ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Sec. Environmental Psychology
The Consequences of COVID-19 Toward Human Growth: The Role of Traumatic Event and Coping Strategies Among Indonesian Sample
- 1Family Empowerment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
- 2DPFA Academy of Work and Health, Leipzig, Germany
COVID-19 has brought a massive psychological impact on individuals' life. The current study sets a significant purpose to test the model whether post-traumatic stress and coping strategies affect stress-related growth regarding the COVID-19 event. One hundred and ninety-nine participants have participated in an online survey in the period of lockdown. The proposed hypotheses model is further tested using PLS-SEM. The first model explains a significant moderate, 46% amount of variance for stress-related growth. With gender as moderator, the second model explains a significant 29% amount of variance for stress-related growth, which is also moderate. This study shows that active coping strategies and positive affirmation significantly influence individual stress-related growth. The trauma event (COVID-19) does not significantly affect growth. Women experience trauma compared to men, besides active coping with the COVID-19 situation is higher in men than women. Using the Bio-centric perspective, having a positive connection through acceptance and awareness of the situation, self-care, and affective interaction with others would develop growth regarding traumatic situations. Further, interventions about coping skills and positive affirmations are essential to give, especially to vulnerable groups such as women.
COVID-19 cases were reported for the first time in December 2019 in Wuhan, China (Wang et al., 2020). Since then, cases have increased every day and peaked in late January to early February 2020 (World Health Organization, 2020a). On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially announced the Covid-19 outbreak as a global pandemic, after 118,000 confirmed cases and 4,291 reported deaths occurred in 114 countries (World Health Organization, 2020a,b). An increase in the number of cases also occurred in Indonesia. Starting from July 28, 2019, Indonesia's COVID cases reached 102,051 people identified as having positive COVID-19, 60,539 of them recovered, and 4,901 died (Gugus Tugas Penanganan COVID-19 [Task Force for the Acceleration of Handling COVID-19], 2020). Ranks first in the highest confirmed cases of contracting countries in Southeast Asia, followed by the Philippines with 63,001 cases (Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia [Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia], 2020). Based on official data presented on the Ministry of Health website on July 19, 2020, the number of positive confirmed cases has reached 13,876,441 with 593,087 deaths (4.3%), and the number of countries affected as many as 215 countries. Meanwhile, the number of positive confirmed cases in Indonesia has reached 84,882 cases, with a total of 4,016 deaths, so the percentage of fatalities is 4.7%. Indonesia ranks first in the highest confirmed cases of contracting countries in Southeast Asia, followed by the Philippines with 63,001 cases (Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia [Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia], 2020).
The disease is spreading rapidly throughout the world due to the unique nature of the COVID-19 virus, genetic diversity, highly contagious, easy to apply, and relatively unaffected by climate variations (Mackenzie and Smith, 2020). The increasing number of cases occurred very significantly globally, reaching 16,301,736 with a mortality rate of 650,069 in 216 countries in July 2020 (World Health Organization, 2020b). An increasing number of cases also occur in Indonesia. As of July 28, 2019, COVID-19 cases in Indonesia reached 102,051 people who were positively identified as having COVID, 60,539 of them recovered, and 4,901 died (Gugus Tugas Penanganan COVID-19 [Task Force for the Acceleration of Handling COVID-19], 2020). Problems arising from the presence of COVID-19 have various psychological impacts on society. Banerjee (2020) mentioned several mental health challenges experienced by the community, including panic, phobia, anxiety, sleep disorders, and dissociative symptoms.
As the number of positive confirmed cases and death rates related to COVID-19 increases, their effects on individuals and society's psychological and economic conditions also increase (Boyraz and Legros, 2020). Psychologically, the pandemic condition is scientifically proven to cause anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, as well as to bring about depression (Bo et al., 2020; Boyraz and Legros, 2020; Ho et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2020; Shigemura et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). Surveys conducted weekly by the City University of New York (CUNY) since March 13, 2020, indicate that many New Yorkers experience a variety of anxiety-related to pandemics such as infected anxiety, social isolation, job loss, inability to pay bills, and so on. Most are also related to post-traumatic stress and other mental health disorders (CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, 2020).
Another study conducted in China involving 1,210 respondents from 194 cities showed that 16.5% of respondents reported experiencing depressive syndrome at moderate to severe levels. Meanwhile, 28.8% experienced levels of anxiety symptoms at moderate to intense levels. At the same time, 8.1% of respondents indicated that stress levels were average to severe. Based on this research, respondents of the female sex, respondents with student status, and respondents with certain physical symptoms and low health levels show higher stress levels, anxiety, and depression (Wang et al., 2020). In line with these results, research conducted on 1,115 respondents in Turkey also showed the effects that COVID-19 influenced psychological conditions, including feelings of depression, loneliness, fear of death, lack of hope, sadness, anxiety about the future, and feelings of worthlessness (Ustun, 2020).
Traumatic events can impact individual lives, such as stress levels that affect daily life (Ponnamperuma and Nicolson, 2018). The accumulation of stress levels, in the long run, will have an impact on mental health problems and the functioning of the individual. In adolescents, traumatic events impact the emergence of fear and worry about getting the label “abnormal” or different from their peers. Exposure to trauma experienced by adolescents can affect the environment's withdrawal to encourage the emergence of destructive behaviors (National Child Traumatic Stress Network, 2010). Not only that, while growing up, traumatic events can also have an impact on the process of forming self-identity (Waterman, 2020). For example, obstacles experienced by individuals in decision making. Individuals who have experienced trauma may consider or postpone the decision so that this process hinders the formation of the individual's self-identity.
Pandemic has been proven to have a traumatic effect on humans. Fear of death for both self and family is one of the reasons for the emergence of trauma in individuals during the pandemic (Murphy and Moret-Tatay, 2021; Pérez-Mengual et al., 2021). In addition, the lockdown policy creates its own stressor due to limited social activities (Burrai et al., 2020; Roma et al., 2020).
The result can be different in each individual, influenced by several factors such as age (Bonanno, 2004; Lee et al., 2007; Yip et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2020), gender (Mak et al., 2010; Lai et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020), as well as the presence of risk factors and protective factors (Boyraz and Legros, 2020).
Gender influences individual coping strategies (Mohiyeddini et al., 2013). Gender differences between men and women show different reactivity and responses in dealing with stressors (Verma et al., 2011). Research conducted by Deng et al. (2016) shows that men more often have intense emotional experiences while women have stronger emotional expressivity. Although men experience intense emotions, gender stereotypes allow them not to express themselves honestly (Deng et al., 2016).
Although traumatic events often harm individuals, many studies have shown that traumatic events can also broaden one's perspective, improve their ability to overcome problems, develop personal and social skills. Some changes that occur after these stressful events are often referred to as stress-related growth (Park and Fenster, 2004; Kesimci et al., 2005; Amaral et al., 2013; Macdonald, 2019). After a person experiences stress, the change that occurs is a resilient response (Zautra and Reich, 2011). The mechanism by which a person can grow after facing a stressful situation is often explained by a cognitive coping approach (Park and Fenster, 2004), where individuals can attempt to analyze the positive meaning of stressful events experienced (Solcova and Tavel, 2017). Furthermore, Stueck (2021) stated that moral priority should be given to the survival of individual living beings on pandemic based on the biocentric health management approach. There are six biocentric fields of action during and after pandemics to overcame resilient response and to protect the connection of humans namely maintainance affective communication, maintenance of lively corporeality, contact with one's own identity and inner oriented self-reflexion together with others, construction of life sense and expression of life potentials, expansion of consciousness and perception of the wholeness, and development of ecological awareness and sustainable biocentric lifestyles and attitudes (Stueck, 2021).
In addition, various literatures have tried to develop various strategies for dealing with traumatic events during a pandemic. Ramkissoon (2020) exploring the interplay of relationships between place confinement, pro-social behavior, household pro-environmental behaviors, place attachment as a multi-dimensional construct and presenting their relationships to residents' wellbeing. Further, Majeed and Ramkissoon (2020) developed and propose a conceptual framework related perceived goodness of therapeutic landscapes, health and wellness consumption, place attachment, and re-visitation. In addition, Ramkissoon (2021) discusses COVID-19 place confinement as a context to deliver body-mind medicine interventions including psycho-social, psycho-educational, relaxation, and meditation.
The current study sets a significant purpose to test the model whether post-traumatic stress and coping strategies affect stress-related growth regarding the COVID-19 event. Specifically, the study posed the following hypothesis:
1. Post-traumatic stress has a negative and significant effect on stress-related growth
2. Coping strategies have a positive and significant effect on stress-related growth
a. Depressive strategies have a negative and significant effect on stress-related growth
b. Active coping strategies have a positive and significant effect on stress-related growth
c. Self-construction strategies have a positive and significant effect on stress-related growth
d. Religiosity and search for meaning strategies have a positive and significant effect on stress-related growth
e. Wishful thinking strategies have a negative and significant effect on stress-related growth
3. Gender moderates the relationship between post-traumatic stress, and stress-related growth
4. Gender moderates the relationship coping strategies, and stress-related growth
Materials and Methods
The Current Study
The current study aimed to test the model of whether post-traumatic stress and coping strategies affect stress-related growth regarding the COVID-19 event. Specifically, gender moderates the relationship between post-traumatic stress, and stress-related growth. We expect post-traumatic stress experienced by individuals is determined by gender in generating stress-related growth. Variations in individual post-traumatic stress levels are determined by gender which then affects their stress-related growth. We hope that the study can provide significant information about the role of traumatic events and coping strategies to overcome the psychological impact of COVID-19 and promote human growth through a comprehensive bio-centric approach.
We collected online questionnaires administered through an online platform with google form during the third week of the COVID-19 and stay-at-home guidance in Indonesia. One hundred nineteen participants were given research information sheets and informed consent to be signed before filling out the questionnaire. Each participant could not fill out the questionnaire multiple times due to has been given a special code. This study was conducted via electronic to prohibited face-to-face contact—the sampling method used non-probability sampling with convenience sampling. The research project to collecting data approval was obtained from the Institutional Board, to which the first author is belonging.
Based on Table 1, of the 119 participants, 103 (86.55%) were women and had a mean age of 19.94 years (range 18–≥36). Most of them were single (94.96%), undergraduate students (92.44%), and unemployed (81.51%).
Sociodemographic information such as gender, age, level of education, and marital status was obtained using a self-report questionnaire.
The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) was initially developed by Weiss (2007) to assesses the experience of post-traumatic symptoms such as intrusion (dreams about the event), avoidance (an effort to avoid reminders of the event), and hyper-arousal (feeling watchful and on guard). It comprises 22 items with participants rate on five on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) to the extent to which each item applies to their experiences during the preceding seven days. Instructions were modified such that participants are asked about the distress caused by the COVID-19 circumstances—a higher total score indicating more post-traumatic symptoms. Cronbach's alpha is reported as 0.85.
Stress-Related Growth (SRG) was measured through the 15-item (Park et al., 1996; Cohen et al., 1998). The scale is a measure of post-traumatic growth in which participants rated how much they changed due to their most stressful event by giving the response range from 0 (no changes at all) to 6 (completely changes). All items were worded in a positive direction, for example: “I learned to be nicer to others,” “I learned that there are more people who care about me than I thought.” Higher scores indicate higher levels of growth. Cronbach's alpha is reported as 0.94.
Freiburg Questionnaire of Coping with Illness (FQCI) or Freiburger Fragebogen zur Krankheitsverarbeitung (FKV) was measured through the 35-item (Muthny, 1989). The FKV is measuring coping strategies that take into five coping subscales: Depressive coping, Active problem-focused coping, Distracting and self-encouragement, Religious faith and searching for the meaning of the illness, and Denying and wishful thinking. Items can be answered on a five-point Likert-scale (from 1 = “Applies not at all”, five = “Applies very much to me”). A mean value for each subscale is computed. Higher scores represent more use of the particular coping style. Cronbach's alpha is reported as 0.83.
All questionnaires used in this study through a scale adaptation processes including forward translation, data synthesis, backward translation, expert committee review and pretesting (Heggestad et al., 2019).
The analysis using WarpPLS 5.0, which is a structural equation modeling (SEM) software. It employs the Partial Least Squares (PLS) method that it can refer to it as PLS-SEM. In this study, we have carried out our model in two stages: (1) Examining the measurement model's reliability and validity. It can see from the factor loading value. Indicators are considered valid if they have a factor loading value >0.5. It can be concluded that the measurement meets the convergent validity criteria (Chin, 1998); (2) Hypothesis testing by analyzing the structural model.
This study uses a convergent validity test to ensure that the indicator is a construct of the latent variable. Convergent validity can be seen from the correlation between the indicator score with the variable score. The indicator is considered valid if it has a loading factor value> 0.5. From Table 2, it can show for FKV, three items (FKV25, FKV 27, and FKV 35) were dropped. This fall indicator will subsequently not be used in the calculation of the model. There were no dropped items from IES and SRG. Also, it can be seen that the composite reliability value on the variables of post-traumatic event, coping strategies, and stress-related growth are all >0.7, which is satisfied (Chin, 1998). Further, the AVE values on all variables are >0.5. The construct validity test is to ensure that the indicator is indeed extracted from its latent variable. Thus, concluded the indicators used in this study had met discriminant validity. This shows that the variables are consistent and can be used further for hypothesis testing.
Structure Model Testing
Testing the model's structure through the R Square test and Path Coefficients will be the basis for hypothesis testing. Figures 1, 2 presents the estimates obtained via PLS-SEM analysis. The model explains a significant moderate, 46% amount of variance for stress-related growth. With gender as moderator, the model presents a significant 29% amount of variance for stress-related growth, which is also moderate (Chin, 1998). It has shown the PLS path coefficients and the corresponding p-values for the model in Tables 3, 4. A traumatic event's impact does not have a significant effect on stress-related growth, that hypothesis 1 is rejected.
In partial, the links APC → SRG (β = 0.20, p < 0.01), DSC → SRG (β = 0.47, p < 0.01) are positively related. Thus, based on beta values and corresponding p-values, hypotheses 2b and 2c were accepted. The event's impact, depressive processing, Religiosity, and search for meaning, and wishful thinking, do not have a significant effect in this model (see Table 3).
Next, the links FKV → SRG (β = 0.53, p < 0.01) are shown positively related. Hypothesis 2 is accepted.
Hypothesis 3 and 4 were tested for the moderation effect of gender on the path impact of the traumatic event and stress-related growth and coping strategies and stress-related growth (see Figure 2). Both do not significantly affect this model, so hypotheses 3 and 4 were rejected (see Table 4).
The effect size for each path model can be determined by calculating Cohen's f 2. Based on the f 2 value, the omitted construct's effect size for a particular endogenous construct can be defined such that 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 represent small, medium, and large effects, respectively (Cohen, 1988). In Table 5, the small effect size on SRG was found in APC (0.077), RM (0.03), Gender*IES (0.02), and Gender*FKV. Further, the medium effect size on SRG was found in DSC (0.28) and FKV (0.30).
Additional analysis was conducted to examine differences in research variables based on gender. An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare all variables on gender. Based on Table 6, there was a significant difference for IES, 2.09(117), p < 0.00, women scored higher on traumatic event (M = 41.71, SD = 0.89) compared men (M = 36.50, SD = 2.49). Further, men indicated scored higher on active coping strategies (M = 29.98 SD = 0.30) compared women (M = 22.81, SD = 1.21); 205(117), p < 0.00.
This study found that participants were exposed to trauma from the emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak in Indonesia. Inconsistent with some other studies (Siqveland et al., 2015; Zieba et al., 2019), trauma condition scores do not significantly affect the stress-related growth experienced by individuals. This is because the emergence of growth requires gradual cognitive processes and perceived traumatic experiences.
Furthermore, Brooks et al. (2016) revealed that strategic social support and coping stress allow trauma or life burdens experienced not to predict growth in participants. In line with this opinion, this study found that participants' coping significantly affected the emergence of stress-related growth. Machado et al. (2020) stated that habitual use of coping strategies is important part of the treatment in posttraumatic stress symptoms. Moreover, specifically, Girma et al. (2021) stated about Covid-19 Pandemic-Related Stress that coping strategies significantly helped patient with chronic disease. Coping strategies are significant predictors for mental health measures on traumatic events due to could improve positive thinking (Budimir et al., 2021) and resilience (Gori et al., 2021). Stress's positive or negative effects depend on coping strategies that individuals have in solving problems (Park et al., 2009). An experimental study conducted on 94 students showed that individuals' coping activities could increase individual growth, including generating positive thoughts (Park and Fenster, 2004). Individuals who use positive coping strategies tend to report high growth levels (Bi et al., 2016). Growth will impact improving personal skills and interpersonal relationships (Kesimci et al., 2005; Popa and Podea, 2013).
The coping process mechanism has an impact on one's growth after passing through an adverse experience. Research conducted by Wild and Paivio (2003) of 193 student participants related to post-traumatic growth (PTG) shows the results that active coping and subjective well-being affect the post-traumatic growth (PTG) subject. Meanwhile, research conducted on 256 people who survived the 2010 Haiti earthquake showed a significant positive correlation between post-traumatic growth (PTG) and active coping (Mesidor and Sly, 2019). This is also in line with Park and Fenster's research on 94 Psychology students who showed the results that both coping strategies and cognitive processes play a role in the occurrence of growth after stressful growth experiences. This study states that individuals' efforts to overcome their stressors determine the growth experienced (Park and Fenster, 2004). Supporting this statement, Amaral, in his research results, revealed that coping strategies when facing problems influence the increase in post-traumatic growth subjects (Amaral et al., 2013).
One of the positive coping strategies is self-encouragement and self-affirmation. Self-affirmation affects the openness and behavior of individuals (Stapel and van der Linde, 2011; Main and Dillard, 2012). Research conducted by Creswell et al. (2013) shows that self-affirmation can protect individuals from the adverse effects experienced by stress-related problem-solving. This research shows that individuals' chronic stress can interfere with their problem-solving performance, and self-affirmation can improve problem-solving performance under pressure. Self-affirmation protects individuals from the adverse effects of stress on problem-solving performance, even in situations of acute or ongoing stress. Self-affirmation can provide long-term influence on one's ability to grow and adapt to deal with problems that cause anxiety (Cohen and Sherman, 2014). In a study conducted on 80 student participants, self-affirmation is known to encourage someone to be more creative so they can find insight when facing stressful and stressful events in life. Furthermore, Self-affirmation can improve one's mental health condition (Creswell et al., 2013).
Furthermore, the women in this study were more vulnerable to trauma situations. This is supported by research that women are more sensitive to traumatic experiences (Stroebe et al., 2005; Rzeszutek et al., 2017). Dell'Osso et al. (2012) also reported that women significantly higher PTSD prevalence rates and post-traumatic spectrum symptoms than men. In addition, Gentry et al. (2007) reported that women has higher in overall perceived stress levels, but there was no difference in the experienced social stressors and health stressors between genders. The sensitivity of women causes the emergence of self-brooding rumination) and a lack of thinking about self-reflective rumination (Lund et al., 2010). Furthermore, Stroebe et al. (2005) allude to the tendency of men to be oriented toward cognitive activity, so that this allows men to be more adaptive in dealing with trauma and lead to growth.
This study shows that active coping strategies and positive affirmation significantly influence individual stress-related growth. The trauma event (COVID-19) does not significantly affect growth. We assumed it because the data collection process carried out when COVID-19 has just occurred so that the construction process of the event's meaning has not been produced.
Women experience trauma compared to men, besides active coping with the COVID-19 situation is higher in men than women. Herren et al. (2021) also shown that there are differences in coping strategies between men and women. Women are more likely than men to report negative affective outcomes from emotion suppression (Herren et al., 2021). Further, Gentry et al. (2007) showed that women were more likely to use adaptive coping strategies, whereas men were more likely to use maladaptive and avoidance coping strategies. Interestingly, the religious matter is not yet significant. We assumed when in the initial phase of the pandemic, individuals are still in a state of shock, so connecting pandemics with faithful things still difficult.
This study illustrates the importance of active coping and self-affirmation in dealing with adverse situations such as COVID-19. Interventions about coping skills and positive affirmations are essential for vulnerable groups such as the women population. The number of male participants are not equal to the number of women is a limitation in this study.
Future studies will undoubtedly benefit from longitudinal designs using more diverse samples. We plan to continue this research to make repeated measurements of trauma and post-traumatic conditions, explore more deeply growth factors regarding COVID-19, and broaden the study participants' demographic characteristics.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Faculty of Psychology, Diponegoro University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
DK: research design and manuscript writing, modeling, data collection, and data processing. MS: research design and manuscript writing. LA: manuscript writing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This research under the Health Cube Project was initiated by MS. Thank you to all the research colleagues around the globe who participated in this study. We are also grateful to our research assistants Nanda Erfani, S. Psi., Tsara Firdaus, S. Psi., and Valentino Marcel Tahamata, S. Psi, for their help during data collection.
Amaral, G., Bushee, J., Cordani, U. G., Kawashita, K., Reynolds, J. H., Almeida, F. F. M. D. E., et al. (2013). Stress-related growth: correlates and changes following a resilience intervention. J. Petrol. 369, 1689–1699.
Bo, H.-X., Li, W., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., Cheung, T., et al. (2020). Post-traumatic stress symptoms and attitude toward crisis mental health services among clinically stable patients with COVID-19 in China. Psychol. Med. 51, 1052–1053. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000999
Boyraz, G., and Legros, D. N. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and traumatic stress: probable risk factors and correlates of posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Loss Trauma 6, 1–20. doi: 10.1080/15325024.2020.1763556
Brooks, M., Lowe, M., Graham-Kevan, N., and Robinson, S. (2016). Posttraumatic growth in students, crime survivors and trauma workers exposed to adversity. Pers. Individ. Differ. 98, 199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.051
Burrai, J., Roma, P., Barchielli, B., Biondi, S., Cordellieri, P., Fraschetti, A., et al. (2020). Psychological and emotional impact of patients living in psychiatric treatment communities during covid-19 lockdown in Italy. J. Clin. Med. 9:3787. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113787
Cohen, S., Frank, E., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S., and Gwaltney, J. M. (1998). Types of stressors that increase susceptibility to the common cold in healthy adults. Health Psychol. 17, 214–223. doi: 10.1037/0278-6188.8.131.52
CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (2020). Report: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on CUNY Students. Available online at: https://sph.cuny.edu/life-at391sph/news/2021/03/03/report-impact-covid-cuny/
Dell'Osso, C., Carmassi, E., Massimetti, M., Corsi, I., Pergentini, F., Belatti, I., et al. (2012). Relationships between post-traumatic spectrum symptoms and age, gender and degree of exposure to the l'aquila 2009 earthquake. Eur. Psychiatry 27:1. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(12)75130-1
Deng, Y., Chang, L., Yang, M., Huo, M., and Zhou, R. (2016). Gender differences in emotional response: inconsistency between experience and expressivity. PLoS ONE 11:e0158666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158666
Gentry, L. A., Chung, J. J., Aung, N., Keller, S., Heinrich, K. M., and Maddock, J. E. (2007). Gender differences in stress and coping among adults living in Hawaii. Calif. J. Health Promot. 5, 89–102. doi: 10.32398/cjhp.v5i2.1235
Girma, A., Ayalew, E., and Mesafint, G. (2021). Covid-19 pandemic-related stress and coping strategies among adults with chronic disease in Southwest Ethiopia. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 17, 1551–1561. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S308394
Gori, A., Topino, E., Sette, A., and Cramer, H. (2021). Pathways to post-traumatic growth in cancer patients: moderated mediation and single mediation analyses with resilience, personality, and coping strategies. J. Affect. Disord. 279, 692–700. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.044
Gugus Tugas Penanganan COVID-19 [Task Force for the Acceleration of Handling COVID-19] (2020). Peta sebaran COVID-19. Available online at: https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran-covid19
Heggestad, E. D., Scheaf, D. J., Banks, G. C., Monroe Hausfeld, M., Tonidandel, S., and Williams, E. B. (2019). Scale adaptation in organizational science research: a review and best-practice recommendations. J. Manage. 45, 2596–2627. doi: 10.1177/0149206319850280
Herren, O. M., Agurs-Collins, T., Dwyer, L. A., Perna, F. M., and Ferrer, R. (2021). Emotion suppression, coping strategies, dietary patterns, and BMI. Eat. Behav. 41:101500. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101500
Ho, C. S., Chee, C. Y., and Ho, R. C. (2020). Mental health strategies to combat the psychological impact of COVID-19 beyond paranoia and panic. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore 49, 1–6. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202043
Jiang, H., Nan, J., Lv, Z., and Yang, J. (2020). Psychological impacts of the COVID-19 epidemic on Chinese people: exposure, post-traumatic stress symptom, and emotion regulation. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 13, 252–259. doi: 10.4103/1995-7645.281614
Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia [Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia] (2020). Situasi Terkini Perkembangan (COVID-19). 05 Mei, 17–19. Available online at: https://covid19.kemkes.go.id/download/Situasi_Terkini_050520.pdf (accessed March 11, 2021).
Kesimci, A., Göral, F. S., and Gençöz, T. (2005). Determinants of stress-related growth: gender, the stressfulness of the event, and coping strategies. Curr. Psychol. 24, 68–75. doi: 10.1007/s12144-005-1005-x
Lai, S., Ruktanonchai, N. W., Zhou, L., Prosper, O., Luo, W., Floyd, J. R., et al. (2020). Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions for containing the COVID-19 outbreak in China. medRxiv Preprint Server Health Sci. 585, 410–413. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.03.20029843
Lee, A. M., Wong, J. G. W. S., McAlonan, G. M., Cheung, V., Cheung, C., Sham, P. C., et al. (2007). Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can. J. Psychiatry 52, 233–240. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200405
Li, J. B., Yang, A., Dou, K., and Cheung, R. Y. (2020). Self-control moderates the association between the perceived severity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and mental health problems among the Chinese public. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370094/ Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17:4820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134820
Liu, N., Zhang, F., Wei, C., Jia, Y., Shang, Z., Sun, L., et al. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: gender differences matter. Psychiatry Res. 287:112921. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112921
Lund, D., Caserta, M., Utz, R., and De Vries, B. (2010). Experiences and early coping of bereaved spouses/partners in an intervention based on the dual-process model (DPM). Omega 61, 291–313. doi: 10.2190/OM.61.4.c
Machado, A., Volchan, E., Figueira, I., Aguiar, C., Xavier, M., Souza, G. G., et al. (2020). Association between habitual use of coping strategies and posttraumatic stress symptoms in a non-clinical sample of college students: a Bayesian approach. PLoS ONE 15:e0228661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228661
Main, J., and Dillard, A. (2012). Effect of Self-Affirmation on the Coping and Motivational System. Student Summer Scholars Manuscripts. Available online at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/sss/66 (accessed March 11, 2021).
Mak, I. W. C., Chu, C. M., Pan, P. C., Yiu, M. G. C., Ho, S. C., and Chan, V. L. (2010). Risk factors for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in SARS survivors. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 32, 590–598. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.07.007
Mesidor, J. K. K., and Sly, K. F. (2019). Religious coping, general coping strategies, perceived social support, PTSD symptoms, resilience, and post-traumatic growth among survivors of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. Ment. Health Religion Cult. 22, 130–143. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2019.1580254
Murphy, M., and Moret-Tatay, C. (2021). Personality and attitudes confronting death awareness during the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy and Spain. Front. Psychiatry 12:627018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.627018
National Child Traumatic Stress Network (2010). Early Childhood Trauma. Available online at: https://www.nctsn.org/resources/early-childhood-trauma
Park, C. L., Edmondson, D., and Blank, T. O. (2009). Religious and non-religious pathways to stress related growth in cancer survivors. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 1, 321–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01009.x
Park, C. L., and Fenster, J. R. (2004). Stress-related growth: predictors of occurrence and correlates with psychological adjustment. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 23, 195–215. doi: 10.1521/jscp.184.108.40.206019
Pérez-Mengual, N., Aragonés-Barbera, I., Moret-Tatay, C., and Moliner-Albero, A. R. (2021). The relationship of fear of death between neuroticism and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychiatry 12:501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.648498
Ponnamperuma, T., and Nicolson, N. A. (2018). The relative impact of traumatic experiences and daily stressors on mental health outcomes in Sri Lankan adolescents. J. Trauma. Stress 31, 487–498. doi: 10.1002/jts.22311
Qiu, J., Shen, B., Zhao, M., Wang, Z., Xie, B., and Xu, Y. (2020). A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen. Psychiatry 33, 1–2. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213
Ramkissoon, H. (2021). Body-mind medicine interventions in covid-19 place confinement for mental, physical, and spiritual wellbeing. OBM Integr. Complement. Med. 6, 1–16. doi: 10.21926/obm.icm.2102016
Roma, P., Monaro, M., Colasanti, M., Ricci, E., Biondi, S., Di Domenico, A., et al. (2020). A 2-Month follow-up study of psychological distress among Italian people during the covid-19 lockdown. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:8180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218180
Rzeszutek, M., Oniszczenko, W., and Firlag-Burkacka, E. (2017). Social support, stress coping strategies, resilience and post-traumatic growth in a Polish sample of HIV-infected individuals: results of a 1-year longitudinal study. J. Behav. Med. 40, 942–954. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9861-z
Shigemura, J., Ursano, R. J., Morganstein, J. C., Kurosawa, M., and Benedek, D. M. (2020). Public responses to the novel 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Japan: Mental health consequences and target populations. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 74, 281–282. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12988
Siqveland, J., Nygaard, E., Hussain, A., Tedeschi, R. G., and Heir, T. (2015). Posttraumatic growth, depression and posttraumatic stress in relation to quality of life in tsunami survivors: a longitudinal study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0202-4
Stapel, D. A., and van der Linde, L. A. J. G. (2011). What drives self-affirmation effects? on the importance of differentiating value affirmation and attribute affirmation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101, 34–45. doi: 10.1037/a0023172
Sun, L., Sun, Z., Wu, L., Zhu, Z., Zhang, F., Shang, Z., et al. (2020). Prevalence and risk factors of acute post-traumatic stress symptoms during the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. MedRxiv 15, 123–129. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.06.20032425
Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., McIntyre, R. S., et al. (2020). A longitudinal study on the mental health of the general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain Behav. Immun. 87, 40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.028
Weiss, D. S. (2007). “The impact of event scale: Revised,” in Cross Cultural Assessment of Psychological Trauma and PTSD, eds J. P. Wilson and C. S.-K. Tang (Springer Science + Business Media.), 219–238. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-70990-1_10
Wild, N. D., and Paivio, S. C. (2003). Psychological adjustment, coping, and emotion regulation as predictors of post-traumatic growth. J. Aggress. Maltreat. Trauma 8, 97–122. doi: 10.1300/J146v08n04_05
World Health Organization (2020a). Naming the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and the Virus That Causes It. Geneva: WHO. Available online at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(COVID-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it (accessed March 11, 2021).
World Health Organization (2020b). WHO Director-General's Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19-−11 March 2020. Geneva: WHO. Available online at: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-COVID-19–11-march-2020 (accessed March 11, 2021).
Yip, P. S. F., Cheung, Y. T., Chau, P. H., and Law, Y. W. (2010). The impact of the epidemic outbreak: the case of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and suicide among older adults in Hong Kong. Crisis 31, 86–92. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000015
Zautra, A. J., and Reich, J. W. (2011). “Resilience: the meaning, methods, and measures of a fundamental characteristic of human adaptation,” in Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping, ed S. Folkman (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 173–185.
Keywords: human growth, traumatic event, coping strategies, COVID-19, Indonesian
Citation: Kaloeti DVS, Ardhiani LN and Stück M (2021) The Consequences of COVID-19 Toward Human Growth: The Role of Traumatic Event and Coping Strategies Among Indonesian Sample. Front. Psychol. 12:685115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685115
Received: 24 March 2021; Accepted: 21 July 2021;
Published: 18 August 2021.
Edited by:Sabine Pirchio, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Reviewed by:Carmen Moret-Tatay, Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Spain
Haywantee Ramkissoon, University of Derby, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2021 Kaloeti, Ardhiani and Stück. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dian Veronika Sakti Kaloeti, email@example.com