Impact Factor 2.067 | CiteScore 3.2
More on impact ›


Front. Psychol. | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687623

Perceptions of control influence feelings of boredom. Provisionally accepted The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon. Notify me

  • 1Psychology, University of Waterloo, Canada
  • 2University of Waterloo, Canada

Conditions of low and high perceived control often lead to boredom, albeit for different reasons. Whereas high perceived control may be experienced as boring because the situation lacks challenge, low perceived control may be experienced as boring because the situation precludes effective engagement. In two experiments we test this proposed quadratic relationship. In the first experiment we had participants play different versions of the children’s game ‘rock-paper-scissors’ in which they arbitrarily won (intended to maximize feelings of control) or lost (to induce feelings of low control). Despite having only dichotomous conditions, participants reported experiencing a broad range of levels of perceived control. Consistent with our predictions, boredom was highest at low and high levels of perceived control (i.e., a quadratic relation between perceived control and felt boredom). Experiment 2 tested the notion that the mere prospect of gaining control may mitigate boredom. Participants given to believe (erroneously) that they could gain control over the game of rock, paper, scissors were less bored than those who believed there was no possibility of exerting control. This suggests that beliefs concerning prospective control, rather than a given level of perceived control per se, may predict engagement and boredom.

Keywords: boredom, Perceived control, challenge, engagement, Frustration

Received: 29 Mar 2021; Accepted: 10 Jun 2021.

Copyright: © 2021 Danckert, Struk and Scholer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. James Danckert, University of Waterloo, Psychology, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Ontario, Canada,