Original Research ARTICLE
Testing is More Desirable When it is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking
- 1Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
- 2Bielefeld University, Germany
Testing is a well-established desirable difficulty. Yet there are still some open issues regarding the benefits of testing that need to be addressed. First, the possibility to increase its benefits by adapting the sequence of test questions to the learners’ level of knowledge has scarcely been explored. In view of theories that emphasize the benefits of adapting learning tasks to learner knowledge, it is reasonable to assume that the common practice of providing all learners with the same test questions is not optimal. Second, it is an open question as to whether the testing effect prevails if stronger control conditions than the typical restudy condition are used. We addressed these issues in an experiment with N = 200 university students who were randomly assigned to (a) adaptive testing, (b) non-adaptive testing, or note-taking (c) without or (d) with focus guidance. In an initial study phase, all participants watched an e-lecture. Afterwards, they processed its content according to their assigned conditions. One week later, all learners took a posttest. As main results, we found that adaptive testing yielded higher learning outcomes than non-adaptive testing. These benefits were mediated by the adaptive learners’ higher testing performance and lower perceived cognitive demand during testing. Furthermore, we found that both testing groups outperformed the note-taking groups. Jointly, our results show that the benefits of testing can be enhanced by adapting the sequence of test questions to learners’ knowledge and that testing can be more effective than note-taking.
Keywords: testing, Test-based learning, Desirable difficulties, adaptivity, Note-taking, focusing
Received: 15 Jun 2018;
Accepted: 03 Dec 2018.
Edited by:Ralf Rummer, University of Kassel, Germany
Reviewed by:Angela J. Fawcett, Swansea University, United Kingdom
Alexander Eitel, University of Freiburg, Germany
Copyright: © 2018 Heitmann, Grund, Berthold, Fries and Roelle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Miss. Svenja Heitmann, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany, email@example.com