ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol., 24 April 2019

Sec. Eating Behavior

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00921

Assessment of Family Functioning and Eating Disorders – The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem

  • Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Psychology, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

Abstract

The aim of the study was to measure whether people at increased risk for eating disorders (EDs) and people without an increased risk of EDs differ from each other in the assessment of family functioning (FF) and self-esteem (SE) dimensions. Moreover, the correlations between FF, EDs, and SE were verified, looking for the mediating role of SE in the context of the FF and EDs. The research was conducted on the group of 160 people aged from 18 to 47 years, including 74 people at increased risk for EDs. We used: The Family APGAR (Adaptability, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve); The SCOFF Questionnaire; The Multidimensional Self-Esteem Inventory, MSEI. Analyses indicate that the compared groups differ significantly in terms of EDs, assessment of FF, and all components of SE, in such a way that people without an increased risk of EDs are characterized by a more positive assessment of FF and higher SE in all its dimensions. All SE dimensions, except defensive high SE, are mediators in the relationship of FF with EDs. In therapeutic interactions, it is worth focusing on the SE dimensions, as they are one of the mediation elements in the relationship between the assessment of FF and EDs.

Introduction

Eating disorders (EDs) are a group of disorders marked by abnormal eating attitudes which lead to significant disturbances in maintenance of healthy body weight (Le Grange et al., 2014; Rzońca et al., 2016), as well as serious and potentially long-lasting health problems, including death (O’Brien et al., 2017; Sadeh-Sharvit et al., 2018). Generally, EDs are first diagnosed before reaching adulthood (Striegel-Moore and Bulik, 2007), however, they may persist throughout a person’s life (Mangweth-Matzek et al., 2006; Hilbert et al., 2012; Tabler and Utz, 2015; Smink et al., 2018). In many cases, ED patients display instability of symptoms, switching from significant weight loss in adolescence to binging, and ceasing the purging behaviors in adulthood (Lavender et al., 2011). Moreover, non-diagnostic symptoms of EDs may occur in a broad population (Zarychta et al., 2017) and become more common among older persons (de Jong et al., 2018). The category of EDs includes both specific disorders such as anorexia (anorexia nervosa), bulimia (bulimia nervosa) and non-specific disorders (e.g., binge eating disorder or night eating syndrome) (Geliebter, 2002; Allison et al., 2005; Mitchison and Hay, 2014).

A review of the current literature on the subject indicates that both the etiology and the pathology of EDs are multifaceted (Latzer et al., 2009; McAdams and Smith, 2015) and still limited in understanding (McAdams et al., 2016). Researchers distinguish the biological (Striegel-Moore and Bulik, 2007; Weinberger-Litman et al., 2016; Haynos et al., 2018), individual (Loxton and Dawe, 2009; Farstad et al., 2016), cultural (Miller and Pumariega, 2001; Keel and Klump, 2003; Mayhew et al., 2017), and family factors as preventive or risk components in the development and maintenance of EDs (Denisoff and Endler, 2000; Leys et al., 2017). On the one hand, modern society is exposed to idealization of youth and the thinness presented in the mass-media (Thompson and Heinberg, 1999; Phelps et al., 2007; Striegel-Moore and Bulik, 2007). Several analyses (Murray et al., 1990; Eyal and Te’eni-Harari, 2013; Barcaccia et al., 2018; Ferguson, 2018; Griffiths et al., 2018) show that the body image represented on television, thinspiration/fitspiration websites, and magazine covers is commonly unrealistically thin for women or muscularity unideal for men, not reflecting the range of body shapes in the general population. On the other hand, biological predisposition and family related phenomena are also of significant importance as family provides grounds for comprehensive intellectual, emotional and social development, including personality and self-esteem (SE).

The multi-dimensional approach to EDs fits the diathesis-stress model of psychopathology. According to this paradigm, the development of EDs occurs as a result of the interaction of an individual’s biological or cognitive predispositions and severe environmental events (Hooley and Gotlib, 2000; Swearer and Hymel, 2015). Although the research literature on EDs is characterized by certain inconclusiveness (Balottin et al., 2017) as well as specific trends (von Ranson, 2008), various investigators report selected factors shared by both anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) patients. Individuals with AN and BN are often characterized by: perfectionism and scrupulousness (Joiner et al., 1997; von Ranson, 2008; Forsén Mantilla et al., 2017; Johnston et al., 2018), negative core beliefs about food and eating (Cooper and Hunt, 1998), body dissatisfaction (Troisi et al., 2006; Blodgett Salafia et al., 2015), self-criticism and low SE (Forsén Mantilla et al., 2017), alienation, shyness and social withdrawal (Leonidas and Dos Santos, 2017), shame and guilt (Burney and Irwin, 2000; Keith et al., 2009; Duffy and Henkel, 2016), anxiety (Egan et al., 2013; Stewart et al., 2015), alexithymia (Montebarocci et al., 2006; Pace et al., 2015), and perception of worse forms of family functioning (FF) (Keery et al., 2006).

Family functioning, often used as an umbrella term (McClellan and Cohen, 2007), encompasses a range of family constructs that reflect the nature of family relationships, cohesion and adaptability, sharing of decision making, mutual growth and self-fulfillment, caring and loving relationships, the commitment to share space, time and wealth, disclosure (Smilkstein, 1978; Kennedy et al., 2015). Although relationship between EDs and parental bonding is complex and not always well-defined (Holtom-Viesel and Allan, 2014), the results of several studies suggest the importance of familiar factors in specific and non-specific disorders (Allen et al., 2014; Tetzlaff and Hilbert, 2014; Balottin et al., 2017). For instance, some researchers (Le Grange et al., 2010; Holtom-Viesel and Allan, 2014) notice that EDs families describe their functioning as worse and more dysfunctional than control families, though there is little evidence for a typical pattern of such functioning. Moreover, the cross-sectional findings (Troisi et al., 2006) indicate that perception of FF in its different dimensions may be one of the important factors implicated in the negative body image assessment both in groups with AN and BN. Mayhew et al. (2017) observe that specific family dynamics, such as overprotection, intrusiveness, emotional unresponsiveness, and cross-generational enmeshment are related to EDs. Examples of factors which may be conducive to EDs and significantly affect their course as well as prognosis are: abnormal family relationships, both between the parents themselves (Blodgett Salafia et al., 2014), as well as between the parents and the children (Franko et al., 2008), an avoidance and inability to resolve conflicts (Erol et al., 2007; Gonçalves et al., 2016), overdependence, a lack of hierarchy and the loss of boundaries between family members (Barnhill and Taylor, 2001), a low level of attachment combined with a lack of affection and indifference as well as high expectations from the parents (Le Grange et al., 2010; Gonçalves et al., 2016; Cerniglia et al., 2017), and a negative parent-daughter relationship (Balottin et al., 2017; Korotana et al., 2018).

Nevertheless, the perception or experience of unsatisfying family relationship does not always result in EDs as the development of abnormal eating attitudes and behaviors may involve other intermediary mechanisms jointly responsible for such a relationship (Canals et al., 2009). Some researchers (Wei et al., 2005) indicate that FF can be associated with EDs beyond the direct links, and there is a need to explore more complex relations between both variables within a diathesis-stress approach. In their review, Zachrisson and Skårderud (2010) suggest theoretical hypotheses to explain the relationship between insecure attachment and eating pathology through the existence of some indirect factors.

Much of what we know about mediators and moderators of FF and EDs is based on the studies conducted to explore: personality characteristics, the intolerance of uncertainty, maladaptive emotional regulation, comparison with idealized others, perceived weight-related pressure, body dissatisfaction, and resilience. For example, some researchers (Eggert et al., 2007; Münch et al., 2016) show that higher neuroticism and lower extraversion mediate the relationship between insecure-resistant attachment and disordered eating. Others suggest (Sternheim et al., 2017) that a set of negative beliefs about uncertainty and a tendency to react negatively to uncertain situations and events may function as a moderating or mediating factor between attachment styles and ED-related symptoms. van Durme et al. (2015) indicate that deficits in the ability to effectively cope with challenging emotions partially mediates the relationships between attachment avoidance/anxiety and EDs. Still other authors (Tasca et al., 2009), testing a structural equation model of the association between attachment insecurity and ED symptoms, allude that body dissatisfaction and negative affect are mediators between the two factors. Finally, recent studies (Leys et al., 2017) reveal that resilience mediates the link between family dynamics and the occurrence of EDs.

Consistent with a diathesis-stress model, FF may promote the expression of EDs via self-esteem which is considered a vulnerability factor (Vohs et al., 1999). The focus on the concept of self-esteem in the present research arises from the sociometer theory (Leary, 2005) that explains self-esteem as an indicator of one’s relational evaluation. Thus, self-esteem reflects people’s beliefs concerning how they are perceived and assessed by others. The value attributed to the self is one of the most widely investigated aspects which are associated with EDs (Dada et al., 2017). The higher the degree to which an individual regards their relationship with another person as important, the lower their tendency to engage in dysfunctional behaviors. In the context of FF, it can be assumed that people’s feelings about themselves may be affected by parental evaluations remembered or lasting from childhood. Accordingly, self-esteem changes in response to a wide range of real and/or imagined rejections. While experience of positive ratings received from parents helps in building and maintaining child’s or adolescents’ healthy self-esteem, a feeling of negative assessment may lead to self-esteem reduction. Moreover, some studies (Vohs et al., 1999; Bardone et al., 2000) show that low self-esteem interacts with other factors to predict bulimic symptoms. Fairburn (2008) and colleagues (Fairburn et al., 2008) highlight self-esteem as a common characteristic among patients who binge, and a typical trait proceeding the eating problems. A longstanding and persistent negative view of the self, rooted in past events or experiences undergone in the present, may cause extremely self-critical esteem, generalized from “a specific failure” to “a general failure.” Therefore, low self-esteem appears to increase the risk of overvaluation of shape/weight, which in turn may lead to unhealthy weight-control practices, and consequently to eating-related psychopathology (Grilo, 2013; Pearl et al., 2014). A negative family history, reflected through a lack of warmth, unpredictability, criticism, overprotection and other adverse experiences may influence person’s dichotomous appraisals of self-worth and dysfunctional beliefs (Fairburn et al., 2008; Dalle Grave, 2013). Unstable identity is related to poor self-concept (fragile self-esteem and self-confidence), transferring to a major risk of EDs (Amianto et al., 2016). In turn, other studies provide preliminary and novel support that both mindful parenting skills and levels of self-compassion in adolescents help girls in the process of managing feelings of body shame and eating behaviors (Gouveia et al., 2018).

Additionally, transgenerational theories indicate that patterns transferred from one generation to another concerning, among others, intimacy models, autonomy, the system of values and coping skills have a direct influence on the functioning of the family – both as a unit as well as its individual members (Attili et al., 2004; Pilecki et al., 2014). Early experiences within a family context lead to the development of internal working models (IWM), theorized as beliefs in the self and others (Suzuki and Tomoda, 2015). A perception of parental dysfunctions toward oneself, such as inconsistency, intrusiveness or unresponsiveness, may result in an insecure IWM that activates some less functional strategies in dealing with anxiety (Attili et al., 2004). As parental attitudes have a long-term impact on a person’s functioning not only in childhood, but also in adulthood (Eddy et al., 2017), it is plausible to assume that internalization of an ambivalent or avoidant attachment style, may affect ones’ self-esteem, which can lead to depressive symptoms and EDs (Suzuki and Tomoda, 2015). In fact, current research (Chopik et al., 2013; Konrath et al., 2014) has confirmed that the impact of early childhood environments continues long after these bonds are formed, predicting the occurrence of the relationship dynamics after young adulthood and middle-age. Moreover, on the basis of a 7-year longitudinal study, Calam and Waller (1998) claim that the early teenage years seem to be crucial in the development of many women’s and men’s eating patterns in adulthood. Scabini et al. (2006) calls this process the transition to adulthood and affirms that the transition and its successful outcome strongly depend on the quality of family relationships.

Based on the former literature review, it could be argued that attention should be paid to individual characteristics and their mediating role with respect to the relationship between EDs and FF. Indeed, parent-child attachment seems to be associated with better treatment outcomes for EDs if patients receive therapy that promotes self-reflection (Tasca et al., 2009). The focus has been primarily on self-esteem as the key element of personality dimensions. A higher level of self-esteem seems to be connected with greater life satisfaction, activity, perseverance, optimism, and better coping with difficulties and loneliness. On the other hand, a lower level correlates with frequent experiencing of negative emotions (Geller et al., 2000), having difficulties with establishing social connections (Feixas et al., 2010), being more vulnerable to day-to-day incidents (Gila et al., 2005), seeing difficulties as insurmountable obstacles, an avoidant attitude toward problems and challenges (Martyn-Nemeth et al., 2009) as well as the repeated occurrence of psychosomatic symptoms (Mazzeo and Espelage, 2002; Łaguna et al., 2007).

In the context of the literature on the subject, the following assumptions were made: there is a difference regarding FF between persons with an increased risk to ED and those not suffering from such disorders (without ED) (hypothesis 1); the aforementioned groups differ in all dimensions of self-esteem (hypothesis 2); there is a positive correlation between FF and the dimensions of self-esteem accompanied by a negative correlation between ED and FF, as well as ED and self-esteem dimensions (hypothesis 3); there are dimensions of self-esteem which mediate the relationship between FF and ED (hypothesis 4) – thus providing a possible explanation why only some individuals with a negative assessment of the relationships in their family of origin suffer from an ED.

While hypotheses 3 and 4 are useful with a potential meaningful contribution to the literature, as only a few studies have analyzed how the perceived interpersonal relationships are related to EDs through the co-occurrence of other psychological variables (Pelletier Brochu et al., 2018), hypotheses 1 and 2 are very well-known already. However, the selection of self-esteem and FF as differentiating variables between the study and control groups (to verify 1st and 2nd hypotheses) was based on the transdiagnostic theory of EDs, in which it is assumed that a dysfunctional evaluation of self-worth and interpersonal problems are crucial in all types of EDs (de Jong et al., 2018). Moreover, the vast majority of studies concerns predominantly adolescent participants. Conversely, the aim of the present research was to reach older respondents representing early and middle adulthood.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted on 160 persons (80% women) in the age range of 18–47 (M = 23.18; SD = 5.06). The respondents were recruited from a social networking service dedicated to setting up ED support groups (Foundation “Światło dla Życia” – one of the first foundations in Poland that offer professional help to women and men with an ED, “Szklane Motylki” – a social network where individuals with ED problems associate themselves to exchange their ED experiences; the Standing Committee on Public Health – SCOPH – where EDs is one of the most important areas of concern). The low-risk control group (N = 86) was selected based on their score in the SCOFF Questionnaire (Sick, Control, One, Fat, and Food) (<2). The study group (N = 74) was chosen as being at risk of an ED based on the established SCOFF cut-off of ≥2 positive answers (Solmi et al., 2015). Those persons who were willing to participate in the study were contacted via a private message and provided with a battery of questionnaires, preceded with a specific instruction. The choice of the persons at increased risk for EDs through a social means was driven by the assumption that many individuals with anorexia, bulimia, and other non-specific disorders do not seek or receive treatment from specialist services (DeJong et al., 2013; Mitchison and Hay, 2014), and their disorder is not highly visible to others. The recruitment was done from a community sample, including women and not adolescents. The use of a non-clinical sample was chosen to add some new information; as previous research with the use of such groups have found some inconsistent outcomes (Mazzeo and Espelage, 2002).

The study group’s median age was 21 years with a range of 18–43 (69% women), and the control group’s median age was 23 years with a range of 18–47 (93% women). The control group was matched as closely as possible to the study group, according to appropriate continuous variables. While sex (control group: 68%; study group: 93%; p = 0.001), age (control group: M = 24.57; SD = 5.635; study group: M = 21.57; SD = 3.738; p = 0.001), and status of studying/working (p = 0.004) were different between both groups, the place of residence (p = 0.995) was comparable. Participants were not asked for detailed information about body mass index (BMI) as BMI is presently required for anorexia and not for other EDs (Gianini et al., 2017). Although the weight criterion used to diagnose EDs should be grounded in BMI (Hebebrand et al., 2004), more recent studies give no evidence (Machado et al., 2017) or modest support (Dakanalis et al., 2018) for the new DSM-5 severity ratings based on BMI level.

All of the respondents were assured of the confidentiality of their information and gave informed and written consent for their participation in the study. The research project was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Institute of Psychology at the University of Szczecin (KB 03/2018).

Method

For the purpose of verification of the hypotheses, the following were used: The Family APGAR (Adaptability, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve Scale) by Smilkstein et al. (1982), The SCOFF Questionnaire by Morgan et al. (2000), The Multidimensional Self-Esteem Inventory, MSEI by O’Brien and Epstein (1988).

Family APGAR is a brief screening tool used for a quick assessment of 5 dimensions of FF: adaptability, partnership, growth, emotions, and satisfaction with the time spent with the family (Namysłowska et al., 2000). Each of the 5 statements is assessed by the respondent in terms of the extent to which the person agrees with it – the scale ranges from 0 points (hardly ever) to 2 points (almost always). The lower the score, the greater the indication of a dysfunctional family system. Cronbach’s α reliability for the test proved to be satisfactory and amounted to 0.879 in the current sample. A single factor structure of the questionnaire (KMO measure of sampling adequacy 0.851; 67.522% of the explained variation) was also confirmed. Family APGAR correlates with other indices of FF, such as the Pless-Satterwhite FF Index (Ko et al., 2015), and psychological and physical health outcomes (Wu et al., 2010; Hai et al., 2017). A more negative evaluation of the family of origin is associated with higher loneliness (Wu et al., 2010) and fearful attachment (Diehl et al., 1998). Conversely, higher scores on the secure attachment style correlate positively with Family APGAR (Diehl et al., 1998).

The SCOFF Questionnaire is a popular and highly effective tool used in the United States and Western Europe, and increasingly more often in Poland, for the purpose of the identification of eating habits related to anorexia and bulimia (Morgan et al., 1999, 2000; Tsong and Smart, 2015) not only in clinical settings, but in the general population as well (Solmi et al., 2015). It is easy to apply and score (e.g., “Do you make yourself sick because you feel uncomfortably full?”; “Do you believe yourself to be fat when others say you are too thin?”), as consists of 5 questions to which the respondent gives either a positive “yes” or negative “no” answer. The number of “yes” responses is computed. The questionnaire revealed a single factor structure (KMO = 0.726; 43.431% of the explained variation). The respondents who scored 2 or more points were classified as belonging to the group of increased risk of EDs. In the present research, the average SCOFF score in the study group was M = 2.97 (SD = 0.09), while in the control group, it was M = 0.46 (SD = 0.50). Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of the SCOFF was measured in order to assess its validity. The area of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, widely accepted as a method of selecting an optimal cut-off point for a test (Akobeng, 2007), showed moderate accuracy (0.730) with a 95% confidence interval of 0.653–0.807. The result is consistent with previous studies (Tsong and Smart, 2015). Therefore, it can be assumed that the SCOFF in the present study satisfactorily discriminates between individuals with a low-risk for an ED and those with a high-risk for an ED.

The MSEI is a 116-item self-report test. Respondents rate the items on a 5-point Likert scale: in the first part, the scoring is from 1 – strongly disagree to 5 – strongly agree, and in the second part from 1 – hardly ever to 5 – very often. The profile of the respondents concerns the following 11 scales: global self-esteem (satisfaction with the self and confidence), competence (ability to master new tasks), lovability (ability to express and receive affection), likeability (feeling accepted and liked by others), personal power (being assertive and able to influence others), self-control (being disciplined, persistent, able to set, and reach one’s goals), moral self-acceptance (satisfaction with one’s moral values and acting accordingly), physical attractiveness (being satisfied with one’s body image), vitality (motor coordination and the feeling of being fit), identity integration (the self’s internal integrity), and defensive high self-esteem (defensive reaction of increasing one’s self-esteem) (O’Brien and Epstein, 2009). Cronbach’s alpha for the entire scale showed high internal consistency and amounted to α = 0.966 in the present study. Eight of 10 subscales demonstrated Cronbach’s alpha equal or higher than 0.800: competence (α = 0.808), lovability (α = 0.825), likeability (α = 0.808), personal power (α = 0.800), self-control (α = 0.744), moral self-acceptance (α = 0.812), physical attractiveness (α = 0.863), vitality (α = 0.878), identity integration (α = 0.843), and defensive high self-esteem (α = 0.706).

The statistical analyses employed to verify the assumed hypotheses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics software, ver. 23. The statistics for Student t tests for independent samples were calculated, and the correlation analysis was done using Pearson’s r coefficient. A univariate covariance analysis was applied to assess whether the differences between the control group and the study group could also be accounted for by some sociodemographic data (sex, age, status of studying/working, and place of residence). The linear regression analysis was used to examine if and how much sex as a potential confounder in the model would distort the relationship between exposure and outcome variables.

The PROCESS macro (version 3.2) was run to examine the indirect effects of each dimension of self-esteem separately on the relationship between FF and EDs. FF was the independent variable and the factor of EDs was the dependent variable. General self-esteem and all its ten components were mediating variables. Thus, there were eleven single-level mediation models no. 4 (Hayes, 2017), involving three-variable systems (Figure 1). For the current analysis, bootstrapping procedures were implemented. As recommended by Preacher and Hayes (2008), 5000 bootstrap samples and 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate the indirect effects that are considered significant if they exclude zero. This method appears to be superior to traditional mediation analyses because it does not require the data to adhere to assumptions of normality (Hayes, 2017).

FIGURE 1

Results

According to the research aims, the first step was to check whether persons with an increased risk for ED (study group) and low-risk individuals (control group) show any differences in terms of the assessment of FF (hypothesis 1) and all dimensions of self-esteem (hypothesis 2). The results of the comparison – arithmetic mean (M), standard deviation (SD) for all of the analyzed variables, values of the Student t-test, significance level p and values of d Cohen are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Control group (n = 86)Study group (n = 74)
MSDMSDtpd Cohen
Family functioning6.0582.7544.5133.0933.3410.0010.527
Global self-esteem27.9887.57921.4457.3765.512<0.0010.874
Competence33.0696.50028.4186.7334.438<0.0010.702
Lovability32.8258.53526.9597.4824.587<0.0010.730
Likeability30.5816.45926.0276.7574.353<0.0010.638
Personal power31.6626.20527.6756.8103.873<0.0010.612
Self-control29.2676.59825.1626.2374.024<0.0010.639
Moral self-acceptance37.8726.09332.9186.5054.969<0.0010.786
Physical attractiveness27.8727.99222.5277.4674.347<0.0010.691
Vitality29.8257.65424.1218.2724.469<0.0010.715
Identity integration29.6277.66924.4596.8294.527<0.0010.711
Defensive high self-esteem48.3378.38545.1357.2622.5610.0110.408

Family functioning and dimensions of self-esteem in the control group (without an increased risk for ED) and the study group (wih an increased risk for ED).

∗p < 0.05;∗∗p < 0.01; Family functioning (APGAR); global self-esteem, competence, lovability, likeability, personal power, self-control, moral self-acceptance, physical attractiveness, vitality, identity integration, and defensive high self-esteem (MSEI).

The results of the analysis conducted using Student t-test for independent samples show that there are statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of increased risk for ED, FF and all of the components of self-esteem. In most cases, the strength of the effect measured with d Cohen is moderate in magnitude. Only in the case of defensive high self-esteem, the strength was found to be low. However, in the case of global self-esteem, the effect size was large. Individuals without an increased risk for ED are characterized by a more positive FF and higher self-esteem in all dimensions.

We also used an analysis of covariance to control for differences in EDs based on gender, age, and working/studying variables, as they resulted in differences between both groups (study vs. control). The results of the Levene’s test of equality of error variances indicated that the assumptions of homogeneity of variances were met (p = 0.472). The results show that age and working/studying were not significant covariates [F(1, 159) = 1.769; p = 0.186; partial eta squared = 0.012 for age; F(1, 159) = 2.344; p = 0.128; partial eta squared = 0.016 for working/studying]. Instead, gender was a significant covariate F(1, 159) = 8.948; p = 0.003; partial eta squared = 0.058.

The next step was to verify the relationship between an increased risk for ED, FF and dimensions of self-esteem (hypothesis 3). Pearson’s r correlation (Table 2) shows a negative correlation between all of the dimensions of self-esteem and an increased risk for ED and a positive correlation between the dimensions of self-esteem and FF.

Table 2

Dimension of self-esteemEating disordersFamily functioning
Global self-esteem-0.402∗∗0.413∗∗
Competence-0.333∗∗0.276∗∗
Lovability-0.343∗∗0.684∗∗
Likeability-0.327∗∗0.462∗∗
Personal power-0.294∗∗0.171∗
Self-control-0.305∗∗0.419∗∗
Moral self-acceptance-0.368∗∗0.381∗∗
Physical attractiveness-0.327∗∗0.400∗∗
Vitality-0.339∗∗0.430∗∗
Identity integration-0.335∗∗0.304∗∗
Defensive high self-esteem-0.200∗∗0.250∗∗

Correlation between an increased risk for ED, FF, and dimensions of self-esteem.

∗p < 0.05;∗∗p < 0.01; family functioning (APGAR); eating disorders (SCOFF); global self-esteem, competence, lovability, likeability, personal power, self-control, moral self-acceptance, physical attractiveness, vitality, identity integration, and defensive high self-esteem (MSEI).

In order to detect multicollinearity (Kim et al., 2007), the regression model was tested because of correlations among all of the dimensions of self-esteem. In both groups (a low-risk for ED, and an increased risk for ED), tolerance values ranged from 0.350 to 0.839 and the variance inflation factor (VIF) values ranged from 1.192 to 2.881, respectively, suggesting that multicollinearity was unlikely to be an issue in our study.

In the subsequent part of the analyses, dimensions of self-esteem were introduced as potential mediators which could weaken, strengthen or have no influence on the existing correlation between the independent variable (FF) and the dependent variable (an increased risk for EDs) (Figure 1).

The PROCESS macro shows (Table 3) that the c path (the direct effect) decreased after the introduction of 10 out of 11 mediators and became insignificant (c’ path). On the basis of the obtained results, it can be stated that global self-esteem, competence, lovability, likeability, personal power, self-control, moral self-acceptance, physical attractiveness, vitality, and identity integration mediate the relationship between FF and an increased risk for EDs. Defensive high self-esteem did not mediate the relationship between FF and increased risk for EDs, as evidenced by confidence interval for the indirect effect that contained zero (mediation model 11): 95% CI [-0.0387, 0.0025].

Table 3

a Pathb Pathc Pathc’ PathIndirect effectB(SE)lower CIUpper CI
1. FF – GS – ED1.11∗∗∗-0.07∗∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.02 (ni)-0.08170.0211-0.1263-0.0434
2. FF – CO – ED0.64∗∗∗-0.04∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.07 (ni)-0.03190.0144-0.0628-0.0073
3. FF – LO – ED1.94∗∗∗-0.07∗∗∗-0.10∗∗0.04 (ni)-0.14790.0354-0.2173-0.0766
4. FF – LI – ED1.07∗∗∗-0.06∗∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.03 (ni)-0.07190.0214-0.1167-0.0333
5. FF – PP – ED0.38∗-0.05∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.08 (ni)-0.02130.0127-0.0499-0.0010
6. FF – SC – ED0.93∗∗∗-0.05∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.05 (ni)-0.05300.0184-0.0893-0.0171
7. FF – MS – ED0.85∗∗∗-0.07∗∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.04 (ni)-0.06260.0194-0.1026-0.0276
8. FF – PA – ED1.08∗∗∗-0.05∗∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.04 (ni)-0.05990.0205-0.1020-0.0229
9. FF – VI – ED1.20∗∗∗-0.04∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.05 (ni)-0.05160.0199-0.0947-0.0158
10. FF – II – ED0.78∗∗∗-0.05∗∗∗-0.10∗∗-0.06 (ni)-0.04000.0150-0.0727-0.0142
11. FF – DH – ED0.66∗∗-0.01-0.10∗∗-0.09 (sig)-0.01510.0106-0.03870.0025

The role of global self-esteem and its dimensions in the relationship between FF and an increased risk for EDs.

∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ni – non-significant; sig – significant; FF, Family functioning; ED, Eating disorder; GS, General self-esteem; CO, Competence; LO, Lovability; LI, Likeability; PP, Personal power; SC, Self-control; MS, Moral self-acceptance; PA, Physical attractiveness; VI, Vitality; II, Identity integration; DH, Defensive high self-esteem.

All of the cases presented above (Table 3) reveal that FF is indirectly associated with an increased risk for EDs through self-esteem dimensions: general feeling of self-confidence, belief in one’s ability to perform new tasks competently, certainty of being loved and taken care of, feeling accepted by peers, feeling powerful and assertive, being self-disciplined and persevering, satisfaction with moral values and acting in accordance with them, feeling attractive to others, enjoyment of physical activities, and having a clear sense of identity and cohesion.

Respect to sex as a potentially confounding variable, it did not make a significant contribution to the model as a change in the regression coefficient was very small between measurement with (R2 = 0.459) and without sex (R2 = 0.429). However, in different equations and with different sets of independent or confounding variables this outcome could potentially change.

Discussion

As has been assumed in hypothesis No 1 and 2, it was found that persons with no risk of EDs are characterized by a more positive assessment of FF and a higher level of self-esteem in all its dimensions as compared with individuals at risk of EDs. Such results are in line with the majority of the outcomes given in the literature on the subject which show that patients with EDs seem to hold more maladaptive core beliefs than their low-risk counterparts (Dingemans et al., 2006; Cerniglia et al., 2017). For example, Blodgett Salafia et al. (2015) present results supporting differences in the perception of various life domains between individuals with and without EDs. Those participants who were at risk of an ED tended, to a greater extent than those without an ED, to associate their low self-esteem with a bad relationship or social problems, listed traumatic life events as related to the beginning of their disorder, and mentioned poor body image as a foundation for the development of the ED. Other studies (Dingemans et al., 2006) demonstrate that ED patients have less functional thinking patterns related not only to diet, eating, weight or shape, but associated with their environment, including close family and friend relationships. Such maladaptive schemas often develop as a result of interpretation of present situations, memories from the past experience, or convictions about the future (Jones et al., 2007), resulting in less constructive behaviors, perceptions of the world and themselves, feelings, and interactions (Young et al., 2003). Among the main areas of dysfunctional cognitions of persons with diagnosed EDs, researchers (Legenbauer et al., 2018) mention negative thoughts about the persons’ own body and self-esteem.

The third hypothesis was also confirmed, showing a negative correlation between all dimensions of self-esteem and an increased risk for ED, and a positive correlation between dimensions of self-esteem and FF. While on the one hand parenting is associated with self-esteem and satisfaction, on the other hand, parental styles may also be related to abnormal attitudes (Liu et al., 2018). Researchers point to the negative traits of a family system (overprotectiveness, difficulties with resolving disagreements and problematic situations, distance between family members or an atmosphere of tension or misunderstanding) as associated with EDs (Namysłowska et al., 2000). The family environment may be reflected in the self-esteem of an individual suffering from an ED – most often it is unrealistic, low and strongly influenced by a feeling of guilt for experienced misfortune (Ziółkowska, 2005).

Verification of the proposed hypothesis No 4 seems to indicate that global self-esteem, competence, lovability, likeability, personal power, self-control, moral self-acceptance, physical attractiveness, vitality, and identity integration mediate the relationship between FF and EDs. The presence of self-esteem mediators explains why the negative assessment of the functioning of the family of origin does not necessarily translate into the development of EDs.

The obtained outcomes are in line with the results of some recent clinical analyses. Dissatisfaction or self-doubt can be a manifestation of a negative perception of oneself, thus constituting a high-risk factor of an unhealthy weight loss or the development and persistence of an ED (Noordenbos et al., 2014). Pelletier Brochu et al. (2018) report that low self-esteem and negative mood act as mediators of the level of perceived alienation in the relationship with an individual’s mother and ED symptom severity. The contrary situation is observed among individuals with a higher level of self-worth who tend to adopt a more positive attitude to events from the past and perceive the future as having a possibility for success, including overcoming an ED (Garcia et al., 2017).

In regard to competence as a mediator between FF and EDs, the previous research shows some similar outcomes. For example, self-competence seems to play a role in bulimic behavior. The findings (Gordon et al., 2005) suggest that middle-aged and older women who display low levels of self-competence and feelings of ineffectiveness tend to be more vulnerable to bulimic symptom development rather than assuming adaptive behaviors of weight loss. The reason for such choices may stem from their disbelief in their ability to change body weight in healthy way. Other researchers (Bardone et al., 2003) provide empirical support that self-competence is more predictive of the change in EDs over time.

Another significant mediating factor is the belief of being loved, even if such a belief stems not from the relationship with family members but from other people. According to Stice and Whitenton (2002), individuals at increased risk for EDs tend to feel a lack of unconditional support and emotional closeness from family members and friends, which predispose them to form a negative body image. Persons with an ED struggle to please others and, at the same time, to win their affection (Brown and Geller, 2006). In fact, Williams and Reid (2012), using an interpretative phenomenological analysis, report some evidence obtained from participant with EDs who wanted to recover from their disorder. One of the girls believed that she needed to be perfect, polite, and put others first to be liked and loved. Another young woman defined anorexia as an inner, constant, and controlling voice which criticizes who you are and what you do, reminding you that you are worthless and unloved. Still, another participant recognized that the conviction of being loved by other people motivated her to start defeating her disease. Such an admission shows that being aware of receiving affection can greatly increase the chances for successfully overcoming the disorder, as a person who feels loved manifests greater emotional strength and is less likely to suffer from depression.

With respect to personal power and self-control as mediators between FF and EDs, preliminary findings (Bandini et al., 2013) illustrate that low assertiveness can maintain symptoms and aggravate the outcome in patients with EDs. Other studies (Williams et al., 1990, 1993) show that ED individuals, contrary to normal controls and individuals who display dietary features, report significantly less self-assertion and more external control, thus supporting the anecdotal contentions that both low self-esteem and low assertiveness are traits of AN and BN patients. As both personal power and self-control denote a person’s ability to override and constrain socially intolerable and undesirable impulses and to modify and regulate one’s behavior (Finkenauer et al., 2005), such capacities may help in altering EDs. Lu et al. (2015) confirm that self-control serves as a mediator between parental overprotection and EDs.

Moral self-approval, which refers to satisfaction with the individual’s values and moral standards, is the next important mediating factor between FF and EDs. Similar results are presented by Collin et al. (2016) who found that moral self-approval is predictive of magnitude of change in the dimensions of an eating psychopathology, precisely of AN. Moreover, other outcomes show (Mulkerrin et al., 2016; Masuda et al., 2018) that individuals at increased risk for EDs, contrary to their low-risk counterparts, often experience difficulty in recognizing and refining their personal values. They tent to live with their values and principles in an extreme or incongruent way, assuming rigid, inflexible attitudes about some aspects of their lives (e.g.: own weight, appearance, dietery restrictions) or compromising interpersonal values of close family relationships and friendships by choices arising from EDs. Such unhelpful beliefs and inappropriate practices may be challenged and modified through psychological treatments, giving them a chance to defeat the desease.

The importance of feeling physically attractive in the development of EDs is reflected not only in the mediating role gained in the present study, but also by the results obtained previously (Davis et al., 2000; Patzer, 2006; Vartanian et al., 2018). Studies worldwide (Davis et al., 2000; Józefik and Pilecki, 2010) have found that exaggerating the value of appearance can trigger excessive concern for one’s own image, thus leading to unhealthy weight loss and, consequently, to the development of an ED. In fact, Goñi and Rodríguez (2007) highlight that the feeling of dissatisfaction with one’s body image may be one of the most significant predictors of EDs as a distorted body image often relates to a low physical self-concept. In analyses that have utilized multi-dimensional self-esteem instruments (O’Dea, 2006), a number of explicit domains of self-worth have been found to be negatively associated with body weight (e.g.: physical appearance and attractiveness, athletic competence).

Vitality known as the sense of being in good physical shape and being physically active, can have a positive impact on the negative correlation between the assessment of FF and EDs. When a person’s vitality is strong, it can serve as a major motivating factor for coping with difficult family situation and possible problems resulting from the disorder. The studies (Johnson and Wardle, 2005) show that people who are dissatisfied with their body image and are in poor physical shape are at an increased risk for EDs, both anorexia and bulimia. The negative emotions experienced by a person with low self-esteem can lead to an increased risk of a distorted body image (Reboussin et al., 2000), which in turn results in taking deliberate action aimed at ongoing weight loss and all its physical consequences.

Finally, identity integration appears to be another essential factor related to EDs. This result is in line with other previous studies. For example, Fairburn and Harrison (2003) hold that individuals with EDs are inclined to overvalue their body shape and/or weight. Moreover, Stanghellini et al. (2012) consider that the different types of irregularities characterizing persons with an increased risk of EDs are consequences of their personal identity.

The present research extends our knowledge about the mediatory role of self-esteem and its dimensions between FF and EDs, explains why only some individuals with a negative assessment of the relationships in their family of origin may display EDs, and offers some conclusions that have potential clinical implications. However, the present investigation also has some limitations. As the current analyses were based on a subset of the small group of participants and had a cross-sectional character, it is impossible to establish causal relationships between variables, and the analyses should be considered cautiously without generalization. In fact, mediation with cross-sectional data does not tell us to what extent the association between self-esteem and EDs reflected an actual effect of the self-esteem on ED symptoms, and to what extent the associations resulted from those with lower-risk EDs being more confident and satisfied with the self. Furthermore, the constructs of FF, self-esteem, and EDs were measured through self-reports and, in the case of FF, were formed on retrospective data referring to the individual’s childhood. Although some studies demonstrate encouraging levels of consistency between retroactive and contemporaneous narratives (Brown, 2014), the accuracy of retrospective reports is sometimes considered problematic because of potential memory bias and, consequently, is believed to not always be sufficiently valid (Naicker et al., 2017; Bell and Bell, 2018). Moreover, it could be argued that the family system across the sample varied widely given that some individuals in the upper age bracket were in middle adulthood and might be parents themselves, whereas individuals in the younger bracket were entering adulthood and did not have experience of parenthood. As such, the results underscore the importance of future studies related to better comprehension of the mediatory role of self-esteem through a longitudinal and experimental approach.

Conclusion

  • (1)

    It is important to identify the specific features of the family system as they might constitute significant psychosocial factors associated with EDs.

  • (2)

    Apart from FF, dimensions of self-esteem need to be considered in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures according to their determined mediating role.

  • (3)

    EDs among individuals with a negative assessment of FF can be reduced when an individual is satisfied with oneself, has the ability to master new tasks, recognizes the affection received from others, not necessarily the family members, is assertive and persistent, has an established value hierarchy, finds some attractiveness and vitality in themselves, and has their own internal integrity.

Statements

Ethics statement

In order to protect confidentiality of participants, this research was conducted following the APA Ethics Code Standard 3.08. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Department of Psychology (KB 3/2018), Szczecin University. The respondents were assured of confidentiality of information and gave informed and written consent for their participation in the study.

Author contributions

ZK contributed to the ideation of the review, to the search of literature, and wrote the manuscript. MS conducted the statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript. JF contributed to the search of literature, wrote parts of the manuscript and summarized it. AG contributed to the ideation of the review, collected data, and wrote parts of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AkobengA. K. (2007). Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves.Acta Paediatr.95644–647. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00178.x

  • 2

    AllenK. L.GibsonL. Y.McLeanN. J.DavisE. A.ByrneS. M. (2014). Maternal and family factors and child eating pathology: risk and protective relationships.J. Eat. Disord.2:11. 10.1186/2050-2974-2-11

  • 3

    AllisonK. C.GriloC. M.MashebR. M.StunkardA. J. (2005). Binge eating disorder and night eating syndrome: a comparative study of disordered eating.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.731107–1115. 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1107

  • 4

    AmiantoF.NorthoffG.Abbate DagaG.FassinoS.TascaG. A. (2016). Is anorexia nervosa a disorder of the self? A psychological approach.Front. Psychol.7:849. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00849

  • 5

    AttiliG.Di PentimaL.MagnaniM. (2004). Disturbi del comportamento alimentare, modelli mentali dell’attaccamento e relazioni familiari.Psicol. Clin. Sviluppo869–96. 10.1449/13174

  • 6

    BalottinL.MannariniS.MensiM. M.ChiappediM.GattaM. (2017). Triadic interactions in families of adolescents with anorexia nervosa and families of adolescents with internalizing disorders.Front. Psychol.7:2046. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02046

  • 7

    BandiniL.SighinolfiC.MenchettiM.MorriM.De RonchiD.AttiA. R. (2013). Assertiveness and eating disorders: the efficacy of a CBT group training. Preliminary findings.Eur. Psychiatry.28:1. 10.1016/S0924-9338(13)76215-1

  • 8

    BarcacciaB.BalestriniV.SalianiA. M.BaioccoR.ManciniF.SchneiderB. H. (2018). Dysfunctional eating behaviors, anxiety, and depression in Italian boys and girls: the role of mass media.Braz. J. Psiquiatr.4072–77. 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2200

  • 9

    BardoneA. M.PerezM.AbramsonL. Y.JoinerT. E. (2003). Self-competence and self-liking in the prediction of change in bulimic symptoms.Int. J. Eat. Disord.34361–369. 10.1002/eat.10197

  • 10

    BardoneA. M.VohsK. D.AbramsonL. Y.HeathertonT. F.JoinerT. E. (2000). The confluence of perfectionism, body dissatisfaction, and low self-esteem predicts bulimic symptoms: clinical implications.Behav. Ther.31265–280. 10.1016/S0005-7894(00)80015-5

  • 11

    BarnhillJ. W.TaylorN. (2001). Zaburzenia Odżywiania [Eating Disorders]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Pruszyński i Spółka.

  • 12

    BellD. C.BellL. G. (2018). Accuracy of retrospective reports of family environment.J. Child Fam. Stud.271029–1040. 10.1007/s10826-017-0948-5

  • 13

    Blodgett SalafiaE. H.JonesM. E.HaugenE. C.SchaeferM. K. (2015). Perceptions of the causes of eating disorders: a comparison of individuals with and without eating disorders.J. Eat. Disord.3:32. 10.1186/s40337-015-0069-8

  • 14

    Blodgett SalafiaE. H.SchaeferM. K.HaugenE. C. (2014). Connections between marital conflict and adolescent girls’ disordered eating: parent-adolescent relationship quality as a mediator.J. Child Fam. Stud.231128–1138. 10.1007/s10826-013-9771-9

  • 15

    BrownK.GellerJ. (2006). Supporting friends and family members with eating disorders: discrepancies between intentions and reality.Eat. Disord.14215–228. 10.1080/10640260600638915

  • 16

    BrownM. (2014). Assessing recall of early life circumstances: evidence from the national child development study.Long. Life Course Stud.564–78. 10.14301/llcs.v5i1.232

  • 17

    BurneyJ.IrwinH. J. (2000). Shame and guilt in women with eating disorder symptomatology.J. Clin. Psychol.5651–61. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200001)56:13.0.CO;2-W

  • 18

    CalamR.WallerG. (1998). Are eating and psychological characteristics in early teenage years useful predictors of eating characteristics in early adulthood? A 7-year longitudinal study.Int. J. Eat. Disord.24351–362. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199812)24:4<351

  • 19

    CanalsJ.SanchoC.ArijaM. V. (2009). Influence of parent’s eating attitudes on eating disorders in school adolescents.Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry18353–359. 10.1007/s00787-009-0737-9

  • 20

    CernigliaL.CiminoS.TafàM.MarzilliG.BallarottoG.BracagliaF. (2017). Family profiles in eating disorders: family functioning and psychoapthology. 10305–312. 10.2147/PRBM.S145463

  • 21

    ChopikW. J.EdelsteinR. S.FraleyR. C. (2013). From the cradle to the grave: age differences in attachment from early adulthood to old age.J. Pers.81171–183. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00793.x

  • 22

    CollinP.KaratziasT.PowerK.HowardR.GriersonD.YellowleesA. (2016). Multi-dimensional self-esteem and magnitude of change in the treatment of anorexia nervosa.Psychiatry Res.237175–181. 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.046

  • 23

    CooperM.HuntJ. (1998). Core beliefs and underlying assumptions in bulimia nervosa and depression.Behav. Res. Ther.36895–898. 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00068-0

  • 24

    DadaG.IzuS.MontebrunoC.GrauA.FeixasG. (2017). Content analysis of the construction of self and others in women with bulimia nervosa.Front. Psychol.8:480. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00480

  • 25

    DakanalisA.TimkoC. A.ColmegnaF.RivaG.ClericiM. (2018). Evaluation of the DSM-5 severity ratings for anorexia nervosa in a clinical sample.Psychiatry Res.262124–128. 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.009

  • 26

    Dalle GraveR. (2013). Multistep Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Eating Disorders: Theory, Practise, and Clinical Cases.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield

  • 27

    DavisC.ClaridgeG.FoxJ. (2000). Not just a pretty face: physical attractiveness and perfectionism in the risk for eating disorders.Int. J. Eat. Disord.2767–73. 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(200001)27:1<67::aid-eat7>3.0.co;2-f

  • 28

    de JongM.SchoorlM.HoekH. W. (2018). Enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with eating disorders: a systematic review.Curr. Opin. Psychiatry31436–444. 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000452

  • 29

    DeJongH.OldershawA.AternheimL.SamarawickremaN.KenyonM. D.BroadbentH.et al (2013). Quality of life in anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and eating disorder not-otherwise-specified.J. Eat. Disord.1:43. 10.1186/2050-2974-1-43

  • 30

    DenisoffE.EndlerN. S. (2000). Life experience, coping, and weight preoccupation in young adult women.Can. J. Behav. Sci.3297–103. 10.1037/h0087483

  • 31

    DiehlM.ElnickA. B.BourbeauL. S.Labouvie-ViefG. (1998). Adult attachment styles: their relations to family context and personality.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.741656–1669. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1656

  • 32

    DingemansA. E.SpinhovenP.van FurthE. F. (2006). Maladaptive core beliefs and eating disorder symptoms.Eat. Behav.7258–265. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2005.09.007

  • 33

    DuffyM. E.HenkelK. E. (2016). Non-specific terminology: moderating shame and guilt in eating disorders.Eat. Disord.24161–172. 10.1080/10640266.2015.1027120

  • 34

    EddyK. T.TabriN.ThomasJ. J.MurrayH. B.KeshaviahA.HastingsE.et al (2017). Recovery from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa at 22-year follow-up.J. Clin. Psychiatry78184–189. 10.4088/JCP.15m10393

  • 35

    EganS. J.WatsonH. J.KaneR. T.McEvoyP.FurslandA.NathanP. R. (2013). Anxiety as a mediator between perfectionism and eating disorders.Cogn. Ther. Res.37905–913. 10.1007/s10608-012-9516-x

  • 36

    EggertJ.LevendoskyA.KlumpK. (2007). Relationships among attachment styles, personality characteristics, and disordered eating.Int. J. Eat. Disord.40149–155. 10.1002/eat.20351

  • 37

    ErolA.YaziciF.ToprakG. (2007). Family functioning of patients with an eating disorder compared with that of patients with obsessive compulsive disorder.Compr. Psychiatry4847–50. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.05.004

  • 38

    EyalK.Te’eni-HarariT. (2013). Explaining the relationship between media exposure and early adolescents’ body image perceptions: the role of favorite characters.J. Media Psychol.25129–141. 10.1027/1864-1105/a000094

  • 39

    FairburnC. G. (2008). “Eating disorders: the transdiagnostic view and the cognitive behavioural theory,” in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and Eating Disorders, ed.FairburnC. G. (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 7–23.

  • 40

    FairburnC. G.CooperZ.ShafranR.BohnK.HawkerD. (2008). “Clinical perfectionism, core low self-esteem and interpersonal problems,” in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and Eating Disorders, ed.FairburnC. G. (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 197–220.

  • 41

    FairburnC. G.HarrisonP. J. (2003). Eating disorders.Lancet361407–417. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12378-1

  • 42

    FarstadS. M.McGeownL.von RansonK. M. (2016). Eating disorders and personality, 2004-2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin. Psychol. Rev.4691–105. 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.005

  • 43

    FeixasG.MontebrunoC.DadaG.del CastilloM.CompañV. (2010). Self-construction, cognitive conflicts and polarization in bulimia nervosa.Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol.10445–457.

  • 44

    FergusonC. J. (2018). The devil wears stata: thin-ideal media’s minimal contribution to our understanding of body dissatisfaction and eating disorders.Arch. Sci. Psychol.670–79. 10.1037/arc0000044

  • 45

    FinkenauerC.EngelsR. C. M. E.BaumeisterR. F. (2005). Parenting behaviour and adolescent behavioural and emotional problems: the role of self-control.Int. J. Behav. Dev.2958–69. 10.1080/01650250444000333

  • 46

    Forsén MantillaE.ClintonD.BirgegardA. (2017). Insidious: the relationship patients have with their eating disorders and its impact on symptoms, duration of illness, and self-image.Psychol. Psychother.91302–316. 10.1111/papt.12161

  • 47

    FrankoD. L.ThompsonD.BausermanR.AffenitoA. G.Striegel-MooreR. H. (2008). What’s love got to do with it? Family cohesion and healthy eating behaviors in adolescent girls.Int. J. Eat. Disord.41360–367. 10.1002/eat.20517

  • 48

    GarciaD.GranjardA.LundjardS.ArcherT. (2017). A dark past, a restraint present, and an apocalyptic future: time perspective, personality, and life satisfaction among anorexia nervosa patients.PeerJ5:e3801. 10.7717/peerj.3801

  • 49

    GeliebterA. (2002). New developments in binge eating disorder and the night eating syndrome.Appetite39175–177. 10.1006/appe.2001.0472

  • 50

    GellerJ.CockellS. J.HewittP. L.GoldnerE. M.FlettG. L. (2000). Inhibited expressions of negative emotions and interpersonal orientation in anorexia nervosa.Int. J. Eat. Disord.288–19. 10.1002/1098-108X(200007)28:13.0.CO;2-U

  • 51

    GianiniL.RobertoC. A.AttiaE.WalshT.ThomasJ. J.EddyK. T.et al (2017). Mild, moderate, meaningful? Examining the psychological and functioning correlates of DSM-5 eating disorder severity specifiers.Int. J. Eat. Disord.50906–916. 10.1002/eat.22728

  • 52

    GilaA.CastroJ.GómezM. J.ToroJ. (2005). Social and body self-esteem in adolescents with eating disorders.Rev. Int. Psicol. Ter. Psicol.163–71.

  • 53

    GonçalvesS.MachadoB. C.MartinsC.HoekH. W.MachadoP. P. P. (2016). Retrospective correlates for bulimia nervosa: a matched case-control study.Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev.24197–205. 10.1002/erv.2434

  • 54

    GoñiA.RodríguezA. (2007). Variables associated with the risk of eating disorders in adolescence.Salud Ment.3016–23.

  • 55

    GordonK. H.DenomaJ. M.BardoneA. M.AbramsonL. Y.JoinerT. E.Jr. (2005). Self-competence and the prediction of bulimic symptoms in older women.Behav. Ther.36169–175. 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80065-6

  • 56

    GouveiaM. J.CanavarroM. C.MoreiraH. (2018). Is mindful parenting associated with adolescents’ emotional eating? The mediating role of adolescents’ self-compassion and body shame.Front. Psychol.9:2004. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02004

  • 57

    GriffithsS.CastleD.CunninghamM.MurrayS. B.BastianB.BarlowF. K. (2018). How does exposure to thinspiration and fitspiration relate to symptom severity among individuals with eating disorders? Evaluation of a proposed model.Body Imag.27187–195. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.10.002

  • 58

    GriloC. M. (2013). Why no cognitive body image feature such as overvaluation of shape/weight in the binge eating disorder diagnosis?Int. J. Eat. Disord.46208–211. 10.1002/eat.22082

  • 59

    HaiS.WangH.CaoL.ZhouJ.YangY.DongB. (2017). Association between sarcopenia with lifestyle and family function among community-dwelling Chinese aged 60 years and older.BMC Geriatr.17:187. 10.1186/s12877-017-0587-0

  • 60

    HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach.New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • 61

    HaynosA. F.HallL. M. J.LavenderJ. M.PetersonC. B.CrowS. J.Klimes-DouganB.et al (2018). Resting state functional connectivity of networks associated with reward and habit in anorexia nervosa.Hum. Brain Mapp.11–11. 10.1002/hbm.24402

  • 62

    HebebrandJ.CasperR.TreasureJ.ScheigerU. (2004). The need to revise the diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa.J. Neural Transm.111827–840. 10.1007/s00702-004-0136-9

  • 63

    HilbertA.de ZwaanM.BraehlerE. (2012). How frequent are eating disturbances in the population? Norms of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire.PLoS One7:e29125. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029125

  • 64

    Holtom-VieselA.AllanS. (2014). A systematic review of the literature on family functioning across all eating disorder diagnoses in comparison to control families.Clin. Psychol. Rev.3429–43. 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.005

  • 65

    HooleyJ. M.GotlibI. H. (2000). A diathesis-stress conceptualization of expressed emotion and clinical outcome.App. Prev. Psychol.9135–151. 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80001-0

  • 66

    JohnsonF.WardleJ. (2005). Dietary restraint, body dissatisfaction, and psychological distress: a prospective analysis.J. Abnorm. Psychol.114119–125. 10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.119

  • 67

    JohnstonJ.ShuC. Y.HoilesK. J.ClarkeP. J. F.WatsonH. J.DunlopP. D. D.et al (2018). Perfectionism is associated with higher eating disorder symptoms and lower remission in children and adolescents diagnosed with eating disorders.Eat. Behav.3055–60. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.05.008

  • 68

    JoinerT. E.HeathertonT. F.RuddM. D.SchmidtN. B. (1997). Perfectionism, perceived weight status, and bulimic symptoms: two studies testing a diathesis-stress model.J. Abnorm. Psychol.106145–153. 10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.145

  • 69

    JonesC.LeungN.HarrisG. (2007). Dysfunctional core beliefs in eating disorders: a review.J. Cogn. Psychother.21156–171. 10.1891/088983907780851531

  • 70

    JózefikB.PileckiM. W. (2010). Perception of autonomy and intimacy in families of origin of parents of patients with eating disorders, of parents of depressed patients and of parents of healthy controls. A transgenerational perspective – Part II.Arch. Psychiatr. Psychother.1279–86.

  • 71

    KeelP. K.KlumpK. L. (2003). Are eating disorders culture-bound syndromes? Implications for conceptualizing their etiology.Psychol. Bull.129747–769. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.747

  • 72

    KeeryH.EisenbergM. E.BoutelleK.Neumark-SztainerD.StoryM. (2006). Relationships between maternal and adolescent weight-related behaviors and concerns: the role of perception.J. Psychosom. Res.61105–111. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.01.011

  • 73

    KeithL.GillandersD.SimpsonS. (2009). An exploration of the main sources of shame in an eating-disordered population.Clin. Psychol. Psychother.16317–327. 10.1002/cpp.629

  • 74

    KennedyP.RooneyR. M.KaneR. T.HassanS.NesaM. (2015). The enhanced aussie optimism positive thinking skills program: the relationship between internalizing symptoms and family functioning in children aged 9-11 years old.Front. Psychol.6:504. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00504

  • 75

    KimH. W.ChanH. C.GuptaS. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation.Decis. Support Syst.43111–126. 10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009

  • 76

    KoC. H.WangP. W.LiuT. L.YenC. F.ChenC. S.YenJ. Y. (2015). Bidirectional associations between family factors and Internet addiction among adolescents in a prospective investigation.Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci.69192–200. 10.1111/pcn.12204

  • 77

    KonrathS. H.ChopikW. J.HsingC. K.O’BrienE. (2014). Changes in adult attachment styles in American college students over time: a meta-analysis.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev.18326–348. 10.1177/1088868314530516

  • 78

    KorotanaL. M.von RansonK. M.WilsonS.IaconoW. G. (2018). Reciprocal associations between eating pathology and parent-daughter relationships across adolescence: a monozygotic twin differences study.Front. Psychol.9:914. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00914

  • 79

    ŁagunaM.Lachowicz-TabaczekK.DzwonkowskaI. (2007). Skala samooceny SES Morrisa Rosenberga – Polska adaptacja metody.Psychol. Społ.202164–176.

  • 80

    LatzerY.LaveeY.GalS. (2009). Marital and parent-child relationships in families with daughters who have eating disorders.J. Fam. Issues301201–1220. 10.1177/0192513X09334599

  • 81

    LavenderY. M.De YoungK. P.FrankoD. L.EddyK. T.KassA. E.SearsM. S.et al (2011). An investigation of the joint longitudinal trajectories of low body weight, binge eating, and purging in women with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.Int. J. Eat. Disord.44679–686. 10.1002/eat.20880

  • 82

    Le GrangeD.LockJ.LoebK.NichollsD. (2010). Academy for eating disorders position paper: the role of the family in eating disorders.Int. J. Eat. Disord.431–5. 10.1002/eat.20751

  • 83

    Le GrangeD.O’ConnorM.HughesE. K.MacdonaldJ.LittleK.OlssonC. A. (2014). Developmental antecedents of abnormal eating attitudes and behaviors in adolescence.Int. J. Eat. Disord.47813–824. 10.1002/eat.22331

  • 84

    LearyM. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: getting to the root of self-esteem.Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol.1675–111. 10.1080/10463280540000007

  • 85

    LegenbauerT.RadixA. K.AugustatN.Schütt-StrömelS. (2018). Power of cognition: how dysfunctional cognitions and schemas influence eating behaviour in daily life among individuals with eating disorders.Front. Psychol.9:2138. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02138

  • 86

    LeonidasC.Dos SantosM. A. (2017). Emotional meanings assigned to eating disorders: narratives of women with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.Univ. Psychol.161–13. 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-4.emae

  • 87

    LeysC.KotsouI.GoemanneM.FossionP. (2017). The influence of family dynamics on eating disorders and their consequence on resilience: a mediation model.Am. J. Fam. Ther.45123–132. 10.1080/01926187.2017.1303654

  • 88

    LiuD.KsinanA. J.VazsonyiA. T. (2018). Maternal support and deviance among rural adolescents: the mediating role of self-esteem.J. Adolesc.2262–71. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.09.003

  • 89

    LoxtonN. J.DaweS. (2009). “Personality and eating disorders,” in Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology, edsCorrP. J.MatthewsG. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 687–703.

  • 90

    LuY.Jin-hoH. E.HongZ. H. U.Si-yaoW. U.Tai-shengC. A. I.XianH. U.et al (2015). Effect of parenting styles on eating disorders in teenagers: mediating role of self-control.Chin. J. Clin. Psychol.23473–476.

  • 91

    MachadoP. P. P.GriloC. M.CrosbyR. D. (2017). Evaluation of the DSM-5 severity indicator for anorexia nervosa: DSM-5 anorexia nervosa severity indicator.Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev.25221–223. 10.1002/erv.2508

  • 92

    Mangweth-MatzekB.RuppC. I.HausmannA.AssmayrK.MariacherE.KemmlerG.et al (2006). Never too old for eating disorders or body dissatisfaction: a community study of elderly women.Int. J. Eat. Disord.39583–586. 10.1002/eat.20327

  • 93

    Martyn-NemethP.PenckoferS.GulanickM.Velsor-FriedrichBryantF. B. (2009). The relationships among self-esteem, stress, coping, eating behaviour, and depressive mood in adolescents.Res. Nurs. Health3296–109. 10.1002/nur.20304

  • 94

    MasudaA.MarshallR. D.LatnerJ. D. (2018). Mindfullness as a moderator of the association between eating disorder cognition and eating disorder behaviour among non-clinical sample of female college students: a role of ethnicity.Front. Psychol.9:700. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00700

  • 95

    MayhewA. J.PigeyreM.CouturierJ.MeyreD. (2017). An evolutionary genetic perspective of eating disorders.Neuroendocrinology106292–306. 10.1159/000484525

  • 96

    MazzeoS. E.EspelageD. L. (2002). Association between childhood physical and emotional abuse and disordered eating behaviors in female undergraduates: an investigation of the mediating role of alexitymia and depression.J. Couns. Psychol.4986–100. 10.1037/0022-0167.49.1.86

  • 97

    McAdamsC. J.Jeon-SlaughterH.EvansS.LohrenzT.MontagueP. R.KrawczykD. C. (2016). Neural differences in self-perception during illness and after weight-recovery in anorexia nervosa.Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.111823–1831. 10.1093/scan/nsw092

  • 98

    McAdamsC. J.SmithW. (2015). Neural correlates of eating disorders: translational potential.Neurosci. Neuroecon.435–49. 10.2147/NAN.S76699

  • 99

    McClellanC. B.CohenL. L. (2007). Family functioning in children with chronic illness compared with healthy controls: a critical review.J. Pediatr.150221–223. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.11.063

  • 100

    MillerM. N.PumariegaA. (2001). Culture and eating disorders: a historical and cross-cultural review.Psychiatry6493–110. 10.1521/psyc.64.2.93.18621

  • 101

    MitchisonD.HayP. J. (2014). The epidemiology of eating disorders: genetic, environmental, and societal factors.Clin. Epidemiol.689–97. 10.2147/CLEP.S40841

  • 102

    MontebarocciO.CodispotiM.SurcinelliP.FranzoniB.BaldaroB.RossiN. (2006). Alexithymia in female patients with eating disorders.Eat. Weight Disord.1114–21. 10.1007/BF03327739

  • 103

    MorganJ. F.ReidF.LaceyJ. H. (1999). The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders.BMJ3191467–1478.

  • 104

    MorganJ. F.ReidF.LaceyJ. H. (2000). The SCOFF questionnaire: a new screening tool for eating disorders.West. J. Med.172164–165. 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467

  • 105

    MulkerrinÚ.BamfordB.SerpellL. (2016). How well does anorexia nervosa fit with personal values? An exploratory study.J. Eat. Disord.4:20. 10.1186/s40337-016-0109-z

  • 106

    MünchA. L.HungerC.SchweitzerJ. (2016). An investigation of the mediating role of personality and family functioning in the association between attachment styles and eating disorder status.BMC Psychol.4:36. 10.1186/s40359-016-0141-4

  • 107

    MurrayS.TouyzS.BeumontP. (1990). Knowledge about eating disorders in the community.Int. J. Eat. Disord.987–93. 10.1002/1098-108X(199001)9:1<87

  • 108

    NaickerS. N.NorrisS. A.MabasoM.RichterL. M. (2017). An analysis of retrospective and repeat prospective reports of adverse childhood experiences from the South African Birth to Twenty Plus cohort.PLoS One12:e0181522. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181522

  • 109

    NamysłowskaI.PaszkiewiczE.SiewierskaA. (2000). Gdy Odchudzanie Jest Chorobą. Anoreksja i Bulimia.Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Intra.

  • 110

    NoordenbosG.AlikbariN.CambellR. (2014). The relationship among critical inner voices, low self-esteem, and self-criticism in eating disorders.Eat. Disord.22337–351. 10.1080/10640266.2014.898983

  • 111

    O’BrienE. J.EpsteinS. (1988). The Multidimensional Self-Esteem Inventory.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  • 112

    O’BrienE. J.EpsteinS. (2009). MSEI Wielowymiarowy Kwestionariusz Samooceny. Podręcznik.Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.

  • 113

    O’BrienK. M.WhelanD. R.SandlerD. P.HallJ. E.WeinbergC. R. (2017). Predictors and long-term health outcomes of eating disorders.PLoS One12:e0181104. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181104

  • 114

    O’DeaJ. A. (2006). Self-concept, self-esteem and body weight in adolescent females: a three-year longitudinal study.J. Health Psychol.11599–611. 10.1177/1359105306065020

  • 115

    PaceC. S.CavannaD.GuiducciV.BizziF. (2015). When parenting fails: alexithymia and attachment states of mind in mothers of female patients with eating disorders.Front. Psychol.6:1145. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01145

  • 116

    PatzerG. L. (2006). The Power and Paradox of Physical Attractiveness.Boca Raton, FL: Brown Walker Press.

  • 117

    PearlR. L.WhiteM. A.GriloC. M. (2014). Overvaluation of shape and weight as a mediator between self-esteem and weight bias internalization among patients with binge eating disorder.Eat. Behav.15259–261. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.03.005

  • 118

    Pelletier BrochuJ.MeilleurD.DiMeglioG.TaddeoD.LavoieE.ErdsteinJ.et al (2018). Adolescents’ perceptions of the quality of interpersonal relationships and eating disorder symptom severity: the mediating role of low self-esteem and negative mood.Eat. Disord.26388–406. 10.1080/10640266.2018.1454806

  • 119

    PhelpsL.JohnstonL. S.AugustyniakK. (2007). Prevention of eating disorders: identification of predictor variables.Eat. Disord.799–108. 10.1080/10640269908251189

  • 120

    PileckiM.JózefikB.SałapaK. (2014). Powiązania pomiędzy spostrzeganiem funkcjonowania rodziny przez pacjentki z zaburzeniami odżywiania się i ich rodziców a percepcją relacji w rodzinach pochodzenia rodziców.Psychiatr. Pol.48789–808.

  • 121

    PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.Behav. Res. Methods40879–891. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

  • 122

    ReboussinB. A.RejeskiW. J.MartinK. A.CallahanK.DunnA. L.KingA. C.et al (2000). Correlates of satisfaction with body function and body appearance in middle- and older aged adults: the activity counselling trial (ACT).Psychol. Health15239–254. 10.1080/08870440008400304

  • 123

    RzońcaE.BieńA.Iwanowicz-PalusG. (2016). Eating disorders – An ongoing problem.J. Educ. Health Sport6267–273. 10.5281/zenodo.198734

  • 124

    Sadeh-SharvitS.ArnowK. D.OsipovL.LockJ. D.JoB.PajaritoS.et al (2018). Are parental self-efficacy and family flexibility mediators of treatment for anorexia nervosa?Int. J. Eat. Disord.51275–280. 10.1002/eat.22826

  • 125

    ScabiniE.MartaE.LanzM. (2006). The Transition to Adulthood and Family Relations: An Intergenerational Approach.New York, NY: Psychology Press.

  • 126

    SmilksteinG. (1978). The family APGAR: a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians.J. Fam. Pract.61231–1239.

  • 127

    SmilksteinG.AshworthC.MontanoD. (1982). Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function.J. Fam. Pract.15303–311.

  • 128

    SminkF. R. E.van HoekenD.DijkstraJ. K.DeenM.OldehinkelA. J.HoekH. W. (2018). Self-esteem and peer-perceived social status in early adolescence and prediction of eating pathology in young adulthood.Int. J. Eat. Disord.51852–862. 10.1002/eat.22875

  • 129

    SolmiF.HatchS. L.HotopfM.TreasureJ.MicaliN. (2015). Validation of the SCOFF Questionnaire for eating disorders in a multiethnic general population sample.Int. J. Eat. Disord.48312–216. 10.1002/eat.22373

  • 130

    StanghelliniG.CastelliniG.BrognaP.FaravelliC.RiccaV. (2012). Identity and eating disorders (IDEA): a questionnaire evaluating identity and embodiment in eating disorder patients.Psychopathology45147–158. 10.1159/000330258

  • 131

    SternheimL. C.FisherM.HarrisonA.WatlingR. (2017). Predicting intolerance of uncertainty in individuals with eating disorder symptoms.J. Eat. Disord.5:313. 10.1186/s40337-017-0152-4

  • 132

    StewartC.VoulgariS.EislerI.HuntK.SimicM. (2015). Multi-family therapy for bulimia nervosa in adolescence.Eat. Disord.23345–355. 10.1080/10640266

  • 133

    SticeE.WhitentonK. (2002). Risk factors for body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls: a longitudinal investigation.Dev. Psychol.38669–678. 10.1037//0012-1649.38.5.669

  • 134

    Striegel-MooreR. H.BulikC. M. (2007). Risk factors for eating disorders.Am. Psychol.62181–198. 10.1037/0003-066X.62.3.181

  • 135

    SuzukiH.TomodaA. (2015). Roles of attachment and self-esteem: impact of early life stress on depressive symptoms among Japanese institutionalized children.BMC Psychiatry15:8. 10.1186/s12888-015-0385-1

  • 136

    SwearerS. M.HymelS. (2015). Understanding the psychology of bullying: moving toward a social-ecological diathesis-stress model.Am. Psychol.70344–353. 10.1037/a0038929

  • 137

    TablerJ.UtzR. L. (2015). The influence of adolescent eating disorders or disordered eating behaviors on socioeconomic achievement in early adulthood.Int. J. Eat. Disord.48622–632. 10.1002/eat.22395

  • 138

    TascaG. A.SzadkowskiL.IllingV.TrinneerA.GrenonR.DemidenkoN.et al (2009). Adult attachment, depression, and eating disorder symptoms: the mediating role of affect regulation strategies.Pers. Individ. Diff.47662–667. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.006

  • 139

    TetzlaffA.HilbertA. (2014). The role of the family in childhood and adolescent binge eating – A systematic review.Appetite76:208. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.050

  • 140

    ThompsonJ. K.HeinbergL. J. (1999). The media’s influence on body image disturbance and eating disorders: we’ve reviled them, now can we rehabilitate them?J. Soc. Issues55339–353. 10.1111/0022-4537.00119

  • 141

    TroisiA.Di LorenzoG.AlciniS.NanniR. C.Di PasqualeC.SiracusanoA. (2006). Body dissatisfaction in women with eating disorders: relationship to early separation anxiety and insecure attachment.Psychosom. Med.64449–453. 10.1097/01.psy.0000204923.5b

  • 142

    TsongY.SmartR. (2015). The role of cultural beliefs in disordered eating among Asian-American women.Asian Am. J. Psychol.6342–349. 10.1037/aap0000029

  • 143

    van DurmeK.BraetC.GoosensL. (2015). Insecure attachment and eating pathology in early adolescence: role of emotion regulation.J. Early Adolesc.3554–78. 10.1177/0272431614523130

  • 144

    VartanianL. R.HaywardL. E.SmythJ. M.PaxtonS. J.TouyzS. W. (2018). Risk and resiliency factors related to body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: the identity disruption model.Int. J. Eat. Disord.51322–330. 10.1002/eat.22835

  • 145

    VohsK. D.BardoneA. M.JoinerT. E.Jr.AbramsonL. Y.HeathertonT. F. (1999). Perfectionism, perceived weight status, and self-esteem interact to predict bulimic symptoms: a model of bulimic symptom development.J. Abnorm. Psychol.108695–700. 10.1037/0021-843X.108.4.695

  • 146

    von RansonK. M. (2008). “Personality and eating disorders,” in Annual Review of Eating Disorders (Part 2), edsWonderlichS.MitchellJ. E.de ZwaanM.SteigerH. (New York, NY: Radcliffe), 84–96.

  • 147

    WeiM.VogelD. L.KuT. Y.ZakalikR. A. (2005). Adult attachment, affect regulation, negative mood, and interpersonal problems: the mediating roles of emotional reactivity and emotional cut-off.J. Couns. Psychol.5214–24. 10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.14

  • 148

    Weinberger-LitmanS. L.RabinL. A.FogelJ.MensingerJ. L.LitmanL. (2016). Psychosocial mediators of the relationship between religious orientation and eating disorder risk factors in young Jewish women.Psychol. Relig. Spiritual.8265–276. 10.1037/a0040293

  • 149

    WilliamsG. J.ChamoveA. S.MillarH. R. (1990). Eating disorders, perceived control, assertiveness and hostility.Br. J. Clin. Psychol.29327–335. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1990.tb00889.x

  • 150

    WilliamsG. J.PowerK. G.MillarH. R.FreemanC. P.YellowleesA.DowdsT.et al (1993). Comparison of eating disorders and other dietary/weight groups on measures of perceived control, assertiveness, self-esteem, and self-directed hostility.Int. J. Eat. Disord.1427–32. 10.1002/1098-108X(199307)14:13.0.CO;2-F

  • 151

    WilliamsS.ReidM. (2012). ‘It’s like there are two people in my head’: a phenomenological exploration of anorexia nervosa and its relationship to the self.Psychol. Health27798–815. 10.1080/08870446.2011.595488

  • 152

    WuZ. Q.SunL.SunY. H.ZhangX. J.TaoF. B.CuiG. H. (2010). Correlation between loneliness and social relationship among empty nest elderly in Anhui rural area, China.Aging Ment. Health14108–112. 10.1080/13607860903228796

  • 153

    YoungJ. E.KloskoJ. S.WeishaarM. E. (2003). Schema Therapy: A Prectitioner’s Guide.New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

  • 154

    ZachrissonH. D.SkårderudF. (2010). Feelings of insecurity: review of attachment and eating disorders.Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev.1897–106. 10.1002/erv.999

  • 155

    ZarychtaK.MullanB.KrukM.LuszczynskaA. (2017). A vicious cycle among cognitions and behaviors enhancing risk for eating disorders. BMC Psychiatry17:154. 10.1186/s12888-017-1328-9

  • 156

    ZiółkowskaB. (2005). Anoreksja Od A do Z. Poradnik dla Nauczycieli i Wychowawców.Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SCHOLAR.

Summary

Keywords

eating disorders, self-esteem, family functioning, adulthood, mediation

Citation

Kroplewski Z, Szcześniak M, Furmańska J and Gójska A (2019) Assessment of Family Functioning and Eating Disorders – The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem. Front. Psychol. 10:921. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00921

Received

11 June 2018

Accepted

05 April 2019

Published

24 April 2019

Volume

10 - 2019

Edited by

Carrie J. McAdams, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Reviewed by

Urszula Barbara Kelley, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States; Alissa Haedt-Matt, Illinois Institute of Technology, United States; Leah M. Hecht, Henry Ford Health System, United States, in collaboration with reviewer AH-M

Updates

Copyright

© 2019 Kroplewski, Szcześniak, Furmańska and Gójska.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Małgorzata Szcześniak,

This article was submitted to Eating Behavior, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics