Quality characteristics and volatile profiles of giant salamander (Andrias davidianus) meat during the air frying process

Introduction: This study investigated the effects of air frying duration on the texture, color, and flavor characteristics of Andrias davidianus meat slices.

Methods: Meat slices were air fried at 180 °C for 0–20 min. Quality attributes and volatile compounds were analyzed using HS-GC-IMS and multivariate statistical analysis.

Results: With increasing frying durations, the shear force and a^* values significantly increased (P < 0.05), whereas the yield and L^* values decreased (P < 0.05), and the b^* value peaked at 15 min. A total of 48 volatile compounds, including aldehydes, ketones, esters, acids, alcohols, terpenes, and sulfides. The aldehyde and ketone contents increased with frying durations, whereas the ester and sulfide contents decreased, and the acid contents increased and then decreased. Principal component analysis (PCA) effectively distinguished samples at different frying stages, and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) identified 22 key volatiles with variable importance in projection (VIP) > 1. Relative odor activity value (ROAV) analysis further revealed 15 odor-active compounds (ROAVs = 1), among which 1-octen-3-ol, hexanal, ethyl 2-methylpropanoate, methyl benzoate, and diallyl disulfide were key aromatic substances.

Conclusions: Air frying at 180 °C for 10–15 min resulted in more desirable quality and flavor characteristics, providing guidance for the development of ready-to-eat giant salamander meat products.

1 Introduction

The giant salamander (Andrias davidianus) belongs to the Cryptobranchidae family and is among the world's largest extant amphibians (1). As a rare species, the wild giant salamander is a National Grade II Protected Animal under current Chinese laws and regulations. Nevertheless, the offspring from captive breeding and farming can be processed and exploited as aquatic products or functional ingredients (2). In recent years, the giant salamander farming industry has developed rapidly in Shaanxi, Hunan, and Guizhou in China because of the maturation of artificial breeding techniques (3). The success of farming technology has made the market price of giant salamanders more affordable, which has provided a stable raw material base for the development of deep-processing products (4). Giant salamanders have attracted attention for their high nutritional and medicinal value (4). Its meat is rich in high-quality proteins, collagen, active peptides, and essential fatty acids, among other biologically active substances, and it has a variety of functional properties, such as antioxidant, antibacterial, and antiaging properties (1). With the development of giant salamander aquaculture and the emerging concept of “Great Health” (1, 5), how to increase the utilization of its resources and develop new food products through further processing technologies (e.g., air frying) has become a common concern for both industry and academia.

In modern cooking practices, meat is often processed by roasting, boiling, and frying (6). Frying is an important way to endow food with a unique flavor and texture. However, traditional frying methods may lead to oil oxidation and the generation of harmful substances. In recent years, air frying (AF), a low-fat, convenient, and good-flavor alternative, has gradually become favored by consumers. Compared with traditional frying, air frying achieves food heating through hot air circulation, significantly reducing the use of oil, and has obvious advantages in flavor preservation and nutrient retention (7, 8). In the process of air frying, lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates in food undergo a thermal degradation reaction (9) and then generate a wide variety of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which directly affect flavor shaping, aroma emission, and the overall sensory quality of the finished product (10). Therefore, accurate analysis and identification of the composition of and changes in VOCs are highly important for optimizing processing technology and improving product quality.

Headspace-gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC–IMS) combines the high separation capability of gas chromatography (GC) with the rapid response of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS). This technique enables high-sensitivity detection at atmospheric pressure without complex pretreatment, offering a short analysis time and low detection limits (11–13). Compared with conventional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), HS-GC–IMS has superior sensitivity for low-concentration volatile compounds and generates two- or three-dimensional volatile fingerprint spectra, allowing rapid visual differentiation of sample flavors (12, 13). While electronic noses provide simple operation and real-time analysis, they are limited in compound-level identification. In contrast, HS-GC–IMS captures the overall odor profile and identifies key volatile components, providing a more comprehensive perspective for food flavor analysis and sample characterization (11–13). At present, HS-GC–IMS technology is frequently employed in food analysis, biomedical and clinical detection, environmental detection, and other fields (14–16). In the field of aquatic products, this technology has formed a mature application system. For example, Liu et al. (17) analyzed precursor substances via HPLC and evaluated flavor changes via HS-GC–IMS, electronic tongue, and electronic nose techniques, systematically revealing the dynamic influence of different processing steps on the flavor of beer. Han et al. (18) utilized chemical analysis methods such as HS-GC–IMS in conjunction with sensory evaluation to analyze the similarities and variations in the taste and odor of squid from various habitats. Li et al. (19) systematically analyzed the changes and dynamic characteristics of volatile flavor compounds during the fermentation of traditional Chinese shrimp paste by integrating electronic nose, solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and HS-GC–IMS techniques. These studies demonstrated that HS-GC–IMS technology can be employed to determine the flavor change profile of giant salamander meat during different frying durations, thus providing strong support for scientifically and reasonably optimizing cooking conditions, improving flavor, and ensuring food safety.

Our previous study characterized the quality traits and flavor volatiles of giant salamander meatballs fried via different methods (20). Given the popularity of air-fried ready-to-eat products, as well as the development demand for giant salamander value-added products, it is necessary to investigate the quality characteristics and flavor profiles of air-fried giant salamander meat products. However, few reports in this regard can be found. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to investigate changes in the yield, shear force, color values, and sensory evaluations of Andrias davidianus meat during air frying (180 °C, 0–20 min). Moreover, the VOCs present in Andrias davidianus meat during air frying were also characterized via HS-GC–IMS and chemometrics, which could provide a foundation for optimizing processing technology and improving product flavor quality in the future.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials and reagents

Fresh and live giant salamanders (5 tails, 2.25 ± 0.25 kg) were acquired from Longtoushan Aquaculture Co., Ltd. (Hanzhong, China), slaughtered, cleaned, eviscerated, vacuum packaged, and transported to the laboratory under frozen conditions.

Cooking wine was purchased from Yangxi Meiweixian Seasoning Food Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China). Table salt was purchased from Sichuan Jiuda Penglai Salt Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). Edible rapeseed oil was purchased from YIHAI KERRY Food Industry Co., Ltd. (Xianyang, China). Garlic and ginger were purchased from Lianhu Farmers' Market (Hanzhong, China).

The n-ketone standards (2-butanone, 2-pentanone, 2-hexanone, 2-heptanone, 2-octanone, and 2-nonanone) were analytically pure compounds purchased from Aladdin Company (Shanghai, China).

2.2 Sample preparation

The frozen giant salamander was first thawed and sliced into uniformly sized meat slices. The samples were subsequently marinated with ginger (1.0%, w/w), garlic (1.0%, w/w), cooking wine (2.0%, w/w), and salt (1.5%, w/w) to diminish the fishy odor. The formulation was established on the basis of previous studies on flavor optimization in seafood and fried products (21, 22) and further refined through preliminary sensory evaluation. After marination for 10 min, the ginger and garlic were removed, and the meat slices on the outside were equally covered with a thin coating of rapeseed oil. The sample was positioned in an air fryer and cooked for 0, 5, 10, 15, or 20 min at 180 °C. Following frying, the quality indicators were measured after the extra surface oil was removed with tissue paper.

2.3 Yield estimation

Referring to the experimental methods of Jin et al. (3) and Kim et al. (23) and modifying them, three meat slice samples from each treatment group with different durations of air frying (5, 10, 15, and 20 min) were weighed before and after frying. The percentage of mass loss at each time point was calculated via the following formula:

$\begin{array}{l}Yield(\frac{g}{100g})=\frac{sampleweightafterfrying(g)}{sampleweightbeforefrying(g)}\times 100\end{array}$

2.4 Measurement of shear force

A digital screen muscle tenderness instrument (C-LM3B, Northeast China) was used to calculate the samples' shear force data at each air frying time (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min), and the greatest amount of force needed to shear each sample cross-section was recorded. Each group of samples had three measurements, and an analysis was conducted using the mean value.

2.5 Color value measurement

A color difference meter (SMY-200 series, Beijing Shengmingyang Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.) was used to gauge the hue of the surface of each sample. Before measurement, a white calibration plate was used for standardization, and the values of L^* (brightness), a^* (red–green), and b^* (yellow–blue) were recorded. Each group has 4 samples, and it is determined that the characteristic hue is the average value.

2.6 Sensory evaluation

Sensory evaluation was conducted according to the requirements of the Chinese recommended national standard GB/T 22210−2008, with appropriate adjustments. The sensory evaluation was carried out by an evaluation panel consisting of 10 rigorously selected food science postgraduate students (5 male, 5 female, aged 18–28). All members met the following criteria: no taste or smell impairments, nonsmokers, no history of food allergies, and completed systematic training in the course “Food Sensory Evaluation” at Shaanxi University of Technology (including theoretical examinations and practical tests), enabling them to accurately identify the five basic tastes (sour, sweet, bitter, salty, and umami). The formal experiment was conducted in a standardized sensory laboratory at Shaanxi University of Technology (temperature: 25 ± 1 °C, uniform lighting, no interfering odors). To avoid order effects, a completely randomized block design was used, with samples marked with three-digit random codes for blind testing (24). Each evaluator independently conducted three repeated evaluations of five groups of samples with different frying durations, with a 2-min interval between each evaluation (during which the mouth was rinsed with warm water to remove residual flavors) (25). The evaluation indices include color, smell, texture, taste, and overall acceptability (26), which are rated on a nine-point liking scale (1 for extremely disliked and 9 for extremely liked) (23), and the ultimate score is calculated by taking the mean of every item's values.

2.7 HS-GC–IMS detection of VOCs

The HS-GC–IMS assay was performed according to the methods of Li et al. (19) with some modifications. A 20.0 ml headspace vial was filled with a precisely weighed 1.0 g portion of giant salamander meat. For every sample, three parallel example groups were created (19, 20). To encourage gas release, the components were oscillated at 500 r/min for 20 min while cultured at 60 °C. Following incubation, 500.0 μl of gas sample was drawn from the headspace with an airtight injection needle and injected into a Flavorspec^® GC–IMS (G.A.S., Germany) for GC–IMS analysis. The headspace injection conditions were splitless mode, and the injection needle temperature was set at 85 °C. The gas chromatography conditions were as follows: the carrier gas was nitrogen with a purity of 99.999%, the column temperature was 60 °C, and the initial carrier gas flux rate was 2.00 mL/min. After 2 min, the linearity increased to 10.00 ml/min in 8 min and then to 100.00 ml/min in 10 min. Finally, the mixture was incubated for 5 min. The total operation time of chromatography was 25 min. The IMS detection parameters included the following: ionization source, tritium (3H); migration tube length, 53 mm; electric field intensity, 500 V/cm; migration tube temperature, 45 °C; drift gas, high-purity nitrogen (purity ≥ 99.999%); flow rate, 150 ml/min; and positive ion detection mode, 45 °C. A mixed standard of external standard substances (n-ketones C4–C9) was detected, calibration curves for retention time (RT) and retention index (RI) were established, and then the RI of the target substance was calculated on the basis of its RT. The built-in GC RI (NIST 2020) database and IMS detection time (DT) database in VOCal software were used for retrieval and comparison to perform qualitative analysis of the target substance (20, 27).

2.8 Relative odor activity value

The relative odor activity value (ROAV) method was used to screen and identify the primary volatile flavor substances of the samples at various frying stages (28). Referring to the method of Li et al. (19), the ROAV value of the component that contributes the most to the samples' overall flavor was defined as 100, and the ROAV values of the other components were computed as ROAV via the following equation:

$\begin{array}{l}ROAV\approx \frac{C_i}{C_s}\times \frac{T_s}{T_i}\times 100\end{array}$

where C_S and T_S represent the relative content and odor threshold of the volatile substances that contribute the most to the sample's flavor, respectively, and C_i and T_i represent the relative content and odor threshold of each volatile ingredient in the sample, respectively.

2.9 Data processing

Using plugins such as Reporter and Gallery Plot in the VOCal data processing software, three-dimensional spectra, two-dimensional spectra, difference spectra, and fingerprints of volatile components were generated. Aromatic compounds were identified on the basis of the NIST 2020 and IMS databases. The relative amounts of various volatile components were computed by normalizing the peak volumes. The data are expressed as the average ± standard deviation (n ≥ 3) and were analyzed via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS 27.0.1 (P < 0.05). Plots were generated via Origin 2021 software and online websites (https://cloud.metware.cn/#/home and https://www.chiplot.online/circle_heatmap.html).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Quality attributes of giant salamander meat after varying durations of AF

The processing quality characteristics of meat products mainly include yield, color, texture, and other indicators. In this research, the effects of the air frying durations on the processing yield, shear force, color value (L^*, a^*, b^*), and sensory evaluation of giant salamander meat slices were measured. The results are shown in Figures 1A–E.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Effects of different AF durations on the meat quality attributes of giant salamanders: (A) photograph of their appearance; (B) processing yield; (C) shear force; (D) color value; (E) sensory evaluation. Data in the figure are expressed as average ± standard deviation (n ≥ 3) and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS 27.0.1. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Figure 1A shows images of giant salamander meat slices after different durations of air frying. The experimental observations revealed that with increasing air frying durations, the surface of the giant salamander meat samples gradually presented an obvious curling phenomenon, and the degree of curling increased with increasing heat treatment time. In addition, the color of the sample gradually changed from the initial raw meat state to a burnt yellow color. When the treatment time reaches 20 min, a local coking phenomenon appears at the edge of the sample, which indicates that the time parameter has approached or exceeded the optimal heat treatment threshold of the sample.

Figure 1B shows that the sample processing yield decreased dramatically as the air frying durations increased (P < 0.05), with values of 64.01% in the 5-min group and 48.20% in the 10-min group. The yield of the 15-min treatment group decreased sharply to 29.92%, and that of the 20-min group tended to be stable at 28.40%. This phenomenon is due mainly to the continuous evaporation loss of water during high-temperature processes. Similar phenomena were also reported in the studies of Li et al. (29) and Lin et al. (30).

The shear force of the giant salamander meat samples subjected to different durations of air frying significantly increased nonlinearly (P < 0.05) (Figure 1C), increasing from 38.67 N in 5 min to 152.67 N in 20 min, especially in the range of 15–20 min. This change may be due to heat denaturation of myofibrillar protein at elevated temperatures, which leads to enhanced cross-linking between the fibers and protein, and at the same time, the massive loss of water jointly aggravates the texture hardening process (31–33).

The color value change trend is shown in Figure 1D. The L^* value of the air-fried meat slices increased significantly during the initial 0–5 min (P < 0.05), which was presumed to be due to the changes in muscle microstructure caused by protein thermal denaturation, which increased light reflection (34, 35), and then continued to decrease for 5–20 min, resulting in the surface darkening of the meat slices, which was attributed mainly to the synergistic effect of the Maillard reaction and caramelization (36). The a^* value generally tended to increase (P < 0.05), with a very notable increase from 10–15 min, which may be related to the pigment concentration effect caused by the massive production of reddish-brown products in the middle of the Maillard reaction and the complete evaporation of surface water. The increase in the b^* value at 0–15 min reflects the accumulation of yellow intermediate products in the early stage of Maillard, whereas the decrease at 15–20 min may be due to the masking effect of dark melanoids produced by excessive browning of yellow tones. According to the variation characteristics of each parameter, the a^* and b^* values reached a high level synchronously in the 10–15 min period. At this time, the meat slices presented an ideal red and yellow composite color, which was the best color development stage of the air frying process.

Sensory evaluation results (Figure 1E) revealed that during air-frying, the overall sensory quality of Andrias davidianus meat slices first increased but then decreased with prolonged heating. At 0 min (raw sample), all the sensory scores were relatively low (color 3.9, smell 3.9, texture 3.3, taste 3.4, and overall acceptability 3.7), reflecting the unprocessed state of raw meat with undeveloped flavor and texture. After 5 min of air-frying, both color and aroma improved markedly (approximately 5.0), and the texture and taste were enhanced, indicating that short-term heating began to generate attractive sensory characteristics. At 10 min, all attributes increased significantly (approximately 6–7 points), as the Maillard reaction and caramelization contributed to a richer flavor and a tender-crisp texture, resulting in a noticeable increase in overall acceptability. The highest sensory scores were observed at 15 min (color 7.4, smell 7.6, texture 7.1, taste 7.2, overall acceptability 7.3), characterized by a golden color, full aroma, and a crispy yet juicy texture. At 20 min, some attributes slightly declined (color 6.7, texture 6.6, taste 6.5), possibly due to mild bitterness or hardness caused by overfrying, although smell (6.9) and overall acceptability (7.0) remained at relatively high levels. Overall, the optimal sensory quality of air-fried Andrias davidianus meat slices was achieved between 10 and 15 min, whereas longer frying durations may lead to quality deterioration. The sensory evaluation was conducted by trained panelists through repeated tests, ensuring good consistency and reliability (20, 23). Future studies could expand the sample size and incorporate consumer testing to further validate product acceptability.

3.2 3D and 2D spectra of VOCs from AF giant salamander meat at different durations via HS-GC–IMS

HS-GC–IMS technology was employed to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in giant salamander meat after five different durations of air frying (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min). Figure 2A shows the distribution of VOCs in the samples at each time point. The order of the sample arrangement from left to right corresponds to the different durations of air frying. The seat axes represent the removal time (X-axis), reservation time (Y-axis), and semaphore crown intensity (Z-axis), and the color gradient reflects the difference in ion intensity (37).

Figure 2

Figure 2. HS-GC–IMS spectra of giant salamander meat with different frying durations. (A) 3D map; (B) 2D map; (C) 2D difference spectrum.

The three-dimensional map is projected to the retention time migration time plane to obtain a two-dimensional dot matrix map (Figure 2B). Taking the 0-min non-air-fried sample as the benchmark, the spectrum of the additional samples was subtracted and analyzed to acquire a disparity map (Figure 2C), which makes it relatively easy to contradistinguish the subtle variations in volatile substances between the meat of giant salamanders with different durations of air frying. In the comparison diagram, the hue represents the strength of the volatile chemical signal, the white area shows that the density of the object sample is consistent with that of the reference sample, the blue region indicates that the concentration of the target sample is weaker than that of the reference, and the red area indicates that the density is higher than that of the contrast. The figure shows that with increasing duration of air frying, the kinds and relative components of VOCs in the meat samples from the giant salamander significantly changed dynamically, indicating that HS-GC–IMS technology can separate VOCs effectively in various periods.

3.3 Fingerprint analysis of VOCs in giant salamander meat at different AF durations

The retention indices of the volatile compounds were estimated by constructing a calibration curve with external standards (n-ketones C4–C9) on the basis of their retention times and corresponding retention indices. The qualitative analysis of volatile compounds was subsequently performed by matching the experimentally determined retention index and detection time (IMS) against the built-in databases of the VOCal software (27). A total of 51 signal peaks (comprising monomers and dimers) were discovered in five samples at different durations, and 48 VOCs were determined, encompassing 13 aldehydes, 11 alcohols, 10 esters, 6 ketones, 3 acids, 3 terpenes, and 2 sulfides.

The retention index (RI), retention time (RT), detection time (DT), and relative content of each VOC are listed in Table 1. The greatest increase was found in butanone overall, followed by acetic acid D, ethyl acetate D, isopentyl alcohol D, and acetic acid M. In terms of flavor dynamic evolution, different VOCs exhibited widely disparate patterns. The alcohols n-hexanol D and (E) 3-hexen-1-ol D, for example, decayed progressively with time, although isopentyl alcohol and hexanal tended to accumulate continuously.

Table 1

Table 1. Volatile organic compounds identified in giant salamander meat.

Through spatiotemporal visualization analysis of the HS-GC–IMS fingerprints (Figure 3), the five groups of samples presented characteristic flavor evolution tracks during the 0–20 min air frying process. The contents of diallyl disulfide (D and M), 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (D and M), and a variety of esters (ethyl 2-methyl propanoate (D and M), methyl 2-fluoroate, ethyl acetate (D and M), isobutyl propionate, ethyl 2-hydroxy propanoate, and methyl benzoate) were relatively high in the 0 min sample (yellow box). The contents of ethyl levulinate (D and M), benzyl alcohol, 2,3-butanediol, hexan-2-one, hexanoic acid, and terpenoids (limonene, camphene, and pinene) were relatively high in the 5-min treatment group (blue box). After 10 min (red box), the samples entered the aldehyde ketone-dominant stage, and the contents of octanal (D and M), heptanal (D and M), benzaldehyde, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, 1-octen-3-ol, and hexanal (D and M) were high. The green box samples, which were treated for 20 min, presented elevated levels of 2-furfural, 2-acetylfuran, 3-methylbutanal (D and M), 2-methylbutanal (D and M), and 2-heptanone (D and M). These giant salamander meats, which have different durations of air frying, have different flavor characteristic substances, which may affect the overall volatile flavor characteristics associated with various durations of frying.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Fingerprints of volatile organic compounds of giant salamander meat with different durations of air frying by HS-GC–IMS: the vertical axis of the map represents the air frying durations (from top to bottom: 0 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, and 20 min), and the horizontal axis corresponds to specific VOCs. Some substances are marked with D and M, representing monomers and dimers of the same compound, and unidentified peaks are represented by numbers.

3.4 Qualitative analysis of VOCs in giant salamander meat with different durations of AF

To clearly illustrate the evolution of volatile components in Andrias davidianus meat during air-frying, the fingerprinting signal intensities were normalized by peak area, and the relative contents of various volatile compounds were visualized as percentage-stacked bar charts (Figure 4A). Before air-frying, the major volatile compounds were acids (26.95%), esters (23.82%), ketones (20.72%), and sulfides (17.23%), followed by alcohols (6.52%), terpenes (2.80%), and aldehydes (1.97%). With prolonged frying, the relative contents of aldehydes and ketones continuously increased, reaching 7.78% and 34.45% at 20 min, respectively, indicating intensified lipid oxidation. In contrast, the relative abundances of esters and sulfides markedly decreased to 6.91% and 2.58%, respectively, at 20 min, suggesting their degradation or transformation during thermal reactions. Acids exhibited a rise-then-fall pattern, peaking at 15 min (39.64%), which was likely associated with fatty acid release and intermediate accumulation. The proportions of terpenes and alcohols fluctuated only slightly (variation < 4%). Overall, air-frying accelerated lipid oxidation and degradation, resulting in a notable increase in aldehydes and ketones, which play critical roles in the development of meaty and roasted aromas, whereas ketones may also help reduce the characteristic fishy odor of aquatic meat products (38–40).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Dynamic changes in volatile flavor compounds of Chinese giant salamander meat during air frying: (A) relative content of volatile components; (B) cluster heatmap of flavor compounds.

Cluster analysis of 48 volatile compounds (Figure 4B) further revealed the dynamic evolution of flavor profiles. The heatmap, visualized in a red-to-blue gradient, represents high and low relative concentrations, respectively. The clustering results revealed that the 0 min and 5 min samples were closely related, retaining most of the raw meat's characteristic volatiles. The samples at 10 and 15 min clustered together, indicating similar VOC distributions and a more balanced aroma profile at this stage. In contrast, the 20 min sample formed a distinct cluster due to intense thermal reactions, characterized by caramelized and roasted notes. Specifically, esters such as ethyl 2-methylpropanoate D, ethyl 2-hydroxypropanoate, and ethyl acetate D, along with sulfide compounds such as diallyl disulfide (D and M), were abundant at early frying stages (0–5 min), contributing fruity and garlic-like aromas. Moreover, thermal degradation products and Maillard reaction products such as 2-heptanone (D and M) and 3-methylbutanal (D and M) accumulated significantly between 10 and 20 min, reaching peak concentrations at 20 min and imparting caramel-like aromas. Collectively, the samples fried for 10–15 min maintained their original freshness while generating moderate thermal reaction products, leading to a well-balanced aroma structure consistent with optimal sensory quality. However, excessive oxidation and pyrolysis at 20 min resulted in heavier, caramelized flavors.

3.5 Principal component analysis and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis of giant salamander meat at different AF durations

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a method for recognizing patterns without supervision that uses linear dimension reduction technology for multivariate data analysis (4, 41). Feng et al. (42) applied PCA to analyze VOCs when studying the consequences of vacuum belt drying on the flavor of honey powder at different temperatures and successfully distinguished samples at different drying temperatures, indicating the effectiveness of PCA in food flavor analysis. Therefore, this method can be used to determine the diversity in the variations in VOCs in giant salamander flesh instances with diverse durations of air frying. PCA involves the first two principal components of PC1 and PC2, and the contribution rate of each principal component represents its degree of interpretation of the overall data variance (43). Figure 5A shows that the first principal component (PC1) and the second principal component (PC2) contributed 56.17% and 31.59% of the diversification, respectively, with an overall contribution rate of 87.76%, indicating that PC1 and PC2 can effectively summarize the core change features of VOCs during frying. As shown in Figure 5A, five kinds of giant salamander meat samples with different frying durations formed a distribution in the PCA diagram, and the samples at each time point were closely clustered, indicating that the volatile components in the group were relatively stable. Moreover, the distance between samples at each time point was large, and there was no obvious overlap, indicating that the VOCs of giant salamander meat changed significantly with increasing air frying time.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Multivariate statistical analysis of different frying durations points of giant salamander meat (A) PCA scores; (B) OPLS-DA model validation diagram; (C) permutation analysis test.

To further screen the characteristic markers and evaluate the effects of different volatile substances on giant salamander meat samples at different frying durations, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was also employed for in-depth analysis. Combined with orthogonal signal correction technology, this method can effectively remove irrelevant information and improve the discrimination ability and prediction accuracy of the model (44). OPLS-DA was performed on 48 volatile components to study the differential aroma compounds among samples with different frying durations. In Figure 5B, the fit index of the independent variable (R²_x) was 0.985, the fit index of the dependent variable (R²_y) was 0.997, and the forecasting capacity index (Q²) reached 0.975. R² and Q² were both >0.9, indicating that the model provides powerful elucidative power and sibylline robustness (45, 46) and can efficiently separate fried giant salamander meat samples in different periods on the basis of changes in volatile substances. To validate the reliability of the OPLS-DA model, 200 permutations were conducted. In each permutation, the sample grouping labels (Y variable) were randomly shuffled, and the OPLS-DA model was re-established to calculate the corresponding R² and Q² values. If the original model's R² and Q² values both significantly exceed the distribution of the permutation models and the Q² intercept of the permutation regression line falls within the negative range, this indicates that the model possesses robust stability and predictive capability, with no evidence of overfitting (47). Figure 5C shows that the R² regression line intersects the positive half-axis of the Y-axis, whereas the Q² regression line intersects at the negative half-axis, further substantiating the model's reliability and favorable predictive performance.

3.6 Analysis of key flavor substances

3.6.1 Identification of key flavor substances

On the basis of the GC–IMS fingerprint spectra, after the 48 volatile substances identified in the giant salamander meat samples from five different AF frying durations were visualized, and on the basis of the responsible OPLS-DA model, the variable importance in projection (VIP) values were evaluated, 22 essential flavor mixtures with VIP > 1 were screened out (Table 2). It can be alcohol ((E)-3-hexen-1-ol (D and M), 1-octen-3-ol, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (D and M), 2,3-butanediol), an aldehyde (benzaldehyde, heptanal (M), hexanal (D and M)), an ester (methyl benzoate, methyl 2-furoate, ethyl acetate (M), ethyl 2-hydroxy propanoate, ethyl 2-methyl propanoate (D and M), isobutyl propionate), a ketone (butanone, 2-heptanone (D and M)), or a sulfide (diallyl disulfide (D and M)). In Figure 6A, each point represents a compound. The horizontal position shows its VIP score. The color bar on the right (from green to red) reflects the relative peak volume, with red indicating a higher content and green indicating a lower content. Generally, variables with a VIP > 1 are considered to contribute tremendously to the samples, and the higher the VIP value is, the more important its influence on flavor differences (48). Yan et al. (49), on the basis of GC–IMS data, successfully identified 20 potential aroma-active volatile compounds via the VIP value screening method (VIP > 1), and these marker compounds effectively distinguished Hulatang samples from different production regions, indicating that the VIP-based screening method has high reliability in the identification of aroma volatiles. The PCA results of these 22 substances (Supplementary Figure S1) showed that the total contribution ratio of the first two principal components collectively reached 92.92%, indicating that they can effectively distinguish giant salamander meat samples with different frying durations. These findings further prove that the 22 kinds of volatile organic compounds screened have important influences on the flavor characteristics of giant salamander meat throughout the frying procedure.

Table 2

Table 2. Substances with a VIP >1 and their classification.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (A) VIP score of key volatile compounds identified by OPLS-DA; (B) Pearson correlation heatmap of VOCs with VIP 1.

3.6.2 Distribution characteristics of key flavor substances

Box plots were generated for the 22 volatile compounds identified (Figure 7) to analyze the differential temporal response patterns exhibited by substances across different chemical categories during air frying. Within each box plot, the median line indicates relative abundance, whereas the box height reflects data dispersion. Higher or more concentrated abundances indicate the formation or accumulation characteristics of a compound during specific stages.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Boxplot of 22 volatile organic compounds (according to the selection criterion of VIP 1).

At 0 min, three alcohols ((E)-3-hexen-1-ol D, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (D and M)), five esters (methyl benzoate, ethyl 2-hydroxypropanoate, isobutyl propionate, ethyl 2-methylpropanoate (D), methyl 2-furoate), and two sulfides (diallyl disulfide (D and M)) were present at significantly higher levels than in the other time periods, imparting the samples with fresh fruity and caramelized nutty sensory characteristics. Diallyl disulfide may originate from the garlic added during the pretreatment stage (50), whereas esters such as ethyl 2-hydroxypropanoate and methyl benzoate contribute a sweet and mellow aroma, building a multilayered odor foundation (51, 52). When the frying time reached 10 min, the concentrations of the lipid oxidation product 1-octen-3-ol and the Maillard reaction product benzaldehyde increased significantly, indicating that lipid oxidation had entered an active stage. 1-Octen-3-ol, derived from linoleic acid oxidation, imparts a mushroom-like aroma (53–55), whereas benzaldehyde is generated from phenylalanine degradation, presenting a nutty note (56). At this stage, the reactive carbonyl intermediates produced by lipid oxidation effectively promoted the Maillard reaction, driving the flavor system from initial accumulation toward a more complex baked aroma. By 15 min, the levels of aldehydes (heptanal M), ketones (butanone), and alcohols ((E)-3-hexen-1-ol M) continued to rise, increasing the baked attributes. Aldehydes, as low-threshold lipid oxidation products, contribute predominantly to meaty notes (57), whereas ketones and alcohols enhance flavor complexity with floral and fruity nuances (58, 59). At this point, the reaction system underwent a notable shift: lipid oxidation products interacted with protein amino groups through Maillard condensation and Strecker degradation to generate heterocyclic compounds with a roasted aroma, marking a key turning point in flavor evolution. At 20 min, hexanal M (green, fatty), 2-heptanone D and M (cheesy, nutty), and ethyl 2-methylpropanoate M (fruity) reached their peak levels, indicating that esterification (60) and lipid degradation (54) continued to intensify. The accumulation of 2-heptanone and hexanal confirms the dominant role of lipid degradation, whereas the thermal decomposition of Maillard intermediates and interactions among multiple components collectively generate nutty, roasted, and creamy aromas, forming a thermal reaction network consistent with that observed in other high-fat food systems (61–63).

The key flavor compounds mentioned above all presented VIP values > 1 in the OPLS-DA, and their dynamic trends were highly consistent with the clustering heatmap and sample appearance (Figure 1A). The samples fried for 10–15 min displayed a uniform light golden color, which corresponded well with the sensory descriptions of the mushroom and almond notes at 10 min and the roasted and floral aromas at 15 min (Figure 1E). Overall, these results indicate that 10–15 min is the optimal duration of air frying for giant salamander meat. During this period, the synergistic balance among lipid oxidation, Maillard reactions, and esterification produces the most desirable flavor profile.

3.6.3 Correlation analysis of key flavor substances

Pearson correlation analysis was performed on the VOCs with a VIP > 1 (Figure 6B), where green represents positive correlations and pink indicates negative correlations. The results revealed significant associations among the compounds, suggesting a coupling effect among lipid oxidation, Maillard reactions, and esterification pathways. For example, alcohols (such as 2-ethyl-1-hexanol and (E)-3-hexen-1-ol) are strongly positively correlated with esters (such as ethyl 2-methylpropanoate), indicating that esterification between oxidized fatty acid intermediates and alcohols is a major pathway for ester formation (61). Additionally, the strong correlations among aldehydes, ketones, and alcohols, which are typical lipid oxidation products, highlight the dynamic balance between oxidation, reduction, and condensation reactions (62). Significant positive correlations were also observed across compound classes (P ≤ 0.01), such as between the ester ethyl 2-methylpropanoate M and the ketone 2-heptanone D, implying that carbonyl compounds derived from lipid oxidation can serve as substrates for secondary esterification or condensation, demonstrating the interdependence between lipid oxidation and the Maillard reaction pathways. Notably, 2-heptanone, which contributes a cheesy and nutty aroma, is a product of lipid degradation (63) and is closely related to meat flavor formation (64).

Negatively correlated compounds reveal competitive relationships among different reaction pathways. For example, (E)-3-hexen-1-ol D and M were negatively correlated with hexanal M, ethyl acetate M, and 2-heptanone D and M, indicating that as air frying progresses, lipid oxidation increasingly shifts toward aldehydes and ketones, depleting early alcohol intermediates. Hexanal, a typical product of linoleic acid β-oxidation, is associated with fatty off-flavors (65), whereas (E)-3-hexen-1-ol, an early oxidation intermediate, decreases due to continuous transformation or volatilization. This inverse relationship underscores the intrinsic mechanism underlying the flavor transition from fresh to roasted notes. Similarly, the negative correlations among butanone, isobutyl propionate, and methyl 2-furoate reflect competition for substrates between lipid cleavage and esterification under high-temperature conditions (59).

These mechanistic interactions collectively indicate that during air frying, lipid oxidation, Maillard reactions, and esterification alternately dominate and mutually constrain each other, forming a dynamic network that ultimately shapes the flavor profile. This finding provides a theoretical basis for process optimization, suggesting that precise control of the reaction intensity or adjustment of precursor availability could effectively suppress undesirable flavors, thereby enhancing the overall sensory quality and market acceptability of air-fried giant salamander meat.

3.7 Analysis of key flavor substances in AF giant salamander meat via the ROAV method

The relative odor activity value (ROAV) is widely employed in food flavor research to evaluate the contribution of volatile components to overall aroma, offering greater scientific rigor than simple concentration analysis. Compounds with ROAVs ≥ 1 are generally considered characteristic aroma compounds of a sample (66). This study employed the method of Liu et al. (67) to calculate ROAV, identifying 38 differentially volatile compounds. The results revealed that the ROAV of a total of 15 compounds was ≥1 (Table 3), and they were determined to be key flavor substances, including 6 aldehydes (octanal (D and M), hexanal (D and M), and 3-methylbutanal (D and M)), 3 esters (ethyl 2-methylpropanoate (D and M) and methyl benzoate), 2 kinds of acids (acetic acid (D and M)), 2 kinds of alcohols (1-octen-3-ol and isopentyl alcohol D), and 2 kinds of sulfides (diallyl disulfide (D and M)).

Table 3

Table 3. Odor threshold and odor description of 15 volatile organic compounds with ROAV ≥ 1 in air at different frying duration points.

From a chemical classification and olfactory perspective, ester compounds (e.g., ethyl 2-methylpropanoate and methyl benzoate) mainly originate from acid–alcohol esterification reactions, imparting fruity and sweet aromas that become more active at elevated temperatures (68, 69). Aldehydes (hexanal D and M, octanal D and M, and 3-methylbutanal D and M) are typical lipid oxidation products widely present in thermally processed meats, and contribute to the characteristic fatty and fried aroma of cooked products (58, 70). Alcohols (e.g., isopentyl alcohol D and 1-octen-3-ol) arise partly from lipid oxidation but may also form via amino acid degradation through the Maillard or Strecker pathway, providing mushroom and alcoholic notes (58, 70, 71). Sulfur compounds (diallyl disulfide D) are derived from the thermal degradation of sulfur-containing amino acids, producing distinctive garlic-like aromas (72). These findings indicate that the flavor development of air-fried giant salamander meat is not governed by a single reaction but rather by the synergistic interplay among lipid oxidation, Maillard reactions, esterification, and sulfur-compound cleavage.

Dynamic trend analysis revealed phased responses of different odor-active components during frying. The initial concentrations of compounds such as hexanal M, octanal M, and 1-octen-3-ol gradually increased, indicating that continuous lipid oxidation and amino acid thermal reactions resulted in the accumulation of aroma products (73, 74). Methyl benzoate maintained a consistently high ROAV throughout the process, which is consistent with the stability of its esterification pathway (58). Hexanal D sharply increased at 5 min, indicating a critical point for fatty acid oxidation acceleration (75, 76). Collectively, these representative VOCs form a complex flavor network through multiple interactive routes, lipid oxidation, the Maillard reaction, esterification, and sulfur compound degradation, defining the unique sensory profile of air-fried giant salamander meat.

Notably, among the 15 key compounds with ROAVs ≥ 1, eight (1-octen-3-ol, hexanal D and M, ethyl 2-methylpropanoate D and M, methyl benzoate, and diallyl disulfide D and M) simultaneously presented VIP values > 1, confirming that they are not only critical variables distinguishing sample groups but also major contributors to sensory perception. These compounds thus serve as key process control targets for optimizing aroma structure and product quality. Future research may further validate their quantitative flavor contributions through reconstitution or sensory quantitative analysis, thereby elucidating the interactive mechanisms between lipid oxidation and Maillard reactions in air-frying flavor formation with greater precision.

4 Conclusions

In conclusion, the shear force and a^* value of the meat slices increased notably (P < 0.05) as the duration of frying increased (0–20 min), whereas the processing yield and L^* value decreased prominently. The b^* value peaked at 15 min. HS-GC–IMS identified 48 volatile substances. The relative contents of ketones and acids are high. PCA effectively distinguished flavor differences (cumulative contribution of 87.76%), and OPLS-DA identified 22 key volatiles (VIP > 1). ROAV analysis revealed 15 key odor-active substances (ROAV ≥ 1), with 8 volatiles having the characteristics of VIP > 1 and being able to be used as core targets to distinguish the duration of air frying from flavor quality, which is worthy of further analysis and discussion. Considering the comprehensive chemical and physical characteristics, volatile components, and multivariate statistical analysis, the optimal processing time for air-frying giant salamander slices at 180 °C is 10–15 min. Future studies may incorporate multiple batches of raw materials, increase sample sizes, and apply multiomics approaches (such as metabolomics and lipidomics) to systematically investigate the correlations between volatile compounds and nutritional components, thereby elucidating the synergistic regulatory mechanisms of flavor and nutrition during the frying process.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Shaanxi University of Technology. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

ZL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. KC: Data curation, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. HL: Data curation, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. HY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. YR: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. ZY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. WS: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Software, Validation. LX: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Software. WJ: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. AMA: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. RG: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the Scientific Project for Local Development of Department of Shaanxi Province (Grant Number: 25JC034), and the Foreign Expert Service Program of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant Number: 2025WZ-YBXM-45).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1649069/full#supplementary-material

References

1. He D, Zhu W, Zeng W, Lin J, Ji Y, Wang Y, et al. Nutritional and medicinal characteristics of Chinese giant salamander (Andrias Davidianus) for applications in healthcare industry by artificial cultivation: a review. Food Sci Hum Well. (2018) 7:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2018.03.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wang X, Zhang K, Wang Z, Ding Y, Wu W, Huang S. The decline of the Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus and implications for its conservation. Oryx. (2004) 2:197–202. doi: 10.1017/S0030605304000341

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Jin W, Chen X, Geng J, Jin J, Pei J, Gao R, et al. Quality characteristics and moisture mobility of giant salamander (Andrias Davidianus) jerky during roasting process. J Food Qual. (2021) 2021:9970797. doi: 10.1155/2021/9970797

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhao S, Yu J, Xi L, Kong X, Pei J, Jiang P, et al. Sex-specific lipid profiles and flavor volatiles in giant salamander (Andrias Davidianus) tails revealed by lipidomics and GC-IMS. Foods. (2024) 13:3048. doi: 10.3390/foods13193048

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Tao M, He D, Chen H, Zeng W, Wang J, Wang S, et al. Current status of the farming industry of Chinese giant salamander and development directions of health products from this amphibian: an analysis from the perspective of intellectual property rights. Food Sci. (2022) 43:364–72. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20210826-331

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Alfaifi BM, Al-Ghamdi S, Othman MB, Hobani AI, Suliman GM. Advanced red meat cooking technologies and their effect on engineering and quality properties: a review. Foods. (2023) 12:2564. doi: 10.3390/foods12132564

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bhuiyan Md, Ngadi MO. Air-frying of meat analog based parfried frozen batter coated foods. J Food Eng. (2024) 367:111844. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2023.111844

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Fang MC, Chin PSY, Sung WC, Chen TY. Physicochemical and volatile flavor properties of fish skin under conventional frying, air frying and vacuum frying. Molecules. (2023) 28:4376. doi: 10.3390/molecules28114376

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Chang C, Wu Gang, Zhang Hui, Jin Qing, Wang X. Deep-fried flavor: characteristics, formation mechanisms, and influencing factors. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2020) 60:1496–514. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1575792

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Aprea E. Special issue “volatile compounds and smell chemicals (odor and aroma) of food.” Molecules. (2020) 25:3811. doi: 10.3390/molecules25173811

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wang S, Chen H, Sun B. Recent progress in food flavor analysis using gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry (GC–IMS). Food Chem. (2020) 315:126158. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126158

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Liu N, Shen S, Huang L, Deng G, Wei Y, Ning J, et al. Revelation of volatile contributions in green teas with different aroma types by GC–MS and GC–IMS. Food Res Int. (2023) 169:112845. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112845

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Chen T, Qi X, Chen M, Lu D, Chen B. Discrimination of Chinese yellow wine from different origins based on flavor fingerprint. Acta Chromatogr. (2019) 332:139–44. doi: 10.1556/1326.2019.00613

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Li P, Zhou H, Wang Z, Al-Dalali S, Nie W, Xu F, et al. Analysis of flavor formation during the production of jinhua dry-cured ham using headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC–IMS). Meat Sci. (2022) 194:108992. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108992

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Liu J, Han L, Han W, Gui L, Yuan Z, Hou S, et al. Effect of different heat treatments on the quality and flavor compounds of black tibetan sheep meat by HS-GC–IMS coupled with multivariate analysis. Molecules. (2023) 28:165. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Moura PC, Vassilenko V. Gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry as a tool for quick detection of hazardous volatile organic compounds in indoor and ambient air: a university campus case study. Eur J Mass Spectrom. (2022) 28:113–26. doi: 10.1177/14690667221130170

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Liu Y, Al-Dalali S, Hu Y, Zhao D, Wang J, He Z. Effect of different processing steps in the production of beer fish on volatile flavor profile and their precursors determined by HS-GC–IMS, HPLC, E-nose, and E-tongue. Food Chem X. (2024) 23:101623. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101623

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Han M, Jiang X, Gui M, Liang Q, Gu Y, Song X, et al. Comparative study of volatile and non-volatile flavor substances in squid from multiple origins. Food Chem X. (2025) 27:102429. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102429

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Li Y, Yuan L, Liu H, Liu H, Zhou Y, Li M, et al. Analysis of the changes of volatile flavor compounds in a traditional Chinese shrimp paste during fermentation based on electronic nose, SPME-GC-MS and HS-GC–IMS. Food Sci Hum Well. (2023) 12:173–82. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2022.07.035

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jin W, Pei J, Chen X, Geng J, Chen D, Gao R. Influence of frying methods on quality characteristics and volatile flavor compounds of giant salamander (Andrias davidianus) meatballs. J Food Qual. (2021) 2021:8450072. doi: 10.1155/2021/8450072

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Li J, Tu Z, Zhang L, Sha X, Wang H, Pang J, et al. The effect of ginger and garlic addition during cooking on the volatile profile of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) soup. J Food Sci Technol. (2016) 53:3253–70. doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2301-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Neiva C, Machado T, Tomita R, Furlan E, Neto M, Bastos D. Fish crackers development from minced fish and starch: an innovative approach to a traditional product. Food Sci Technol. (2011) 31:973–9. doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612011000400024

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kim TK, Kim HW, Lee YY, Jang HW, Kim YB, Choi YS. Quality characteristics of duck jerky: combined effects of collagen and konjac. Poult Sci. (2020) 99:629–36. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez561

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Wereńska M. Effect of different sous-vide cooking temperature-time combinations on the functional and sensory properties of goose meat. Poult Sci. (2024) 103:103701. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103701

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Martín-Miguélez J, Olegario L, González-Mohino A, Ventanas S, Delgado J. Physicochemical, sensory, and safety evaluation of dry-cured fermented sausages and its plant-based meat analog. LWT. (2024) 208:116704. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116704

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Ruiz-Capillas C, Herrero AM. Sensory analysis and consumer research in new product development. Foods. (2021) 10:582. doi: 10.3390/foods10030582

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Jin W, Zhao S, Li J, Cheng K, Xi L, Pei J, et al. Unraveling Gender-specific lipids and flavor volatiles in giant salamander (Andrias Davidianus) livers via lipidomics and GC-IMS. Food Chem X. (2024) 23:101786. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101786

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Feng M, Dai Z, Yin Z, Wang X, Chen S, Zhang H. The volatile flavor compounds of Shanghai smoked fish as a special delicacy. J Food Biochem. (2021) 45:e13553. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.13553

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Li Y, Guo Q, Wang K, Nverjiang M, Wu K, Wang X, et al. Monitoring the changes in heat transfer and water evaporation of french fries during frying to analyze its oil uptake and quality. Foods. (2022) 11:3473. doi: 10.3390/foods11213473

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Lin HT, Chan DS, Huang YH, Sung WC. Kinetics of moisture loss and oil absorption of pork rinds during deep-fat, microwave-assisted and vacuum frying. Foods. (2021) 10:3025. doi: 10.3390/foods10123025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Alugwu SU, Okonkwo TM, Ngadi MO. Effect of cooking on physicochemical and microstructural properties of chicken breast meat. Eur J Nutr Food Saf. (2022) 14:43–62. doi: 10.9734/ejnfs/2022/v14i111264

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Shen Y, Guo X, Li X, Wang W, Wang S, Pan J, et al. Effect of cooking temperatures on meat quality, protein carbonylation and protein cross-linking of beef packed in high oxygen atmosphere. LWT. (2022) 154:112633. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112633

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Ishiwatari N, Fukuoka M, Sakai N. Effect of protein denaturation degree on texture and water state of cooked meat. J Food Eng. (2013) 117:361–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.03.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Hughes JM, Clarke FM, Purslow PP, Warner RD. Meat color is determined not only by chromatic heme pigments but also by the physical structure and achromatic light scattering properties of the muscle. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf . (2020) 19:44–63. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12509

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kim YHB, Warner RD, Rosenvold K. Influence of high pre-rigor temperature and fast pH fall on muscle proteins and meat quality: a review. Anim Prod Sci. (2014) 54:375–95. doi: 10.1071/AN13329

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Téllez-Morales JA, Rodríguez-Miranda J, Aguilar-Garay R. Review of the influence of hot air frying on food quality. Meas Food. (2024) 14:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.meafoo.2024.100153

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Hwang IM, Park B, Yang J S, Ha JH. Distinguishing between Long-term-stored and fresh chili pepper powder through fingerprinting of volatiles by headspace capillary-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry. J Food Sci. (2020) 85:4359–66. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15538

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Wang D, Zhang J, Zhu Z, Lei Y, Huang S, Huang M. Effect of ageing time on the flavour compounds in Nanjing water-boiled salted duck detected by HS-GC–IMS. LWT. (2022) 155:112870. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112870

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Xing L, Zhang W. Influences of Ultrasonic-assisted frying on the flavor characteristics of fried meatballs. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 62:102365. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102365

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Cui Z, Yan H, Manoli T, Mo H, Li H, Zhang H. Changes in the Volatile components of squid (Illex Argentinus) for different cooking methods via headspace–gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry. Food Sci Nutr. (2020) 8:5748–62. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1877

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Fu J, Sun Y, Cui M, Zhang E, Dong L, Wang Y, et al. Analysis of volatile compounds and flavor fingerprint using gas chromatography-lon mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) on crassostrea gigas with different ploidy and gender. Molecules. (2023) 28:4475. doi: 10.3390/molecules28114475

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Feng D, Wang J, He Y, Ji X, Tang H, Dong Y, et al. HS-GC–IMS detection of volatile organic compounds in acacia honey powders under vacuum belt drying at different temperatures. Food Sci Nutr. (2021) 9:4085–93. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2364

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Greenacre M, Groenen PJ, Hastie T, D'Enza AI, Markos A, Tuzhilina E. Principal component analysis. Nat Rev Methods Primers. (2022) 2:100. doi: 10.1038/s43586-022-00184-w

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Bangdiwala SI, Mohammad K, Maghsoudi H, Mohammadi, R. Compared application of the new OPLS-DA statistical model versus partial least squares regression to manage large numbers of variables in an injury case–control study. Sci Res Essays. (2011) 6:4369–77. doi: 10.5897/SRE10.1147

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wang K, Xu L, Xu Z, Wang X, Yang S. Analysis of metabolic markers in chilled chicken based on liquid chromatography-quadruple time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Sci. (2021) 42:293–303. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20200827-377

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Liu J, Zhao P, Wan X, Bie L, Jin W. Dynamic Changes of Volatile Organic Compounds in Giant Salamander Liver during the Deodorization with Tea Water Extract. Food and Machinery (2022) 38:8–17. doi: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2022.90011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Zhu J, Zhou L, Yao J, Hu Y, Li Z, Liu J, et al. Untargeted metabolomic analysis combined with chemometrics revealed the effects of different cooking methods on Lentinus edodes. Molecules. (2023) 28:6009. doi: 10.3390/molecules28166009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. He X, Yangming H, Górska-Horczyczak E, Wierzbicka A, Jeleń H. Rapid analysis of baijiu volatile compounds fingerprint for their aroma and regional origin authenticity assessment. Food Chem. (2021) 337:128002. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Yan J, Wang H, Yang B, Zhang W, Cao Z, Zhao P, et al. Characterization of the flavor profile of hulatang using GC-IMS coupled with sensory analysis. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1461224. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1461224

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Song X, Yue Z, Nie L, Zhao P, Zhu K, Wang Q. Biological functions of diallyl disulfide, a garlic-derived natural organic sulfur compound. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2021) 2021:5103626. doi: 10.1155/2021/5103626

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wu J, Chen R, Li X, Fu Z, Xian C, Zhao W, et al. Comprehensive identification of key compounds in different quality grades of soy sauce-aroma type baijiu by HS-SPME-GC–MS coupled with electronic nose. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:1132527. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1132527

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Pino JA, Espinosa S, Duarte C. Characterization of odor-active volatile compounds of jambolan [Syzgium Cumini (L) Skeels] wine. J Food Sci Technol. (2022) 59:1529–37. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05163-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Zhang J, Pan D, Zhou G, Wang Y, Dang Y, He J, et al. The changes of the volatile compounds derived from lipid oxidation of boneless dry-cured hams during processing. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. (2019) 121:1900135. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.201900135

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Zhang Q, Wan C, Wang C, Chen H, Liu Y, Li S, et al. Evaluation of the non-aldehyde volatile compounds formed during deep-fat frying process. Food Chem. (2018) 243:151–61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.121

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Xu Y, Zhang D, Chen R, Yang X, Liu H, Wang Z, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of flavor in charcoal and electric-roasted tamarix lamb by HS-SPME/GC–MS combined with electronic tongue and electronic nose. Foods. (2021) 10:2676. doi: 10.3390/foods10112676

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Franklin LM, Mitchell AE. Review of the sensory and chemical characteristics of almond (Prunus Dulcis). J Agric Food Chem. (2019) 67:2743–53. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06606

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Domínguez R, Pateiro M, Gagaoua M, Barba FJ, Zhang W, Lorenzo JM, et al. Comprehensive review on lipid oxidation in meat and meat products. Antioxidants. (2019) 8:429. doi: 10.3390/antiox8100429

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Bleicher J, Ebner EE, Bak KH. Formation and analysis of volatile and odor compounds in meat—a review. Molecules. (2022) 27:6703. doi: 10.3390/molecules27196703

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Han D, Deng S, Wang H, Huang F, Fauconnier ML Li H, et al. Lipid oxidation and flavor changes in saturated and unsaturated fat fractions from chicken fat during a thermal process. Food Funct. (2023) 14:6554–69. doi: 10.1039/D3FO01061A

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Cheng L, Wang Q, Li X, Huang X, An F, Luo Z, et al. Exploring the influence and mechanism of different frying methods on the flavor quality of low-salt sour meat. Food Chem X. (2024) 23:101591. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101591

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Mottram DS. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: a review. Food Chem. (1998) 62:415–24. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Whitfield FB, Mottram DS. Volatiles from interactions of maillard reactions and lipids. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (1992) 31:1–58. doi: 10.1080/10408399209527560

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Fu Y, Cao S, Yang L, Li Z. Flavor formation based on lipid in meat and meat products: a review. J Food Biochem. (2022) 46:e14439. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.14439

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Wu W, Zhou Y, Wang G, Zhu R, Ge C, Liao G. Changes in the physicochemical properties and volatile flavor compounds of dry-cured chinese laowo ham during processing. J Food Process Preserv. (2020) 44:e14593. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.14593

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Park MK, Kim BG, Kang MC, Kim TK, Choi YS. Distinctive volatile compound profile of different raw meats, including beef, pork, chicken, and duck, based on flavor map. Appl Food Res. (2025) 5:100655. doi: 10.1016/j.afres.2024.100655

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Zhong A, Chen W, Hu L, Wu Z, Xiao Y, Li K, et al. Characterisation of key volatile compounds in fermented sour meat after fungi growth inhibition. LWT. (2022) 165:113662. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113662

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Liu X, Zhang L, Sun H, Zhang Z, He P, Yang P, et al. Discrimination of different degrees of mildewed tobacco based on HS-GC–IMS technique. J Instrum Anal. (2024) 43:1433–41. doi: 10.12452/j.fxcsxb.24042901

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Li X, Xie W, Bai F, Wang J, Zhou X, Gao R, et al. Influence of thermal processing on flavor and sensory profile of sturgeon meat. Food Chem. (2022) 374:131689. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131689

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Wang Y, Wang X, Huang Y, Yue T, Cao W. Analysis of volatile markers and their biotransformation in raw chicken during staphylococcus aureus early contamination. Foods. (2023) 12:2782. doi: 10.3390/foods12142782

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Wang Y, Luo R, Wang S. Water distribution and key aroma compounds in the process of beef roasting. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:9786222. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.978622

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Kerth CR, Miller RK. Beef flavor: a review from chemistry to consumer. J Sci Food Agric. (2015) 95:2783–98. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Luo D, Tian B, Li J, Zhang W, Bi S, Fu B, et al. Mechanisms underlying the formation of main volatile odor sulfur compounds in foods during thermal processing. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf . (2024) 23:e13389. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13389

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Bai S, Wang Y, Luo R, Ding D, He B, Shen F. Characterization of flavor volatile compounds in industrial stir-frying mutton sao zi by GC-MS, E-nose, and physicochemical analysis. Food Sci Nutr. (2021) 9:499–513. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Shahidi F, Hossain A. Role of lipids in food flavor generation. Molecules. (2022) 27:5014. doi: 10.3390/molecules27155014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Liu X, Wang S, Tamogami S, Chen J, Zhang H. An evaluation model for the quality of frying oil using key aldehyde detected by HS-GC/MS. Foods. (2022) 11:2413. doi: 10.3390/foods11162413

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Grebenteuch S, Kroh LW, Drusch S, Rohn S. Formation of secondary and tertiary volatile compounds resulting from the lipid oxidation of rapeseed oil. Foods. (2021) 10:2417. doi: 10.3390/foods10102417

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar