ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 27 May 2025

Sec. Nutrition and Metabolism

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1583119

Luteolin mitigates oxidative stress and multi-organ impairment in a propionic acid-induced rodent model of autism

  • Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Article metrics

View details

4

Citations

3,7k

Views

606

Downloads

Abstract

Background/objectives:

Oxidative stress, organ impairments, and gastrointestinal abnormalities are the most common systemic dysfunctions that accompanied the neurodevelopmental condition, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Emerging evidence suggests that increased propionic acid (PPA) levels contribute to ASD pathophysiology through oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and disruption of the gut-liver-brain axis. Thanks to its strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant potencies, luteolin, has shown to be promising in alleviating these effects. This study investigated the therapeutic and protective effects of luteolin in a PPA-induced rodent model of ASD by assessing oxidative stress, intestinal permeability, and liver and kidney dysfunction biomarkers.

Methods:

Fifty young male albino rats were divided into five groups: control, PPA-treated, luteolin-treated, therapeutic (PPA followed by luteolin), and protective (luteolin followed by PPA). Oxidative stress markers (GSH, lipid peroxides, GST, SOD, and catalase), serum zonulin, liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) and renal function markers (urea nitrogen, creatinine) were investigated. ROC analysis evaluated the diagnostic potential of these biomarkers, while Spearman correlation analysis explored interrelationships among parameters.

Results:

PPA administration significantly reduced antioxidant defenses, including GSH, GST, SOD, and catalase, while increasing lipid peroxidation and inducing hepatic and renal dysfunction, as evidenced by elevated ALT, AST, ALP, urea nitrogen, and creatinine levels, along with increased zonulin levels. Luteolin intervention effectively reversed these alterations by restoring antioxidant capacity, lowering zonulin levels, and improving liver and kidney function. ROC analysis demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 1.000) for oxidative stress and organ dysfunction markers in the PPA-treated group, while luteolin treatment significantly enhanced biomarker sensitivity and specificity. Spearman correlation analysis revealed strong negative correlations between antioxidants and oxidative stress markers (p < 0.001) and positive correlations between zonulin and liver/kidney dysfunction indicators (p < 0.001), further confirming the systemic impact of PPA.

Conclusion:

Luteolin effectively alleviated oxidative stress, restored antioxidant defenses, and enhanced liver, kidney, and intestinal barrier functions in a PPA-induced ASD model. These findings underscored its therapeutic potential as a natural intervention for ASD-related systemic dysfunctions. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate its translational applicability in ASD management.

1 Introduction

Repetitive behaviors as well as impairments in communication skills and social interaction are the main characteristics of the neurodevelopmental disorder, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (1, 2). Globally, ASD impacts about 1 in 54 children, with a higher prevalence among males (3). In addition to its hallmark symptoms, ASD is often accompanied by systemic dysfunctions, including oxidative stress, gastrointestinal (GI) issues and organ-specific abnormalities. Genetic predispositions, environmental effects and gut microbiota (GM) abnormalities are all involved in its pathophysiology (4). ASD is frequently associated with heightened oxidative stress, which contributes to neuroinflammation and behavioral disturbances (5). Altered GM and increased intestinal permeability are typical co-morbidities associated with gut-brain axis dysfunction in ASD (4, 6). Additionally, several researchers are beginning to view autism as a systemic disorder with a potential impact on various organs and physiological system, including the liver (7, 8). A recent study by Ahmed et al. (8) demonstrated liver dysfunction and elevated liver enzymes in autistic children compared to controls. Additionally, it has been discovered that children with autism spectrum disorder have greater levels of bacterial metabolites, which have been linked to both acute renal damage and chronic kidney disease (9, 10).

Propionic acid (PPA) is a short-chain fatty acid naturally found in dairy products such as milk, yogurt and cheese (11, 12). It is mainly produced in the colon when GM ferment undigested food. Once absorbed into the bloodstream, PPA can reach adipose tissue, where it lowers plasma fatty acid levels by inhibiting lipolysis, promoting lipogenesis in fat tissues and suppressing fatty acid synthesis in the liver (13). While PPA is crucial for normal immune and physiological functions, elevated levels can disrupt these processes and lead to adverse effects (14). PPA has the ability to cross barriers in the gut, liver, blood, and brain, allowing it to reach the central nervous system (15). Within the brain, PPA penetrates cell membranes and accumulates inside, causing the cells to become more acidic (16, 17). This acidification disrupts neurotransmitter release, potentially affecting neuronal communication and behavior (18, 19). PPA is also implicated in metabolic disturbances, including inhibition of ureagenesis, disruption of fatty acid metabolism (20), and induction of oxidative stress (21, 22). Its ability to traverse the gut-liver-brain axis facilitates systemic effects, contributing to liver dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative damage (15).

Medicinal plants are rich in natural compounds that have been widely studied for their pharmacological effects on various conditions, including cancer, inflammation, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative disorders (23, 24). Flavonoids, key bioactive compounds derived from plants, play essential roles in plant defense and offer a range of health benefits, including anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, antimicrobial, and antidepressant effects (25, 26). Their antioxidant properties largely contribute to these benefits. Indeed, the phenolic structure of flavonoids helps neutralizing free radicals and mitigate oxidative stress by decreasing lipid peroxidation and enhancing antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (27, 28).

Luteolin (3,4,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone) is a natural flavonoid found in various foods such as carrots, apples, cabbage, and certain medicinal plants. It exhibits a range of pharmacological effects, including anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties (29). The structure of luteolin is directly linked to its antioxidant capacity and its ability to resist oxidation through metal ion chelation (30–33). Studies have shown that luteolin reduces oxidative stress, regulates inflammatory pathways and restores the integrity of the gut-liver-kidney axis. Specifically, luteolin provides renoprotective benefits, protecting against renal damage caused by ischemia, nephrotoxic drugs, and sepsis (34–36). The co-administration of this bioactive flavonoid as part of preoperative nutrition has been shown to reduce ischemia–reperfusion injury and minimize intestinal apoptosis (37). Luteolin is also an attractive candidate for developing liver-protective drugs. It targets proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-18 pathways, significantly alleviating inflammation and steatosis while restoring normal levels of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and maintaining a proper balance between reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzymes (38). In addition, luteolin has demonstrated therapeutic potential in neurological disorders. A clinical study found that a dietary supplement containing luteolin significantly improved social interaction in children with ASDs (39). More recent research has further confirmed luteolin’s promise as a therapeutic option for reducing ASD symptoms (40). In the present study, the effect of luteolin was investigated in a PPA-induced ASD rat model, focusing on gut leakiness, liver and renal dysfunctions, as well as oxidative stress.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Animals and experimental design

Animal experiment was carried out in the Experimental Surgery and Animal Laboratory at the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 50 young male albino rats (80–100 g, 3 weeks old) were housed in cages measuring 40 × 35 × 20 cm3 under controlled environmental conditions, with a temperature maintained at 21 ± 1°C and a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 9:00 AM and off at 9:00 PM) and an unrestricted access to water and standard laboratory feed pellets. The experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research at King Saud University, Riyadh (Approval No. KSU-SE-23-26).

The animals were randomly assigned to five groups, each consisting of 10 rats: Group I (Control group): received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) only. Group II (PPA-intoxicated group): administered PPA at a dose of 250 mg/kg daily for 3 days. Group III (Luteolin-treated group): given luteolin at a dose of 50 mg/kg per day for 27 days. The 50 mg/kg dose of luteolin was selected based on previous studies showing its neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects in rats, including models of neurotoxicity (41) and inflammation (42), supporting its use in the PPA-induced ASD model. Group IV (Therapeutic group): received PPA (250 mg/kg daily for 3 days), followed by luteolin (50 mg/kg per day for 27 days). Group V (Protective group): pre-treated with luteolin (50 mg/kg per day for 27 days), followed by PPA administration (250 mg/kg daily for 3 days).

2.2 Serum and tissue collection

On day 28, blood samples were collected via direct cardiac puncture into plain tubes without anticoagulant. Serum was separated by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min.

Meanwhile, the liver and kidney were carefully excised, washed, and sliced into ~1 g fragments. The tissue samples were homogenized in 10 mL of double-distilled water for 3 min using a Teflon homogenizer (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The homogenates were then centrifuged at 4,000 g for 20 min to remove debris. Both tissue homogenates and serum samples were stored at −80°C until further use.

2.3 Biochemical analysis

A panel of selected biochemical markers was measured across all study groups. Oxidative stress biomarkers, including glutathione (GSH) (43), lipid peroxides (44), glutathione-S-transferase (GST) (45), SOD (46), and catalase (47), were analyzed in serum, liver, and kidney tissue homogenates.

Serum zonulin (Cat No. MBS2606662) and urea nitrogen (Cat No. MAK006) were quantified using ELISA kits from MyBioSource and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively, following the manufacturers’ instructions. Additionally, alanine aminotransferase (ALT, Cat No. EL07-150), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, Cat No. EL15-150), alkaline phosphatase (ALP, Cat No. EL04L-150), and creatinine (Cat No. EL33K-1000) levels were assessed in serum samples using colorimetric kits from United Diagnostics Industry, Dammam, KSA, according to the manufacturers’ protocols.

All measurements were performed in triplicate, with the mean of three readings calculated.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed group differences, followed by the Least Significant Difference (LSD) or Mann–Whitney tests for multiple comparisons. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of biochemical parameters, reporting Area Under the Curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. Parameters with high AUC values were strong biomarker candidates. Spearman correlation analysis explored relationships between biochemical parameters, reporting correlation coefficients (R) and p values.

3 Results

Biochemical assessments revealed that PPA exposure significantly disrupted redox homeostasis, marked by a notable reduction in GSH and antioxidant enzyme activities, with a concomitant increase in lipid peroxides across serum, liver, and kidney samples. These findings highlighted oxidative stress as a hallmark of PPA toxicity (Table 1; Figure 1).

Table 1

ParameterGroupNMin.Max.Mean ± SDMedianPercent change (Mean)p value
Serum
GSH (μg/mL)Control6657770.833 ± 4.792cde71100<0.001
Luteolin6667973.167 ± 5.115cde74.5103.29
PPA6294537 ± 5.44abde3752.235
Therapeutic6446555.333 ± 7.941abc5678.117
Protective6537362.667 ± 7.34abc6388.47
Lipid peroxides (MD μmoles/mL)Control61.52.52.067 ± 0.397c2.15100<0.001
Luteolin61.52.251.912 ± 0.264c1.90592.5
PPA62.94.323.625 ± 0.551abde3.685175.403
Therapeutic61.732.852.227 ± 0.433c2.09107.741
Protective61.72.452.098 ± 0.279c2.12101.532
GST (U/mL)Control647.965.857.68 ± 6.536c58.49100<0.001
Luteolin645.962.856.783 ± 5.925c58.198.445
PPA625.740.133.533 ± 5.541abde33.5558.137
Therapeutic643.861.250.6 ± 6.152c50.1587.725
Protective648.161.555.417 ± 5.562c55.996.076
SOD (U/mL)Control619.228.924.183 ± 3.755cd23.95100<0.001
Luteolin622.631.126.783 ± 3.06cde26.9110.75
PPA69.614.512.017 ± 1.860abde12.1549.689
Therapeutic616.225.520.317 ± 3.315abc19.984.011
Protective618.926.222.4 ± 2.995bc22.392.625
Catalase (U/dL)Control64.786.375.707 ± 0.556cd5.75100<0.001
Luteolin65.076.545.738 ± 0.590cd5.63100.55
PPA62.724.23.493 ± 0.624abde3.4861.214
Therapeutic64.055.574.948 ± 0.569abc5.0886.711
Protective64.236.315.39 ± 0.771c5.5194.45
Liver tissue
GSH (μg/mL)Control6108132122.5 ± 8.596cde124100< 0.001
Luteolin6115130123.33 ± 5.501cde123.5100.68
PPA6496356.5 ± 5.431abde5746.122
Therapeutic6738981.833 ± 6.112abce81.566.802
Protective693125105.33 ± 12.484abcd10285.986
Lipid peroxides (MD μmoles/mL)Control61.231.591.411 ± 0.130cd1.4100< 0.001
Luteolin61.171.591.38 ± 0.163cde1.39597.756
PPA62.232.552.408 ± 0.12abde2.415170.6
Therapeutic61.431.721.6 ± 0.104abc1.615113.34
Protective61.361.681.537 ± 0.121bc1.56108.85
GST (U/mL)Control6107135118.167 ± 10.18cde116.5100< 0.001
Luteolin6108134119.833 ± 9.621cde119101.41
PPA6467559 ± 10.695abde56.549.929
Therapeutic68310493.167 ± 7.731abc9478.843
Protective691119104.67 ± 10.289abc104.588.575
SOD (U/mL)Control6668575.333 ± 7.527cde75100< 0.001
Luteolin6658675.833 ± 8.612cde75.5100.66
PPA6335444 ± 8.05abde44.558.407
Therapeutic6476357 ± 6.033abce58.575.663
Protective6597566.5 ± 6.411abcd66.588.274
Catalase (U/dL)Control68811297.333 ± 9.331cd94.5100< 0.001
Luteolin68510695.167 ± 8.329cd95.597.773
PPA6395747.167 ± 6.432abde4748.458
Therapeutic6598169.333 ± 7.554abce68.571.232
Protective67810893.333 ± 11.093cd95.595.89
Kidney tissue
GSH (μg/mL)Control6107131121.33 ± 8.959cd122.5100< 0.001
Luteolin6102139123.5 ± 12.787cd125101.785
PPA6537765.5 ± 8.849abde65.553.983
Therapeutic68611298.667 ± 9.266abce9881.318
Protective699132116.33 ± 12.127cd11795.879
Lipid peroxides (MD μmoles/mL)Control60.821.351.06 ± 0.176cd1.055100< 0.001
Luteolin60.931.251.078 ± 0.122cd1.085101.729
PPA61.92.552.142 ± 0.244abde2.075202.044
Therapeutic61.191.451.32 ± 0.092abc1.31124.528
Protective61.011.311.168 ± 0.112c1.17110.22
GST (U/mL)Control68310893.833 ± 9.786cd92.5100< 0.001
Luteolin68911299.167 ± 10.206cd95105.683
PPA6455952.667 ± 5.316abde53.556.127
Therapeutic6658374.833 ± 6.853abce7679.751
Protective68310293.167 ± 7.250cd9499.289
SOD (U/mL)Control6496658.333 ± 5.887c59100< 0.001
Luteolin6516858.833 ± 6.493cd58.5100.857
PPA6264033.167 ± 5.231abde34.556.857
Therapeutic6446151.5 ± 6.025bc5188.285
Protective6476355.667 ± 5.922c56.595.428
Catalase (U/dL)Control6627768.333 ± 5.278cd67.5100< 0.001
Luteolin6647770.5 ± 4.764cd69.5103.17
PPA6314437.167 ± 4.792abde36.554.39
Therapeutic6476753.5 ± 7.204abce51.578.292
Protective6557563.5 ± 7.61cd61.592.926

Comparative analysis of oxidative stress biomarkers between different groups.

Table 1 describes One-way ANOVA Test between different groups with Multiple Comparisons (LSD test) within the entire groups for each parameter.

a Describes significant difference between the group and the (Control group) at significant level (0.05).

b Describes significant difference between the group and the (Luteolin-Treated group) at significant level (0.05).

c Describes significant difference between the group and the (PPA-Treated group) at significant level (0.05).

d Describes significant difference between the group and the (Therapeutic group) at significant level (0.05).

e Describes significant difference between the group and the (Protective group) at significant level (0.05).

Figure 1

Luteolin treatment whether administered as a preventive or therapeutic intervention effectively restored antioxidant balance. GSH levels, suppressed by PPA, were markedly elevated in luteolin-treated groups, with the protective protocol demonstrating slightly superior outcomes. Similarly, lipid peroxidation, significantly elevated by PPA, was remarkably reduced following luteolin administration, nearing control levels, particularly in the protective group (Table 1; Figure 1).

The activities of key enzymatic antioxidants, including GST, SOD and catalase, were also significantly impaired by PPA. Interestingly, luteolin co-administration restored these activities in both liver and kidney tissues, with the protective regimen showing greater efficacy in normalizing catalase activity (Table 1; Figure 1).

In addition to oxidative stress markers, zonulin levels a biomarker of intestinal permeability—were markedly increased by PPA but significantly reduced in both luteolin-treated groups. These results underscored luteolin’s ability to maintain intestinal barrier integrity (Table 2; Figure 2).

Table 2

ParameterGroupNMin.Max.Mean ± SDMedianPercent change (Mean)p value
Zonulin (ng/mL)Control60.680.910.785 ± 0.087cde0.78100<0.001
Luteolin60.680.840.761 ± 0.063cde0.7597.027
PPA61.852.322.07 ± 0.18abde2.05263.69
Therapeutic60.871.151.011 ± 0.107abc1.02128.87
Protective60.831.140.965 ± 0.114abc0.94122.92
ALT (U/L)Control6395546.616 ± 5.995cde46.5100<0.001
Luteolin6385144.167 ± 4.875cde4494.744
PPA6127.5154141.58 ± 9.178abde142303.71
Therapeutic660.577.568.217 ± 6.284abce68146.33
Protective648.763.156.233 ± 5.522abcd56.75120.62
AST (U/L)Control6435548.833 ± 4.665cde48.5100<0.001
Luteolin6445448.5 ± 4.135cde47.599.317
PPA6237302262.33 ± 22.205abde259537.2
Therapeutic66910187.167 ± 12.656abc90.5178.49
Protective6668575.167 ± 7.223abc75153.92
ALP (U/L)Control690113100.5 ± 8.264cde100100<0.001
Luteolin69110598.833 ± 4.875cde99.598.341
PPA6527645591.167 ± 48.11abde593.5588.22
Therapeutic6129264179.167 ± 49.507abc167.5178.27
Protective6113179144.667 ± 25.781abc146143.94
Urea nitrogen (mg/dL)Control6243529.5 ± 4.037cde29100<0.001
Luteolin6233429.0 ± 4.0cde29.598.305
PPA6225337277.67 ± 40.623abde267.5941.24
Therapeutic6529374.333 ± 14.583abc75251.97
Protective6517260.333 ± 8.756abc59.5204.51
Creatinine (mg/dL)Control681210.083 ± 1.428cd10.25100<0.001
Luteolin691210.333 ± 1.080cd10.25102.47
PPA6557766.167 ± 8.305abde66.5656.19
Therapeutic6172621.0 ± 3.464abce20.5208.26
Protective6101813.833 ± 3.060cd14137.19

Comparative analysis of serum zonulin, liver enzymes and kidney function biomarkers between different groups.

Table 2 describes One-way ANOVA Test between different groups with Multiple Comparisons (LSD test) within the entire groups for each parameter.

a Describes significant difference between the group and the (Control group) at significant level (0.05).

b Describes significant difference between the group and the (Luteolin-Treated group) at significant level (0.05).

c Describes significant difference between the group and the (PPA-Treated group) at significant level (0.05).

d Describes significant difference between the group and the (Therapeutic group) at significant level (0.05).

e Describes significant difference between the group and the (Protective group) at significant level (0.05).

Figure 2

Liver function biomarkers (ALT, AST and ALP) and renal function markers (urea nitrogen and creatinine) were also severely elevated following PPA exposure, indicating multi-organ impairment. Notably, luteolin administration substantially ameliorated these alterations, with the protective approach yielding values closer to baseline compared to the therapeutic group (Table 2; Figure 2).

The ROC analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiple biochemical markers across all experimental groups (Tables 3, 4; Figures 3,4). In the PPA-treated group, all biomarkers exhibited outstanding diagnostic accuracy, with AUC values of 1.0, confirming the significant biochemical and physiological disturbances induced by PPA. In contrast, the luteolin-only group showed low to moderate diagnostic performance across most parameters, with AUC values generally below 0.7, indicating limited predictive power when administered without PPA exposure.

Table 3

ParameterGroupAUCCut-off valueSensitivity %Specificity %p value95% CI
Serum
GSHLuteolin0.347640.00%100.00%0.3510.026–0.668
PPA155100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.98663.583.30%100.00%00.932–1.040
Protective0.79262.550.00%100.00%0.030.528–1.055
Lipid peroxidesLuteolin0.3611.7483.30%33.30%0.4240.021–0.702
PPA12.7100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.5832.57533.30%100.00%0.640.234–0.933
Protective0.51.7983.30%33.30%10.152–0.848
GSTLuteolin0.52846.916.70%100.00%0.8750.182–0.874
PPA144100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.79251.7566.70%83.30%0.0330.524–1.060
Protective0.58362.1100.00%33.30%0.6330.241–0.926
SODLuteolin0.31918.20.00%100.00%0.260.005–0.634
PPA116.85100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.77820.766.70%83.30%0.04610.505–1.051
Protective0.63923.1566.70%66.70%0.4070.311–0.967
CatalaseLuteolin0.55.35533.30%83.30%10.153–0.847
PPA14.49100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.8615.42583.30%83.30%0.0020.634–1.088
Protective0.6115.3650.00%83.30%0.5130.278–0.944
Liver tissue
GSHLuteolin0.514122.550.00%66.70%0.9370.168–0.860
PPA185.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic198.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective0.875106.566.70%100.00%00.666–1.084
Lipid peroxidesLuteolin0.4171.46550.00%66.70%0.6330.074–0.759
PPA11.91100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.9031.59566.70%100.00%00.728–1.078
Protective0.7641.5366.70%83.30%0.0630.486–1.042
GSTLuteolin0.444134.5100.00%16.70%0.750.103–0.786
PPA191100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic1105.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective0.80610450.00%100.00%0.0190.550–1.061
SODLuteolin0.48665.516.70%100.00%0.9380.137–0.835
PPA160100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic164.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective0.81965.550.00%100.00%0.010.576–1.063
CatalaseLuteolin0.56987.533.30%100.00%0.6930.224–0.914
PPA172.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic184.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective0.55685.533.30%100.00%0.7550.206–0.905
Kidney tissue
GSH (μg/mL)Luteolin0.417104.516.70%100.00%0.6330.074–0.759
PPA192100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.97210683.30%100.00%00.889–1.056
Protective0.625115.550.00%83.30%0.4680.288–0.962
Lipid peroxidesLuteolin0.5421.1433.30%83.30%0.8120.197–0.886
PPA11.625100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.8891.155100.00%83.30%00.673–1.105
Protective0.7221.12566.70%83.30%0.1730.403–1.042
GSTLuteolin0.333820.00%100.00%0.3080.013–0.654
PPA171100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.98681.583.30%100.00%00.932–1.040
Protective0.5100.583.30%33.30%10.152–0.848
SODLuteolin0.47254.533.30%83.30%0.8770.122–0.823
PPA144.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.79253.566.70%83.30%0.0330.524–1.060
Protective0.6254816.70%100.00%0.4540.298–0.952
CatalaseLuteolin0.389610.00%100.00%0.5150.055–0.723
PPA153100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.91758.583.30%100.00%00.742–1.091
Protective0.7226150.00%100.00%0.1620.411–1.034

ROC analysis of the oxidative stress biomarkers in the different groups.

Table 4

ParameterGroupAUCCut-off valueSensitivity %Specificity %p value95% CI
ZonulinLuteolin0.4310.71583.30%33.30%0.6930.086–0.776
PPA11.38100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic0.9720.9283.30%100.00%00.889–1.056
Protective0.9030.8783.30%83.30%00.728–1.078
ALTLuteolin0.375560.00%100.00%0.4580.045–0.705
PPA191.25100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic157.75100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective0.88951.3583.30%83.30%00.697–1.081
ASTLuteolin0.48643.5100.00%16.70%0.9370.143–0.829
PPA1146100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic162100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective160.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
ALPLuteolin0.4589583.30%33.30%0.8160.108–0.809
PPA1320100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic1121100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective0.98611783.30%100.00%00.932–1.040
Urea nitrogenLuteolin0.45828.566.70%50.00%0.8120.115–0.801
PPA1130100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic143.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective143100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
CreatinineLuteolin0.5429.2583.30%33.30%0.8110.200–0.884
PPA133.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Therapeutic114.5100.00%100.00%01.000–1.000
Protective0.86112.566.70%100.00%0.0010.644–1.079

ROC analysis of several biomarkers of intestine (Zonulin), liver (ALT, AST & ALP), and renal (urea and creatinine) functioning in the different groups.

Figure 3

Figure 4

Luteolin co-administration in the therapeutic and protective groups substantially enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of numerous markers. In the therapeutic group, several serum and tissue biomarkers such as GSH, ALT, AST, ALP and lipid peroxides exhibited excellent performance (AUC > 0.9), reflecting luteolin’s robust capacity to mitigate PPA-induced biochemical alterations. Similarly, the protective group demonstrated marked improvement in AUC values for key oxidative stress and organ function biomarkers, though to a slightly lesser extent than the therapeutic group. These findings collectively emphasize the potential of luteolin in both preventing and reversing PPA-induced oxidative and functional impairments.

Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed significant interrelationships among biochemical parameters, highlighting the interconnected roles of oxidative stress, intestinal permeability, and liver and kidney function (Table 5). Antioxidants such as GSH, GST, SOD and catalase exhibited strong positive correlations. In contrast, lipid peroxides showed negative correlations with antioxidants. Zonulin displayed a strong negative correlation with antioxidants but was positively correlated with lipid peroxides, ALT and AST. Liver function markers (ALT and AST) were highly correlated with each other and with zonulin, while showing strong negative correlations with antioxidants such as GSH. Similarly, kidney function markers (urea nitrogen and creatinine) were strongly correlated and also positively associated with zonulin. However, they exhibited negative correlations with antioxidants, including GSH.

Table 5

ParametersR (Correlation coefficient)p value
GSH ~ Lipid peroxides−0.564**0.001
GSH ~ GST0.605**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ GST0.493**0.006
GSH ~ SOD0.658**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ SOD−0.542**0.002
GST ~ SOD0.507**0.004
GSH ~ Catalase0.616**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ Catalase−0.394*0.031
GST ~ Catalase0.756**<0.001
SOD ~ Catalase0.702**<0.001
GSH ~ Zonulin−0.698**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ Zonulin0.622**<0.001
GST ~ Zonulin−0.589**<0.001
SOD ~ Zonulin−0.714**<0.001
Catalase ~ Zonulin−0.579**<0.001
GSH ~ ALT−0.756**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ ALT0.572**<0.001
GST ~ ALT−0.694**<0.001
SOD ~ ALT−0.807**<0.001
Catalase ~ ALT−0.703**<0.001
Zonulin ~ ALT0.873**<0.001
GSH ~ AST−0.781**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ AST0.614**<0.001
GST ~ AST−0.526**0.003
SOD ~ AST−0.779**<0.001
Catalase ~ AST−0.613**<0.001
Zonulin ~ AST0.875**<0.001
ALT ~ AST0.893**<0.001
GSH ~ ALP−0.763**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ ALP0.648**<0.001
GST ~ ALP−0.664**<0.001
SOD ~ ALP−0.675**<0.001
Catalase ~ ALP−0.695**<0.001
Zonulin ~ ALP0.830**<0.001
ALT ~ ALP0.867**<0.001
AST ~ ALP0.907**<0.001
GSH ~ Urea nitrogen−0.761**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ Urea nitrogen0.563**<0.001
GST ~ Urea nitrogen−0.670**<0.001
SOD ~ Urea nitrogen−0.807**<0.001
Catalase ~ Urea nitrogen−0.758**<0.001
Zonulin ~ Urea nitrogen0.883**<0.001
ALT ~ Urea nitrogen0.907**<0.001
AST ~ Urea nitrogen0.883**<0.001
ALP ~ Urea nitrogen0.857**<0.001
GSH ~ Creatinine−0.811**<0.001
Lipid peroxides ~ Creatinine0.586**<0.001
GST ~ Creatinine−0.735**<0.001
SOD ~ Creatinine−0.694**<0.001
Catalase ~ Creatinine−0.741**<0.001
Zonulin ~ Creatinine0.814**<0.001
ALT ~ Creatinine0.879**<0.001
AST ~ Creatinine0.834**<0.001
ALP ~ Creatinine0.858**<0.001
Urea nitrogen ~ Creatinine0.869**<0.001

Correlations between the measured parameters using Spearman’s Correlation.

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.

**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.

4 Discussion

This study demonstrated the promising therapeutic and preventive potential of luteolin in mitigating PPA-induced oxidative stress, intestinal barrier dysfunction, and hepatic and renal impairments in a rodent model of ASD. Through biochemical assessments and robust statistical analyses including Spearman correlations and ROC curve evaluations, luteolin showed a strong capacity to restore antioxidant defense mechanisms, reinforce intestinal barrier integrity, and normalize liver and kidney function biomarkers.

Emerging research also underscores the pivotal role of the gut–liver and gut–kidney axes in systemic health. The gut–liver axis facilitates metabolite and immune communication via the portal vein, and its disruption via dysbiosis and increased intestinal permeability can promote hepatic inflammation and oxidative stress (48). Similarly, the gut–kidney axis links microbial metabolites to renal function, with permeability alterations leading to uremic toxin translocation and kidney injury (49). In the current model, PPA-induced permeability may have facilitated harmful microbial product transfer to the liver and kidneys, exacerbating damage. The protective effects of luteolin may thus be partially attributed to its capacity to modulate gut microbiota and enhance intestinal barrier integrity, thereby attenuating pathological processes along these axes (50).

PPA administration lead to increased intestinal permeability, reflected in elevated serum zonulin levels, and widespread oxidative stress, marked by depleted antioxidant enzymes (GSH, GST, SOD, catalase) and increased lipid peroxidation. These results are consistent with previous studies by Kara et al. (51) and Esnafoglu et al. (52), who reported higher zonulin levels in individuals with ASD, indicating a disrupted intestinal barrier. This “leaky gut” state facilitates the entry of microbial products into circulation, exacerbating systemic inflammation and oxidative damage a key mechanism of PPA toxicity (19). Our findings confirmed significantly reduced antioxidant levels and elevated oxidative markers. These results aligned with previous studies reporting oxidative stress in serum (53), liver tissues (15), brain tissues (54, 55), and systemic oxidative stress studies (21, 22).

These oxidative disruptions were strongly correlated with hepatic and renal dysfunction, as reflected in elevated ALT, AST, urea nitrogen, and creatinine, reinforcing previous evidence of PPA-induced multi-organ toxicity (14, 15, 54). However, luteolin intervention, particularly in the protective group, markedly reversed these effects, confirming its potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions. Luteolin treatment significantly improved hepatic oxidative balance likely due to free radical scavenging and upregulation of antioxidant enzymes (27). This finding could be supported by Yao et al. (56) who underlined the hepatoprotective properties of luteolin, especially through the upregulation of antioxidant defenses, including SOD and GSH and the inhibition of oxidative stress markers such as malondialdehyde. This could explain the pronounced recovery observed in liver tissues, where luteolin’s activation of the Nrf2/ARE pathway plays a crucial role (57).

Similarly, kidney tissues responded favorably to luteolin which was consistent with previous studies such as that by Birman et al. (58), where luteolin restored nitric oxide synthase activity and reduced iNOS levels, contributing to renal antioxidative effects. In the current study, both the therapeutic and protective groups restored antioxidant defenses, with the protective group showing greater recovery, supporting luteolin’s role as a potent antioxidant (29). Luteolin’s phenolic structure enhances its free radical scavenging capacity through hydrogen atom donation, reducing oxidative stress markers such as lipid peroxides, as previously reported by Procházková et al. (27) and Wu et al. (28). Both luteolin-treated groups demonstrated a reduction in these markers, restoring near-normal levels, further confirming its hepatoprotective and renoprotective effects (34, 56, 59). Additionally, luteolin’s ability to modulate inflammatory pathways, including IL-1 and IL-18, likely contributes to its protective effects (39).

Elevated zonulin levels in ASD have been associated with greater symptom severity, pointing to a link between intestinal permeability and metabolic disruption (51, 52, 60). In this study, luteolin significantly reduced serum zonulin in both therapeutic and protective groups, suggesting its role in preserving intestinal barrier integrity (50, 61). Interestingly, a significant inverse correlation was found between antioxidant levels (such as GSH and SOD) and serum zonulin, suggesting that oxidative stress contributes directly to intestinal barrier dysfunction. This finding was in line with a recent study by Yuan et al. (62) that demonstrated luteolin’s ability to restore barrier integrity in a Caco-2 cell model by reducing ROS, increasing antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD and GSH), and upregulating tight junction proteins like ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-1. The study also showed that luteolin’s protective effects involve activation of Nrf2 signaling and suppression of ERK and NF-κB/MLCK pathways. These results highlighted the importance of antioxidant defense in modulating intestinal permeability, and supported the use of luteolin as a dietary supplement to preserve gut integrity under oxidative stress conditions.

Correlation analysis further illuminated the underlying pathophysiology, revealing strong negative correlations between oxidative stress markers and antioxidants, and positive correlations with liver and kidney damage parameters (e.g., ALT, AST, creatinine). These findings underscored oxidative stress as a central driver of PPA-induced multi-organ damage and highlighted the importance of antioxidant defense in mitigating systemic toxicity. The antioxidant and protective role of luteolin was well supported by previous research. For instance, Owumi et al. (63) demonstrated that luteolin co-treatment alleviated doxorubicin-induced hepatorenal toxicity in rats by reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, while improving antioxidant status, tissue integrity, and survival. This reinforces luteolin’s potential as a chemoprotective agent in oxidative stress-related pathologies.

Furthermore, the ROC analysis could provide valuable insights into the diagnostic efficacy of various biomarkers for detecting PPA-induced oxidative stress and organ dysfunction, as well as the therapeutic and protective potential of luteolin. In the PPA group, nearly all biomarkers had AUC = 1.00, indicating severe systemic damage with high diagnostic accuracy (15, 64, 65). Upon luteolin treatment, the therapeutic group exhibited notable improvements. Serum GSH levels, for instance, achieved an AUC of 0.986, with 83.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, highlighting a significant recovery in antioxidant capacity. Consistent with Ben Bacha et al. (55), luteolin demonstrated neuroprotective and neurotherapeutic properties, effectively counteracting oxidative stress and cognitive impairment. Similarly, liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) and renal function biomarkers (urea nitrogen, creatinine) maintained an AUC of 1.000, indicating complete restoration of liver and kidney functions. These findings aligned with previous research on luteolin’s antioxidative and organ-protective properties. For instance, Yao et al. (56) explored its pharmacological effects and pharmacokinetics in mitigating liver injury, while Diniz et al. (29) highlighted its renoprotective effects against kidney damage.

In the protective group, while some biomarkers, such as AST and urea nitrogen, retained an AUC of 1.000, others, like serum GSH, exhibited reduced sensitivity (50.0%) despite (100%) specificity, resulting in a lower AUC of 0.792. This suggested that preventive luteolin administration provided partial protection against PPA-induced oxidative stress and organ dysfunction. These findings could be supported by previous researches exploring luteolin’s protective effects in oxidative stress models. For instance, Al-Dbass et al. (53) investigated the protective and therapeutic potential of N-acetyl-cysteine against PPA-induced neurotoxicity, utilizing ROC analysis to evaluate various biomarkers. This study might offer a comparative perspective on antioxidant interventions, reinforcing the relevance of luteolin in mitigating oxidative damage.

Although the current findings were based on a PPA-induced model of ASD, which primarily reflected environmental and metabolic contributions, the observed therapeutic effects of luteolin particularly its antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and gut-protective properties suggested that it may also be beneficial in genetic models of autism. Future studies using established genetic mouse models such as Shank3 or Fmr1 mutants could provide further insights into the broader applicability of luteolin as a neuroprotective and disease-modifying agent in ASD.

5 Conclusion

This study highlighted the detrimental effects of PPA-induced oxidative stress, increased intestinal permeability, and organ dysfunction, reinforcing its role in metabolic disturbances and ASD. The findings demonstrated that luteolin effectively mitigated these effects by restoring antioxidant defenses, improving biochemical markers, and preserving gut–liver–kidney homeostasis. Its ability to modulate oxidative stress pathways and gut–organ communication underscores luteolin’s potential as both a therapeutic and protective agent. Overall, this study showed promise for the use of evidence-based dietary interventions in ASD. Future study should concentrate on luteolin’s molecular mechanisms in order to optimize its therapeutic application.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by the experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research at King Saud University, Riyadh (Approval No. KSU-SE-23-26). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

AK: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. AlA: Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. MA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. ArA: Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. EA-S: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Software, Writing – review & editing. AB: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to Ongoing Funding Research Program, (ORF-2025-237), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for funding this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing (2013).

  • 2.

    LordCElsabbaghMBairdGVeenstra-VanderweeleJ. Autism spectrum disorder. Lancet (London, England). (2018) 392:50820. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31129-2

  • 3.

    MaennerMJShawKABaioJPatrickMDiRienzoMChristensenDLet al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years - autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. MMWR Surveill Summ. (2020) 69:112. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6904a1

  • 4.

    DargenioVNDargenioCCastellanetaSDe GiacomoALaguardiaMSchettiniFet al. Intestinal barrier dysfunction and microbiota-gut-brain axis: possible implications in the pathogenesis and treatment of autism spectrum disorder. Nutrients. (2023) 15:1620. doi: 10.3390/nu15071620

  • 5.

    UsuiNKobayashiHShimadaS. Neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:5487. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065487

  • 6.

    FattorussoADi GenovaLDell'IsolaGBMencaroniEEspositoS. Autism spectrum disorders and the gut microbiota. Nutrients. (2019) 11:521. doi: 10.3390/nu11030521

  • 7.

    TrincheseGCimminoFCavaliereGCatapanoAFoglianoCLamaAet al. The hepatic mitochondrial alterations exacerbate meta-inflammation in autism spectrum disorders. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). (2022) 11:1990. doi: 10.3390/antiox11101990

  • 8.

    AhmedJMYOmearHA-HHasanAH. Liver enzyme activity in children with autism spectrum disorder. Afr J Biomed Res. (2024) 27:69329. doi: 10.53555/734f1z11

  • 9.

    ClothierJAbsoudM. Autism spectrum disorder and kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol (Berlin, Germany). (2021) 36:298795. doi: 10.1007/s00467-020-04875-y

  • 10.

    HillZRFlynnCKAdamsJB. Indoxyl sulfate and autism spectrum disorder: a literature review. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:12973. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312973

  • 11.

    LangsrudTReinboldGW. Flavor development and microbiology of Swiss cheese–a review. J Food Prot. (1973) 36:48790. doi: 10.4315/0022-2747-36.9.487

  • 12.

    Fernandez-GarciaEMcGregorJU. Determination of organic acids during the fermentation and cold storage of yogurt. J Dairy Sci. (1994) 77:29349. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77234-9

  • 13.

    VenemaK. Role of gut microbiota in the control of energy and carbohydrate metabolism. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. (2010) 13:4328. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32833a8b60

  • 14.

    GreenmanNAbdelliLSHassounehSAAliSJohnstonCNaserSAet al. Impact of propionic acid-rich diets on microbial composition of the murine gut microbiome. Front Microb. (2024) 3:1451735. doi: 10.3389/frmbi.2024.1451735

  • 15.

    Al-DaihanSShafi BhatR. Impact of propionic acid on liver damage in rats. Int J Mol Cell Med. (2015) 4:18895. PMID:

  • 16.

    KaruriARDobrowskyETannockIF. Selective cellular acidification and toxicity of weak organic acids in an acidic microenvironment. Br J Cancer. (1993) 68:10807. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.485

  • 17.

    CannizzaroCMonasteroRVaccaMMartireM. [3H]-DA release evoked by low pH medium and internal H+ accumulation in rat hypothalamic synaptosomes: involvement of calcium ions. Neurochem Int. (2003) 43:917. doi: 10.1016/s0197-0186(02)00211-5

  • 18.

    SeversonCAWangWPieriboneVADohleCIRichersonGB. Midbrain serotonergic neurons are central pH chemoreceptors. Nat Neurosci. (2003) 6:113940. doi: 10.1038/nn1130

  • 19.

    MacFabeDFCainDPRodriguez-CapoteKFranklinAEHoffmanJEBoonFet al. Neurobiological effects of intraventricular propionic acid in rats: possible role of short chain fatty acids on the pathogenesis and characteristics of autism spectrum disorders. Behav Brain Res. (2007) 176:14969. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.025

  • 20.

    GlasgowAMChaseHP. Effect of propionic acid on fatty acid oxidation and ureagenesis. Pediatr Res. (1976) 10:6836. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197607000-00010

  • 21.

    KhalilSRAbd-ElhakimYMSelimMEAl-AyadhiLY. Apitoxin protects rat pups brain from propionic acid-induced oxidative stress: the expression pattern of Bcl-2 and Caspase-3 apoptotic genes. Neurotoxicology. (2015) 49:12131. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.05.011

  • 22.

    ErtenF. Lycopene ameliorates propionic acid-induced autism spectrum disorders by inhibiting inflammation and oxidative stress in rats. J Food Biochem. (2021) 45:e13922. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.13922

  • 23.

    TapsellLCHemphillICobiacLPatchCSSullivanDRFenechMet al. Health benefits of herbs and spices: the past, the present, the future. Med J Aust. (2006) 185:S1S24. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00548.x

  • 24.

    MeenaSKanthaliyaBJoshiAKhanFAroraJ. Biologia futura: medicinal plants-derived bioactive peptides in functional perspective-a review. Biologia futura. (2020) 71:195208. doi: 10.1007/s42977-020-00042-4

  • 25.

    WangTYLiQBiKS. Bioactive flavonoids in medicinal plants: structure, activity and biological fate. Asian J Pharm Sci. (2018) 13:1223. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2017.08.004

  • 26.

    GuptaGSiddiquiMAKhanMMAjmalMAhsanRRahamanMAet al. Current pharmacological trends on Myricetin. Drug Res. (2020) 70:44854. doi: 10.1055/a-1224-3625

  • 27.

    ProcházkováDBoušováIWilhelmováN. Antioxidant and prooxidant properties of flavonoids. Fitoterapia. (2011) 82:51323. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2011.01.018

  • 28.

    WuSZhangYRenFQinYLiuJLiuJet al. Structure-affinity relationship of the interaction between phenolic acids and their derivatives and β-lactoglobulin and effect on antioxidant activity. Food Chem. (2018) 245:6139. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.122

  • 29.

    DinizLRLElshabrawyHASouzaMTSDuarteABSMadhavNde SousaDP. Renoprotective effects of Luteolin: therapeutic potential for COVID-19-associated acute kidney injuries. Biomol Ther. (2022) 12:1544. doi: 10.3390/biom12111544

  • 30.

    LinYShiRWangXShenHM. Luteolin, a flavonoid with potential for cancer prevention and therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. (2008) 8:63446. doi: 10.2174/156800908786241050

  • 31.

    NabaviSFBraidyNGortziOSobarzo-SanchezEDagliaMSkalicka-WoźniakKet al. Luteolin as an anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective agent: a brief review. Brain Res Bull. (2015) 119:111. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2015.09.002

  • 32.

    ImranMRaufAAbu-IzneidTNadeemMShariatiMAKhanIAet al. Luteolin, a flavonoid, as an anticancer agent: a review. Biomed Pharmacother. (2019) 112:108612. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108612

  • 33.

    ManzoorMFAhmadNAhmedZSiddiqueRZengXARahamanAet al. Novel extraction techniques and pharmaceutical activities of luteolin and its derivatives. J Food Biochem. (2019) 43:e12974. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.12974

  • 34.

    DomitrovićRCvijanovićOPugelEPZagoracGBMahmutefendićHŠkodaM. Luteolin ameliorates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in mice through inhibition of platinum accumulation, inflammation and apoptosis in the kidney. Toxicology. (2013) 310:11523. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.05.015

  • 35.

    ArslanBYArslanFErkalpKAlagölASevdiMSYıldızGet al. Luteolin ameliorates colistin-induced nephrotoxicity in the rat models. Ren Fail. (2016) 38:173540. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2016.1229995

  • 36.

    DarAAFehaidAAlkhataniSAlarifiSAlqahtaniWSAlbasherGet al. The protective role of luteolin against the methotrexate-induced hepato-renal toxicity via its antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects in rats. Hum Exp Toxicol. (2021) 40:1194207. doi: 10.1177/0960327121991905

  • 37.

    van HoornDENijveldtRJBoelensPGHofmanZvan LeeuwenPAvan NorrenK. Effects of preoperative flavonoid supplementation on different organ functions in rats. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. (2006) 30:3028. doi: 10.1177/0148607106030004302

  • 38.

    Abu-ElsaadNEl-KarefA. Protection against nonalcoholic steatohepatitis through targeting IL-18 and IL-1alpha by luteolin. Pharmacol Rep. (2019) 71:68894. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.03.009

  • 39.

    TaliouAZintzarasELykourasLFrancisK. An open-label pilot study of a formulation containing the anti-inflammatory flavonoid luteolin and its effects on behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. Clin Ther. (2013) 35:592602. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.04.006

  • 40.

    MehdarKMAlqahtaniSM. Protective effects of luteolin on a rat model of autism: an analysis of luteolin flavonoid’s effects on rat behaviour, histology, and cerebellar pathology. Int J Pharmacol. (2024) 20:94255. doi: 10.3923/ijp.2024.942.955

  • 41.

    AlbrakatiA. The potential neuroprotective of luteolin against acetamiprid-induced neurotoxicity in the rat cerebral cortex. Front Vet Sci. (2024) 11:1361792. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1361792

  • 42.

    LodhiSVadnereGPPatilKDPatilTP. Protective effects of luteolin on injury induced inflammation through reduction of tissue uric acid and pro-inflammatory cytokines in rats. J Tradit Complement Med. (2019) 10:609. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2019.02.004

  • 43.

    BeutlerEDuronOKellyBM. Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J Lab Clin Med. (1963) 61:8828. PMID:

  • 44.

    Ruiz-LarreaMBLealAMLizaMLacortMde GrootH. Antioxidant effects of estradiol and 2-hydroxyestradiol on iron-induced lipid peroxidation of rat liver microsomes. Steroids. (1994) 59:3838. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(94)90006-x

  • 45.

    HabigWHPabstMJJakobyWB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. (1974) 249:71309. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42083-8

  • 46.

    McCordJMFridovichI. Superoxide dismutase. An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J Biol Chem. (1969) 244:604955. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)63504-5

  • 47.

    MaehlyACChanceB. The assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Biochem Anal. (1954) 1:357424. doi: 10.1002/9780470110171.ch14

  • 48.

    AlbillosAde GottardiARescignoM. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: pathophysiological basis for therapy. J Hepatol. (2020) 72:55877. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.003

  • 49.

    TsujiKUchidaNNakanohHFukushimaKHaraguchiSKitamuraSet al. The gut-kidney Axis in chronic kidney diseases. Diagnostics. (2025) 15:21. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010021

  • 50.

    YangSDuanHYanZXueCNiuTChengWet al. Luteolin alleviates ulcerative colitis in mice by modulating gut microbiota and plasma metabolism. Nutrients. (2025) 17:203. doi: 10.3390/nu17020203

  • 51.

    KaraHBurak AçıkelSÇetinkayaMÇiğdem TuncerS. Serum Zonulin levels are higher among children with autism Spectrum disorders and correlated with social impairment. Alpha Psychiatry. (2021) 22:2506. doi: 10.1530/alphapsychiatry.2021.21152

  • 52.

    EsnafogluECırrıkSAyyıldızSNErdilAErtürkEYDaglıAet al. Increased serum Zonulin levels as an intestinal permeability marker in autistic subjects. J Pediatr. (2017) 188:2404. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.04.004

  • 53.

    Al-DbassAM. N-acetylcysteine reduces the neurotoxic effects of propionic acid in rat pups. J King Saud Univ Sci. (2014) 26:25460. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2013.08.006

  • 54.

    FontellaFUPulrolnikVGassenEWannmacherCMKleinABWajnerMet al. Propionic and L-methylmalonic acids induce oxidative stress in brain of young rats. Neuroreport. (2000) 11:5414. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200002280-00023

  • 55.

    Ben BachaAAlonaziMAljehaniEMAlabdaliANBhatRAlmuayrifiMet al. Luteolin ameliorating effects of endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in an ASD rodent model. Int J Pharmacol. (2024) 20:147987. doi: 10.3923/ijp.2024.1479.1487

  • 56.

    YaoCDaiSWangCFuKWuRZhaoXet al. Luteolin as a potential hepatoprotective drug: molecular mechanisms and treatment strategies. Biomed Pharmacother. (2023) 167:115464. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115464

  • 57.

    SuraweeraLRupasingheHPVDellaireGXuZ. Regulation of Nrf2/ARE pathway by dietary flavonoids: a friend or foe for cancer management?Antioxidants. (2020) 9:973. doi: 10.3390/antiox9100973

  • 58.

    BirmanHDarKAKapucuAAcarSUzümG. Effects of Luteolin on liver, kidney and brain in pentylentetrazol-induced seizures: involvement of metalloproteinases and NOS activities. Balkan Med J. (2012) 29:18896. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2011.030

  • 59.

    KolankayaDKorkmazA. Luteolin prevents ischemia/reperfusion-induced damage in the rat kidney. Toxicol Lett. (2008) 180:S50. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.615

  • 60.

    Al-AyadhiLZayedNBhatRSMoubayedNMSAl-MuammarMNEl-AnsaryAet al. The use of biomarkers associated with leaky gut as a diagnostic tool for early intervention in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Gut Pathog. (2021) 13:54. doi: 10.1186/s13099-021-00448-y

  • 61.

    XieXZhaoMHuangSLiPChenPLuoXet al. Luteolin alleviates ulcerative colitis by restoring the balance of NCRILC3/NCR+ILC3 to repairing impaired intestinal barrier. Int Immunopharmacol. (2022) 112:109251. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109251

  • 62.

    YuanJCheSRuanZSongLTangRZhangL. Regulatory effects of flavonoids luteolin on BDE-209-induced intestinal epithelial barrier damage in Caco-2 cell monolayer model. Food Chem Toxicol. (2021) 150:112098. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112098

  • 63.

    OwumiSELewuDOArunsiUOOyelereAK. Luteolin attenuates doxorubicin-induced derangements of liver and kidney by reducing oxidative and inflammatory stress to suppress apoptosis. Hum Exp Toxicol. (2021) 40:165672. doi: 10.1177/09603271211006171

  • 64.

    El-AnsaryAKBen BachaAKotbM. Etiology of autistic features: the persisting neurotoxic effects of propionic acid. J Neuroinflammation. (2012) 9:74. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-74

  • 65.

    WalkerLMYorkJLImamSZAliSFMuldrewKLMayeuxPR. Oxidative stress and reactive nitrogen species generation during renal ischemia. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol. (2001) 63:1438. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/63.1.143

Summary

Keywords

autism spectrum disorder, luteolin, oxidative stress, leaky gut, liver, kidney

Citation

Khayyat AIA, Alabdali AN, Alonazi M, Alzahrani AA, Al-Shehri E and Ben Bacha A (2025) Luteolin mitigates oxidative stress and multi-organ impairment in a propionic acid-induced rodent model of autism. Front. Nutr. 12:1583119. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1583119

Received

28 February 2025

Accepted

28 April 2025

Published

27 May 2025

Volume

12 - 2025

Edited by

Marija Takic, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Reviewed by

Luca Pangrazzi, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Marko Miler, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Abir Ben Bacha,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics