Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 08 February 2021
Sec. Psychology of Language

Corrigendum: An Extensive Knowledge Mapping Review of Measurement and Validity in Language Assessment and SLA Research

  • 1National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • 2Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • 3College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
  • 4Department of Information Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

A Corrigendum on
An Extensive Knowledge Mapping Review of Measurement and Validity in Language Assessment and SLA Research

by Aryadoust, V., Zakaria, A., Lim, M. H., and Chen, C. (2020). Front. Psychol. 11:1941. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01941

In the original article, there were several errors throughout the text. The corrections made are detailed in the table below.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

www.frontiersin.org

.

References

Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., and Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories. Sage Open 9, 1–17. doi: 10.1177/2158244019829575

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F., and Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Banerjee, J., Yan, X., Chapman, M., and Elliott, H. (2015). Keeping up with the times: revising and refreshing rating scale. Assess.Writ. Int. J. 26, 5–19. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borsboom, D., and Mellenbergh, G. J. (2007). “Test validity in cognitive assessment,” in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Education: Theory and Applications, eds J. P. Leighton, and M. J. Gierl (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 85–115. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611186.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carr, N. T. (2006). The factor structure of test task characteristics and examinee performance. Lang. Test. 23, 269–289. doi: 10.1191/0265532206lt328oa

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1961) “Fundamental considerations in testing for english language proficiency of foreign students,” in Testing Center for Applied Linguistics (Washington, DC). Reprinted in Allen, H.B. & Campbell, R.N. (eds.). (1972) Teaching English as a Second Language: A Book of Readings. McGraw Hill.

Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., and Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281–302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doughty, C. (2001). “Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form,” in Cognition and Second Language Instruction, eds P. Robinson, M. H. Long, and J. C. Richards (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 206–257. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fulcher, G. (n.d.). What Is Language Testing. Language Testing Resources. Available online at: http://languagetesting.info/whatis/lt.html.

Google Scholar

Kane, M. T. (2006). “Validation,” in Educational Measurement, 4th Edn, ed R. L. Brennan (Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger), 17–64.

Google Scholar

Lado, R. (1961). Language Testing: The Construction and Use of Foreign Language Tests: A Teacher's Book. Bristol: Inglaterra Longmans, Green and Company.

Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Google Scholar

Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: a research synthesis of college-level L2 Writing. Appl. Linguist. 24, 492–518. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.4.492

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: instructed second language vocabulary learning. Lang. Teach. Res. 12, 329–363. doi: 10.1177/1362168808089921

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weir, C. J. (2005a). Language Testing and Validation :An Evidence-Based Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Google Scholar

Weir, C. J. (2005b). Language Testing and Validation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230514577

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: document co-citation analysis, language assessment, measurement, review, Scientometrics, validity, visualization, Second language acquisition

Citation: Aryadoust V, Zakaria A, Lim MH and Chen C (2021) Corrigendum: An Extensive Knowledge Mapping Review of Measurement and Validity in Language Assessment and SLA Research. Front. Psychol. 11:643027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.643027

Received: 17 December 2020; Accepted: 18 December 2020;
Published: 08 February 2021.

Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2021 Aryadoust, Zakaria, Lim and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Vahid Aryadoust, vahid.aryadoust@nie.edu.sg

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.