%A Yan,Lirong %A Wang,Yi %A Ding,Changhao %A Liu,Mutian %A Yan,Fuwu %A Guo,Konghui %D 2019 %J Frontiers in Psychology %C %F %G English %K Personality,Electroencephalography,Driving Behavior,Source Restruction,Clustering analysis,Simulated driving %Q %R 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01524 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2019-July-03 %9 Original Research %# %! Correlation among behavior, personality and EEG in driving %* %< %T Correlation Among Behavior, Personality, and Electroencephalography Revealed by a Simulated Driving Experiment %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01524 %V 10 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 1664-1078 %X Drivers play the most important role in the human-vehicle-environment system and driving behaviors are significantly influenced by the cognitive state of the driver and his/her personality. In this paper, we aimed to explore the correlation among driving behaviors, personality and electroencephalography (EEG) using a simulated driving experiment. A total of 36 healthy subjects participated in the study. The 64-channel EEG data and the driving data, including the real-time position of the vehicle, the rotation angle of the steering wheel and the speed were acquired simultaneously during driving. The Cattell 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) was utilized to evaluate the personalities of subjects. Through hierarchical clustering of the 16PF personality traits, the subjects were divided into four groups, i.e., the Inapprehension group, Insensitivity group, Apprehension group and the Unreasoning group, named after their representative personality trait. Their driving performance and turning behaviors were compared and EEG preprocessing, source reconstruction and the comparisons among the four groups were performed using Statistical Parameter Mapping (SPM). The turning process of the subjects can be formulated into two steps, rotating the steering wheel toward the turning direction and entering the turn, and then rotating the steering wheel back and leaving the turn. The bilateral frontal gyrus was found to be activated when turning left and right, which might be associated with its function in attention, decision-making and executive control functions in visual-spatial and visual-motor processes. The Unreasoning group had the worst driving performance with highest rates of car collision and the most intensive driving action, which was related to a higher load of visual spatial attention and decision making, when the occipital and superior frontal areas played a very important role. Apprehension (O) and Tension (Q4) had a positive correlation, and Reasoning (B) had a negative correlation with dangerous driving behaviors. Our results demonstrated the close correlation among driving behaviors, personality and EEG and may be taken as a reference for the prediction and precaution of dangerous driving behaviors in people with specific personality traits.