Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Psychol., 10 May 2021
Sec. Human-Media Interaction
This article is part of the Research Topic Adverse Health Consequences of Excessive Smartphone Usage, Volume II View all 10 articles

Relation Between the Degree of Use of Smartphones and Negative Emotions in People With Visual Impairment

  • Department of Secondary Special Education, Jeonju University, Jeonju, South Korea

The use of smartphones has become commonplace, even among people with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of smartphone use on the negative emotions of people with visual impairment. This study analyzed data from 30 respondents with visual impairments obtained from the 2016 Internet Overdependence Survey in South Korea. The analysis was based on partial least squares regression with information search, leisure, communication, and online transactions as independent variables, and negative emotions comprising depression, anxiety, and loneliness as the dependent variables. Among people with visual impairment, the use of smartphones as a means of communication decreased negative emotions while their use for leisure or information search was related to an increase in negative emotions such as depression and loneliness. Use for information retrieval was found to be associated with a low level of anxiety, and use for online transactions was associated with low loneliness. The results of this study showed that the use of the Internet can be a means of providing interaction opportunities and reducing negation emotions for people with visual impairment.

Introduction

According to a survey conducted in 2015, there are more than 1.5 billion smartphone users worldwide and, overall, more than 1 billion smartphones are estimated to have been sold (Demirci et al., 2015). Smartphone ownership was 56% in 2013 in the United States (Smith, 2013) and 79% in 2012 in Switzerland (Suter et al., 2015). Based on a survey conducted in South Korea, about 9 out of 10 people own a smartphone and the usage time is steadily increasing (Jeong et al., 2020). More than 2.23 billion people use Facebook monthly, and appear to share their thoughts on social issues and details of friends through this platform (Wiese et al., 2020). In addition, more than 90% of adults in the United States visit social media websites, and in the United Kingdom people spend an average of 136 min a day on social media; such people make social comparisons through their use of social network services (SNS) and their behavior is significantly influenced by these social comparisons (Oh et al., 2014).

The 2018 Digital Information Gap Survey Report published by the National Information Society Agency (NIA) comprehensively measured the level and characteristics of the information gap occurring in the digital environment of South Korea and found that, taking the level of the general public as 100, the level of digital informatization of people with disabilities was 74.6% as of 2018. This was higher than the average (68.9%) of people with disabilities, low-income, farmers, fishermen, and the elderly, which comprised the information-vulnerable groups in the digital information gap survey and was the second highest after the low-income group (86.8%). Even relative to other groups, this information gap for people with disabilities has been increasing every year (National Information Society Agency, 2019).

Quantitative growth and the narrowing of the gap in accessibility are the result of policy measures, such as the information and communication assistive device distribution project and development projects for people with disabilities who have difficulty accessing information due to physical and economic conditions (Baxter et al., 2012; Duplaga, 2017). The use of the Internet can provide opportunities for people with disabilities to enhance their independence, access online services such as e-banking and Internet shopping, and communicate with family and friends through e-mail or video conferencing. Through such ways, it can greatly improve their daily lives (D’Aubin, 2007; Duplaga, 2017). The Internet can be a viable way to promote social participation for people with disabilities (Raghavendra et al., 2013) who can use information and communication assistive devices to overcome their physical limitations and to engage in socio-economic activities to expand their rights and interests (Jin, 2013). Therefore, there is a need for an empirical study on how the use of digital smartphones affects the psychology of individuals, beyond the accessibility gap issue.

In recent years, with the global increase in smartphone use, studies on the relationship between this usage and emotional risk behaviors, such as depression, anxiety, and suicide-related behaviors, have been continually conducted (Lemola et al., 2015; Sueki, 2015; Twenge et al., 2018). Previous research on people with disabilities has confirmed that digital use influences life satisfaction and satisfaction with policies (Lee and Lee, 2018; Hwang, 2019). In a study that investigated the relationship between social media use and well-being in people with physical disabilities, it was reported that the higher the intensity of SNS use and online community use, the lower the level of depression through intervention tools and information support. It was reported that social media use played a positive role in building social support and strong psychological tendencies (Lee and Cho, 2019). In other words, there is a possibility that people with disabilities experience a positive impact on their lives through online activities.

Studies involving Internet use and individuals with visual impairments have generally focused on issues related to barriers to access and use (Williamson et al., 2001; Gerber, 2003). Among these barriers are the difficulties associated with accessibility, cost, and assistive technology; while the perceived benefits of using the Internet include access to new information, ability to use the Internet in the workplace, and improved social participation. However, the relationship between Internet use and the psychosocial well-being of individuals with visual impairments has not yet been investigated. Initially, visually impaired people could not use mobile phones for other purposes than making calls; however, with the advent of the iPhone in 2009 and the improvement of services such as the voice over function, people with visual impairments were able to expand their mobile phone usage beyond just making phone calls. However, studies related to the use of smartphones among people with visual impairment have not been actively conducted. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the impact of smartphone use on the lives of people with visual impairment and its effect on negative emotions in order to obtain basic data to plan future mobile device-related research projects for this population. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the relationship between the degree of use of smartphones and negative emotions in people with visual impairment.

Materials and Methods

Data

This study utilized the data from the 2016 Internet Overdependence Survey conducted by NIA from September to November 2016 in South Korea. The survey covered a sample of 24,386 people (100,000 households) aged between 3 and 69, who resided in 17 cities and provinces nationwide, with a resulting sampling error of ±0.63 at a 95% confidence level. This study analyzed a subset of the overall data, covering 30 people with visual impairments. For the survey, a trained professional investigator personally visited the sample households and wrote down the subject’s responses to each question. Table 1 summarizes the general characteristics of the participants.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. General characteristics of people with visual impairment.

Measure

The purpose of smartphone use was measured by classifying it into information search, leisure, communication, and online transactions, and using a seven-point Likert scale. Information search comprised searching for information related to news, academic/business, education/learning, product/service, and traffic/location. Leisure was defined as the use of smartphones for games, adult content, movies, TV and video content, music, e-books, web cartoons and web novels, and speculative games (sports betting, online gambling, etc.). Communication covered the use of e-mail, messenger, and SNS. Lastly, online transactions covered product/service purchases and product/service sales.

Negative emotions can be defined in various ways. The questions related to negative emotions presented in representative emotion scales are as follows. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et al., 1988) includes questions with negative emotions such as “frightened,” “hostile,” “nervous,” “sensitive,” “impatient,” “painful,” “broken heart,” “guilty,” and “shameful.” The Intensity and Time Affect Scale (ITAS; Diener et al., 1995) includes negative emotions such as “fear,” “anger,” “irritation,” “anxiety,” “worry,” “guilty,” “shame,” “disgusting,” “regret,” “sadness,” “loneliness,” “unhappy,” and “depression.” The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE; Diener et al., 2009) includes negative emotions such as “sad,” “unpleasant,” “bad,” “negative,” “afraid,” and “angry.”

The emotional problems experienced by people with visual impairments were measured by a scale developed by National Information Society Agency (2019). This scale includes questions aimed at measuring emotions similar to the questions suggested by the emotion measurement tools used in previous research. The Cronbach’s α was reported as.880 (Bae, 2015). The emotional mood in the respondent’s daily life was assessed through several statements. The statement “I am depressed and de-motivated” was used to measure depression, “I am anxious” was used to measure anxiety, and “I am lonely” was used to measure loneliness. The responses to these statements were measured on a 4-point rating scale where one represented “I do not feel like this at all” and four represented “I feel this way often.”

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of people with visual impairment. A one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to check whether the continuous data used in our study was normally distributed, which is a prerequisite for conducting parameter estimations. Negative emotions such as depression, anxiety, and loneliness were not normally distributed (p < 0.05). In terms of smartphone use purposes, information search, leisure, and communication use were found to be normally distributed (p > 0.05) while the degree of online transaction utilization was not normally distributed (p < 0.05). In regression analysis, since both the independent and the dependent variables must follow normal distributions, this study conducted a partial least squares (PLS) regression analysis.

Interpretation of PLS analysis results can determine the magnitude of influence through variable importance in the projection (VIP). In general, if the VIP value is close to or exceeds 1, the coefficient of the variable can be considered statistically very significant. Even a VIP of 0.8 or higher would imply that the variable plays a significant role in estimating the causal relationship (Nash and Chaloud, 2011). This study used an empirical criterion that if the VIP value of a particular variable was less than 0.8 and the absolute value of all regression coefficients was very small (close to 0), it could be removed as a meaningless explanatory variable when extracting latent factors or estimating the causal relationship (Sawatsky et al., 2015). This study applied a PLS regression analysis using five potential factors, which are basic set values, to observe the change in explanatory power of the derived model according to a change in the number of potential factors. The explanatory power of the model can be determined by the cumulative y variance of the response variable Y. This explanatory power generally increases as variables are added until a specific point where the explanatory power decreases upon adding the next variable. This point is deemed as the cutoff and the number and specific factors included until this newly added variable are used to define the statistical characteristics of the model (Sawatsky et al., 2015).

All analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) at a significance level of α = 0.05.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study did not require formal ethical approval under national laws. It used publicly available data from NIA, which did not contain any personally identifiable data. Ethical and governance approvals were granted by the Ministry of Science and ICT in South Korea. All participants gave written informed consent for participation before completing the survey.

Results

Explained Variance in Negative Emotion

Table 2 shows the effect of smartphone usage on the three negative emotions analyzed in this study.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Explained variance in negative emotions.

As shown in Table 2, the variance of the explanatory variables through each latent factor (Cumulative X Variance) was analyzed to explain 72.3% of the variance of all nine explanatory variables through five latent factors in depression, 73.6% in the case of anxiety, and 74.1% in the case of loneliness.

The explanatory power of the model can be determined by the cumulative y variance of the response variable Y, and the difference in explanatory power was reduced upon adding the third latent factor; hence, the explanatory power at this point and the number of potential factors (two) were determined as the statistical characteristics of the model. The explanatory power of the model constructed to determine the influence of smartphone use on the negative emotion of depression was therefore, 19.2%, which corresponds to the second potential factor. Similarly, the explanatory power of the model constructed for the effect of smartphone usage on anxiety and loneliness can be interpreted as 24.4 and 34.5%, which correspond to the second and third potential factors, respectively.

The Results of PLS Regression Analysis

The models determining the effect of smartphone use on the negative emotions of depression and anxiety were analyzed based on the importance value of the second latent factor, while the model for loneliness was based on the importance value of third latent factor. Table 3 lists the resulting importance of the explanatory variables for each potential factor through the VIP values of the five potential factors.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The PLS regression analysis results.

As a result of the PLS regression analysis, the most important factor influencing the negative emotion of depression was leisure with the highest importance (VIP) of 1.694. Information search (1.489) and communication (1.347) were other factors that were considered important as their VIP values were 1.0 or higher.

Regarding anxiety, leisure was estimated as an important factor with the highest importance (VIP) at 1.608. Based on a VIP value exceeding 1.0, other factors deemed important variables were information search (1.297) and communication (1.608). In addition, the variables with VIP values between 0.8 and 1.0 were sex (0.837) and leisure (0.940).

Lastly, in the case of loneliness, the variable that was determined to be the most important influencing factor was online transactions, with the highest importance (VIP) at 1.824. Leisure (1.045) and income (1.139) were other important factors with VIP values exceeding 1.0. In addition, the variables with VIP values ranging between 0.8 and 1.0 were gender (0.823) and information search (0.902).

Discussion

To determine whether the use of smartphones affected negative emotions such as depression, anxiety, and loneliness in people with visual impairment, this study analyzed the data from the 2016 Internet Overdependence Survey of South Korea.

First, it was found that the use of smartphones for leisure, information search, and communication purposes by people with visual impairment significantly influenced their negative emotions. Regarding depression, the non-standardized coefficient of communication was negative (-) indicating that the more that smartphones were used for communication, the lower the negative emotion of depression. Second, the use of smartphones for information search and communication was associated with lower anxiety in people with visual impairment. Third, regarding the effect of the use of smartphones by people with visual impairment on the negative emotion of loneliness, it was found that income, leisure, and online transactions had significant effects. Among these, the coefficients for income and leisure were positive, indicating that the higher the income or the greater the use of smartphones for leisure, the greater was the negative emotion of loneliness. The coefficient of online transactions was negative indicating that the use of smartphones for online transactions was associated with lower loneliness levels.

Just as it cannot be denied that the Internet and the use of smartphones have made our lives more convenient than before, not all aspects of using smartphones have a positive impact (Demirci et al., 2015; Elhai et al., 2016). Studies that show that smartphone use is related to negative emotions such as depression and anxiety have been reported steadily. In particular, research results on the effect of problematic smartphone use have been reported (Rozgonjuk et al., 2018). Social smartphone use is negatively associated with anxiety and depression symptoms severity (Elhai et al., 2017). This indicates that using a smartphone for communication is associated with lower depression and anxiety. The aforementioned findings are consistent with the results of this study, which showed a negative relationship between the use of smartphones for communication and the negative emotions of depression and anxiety. A possible explanation for this negative relationship is that the proportion of people at risk of developing smartphone addiction among people with visual impairments (16.7%; National Information Society Agency, 2019) was lower than that of the total survey group (20.0%; National Information Society Agency, 2019). The use of online chat or instant messaging by people with visual impairment has been reported to have a positive effect on their psychological well-being while information retrieval has been reported to have a negative effect (Smedema and McKenzie, 2010). The social use of smartphones and the low ratio of addiction associated with their usage in people with visual impairment might have an effect on the negative relation between communication and depression and anxiety.

It has been argued that the use of social networks has a negative impact on emotions. An excessive use of Facebook not only caused a phenomenon of “Facebook depression” among teenagers (O’Keeffe and Clarke-Pearson, 2011), but the literature also uncovered a high correlation between the frequent use of Facebook and depression (Pantic et al., 2012; Oh et al., 2014). This is because many people participate in social comparison behaviors through social network sites like Facebook, and their behaviors are significantly influenced by such social comparisons (Zhang and Centola, 2018). SNS have also been shown to negatively affect an individual’s emotional state (Sagioglou and Greitemeyer, 2014). In other words, while communication through direct conversation on Facebook increases bonding social capital and reduces loneliness, the longer one uses Facebook without any interaction, the lesser the social capital and greater the loneliness (Burke et al., 2010). This is because information such as vacation photos of other people on Facebook induces envy in viewers, which in turn negatively affects life satisfaction (Krasnova et al., 2013). By replacing strong connections with weak connections through social media use and reducing direct face-to-face contact with people close to us, we become unhappy by creating emotions such as “alone while together” or “solitude in a crowd.” In the case of people who use the Internet for communication, it was reported that the depression score decreased at the follow-up after 6 months (Bessière et al., 2008). In addition, using the Internet for communication purposes is a predictor of low depression while using the Internet for purposes other than communication has been reported to predict high levels of depression and social anger (Selfhout et al., 2009). The results of this study, which showed that the use of smartphones for leisure and information search was positively related with the negative emotions of depression and loneliness among people with visual impairment, are consistent with these previous studies.

Information search can be motivated by the aim of reducing uncertainty when a problem occurs; it has been reported that provision of information relieves anxiety in situations such as when facing surgery (Sjöling et al., 2003). Moreover, the pursuit of security through information search can be an important issue in online health-related searches (Starcevic and Berle, 2013). Since previous studies are related to health-related information retrieval and hepatic anxiety, it is difficult to directly compare them with the results of this study; in this sense, this study can be said to be different. Therefore, further research on the relationship between the use of smartphones for information retrieval and anxiety is necessary.

Partial least squares regression analysis can capture the influence of factors regardless of the sample size. Moreover, since each independent variable is modeled using least squares, the analysis is free from the problem of multicollinearity. In addition, it has the advantage that the predictive power is superior to the principal component regression analysis because the dependent variable and the independent variable are considered simultaneously when the principal component is extracted. For all its methodological advantages, this study conducted a PLS regression analysis, using panel data with systematic sampling.

Nonetheless, this study has several limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small. Future research should increase the number of participants so that the effects of degree of smartphones use on negative emotions in people with visual impairment can be verified through various methods such as path analysis. Second, the questionnaire to measure emotional mood is too simple to capture all emotional well-being. The information available for this study was limited to what was provided by the panel data. In future studies, it is necessary to obtain more detailed information about relation between the degree of use of smartphones and negative emotions in people with visual impairment. Third, the data analyzed were from 2016. Although this is the most recent data on Internet use and negative emotions from the national information gap survey, as a result of improvements on the usage restrictions since then, the present impact on negative emotions may be less. Therefore, research is needed to assert the current relationship between the use of smartphone’s features and negative emotions.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://eng.nia.or.kr/site/nia_eng/main.do.

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

E-YP contributed to project administration, data analysis, and writing.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Bae, S. (2015). Causal relationships among family relationship, addictive use of smart-phone, and emotional problem: model verification for national adolescents. Inform. Serv. Policy 22, 36–46.

Google Scholar

Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., and Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high−technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 47, 115–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bessière, K., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., and Boneva, B. S. (2008). Effects of internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Inform. Commun. Soc. 11, 47–70. doi: 10.1080/13691180701858851

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. (2010). “Social network activity and social well-being,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA.

Google Scholar

D’Aubin, A. (2007). Working for barrier removal in the ICT area: creating a more accessible and inclusive Canada: a position statement by the council of Canadians with disabilities. Inform. Soc. 23, 193–201. doi: 10.1080/01972240701323622

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Demirci, K., Akgönül, M., and Akpinar, A. (2015). Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J. Behav. Addict. 4, 85–92. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Diener, E., Smith, H., and Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 130–141. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.130

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., et al. (2009). “New measures of well-being,” in Assessing Well-being: The Collected works of Ed Diener, ed. E. Diener (Dordrecht: Springer).

Google Scholar

Duplaga, M. (2017). Digital divide among people with disabilities: analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of internet use and activities performed online. PLoS One 12:e0179825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., and Hall, B. J. (2016). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., and Hall, B. J. (2017). Non-social features of smartphone use are most related to depression, anxiety and problematic smartphone use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gerber, E. (2003). The benefits of and barriers to computer use for individuals who are visually impaired. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 97, 536–550. doi: 10.1177/0145482X0309700905

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hwang, J. H. (2019). The effect of digital divide on life satisfaction of disabled people. Inform. Policy 26, 53–68. doi: 10.22693/NIAIP.2019.26.3.053

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeong, B., Lee, J. Y., Kim, B. M., Park, E., Kwon, J. G., Kim, D. J., et al. (2020). Associations of personality and clinical characteristics with excessive internet and smartphone use in adolescents: a structural equation modeling approach. Addict. Behav. 110:106485. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, S. (2013). An analysis on the trend of digital divide: case of Korea. J. Kor. Assoc. Region. Inform. Soc. 16, 161–188.

Google Scholar

Krasnova, H., Wenninger, H., Widjaja, T., and Buxmann, P. (2013). “Envy on Facebook: a hidden threat to users’ life satisfaction?,” in Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Wirtchaftsinformatik, Leipzig.

Google Scholar

Lee, H., and Lee, S. H. (2018). A study on the relationship between digital informatization level and policy activity satisfaction level of disabled persons. J. Digi. Converg. 16, 23–28. doi: 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.4.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. E., and Cho, J. (2019). Social media use and well-being in people with physical disabilities: Influence of SNS and online community uses on social support, depression, and psychological disposition. Health Commun. 34, 1043–1052. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1455138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lemola, S., Perkinson-Gloor, N., Brand, S., Dewald-Kaufmann, J. F., and Grob, A. (2015). Adolescents’ electronic media use at night, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age. J. Youth Adolesc. 44, 405–418. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0176-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nash, M. S., and Chaloud, D. J. (2011). Partial least square analyses of landscape and surface water biota associations in the Savannah River Basin. Int. Schol. Res. Notic. 2011, 1–11. doi: 10.5402/2011/571749

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

National Information Society Agency (2019). 2018 Report of the Digital Divide. Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning. Seoul: NIA.

Google Scholar

Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, E., and LaRose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.053

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O’Keeffe, G. S., and Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics 127, 800–804. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pantic, I., Damjanovic, A., Todorovic, J., Topalovic, D., Bojovic-Jovic, D., Ristic, S., et al. (2012). Association between online social networking and depression in high school students: behavioral physiology viewpoint. Psychiatr. Danub. 24, 90–93.

Google Scholar

Raghavendra, P., Newman, L., Grace, E., and Wood, D. (2013). ‘I could never do that before’: effectiveness of a tailored internet support intervention to increase the social participation of youth with disabilities. Child Care Health Dev. 39, 552–561. doi: 10.1111/cch.12048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rozgonjuk, D., Levine, J. C., Hall, B. J., and Elhai, J. D. (2018). The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week. Comput. Hum. Behav. 87, 10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sagioglou, C., and Greitemeyer, T. (2014). Facebook’s emotional consequences: why facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it. Comput. Hum. Behav. 35, 359–363. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sawatsky, M. L., Clyde, M., and Meek, F. (2015). Partial least squares regression in the social sciences. Quant. Method. Psychol. 11, 52–62. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.11.2.p052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Selfhout, M. H., Branje, S. J., Delsing, M., ter Bogt, T. F., and Meeus, W. H. (2009). Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety: the role of perceived friendship quality. J. Adolesc. 32, 819–833. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sjöling, M., Nordahl, G., Olofsson, N., and Asplund, K. (2003). The impact of preoperative information on state anxiety, postoperative pain and satisfaction with pain management. Patient Educ. Couns. 51, 169–176. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00191-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smedema, S. M., and McKenzie, A. R. (2010). The relationship among frequency and type of internet use, perceived social support, and sense of well-being in individuals with visual impairments. Disabil. Rehabil. 32, 317–325. doi: 10.3109/09638280903095908

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, A. (2013). Smartphone Ownership-2013 Update. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Google Scholar

Starcevic, V., and Berle, D. (2013). Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related Internet use. Expert Rev. Neurother. 13, 205–213. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sueki, H. (2015). The association of suicide-related twitter use with suicidal behaviour: a cross-sectional study of young internet users in Japan. J. Affect. Disord. 170, 155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suter, L., Waller, G., Genner, S., Oppliger Kleiner, S., Willemse, I., Schwarz, B., et al. (2015). MIKE-Medien, Interaktion, Kinder, Eltern: Ergebnisbericht 2015. Zürich: ZHAW, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-2007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., and Martin, G. N. (2018). Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among US adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 6, 3–17. doi: 10.1177/2167702617723376

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., and Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wiese, M., Martínez-Climent, C., and Botella-Carrubi, D. (2020). A framework for Facebook advertising effectiveness: a behavioral perspective. J. Bus. Res. 109, 76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williamson, K., Albrecht, A., Schauder, D., and Bow, A. (2001). Australian perspectives on the use of the Internet by people who are visually impaired and professionals who work with them. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 95, 690–701. doi: 10.1177/0145482X0109501107

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., and Centola, D. (2018). “How social networks shape social comparison,” in Social Comparison, Judgment, and Behavior, eds J. Suls, R. L. Collins, and L. Wheeler (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 1–26.

Google Scholar

Keywords: smartphone, people with visual impairment, depression, anxiety, loneliness

Citation: Park E-Y (2021) Relation Between the Degree of Use of Smartphones and Negative Emotions in People With Visual Impairment. Front. Psychol. 12:653796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653796

Received: 15 January 2021; Accepted: 19 April 2021;
Published: 10 May 2021.

Edited by:

Carina Soledad González González, University of La Laguna, Spain

Reviewed by:

Sharifah Munirah Syed Elias, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
Sandra Cano, Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaiso, Chile

Copyright © 2021 Park. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Eun-Young Park, eunyoung@jj.ac.kr

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.