Impact Factor 2.089

The world's most-cited Multidisciplinary Psychology journal

Correction ARTICLE

Front. Psychol., 27 September 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01404

Corrigendum: The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study

Peter Hilpert1,2*, Ashley K. Randall3, Piotr Sorokowski4, David C. Atkins1, Agnieszka Sorokowska4, Khodabakhsh Ahmadi5, Ahmad M. Alghraibeh6, Richmond Aryeetey7, Anna Bertoni8, Karim Bettache9, Marta Błażejewska4, Guy Bodenmann2, Jessica Borders3, Tiago S. Bortolini10,11, Marina Butovskaya12, Felipe N. Castro13, Hakan Cetinkaya14, Diana Cunha15, Oana A. David16, Anita DeLongis17, Fahd A. Dileym18, Alejandra D. C. Domínguez Espinosa19, Silvia Donato8, Daria Dronova12, Seda Dural20, Maryanne Fisher21, Tomasz Frackowiak4, Evrim Gulbetekin22, Aslıhan Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya23, Karolina Hansen24, Wallisen T. Hattori25, Ivana Hromatko26, Raffaella Iafrate8, Bawo O. James27, Feng Jiang28, Charles O. Kimamo29, David B. King30, Fırat Koç31, Amos Laar7, Fívia De Araújo Lopes13, Rocio Martinez32, Norbert Mesko33, Natalya Molodovskaya4, Khadijeh Moradi34, Zahrasadat Motahari35, Jean C. Natividade36, Joseph Ntayi37, Oluyinka Ojedokun38, Mohd S. B. Omar-Fauzee39, Ike E. Onyishi40, Barış Özener41, Anna Paluszak4, Alda Portugal42, Ana P. Relvas15, Muhammad Rizwan43, Svjetlana Salkičević26, Ivan Sarmány-Schuller44, Eftychia Stamkou45, Stanislava Stoyanova46, Denisa Šukolová47, Nina Sutresna48, Meri Tadinac26, Andero Teras49, Edna L. Tinoco Ponciano50, Ritu Tripathi51, Nachiketa Tripathi52, Mamta Tripathi52, Noa Vilchinsky53, Feng Xu2,54, Maria E. Yamamoto13 and Gyesook Yoo55
  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, DC, USA
  • 2Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
  • 4Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
  • 5Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 6Department of Psychology, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 7School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
  • 8Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • 9Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 10Graduate Program in Morphological Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 11Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience Unit, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 12Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
  • 13Laboratory of Evolution of Human Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
  • 14Department of Psychology, Faculty of Languages History and Geography, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
  • 15Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • 16Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • 17Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • 18Department of Psychology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 19Department of Psychology, Universidad Iberoamericana, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
  • 20Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey
  • 21Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • 22Department of Psychology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
  • 23Department of Anthropology, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
  • 24Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • 25Department of Public Health, Medical School, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
  • 26Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 27Department of Clinical Services, Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital, Benin-City, Nigeria
  • 28Department of Organization and Human Resources Management, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China
  • 29Department of Psychology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
  • 30Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
  • 31Department of Anatomy, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
  • 32Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  • 33Institute of Psychology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
  • 34Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
  • 35Institute of Psychology, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran
  • 36Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 37Faculty of Computing and Management Science, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda
  • 38Department of Pure & Applied Psychology, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria
  • 39School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia
  • 40Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
  • 41Department of Anthropology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 42Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal
  • 43Institute of Clinical Psychology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
  • 44Department of Psychological Sciences, Constantine The Philosopher University in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
  • 45Department of Social Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 46Department of Psychology, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
  • 47Department of Psychology, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
  • 48Faculty of Sports and Health Education, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung, Indonesia
  • 49Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
  • 50Institute of Psychology, University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 51Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, Bangalore, India
  • 52Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, India
  • 53Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
  • 54Department of Education for Students, Guangdong Construction Polytechnic, Guangdong, China
  • 55Department of Child & Family Studies, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea

A corrigendum on
The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study

by Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., et al. (2016). Front. Psychol. 7:1106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106

Due to an oversight, the name of the author “Ahmad M. Alghraibeh” was incorrectly spelled as “Ahmad M. Aghraibeh.” The correct version is shown above. The authors apologize for this oversight. This error does not affect the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

The original article has been updated.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Keywords: dyadic coping, relationship satisfaction, culture, multilevel modeling, gender differences

Citation: Hilpert P, Randall AK, Sorokowski P, Atkins DC, Sorokowska A, Ahmadi K, Alghraibeh AM, Aryeetey R, Bertoni A, Bettache K, Błażejewska M, Bodenmann G, Borders J, Bortolini TS, Butovskaya M, Castro FN, Cetinkaya H, Cunha D, David OA, DeLongis A, Dileym FA, Domínguez Espinosa ADC, Donato S, Dronova D, Dural S, Fisher M, Frackowiak T, Gulbetekin E, Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya A, Hansen K, Hattori WT, Hromatko I, Iafrate R, James BO, Jiang F, Kimamo CO, King DB, Koç F, Laar A, Lopes FDA, Martinez R, Mesko N, Molodovskaya N, Moradi K, Motahari Z, Natividade JC, Ntayi J, Ojedokun O, Omar-Fauzee MSB, Onyishi IE, Özener B, Paluszak A, Portugal A, Relvas AP, Rizwan M, Salkičević S, Sarmány-Schuller I, Stamkou E, Stoyanova S, Šukolová D, Sutresna N, Tadinac M, Teras A, Tinoco Ponciano EL, Tripathi R, Tripathi N, Tripathi M, Vilchinsky N, Xu F, Yamamoto ME and Yoo G (2016) Corrigendum: The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study. Front. Psychol. 7:1404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01404

Received: 26 August 2016; Accepted: 01 September 2016;
Published: 27 September 2016.

Edited and reviewed by: Keiko Ishii, Kobe University, Japan

Copyright © 2016 Hilpert, Randall, Sorokowski, Atkins, Sorokowska, Ahmadi, Alghraibeh, Aryeetey, Bertoni, Bettache, Błażejewska, Bodenmann, Borders, Bortolini, Butovskaya, Castro, Cetinkaya, Cunha, David, DeLongis, Dileym, Domínguez Espinosa, Donato, Dronova, Dural, Fisher, Frackowiak, Gulbetekin, Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya, Hansen, Hattori, Hromatko, Iafrate, James, Jiang, Kimamo, King, Koç, Laar, Lopes, Martinez, Mesko, Molodovskaya, Moradi, Motahari, Natividade, Ntayi, Ojedokun, Omar-Fauzee, Onyishi, Özener, Paluszak, Portugal, Relvas, Rizwan, Salkičević, Sarmány-Schuller, Stamkou, Stoyanova, Šukolová, Sutresna, Tadinac, Teras, Tinoco Ponciano, Tripathi, Tripathi, Tripathi, Vilchinsky, Xu, Yamamoto and Yoo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Peter Hilpert, hilpert@uw.edu