Near-Infrared Spatial Self-Phase Modulation in Ultrathin Niobium Carbide Nanosheets

Introduction

Spatial self-phase modulation (SSPM) is one of the typical third-order optical processes [1, 2]. It provides a way to measure the non-linear refractive index and third-order non-linear susceptibility of a medium. Owing to their fascinating non-linear photonics applications [3, 4], tremendous efforts have been made to explore the non-linear optical properties of 2D materials including graphene [5, 6], transition metal chalcogenides (TMDCs) [7], black phosphorus [8–10], and MXenes [11, 12]. Previous studies report on SSPM in various 2D materials such as graphene [13], MoS₂ [14, 15], MoTe₂ [16], tellurium [17], NbSe₂ [18], and so on [19–26]. Over the past years, large-scale production of 2D materials has enabled their application in all-optical switches, all-optical modulators, and passive photonic diodes [27]. For example, excitation of the SSPM in MoS₂ allows one to achieve the two-color and high-contrast all-optical switching with a full contrast ratio, I_weak:I_strong = 1:60 [28]. Furthermore, non-reciprocal light propagation was observed in a solid-state graphdiyne/SnS₂-based photonic diode [27]. Thereafter, an all-optical information carrier and conversion system was designed to transmit/convert information [18, 19]. To gain insight into the underlying mechanism of SSPM, numerous theoretical investigations have been carried out to promote experimental research in this field of study [29, 30].

Intrinsically, 2D materials are attracting increasing attention due to their unique optical modulation in a visible region; however, experimental evidence of the infrared light response of the SSPM in 2D materials has been rarely reported so far [31]. In particular, the SSPM patterns of black phosphorus were successfully acquired by our group at a wavelength of 1,160 nm [32]. Very recently, the use of SSPM technique allowed one to measure the third-order non-linear susceptibility of Ti₃C₂T_x MXene within a visible-to-near-infrared (Vis–NIR) range (400–1,064 nm) [33]. The near-infrared region, especially presented by the optical communication band, is essential for all-optical modulation applications of the SSPM as it ensures the low-loss characteristics of the optical fiber communications.

Belonging to a class of two-dimensional (2D) inorganic compounds such as transition-metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, MXenes share a general formula of M_n+1X_n (n = 1–3), where M is an early transition metal (e.g., Ti, Zr, V, Nb, Ta, and Mo), and X is a C or N. As a new member of the MXene family, Nb₂C has attracted great attention due to its excellent performance in the fields of energy storage [34], electrochemical catalytic [35], and biomedicine [36]. Being semimetals with fascinating electrical properties, few-layer Nb₂C nanosheets exhibit a narrow optical bandgap which favors the infrared optical response. Moreover, their superior photothermal conversion efficiency in the infrared region has even been proven in photothermal cancer therapy [36].

In this work, we investigate the near-infrared SSPM response of few-layer Nb₂C nanosheets and expand SSPM response of 2D material to the communication band which cover 1,550 nm wavelength. The third-order non-linear susceptibility and the non-linear refractive index of Nb₂C were measured within a broadband range from 400 to 1,550 nm. Moreover, to understand the physics mechanism behind this, we exploited the dynamic formation process of SSPM diffraction rings. Based on the time of the rings formation, the dynamic formation process of SSPM diffraction rings can be divided into two typical time stages which correspond to the polarization and reorientation of 2D Nb₂C nanosheets. Further, we demonstrate the proof-of-concept Nb₂C non-reciprocal light propagation. During the exploitation of a passive photonic device, water was used instead of reverse saturable absorption materials [17, 27] to construct a Nb₂C/water asymmetric hybrid structure. This enabled us to achieve the non-reciprocal light propagation in the near-infrared region by a facile way.

Experimental

Synthesis of Nb₂C Nanosheets

The Nb₂AlC was purchased from 11 Technology Company Limited, the size of which is about 400 mesh. Ten grams of the bulk Nb₂AlC powder was added into 80 ml of a 40% HF solution (Macklin Incorporation). The suspension was then vigorously stirred for 48 h at 25°C. After that, the HF solution was removed and the multilayer Nb₂C was washed with water by centrifugation until the pH of water was about 5. The tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH) was then poured into Nb₂C and stirred for 72 h. Finally, the selected few-layer Nb₂C nanosheets were collected by centrifugation.

SSPM Measurements

The experimental setup is shown in Figure 2A. The light source is a mode-locked Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier system (Spectra-Physics, Spitfire ACE-35F-2KXP, Maitai SP, and Empower 30). Femtosecond laser pulse has a very short action time with materials, which cause a small thermal effect compared with continuous laser and long pulse laser (ns, ms). The transmitted light was captured by a charge coupled device (CCD) detector (LBP2-VIS2 was applied at wavelengths of 400, 800, and 1,300 nm; and LBP2-HR-IR2 at 1,550 nm).

Sample Characterization

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were captured by field-emission Magellan 400 microscope (FEI Company). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-angle annular dark field (HAADF), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) data were acquired on a JEM-3,100 (FEI Talos S-FEG) transmission electron microscope. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using a BRUKER D8 ADVANCE XRD system. The Ultraviolet-Visible-Near Infrared Rage (UV-Vis-NIR) absorption spectra from 200 to 1,600 nm of Nb₂C were measured by a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Cary60, Agilent). Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) image was captured by CSPM 5,500.

Results and Discussion

A typical two-step exfoliation strategy was employed to obtain Nb₂C nanosheets (see Experimental section). Briefly, the Nb₂AlC MAX phase was etched in hydrofluoric (HF) acid solution to remove the Al atoms. Ultrasound-assisted TPAOH co-intercalated exfoliation was effective to reduce the lateral size and the thickness of the obtained Nb₂C nanosheet [12]. Figure 1A shows the SEM images of Nb₂AlC powder. Before the HF etching, the MAX-phase Nb₂AlC had the particle size of several or tens of micrometers along with a high interlayer bond strength. Inset in panel A is the zoom-in images of the single Nb₂AlC particle which exhibits dense cross section. After the removal of Al atoms from the Nb₂AlC, the multi-layer Nb₂C was formed like an accordion pulled open, as shown in Figure 1B. As can be seen in Figure 1C, the AFM measurement of present few-layer Nb₂C was performed to characterize its thickness of about 3–4 nm. Figure 1d1 depicts the TEM images of Nb₂C nanosheets, revealing their transparent morphology and ultrathin structure. As shown in Figures 1d2–d4, HAADF and EDS mapping results of Nb₂C nanosheets with clear boundaries confirm the coexistence of Nb and C elements, which provides evidence for the elemental composition of as-prepared 2D Nb₂C nanosheets. Figure 1E displays the XRD patterns of samples. Two sharp peaks θ = 12.8 and 38.8° are observed in the case of Nb₂AlC, which is in good agreement with JCDS PDF#30-0033 for Nb₂AlC. The disappearance of the peak at θ = 38.8° indicates that the Al atoms have been successfully removed after etching in HF solution. The downshift of the peak at θ = 12.8° and its broadening mean that MAX is converted into MXene. Figure 1F shows the UV–Vis–NIR absorption spectra of Nb₂C (To note, the gap may attribute to be an error from instruments.) The abruptly enhanced near-IR absorption suggests a strong light-matter interaction within the near-infrared range.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. (A) SEM images of Nb₂AlC powder. Scale bars are 10 and 1 μm in (A) and inset. (B) SEM image of multilayer Nb₂C. Scale bar is 1 μm. (C) AFM image of Nb₂C. Scale bar is 200 nm. (D,d1) TEM image, and (d2) HAADF image. (d3,d4) are EDS mapping of few-layer Nb₂C nanosheets. Scale bars are 1 μm and 200 nm in (d1,d2). (E) XRD patterns of Nb₂C (upper) and Nb₂AlC (lower). (F) UV–vis–NIR absorption spectra of Nb₂C.

The SSPM measurements of Nb₂C nanosheets were carried out at four different wavelengths including the light communication band at 1,550 nm (Figure 2). The solvent we use is N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) which possessed low volatility, good thermal, and chemical stability. To exclude the influence of solvents to the formation of diffraction rings, the control group was set in which only the NMP solvent was contained for SSPM experiments. There are no diffraction rings for NMP at 400, 800, 1,300, and 1,550 nm. Figure 2A shows the experimental configuration used in the SSPM measurements. The typical SSPM diffraction patterns at different laser excitation wavelengths (from 400 to 1,550 nm) were captured by a CCD detector, as shown in Figures 2B–E. The distinguishable diffraction rings are observed at a wavelength of 1,550 nm, which indicates its potential versatility for optoelectronic applications within a range of a near-infrared telecom C band.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. (A) Experimental setup for SSPM measurements. (B–E) SSPM patterns at (B) 1,550 nm, (C) 1,300 nm, (D) 800 nm, (E) 400 nm. (F) Numbers of diffraction rings vs. incident beam intensity at four wavelengths.

The quantitative information about the non-linear optical response of Nb₂C is available from the third-order non-linear optical parameters that can be evaluated by fitting the experimental results in the context of the non-linear optical theory. The number of rings N is plotted in Figure 2F as a function of incident intensity I, and the linear relationship between both parameters is evident. According to the Kerr law, the refractive index of Nb₂C can be obtained as follows [1]:

$\begin{array}{ll}n=n_0+n_{2}I& (1)\end{array}$

where n₀ = 1.47 (NMP) and n₂ are the linear and non-linear refractive indexes, respectively, and I represents the laser beam intensity. When the laser beam passes through the Nb₂C suspension, the phase shift (ΔΨ) can be expressed as follows [1]:

$\begin{array}{ll}\Delta \psi =\frac{2\pi n_0}{\lambda }{\displaystyle {\int }_0^{L_{eff}}{n}_{2}I\left(r,z\right)dz}& (2)\end{array}$

where λ is the wavelength, L_eff is the effective optical thickness, rϵ[0,∞) is the radial coordinate, and I(r, z) represent the radial intensity distribution of a focused laser beam. The total number of rings N is determined by the formula ΔΨ(0)–ΔΨ(∞) = 2Nπ [1]. As for the Gaussian beam, the intensity at the center of the beam (I₀) is twice the average intensity I, which can be found experimentally. Then the effective thickness of the cuvette L_eff can be calculated from the following formula [1]:

$\begin{array}{ll}{L}_{eff}={{\displaystyle \int }}_{L_1}^{L_2}{\left(1+\frac{z^2}{z_0^2}\right)}^{-1}dz,\left(z_0=\frac{\pi {\omega }_0^2}{\lambda }\right)& (3)\end{array}$

where L₁ and L₂ are the distances from the focal point to the back and front surfaces of the quartz cuvette respectively, and L = L₂-L₁ is the thickness of the quartz cuvette. In our experiment, the focal length of the lens is f = 20 cm, L = 1 cm, and ω₀ is the waist radius of the laser beam. Therefore, the non-linear index n₂ can be defined as follows [37]:

$\begin{array}{ll}{n}_2=\frac{\lambda }{2n_0{L}_{eff}}·\frac{N}{I}& (4)\end{array}$

To gain insight into the intrinsic non-linear optical property of Nb₂C nanosheets, the third-order non-linear susceptibility ${\chi }_{\text{total}}^{(3)}$ can be described by the equation below [37]:

$\begin{array}{ll}{\chi }_{\text{total}}^{(3)}=\frac{c\lambda n_0}{2.4\times {10}^4{\pi }^2{L}_{eff}}·\frac{dN}{dI}& (5)\end{array}$

Then, ${\chi }_{\text{monolayer}}^{(3)}$ of Nb₂C can be obtained as follows [37]:

$\begin{array}{ll}{\chi }_{\text{total}}^{(3)}={\chi }_{monolayer}^{(3)}·A_{eff}^2& (6)\end{array}$

The number of layers A_eff can be found as [28], where ρ = 0.00286 mol/L is the Nb₂C concentration, and V = 4 × 10⁻³ L. The number of molecules in a single layer m = 1 × 4 cm²/(sin60°) × (6.302)² Ų = 1.83 × 10¹⁶. Hence the number of layers is A_eff = 374.

The experimentally measured non-linear optical parameters of different 2D materials are summarized in Table 1. The superior non-linear refractive response of Nb₂C at 1,550 nm is a unique and attractive result. The intrinsic third-order non-linear optical susceptibility of an effective single layer reaches a value of 5.14 × 10⁻⁹ e.s.u. at 1,300 nm and 3.73 × 10⁻⁹ e.s.u. at 1,550 nm.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Third-Order non-linear optical parameters of different 2D materials.

As can be seen in Table 1, Nb₂C possesses relatively high values of non-linear parameters within the near-infrared range. Using femtosecond laser pulses allows one to greatly suppress the thermal effects that may arise during the formation of the diffraction ring patterns due to spatial self-phase modulation [38, 39]. Non-local electronic coherence is a common mechanism to explain spatial self-phase modulation, which is also known as wind-chime model. However, since the optical bandgap of few-layer Nb₂C nanosheets is found to be 0.81 eV [12], the single-photon energy at 1,550 nm is not high enough to excite electronic transitions. The parallel-band absorption effects [40] induced two-photon absorption has been discovered in present metallic Nb₂C nanosheets. Therefore, the two-photon SSPM is the most likely mechanism responsible for the emergence of the below-gap SSPM [28]. When the two-photon absorption establishes a new electric field polarization, the excited carriers will diffract with photons not only above but also below the bandgap [28].

After exploring the formation mechanism of the diffraction ring patterns within the near-infrared wavelength range, we were focused on the investigation of the dynamic formation process of Nb₂C. Figures 3A–D depict the SSPM diffraction patterns acquired using a high-speed CCD detector at different time points and a laser excitation wavelength of 1,300 nm. First, the incidence of the laser beam on a sample leads to its self-focusing (Figure 3A). Then the SSPM-induced diffraction rings appear (Figure 3B). Their number increases rapidly until it becomes maximum. Finally, there is the downward collapse of the upper part of the pattern, forming a perpendicular (asymmetric) stable pattern. Maintaining the same beam incidence conditions, we also obtained the number of rings as a function of the dynamic formation time in Figures 3E–H.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. (A–D) Formation process of SSPM patterns at (A) 0 s, (B) 0.07 s, (C) 0.53 s, (D) 1 s at a wavelength of 1,300 nm (laser beam intensity I = 31.8 W/cm²). (E–H) Number of rings N changing with the time at a wavelength of (E) 1,550 nm, (F) 1,300 nm, (G) 800 nm, (H) 400 nm, respectively.

The time required for the diffraction ring formation is found to be almost independent of the incident beam wavelength. A schematic illustration of the time of the rings formation is shown in Figure 4. The first part is the polarization process (t₀-t₁ in Figure 4) in which the electrons and holes of the nanosheets move in opposite directions when the laser passes through the sample, causing the nanosheets to be polarized [37]. Such a polarization process can be attributed to the nonlocal electron coherence when there is an interaction between 2D nanosheets and light-induced electromagnetic field. The second part is the reorientation process (t₁-t₂ in Figure 4) in which the polarized fragments are rearranged under the force of an electric field. During the reorientation process, non-local electron coherence among the 2D nanosheets will be formed gradually. Such a non-local electron coherence-induced formation of typical SSPM diffraction rings have been observed in MoS₂ system previously [28]. In terms of the response time, the excited carriers generation and 2D nanosheets polarization will appear in the first part which corresponds to a timescale of about a picosecond or even a femtosecond. Considering the second part, there is typical interaction between polarized 2D nanosheets and Newton fluid with constant viscosity coefficient under the laser incidence. This process is a relatively slow one (about millisecond) and will be influenced by many parameters including viscosity coefficient of solvent, size of the 2D nanosheets, and incident laser power [28].

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the time required for the diffraction ring formation. The time can be divided into two parts. The t₀ indicates the laser start to incident on the medium. The polarization of 2D nanosheets finished in t₀-t₁ region. The reorientation of 2D Nb₂C occurs in t₁-t₂ time zone. t₀-t₂ time zone represents the time of the diffraction ring formation. t₂ diffraction rings become maximum.

Taking into account the advantage of the SSPM response of Nb₂C, non-reciprocal light propagation was designed as a proof-of-concept nanophotonic device. To construct asymmetric composite film system with non-reciprocal light transmission property, the composite films always contain a saturable absorption layer and a reverse saturable absorption material layer [41]. In the Kerr non-linearity-based, non-reciprocal light transmission work, the energy absorption of the incident light is the most important function of the reverse saturable absorption material layer [27]. We use the water to replace these reverse saturable absorption materials to construct an asymmetric composite film system. As we know, water has the advantages of stable physical and chemical properties and is environmentally friendly. Furthermore, water is low-cost and can be procured everywhere. When the laser beam passes forward (Nb₂C/water), the SSPM diffraction rings will be excited due to a strong SSPM response of Nb₂C caused by the Kerr effect. In other words, its large non-linear refractive index modulates the phase of the laser beam. Thereafter, water just reduces the intensity of the laser but makes no difference to the number of rings. Figures 5A–D display the SSPM patterns collected at the backward movement of the laser beam through the Nb₂C/water hybrid structure at different beam intensities and a wavelength of 1,300 nm. However, when the laser passes backward, water reduces the incident light intensity that is small enough not to excite diffraction rings in the Nb₂C layer due to its strong absorption in the near-infrared range. Figures 5E,F summarize the results of non-reciprocal light propagation for a Nb₂C/water hybrid structure at wavelengths of 1,300 and 1,550 nm, where it easily observes the unidirectional excitation of the diffraction rings. This discovery not only enabled one to find a new medium for the non-reciprocal light propagation implementation, but also to broaden the insight into the non-linear optical devices operating within the near-infrared range (especially at 1,550 nm).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. (A–D) SSPM patterns (acquired at the forward advancement of the laser beam) of a Nb₂C/water hybrid structure at a wavelength of 1,300 nm and laser beam intensities of (A) 3.5 W/cm², (B) 10.6 W/cm², (C) 21.2 W/cm², (D) 31.8 W/cm². (E,F) Number of diffraction rings vs. laser beam intensity at (E) 1,300 nm and (F) 1,550 nm at the forward (backward) movement of a laser beam through the hybrid structure. The inserted images explain the beam incidence direction.

Conclusion

In summary, few-layer Nb₂C nanosheets have been synthesized and their non-linear optical characteristics were measured via the SSPM technique within a near-infrared broadband range. The few-layer Nb₂C nanosheets were shown to exhibit excellent non-linear optical response and their non-linear refractive index was as high as 9.53 × 10–6 cm²/W at 1,550 nm. Moreover, in order to understand the physics mechanism behind it, dynamic formation process of SSPM diffraction rings was exploited. Based on the time of the rings formation, the dynamic formation process of SSPM diffraction rings can be divided into two typical time parts which correspond to the polarization and reorientation of 2D Nb₂C nanosheets. Finally, the non-reciprocal light propagation was implemented through a Nb₂C/water hybrid structure, giving a strong boost to research in the field of non-linear nanophotonic applications.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

SX and JH conceived the idea. Y-wW, Y-lD, Y-dW, and LZ prepared the 2D material and conducted the characterization of 2D material. Y-lH, X-jZ, and SX performed SSPM measurement of 2D material and analyzed results. All authors involved in the discussion and manuscript writing.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61875232, 61874141, and 11904239).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Durbin SD, Arakelian SM, Shen YR. Laser-induced diffraction rings from a nematic-liquid-crystal film. Opt Lett. (1981) 6:411–3. doi: 10.1364/OL.6.000411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wu L, Yuan X, Ma D, Zhang Y, Huang W, Ge Y, et al. Recent advances of spatial self-phase modulation in 2D materials and passive photonic device applications. Small. (2020) 16:2002252. doi: 10.1002/smll.202002252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Yu S, Wu X, Wang Y, Guo X, Tong L. 2D materials for optical modulation: challenges and opportunities. Adv Mater. (2017) 29:1606128. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sun Z, Martinez A, Wang F. Optical modulators with 2D layered materials. Nat Photonics. (2016) 10:227–38. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.15

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bao Q, Zhang H, Wang Y, Ni Z, Yan Y, Shen ZX, et al. Atomic-layer graphene as a saturable absorber for ultrafast pulsed lasers. Adv Func Mater. (2009) 19:3077–83. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200901007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wang Y, Mu H, Li X, Yuan J, Chen J, Xiao S, et al. Observation of large nonlinear responses in a graphene-Bi2Te3 heterostructure at a telecommunication wavelength. Appl Phys Lett. (2016) 108:221901. doi: 10.1063/1.4953072

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wang K, Wang J, Fan J, Lotya M, O'Neill A, Fox D, et al. Ultrafast saturable absorption of two-dimensional MoS2 nanosheets. ACS Nano. (2013) 7:9260–7. doi: 10.1021/nn403886t

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wang K, Szydłowska BM, Wang G, Zhang X, Wang JJ, Magan JJ, et al. Ultrafast nonlinear excitation dynamics of black phosphorus nanosheets from visible to mid-infrared. ACS Nano. (2016) 10:6923–32. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b02770

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wang Y, Huang G, Mu H, Lin S, Chen J, Xiao S, et al. Ultrafast recovery time and broadband saturable absorption properties of black phosphorus suspension. Appl Phys Lett. (2015) 107:091905. doi: 10.1063/1.4930077

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wang Y, Liu S, Zeng B, Huang H, Xiao J, Li J, et al. Ultraviolet saturable absorption and ultrafast carrier dynamics in ultrasmall black phosphorus quantum dots. Nanoscale. (2017) 9:4683–90. doi: 10.1039/C6NR09235G

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wang G, Bennett D, Zhang C, Ó Coileáin C, Liang M, McEvoy N, Wang JJ, et al. Two-photon absorption in monolayer Mxenes. Adv Opt Mater. (2020) 8:1902021. doi: 10.1002/adom.201902021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wang Y, Wang Y, Chen K, Qi K, Xue T, Zhang H, et al. Niobium-Carbide mxenes with broadband nonlinear optic response and ultrafast carrier dynamics. ACS Nano. (2020) 14:10492–10502. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c04390

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wu Y, Zhu LL, Wu Q, Sun F, Wei JK, Tian Y, et al. Electronic origin of spatial self-phase modulation: evidenced by comparing graphite with C60 and graphene. Appl Phys Lett. (2016) 108:241110. doi: 10.1063/1.4953827

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. He L, Ye J, Shuai M, Zhu Z, Zhou X, Wang Y, et al. Graphene oxide liquid crystals for reflective displays without polarizing optics. Nanoscale. (2015) 7:1616–22. doi: 10.1039/C4NR06008C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Xiao S, Ma Y, He Y, Wang Y, Xin H, Fan Q, et al. Revealing the intrinsic nonlinear optical response of a single MoS 2 nanosheet in a suspension based on spatial self-phase modulation. Photonics Res. (2020) 8:1725–33. doi: 10.1364/PRJ.399364

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hu L, Sun F, Zhao H, Zhao J. Nonlinear optical response spatial self-hase modulation in MoTe2: correlations between X(3) and mobility or effective mass. Opt Lett. (2019) 44:5214–17. doi: 10.1364/OL.44.005214

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wu L, Huang W, Wang Y, Zhao J, Ma D, Xiang Y, et al. 2D Tellurium Based High-Performance all-optical nonlinear photonic devices. Adv Func Mater. (2019) 29:1806346. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201806346

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Jia Y, Liao Y, Wu L, Shan Y, Dai X, Cai H, et al. Nonlinear optical response, all optical switching, and all optical information conversion in NbSe2 nanosheets based on spatial self-phase modulation. Nanoscale. (2019) 11:4515–22. doi: 10.1039/C8NR08966C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Shan Y, Wu L, Liao Y, Tang J, Dai X, Xiang Y. A promising nonlinear optical material and its applications for all-optical switching and information converters based on the spatial self-phase modulation (SSPM) effect of TaSe2 nanosheets. J Mater Chem C. (2019) 7:3811–6. doi: 10.1039/C9TC00333A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jia Y, Li Z, Saeed M, Tang J, Cai H, Xiang Y. Kerr nonlinearity in germanium selenide nanoflakes measured by Z-scan and spatial self-phase modulation techniques and its applications in all-optical information conversion. Opt Express. (2019) 27:20857–73. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.020857

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wang W, Wu Y, Wu Q, Hua J, Zhao J. Coherent nonlinear optical response spatial self-phase modulation in MoSe2 nano-sheets. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:22072. doi: 10.1038/srep22072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Li X, Liu R, Xie H, Zhang Y, Lyu B, Wang P, et al. Tri-phase all-optical switching and broadband nonlinear optical response in Bi2Se3 nanosheets. Opt Express. (2017) 25:18346–54. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.018346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Biswas S, Kumbhakar P. Measurement of large nonlinear refractive index of natural pigment extracted from hibiscus rosa-sinensis leaves with a low power CW laser and by spatial self-phase modulation technique. Spectrochim Acta A. (2017) 173:400–6. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2016.09.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Jia Y, Shan Y, Wu L, Dai X, Fan D, Xiang Y. Broadband nonlinear optical resonance and all-optical switching of liquid phase exfoliated tungsten diselenide. Photonics Res. (2018) 6:1040–7. doi: 10.1364/PRJ.6.001040

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wang G, Higgins S, Wang K, Bennett D, Milosavljevic N, Magan JJ, et al. Intensity-dependent nonlinear refraction of antimonene dispersions in the visible and near-infrared region. Appl Optics. (2018) 57:E147–53. doi: 10.1364/AO.57.00E147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Ji W, Chen W, Lim S, Lin J, Guo Z. Gravitation-dependent, thermally-induced self-diffraction in carbon nanotube solutions. Opt Express. (2006) 14:8958–66. doi: 10.1364/OE.14.008958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Wu L, Dong Y, Zhao J, Ma D, Huang W, Zhang Y, et al. Kerr nonlinearity in 2D graphdiyne for passive photonic diodes. Adv Mater. (2019) 31:1807981. doi: 10.1002/adma.201807981

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wu Y, Wu Q, Sun F, Cheng C, Meng S, Zhao J. Emergence of electron coherence and two-color all-optical switching in MoS2 based on spatial self-phase modulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2015) 112:11800–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504920112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Wang Y, Tang Y, Cheng P, Zhou X, Zhu Z, Liu Z, et al. Distinguishing thermal lens effect from electronic third-order nonlinear self-phase modulation in liquid suspensions of 2D nanomaterials. Nanoscale. (2017) 9:3547–54. doi: 10.1039/C6NR08487G

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Xiao S, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Wang Y, He Y, Zhang J, et al. Observation of spatial self-phase modulation induced via two competing mechanisms. Opt Lett. (2020) 45:2850–3. doi: 10.1364/OL.392689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Shi B, Miao L, Wang Q, Du J, Tang P, Liu J, et al. Broadband ultrafast spatial self-phase modulation for topological insulator Bi2Te3 dispersions. Appl Phys Lett. (2015) 107:151101. doi: 10.1063/1.4932590

CrossRef Full Text

32. Zhang J, Yu X, Han W, Lv B, Li X, Xiao S, et al. Broadband spatial self-phase modulation of black phosphorous. Opt Lett. (2016) 41:1704–7. doi: 10.1364/OL.41.001704

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

33. Li J, Zhang Z, Yi J, Miao L, Huang J, Zhang J, et al. Broadband spatial self-phase modulation and ultrafast response of MXene Ti3C2Tx (T=O, OH or F). Nanophotonics. (2020) 9:2415–24. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2019-0469

CrossRef Full Text

34. Du L, Duan H, Xia Q, Jiang C, Yan Y, Wu S. Hybrid charge-storage route to Nb2CTx MXene as anode for sodium-ion batteries. ChemistrySelect. (2020) 5:1186–92. doi: 10.1002/slct.201903888

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Pang SY, lo WF, Wong LW, Zhao J, Hao J. Efficient energy conversion and storage based on robust fluoride-free self-assembled 1D niobium carbide in 3D nanowire network. Adv Sci. (2020) 7:1903680. doi: 10.1002/advs.201903680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Lin H, Gao S, Dai C, Chen Y, Shi J. Two-Dimensional biodegradable niobium carbide (MXene) for photothermal tumor eradication in NIR-I and NIR-II bio-windows. J Am Chem Soc. (2017) 139:16235–47. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b07818

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Wu R, Zhang Y, Yan S, Bian F, Wang W, Bai X, et al. Purely coherent nonlinear optical response in solution dispersions of graphene sheets. Nano Lett. (2011) 11:5159–64. doi: 10.1021/nl2023405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Qi P, Su Q, Lu D, Lin L, Zhang N, Liu W. Optical nonlinearities of alcoholic liquids under high-repetition-rate femtosecond lasers by single beam time-resolved eclipsed Z-scan. Opt Laser Technol. (2019) 109:643–7. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.054

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Falconieri M, Salvetti G. Simultaneous measurement of pure-optical and thermo-optical nonlinearities induced by high-repetition-rate, femtosecond laser pulses: application to CS2. Appl Phys B. (1999) 69:133–6. doi: 10.1007/s003400050785

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Harrison WA. Parallel-band effects in interband optical absorption. Phys Rev. (1966) 147:467. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.147.467

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Anand B, Podila R, Lingam K, Krishnan SS, Sai SS, Philip R, et al. Optical diode action from axially asymmetric nonlinearity in an all-carbon solid-state device. Nano Lett. (2013) 13:5771–6. doi: 10.1021/nl403366d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar