Corrigendum: Where am I? Who am I? The Relation Between Spatial Cognition, Social Cognition, and Individual Differences in the Built Environment
- 1Crossmodal Cognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- 2European Network for Brain Evolution Research, The Hague, Netherlands
- 3Department of Philosophy, University of Durham, Durham, UK
- 4School of Society, Enterprise and Environment, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK
by Proulx, M. J., Todorov, O. S., Taylor Aiken, A., and de Sousa, A. A. (2016). Front. Psychol. 7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00064
Reason for Corrigendum:
There was a mistake in the figure heading for Figure 4. The heading should note that the left panel is somatosensory and the right is motor cortex. The correct figure heading appears below. The authors apologize for the mistake. This error does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Figure 4. The Penfield Homunculus: a visual representation of the mapping of body space in the somatosensory (left panel) and motor (right panel) cortices of the brain, with the size of the body representing the size of the area of cortex devoted to it, and hence the sensitivity of that region as well. From Penfield and Rasmussen (1950). THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN. ©1950 Gale, a part of Cengage Learning, Inc. Reproduced by permission: www.cengage.com/permissions.
All authors listed, have made substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: spatial cognition, social cognition, navigation, personality, reference frames, allocentric frame of reference, egocentric frame of reference, cognitive neuroscience
Citation: Proulx MJ, Todorov OS, Taylor Aiken A and de Sousa AA (2016) Corrigendum: Where am I? Who am I? The Relation Between Spatial Cognition, Social Cognition, and Individual Differences in the Built Environment. Front. Psychol. 7:554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00554
Received: 31 March 2016; Accepted: 04 April 2016;
Published: 19 May 2016.
Edited and reviewed by: Isabella Pasqualini, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
Copyright © 2016 Proulx, Todorov, Taylor Aiken and de Sousa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alexandra A. de Sousa, email@example.com