Impact Factor 2.129 | CiteScore 2.40
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Psychol., 08 August 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01690

The Relationship Between Big Five and Self-Control in Boxers: A Mediating Model

Guodong Zhang1*, Xin Chen1, Luxia Xiao2, Yun Li1, Bing Li1, Zi Yan3, Liya Guo1 and Detlef H. Rost1,4
  • 1Key Lab of Physical Fitness Evaluation and Motor Function Monitoring of General Administration of Sports of China, College of Physical Education, Institute of Sports Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Center for Mental Health Education, School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
  • 3Health Sciences Department, Merrimack College, North Andover, MA, United States
  • 4Department of Child and Youth Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Self-control seems to be the core element for achieving optimal competitive performance, and be of great importance to well-being and healthy development of humans. According to the literature, there exist some correlations between personality traits and self-control. The aim of this study was to shed some additional light on the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and self-control in boxers and investigate self-efficacy as a mediator between the two variables. Two hundred and ten boxers (age: M = 18.89, SD = 3.83; amount of boxing practice: M = 4.93 years, SD = 3.22; 76 males) of Chinese national athletes participated the study. Results showed a pronounced level of self-control. The higher the competitive level, the higher the level of self-control. There were significant correlations among the Big Five, self-control, and self-efficacy. Self-efficacy mediated the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and self-control.

Introduction

Self-control refers to the phenomenon of people overcoming their natural and automatic tendencies, desires, and behaviors and resisting short-term temptations to achieve long-term goals (Baumeister et al., 2007). It is essential for the well-being and healthy development of humans. Sigmund Freud believed that self-control is a major characteristic of a civilized society (Freud, 1993), while Hare et al. suggested that “the ability to exercise self-control is the key to human success and happiness” (Hare et al., 2009). Good self-control not only prevents drug abuse, criminal offenses, and other undesirable social behaviors, but also promotes the healthy growth of individuals and the harmonious development of society (Moffitt et al., 2011; Tangney et al., 2014). Self-control seems to be the core element for achieving optimal competitive performance (Zhang, 2013; Englert, 2016). Scholars in sport psychology have called for research that “gives a voice” to marginalized groups, which would arguably include boxers (Fisher et al., 2003; Ryba and Wright, 2005; Simpson and Wrisberg, 2013). Boxers should have a pronounced self-control and self-efficacy (Lane, 2006; Yu et al., 2012). Thus, boxing is well suited for applied sport psychology interventions (Schinke, 2007); more emphasis should be put into research on the self-control and self-efficacy of boxers.

Exploring the relationships between self-control, personality traits, and self-efficacy can serve as a starting point for an in-depth study of self-control. Mao et al. (2018) found that openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness were all positively correlated with self-control, and neuroticism was negatively related to self-control. In addition, Vera et al. (2004) believe that self-control is affected by self-efficacy. Most of the existing research on self-control in sporting contexts focused on soccer players, divers, middle-distance runners, and college athletes of all types. There is only limited research on the psychology of boxing in China, especially on the relationship between boxers’ personality traits and self-control. This study invited Chinese boxers of national athletes to take part in an examination of the relationship between their personality traits and self-control, and to look for any mediating effect of self-efficacy.

Personality Traits and Self-Control

Previous studies have well documented the relationship between the Big Five and self-control. Neuroticism has a negative correlation with self-control; agreeableness, extraversion, openness, and responsibility are positively related to self-control; self-control is a prerequisite for individuals to adapt to their social environment (Andrei et al., 2014; Coyne and Wright, 2014). In addition, researchers found differences in the relationship between extraversion, openness, and self-control; some studies found that extraversion and self-control had a significant negative correlation (Green et al., 2016), while some others found extraversion was not significantly related with self-control (De Vries and Van Gelder, 2013). In the same way, researches on the relationship between openness and self-control had also produced inconsistent results (Andrei et al., 2014; Bazzy et al., 2017). Due to its consistency and stability across languages and cultures (Pilarska, 2018), the Big Five is often used to predict self-control (McCrae and Terracciano, 2005). Therefore, due to the inconsistency of the relationship between Big Five and self-control, and lack of studies among boxers, we hypothesized that 1: Neuroticism is negatively correlated with self-control, while agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion are positively correlated with self-control among Chinese boxers.

Personality Traits and Self-Efficacy

Personality traits are important factors influencing the self-efficacy of individuals (Stajkovic et al., 2018). Studies have linked the Big Five traits and self-efficacy (Judge et al., 2007; Cristina et al., 2018; Coco et al., 2019), for example, neuroticism is negatively correlated with self-efficacy, and extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and responsibility positively correlated with self-efficacy (Judge et al., 2007). Some scholars found that individuals with higher scores of conscientiousness had higher self-efficacy beliefs (Brown et al., 2011). Openness shifts perceptions of demands into challenges to be tackled, broadening task engagement and self-efficacy (Sanchez-Cardona et al., 2012). Research has found that agreeableness can lead to increased self-efficacy (Caprara et al., 2010). Certain researchers have found that individual self-efficacy is positively correlated with extraversion and negatively correlated with neuroticism (Schmitt, 2007). The finding of Djigić et al. (2014) indicated that conscientiousness predicts the self-efficacy of teachers, while Marcionetti and Rossier (2016) believed that conscientiousness, neuroticism, and extraversion are significantly correlated with self-efficacy. Furthermore, Brown and Cinamon (2016) proposed that higher conscientiousness and extraversion, and lower neuroticism, help enhance self-efficacy.

In sports, Wang et al. (2009) found that neuroticism has a significant negative predictive effect on the general self-efficacy of basketball players, while extraversion and conscientiousness have significant positive predictive effects. Based on the existing literature, the current study hypothesized that neuroticism is negatively correlated with self-efficacy, while agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion are positively correlated with self-efficacy in boxers.

Self-Control and Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy may play a mediating role between personality and self-control. According to Bandura’s self-efficacy and self-regulation theories, self-control is affected by self-efficacy, and there was a significant positive correlation between the two (Bandura, 1978). Research found a positive correlation between self-efficacy and self-control (Au, 2015). Graham and Bray (2015) studied self-efficacy as a psychological factor to explain how self-control is performed. Baumeister’s analysis showed that self-control requires an individual’s own control resources, and self-efficacy complements this resource by acting as a positive emotion (Baumeister, 2002). Yu and Yang’s (2008) study concluded that there is an interaction effect between self-efficacy beliefs and self-control behavior.

A large number of researches have shown that there is a positive correlation between self-efficacy and self-control in different population groups (Huang and Yang, 2015). Jones et al. found that self-efficacy and sense of control are important indicators of an athlete’s state (Jones et al., 2009). Research shows that self-efficacy had a positive effect on self-control in athletes (Yang et al., 2013). Specifically, self-efficacy mediated the relationship between other psychological traits and self-control among different groups (Wang et al., 2009; Fang et al., 2015). Therefore, the present study further explores whether self-efficacy has a positive effect on self-control in boxers, and whether self-efficacy has a mediating effect between personality traits and self-control. The current study hypothesized: the self-efficacy and the self-control of Chinese boxers are positively correlated; the self-efficacy of Chinese boxers mediates the effects of neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion on self-control.

Materials and Methods

Sample

The participants, acquired by cluster sampling, comprised boxers from Chinese national boxing teams as well as teams at several provinces and cities including Shenyang, Hubei, Anhui, Inner Mongolia, Chongqing, and Sichuan. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Permission was obtained from the Southwest University’s Human Research Ethics Committee. Prior to answering the items, participants read information about the purpose of the study, implications of participation, and data protection. The information stressed that participation was completely voluntary and anonymous. A total of N = 230 questionnaires were distributed, and N = 210 valid ones (91%) were returned. Among the participants, n = 76 were males (36.2%) and n = 134 females (63.8%). There were 79 Level-3 athletes (37.6%), 24 Level-2 athletes (11.4%), 49 Level-1 athletes (23.3%), 45 Master-Level athletes (21.4%), and 13 athletes at the International Master-Level (6.2%). Level-3 is the lowest and the International Master-Level is the highest. The average age was M = 18.89 years (SD = 3.83), with the average prior training period being M = 4.93 years (SD = 3.22). Fifty participants were under 18 years of age and permissions from their parents were obtained; written and informed consent was obtained from the parents/legal guardians of all non-adult participants. The average time for completing the survey was 20 min.

Procedure

After receiving informed consent from the management, coaches, and athletes of the national team and other sports teams, the questionnaires were distributed to teams at the provincial level or above. The instructions were explained in detail and example questions were provided to the participants, who were asked to read the questionnaire carefully and answer it. The questionnaires were distributed at Jilin Sport University, Wuhan Sport University, Anhui, Inner Mongolia, Chongqing, and Sichuan between the 11th of October and the 9th of November, 2017.

Measures

NEO Five-Factor Inventory

Personality was measured with the validated Chinese NEO-PI-R (Costam and McCrae, 1992; Chen et al., 2016). The NEO-PI-R contains 60 items and is one of the most widely used measures for the Big Five personality traits. The self-report items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree (1)” to “strongly agree (5)” and reflect the five higher order domains Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experiences, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. There are 12 items per FFM-FFI domain. A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the one-dimensionality of the scale (CFA): χ2/df = 1.33, RMSE = 0.04, TLI = 0.99, GFI = 0.98, CFI = 0.99. The factor loadings of the items ranged between a = 0.50 and a = 0.73. The internal consistencies of the inventory’s five scales were α = 0.77 (Neuroticism), α = 0.76 (Agreeableness), α = 0.80 (Conscientiousness), α = 0.72 (Extraversion), and α = 0.57 (Openness). The Openness scale was not used furthermore due to its unsatisfactory internal consistency and its cultural unsuitability for Chinese boxers.

Self-Control Questionnaire for Athletes

Self-control was measured by a 24-item, 5-point Likert Chinese scale questionnaire, ranging from “1 = not at all” to “5 = very much”; higher scores indicate better self-control (item example: “In order to complete the training task, I can endure extreme fatigue”). In a previous study, the scale provided a reference for athlete selection (Li and Zhang, 2011). A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the one-dimensionality of the scale (CFA): χ2/df = 1.15, RMSEA = 0.03, TLI = 0.97, GFI = 0.92, NFI = 0.87, CFI = 0.98. The factor loadings of the items ranged from a = 0.49 to a = 0.75. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was good (α = 0.87).

Self-Efficacy Scale for Athletes

Based on self-efficacy theory and related theories about competitive sports, Wei et al. (2008) compiled a self-efficacy scale for athletes in intensive sports. This scale consisted of 15 items, such as “I can keep my mind clear and focused during the competition.” Each item was measured by a 5-point scale (1 = never been like this; 5 = always so). A higher score indicates a higher self-efficacy. The one-dimensionality of the scale was proved by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA): χ2/df = 1.07, RMSEA = 0.02, TLI = 0.99, GFI = 0.96, NFI = 0.95, CFI = 0.99, IFI = 0.99. The factor loadings of the items ranged from a = 0.43 to a = 0.75. The internal consistency of the scale was good (α = 0.92).

Data Analyses

A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, LSD-post hoc test) was run for testing mean differences. The bias-corrected percentile bootstrap method was used to conduct regression analyses (Fang et al., 2012). To implement this method, we used the Model 4 PROCESS macro for SPSS created by Hayes (2013). Gender, age, years of training, and competitive level were controlled. The 95% confidence intervals of the mediating effects are reported. The statistical significance level was set to α = 0.05.

Results

Testing for Common Method Bias

To avoid response bias, some items in the questionnaires were expressed in reverse wording, AMOS 21.0 was used to conduct a CFA, with the common factor of all variables set to 1, and all item variables were used as explicit variables. The CFA results showed that the model fit was low, indicating no serious common method bias. (χ2/df = 2.01, RMSEA = 0.07, NFI = 0.34, CFI = 0.50, TLI = 0.49, GFI = 0.55, IFI = 0.50).

Self-Control and Self-Efficacy: Group Differences

The averaged item score of the self-control was M = 3.68 (SD = 0.49), indicating a relatively high level of self-control among boxers in China. This study also examined the effect of gender and competitive level differences on self-control; the results indicated no significant gender differences (F = 1.14, p = 0.28, d = −0.011), but a significant main effect of competitive level (F = 7.81, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.12). The interaction between gender and competitive level was not significant (F = 1.82, p = 0.13, η2 = 0.04). The item-based averaged self-control scores of boxers from the five different competitive levels were significantly different. The higher the competitive level, the higher the level of self-control (International Master-Level: M = 3.92, SD = 0.62; Master-Level M = 3.79, SD = 0.48; Level-1: M = 3.77, SD = 0.45, Level-2: M = 3.83, SD = 0.49; Level-3: M = 3.47, SD = 0.43. The simple analysis showed that the averaged item score of self-control in International Master-Level was significantly higher than that of the Level-3, p < 0.01, d = 0.98).

The average item score of self-efficacy was M = 3.50 (SD = 0.64), indicating that the Chinese boxers’ self-efficacy exceeds the theoretical item mean. There was no significant difference between male and female boxers (p > 0.05, d = 0.24). The mean item scores of self-efficacy among boxers from five different competitive levels differed significantly: the higher the competitive level, the higher the self-efficacy (International Master-Level: M = 3.81, SD = 0.76; Master-Level: M = 3.66, SD = 0.60; Level-1: M = 3.53, SD = 0.58; Level-2: M = 3.60, SD = 0.71; Level-3: M = 3.30, SD = 0.60). There was a significant difference on self-efficacy between International Master-Level and Level-3 (p < 0.01, d = 0.81).

Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Control: Correlations

Neuroticism was significantly and negatively correlated with self-efficacy and self-control, while extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were significantly and positively correlated with self-efficacy and self-control. Self-efficacy and self-control were positively correlated (see Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Means, standard deviations, and correlation coefficients of personality traits, self-control, and self-efficacy.

Testing for Mediation by Self-Efficacy on Effects of Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Extraversion, and Conscientiousness on Self-Control

This study used the Bootstrap method proposed by Fang et al. (2012) and the Model 4 PROCESS macro for SPSS created by Hayes (2013) to conduct mediating effect testing; gender, competitive level, age, and years of training were set as control variables.

Regression analysis showed that neuroticism negatively predicted self-efficacy (β = −0.23, p < 0.01), while self-efficacy positively predicted self-control (β = 0.88, p < 0.001). Neuroticism negatively predicted self-control (β = −0.32, p < 0.001). Extraversion was a positive predictor of self-efficacy (β = 0.17, p < 0.001), while self-efficacy positively predicted self-control (β = 0.78, p < 0.001). Extraversion and self-efficacy were positive predictors of self-control (β = 0.27, p < 0.001). Agreeableness positively predicted self-efficacy (β = 0.26, p < 0.001), and self-efficacy was a positive predictor of self-control (β = 0.77, p < 0.001), as was agreeableness (β = 0.44, p < 0.001). Conscientiousness positively predicted self-efficacy (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), and self-efficacy was a positive predictor of self-control (β = 0.58, p < 0.001), as was conscientiousness (β = 0.47, p < 0.001).

Figures 14 present the standardized effects of the paths of neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness on self-control. The bootstrap 95% confidence interval of the indirect effect of self-efficacy did not comprise 0, indicating that self-efficacy had a significant mediating effect on neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Conscientiousness had a mediating effect on self-control. Taking together, neuroticism explained 22% of the change in self-efficacy, extraversion 27%, agreeableness 26%, and conscientiousness 50%. As such, H4 was confirmed.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Neuroticism → self-efficacy → self-control. *Statistically significant.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Extraversion → self-efficacy → self-control. *Statistically significant.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Agreeableness → self-efficacy → self-control. *Statistically significant.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Conscientiousness → self-efficacy → self-control. *Statistically significant.

Discussion

Direct Influence of Personality Traits on Self-Control

In the current study, there were significant positive correlations between agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and self-control, and a negative correlation between neuroticism and self-control.

Previous studies have shown that agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion are positively related to self-control (Bazzy et al., 2017), while neuroticism significantly correlated with self-control (Andrei et al., 2014). Based on those studies, the current study assumed that neuroticism is negatively correlated with self-control, while agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion are positively correlated with self-control. These hypotheses are supported and are consistent with the results of Deng and Gao (2015) and Pilarska (2018).

Avoiding injuries and reducing the number of fouls are very important skills for boxers. Self-control is a very important psychological characteristic that influences those skills (Yu et al., 2012). By understanding the mediating relationship between personality and self-control, boxers can not only avoid injuries but also reduce the number of fouls by improving their self-control level and their own skills and tactics (Ba and Zhu, 2008). Song et al. (2009) suggested that boxers should continuously enhance their psychological stability by focusing on the actual combat element of boxing. Therefore, the Big Five factors and the self-control could perhaps be used as psychological criteria to select boxers and the relationship between them is an important first step in order to further boxers. Longitudinal research is needed to evaluate the relevance of these predictors.

The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy Between Personality Traits and Self-Control

Studies have shown that four of the Big Five factors have indirect predictive effects on self-control through self-efficacy. Theories of self-efficacy hold that the subjective judgment and self-feeling that individuals have about their ability to perform a certain behavior or tasks play an important role in the decision-making process before a behavior is performed (Eastin and La-Rose, 2000). In sporting contexts, scholars have found that the stronger an athletes’ self-efficacy, the better their performance in sports as diverse as athletics, tennis, scuba diving, and gymnastics (Vancouver et al., 2002): when athletes perform a task for the first time, their self-efficacy affects their performance (Myers et al., 2004). Other studies have demonstrated that, even despite excellent skills and motivation to win, people with outstanding capabilities are less likely to achieve success if they have poor self-efficacy (Earley and Lituchy, 1991). The present study hypothesized that neuroticism is negatively correlated with self-control, while agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion are positively correlated with self-control; and these hypotheses were supported by the results of this study and are consistent with the results of Zhang (2016) and Marcionetti and Rossier (2016). Moreover, the recent study found that self-efficacy has a significant positive predictive effect on self-control, consistent with the results of Huang and Yang (2015) and Kaida et al. (2006).

The present study also hypothesized that self-efficacy mediates the effects of neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion on self-control. The present study observed four mediating paths, showing partial mediating effects of self-efficacy on self-control for each personality trait variable. Many other researchers have also found that self-efficacy mediates the link between personality traits and self-control, such as Fang et al. (2015) and Stajkovic et al. (2018). Therefore, cultivating and upgrading the self-efficacy of boxers should be emphasized in their training.

Limitations

Firstly, with the cross-sectional design, no causal relationship could be established. Secondly, the present study focused on the role of self-efficacy in the relationship between Big Five personality traits and self-control, but there are still many other important mediating variables which may influence self-control, such as depression, anxiety, or self-esteem and self-concept, which should also be explored in future research. Finally, the current study focused on Chinese boxers. Further research is needed to figure out whether the results of this study can be generalized to other sports or western cultures.

Despite these limitations, the present study contributes to understand the inherent relationship between big five personality and self-control as well as its possible mechanisms among Chinese boxers. The exploration of the variables can add a fruitful avenue toward the development of knowledge about the processes involved in self-control in sport.

Conclusions

First, there were significant differences in self-control and self-efficacy among boxers of different competitive levels. Second, there are significant correlations of neuroticism and agreeableness, conscientiousness, and extraversion with self-control, indicating that these four dimensions are direct statistical predictors of self-control. Self-efficacy is positively correlated with self-control. Finally, boxers’ self-efficacy mediates personality traits and self-control, indicating that personality traits predict self-control not only directly but also indirectly through self-efficacy. Overall, the mediation effect models constructed in this study had some explanatory power for self-control.

Data Availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Ethics Statement

The protocol was approved by the Southwest University’s Human Research Ethics Committee. Prior to initiation of the study, all subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by the Sports Scientific Research Project of Chongqing in 2016 (B201622), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (SWU1809220) and (SWU1709116).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Andrei, F., Mancini, G., Trombini, E., Baldaro, B., and Russo, P. M. (2014). Testing the incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence: evidence from an Italian sample of adolescents. Pers. Individ. Differ. 64, 24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Au, E. W. (2015). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and the mediating effect of outcome control: predicting course-level and global outcomes in an academic context. Anxiety Stress Coping 28, 425–444. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.976761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ba, Y. M., and Zhu, R. H. (2008). Construction of index system of selecting reserve talent for top notch male boxers of our country. J. Shanghai Univ. Sport 32, 89–92. doi: 10.16099/j.cnki.jsus.2008.06.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Adv. Behav. Res. Ther. 1, 139–161. doi: 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Ego depletion and self-control failure: an energy model of the self’s executive function. Self Identity 1, 129–136. doi: 10.1080/152988602317319302

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., and Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 351–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bazzy, J. D., Woehr, D. J., and Borns, J. (2017). An examination of the role of self-control and impact of ego depletion on integrity testing. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 39, 101–111. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1283502

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, D., and Cinamon, R. G. (2016). Personality traits’ effects on self-efficacy and outcome expectations for high school major choice. Inter. J. Edu. Voc. Gui. 16, 343–361. doi: 10.1007/s10775-015-9316-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K., and Tramayne, S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: a meta-analytic path analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 79, 81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Di-Giunta, L., Panerai, L., and Eisenberg, N. (2010). The contribution of agreeableness and self-efficacy beliefs to prosociality. Eur. J. Personal. 24, 36–55. doi: 10.1002/per.739

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, B. Y., Wan, L., Fang, Y., Yan, L. X., and Lan, J. J. (2016). Interpersonal self-support traits predicting interpersonal trust among undergraduate students: beyond the effects of big five personality. J. Psychol. Sci. 6, 163–169. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20160624

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coco, M., Guerrera, C. S., Di Corrado, D., Ramaci, T., Maci, T., Pellerone, M., et al. (2019). Personality traits and athletic young adults. Sport Sci. Health 15, 435–441. doi: 10.1007/s11332-019-00551-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costam, P. T. Jr., and McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO personality inventory – revised (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Google Scholar

Coyne, M. A., and Wright, J. P. (2014). The stability of self-control across childhood. Personal. Individ. Differ. 69, 144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cristina, P. M., Marinella, C., Tiziana, M., Chiara, M., De Pasquale, C., Gianluca, D. O., et al. (2018). Successfully aging. Choice of life or life that choices. Acta Med. Austriaca 34, 107–111. doi: 10.19193/0393-6384_2018_1_18

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Vries, R. E., and Van Gelder, J. L. (2013). Tales of two self-control scales: relations with five-factor and HEXACO traits. Personal. Individ. Differ. 54, 756–760. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, S. C., and Gao, J. (2015). Big five personality and impulsive buying: the mediation of self-control and sensation seeking. Chi. J. Cli. Psychol. 23, 1098–1101. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.06.033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Djigić, G., Stojiljković, S., and Dosković, M. (2014). Basic personality dimensions and teachers’ self-efficacy. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci. 112, 593–602. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1206

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Earley, P. C., and Lituchy, T. R. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects: a test of three models. J. Appl. Psychol. 76, 81–98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.81

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eastin, M. S., and La-Rose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. J. Compu. Medi. Communi. 6, 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Englert, C. (2016). The strength model of self-control in sport and exercise psychology. Front. Psychol. 7, 824–826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00314

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, X., Liu, J., and Zheng, Z. (2015). The relationship among self-supporting personality, self-efficacy and self-control of undergraduates. Stu. Psychol. Behav. 13, 500–505. http://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1456.shtml

Google Scholar

Fang, J., Zhang, M. Q., and Chou, H. J. (2012). Mediation analysis and effect size measurement: retrospect and prospect. Psychol. Devel. Edu. 28, 105–111. doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2012.01.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fisher, L. A., Butryn, T. M., and Roper, E. A. (2003). Diversifying (and politicizing) sport psychology through cultural studies: a promising perspective. Sport Psychol. 17, 391–405. doi: 10.1123/tsp.17.4.391

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1993). New introductory lectures on psychology-analysis New York: Norton.

Google Scholar

Graham, J. D., and Bray, S. R. (2015). Self-control strength depletion reduces self-efficacy and impairs exercise performance. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 37, 477–488. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2015-0064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Green, J. A., O’Connor, D. B., Gartland, N., and Roberts, B. W. (2016). The Chernyshenko conscientiousness scales: a new facet measure of conscientiousness. Assessment 23, 374–385. doi: 10.1177/1073191115580639

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., and Rangel, A. (2009). Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 324, 646–648. doi: 10.1126/science.1168450

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Google Scholar

Huang, W., and Yang, Z. (2015). Goal orientation, self-efficacy, and self-control among 3~6 years old children. Psychol. Dev. Educ. 31, 547–554. doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.05.05

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, M., Meijen, C., McCarthy, P. J., and Sheffield, D. (2009). A theory of challenge and threat states in athletes. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2, 161–180. doi: 10.1080/17509840902829331

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., and Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 107–127. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaida, K., Ogawa, K., Matsuura, N., Takahashi, M., and Hori, T. (2006). The relationship between nap habit with self-awakening and generalized self-efficacy. J. J. Health. Psychol. 19, 1–9. doi: 10.11560/jahp.19.1_1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lane, A. M. (2006). Article commentary: Reflections of professional boxing consultancy: a response to Schinke (2004). Athletic Insight 8, 85–90. Retrieved from http://www.athleticinsight.com/Vol8Iss3/Reflections.htm

Google Scholar

Li, X. Y., and Zhang, L. W. (2011). “The structure and messuerment of self-control of athletes” in The 90th Anniversary of the Chinese Psychological Society and the National Conference on Psychology, 639–640.

Google Scholar

Mao, T., Pan, W., Zhu, Y., Yang, J., Dong, Q., and Zhou, G. (2018). Self-control mediates the relationship between personality trait and impulsivity. Personal. Individ. Differ. 129, 70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marcionetti, J., and Rossier, J. (2016). Global life satisfaction in adolescence: the role of personality traits, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. J. Individ. Differ. 37, 135–144. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000198

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., and Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: data from 50 cultures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 547–561. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., et al. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2693–2698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., and Short, S. E. (2004). Collective efficacy and team performance: a longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 8, 126–138. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.126

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pilarska, A. (2018). Big-five personality and aspects of the self-concept: variable-and person-centered approaches. Personal. Individ. Differ. 127, 107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryba, T. V., and Wright, H. K. (2005). From mental game to cultural praxis: a cultural studies model’s implications for the future of sport psychology. QUEST 7, 192–212. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2005.10491853

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanchez-Cardona, I., Rodriguez-Montalbán, R., Acevedo-Soto, E., Lugo, K. N., Torres-Oquendo, F., and Toro-Alfonso, J. (2012). Self-efficacy and openness to experience as antecedent of study engagement: an exploratory analysis. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 46, 2163–2167. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.446

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schinke, R. J. (2007). A four-year chronology with national team boxing in Canada. J. Sports Sci. Med. 6, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.07.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2007). The interaction of neuroticism and gender and its impact on self-efficacy and performance. Hum. Perform. 21, 49–61. doi: 10.1080/08959280701522197

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simpson, D., and Wrisberg, C. (2013). Fail to prepare, prepare to fail: professional boxers experiences of training. Sport Psychol. 27, 109–119. doi: 10.1123/tsp.27.2.109

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, Q., Shen, D. D., and Gao, X. F. (2009). Thinking about the actual exertion of combat technique of Chinese boxing players in Beijing olympics-the issue of combined training about Chinese high level professional players. J. Guangzhou Sport Univ. 29, 88–90. doi: 10.13830/j.cnki.cn44-1129/g8.2009.05.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stajkovic, A. D., Bandura, A., Locke, E. A., Lee, D., and Sergent, K. (2018). Test of three conceptual models of influence of the big five personality traits and self-efficacy on academic performance: a meta-analytic path-analysis. Personal. Individ. Differ. 120, 238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tangney, J. P., Boone, A. L., and Baumeister, R. F. (2014). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J. Pers. 72, 271–324. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., Tischner, E. C., and Putka, D. J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 506–516. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.506

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vera, E. M., Shin, R. Q., Montgomery, G. P., Mildner, C., and Speight, S. L. (2004). Conflict resolution styles, self-efficacy, self-control, and future orientation of urban adolescents. Prof. School Couns. 8, 73–80. doi: 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.240

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Zhang, W., Li, Y. H., Zhang, H., and Hong, P. (2009). The relationship between personality traits, self-efficacy and stress coping styles of woman basketball players. Chi. Sport. Sci. 29, 59–64. doi: 10.16469/j.css.2009.11.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, P., Chen, H. B., and Song, B. P. (2008). Preliminary establishment of sports sense of self-efficacy scale. J. Xian Physical. Edu. Univ. 25, 128–130. doi: 10.16063/j.cnki.issn1001-747x.2008.04.030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, L. I., Li, W. Z., and Lian, C. Z. (2013). The theory of challenge and threat states in athletes and self-control in competition. Adv. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1696–1710. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01696

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Y., Hu, Y. H., Zhu, D. P., Gao, P., and Wang, M. (2012). Research on technical and tactical characteristics model of Chinese men undefined boxing Olympic champion. Beijing: Department of Science and Education, State Sport Administration. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10522-1013327790.htm

Google Scholar

Yu, G. Q., and Yang, Z. L. (2008). A research on the implicit effect of self-control. Psychol. Sci. 31, 614–616. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2008.03.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L. W. (2013). Athletes self-control: important theories and research development. J. Psychol. Sci. 36, 515–523. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2013.03.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, R. P. (2016). Positive affect and self-efficacy as mediators between personality and life satisfaction in Chinese college freshmen. J. Happiness Stud. 17, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9682-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Big Five personality traits, self-efficacy, self-control, mediating effect, boxer

Citation: Zhang G, Chen X, Xiao L, Li Y, Li B, Yan Z, Guo L and Rost DH (2019) The Relationship Between Big Five and Self-Control in Boxers: A Mediating Model. Front. Psychol. 10:1690. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01690

Received: 16 May 2019; Accepted: 04 July 2019;
Published: 08 August 2019.

Edited by:

Donatella Di Corrado, Kore University of Enna, Italy

Reviewed by:

Cristiana Conti, Università degli Studi G. d’Annunzio Chieti e Pescara, Italy
Elena Commodari, University of Catania, Italy

Copyright © 2019 Zhang, Chen, Xiao, Li, Li, Yan, Guo and Rost. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guodong Zhang, lygd777@swu.edu.cn