Abstract
In this article, we discuss some aspects of the quenching of the single-particle strength with emphasis on the isospin dependence of long- and short-range correlations. A phenomenological analysis that connects recent Jefferson Laboratory studies with data on spectroscopic factors, is contrasted with the results of the Dispersive Optical Model approach. We consider some consequences of the model on the nature of the dressed nucleons in the nuclear medium, their effective masses, as well as other aspects of nuclear structure such as charge radii, effective charges, and spin-spin correlations. Qualitative estimates indicate that short-range correlations must play a significant role on those aspects. Despite the fact that our conclusions are perhaps speculative at this stage, we trust that the results will stimulate further experimental and theoretical work, specifically on exotic nuclei far from stability.
1 Introduction
The year 2024 marks the anniversary of the publication of the seminal papers by Maria Goeppert-Mayer and Hans Jensen on the nuclear shell model [1, 2]; their work together with the collective model [3] established the pillars of our understanding of nuclear structure. Despite the fact that atomic nuclei consist of strongly interacting nucleons forming a dense quantum system, the notion of independent particle motion in a mean-field has been highly successful and has provided the framework to explain many nuclear properties, notably the so-called magic numbers. However, as Goeppert-Mayer remarked in her Nobel Lecture [4] “The assumption of the occurrence of clear individual orbits of neutrons and protons in the nucleus is open to grave doubts”, and went on to say “It still remains surprising that the model works so well”1.
An appealing argument has been given by Mottelson [6] based on the quantality parameter:with the inter-constituents distance, which measures the ratio of the zero point motion kinetic energy to the strength of the interaction . With the typical values shown in Figure 1, the quantality parameter for nuclei is of order , similar to those in 3He and 4He which are liquids at zero temperature (for comparison, values for solids are ). Thus, nuclei should behave like a quantum Fermi liquid [7], with quasi-particles taking the role of the particles in the Independent Particle Model (IPM).
FIGURE 1
Considering the nucleus in the simplest approximation of a non-interacting Fermi gas, the occupation probability distribution of orbitals with momentum is a step function, i.e., for and for , with the Fermi momentum. In a Fermi liquid, where correlations between nucleons are considered, the mean-field approximation gets modified, diluting the pure independent-particle picture due to excitations across , as illustrated in Figure 2. To some extent, the effects of the correlations could be embedded in the concept of a quasi-particle (qp), with energy:from which it follows that the acquires an effective mass:Due to the Pauli principle the phase-space for scattering, which goes as , is drastically reduced giving the quasi-particle a lifetime much longer than the characteristic orbit transit time , with a typical harmonic oscillator frequency. Thus, the conclusion that emerges is that the independent particles of the shell or collective models should be interpreted as “dressed” nucleons.
FIGURE 2
Crucial evidence for the departure from the IPM comes from high-energy electron scattering showing that the nuclear ground-state wavefunction must have a marked admixture of high-momentum components. The high-momentum tail, typically parameterized as with [9, 10], can be understood as the result of nucleon-nucleon short-range correlations (SRC) introduced by the strong nuclear force, and corresponds to single-particle excitations, MeV. In reference to the geometrical picture depicted in Figure 1, a nucleon finds itself within a relative distance of 1 fm about of the time. Furthermore, the strong attraction due to the tensor force in the spin - 3S1 channel [11] suggests that at short distances, nucleon pairs are correlated in the same way as they are in the deuteron or in free scattering processes [10].
In the following, we discuss the implications of the concepts above to some aspects of the structure of atomic nuclei with an emphasis on the evolution with isospin (neutron-proton asymmetry).
2 Quenching of spectroscopic factors
Direct reactions continue to play a major role in our understanding of the nuclear elementary modes of excitation, particularly in the characterization of the single-particle degrees of freedom and their correlations. A reaction is called direct if it proceeds directly from the initial to the final state without the formation of an intermediate compound state and, to a good approximation, the cross section can be factorized into a nuclear-structure term and a reaction term corresponding to that of a single-particle state. Thus, these reactions have been used to test models of nuclear structure by comparing spectroscopic overlaps between initial and final nuclear states. The spectroscopic overlaps are represented by spectroscopic factors, derived from the experimentally measured cross section divided by the calculated one for a single-particle state with the same energy and quantum numbers (effectively reduced cross sections).
In more detail we have for the case of a particle-adding reaction:whereis the spectroscopic factor giving the structure information and a single-particle reaction cross section, with similar expressions for particle-removing reactions. Depending on the type of reaction being studied, the single-particle cross section can be calculated in different approximations, for example: distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA), distorted-wave impulse approximation (DWIA), Eikonal approximation, etc. (see Refs. [12–17] and references therein).
Using the commutation rules and tensor properties of the creation and annihilation operators and one can obtain the Macfarlane-French sum rules [18]:An important consequence of the equations above is that in cases where both addition and removal reactions could me measured, such as and , there is a total sum rule that measures the orbit degeneracy, independent of the details of how the particles and vacancies are distributed:In addition to the high-momentum tails observed in high-energy electron scattering, the depletion of the single-proton strength as observed in reactions in the quasi-free scattering regime [19, 20] is perhaps one of the best indicators for the departure from a mean-field approximation to the structure of nuclei. Experimental data for 16 stable targets point to a quenching of proton spectroscopic factors of 0.55 (0.07 rms) with respect to the IPM expectations2 expressed as:
Recently, there has been some debate regarding the meaning of spectroscopic factors, as these are not true observables [23, 24]. To address this question, Schiffer and collaborators [25] studied neutron-adding, neutron-removal, and proton-adding transfer reactions on the stable even Ni isotopes, with particular attention to the cross-section determinations. Spectroscopic factors derived from a consistent analysis of the data, in terms of the DWBA, were used to extract valence-orbit occupancies (vacancies) following from the sum rules discussed above. The deduced occupancies are consistent at the level of 5% indicating that, in the absence of a full ab initio calculation of structure and reaction cross sections, spectroscopic factors provide an empirically meaningful quantity to compare with theory. The use of shape deformation parameters, , in the interpretation of collective nuclei comes to mind as a similar case.
Following on that work, the Argonne group carried out an extensive survey and self-consistent analysis of single-nucleon transfer reactions [26]. Summed spectroscopic strengths (Equation 1) were used to determine the factor (Equation 2) by which the observed cross sections, corrected for the reaction mechanism, differ from expectations. Across the 124 cases they analyzed, including various proton- and neutron-transfer reactions and with angular momentum transfer = 0–7, spectroscopic factors are quenched with respect to the values expected from mean-field theory by a constant factor of 0.55, with an rms spread of 0.10, and consistent with that determined in . The factor appears to be independent of whether the reaction is nucleon adding or removing, whether a neutron or proton is transferred, the mass of the nucleus, the reaction type, and angular-momentum transfer. This provides compelling evidence for a uniform quenching of single-particle motion in the nuclear medium.
The topic continues to be of much interest in the field [17] and open questions remain in regard to the evolution of correlations in nuclei with large neutron-proton asymmetry which are becoming accessible by radioactive beam studies of transfer, knockout, and quasi-free scattering (QFS) reactions. In these exotic systems, the effects of weak binding and coupling to the continuum might also play an important role.
An intriguing (rather controversial) result receiving attention is the (apparent) quenching observed in one-proton (and one-neutron) removal reactions carried out at intermediate energies around 100 MeV/nucleon. The study of Refs. [27, 28] showed an unexpected dependence of the quenching, as a function of the difference in proton and neutron separation energies, , of the initial system, at odds with the results obtained in transfer and QFS reactions [17]. Whether the origin of this dependence is due to the effect of correlations or deficiencies in the reaction model is still a matter of debate.
2.1 Long-range and short-range correlations
The in-medium effects are captured by the concept of a quasi-particle. At any given moment, only of the states below the Fermi momentum are occupied, with of the nucleons participating in more complex configurations [19, 20, 26, 29–34].
The correlations that modify the mean-field approximation picture are often distinguished into long-range correlations (LRC) and short-range correlations (SRC), referring to their spatial separation and the part of the NN potential they are most sensitive to [30, 35, 36]. Therefore, both LRC and SRC deplete the occupancy of single-particle states, with LRC primarily mixing states near the nuclear Fermi momentum and SRC populating states well above it. It is important to note that within the context of this work, LRC are defined as (surface) pairing (PC) and particle-vibration coupling (PVC). While generally in low-energy nuclear structure one refers to pairing correlations as the short-range part of the force, as compared to the quadrupole force which is of longer range, here pairing is not considered part of the SRC associated with high-momentum components.
In Figure 2, we summarize the situation with the cases of 40,48Ca that have been extensively studied. On one hand the sharp cutoff at the Fermi surface, expected for a non-interacting system, is seen to be broaden by the effect of the LRC admixing n-particle–n-hole configurations, typically of order the pairing gap, , around . On the other hand, SRCs (tensor force) are thought to induce the high-momentum tail via the formation of correlated high-momentum isospin , spin neutron-proton pairs, a quasi-deuteron. In fact, results from Jefferson Lab (JLab) presented in Ref. [37] indicate that of the nucleons with high-momentum are correlated in those configurations.
2.2 Isospin dependence
The isospin dependence of LRC and SRC, and their competition in very asymmetric nuclei is a question that requires further studies. By explicitly incorporating the observed [38] increase of the high-momentum component of the protons in neutron-rich nuclei, we recently proposed a phenomenological approach to examine the role of both SRC and LRC in the quenching of the single-particle strength (SP) in atomic nuclei, specifically their evolution in asymmetric nuclei and neutron matter [39]. In our approach, we start by proposing that the wave-function of the quasi-particle, representing a dressed nucleon in the nuclear medium can be written in the linear form:This conjecture and the lack of interference terms stem from the underlying assumption that the SP, LRC, and SRC states are all orthogonal to each other. This is supported by the fact that SRC induce mixing to states of very high momentum and energy in the nuclear spectral function and there should be a small overlap with the SP and LRC components [29, 40, 41]. In near doubly magic nuclei, for which both pairing and deformation manifest themselves as vibrations, the individual terms in Equation 3 can be justified in first order perturbation as one-particle–one-hole (1p1h) (PVC) and two-particle–two-hole (2p2h) (PC) excitations. From the general arguments given in Ref. [39], we adopted the following expressions for the isospin dependence of PVC and PC:The findings in Ref. [38] from JLab exclusive measurements of the correlated proton and neutron momenta, readily suggest the phenomenological expressions,with the slope parameters and giving the isospin-dependence of the SRC contribution. Majority and minority define the protons, neutrons in asymmetric systems; protons are the majority at and neutrons are the majority at . The results of our fit of the experimental data on doubly magic nuclei give: , 3, and . The different contributions are shown in Figure 3. The quenched single-particle strength, (Equation 2), is expressed in terms of the independent components asWe end this section by comparing our predictions with the results of Refs. [27, 28]. For this purpose, we use the equations given in Ref. [42] to convert and into . The two trends are shown as shaded areas in Figure 4. As seen, our results give a less pronounced dependence on (in excellent agreement with, e.g., [43–46]); although not conclusive, it may point to a deficiency in the nucleon knockout reaction model rather than structure effects.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
2.3 Comparison with the dispersive optical model
Dickhoff and collaborators have led extensive studies on the application of the dispersive-optical-model (DOM) to describe simultaneously a wealth of structure and reaction experimental data (see Ref. [47] for a review). Of particular relevance here is their study of the neutron-proton asymmetry dependence of correlations in nuclei [48]. In that work, elastic-scattering measurements, total and reaction cross-section measurements, data, and single-particle energies for magic and doubly-magic nuclei were analyzed within the DOM framework to generate optical-model potentials that can be related to spectroscopic factors and occupation probabilities. Their results show that, for stable nuclei with , the imaginary surface potential for protons exhibits a strong dependence on the neutron-proton asymmetry, leading to a modest dependence of the spectroscopic factors on asymmetry. The appealing aspect of the DOM approach is that both LRC and SRC are described by surface and volume imaginary potentials, respectively. It is of interest to compare the predicted DOM results for the proton spectroscopic factors in stable Sn isotopes with our calculations. This is done in Figure 5, showing remarkable agreement between the two predictions, which adds additional support to our phenomenological model. Furthermore, in the DOM analysis of all considered nuclei, the neutron imaginary potential displays very little dependence on the neutron-proton asymmetry, also in line with our findings for nuclei (Figure 3).
FIGURE 5
3 The nature of the dressed nucleons
As discussed earlier, the arguments put forward by Brueckner [10] suggest that in the presence of SRC components in the interaction, a “bare” nucleon becomes “dressed” in a virtual quasi-deuteron cloud about of the time, as measured by the coefficient of Equations 4, 5. The implications of SRC and the quasi-deuteron concept have been discussed and elaborated in many works, e.g. [49–54], which we are not in a position to discuss here. Rather, we focus on the qualitative (phenomenological) approach to discuss the potential impact of the qp nature, induced by SRC, in low-energy observables for which, a priori, the properties of the finite system are quite essential.
In terms of the underlying independent single-particle shell structure, we could qualitatively interpret the effect as follows: a high-momentum proton (neutron) scatters from a neutron (proton) in a orbit forming a quasi-deuteron in a higher level while leaving behind a hole below the Fermi level. In more detail,If we further assume that = , then we can rewrite the equation above as:with , and where the last term in parenthesis can be interpreted as an effective . The high-momentum components of the nucleon wavefunction requiring single-particle excitations of the order of MeV will correspond to a quasi-deuteron generated from harmonic oscillator orbitals associated with changes in the principal oscillator quantum number, . In reference to Figure 1, a typical shell model mixing matrix element in the triplet-even channel, using harmonic oscillator wavefunctions, can be estimated [55]:giving a mixing amplitude in Equation 7 ofAssuming a single- valence shell, we approximate . The number of orbits available to scatter the is of order:leading finally to , in line with the SRC strength amplitude empirically determined from Equations 4, 5, i.e., [39].
4 Effective mass
The concept of nucleon effective mass, , was originally developed by Brueckner [9] to describe the motion of nucleons in a momentum-dependent potential with the motion of a quasi-nucleon of mass in a momentum-independent potential. The momentum dependence of the neutron and proton mean field is reflected in the nucleon effective masses, with varying theoretical predictions depending on the approach and interaction used, see, e.g., [56]. What is particularly important is the so-called effective mass splitting, i.e., , in asymmetric nuclear matter. This impacts the equilibrium neutron/proton ratio in primordial nucleosynthesis, properties of neutron stars and mirror nuclei, and the location of the neutron and proton drip-lines, to name a few4. Although the nature of the splitting has been largely resolved in neutron-rich asymmetric nuclear matter, with the neutron effective mass being larger than that of the proton, the magnitude of the splitting remains an open question. The latter is determined by the momentum dependence of the isovector part of the single-nucleon potential, while the effective mass of symmetric nuclear matter also plays a role. Thus, probing the nucleon effective mass from a different perspective can give us insights into the momentum dependence of the nuclear mean field and can address the question of the proton-neutron effective mass splitting.
Bertsch and Kuo [29] have connected the effective mass to the depletion of the single-particle strength. By evaluating the contributions to the single-particle energy in second-order perturbation theory, they obtained the relation:approximately equal to the depletion of the single-particle strength of the state. By relating to Equations 2, 6, we can rewrite the expression above in terms of :from which we predict the neutron and proton effective masses as a function of , shown in Figure 6.
FIGURE 6
Our results are compared with the values obtained in Ref. [58] from a single-nucleon potential derived within the Hartree-Fock approach using a modified Gogny effective interaction (MDI) [59]. We also compare with the nuclear matter predictions on the effective mass (at nuclear saturation density) in a Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (BHF) nuclear many-body approach [60]. In this model, which gives satisfactory nuclear matter bulk properties, the nucleon force includes a two-body component from the Argonne V18 potential and a three-body term constructed from the meson-exchange-current approach. As seen, both predictions give different nucleon effective masses, reflecting their dependence on the interaction used. It is interesting to note that in order to reproduce the nuclear matter predictions, we would need a SRC component of in the reduction of the single-particle strength, in contrast to the established value of .
As discussed in [39] we can also speculate about the nature of a quasi-proton (nuclear polaron [61]) in neutron matter (nM). For infinite matter at saturation density we can neglect surface and pairing coupling terms, both expected to be small, and take the limit of and . We predict a proton quenching factor of and an effective mass, , in good agreement with the nuclear matter calculations of Refs. [57, 58].
In the following, we turn our attention to finite nuclei and the implications of the phenomenological model to aspects of nuclear structure such as charge radii, effective charges, and spin-spin correlations.
5 Charge radii
The nuclear charge radius is a measure of the distribution of protons in the nucleus and it constitutes one of the fundamental nuclear properties that, together with masses, can challenge nuclear models. A laser spectroscopy measurement [62] reported anomalously large charge radii in 50,52Ca relative to 48Ca, beyond what state-of-the-art ab initio calculations could reproduce. This result could indicate the occurrence of proton excitations (core-breaking) across the gap in the neutron-rich Ca isotopes, challenging the doubly-magic nature of 52Ca with implications beyond the scope of this article. A recent study employing quasi-free one-neutron knockout from 52Ca [63] showed that the rms radius of the neutron orbital is significantly larger than that of the orbital, suggesting that the large charge radii in the Ca isotopes could be attributed to the extended spatial distribution of neutron orbitals. Another interpretation, however, was discussed by Miller and collaborators [64], who suggested that the increase in the charge radii could be attributed to SRC with the deficiency of ab initio calculations reproducing this anomaly coming from the use of soft potentials that do not capture the effects of SRC in charge radii; indeed, in neutron-rich nuclei we anticipate protons spending more time in the high-momentum part of the nucleon momentum density distribution, impacting the distribution of charges and hence the charge radii.
A simple estimate of the effect due to SRC follows from the consideration that protons in the quasi-deuteron configuration are associated with orbits with higher principal oscillator numbers that induce a change in the proton radiuswhere and with an isospin dependence that resembles the experimental trend, as shown in Figure 7. Indeed, SRCs can induce an increase in the nuclear mean-square charge radius, , beyond what is expected following the size of the nucleus . This result demonstrates the impact that SRCs can have on properties like charge radii and highlights the importance of including them in the theoretical description of atomic nuclei.
FIGURE 7
6 Effective charges
It is interesting to comment that the same mechanism will contribute to the nucleons’ effective charges. In the shell model, core polarization effects result in and , with a typical value of [65]. Specific values for different mass regions are usually fitted to reproduce quadrupole electromagnetic properties. A contribution from SRC can be estimated along the same line as above:giving a value of the order of 0.1 near 40Ca. This contribution should be present even in the absence of any core-polarization effect.
7 Ground-state spin-spin correlations
This section explores the possible effect of SRCs to the ground-state spin-spin correlations in order to provide a plausible explanation for the reported discrepancy between experimental and shel-model results.
Within the context of understanding the role played by isoscalar pairing in the ground states of nuclei [66], the Osaka group has led a series of studies [67, 68] to probe neutron–proton spin–spin correlations in the ground states of nuclei in the shell. The relevant observable is the scalar product between the total spins of the neutrons and protons, , which can be measured by spin excitations produced by inelastic hadronic scattering at medium energies.
The operator consists of spin and orbital angular-momentum terms which can be of isoscalar (IS: ) and isovector (IV: ) nature. The IS and IV spin- reduced nuclear matrix elements (ME) for transitions from the ground state of an even-even nucleus to an excited state are defined byThese can be determined by measuring the differential cross-section at 0°, which is proportional to the squared matrix elements above. The conversion from cross sections to absolute ME is done through a unit cross section and a kinematic factor, similar to the case of Gamow-Teller (GT) transitions [69]. Once the ME are determined,where the sums are typically up to MeV. Since the values in the two-particle system are distinctively different: will also depend strongly on the type of pairs being scattered across the Fermi surface.
In the experiments carried out at the RCNP facility in Osaka, high energy-resolution proton inelastic scattering at MeV was studied in 24Mg, 28Si, 32S and 36Ar [67]. The results in Figure 8, show positive values of for the shell suggesting a predominance of quasi-deuterons, at variance with USD shell-model calculations that are unable to reproduce the experimental results.
FIGURE 8
In Ref. [70] a formalism was developed to calculate the matrix elements of the operator in a variety of coupling schemes and apply it to the solution of a schematic model consisting of nucleons in a single- shell. The study showed that for all possible parameter values in the model Hamiltonian the expectation value is found to be 0 in the ground state of all even–even nuclei, and the spin–orbit term in the nuclear mean field leads to more negative values.
What could be the reason for the positive values? Is it possible that we are observing the effects of the deuteron cloud dressing the nucleons related to the SRC quenching of spectroscopic factors? In fact, we can estimate a correction to the USD results based on the value of discussed earlier. Taking either 16O or 40Ca as the closest spin saturated cores for the -shell, the number of valence quasi-deuterons present in the paired ground states could contribute up to a positive value of to the USD values,bringing the estimates closer to the experimental measurements as shown in Figure 8. It seems clear that further theoretical and experimental work is required to fully answer remaining questions as to the microscopic origin of the spin–spin correlations. In particular, a compelling experimental direction to follow would be to study their isospin dependence. An approved experiment at iThemba [71] will extend the studies of Ref. [67] measuring the spin-spin correlations in the ground states of 46,48Ti (see right panel in Figure 8), for which the shell model using the MBZ interaction [72] predicts negative values. For targets, a combination of and scattering is required to disentangle the IS and IV components of the operator.
8 Conclusion
The quenching of single-particle strength in atomic nuclei continues to be an active area of research in nuclear physics. Modern advances in direct reactions, particularly suited to probe nucleon occupancies, are providing new insights for a quantitative understanding of this phenomenon, intimately related to the fundamental nature of nucleons in the nuclear medium. In an attempt to connect recent studies on SRC from Jefferson Laboratory with data on spectroscopic factors, we have proposed a phenomenological model discussed in Sec. 2 that includes the combined effects of SRC and LRC (PVC and PC). Our results are in agreement with those of the DOM.
We have explored potential implications of our phenomenological analysis on some other aspects of nuclear structure, with special emphasis on the evolution with isospin. In particular, we discussed the subjects of effective masses, charge radii and effective charges, and spin-spin correlations. We showed that our estimates for the asymmetry dependence of effective masses due to SRC are consistent with microscopic calculations. More qualitative estimates of charge radii and effective charges, and spin-spin correlations reveal observable effects due to SRC on these properties.
While perhaps rather speculative at this stage, our conclusions suggest the significant role that SRC play in the nature of dressed nucleons in the nuclear medium, and we trust that our results will stimulate additional work. On the experimental side, existing accelerator facilities and new detector systems with increased sensitivity and resolving power are positioning us to access exotic beams to study exclusive direct reactions, in reverse kinematics, to explore the isospin degree of freedom and shed further light on the topic. On the theory side, new ab initio developments and the large increase in computer power becoming available are shaping a path to a predictive model of nuclei and their reactions. Achieving that ultimate goal will require a strong synergy between experiment and theory to design the best possible experiments that will inform of important improvements in the model. In turn, new theoretical insights will lead to new experimental programs that will be, again, contrasted with theory. One cannot but look forward to these exciting developments.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: None. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to Augusto O. Macchiavelli macchiavelao@ornl.gov.
Author contributions
AOM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SP: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. MP: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Royal Society, the United Kingdom STFC under Grant numbers ST/P003885/1, ST/M006433/1, ST/V001035/1, ST/L005727/1, the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725.
Acknowledgments
AOM would like to thank the Royal Society for financial support and the Department of Physics at the University of York for their kind hospitality during the course of this work and the many “cortados” that were crucial for the completion of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1.^The validity of the shell model is discussed in detail in Ref. [5].
2.^At this point it is important to note that the quenching extracted from measurements may depend on the momentum transfer, [21, 22]. Although the dependence of the quenching needs to be better understood, here we analyze the (well established) low- data, where the scale resolution should be sensitive to probe the quenching due to both SRC and LRC [21].
3.^The value of has been estimated based on lowest order pairing vibrations that introduce 2p2h admixtures in the unperturbed (0p0h) ground-state configurations and has not been fitted to experimental data, hence there is no uncertainty associated with it.
4.^For an overview on effective masses we point to the review of Bao-An Li and collaborators [57] and references therein.
References
1.
MayerMG. On closed shells in nuclei. ii. Phys Rev (1949) 75:1969–70. 10.1103/PhysRev.75.1969
2.
HaxelOJensenJHDSuessHE. On the “magic numbers” in nuclear structure. Phys Rev (1949) 75:1766. 10.1103/PhysRev.75.1766.2
3.
BohrAMottelsonBR. Nuclear structure, volumes I and II. World Scientific (2008).
4.
MayerMG. The shell model. Nobel Lecture (1963) 32–90. 10.1016/b978-0-08-009840-1.50007-4
5.
GomesLWaleckaJWeisskopfV. Properties of nuclear matter. Ann Phys (1958) 3:241–74. 10.1016/0003-4916(58)90019-8
6.
MottelsonB. Why are nuclei described by independent particle motion. Nucl Phys A (1999) 649:45. 10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00037-8
7.
De Witt HubertsP. Are nuclei strongly correlated fermi liquids? empirical evidence from (e,ep) spectral functions. Prog Part Nucl Phys (1990) 24:205–18. 10.1016/0146-6410(90)90017-X
8.
WiringaRBArriagaAPandharipandeVR. Quadratic momentum dependence in the nucleon-nucleon interaction. Phys Rev C (2003) 68:054006. 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.054006
9.
BruecknerK. Two-body forces and nuclear saturation. iii. details of the structure of the nucleus. Phys Rev (1955) 97:1353–66. 10.1103/PhysRev.97.1353
10.
BruecknerKA. Particle theories. Proc Rutherford Jubilee Int Conf Manchester (1961).
11.
SchiavillaRWiringaRBPieperSCCarlsonJ. Tensor forces and the ground-state structure of nuclei. Phys Rev Lett (2007) 98:132501. 10.1103/physrevlett.98.132501
12.
AkhiezerASitenkoA. SOVIET PHYSICS JETP (1957) 5:652.
13.
GlauberRet alLectures in theoretical physics. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers, Inc, (1959) 1. 315 p.
14.
BertulaniCA. Relativistic continuum-continuum coupling in the dissociation of halo nuclei. Phys Rev Lett (2005) 94:072701. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.072701
15.
GadeAAdrichPBazinDBowenMDBrownBACampbellCMet alReduction of spectroscopic strength: weakly-bound and strongly-bound single-particle states studied using one-nucleon knockout reactions. Phys Rev C (2008) 77:044306. 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.044306
16.
OgataKBertulaniCA. Dynamical relativistic effects in breakup processes of halo nuclei. Prog Theor Phys (2010) 123:701–18. 10.1143/PTP.123.701
17.
AumannTBarbieriCBazinDBertulaniCBonaccorsoADickhoffWet alQuenching of single-particle strength from direct reactions with stable and rare-isotope beams. Prog Part Nucl Phys (2021) 118:103847. 10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103847
18.
MacfarlaneMHFrenchJB. Stripping reactions and the structure of light and intermediate nuclei. Rev Mod Phys (1960) 32:567–691. 10.1103/RevModPhys.32.567
19.
LapikasL. Quasi-elastic electron scattering off nuclei. Nucl Phys A (1993) 553:297–308. 10.1016/0375-9474(93)90630-G
20.
KramerGBlokHLapikasL. A consistent analysis of (e,e’p) and (d,3he) experiments. Nucl Phys A (2001) 679:267–86. 10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00379-1
21.
LapikásLvan der SteenhovenGFrankfurtLStrikmanMZhalovM. Transparency of 12C for protons. Phys Rev C (2000) 61:064325. 10.1103/PhysRevC.61.064325
22.
FrankfurtLStrikmanMZhalovM. Single-particle strength restoration and nuclear transparency in high-Q2 exclusive (e,e′p) reactions. Phys Lett B (2001) 503:73–80. 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00173-3
23.
FurnstahlRHammerHW. Are occupation numbers observable?Phys Lett B (2002) 531:203–8. 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01504-0
24.
FurnstahlRJSchwenkA. How should one formulate, extract and interpret ‘non-observables’ for nuclei?J Phys G: Nucl Part Phys (2010) 37:064005. 10.1088/0954-3899/37/6/064005
25.
SchifferJPHoffmanCRKayBPClarkJADeibelCMFreemanSJet alTest of sum rules in nucleon transfer reactions. Phys Rev Lett (2012) 108:022501. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.022501
26.
KayBPSchifferJPFreemanSJ. Quenching of cross sections in nucleon transfer reactions. Phys Rev Lett (2013) 111:042502. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.042502
27.
TostevinJAGadeA. Systematics of intermediate-energy single-nucleon removal cross sections. Phys Rev C (2014) 90:057602. 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.057602
28.
TostevinJAGadeA. Updated systematics of intermediate-energy single-nucleon removal cross sections. Phys Rev C (2021) 103:054610. 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054610
29.
BertschGKuoT. Effective mass in nuclei. Nucl Phys A (1968) 112:204–8. 10.1016/0375-9474(68)90230-3
30.
DickhoffWBarbieriC. Self-consistent green’s function method for nuclei and nuclear matter. Prog Part Nucl Phys (2004) 52:377–496. 10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.038
31.
BruecknerKAEdenRJFrancisNC. High-energy reactions and the evidence for correlations in the nuclear ground-state wave function. Phys Rev (1955) 98:1445–55. 10.1103/PhysRev.98.1445
32.
FlavignyFGillibertANalpasLObertelliAKeeleyNBarbieriCet alLimited asymmetry dependence of correlations from single nucleon transfer. Phys Rev Lett (2013) 110:122503. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.122503
33.
DevinsDFrieselDJonesWAttardASvalbeIOfficerVet alThe 12c(p,2p)11b reaction at 100 mev. Aust J Phys (1979) 32:323–34. 10.1071/ph790323
34.
AtkinsonMCBlokHPLapikásLCharityRJDickhoffWH. Validity of the distorted-wave impulse-approximation description of 40Ca(e, e’p)39Kdata using only ingredients from a nonlocal dispersive optical model. Phys Rev C (2018) 98. 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044627
35.
HenOMillerGAPiasetzkyEWeinsteinLB. Nucleon-nucleon correlations, short-lived excitations, and the quarks within. Rev Mod Phys (2017) 89:045002. 10.1103/revmodphys.89.045002
36.
FrankfurtLLStrikmanMI. High-energy phenomena, short range nuclear structure and QCD. Phys Rept (1981) 76:215–347. 10.1016/0370-1573(81)90129-0
37.
SubediRShneorRMonaghanPAndersonBDAniolKAnnandJet alProbing cold dense nuclear matter. Science (2008) 320:1476–8. 10.1126/science.1156675
38.
The CLAS collaboration. Probing high-momentum protons and neutrons inneutron-rich nuclei. Nature(2018) 560:617–21. 10.1038/s41586-018-0400-z-1154-1155
39.
PaschalisSPetriMMacchiavelliAHenOPiasetzkyE. Nucleon-nucleon correlations and the single-particle strength in atomic nuclei. Phys Lett B (2020) 800:135110. 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135110
40.
Ciofi degli Atti C. In-medium short-range dynamics of nucleons: recent theoretical and experimental advances. Phys Rept (2015) 590:1–85. 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.06.002
41.
WeissRKoroverIPiasetzkyEHenOBarneaN. Energy and momentum dependence of nuclear short-range correlations - spectral function, exclusive scattering experiments and the contact formalism. Phys Lett B (2019) 791:242–8. 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.02.019
42.
VogtKHartmannTZilgesA. Simple parametrization of single- and two-nucleon separation energies in terms of the neutron to proton ratio n/z. Phys Lett B (2001) 517:255–60. 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01014-0
43.
PohlTSunYLObertelliALeeJGómez-RamosMOgataKet alMultiple mechanisms in proton-induced nucleon removal at ∼ 100 MeV/Nucleon. Phys Rev Lett (2023) 130:172501. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.172501
44.
AtarLPaschalisSBarbieriCBertulaniCADíaz FernándezPHollMet alQuasifree (p, 2p) reactions on oxygen isotopes: observation of isospin independence of the reduced single-particle strength. Phys Rev Lett (2018) 120:052501. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.052501
45.
KayBPTangTLTolstukhinIARoderickGBMitchellAJAyyadYet alQuenching of single-particle strength in a = 15 nuclei. Phys Rev Lett (2022) 129:152501. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.152501
46.
ManfrediJLeeJRogersAMTsangMBLynchWGAndersonCet alQuenching of single-particle strengths in direct reactions. Phys Rev C (2021) 104:024608. 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024608
47.
DickhoffWHCharityRJMahzoonMH. Novel applications of the dispersive optical model. J Phys G: Nucl Part Phys (2017) 44:033001. 10.1088/1361-6471/44/3/033001
48.
MuellerJMCharityRJShaneRSobotkaLGWaldeckerSJDickhoffWHet alAsymmetry dependence of nucleon correlations in spherical nuclei extracted from a dispersive-optical-model analysis. Phys Rev C (2011) 83:064605. 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.064605
49.
LevingerJ. Modified quasi-deutron model. Phys Lett B (1979) 82:181–2. 10.1016/0370-2693(79)90730-5
50.
LevingerJ. Fifty years of the quasi-deuteron model. Nucl Phys A (2002) 699:255–60. 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01501-9
51.
NeffTFeldmeierH. Tensor correlations in the unitary correlation operator method. Nucl Phys A (2003) 713:311–71. 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01307-6
52.
NeffTFeldmeierHHoriuchiW. Short-range correlations in nuclei with similarity renormalization group transformations. Phys Rev C (2015) 92:024003. 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.024003
53.
TropianoAJBognerSKFurnstahlRJHishamMA. Quasi-deuteron model at low renormalization group resolution. Phys Rev C (2022) 106:024324. 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024324
54.
BurrelloSTypelS. Embedding short-range correlations in relativistic density functionals through quasi-deuterons. The Eur Phys J A (2022) 58:120. 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00765-z
55.
EtchegoyenAEtchegoyenMVerginiE. Evaluation of Hamiltonian two-body matrix elements. Computer Phys Commun (1989) 55:227–31. 10.1016/0010-4655(89)90079-9
56.
XuJChenLWLiBAMaHR. Effects of isospin and momentum dependent interactions on thermal properties of asymmetric nuclear matter. Phys Rev C (2008) 77:014302. 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.014302
57.
LiBACaiBJChenLWXuJ. Nucleon effective masses in neutron-rich matter. Prog Part Nucl Phys (2018) 99:29–119. 10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.01.001
58.
LiBAChenLW. Nucleon-nucleon cross sections in neutron-rich matter and isospin transport in heavy-ion reactions at intermediate energies. Phys Rev C (2005) 72:064611. 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064611
59.
DasCBDas GuptaSGaleCLiBA. Momentum dependence of symmetry potential in asymmetric nuclear matter for transport model calculations. Phys Rev C (2003) 67:034611. 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.034611
60.
LiAHuJNShangXLZuoW. Nonrelativistic nucleon effective masses in nuclear matter: Brueckner-Hartree-Fock model versus relativistic Hartree-Fock model. Phys Rev C (2016) 93:015803. 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.015803
61.
KutscheraMWójcikW. Proton impurity in the neutron matter: a nuclear polaron problem. Phys Rev C (1993) 47:1077–85. 10.1103/PhysRevC.47.1077
62.
Garcia RuizRFBissellMLBlaumKEkströmAFrömmgenNHagenGet alUnexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes. Nat Phys (2016) 12:594–8. 10.1038/nphys3645
63.
EnciuMLiuHNObertelliADoornenbalPNowackiFOgataKet alExtended p3/2 neutron orbital and the n = 32 shell closure in 52Ca. Phys Rev Lett (2022) 129262501. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.262501
64.
MillerGBeckABeckSMTWeinsteinLPiasetzkyEHenO. Can long-range nuclear properties be influenced by short range interactions? a chiral dynamics estimate. Phys Lett B (2019) 793:360–4. 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.010
65.
BohrAMottelsonBR. Nuclear structure, volume II. World Scientific (2008).
66.
FrauendorfSMacchiavelliA. Overview of neutron–proton pairing. Prog Part Nucl Phys (2014) 78:24–90. 10.1016/j.ppnp.2014.07.001
67.
MatsubaraHTamiiANakadaHAdachiTCarterJDozonoMet alNonquenched isoscalar spin-m1 excitations in sd-shell nuclei. Phys Rev Lett (2015) 115102501. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.102501
68.
MatsubaraH. Isoscalar and isovector spin-M1 transitions from the even-even, N = Z nuclei across the sd-shell region. Ph.D Thesis, Department Physics, Osaka Univesity (2010).
69.
SasanoMSakaiHYakoKWakasaTAsajiSFujitaKet alGamow-teller unit cross sections of the (p, n) reaction at 198 and 297 mev on medium-heavy nuclei. Phys Rev (2009) 79:024602. 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.024602
70.
Van IsackerPMacchiavelliAO. Neutron–proton spin–spin correlations in the ground states of N=Z nuclei. Eur Phys J A (2021) 57:178. 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00489-6
71.
MacchiavelliAOCrawfordHLCampbellCMClarkRMCromazMFallonP. Ground state neutron-proton spin-spin correlations studied by (p,p’) and (d,d’) scattering. iThemba Proposal PR353 (2019).
72.
McCullenJDBaymanBFZamickL. Spectroscopy in the nuclear 1f7/2 shell. Phys Rev (1964) 134B515–B538. 10.1103/PhysRev.134.B515
Summary
Keywords
single-particle strength, long- and short-range correlations, nuclear reactions, isospin dependence, effective mass, neutron matter, charge radii and effective charges, spin-spin correlations
Citation
Macchiavelli AO, Paschalis S and Petri M (2025) Some aspects of the quenching of single-particle strength in atomic nuclei. Front. Phys. 13:1530428. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2025.1530428
Received
18 November 2024
Accepted
20 January 2025
Published
19 March 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Sean Freeman, European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Switzerland
Reviewed by
Grigory Nigmatkulov, University of Illinois Chicago, United States
Daniel Bazin, Michigan State University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Macchiavelli, Paschalis and Petri.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Augusto O. Macchiavelli, macchiavelao@ornl.gov
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.