Systematic Review ARTICLE
A Scientometric Review of Rasch Measurement in Psychology, Medicine, and Education: The Rise and Progress of a Specialty
- 1National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- 2Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
A recent review of the literature concluded that Rasch measurement is an influential approach in psychometric modeling. However, despite the major contributions of Rasch measurement to the growth of scientific research across various fields, there is yet no research on the trends and evolution of Rasch measurement research. The present study used co-citation techniques and a multiple perspectives approach to investigate 5,365 publications on Rasch measurement between 01 January 1972 and 03 May 2019 and their 108,339 unique references downloaded from the Web of Science (WoS). Several methods of network development involving visualization and text-mining were used to analyze these data: author co-citation analysis (ACA), document co-citation analysis (DCA), journal author co-citation analysis (JCA), and keyword analysis. In addition, to investigate the inter-domain trends that link the Rasch measurement specialty to other specialties, we used a dual-map overlay to investigate specialty-to-specialty connections. Influential authors, publications, journals, and keywords were identified. Multiple research frontiers or sub-specialties were detected and the major ones were reviewed, including “visual function questionnaires”, “non-parametric item response theory”, “valid measures (validity)”, “latent class models”, and “many-facet Rasch model”. One of the outstanding patterns identified was the dominance and impact of publications written for general groups of practitioners and researchers. In personal communications, the authors of these publications stressed their mission as being “teachers” who aim to promote Rasch measurement as a conceptual model with real-world applications. Based on these findings, we propose that sociocultural and ethnographic factors have a huge capacity to influence fields of science and should be considered in future investigations of psychometrics and measurement. As the first scientometric review of the Rasch measurement specialty, this study will be of interest to researchers, graduate students, and professors seeking to identify research trends, topics, major publications, and influential scholars.
Keywords: Co-citation analysis, rasch measurement, Scientometrics analysis, systematic review (6), Cluster
Received: 09 Jul 2019;
Accepted: 12 Sep 2019.
Copyright: © 2019 Aryadoust, Hui Ann Tan and Ying Ng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mx. Vahid Aryadoust, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore, firstname.lastname@example.org