Abstract
Alpine meadows are robust nitrous oxide (N2O) sources that continually experience overgrazing on the Tibetan Plateau. However, the mechanisms underlying N2O fluxes are poorly understood. The effects of grazing activity on grassland N2O emission rates, soil and plant characteristics were investigated using a meta-analysis approach. This study revealed that the effect size of grazing was 0.31 ± 0.08 on N2O emission rates (p < 0.0001), and N2O fluxes increased by 36.27% than control. Light, moderate, and high grazing increased N2O emission rates by 34.62, 19.48, and 62.16%, respectively. The effect size of moderate grazing was significantly lower than that of high grazing (p < 0.05). The effect size of grazing on pH was significant (p < 0.05), and pH increased by 6.51% compared with control. Both soil ammonia and nitrate levels increased by 12.24 and 8.60%, respectively. However, grazing decreased soil total carbon, total phosphorus, and available phosphorus by 14.4, 10.25, and 10.15%, respectively. Grazing significantly decreased plant diversity (p < 0.05), richness, and aboveground biomass by 15.16, 23.7, and 30.7% (p < 0.01), respectively (p < 0.01). Aboveground biomass significantly influenced effect size on N2O emissions, explaining 13.36% of the variations. The direct coefficient of aboveground biomass on effect sizes was −0.631 based on the structural equation model. Although grazing significantly decreased aboveground biomass and diversity, moderate grazing is optimal for mitigating N2O emissions on the Tibetan Plateau.
Introduction
Nitrous oxide (N2O) contributes 8% to global greenhouse gas emissions, and its warming potential is 310 times higher than that of carbon dioxide (IPCC, 2022). Terrestrial ecosystems release 16.8 Tg N2O yr−1 globally, accounting for approximately 60% of the total source intensity (Feyissa et al., 2021; Ma L. et al., 2021). Alpine meadows, covering more than 35% of the Tibetan plateau area, are a representative vegetation type and an important source of N2O (Gao et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2021).
Livestock grazing is a dominant economic activity on the Tibetan Plateau (Tang L. et al., 2019). Over-grazing has caused severe grassland degradation in more than 80% of the Tibetan Plateau over the last few decades and increased grassland N2O emission rates (Zhang et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2021; Hargreaves et al., 2021). Light, moderate, highly degraded, and control grassland N2O emission rates were 35.17, 53.40, 87.07, and 47.20 μg m−2 h−1, respectively, in an alpine meadow of the northeast Tibetan Plateau (Guo et al., 2019). Light and intensive grazing treatments increased alpine grassland N2O emissions by 27.5 and 68.1%, respectively, on the northwest Tibetan Plateau (Yin et al., 2020). Moderate grazing increased the annual average N2O emissions of alpine meadows by 62 and 65.79% on the northeast and southwest Tibetan Plateau, respectively (Zhu et al., 2015; Zhan et al., 2021). Moderate grazing and warming with grazing significantly increased the average annual N2O flux by 57.8 and 31.0%, respectively, on the northeast Tibetan Plateau (Hu et al., 2010). Thus, the effects of grazing on N2O emission rates showed robust spatial heterogeneity across the Tibetan Plateau.
Microbial communities were altered in post-grazing grassland soils and linked to soil biogeochemical processes, such as nitrification and denitrification, and N2O generation processes (Zhang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016). The grassland N2O emission rate is significantly negatively correlated with biomass, soil water-filled pore space, organic carbon, and soil available phosphorus (Du et al., 2019; Zhan et al., 2021). Heavy grazing reduces N2O emissions by nearly 40% because of reduction in soil moisture and substrate availability, such as soil dissolved organic carbon and inorganic N levels (Tang S. et al., 2019; Yao et al., 2019). However, no relationship was observed between the soil N2O emission rate and temperature or rainfall on the northeast Tibetan Plateau (Li et al., 2018).
The Tibetan Plateau covers approximately 25% of the total area in China, and it is very sensitive to anthropogenic perturbation (Du et al., 2019). Establishing a proper grazing intensity is urgently needed to reduce N2O emissions from degraded grasslands while maintaining livestock productivity. In this study, we have addressed the following hypotheses: First, grazing increases grassland N2O emission rates, especially at high grazing intensities. Second, the effect size of grazing on N2O emission rates is dominated by soil available nitrogen content and altitude.
Materials and Methods
Data Compilation
Published papers were collected using keywords “grazing” and “nitrous oxide or N2O” and “Tibet*” in Web of Science from January 1990 to April 2022. Furthermore, 49 articles were selected and conserved in the Endnote library (Endnote X9). Most full-version papers and doi numbers were automatically added by the function “find full text.” Others were captured through doi by using Google Scholar.
Then, complete articles were screened based on the following criteria: 1) all studies were conducted, including control and its grazing activity (light, moderate and high grazing). 2) N2O concentrations were analyzed using the static chamber method and chromatographic concentration analysis. Some data were extracted from published paper figures by using WebPlotDigitizer software. Here, we collated 21 published studies, including 40 field experiment results (Figure 1). Soil and plant characteristics were also recorded.
FIGURE 1
Main vegetation types and 40 research sites on the Tibetan plateau.
We calculated the log response ratios (RR, hereafter response ratios) as a measure of effect size. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A random-effect-model meta-analysis was performed, and the data were analyzed with R statistical software by using the Meta package.where Xe and Xc are the mean values of each individual trait measure in the treatment and control groups, respectively. In addition, lnR <0 indicated a decrease in trait response to grazing activity; otherwise, it indicated an increasing effect. The variance in lnR was calculated as follows:where Se, Ne, xe, Sc, Nc, and xc are standard deviations, sample sizes, and mean values of the grazing treatments and control, respectively.
The effect size of grazing on N2O emission rates, soil and plant characteristics, and CI were calculated based on the random-effect model:where vi represents the intra-study variance, and represents the inter-study variance.95% CI of average effect value: CI = ± 1.96 SE, and yi refers to the single study effect value.
Statistical Analysis
Meta-statistical analyses were performed using R 3.6.2, and a random-effect model of the meta-analysis was run in metafor1.9-8 (Benítez-López et al., 2017). The random-effect models were used to analyze the estimated values and standard errors (rma). Then, mixed-effect models (mods) were used to explain significant residual heterogeneity with different moderators, including categorical and continuous variables. The explained moderator heterogeneity statistic (Qm) was also calculated to test for significance in single covariate meta-regressions.
Drive factors of climate factors and soil characteristics for effect sizes were analyzed with the structural equation model using “piecewiseSEM” package. All figures were drawn using SigmaPlot 10.0 and R statistics.
Publication Bias
Biases against publishing negative results may exist in research fields. In this study, a regression test for funnel plot asymmetry of publication bias was performed using a mixed-effect meta-regression model (funnel and Egger’s test, rma).
Results
Responses of Alpine Meadow N2O Emission Rates, Soil, and Plant Characteristics to Grazing Activity
Grazing activities had a robust and positive effect on N2O emission rates (p < 0.0001, Table 1), with an estimated value of 0.31 ± 0.08 effect size (95% CI: 0.15–0.47). This indicated that grazing disturbance increased alpine meadow N2O emission rates by 36.27% on the Tibetan Plateau. Furthermore, high grazing activity significantly increased N2O emission rates by approximately 62.16% (p < 0.0001), and it was significantly higher than that of moderate grazing (p < 0.05, Table 1). Light and moderate grazing increased by 34.62 and 19.48%, respectively. Thus, moderate grazing is optimal for mitigating N2O emissions on the Tibetan Plateau.
TABLE 1
| Items | Effect Sizes | Increase Range (%) | 95% Confidence Interval | P | Df |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grazing activity | 0.31 ± 0.08 | 36.27 | 0.15–0.47 | <0.001*** | 39 |
| Light grazing | 0.29 ± 0.21 ab | 34.62 | −0.12 – 0.71 | 0.711 | 5 |
| Moderate grazing | 0.18 ± 0.12 b | 19.48 | −0.05 – 0.41 | 0.410 | 18 |
| High grazing | 0.48 ± 0.13 a | 62.16 | 0.22–0.75 | <0.001*** | 14 |
Effect sizes of grazing activities and intensities on grasslands N2O rates on Tibetan Plateau.
Note: effect sizes meant average ± stand error. Same letters meant no significant differences in the same column.
Grazing activity increased grassland soil ammonia and nitrate levels, pH, temperature, dissolved organic carbon, and moisture by 12.24, 8.60, 6.51, 5.33, 3.56, and 1.16%, respectively (Figure 2). The effect size of grazing on pH was significant (p < 0.05). However, grazing decreased soil total carbon, total phosphorus, available phosphorus, soil organic carbon, available potassium, total nitrogen, and bulk soil by 14.4, 10.25, 10.15, 6.57, 5.85, 4.3, and 1.97%, respectively. In addition, the effect size of available potassium was significant (p < 0.01, Figure 2). Grazing significantly decreased plant diversity (p < 0.05), richness, and aboveground biomass (p < 0.01) by 15.16, 23.7, and 30.7%, respectively (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
Effect sizes of grazing on soil (A) and plant (B) characteristic and ranges of increase and decrease on the Tibetan. Note: ** and * meant p < 0.01 and p < 0.05. DOC, TC, TP, AP, SOC, AK, TN meant dissolved organic carbon, total carbon, total phosphorus, available phosphorus, soil organic carbon, available kalium, and total nitrogen.
Effects of Factors on Grassland N2O Emission Rate Based on Explained Moderator Heterogeneity Statistic
Aboveground biomass significantly influenced the effect size based on test for moderators (p < 0.05, Table 2). The mixed-effect model results indicated that aboveground biomass could explain 13.36% of the variations in effect size, and the effect size decreased as the aboveground biomass increased. Furthermore, nitrate content and precipitation were the main factors that affected the effect sizes by approximately 4.49 and 3.18%, respectively (Table 2).
TABLE 2
| Moderators | Test of Moderators (QM) | P | Model | R2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomass | 5.36 | 0.02* | Y = 0.7374–0.0013 x | 13.36 |
| Nitrate | 2.06 | 0.145 | Y = 0.2031 + 0.0135 x | 4.49 |
| Precipitation | 2.12 | 0.151 | Y = 0.0009 x—0.2111 | 3.18 |
| SOC | 1.12 | 0.29 | Y = 0.4880–0.0072 x | 0.86 |
| Bulk | 0.66 | 0.42 | Y = 0.8278–0.5230 x | 0.01 |
| pH | 0.31 | 0.58 | Y = 0.7629–0.0750 x | 0.01 |
| Temperature | 0.06 | 0.81 | Y = 0.3124–0.0068 x | 0.01 |
Analysis of air temperature and altitude and other factors on effect size.
Note: Y means effect size. SOC, meant soil organic carbon.
Structural Equation Model of Direct and Indirect Effects on Grasslands Effect Sizes Among Different Factors
The effect size of grazing activity on N2O emission rates was mainly controlled by grassland aboveground biomass with a structural equation model. The direct coefficient of aboveground biomass on effect size was −0.631 (p < 0.05, Figure 3). The direct coefficients of temperature and precipitation on the effect sizes were 0.579 and −0.456, respectively. The indirect coefficients of precipitation, air temperature, and nitrate were −0.365, −0.311, and 0.153, respectively.
FIGURE 3
Driven factors on effect size and biomass and nitrate through structural equation model. Note: Tem and Pre meant air temperature and precipitation. Solid and dashed lines meant positive and negative effect. * meant p < 0.05.
FIGURE 4
Funnel plot of effect sizes of grazing on grassland N2O emission rates. Note: Egger’s regression test for funnel plot asymmetry (z = 0.0862, p = 0.9313).
Publication Bias Analysis of Effect Sizes on Grassland N2O Emissions
Egger’s regression test for funnel plot asymmetry indicated that this result was not significantly affected by publication bias by using meta-analysis models (z = 0.0862, p = 0.9313, Figure 4).
Discussion
Effects of Grazing on Grassland N2O Emission Rates on the Tibetan Plateau
The average global temperature in 2021 was approximately 1.11°C above pre-industrial levels, and atmospheric N2O was 333.2 ppb, approximately 123% of pre-industrial levels (WMO, 2021). Grassland N2O emission rates increased by 5.05% because of nitrogen excreted by grazing animals in Europe (Oenema et al., 1997). In South Brazil, grazing increased grassland N2O emission rates from 5.54 to 15.83 μg m−2 h−1 (Schirmann et al., 2019). Across the Tibetan Plateau, grazing treatments increased N2O emissions from 5.42 to 266.71% (Lin et al., 2009; Ma S. et al., 2021). Light grazing increased N2O emission rates by 5.40–63.91% (Guo et al., 2019; Luo et al., 2020), and extreme grazing decreased N2O emission rates by 28.57% on the central Tibetan Plateau (Wei et al., 2012). The opposite effect and strong heterogeneity across different studies were because of different aboveground biomass, soil organic carbon content, air temperature and precipitation (Yao et al., 2019; Feyissa et al., 2021). Grazing increased soil N2O emissions by regulating nirK and nosZ denitrifiers in alpine meadows (Zhang et al., 2021).
In the present study, we found that grazing increased alpine meadow emission rates by 36.27% on the Tibetan Plateau. As the grazing intensity increased, the influence on extent of emission first decreased from 34.62% (light) to 19.48% (moderate) and then increased by approximately 62.16% (high grazing). The effect was the lowest for moderate grazing, which was revealed to significantly increase grassland biomass and diversity on the northeast and southeast Tibetan Plateau (Zhu et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2017; Ma L. et al., 2021).
There are three reasons for this increased effect of grazing on N2O emission rates on the Tibetan Plateau. First, grazing activities increased available nitrate and pH in grassland soils, providing adequate substrate and suitable environments for N2O production. In this study, we also found that grazing increased soil ammonia and nitrate by 12.24 and 8.60%, respectively. Second, grazing livestock provide a lot of dung and urine to grassland soils. Ruminants may excrete 75–95% of the consumed nitrogen to grasslands (Feyissa et al., 2021). The feeding and trampling behaviors of grazing animals and their excreta can directly or indirectly increase soil emissions of N2O (Ma S. et al., 2021). Cumulative N2O emissions for both urine and dung patches were 1.8–3.7 times greater than those of control plots in alpine meadows (Lin et al., 2009). Third, grazing significantly decreased grassland biomass and richness by 30.70 and 23.70%, respectively, on the Tibetan Plateau. This reduction in aboveground biomass and richness increased the competition priority of microorganisms. Subsequently, N2O emission rates significantly increased on the Tibetan Plateau.
Influence Mechanism of Grazing on Grassland N2O Emission and Mitigation on the Tibetan Plateau
Limiting warming to around 1.5°C in the Paris Agreement requires global greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced by 43% by 2030 (WMO, 2021), and N2O should be reduced by 20% (IPCC, 2022).
Grazing activity has significant effects on plant communities and soil properties (Feyissa et al., 2021). Heavy grazing intensity accelerated N cycling rates and increased plant-soil system N in the alpine meadow (Zhong et al., 2017). In this study, we revealed that the effect size of grazing on N2O fluxes was driven by aboveground biomass, with a direct coefficient of −0.631 based on the structural equation model. Furthermore, aboveground biomass could explain 13.36% of the variations in effect size by using the mixed-effect model. Thus, an increase in grassland aboveground biomass would help to significantly mitigate N2O emission rates on the Tibetan Plateau.
Different vegetation types affected grassland N2O emission rates; emission rates in Kobresia humilis and Potentilla fruticosa meadows were 47.8 and 60.6 μg m−2 h−1, respectively (Du et al., 2008). N2O is mainly driven by the simultaneous effects of grassland biomass and soil temperature on the Tibetan Plateau (Lin et al., 2009). N2O fluxes were significantly positively correlated to soil nitrate content, organic carbon, and biomass (Yao et al., 2019). Soil temperature and biomass are the major contributors to alpine meadow N2O fluxes on the northwest Tibetan Plateau (Yin et al., 2020). Grassland denitrification genes increased when biomass was higher, which was concomitant with increased N2O emissions (Wang et al., 2016; Tang L. et al., 2019).
Conclusion
In summary, alpine meadows are atmospheric N2O sources on the Tibetan Plateau. Grazing activity significantly increased alpine meadow N2O emission rates. Increased range of effect size on N2O emission rates was high grazing, light grazing, and moderate grazing in sequence. Moderate grazing was found to be optimal for mitigating N2O emissions. Grazing significantly increased soil pH but decreased soil available potassium. Grazing significantly decreased grassland coverage, richness, and biodiversity. The effect size of grazing on N2O emission was driven by aboveground biomass. The increase in aboveground grassland biomass is beneficial for mitigating N2O emissions on the Tibetan Plateau.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
WL: conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, and project administration. QX: methodology and resources, and validation. HZ: formal analysis, investigation, and data curation. YD: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work is supported by supported by national natural science foundation of China (U21A20186), leading talents of the Kunlun talents in Qinghai Province, CAS “Light of West China” for interdisciplinary innovation team, key development, and transformation projects in Qinghai Province (2022-NK-135), and forest monitoring sample plot of Qilian Mountains (QHTX2021010).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Benítez-LópezA.AlkemadeR.SchipperA. M.IngramD. J.VerweijP. A.EikelboomJ. A. J.et al (2017). The Impact of Hunting on Tropical Mammal and Bird Populations. Science356 (6334), 180–183. 10.1126/science.aaj1891
2
DuY.CuiY.XuX.LiangD.LongR.CaoG. (2008). Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Two Alpine Meadows in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Plant Soil311 (1-2), 245–254. 10.1007/s11104-008-9727-9
3
DuY.ShuK.GuoX.PengjinZ. (2019). Moderate Grazing Promotes Grassland Nitrous Oxide Emission by Increasing Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea Abundance on the Tibetan Plateau. Curr. Microbiol.76 (5), 620–625. 10.1007/s00284-019-01668-x
4
FeyissaA.YangF.WuJ.ChenQ.ZhangD.ChengX. (2021). Soil Nitrogen Dynamics at a Regional Scale along a Precipitation Gradient in Secondary Grassland of China. Sci. Total Environ.781, 146736. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146736
5
FuB.OuyangZ.ShiP.FanJ.WangX.ZhengH.et al (2021). Current Condition and Protection Strategies of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Ecological Security Barrier. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci.36 (11), 1298–1306.
6
GaoY. H.LuoP.WuN.ChenH.WangG. X. (2008). Impacts of Grazing Intensity on Nitrogen Pools and Nitrogen Cycle in an Alpine Meadow on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Appl. Ecol. Env. Res.6 (3), 69–79. 10.15666/aeer/0603_069079
7
GuoX.DaiL.LiY.ZhangF.LinL.LiQ.et al (2019). Major Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Different Degradation Levels of Alpine Meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Res. Soil . Water Conser.26 (5), 188–194.
8
HargreavesP. R.BakerK. L.GracesonA.BonnettS. A. F.BallB. C.CloyJ. M. (2021). Use of a Nitrification Inhibitor Reduces Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Emissions from Compacted Grassland with Different Soil Textures and Climatic Conditions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.310, 107307. 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107307
9
HuY.ChangX.LinX.WangY.WangS.DuanJ.et al (2010). Effects of Warming and Grazing on N2O Fluxes in an Alpine Meadow Ecosystem on the Tibetan Plateau. Soil Biol. Biochem.42 (6), 944–952. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.011
10
HuY.ZhangZ.WangS. (2017). The Weak Effects of Fencing on Ecosystem Respiration, CH4, and N2O Fluxes in a Tibetan Alpine Meadow during the Growing Season. Sci. Cold Arid. Reg.9 (6), 554–567.
11
IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change IPCC-AR6-WGIII Full Report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press.
12
LiH.WeiY.HeH.YangY.LiY. (2018). Effects of Grazing Density on Nitrous Oxide Effluxes in Alpine Kobresia Humilis Meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Chin. J. Agrome.39 (1), 27–33. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2018.01.004
13
LinX.WangS.MaX.XuG.LuoC.LiY.et al (2009). Fluxes of CO2, CH4, and N2O in an Alpine Meadow Affected by Yak Excreta on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau during Summer Grazing Periods. Soil Biol. Biochem.41 (4), 718–725. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.01.007
14
LuoC.WangS.ZhangL.WilkesA.ZhaoL.ZhaoX.et al (2020). CO2, CH4 and N2O Fluxes in an Alpine Meadow on the Tibetan Plateau as Affected by N-Addition and Grazing Exclusion. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst117 (1), 29–42. 10.1007/s10705-020-10062-0
15
MaL.ZhangW.ZhengX.YaoZ.ZhangH.WangR.et al (2021). Attempt to Correct Grassland N2O Fluxes Biased by the DN-Based Opaque Static Chamber Measurement. Atmos. Environ.264, 118687. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118687
16
MaS.FanJ.ChenY.LuX. (2021). Studying Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Interactions between Phospholipid Fatty Acid Content and Soil Properties of Alpine Grassland Soil in Northern Tibet, China. Glob. Ecol. Conservation27, e01558–32. 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01558
17
OenemaO.VelthofG. L.YamulkiS.JarvisS. C. (1997). Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Grazed Grassland. Soil Use Manag.13 (4), 288–295. 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1997.tb00600.x
18
SchirmannJ.BastosD. F. D.WeilerD. A.VelosoM. G.DieckowJ.CarvalhoP. C. d. F.et al (2020). Nitrous Oxide Emission Factor from Cattle Urine and Dung in Native Grassland of the Pampa Biome, South Brazil. Soil Res.58, 198. 10.1071/SR19095
19
TangL.ZhongL.XueK.WangS.XuZ.LinQ.et al (2019). Warming Counteracts Grazing Effects on the Functional Structure of the Soil Microbial Community in a Tibetan Grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem.134, 113–121. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.02.018
20
TangS.WangK.XiangY.TianD.WangJ.LiuY.et al (2019). Heavy Grazing Reduces Grassland Soil Greenhouse Gas Fluxes: A Global Meta-Analysis. Sci. Total Environ.654, 1218–1224. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.082
21
WangJ.LuoY.QuanQ.MaF.TianD.ChenW.et al (2021). Effects of Warming and Clipping on CH4 and N2O Fluxes in an Alpine Meadow. Agric. For. Meteorology297, 108278. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108278
22
WangM.WangS.WuL.XuD.LinQ.HuY.et al (2016). Evaluating the Lingering Effect of Livestock Grazing on Functional Potentials of Microbial Communities in Tibetan Grassland Soils. Plant Soil407 (1-2), 385–399. 10.1007/s11104-016-2897-y
23
WeiD.-RiX.WangY.WangY.LiuY.YaoT. (2012). Responses of CO2, CH4 and N2O Fluxes to Livestock Exclosure in an Alpine Steppe on the Tibetan Plateau, China. Plant Soil359 (1), 45–55. 10.1007/s11104-011-1105-3
24
WMO (2021). State of the Global Climate 2021. Geneva, Switzerland: World meteorological organization.
25
YaoZ.MaL.ZhangH.ZhengX.WangK.ZhuB.et al (2019). Characteristics of Annual Greenhouse Gas Flux and NO Release from Alpine Meadow and Forest on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Agric. For. Meteorology272-273, 166–175. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.04.007
26
YinM.GaoX.TenutaM.LiL.GuiD.LiX.et al (2020). Enhancement of N2O Emissions by Grazing Is Related to Soil Physicochemical Characteristics rather Than Nitrifier and Denitrifier Abundances in Alpine Grassland. Geoderma375, 114511. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114511
27
ZhanW.YangZ.LiuJ.ChenH.YangG.ZhuE.et al (2021). Effect of Grazing Intensities on Soil N2O Emissions from an Alpine Meadow of Zoige Plateau in China. Atmosphere12 (5), 54–59. 10.3390/atmos12050541
28
ZhangL.WangX.WangJ.WanQ.LiaoL.LiuG.et al (2021). Grazing Exclusion Reduces Soil N2O Emissions by Regulating nirK- and nosZ-type Denitrifiers in Alpine Meadows. J. Soils Sediments21 (12), 3753–3769. 10.1007/s11368-021-03035-5
29
ZhangW.LiuC.ZhengX.FuY.HuX.CaoG.et al (2014). The Increasing Distribution Area of Zokor Mounds Weaken Greenhouse Gas Uptakes by Alpine Meadows in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Soil Biol. Biochem.71, 105–112. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.005
30
ZhongL.ZhouX.WangY.LiF. Y.ZhouS.BaiY.et al (2017). Mixed Grazing and Clipping Is Beneficial to Ecosystem Recovery but May Increase Potential N2O Emissions in a Semi-arid Grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem.114, 42–51. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.002
31
ZhuX.LuoC.WangS.ZhangZ.CuiS.BaoX.et al (2015). Effects of Warming, Grazing/cutting and Nitrogen Fertilization on Greenhouse Gas Fluxes during Growing Seasons in an Alpine Meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Agric. For. Meteorology214-215, 506–514. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.008
Summary
Keywords
Tibetan plateau, alpine meadow, effect size, structural equation model, grazing
Citation
Li W, Xu Q, Zhou H and Du Y (2022) Grazing Significantly Increases N2O Emission Rates in Alpine Meadows of the Tibetan Plateau. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:920154. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.920154
Received
03 May 2022
Accepted
06 June 2022
Published
30 June 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Meng Li, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China
Reviewed by
Zhongqing Yan, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China
Bin Wang, NSW DPI, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Li, Xu, Zhou and Du.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yangong Du, ygdu@nwipb.cas.cn
This article was submitted to Land Use Dynamics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.