General Commentary ARTICLE
Erratum: “Comparing the Iowa and Soochow gambling tasks in opiate users”
- School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
by Upton, D J., Kerestes, R., and Stout, J. C. (2012). Front. Neurosci. 6:34. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00034
We would like to apply a correction to the pay-off distributions of the Soochow Gambling Task presented in Table 2 of the manuscript. Decks C and D do not yield a gain on every trial, which has been corrected with the addition of a “–” in columns representing decks C and D. Furthermore, the 5th and 10th trials for both decks C and D in the Soochow Gambling Task, are associated with a win of $5.25 and $3.25, respectively. This was previously not shown in the table and has been inserted.
Table 2. The pay-off distributions of the Iowa Gambling Task and Soochow Gambling Task for the first 10 trials, adapted and modified from Ahn et al. (2008).
Citation: Upton DJ, Kerestes R and Stout JC (2013) Erratum: “Comparing the Iowa and Soochow gambling tasks in opiate users”. Front. Psychol. 4:85. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00085
Received: 06 February 2013; Accepted: 06 February 2013;
Published online: 26 February 2013.
Edited by:Scott A. Huettel, Duke University, USA
Reviewed by:Scott A. Huettel, Duke University, USA
Copyright © 2013 Upton, Kerestes and Stout. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.