Abstract
A narrow-linewidth laser with excellent temporal coherence is an important light source for microphysics, space detection, and high-precision measurement. An ultranarrow-linewidth output with a linewidth as narrow as subhertz has been generated with a theoretical coherence length over millions of kilometers. Traditional grating spectrum measurement technology has a wide wavelength scanning range and an extended dynamic range, but the spectral resolution can only reach the gigahertz level. The spectral resolution of a high-precision Fabry–Pérot interferometer can only reach the megahertz level. With the continuous improvement of laser coherence, the requirements for laser linewidth measurement technology are increasing, which also promotes the rapid development of narrow-linewidth lasers and their applications. In this article, narrow-linewidth measurement methods and their research progress are reviewed to provide a reference for researchers engaged in the development, measurement, and applications of narrow-linewidth lasers.
Introduction
Narrow-linewidth lasers with extremely low phase noise and a large coherence length have been widely used as a high-spectral-purity light source in gravitational wave detection [1, 2], optical atomic clocks [3, 4], lidar [5, 6], high-speed coherent optical communication [7, 8], and distributed optical fiber sensing [9, 10]. The main reason for the linewidth generation is the phase fluctuation caused by spontaneous radiation [11] and the noise induced by mechanical and temperature factors [12, 13]. Therefore, the laser linewidth reflects the physical and frequency stability of the laser. Scully and Lamb [14] proposed the laser quantum theory. They deduced that the spectral profile of the laser is Lorentzian and calculated its width (full width at half height). The linewidth value, an essential parameter of the laser, directly affects the accuracy of the narrow-linewidth laser in detection [15], sensitivity in sensing [16], and bit error rate in communication [17, 18]. Therefore, precise measurement of the linewidth value is a prerequisite for the application of narrow-linewidth lasers.
Different types of laser produce a broad coverage of linewidths, as large as tens of gigahertz [19, 20] and as small as subhertz [21, 22]. At present, the resolution of a commercial optical spectrum analyzer based on diffraction gratings is approximately 0.05 nm (gigahertz level)1, and the resolution of Fabry–Pérot interferometers can reach a few megahertz2. The rapid development and application of narrow-linewidth lasers have resulted in higher requirements for laser linewidth measurement technology. Specific devices must be built for lasers with a narrower linewidth (sub-megahertz) to measure the linewidth. In the past few decades, laser frequency stabilization [23, 24] and mode selection [25] have matured, and many narrow-linewidth measurement schemes are constantly being updated.
In this article, typical methods for measuring narrow-linewidth lasers are reviewed, and the characteristics of each method, as well as the status of its development, are summarized. Finally, a summary and an outlook for the future development of narrow-linewidth measurements are provided.
Narrow-Linewidth Laser Measurement Method
Two methods are mainly used for linewidth measurement: directly calculating the laser linewidth using the power spectrum density (PSD) of the laser and deducing the linewidth indirectly based on the relationship between the phase noise and linewidth. The power spectrum contains more-intuitive linewidth information, and it is relatively easy to obtain; therefore, a large proportion of linewidth measurement experiments focus on the former. Optical beat notes are necessary to obtain the PSD. The mixed signal of two incoherent lasers, each with a Lorentzian line shape, still has a Lorentzian line shape, and the PSD of the beat notes can be expressed as [26].where , is the linewidth of the tested laser, is the linewidth of the reference laser, and is the difference between the output frequencies of the two lasers mentioned above (also the center frequency of the beat notes). Two lasers with the same or similar frequencies interfere and produce a beat signal with a lower frequency. The linewidth of the beat signal is the sum of the widths of the two lasers participating in the beat. There are usually two cases of beat notes suitable for linewidth measurement, as shown in Figure 1A. If , the linewidth of the beat notes is twice the linewidth of the tested laser (, case 1). If , (that is, the output spectrum of the reference laser is exceptionally narrow and the linewidth can be ignored compared with the tested laser), the linewidth value of the beat signal is approximately the value of the linewidth of the tested laser (, case 2). These two cases are flexibly used in different measurement structures according to the specific conditions of the tested lasers. In this section, the focus is on four measurement structures based on the above two cases.
FIGURE 1
(A) Principle of optical beat notes, (B) beating note with a reference laser, (C) beating note with the Stokes wave of a Brillouin laser, (D) delayed self-homodyne interferometric detection, (E) delayed self-heterodyne interferometric detection, and (F) recirculating delayed self-heterodyne interferometer detection (PD, photodetector; ESA, electrical spectrum analyzer; RTC, resonance tracking circuit; PZT, piezoelectric transducer; AOM, acoustic optical modulator).
Beating Note With a Reference Laser
Figure 1B shows the measurement structure of using an additional laser to generate a reference laser beam and beating with the tested laser. The photodetector (PD) receives the mixed signal and transmits it to an electrical spectrum analyzer (ESA). Based on case 1, a laser with the same linewidth as the test is used to serve as the reference laser. In this case, any linewidth can be measured, but obtaining, measuring, and calibrating a reference laser is difficult. Based on case 2, using a reference laser whose linewidth value is negligible compared with the tested laser can meet the linewidth measurement requirements of most lasers; however, it is difficult to measure the ultranarrow linewidth in this case accurately. In addition, the two lasers participating in the beating should have the same amplitude, the same optical frequency (or a slight difference), and constant phase difference [27], which requires a stable experimental environment, increasing the difficulty and cost of testing.
Although this method has high requirements for the stability of the two lasers and the experimental environment, scientific researchers still favor it. In particular, ultranarrow-linewidth measurement based on case 1 does not require extra algorithm design, such as measuring the ultranarrow linewidth (see Delayed self-heterodyne interferometric detection), when analyzing beat notes. This avoids calculation errors, and the results are more convincing. In 1999, Young et al. [28] used a high-precision Fabry–Pérot cavity to realize a narrow-linewidth output. They built a second similar cavity for laser stability measurement (including linewidth measurement) and adjusted the laser frequency difference between the two cavities to 400 MHz to avoid low-frequency noise. They designed an independent vacuum chamber, temperature control system, and vibration isolation platform to ensure the stability of the two lasers. The measured linewidth was 0.6 Hz. In 2012, Kessler et al. [29] used two traditional cavity-stabilized lasers as reference laser sources to study a test laser. By analyzing the heterodyne signals among the three lasers, they concluded that the stability of the tested laser was the best, so the linewidth of the laser under test was the narrowest. The narrowest linewidth value obtained by the heterodyne signals between the tested laser and the other two lasers was 49 mHz, so they judged the linewidth of the tested laser to be less than 40 mHz. In 2013, Lee et al. [30] reported a chip-based resonator in the form of a spiral. It had a strong resistance to thermal noise and mechanical noise interference. Two identical fiber lasers were locked to the spiral resonator using a Pound–Drever–Hall locking system. The linewidth obtained by analyzing the beat notes of the two locked lasers was less than 100 Hz. In 2015, Liang et al. [31] built a laser identical to the tested laser to measure the narrow linewidth. They designed a thermal package and a sealed environment for the reference resonator to avoid technical noise caused by environmental and temperature fluctuations, and they concluded that the laser has an integrated linewidth of 30 Hz and a subhertz instantaneous linewidth. In 2018, Pavlov et al. [32] achieved a single-frequency output by using self-injection locking. They used a narrow-linewidth tunable fiber laser to perform heterodyne measurement with the tested laser and obtained a 340-Hz Lorentzian width and 1.7-kHz Gaussian width. According to Voigt linewidth theory [33], it was concluded that the laser linewidth was less than 1 kHz.
Beating Note With the Stokes Wave of Brillouin Laser
This approach does not require an additional reference laser, which solves the structural limitation that an additional laser must be used to provide a reference laser beam for linewidth measurement (see Beating note with a reference laser). As shown in Figure 1C, the tested laser was divided into two beams by a coupler. One beam is injected into the fiber ring cavity to form a Brillouin laser, and the other couples with the first-order Stokes wave propagating backward in the Brillouin laser. The coupling signal enters the PD to beat, and the beat note signal is fed into the ESA. The measurement principle is based on case 2. The tested laser is also the pump used to generate the Brillouin laser. The first-order Stokes beam linewidth of the Brillouin laser is usually much smaller than the pump linewidth, so the linewidth of the beat notes is approximately the linewidth of the tested laser (). Compared with the structure discussed in Beating note with a reference laser, this scheme only requires the tested laser to complete the linewidth measurement and makes testing easier. Generally, the Brillouin frequency shift reaches 10–20 GHz [34] in the optical fiber. This frequency shift is the frequency difference between the Stokes wave and the tested laser. It is also the center frequency of the beat notes. Therefore, a large Brillouin frequency shift causes the center frequency of the beat signal to exceed the measurement range of the ESA, which causes difficulties in the measurement. In principle, this scheme is only suitable for 1–500-kHz linewidth measurement [35]. When the linewidth of the tested laser is extremely narrow, this scheme is no longer applicable, and significant errors occur.
In 1991, Smith [36] verified the good linewidth compression effect of the Brillouin laser by building a Brillouin fiber ring laser. In 1994, Boschung [37] realized a 3.84-Hz linewidth Brillouin laser output in a fiber ring cavity by using an incident laser with a linewidth of 100 kHz. These works provide a theoretical and experimental foundation for the beating frequency with the Stokes wave of the Brillouin laser. In 1996, Kueng [35] built the measurement structure shown in Figure 1C for the first time and obtained a linewidth of 4.2 kHz. In 2005, Dong et al. [38] proposed a scheme using a second-order Stokes wave in the fiber ring as the reference beam, which further improved the accuracy of the Brillouin laser first-order Stokes optical beat method.
Delayed Self-Homodyne Interferometric Detection
The delayed self-homodyne interferometric structure is shown in Figure 1D, and the measurement principle is based on case 1. This structure is based on the unbalanced Mach–Zehnder interferometer (UMZI) [39]. It does not have the measurement range limitation of the structure in Beating note with the Stokes wave of Brillouin laser and has the advantages of a simple structure, wide measurement range, and low optical transmission loss. However, the center frequency of the beat notes is 0 Hz; therefore, the low-frequency noise in the environment interferes with the measurement results. Considering the sensing characteristics of the optical fiber [40], the disturbance of environmental noise, temperature, pressure, and other factors can seriously affect the test results obtained by the optical fiber [41].
In 1986, Ryu [42] found that this method has the advantages of simple setting and high resolution when measuring narrow-linewidth lasers. In 1989, Nazarathy [43] derived the photocurrent power spectral density for this structure. In 1998, Ludvigsen [44] reported an optimized delay homodyne method in which the photocurrent signal was amplified by a low-noise amplifier and mixed with a stable 200 MHz local oscillator in a double-balanced mixer. They obtained a 460-kHz linewidth value with only 71.7 m of fiber. Because of its poor stability, this structure has rarely been used for direct linewidth measurement in recent years, but it often appears in optical frequency discriminators (OFDs) for linewidth measurement. The measurement principle of OFDs is no longer based on case 1 or case 2, and the linewidth information is calculated from the noise spectrum. In 2019, Gundavarapu [45] et al. reported a narrow-linewidth Brillouin laser output on an integrated Si3N4 waveguide platform. They measured the linewidth based on an OFD using a fiber-based UMZI and a balanced PD (the PD in Figure 1D is changed to a balanced PD), and the linewidth value was calculated to be 0.7 Hz. In 2021, Chauhan [46] et al. reported a visible-light photonic integrated Brillouin laser, and the measured laser linewidth value was 269 Hz using an OFD.
Delayed Self-Heterodyne Interferometric Detection
Delayed self-heterodyne interferometry (DSHI) overcomes the shortcoming that delayed self-homodyne interferometric structures are susceptible to low-frequency noise. The measurement principle is based on case 1. As shown in Figure 1E, an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) is introduced to shift the center frequency of the beat notes to a high frequency that is not affected by the environment to reduce system errors and improve measurement accuracy. Nevertheless, the DSHI method to measure narrow-linewidth lasers must be completed under the condition that the delay time is much longer than the coherence time. In theory, to test a 100-Hz linewidth, the fiber length required is as much as 1,590 km [47]. The long optical fiber increases the experimental volume and attenuation and introduces 1/f noise that can cause spectral line broadening [48], which results in larger measurement errors. Moreover, when the output power of the tested laser is large, the long-delay fiber generates stimulated Brillouin scattering, which is opposite to the direction of laser transmission; in this case, the incident pump energy is converted into Stokes wave and sound wave energy, increasing the transmission loss and even making the PD unable to detect the signal. The DSHI method was first proposed by Okoshi [49] in 1980. In 1986, Richter [50] derived the power spectral density function of the beat notes under the DSHI structure and reported that the measurement result would be more accurate with a delay time much longer than the coherence time of the tested laser. The spectral line of the beat signal is generally fitted by a Lorentzian function [51]. To offset the influence of 1/f noise introduced by long optical fiber, Chen [33] proposed a fitting scheme based on the Voigt profile. The Voigt function is the convolution of the Gaussian and Lorentz functions [52, 53]. Using this function to fit the collected data can effectively filter out the influence of 1/f noise.
To remove the 1/f noise from the root, researchers have proposed a short-fiber delayed self-heterodyne interferometer strategy for linewidth measurement. When the fiber is short, the PSD function is no longer expressed by Eq. 1, and the complete PSD function is expressed as [49, 54].where is the power of the beat signal, is the laser linewidth, is the AOM modulation frequency, is the delay time (proportional to the fiber length), and is the impact function. According to the PSD function under a short optical fiber delay, different schemes have been designed to calculate the laser linewidth. In 2008, Jia [55] used polynomial fitting to eliminate the defect that caused the measurement accuracy to drop significantly when the delay time was insufficient and measured an 8-kHz linewidth with 25-km fiber. In 2015, Wei [56] obtained a numerical solution for the laser linewidth by measuring the frequency difference between the minimum points next to the maximum at the center frequency of the power spectrum. In principle, measuring a linewidth of 10 kHz requires only 300 m of delay fiber. In 2016, Huang [54, 57] reported an approach for contrasting the difference with the second peak and the second trough (CDSPST) of the coherence envelope to determine the laser linewidth. Only 3 km of fiber was used to measure a linewidth of 150 Hz. In 2018, Bai [58] successfully measured a laser with a linewidth of 98 Hz using the CDSPST method with a fiber delay of 2,950 m. In 2019, He [59] reported a linewidth demodulation scheme that achieved linewidth measurement by demodulating the coherent envelope of a short-delay self-heterodyne interference spectrum, and used this method to demodulate a 2.53-kHz linewidth. In 2020, Wang [60] reported a dual-parameter acquisition method and used it to calculate a 458-Hz linewidth by obtaining the frequency difference and amplitude difference of the coherence envelope. In 2021, Xue [61] reported a linewidth measurement method that combined long and short fibers. The measurement result of the long-delay fiber was used as the initial value, and the short-fiber self-heterodyne measurement results were demodulated. Xue used this method to demodulate a laser linewidth of 151 Hz successfully.
Other Measurement Methods
In addition to the above approaches, many other structures and optimization algorithms for narrow-linewidth laser measurements have been developed. The recirculating delayed self-heterodyne interferometer (RDSHI) method (see Figure 1F) is also widely used [62–65]. The unique fiber ring structure of this approach permits the delay fiber to increase the delay time by several times between two laser beams [66]. It is also an approach for improving the traditional DSHI method. Moreover, there is a close relationship between frequency noise and linewidth. Domenico et al. [67] proposed an approximate formula to show the relationship between the linewidth and frequency noise. Zhou et al. [68] reported a method to estimate the laser linewidth from its frequency power spectral density, called the “power-area method.” The β-separation line technique is an application of this relationship, which is convenient for calculating the laser linewidth after obtaining the laser frequency noise data [69]. Xu [70] et al.reported a method to measure the linewidth by using an unbalanced Michelson interferometer composed of a 3 × 3 optical fiber coupler. These structures can achieve a relatively accurate measurement of linewidth at a level of 1,000 Hz.
Conclusion and Outlook
Linewidth measurement technology is an essential part of the research and development process of narrow-linewidth lasers. Here, the typical methods for narrow-linewidth measurement were summarized, and the characteristics of various schemes were analyzed, as shown in Table 1. At present, measurement technology based on DSHI methods is developing rapidly, and its application is the most extensive among the methods. The method of beating notes with a reference laser is also used to test some ultranarrow-linewidth lasers owing to its excellent accuracy. The future renewal of linewidth compression technology is expected to place higher requirements on linewidth measurement technology. The RDSHI method has the advantages of the DSHI method. The multiorder beat signal measured by this scheme can avoid random errors and is expected to become the next research focus of narrow-linewidth measurement technology. In addition, Pollnau et al. [71, 72] questioned the traditional linewidth theory in recent studies, and they pioneered the theory that laser linewidth is a classical physics phenomenon, which may have an impact on linewidth measurement technology.
TABLE 1
| Type | Advantages | Disadvantages | Linewidth | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beating note with a References laser | 1. Easy to calculate | 1. Two independent lasers are required | 0.6 Hz | [28] |
| 2. The measurement results are accurate (especially measuring ultranarrow linewidth according to case 1) | 2. The References laser should be adjusted according to the tested laser | 40 mHz | [29] | |
| 100 Hz | [30] | |||
| 30 Hz | [31] | |||
| 3. Obtaining, measuring, and calibrating the References laser is complicated | <1 kHz | [32] | ||
| Beating note with the Stokes wave of Brillouin laser | 1. Only one laser can complete the linewidth measurement | 1. The Brillouin frequency shift in the optical fiber exceeds the measurement range of some standard ESAs, which causes difficulties for the measurement | 4.2 kHz | [35] |
| 2. The linewidth can be measured within a certain range without adjusting the structure | 2. The Brillouin laser has a linewidth that makes the method unsuitable for the case where the linewidth of the tested laser is ultranarrow | |||
| Delay self-homodyne interferometric detection | 1. The structure is simple and easy to build | The measurement results are extremely susceptible to low-frequency noise | 460 kHz | [44] |
| 2. It can measure the linewidth within a certain range without adjusting the structure | 0.7 Hz (OFD) | [45] | ||
| 269 Hz (OFD) | [46] | |||
| Delayed self-heterodyne interferometric detection | 1. The structure is simple and easy to build | A long fiber introduces 1/f noise and causes spectral line broadening | 8 kHz | [55] |
| 2. It can measure the linewidth within a certain range without adjusting the structure | 150 Hz | [54] | ||
| 3. The measurement structure is stable and not susceptible to external interference | 98 Hz | [58] | ||
| 2.53 kHz | [59] | |||
| 458 Hz | [60] | |||
| 151 Hz | [61] |
Comparison of laser linewidth measurement methods.
Statements
Author contributions
ZB: Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Supervision. ZZ: Investigation, Writing—original draft. YQ: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. JD: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. SL: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. XY: Writing—review and editing. YW: Writing—review and editing, Supervision. ZL: Writing—review and editing, Supervision.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61905061, and 61927815), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (F2019202337), and National Defense Science and Technology Key Laboratory Foundation (6142107190308).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
AbbottBPAbbottRAdhikariR. LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory. Rep Prog Phys (2009) 72(7):076901. 10.1088/0034-4885/72/7/076901
2.
AbbottBPAbbottRAbbottTDAbernathyMRAcerneseFAckleyKet alObservation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys Rev Lett (2016) 116(6):061102. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
3.
BloomBJNicholsonTLWilliamsJRCampbellSLBishofMZhangXet alAn Optical Lattice Clock with Accuracy and Stability at the 10 −18 Level. Nature (2014) 506(7486):71–5. 10.1038/nature12941
4.
LudlowADBoydMMYeJ. Optical Atomic Clocks. Rev Mod Phys (2015) 87(2):637–701. 10.1103/revmodphys.87.637
5.
HostetlerCABehrenfeldMJHuYHairJWSchulienJA. Spaceborne Lidar in the Study of marine Systems. Annu Rev Mar Sci (2018) 10(1):121–47. 10.1146/annurev-marine-121916-063335
6.
YangFYeQPanZChenDCaiHQuRet al100-mW Linear Polarization Single-Frequency All-Fiber Seed Laser for Coherent Doppler Lidar Application. Opt Commun (2012) 285(2):149–52. 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.09.030
7.
GuanHNovackAGalfskyTMaYFathololoumiSHorthAet alWidely Tunable, Narrow-Linewidth III-V/silicon Hybrid External-Cavity Laser for Coherent Communication. Opt Express (2018) 26(7):7920–33. 10.1364/oe.26.007920
8.
ZhouKZhaoQHuangXYangCLiCZhouEet alkHz-Order Linewidth Controllable 1550-nm Single-Frequency Fiber Laser for Coherent Optical Communication. Opt Express (2017) 25(17):19752–9. 10.1364/oe.25.019752
9.
ZhuTHeQXiaoXBaoX. Modulated Pulses Based Distributed Vibration Sensing with High Frequency Response and Spatial Resolution. Opt Express (2013) 21(3):2953–63. 10.1364/oe.21.002953
10.
JuarezJCTaylorHF. Field Test of a Distributed Fiber-Optic Intrusion Sensor System for Long Perimeters. Appl Opt (2007) 46(11):1968–71. 10.1364/ao.46.001968
11.
SchawlowALTownesCH. Infrared and Optical Masers. Phys Rev (1958) 112(6):1940–9. 10.1103/physrev.112.1940
12.
RenkKF. Basics of Laser Physics. Dordrecht London New York: Springer Heidelberg (2012).
13.
SiegmanAE. Lasers. Sausalito,CA,United States: University Science Books (1986).
14.
ScullyMOLambWEJr. Quantum Theory of an Optical Maser. 1. General Theory. Phys Rev (1967) 159(2):208–26. 10.1103/physrev.159.208
15.
LiCWangTZhangHXieJLiuLGuoJ. Effect of Laser Linewidth on the Performance of Heterodyne Detection. Acta Physica Sinica (2016) 65(8):084206. 10.7498/aps.65.084206
16.
ShiLZhuTHeQHuangS. Effect of Laser Linewidth on Phase-OTDR Based Distributed Vibration Sensing Regime. Proc SPIE (2014) 9157:91576H. 10.1117/12.2059448
17.
SavorySHadjifotiouA. Laser Linewidth Requirements for Optical DQPSK Systems. IEEE Photon Technology Lett (2004) 16(3):930–2. 10.1109/lpt.2004.823720
18.
HonjoTInoueTInoueK. Influence of Light Source Linewidth in Differential-Phase-Shift Quantum Key Distribution Systems. Opt Commun (2011) 284(24):5856–9. 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.08.056
19.
BaiZWilliamsRJKitzlerOet alDiamond Brillouin Laser in the Visible. APL Photon (2020) 5(3):031301. 10.1063/1.5134907
20.
O’ReillyJJLanePMHeidemannRHofstetterR. Optical Generation of Very Narrow Linewidth Millimetre Wave Signals. Electronics Lett (1992) 28(25):2309–11. 10.1049/el:19921486
21.
Al-TaiyHWenzelNPreußlerSKlingerJSchneiderT. Ultra-narrow Linewidth, Stable and Tunable Laser Source for Optical Communication Systems and Spectroscopy. Opt Lett (2014) 39(20):5826–9. 10.1364/ol.39.005826
22.
HirataSAkatsukaTOhtakeYMorinagaA. Sub-hertz-linewidth Diode Laser Stabilized to an Ultralow-Drift High-Finesse Optical Cavity. Appl Phys Express (2014) 7(2):022705. 10.7567/apex.7.022705
23.
DreverRWPHallJLKowalskiFVHoughJFordGMMunleyAJet alLaser Phase and Frequency Stabilization Using an Optical Resonator. Appl Phys B Photophysics Laser Chem (1983) 31(2):97–105. 10.1007/bf00702605
24.
ArgenceBChanteauBLopezONicolodiDAbgrallMChristianCet alQuantum cascade Laser Frequency Stabilization at the Sub-hz Level. Nat Photon (2015) 9(7):456–60. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.93
25.
ShaykinAABurdonovKFKhazanovEA. A Novel Technique for Longitudinal Mode Selection in Q-Switched Lasers. Laser Phys Lett (2015) 12(12):125001. 10.1088/1612-2011/12/12/125001
26.
FangZCaiHChenGQUR. Fundamentals of Semiconductor Lasers. Single Frequency Semiconductor Lasers (2017) 9(39). 10.1007/978-981-10-5257-6_2
27.
The Fact Factor. Global Threat Report (2021). Available at: https://thefactfactor.com/facts/pure_science/physics/formation-of-beats/6682/ (Accessed August 26, 2021).
28.
YoungBCCruzFCItanoWM. Visible Lasers with Subhertz Linewidths. Phys Rev Lett (1999) 82(19):3799–802. 10.1103/physrevlett.82.3799
29.
KesslerTHagemannCGrebingCLegeroTSterrURiehleFet alA Sub-40-mHz-linewidth Laser Based on a Silicon Single-crystal Optical Cavity. Nat Photon (2012) 6(10):687–92. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.217
30.
LeeHSuhMGChenTLiJDiddamsSAVahalaKJ. Spiral Resonators for On-Chip Laser Frequency Stabilization. Nat Commun (2013) 4(1):2468. 10.1038/ncomms3468
31.
LiangWIlchenkoVSEliyahuDSavchenkovAAMatskoABSeidelDMalekiL. Ultralow Noise Miniature External Cavity Semiconductor Laser. Nat Commun (2015) 6(1):7371. 10.1038/ncomms8371
32.
PavlovNGKoptyaevSLihachevGVVoloshinASGorodnitskiyASRyabkoMVet alNarrow-linewidth Lasing and Soliton Kerr Microcombs with Ordinary Laser Diodes. Nat Photon (2018) 12(11):694–8. 10.1038/s41566-018-0277-2
33.
ChenMMengZWangJChenW. Ultra-narrow Linewidth Measurement Based on Voigt Profile Fitting. Opt Express (2015) 23(5):6803–8. 10.1364/oe.23.006803
34.
YuJParkYOhKKwonI. Brillouin Frequency Shifts in Silica Optical Fiber with the Double Cladding Structure. Opt Express (2002) 10(19):996–1002. 10.1364/oe.10.000996
35.
KuengAThevenazLRobertPA. Laser Linewidth Determination in the Sub-megahertz Range Using a Brillouin Fibre Laser. Proc Eur Conf Opt Commun (1996) 2:305–8. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/715751
36.
SmithSPZarinetchiFEzekielS. Narrow-linewidth Stimulated Brillouin Fiber Laser and Applications. Opt Lett (1991) 16(6):393–5. 10.1364/ol.16.000393
37.
BoschungJRobertPAThévenazL. High-accuracy Measurement of the Linewidth of a Brillouin Fibre Ring Laser. Electronics Lett (1994) 30(18):1488–9. 10.1049/el:19941053
38.
DongYLuZLuYHeW. A New Method of Measuring Ultra-narrow Laser Line-Width. J Harbin Inst Technology (2005) 37(5):670–3. https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-HEBX200505028.htm
39.
MachL. Ueber einen interferenzrefraktor. Z für Instrumentenkunde. (1982) 12(3):89–93. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach-Zehnder-Interferometer
40.
HockerGB. Fiber-optic Sensing of Pressure and Temperature. Appl Opt (1979) 18(9):1445–8. 10.1364/ao.18.001445
41.
ConfortiERodigheriMSutiliTGaldieri FlavioJ. Acoustical and 1∕f Noises in Narrow Linewidth Lasers. Opt Commun (2020) 476:126286. 10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126286
42.
RyuSYamamotoS. Measurement of Direct Frequency Modulation Characteristics of DFB-LD by Delayed Self-Homodyne Technique. Electronics Lett (1986) 22(20):1052–4. 10.1049/el:19860721
43.
NazarathyMSorinWVBaneyDMNewtonSA. Spectral Analysis of Optical Mixing Measurements. J Lightwave Technology (1989) 7(7):1083–96. 10.1109/50.29635
44.
LudvigsenHTossavainenMKaivolaM. Laser Linewidth Measurements Using Self-Homodyne Detection with Short Delay. Opt Commun (1998) 155(1–3):180–6. 10.1016/s0030-4018(98)00355-1
45.
GundavarapuSBrodnikGMPuckettMHuffmanTBoseDBehuninRet alSub-hertz Fundamental Linewidth Photonic Integrated Brillouin Laser. Nat Photon (2019) 13(1):60–7. 10.1038/s41566-018-0313-2
46.
ChauhanNIsichenkoALiuKWangJZhaoQBehuninROet alVisible Light Photonic Integrated Brillouin Laser. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):4685. 10.1038/s41467-021-24926-8
47.
PengY. A Novel Scheme for Hundred-Hertz Linewidth Measurements with the Self-Heterodyne Method. Chin Phys Lett (2013) 30(8):084208. 10.1088/0256-307x/30/8/084208
48.
MercerLB. 1/f Frequency Noise Effects on Self-Heterodyne Linewidth Measurements. J Lightwave Technology (1991) 9(4):485–93. 10.1109/50.76663
49.
OkoshiTKikuchiKNakayamaA. Novel Method for High Resolution Measurement of Laser Output Spectrum. Electronics Lett (1980) 16(16):630–1. 10.1049/el:19800437
50.
RichterLMandelbergHKrugerMMcGrathP. Linewidth Determination from Self-Heterodyne Measurements with Subcoherence Delay Times. IEEE J Quan Electronics (1986) 22(11):2070–4. 10.1109/jqe.1986.1072909
51.
SaitoSYamamotoY. Direct Observation of Lorentzian Lineshape of Semiconductor Laser and Linewidth Reduction with External Grating Feedback. Electronics Lett (1981) 17(9):325. 10.1049/el:19810229
52.
AbrarovSMQuineBMJagpalRK. A Simple Interpolating Algorithm for the Rapid and Accurate Calculation of the Voigt Function. J Quantitative Spectrosc Radiative Transfer (2009) 110(6–7):376–83. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.01.003
53.
BruceSDHiginbothamJMarshallIBeswickPH. An Analytical Derivation of a Popular Approximation of the Voigt Function for Quantification of NMR Spectra. J Magn Reson (2000) 142(1):57–63. 10.1006/jmre.1999.1911
54.
HuangSZhuTCaoZLiuMDengMLiuJet alLaser Linewidth Measurement Based on Amplitude Difference Comparison of Coherent Envelope. IEEE Photon Technology Lett (2016) 28(7):759–62. 10.1109/lpt.2015.2513098
55.
JiaYOuPYangYChunxiZ. Short Fibre Delayed Self-Heterodyne Interferometer for Ultranarrow Laser Linewidth Measurement. J Beijing Univ Aeronautics Astronautics (2008) 34(05):568. https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-BJHK200805021.htm
56.
WeiZP. Measurement of the Narrow Linewidth Laser Spectrum Based on the Delayed Self-Heterodyne. Opt Optoelectronic Technology (2015) 13(3):38–40. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/87090x/201503/71887168504849534851484857.html
57.
HuangSZhuTLiuMHuangW. Precise Measurement of Ultra-narrow Laser Linewidths Using the strong Coherent Envelope. Scientific Rep (2017) 7(1):41988. 10.1038/srep41988
58.
BaiQYanMXueBGaoYWangDWangYet alThe Influence of Laser Linewidth on the Brillouin Shift Frequency Accuracy of BOTDR. Appl Sci (2018) 9(1):58. 10.3390/app9010058
59.
HeYHuSLiangSYiyueL. High-precision Narrow Laser Linewidth Measurement Based on Coherent Envelope Demodulation. Opt Fiber Technology (2019) 50:200–5. 10.1016/j.yofte.2019.03.024
60.
WangZKeCZhongYXingCWangHYangKet alUltra-narrow-linewidth Measurement Utilizing Dual-Parameter Acquisition through a Partially Coherent Light Interference. Opt Express (2020) 28(6):8484–93. 10.1364/oe.387398
61.
XueMZhaoJ. Laser Linewidth Measurement Based on Long and Short Delay Fiber Combination. Opt Express (2021) 29(17):27118–26. 10.1364/oe.428787
62.
GaoJJiaoDDengXLiuJZhangLZangQet alA Polarization-Insensitive Recirculating Delayed Self-Heterodyne Method for Sub-kilohertz Laser Linewidth Measurement. Photonics (2021) 8(5):137. 10.3390/photonics8050137
63.
DawsonJWParkNVahalaKJ. An Improved Delayed Self-Heterodyne Interferometer for Linewidth Measurements. IEEE Photon Technology Lett (1992) 4(9):1063–6. 10.1109/68.157150
64.
HanMWangA. Analysis of a Loss-Compensated Recirculating Delayed Self-Heterodyne Interferometer for Laser Linewidth Measurement. Appl Phys B (2005) 81(1):53–8. 10.1007/s00340-005-1871-9
65.
ChenXHanMZhuYDongBWangA. Implementation of a Loss-Compensated Recirculating Delayed Self-Heterodyne Interferometer for Ultranarrow Laser Linewidth Measurement. Appl Opt (2006) 45(29):7712–7. 10.1364/ao.45.007712
66.
TsuchidaH. Simple Technique for Improving the Resolution of the Delayed Self-Heterodyne Method. Opt Lett (1990) 15(11):640. 10.1364/ol.15.000640
67.
Di DomenicoGDSchiltSThomannP. Simple Approach to the Relation between Laser Frequency Noise and Laser Line Shape. Appl Opt (2010) 49(25):4801–7. 10.1364/ao.49.004801
68.
ZhouQQinJXieWLiuZTongYDongYet alPower-area Method to Precisely Estimate Laser Linewidth from its Frequency-Noise Spectrum. Appl Opt (2015) 54(28):8282–9. 10.1364/ao.54.008282
69.
XuDLuBYangFDijunCHaiwenCQuR. Narrow Linewidth Single-Frequency Laser Noise Measurement Based on a 3×3 Fiber Coupler. Chin J Lasers (2016) 43(1):0102004. 10.3788/cjl201643.0102004
70.
TranMAHuangDBowersJE. Tutorial on Narrow Linewidth Tunable Semiconductor Lasers Using Si/III-V Heterogeneous Integration. APL Photon (2019) 4(11):111101. 10.1063/1.5124254
71.
PollnauMEichhornM. Spectral Coherence, Part I: Passive-Resonator Linewidth, Fundamental Laser Linewidth, and Schawlow-Townes Approximation. Prog Quan Electronics (2020) 72:100255. 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2020.100255
72.
PollnauM. Phase Aspect in Photon Emission and Absorption. Optica (2018) 5(4):465–74. 10.1364/optica.5.000465
Summary
Keywords
narrow-linewidth, laser, measurement, high coherence, beat note
Citation
Bai Z, Zhao Z, Qi Y, Ding J, Li S, Yan X, Wang Y and Lu Z (2021) Narrow-Linewidth Laser Linewidth Measurement Technology. Front. Phys. 9:768165. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.768165
Received
31 August 2021
Accepted
01 November 2021
Published
24 November 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Bao-Sen Shi, University of Science and Technology of China, China
Reviewed by
Ping Su, Tsinghua University, China
Tao Peng, Texas A&M University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Bai, Zhao, Qi, Ding, Li, Yan, Wang and Lu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhenxu Bai, baizhenxu@hotmail.com
This article was submitted to Optics and Photonics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.