Impact Factor 2.129 | CiteScore 2.40
More on impact ›

Correction ARTICLE

Front. Psychol., 28 May 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00873

Corrigendum: The Use of Subscores in Higher Education: When Is This Useful?

  • 1Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Psychometrics and Statistics, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  • 2Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Education, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

A corrigendum on
The Use of Subscores in Higher Education: When Is This Useful?

by Meijer, R. R., Boevé, A. J., Tendeiro, J. N., Bosker, R. J., and Albers, C. J. (2017). Front. Psychol. 8:305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00305

In the original article, there was an error: There were a couple of incorrect numbers.

A correction has been made to the RESULTS section Paragraph 2.

Note that the changes had no further effect on any conclusions.

Sinharay (2010) for example, reported an average operational subtest reliability of 0.38 for subtests with an average of 19 items. The PRMSE in estimating the true subtest score from the observed total score (PRMSEx) was 0.80 for both the conceptual subtest and the factual knowledge subtest.

The original article has been updated.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Sinharay, S. (2010). How often do subscores have added value? Results from operational and simulated data. J. Educ. Meas. 47, 150–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00106.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: classroom testing, diagnostic testing, formative feedback, test format, subscores, validity open-ended questions

Citation: Meijer RR, Boevé AJ, Tendeiro JN, Bosker RJ and Albers CJ (2018) Corrigendum: The Use of Subscores in Higher Education: When Is This Useful? Front. Psychol. 9:873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00873

Received: 09 February 2018; Accepted: 15 May 2018;
Published: 28 May 2018.

Edited and reviewed by: Meryem Yilmaz Soylu, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States

Copyright © 2018 Meijer, Boevé, Tendeiro, Bosker and Albers. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rob R. Meijer, r.r.meijer@rug.nl