.1016/j.gr.2013.09.015
77
MoghadamH. S.SternR. J. (2015). Ophiolites of Iran: keys to understanding the tectonic evolution of SW Asia: (II) Mesozoic ophiolites. J. Asian Earth Sci.100, 31–59. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.12.016
78
MohammadY. O.CornellD. H. (2017). U–Pb zircon geochronology of the Daraban leucogranite, Mawat ophiolite, Northeastern Iraq: a record of the subduction to collision history for the Arabia–Eurasia plates. Isl. Arc.26, e12188. 10.1111/iar.12188
79
MohammadY. O. (2013). P–T evolution of meta-peridotite in the Penjwin ophiolite, northeastern Iraq. Arab. J. Geosci.6, 505–518. 10.1007/s12517-011-0372-x
80
MoritzR.RezeauH.OvtcharovaM.TayanR.MelkonyanR.HovakimyanS.et al (2016). Long-lived, stationary magmatism and pulsed porphyry systems during Tethyan subduction to post-collision evolution in the southernmost Lesser Caucasus, Armenia and Nakhitchevan. Gondwana Res.37, 465–503. 10.1016/j.gr.2015.10.009
81
NeillI.MeliksetianK.AllenM. B.NavasardyanG.KuiperK. (2015). Petrogenesis of mafic collision zone magmatism: the Armenian sector of the Turkish-Iranian Plateau. Chem. Geol.403. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.013
82
NouriF.AsaharaY.AziziH.TsuboiM. (2019). Petrogenesis of the Harsin–Sahneh serpentinized peridotites along the Zagros suture zone, western Iran: new evidence for mantle metasomatism due to oceanic slab flux. Geol. Mag.156, 772–800. 10.1017/S0016756818000201
83
NouriF.AsaharaY.AziziH.YamamotoK.TsuboiM. (2017). Geochemistry and petrogensis of the Eocene back arc mafic rocks in the Zagros suture zone, northern Noorabad, western Iran. Chemie der Erde Geochem.77, 517–533. 10.1016/j.chemer.2017.06.002
84
NouriF.AziziH.AsaharaY.SternR. J. (2020). A new perspective on Cenozoic calc-alkaline and shoshonitic volcanic rocks, eastern Saveh (central Iran). Int. Geol. Rev.17, 185. 10.1080/00206814.2020.1718005
85
NouriF.AziziH.GolonkaJ.AsaharaY.OrihashiY.YamamotoK.et al (2016). Age and petrogenesis of Na-rich felsic rocks in western Iran: evidence for closure of the southern branch of the Neo-Tethys in the Late Cretaceous. Tectonophysics671, 151–172. 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.12.014
86
ParlakO.HÖckV.DelaloyeM. (2000). Suprasubduction zone origin of the pozanti-karsanti ophiolite (southern Turkey) deduced from whole-rock and mineral chemistry of the gabbroic cumulates. Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ.173, 219–234. 10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.173.01.11
87
PearceJ. A. (2008). Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust. Lithos100, 14–48. 10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.016
88
PearceJ. A.HarrisonN. B. W.TindelA. G. (1984). Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic Iinterpretation of granitic rocks. J. Petrol.25, 956–983. 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956
89
PearceJ. A. (1982). “Trace element characteristics of lavas from destructive plate boundaries”, in In andesites: orogenic andesites and related rocks. ( New York, NY: Wiley), 525–548
90
PrelevićD.SeghediI. (2013). Magmatic response to the post-accretionary orogenesis within Alpine-Himalayan belt-Preface. Lithos180–181, 1–4. 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.09.004
91
RabieeA.RossettiF.TecceF.AsaharaY.AziziH.GlodnyJ.et al (2019). Multiphase magma intrusion, ore-enhancement and hydrothermal carbonatisation in the Siah-Kamar porphyry Mo deposit, Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic zone, NW Iran. Ore Geol. Rev.110, 102930. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.05.016
92
RaninA.SepahiA. A.Moein-VaziriH.AlianiF. (2010). Petrology and geochemistry of the plutonic complexes of the Marivan area, Sanandaj-Sirjan zone (In Farsi with English abstract). Petrology, 22, 43–60.
93
SahakyanL.BoschD.SossonM.AvagyanA.GaloyanG.RollandY.et al (2017). Geochemistry of the Eocene magmatic rocks from the Lesser Caucasus area (Armenia): evidence of a subduction geodynamic environment. Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ.428, 73–98. 10.1144/SP428.12
94
SclaterJ. G.AndersonR. N.BellM. L. (1971). Elevation of ridges and evolution of the central eastern Pacific. J. Geophys. Res.76, 7888–7915. 10.1029/jb076i032p07888
95
ShabanianN.DavoudianA. R.DongY.LiuX. (2018). U-Pb zircon dating, geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic ratios from Azna-Dorud Cadomian metagranites, Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone of western Iran. Precambrian Res.306, 41–60. 10.1016/j.precamres.2017.12.037
96
Shafaii MoghadamH.CorfuF.SternR. J.Lotfi BakhshA. (2019). The eastern Khoy metamorphic complex of NW Iran: a jurassic ophiolite or continuation of the sanandaj–sirjan zone. J. Geol. Soc. London177, 517–529. 10.1144/jgs2018-081
97
Shafaii MoghadamH.GriffinW. L.KirchenbaurM.Garbe-SchönbergD.Zakie KhedrM.KimuraJ.-I.et al (2018). Roll-back, extension and mantle upwelling triggered Eocene potassic magmatism in NW Iran. J. Petrol.59, 1417–1465. 10.1093/petrology/egy067
98
Shafaii MoghadamH.SternR. J. (2014). Ophiolites of Iran: keys to understanding the tectonic evolution of SW Asia: (I) Paleozoic ophiolites. J. Asian Earth Sci.91, 19–38. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.04.008
99
ShervaisJ. W. (1982). Ti-V plots and the petrogenesis of modern and ophiolitic lavas. Earth Planet Sci. Lett.59, 101–118. 10.1016/0012-821X(82)90120-0
100
SianiM. G.MehrabiB.AziziH.WilkinsonC. M.GanerodM. (2015). Geochemistry and geochronology of the volcano-plutonic rocks associated with the Glojeh epithermal gold mineralization, NW Iran. Open Geosci.7. 10.1515/geo-2015-0024
101
StöcklinJ.NabaviM. H. (1973). Tectonic map of Iran, scale 1:2,500,000. Tehran: Geological Survey of Iran.
102
SunS. S.McDonoughW. F. (1989). Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ.42, 313–345. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19
103
TakiS. (2017). The role of fractional crystallization in the evolution of magma of the Upper Cretaceous volcanic and subvolcanic rocks from the Nageleh Sar Syncline, south Mahmood Abad, North Iran. Iran. J. Crystallogr. Mineral.25, 50–522. 10.1029/2010TC002809
104
Temizelİ.ArslanM.YücelC.YazarE. A.KaygusuzA.AslanZ. (2019). U-Pb geochronology, bulk-rock geochemistry and petrology of Late Cretaceous syenitic plutons in the Gölköy (Ordu) area (NE Turkey): implications for magma generation in a continental arc extension triggered by slab roll-back. J. Asian Earth Sci.171, 305–320. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.01.004
105
TianS. H.YangZ. Sen.HouZ. Q.MoX. X.HuW. J.ZhaoY.et al (2017). Subduction of the Indian lower crust beneath southern Tibet revealed by the post-collisional potassic and ultrapotassic rocks in SW Tibet. Gondwana Res.41, 29–50. 10.1016/j.gr.2015.09.005
106
TopuzG.AltherrR.SatirM.SchwarzW. H. (2004). Low-grade metamorphic rocks from the Pulur complex, NE Turkey: implications for the pre-Liassic evolution of the Eastern Pontides. Int. J. Earth Sci.93, 72–91. 10.1007/s00531-003-0372-5
107
TopuzG.CandanO.ZackT.YılmazA. (2017). East Anatolian plateau constructed over a continental basement: no evidence for the East Anatolian accretionary complex. Geology.45, 791–794. 10.1130/G39111.1
108
TorkianA.FurmanT.SalehiN.VeloskiK. (2019). Petrogenesis of adakites from the Sheyda volcano, NW Iran. J. Afr. Earth Sci.150, 194–204. 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.11.014
109
TorkianA.SalehiN.SiebelW. (2016). Geochemistry and petrology of basaltic lavas from NE-Qorveh, Kurdistan province, Western Iran. Abhandlungen J. Mineral. Geochem.193, 95–128. 10.1127/njma/2016/0296
110
WhitechurchH.OmraniJ.AgardP.HumbertF.MontignyR.JolivetL. (2013). Evidence for Paleocene-Eocene evolution of the foot of the Eurasian margin (Kermanshah ophiolite, SW Iran) from back-arc to arc: implications for regional geodynamics and obduction. Lithos.182 (183), 11–32. 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.07.017
111
Wrobel-DaveauJ. C.RingenbachJ. C.TavakoliS.RuizG. M. H.MasseP.Frizon de LamotteD. (2010). Evidence for mantle exhumation along the Arabian margin in the Zagros (Kermanshah area, Iran). Arab. J. Geosci.3, 499–513. 10.1007/s12517-010-0209-z
112
ZaeimniaF.AraiS.MirmohammadiM. (2017). Na-rich character of metasomatic/metamorphic fluids inferred from preiswerkite in chromitite pods of the Khoy ophiolite in Iran: role of chromitites as capsules of trapped fluids. Lithos.268–271, 351–363. 10.1016/j.lithos.2016.11.021
113
ZhangZ.DongD.SunW.ZhangG.BaiY. (2020). Investigation of an oceanic plateau formation and rifting initiation model implied by the Caroline Ridge on the Caroline Plate, western Pacific. Int. Geol. Rev.71, 100. 10.1080/00206814.2019.1707126
114
ZhangZ.JiW.MajidifardM. R.RezaeianM.TalebianM.XiangD.et al (2018). Geochemistry, zircon U-Pb and Hf isotope for granitoids, NW Sanandaj-Sirjan zone, Iran: implications for Mesozoic-Cenozoic episodic magmatism during Neo-Tethyan lithospheric subduction. Gondwana Res.62, 227–245. 10.1016/j.gr.2018.04.002
Summary
Keywords
Van microplate, neotethys, Jurassic drifting, tethys ophiolites, NW Iran
Citation
Azizi H and Tsuboi M (2021) The Van Microplate: A New Microcontinent at the Junction of Iran, Turkey, and Armenia. Front. Earth Sci. 8:574385. doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.574385
Received
19 June 2020
Accepted
21 December 2020
Published
29 January 2021
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Mei-Fu Zhou, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Reviewed by
Simone Tommasini, University of Florence, Italy
Justin L. Payne, University of South Australia, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Azizi and Tsuboi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hossein Azizi, azizi1345@gmail.com, h.azizi@uok.ac.ir
This article was submitted to Petrology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.