Impact Factor 2.129 | CiteScore 2.40
More on impact ›

Editorial ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Psychol. | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02558

Editorial

 Rachel Lev-Wiesel1, 2* and Denise Saint Arnault3
  • 1University of Haifa, Israel
  • 2Emili Sagol Creative Arts Therapies Research Center, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel
  • 3Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, United States

Lev-Wiesel & First, 2018). Out of those who were brought to child investigations for possible sexual victimization, about 85% of those investigations ended in closing the case, either because of lack of collaborating evidence (forensic evidence, or no witness), or the alleged victimized child's inability to provide a coherent testimony as required by the judicial system (e.g., Easton, 2013). In our view, the papers presented in this issue illustrate further evidence of the devastating outcomes of CSA, and the multidimensional aspects of trauma recovery.They also show the intergenerational complexities of CSA, and the relationship of these to both reporting and recovery.

Keywords: Childhood Sexual Abuse (CSA), Mind - body, Treatmeat outcome, Outcome, Brain

Received: 16 Oct 2019; Accepted: 29 Oct 2019.

Copyright: © 2019 Lev-Wiesel and Saint Arnault. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Prof. Rachel Lev-Wiesel, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, rlev@univ.haifa.ac.il