Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 30 June 2016
Sec. Psychology of Language

Corrigendum: Limits on Monolingualism? A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Abilities to Integrate Lexical Tone in Novel Word Learning

  • Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

A corrigendum on
Limits on Monolingualism? A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Abilities to Integrate Lexical Tone in Novel Word Learning

by Singh, L., Poh, F. L. S., and Fu, C. S. L. (2016). Front. Psychol. 7:667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00667

Reason for Corrigendum:

Due to an oversight by the authors, Figures 3, 4 were switched. Figure 3 displays the results of Experiment 1 (Mandarin-English bilingual infants) and Figure 4 displays the results of Experiment 2 (Mandarin monolingual infants). The authors apologize for this mistake. This error does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Fixation times to the visual stimulus for Same, Switch (similar), and Switch (distinct) trials in 12-13-month-old bilingual infants (error bars: SEM).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Fixation times to the visual stimulus for Same, Switch (similar), and Switch (distinct) trials in 12-13-month-old Mandarin monolingual infants (error bars: SEM).

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the National University of Singapore, Singapore to LS (HSS R-581-000-178-646), to a Ministry of Education Tier 1 Academic Research Fund (FY2013-FRC2-009) grant to LS, and to a grant from the Singapore Children's Society to CF.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Aloysia Tan, Desirene Poon, and Xian Hui Seet for assistance for assistance with stimulus recordings and to Cathi Best, Janet Werker, and Chris Fennell for methodological guidance.

Keywords: lexical tone, phoneme discrimination, infant speech perception, Mandarin Chinese, word learning

Citation: Singh L, Poh FLS and Fu CSL (2016) Corrigendum: Limits on Monolingualism? A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Infants' Abilities to Integrate Lexical Tone in Novel Word Learning. Front. Psychol. 7:992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00992

Received: 18 May 2016; Accepted: 16 June 2016;
Published: 30 June 2016.

Edited and reviewed by: Miquel Simonet, University of Arizona, USA

Copyright © 2016 Singh, Poh and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Leher Singh, psyls@nus.edu.sg

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.