Reading the article by Luceron-Lucas-Torres et al. (1) we were quite surprised to find that in the abstract the authors drew conclusions that are not supported by data reported in the paper.
In the abstract (but also in the text), in fact, authors stated that “wine drinking demonstrated a protective trend regarding the risk of developing pancreatic, skin, lung, and brain cancer as well as cancer in general”. This statement is puzzling, considering that authors themselves summarize their results concluding that the “systematic review and meta-analysis revealed no association between wine consumption and general, upper digestive tract, colorectal, renal, pancreatic, skin, lung, brain, and gynecological cancers” and that “The study findings reveal no association between wine consumption and the risk of developing any type of cancer”.
Moreover, specifically referring to pancreatic, skin, lung, brain, upper digestive tract and general cancer, in the meta-analysis results section it is clearly reported that “the number of included studies focusing on these cancers was insufficient to perform a meta-analysis”. In our knowledge, according to the scientific approach, if there is no data sufficient to correctly perform a statistical analysis, then those data are not sufficient to draw any scientifically based conclusion.
Furthermore, the meta-analysis quality is poor, it is in fact burdened by the presence of both substantial heterogeneity and publication bias, that were neither investigated nor included as limitation of the study; moreover, and again more important, it is not clear, because never reported, which groups were compared (drinkers vs. non-drinkers?) and why the exposure level (dose of wine consumption) was not taken into any account.
The article contains improper citations, but above all, it is distorted by the diffuse use of “spin” (the misrepresentation of a study's actual results) (2) and contains a lot of misleading messages about the possible positive effect of wine. Just as a representative example: authors stated that “many components in wine could have anticarcinogenic effects, such as resveratrol, which plays antioxidant, antimutagenic, and antiinflammatory roles in carcinogenesis […] Other components with anticarcinogenic properties anthocyanins, quercetin, and tannins”. Also considering that the anticarcinogenic effects of these compounds have only been observed in in vitro studies, we cannot understand the rationale behind the authors mention the presence of negligible quantities of compounds with presumed anti-carcinogenic action, forgetting to mention the presence of over 10% by volume of ethanol, classified by The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a Group 1 carcinogen, that is certainly carcinogenic to humans.
We think that any misleading message about unproven protective effect of wine consumption on cancer is extremely dangerous and could contribute to spread scientifically incorrect information and wrongly induce people to drink wine to protect themselves against cancer.
Consolidated scientific literature demonstrates that the consumption of alcoholic beverages (any type) increases the risk of cancer (mouth, pharynx, larynx, esophagus, liver, colorectum and breast) (3). Alcohol accounts for an estimated 741,300 (or 4%) of new cases of cancer worldwide and contributes to nearly 400,000 deaths due to cancer every year (4). All cancer prevention guidelines agree in communicating that there are no levels or quantities of consumption of any type of alcoholic beverage considered “safe” for health, providing as a general indication the limitation of the consumption of any alcoholic beverage and specifying that for preventing cancer the best choice is not to drink1−3.
Due to the consistent use of spin and misrepresentation of study results to positively influence wine consumption, retraction of the paper should be considered.
Statements
Author contributions
FN: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GP: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. RC: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1.^WCRF/AICR. Available online at: https://www.wcrf.org/diet-activity-and-cancer/cancer-prevention-recommendations/limit-alcohol-consumption/.
2.^American Cancer Society Guideline for Diet and Physical Activity for Cancer Prevention. Available online at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/diet-physical-activity/alcohol-use-and-cancer.html.
3.^European code against cancer International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)/World Health Organization (WHO). Available online at: https://cancer-code-europe.iarc.fr/index.php/en/.
References
1.
Luceron-Lucas-TorresMCavero-RedondoIMartinez-VizcainoVBizzozero-PeroniBPascual-MorenaCAlvarez-BuenoC. Association between wine consumption and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:1197745. 10.3389/fnut.2023.1197745
2.
BoutronIAltmanDGHopewellSVera-BadilloFTannockIRavaudP. Impact of spin in the abstracts of articles reporting results of randomized controlled trials in the field of cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. (2014) 32:4120–26. 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7503
3.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Alcoholic Drinks and the Risk of Cancer (2018). Available online at: dietandcancerreport.org (accessed February 12, 2024).
4.
GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1223–49. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2
Summary
Keywords
alcohol, wine, cancer, meta-analysis, spin
Citation
Natella F, Pastore G and Canali R (2024) Commentary: Association between wine consumption and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 11:1335731. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1335731
Received
09 November 2023
Accepted
06 February 2024
Published
21 February 2024
Volume
11 - 2024
Edited by
Mauro Serafini, University of Teramo, Italy
Reviewed by
Donato Angelino, Department of Bioscience and Technology for Food Agriculture and Environment, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Natella, Pastore and Canali.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fausta Natella fausta.natella@crea.gov.it
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.