The brain is safely sealed inside the cranium, with virtually no direct interaction with other parts of the body and the outside world. Nevertheless, it constantly processes the information conveyed by several sensory modalities in order to create representations of both body and outer world and to generate appropriates motor responses (Ehrsson et al., 2005; Farnè et al., 2005; Green and Angelaki, 2010). For example, vision can convey information about dangerous stimuli to trigger the generation of appropriate motor response (e.g., escape, avoidance, fight, etc.). Rather than processing sensory inputs in isolation, the brain integrates sensory information (Stein and Meredith, 1993; Fetsch et al., 2012) by forming reliable and robust representation of the external world and body. For example, when both visual and auditory input inform about the same danger, an appropriate motor response is more rapid and efficient (Sereno and Huang, 2006; Laing et al.).
Until a few decades ago, it was strongly believed that sensory (or multisensory) integration occurred only in high-level/associative areas or the cortex (Ghazanfar and Schroeder, 2006; Pavani and Galfano). Recently, several “new” multisensory areas have been discovered (Gobbelé et al., 2003; Pietrini et al., 2004), suggesting that a larger portion of the cortex is engaged in multisensory processing. Additional evidence suggests that multisensory integration also occurs in sub-cortical areas (Kuraoka and Nakamura, 2007; Amad et al., 2014). Finally, and perhaps surprisingly, some studies have demonstrated that multisensory processing occurs in primary sensory areas that were traditionally considered to be uni-sensory (Zangaladze et al., 1999; Murray et al., 2005).
Theories such as “neural reuse” (Anderson, 2010) and “metamodal” organization of the brain (Pascual-Leone and Hamilton, 2001) attempt to provide new paradigms for brain functioning taking into account widespread multisensory integration. The evolutionary advantage of multisensory integration might be the resulting availability of more reliable representations of the external world and body (Elliott et al., 2010; Grüneberg et al.) based on multiple sensory inputs and the resilience to brain injuries and sensory loss (Sarno et al., 2003; Pasqualotto and Proulx, 2012; Brown et al.; Finocchietti et al.). Indeed, multisensory integration has been reported in various experimental tasks including spatial representation (Pasqualotto et al., 2005), object recognition (Woods and Newell, 2004; Harris et al.; Höchenberger et al.; Laing et al.), movement perception (Grüneberg et al.; Imaizumi et al.; Uesaki and Ashida), body representation (Pasqualotto and Proulx, 2015; Pavani and Galfano; Tajadura-Jiménez et al.; Yiltiz and Chen), emotional processing (Miu et al.; Piwek et al.), attentional deployment (Spence, 2002; Depowski et al.), language (Gallese, 2008; Myachykov and Tomlin, 2008; Myachykov et al., 2012; Lam et al.; Shaw and Bortfeld), embodied reasoning (Dumitru, 2014), sensory awareness (Cox and Hong), numerical cognition (Dumitru and Joergensen), auditory perception (Brogaard and Gatzia), and time perception (Homma and Ashida).
The articles included in this special issue offer novel insights about recent developments within the field of multisensory integration, and we believe that they will help understanding the multisensory nature of brain functioning.
Statements
Author contributions
AP wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MD and AM provided comments, additions, and further improvements. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
MD was supported by a Marie Curie FP7-PEOPLE-IAPP fellowship (grant number 610986).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Amad A. Cachia A. Gorwood P. Pins D. Delmaire C. Rolland B. et al . (2014). The multimodal connectivity of the hippocampal complex in auditory and visual hallucinations. Mol. Psychiatry19, 184–191. 10.1038/mp.2012.181
2
Anderson M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behav. Brain Sci.33, 245–266. 10.1017/S0140525X10000853
3
Dumitru M. L. (2014). Moving stimuli guide retrieval and (in)validation of coordination simulations. Cogn. Process.15, 397–403. 10.1007/s10339-014-0604-6
4
Elliott M. T. Wing A. M. Welchman A. E. (2010). Multisensory cues improve sensorimotor synchronisation. Eur. J. Neurosci.31, 1828–1835. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07205.x
5
Ehrsson H. H. Holmes N. P. Passingham R. E. (2005). Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. J. Neurosci.25, 10564–10573. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0800-05.2005
6
Farnè A. Iriki A. Làdavas E. (2005). Shaping multisensory action–space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia43, 238–248. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.010
7
Fetsch C. R. Pouget A. DeAngelis G. C. Angelaki D. E. (2012). Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration. Nat. Neurosci.15, 146–154. 10.1038/nn.2983
8
Gallese V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: the neural exploitation hypothesis. Soc. Neurosci.3, 317–333. 10.1080/17470910701563608
9
Ghazanfar A. A. Schroeder C. E. (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory?Trends Cogn. Sci.10, 278–285. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008
10
Gobbelé R. Schürmann M. Forss N. Juottonen K. Buchner H. Hari R. (2003). Activation of the human posterior parietal and temporoparietal cortices during audiotactile interaction. Neuroimage20, 503–511. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00312-4
11
Green A. M. Angelaki D. E. (2010). Multisensory integration: resolving sensory ambiguities to build novel representations. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.20, 353–360. 10.1016/j.conb.2010.04.009
12
Kuraoka K. Nakamura K. (2007). Responses of single neurons in monkey amygdala to facial and vocal emotions. J. Neurophysiol.97, 1379–1387. 10.1152/jn.00464.2006
13
Murray M. M. Molholm S. Michel C. M. Heslenfeld D. J. Ritter W. Javitt D. C. et al . (2005). Grabbing your ear: Rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment. Cereb. Cortex15, 963–974. 10.1093/cercor/bhh197
14
Myachykov A. Tomlin R. (2008). Perceptual priming and syntactic choice in Russian sentence production. J. Cogn. Sci.9, 31–48. 10.17791/jcs.2008.9.1.31
15
Myachykov A. Garrod S. Scheepers C. (2012). Determinants of structural choice in visually-situated sentence production. Acta Psychol.141, 304–315. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.006
16
Pascual-Leone A. Hamilton R. (2001). The metamodal organization of the brain. Prog. Brain Res.134, 427–445. 10.1016/S0079-6123(01)34028-1
17
Pasqualotto A. Finucane C. M. Newell F. N. (2005). Visual and haptic representations of scenes are updated with observer movement. Exp. Brain Res.166, 481–488. 10.1007/s00221-005-2388-5
18
Pasqualotto A. Proulx M. J. (2012). The role of visual experience for the neural basis of spatial cognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.36, 1179–1187. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.008
19
Pasqualotto A. Proulx M. J. (2015). Two-dimensional rubber-hand illusion: the Dorian Gray hand illusion. Multisens. Res.28, 101–110. 10.1163/22134808-00002473
20
Pietrini P. Furey M. L. Ricciardi E. Gobbini M. I. Wu W. H. C. Cohen L. G. et al . (2004). Beyond sensory images: object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.101, 5658–5663. 10.1073/pnas.0400707101
21
Sarno S. Erasmus L. P. Lipp B. Schlaegel W. (2003). Multisensory integration after traumatic brain injury: a reaction time study between pairings of vision, touch and audition. Brain Inj.17, 413–426. 10.1080/0269905031000070161
22
Sereno M. I. Huang R. S. (2006). A human parietal face area contains aligned head-centered visual and tactile maps. Nat. Neurosci.9, 1337–1343. 10.1038/nn1777
23
Spence C. (2002). Multisensory attention and tactile information-processing. Behav. Brain Res.135, 57–64. 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00155-9
24
Stein B. E. Meredith M. A. (1993). The Merging of the Senses. Boston, MA: The MITPress.
25
Woods A. T. Newell F. N. (2004). Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes. J. Physiol.98, 147–159. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.006
26
Zangaladze A. Epstein C. M. Grafton S. T. Sathian K. (1999). Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature401, 587–590. 10.1038/44139
Summary
Keywords
multisensory integration, body representation, attentional deployment, emotional processing, numerical cognition, language, embodied reasoning, time processing
Citation
Pasqualotto A, Dumitru ML and Myachykov A (2016) Editorial: Multisensory Integration: Brain, Body, and World. Front. Psychol. 6:2046. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02046
Received
17 December 2015
Accepted
23 December 2015
Published
12 January 2016
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited and reviewed by
Bernhard Hommel, Leiden University, Netherlands
Updates
Copyright
© 2016 Pasqualotto, Dumitru and Myachykov.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Magda L. Dumitru magda.dumitru@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.