Impact Factor 2.990 | CiteScore 3.5
More on impact ›


Front. Psychol., 28 July 2021 |

Assessing Attitude Toward COVID-19 Vaccination in South Korea

Shiva Raj Acharya1*†, Deog Hwan Moon1† and Yong Chul Shin2†
  • 1Graduate School of Public Health, Inje University, Busan, South Korea
  • 2Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Inje University, Gimhae, South Korea

Vaccines are the most effective strategy to safeguard against COVID−19 and it is crucial to assess community acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. This exploratory study aimed to assess the attitude of immigrants toward the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines in South Korea. A web-based anonymous study was completed by 463 immigrants. The data were statistically analyzed using a logistic regression model and ANOVA test. On a scale of 0–6, the average attitude toward the COVID-19 vaccination was 4.17 ± 1.73, indicating generally positive attitudes. The proportion of the immigrants who were certain to get COVID-19 vaccination was 55.3%. Only 36.7% reported that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe. Of the immigrants, 72.6% showed high acceptance and 27.4% low acceptance toward the COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine safety concern was the major predictor for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Up-to-date, valid information on COVID-19 vaccine safety, and vaccine risk communication strategies are required to increase vaccine acceptability.


Vaccines are the most effective strategy to protect the population from COVID−19. It is critical to assess community acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination now since COVID-19 vaccination has started globally (Islam et al., 2021). Although data suggest that the approved vaccines are safe and effective, long-term effectiveness and side effects are unknown. Understandably, the general public are uncertain of the current vaccine’s acceptance (Mannan and Farhana, 2020; Machida et al., 2021). Immigrant groups are not homogeneous, and their experiences of and attitudes toward vaccines vary greatly. Globally, immigrants are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection due to factors such as ongoing stigma and discrimination, economic disenfranchisement, and barriers to public health care. Limited studies have looked at individual vaccine uptake results by minorities including associated factors with any differences in vaccine acceptance (Caserotti et al., 1982; Mannan and Farhana, 2020; Islam et al., 2021; Thomas et al., 2021).

Although the most efficient way of controlling the spread of the virus is to protect oneself from being exposed to COVID-19, it is very important to vaccinate the community’s vulnerable group, such as immigrants (Acharya et al., 2020; Mannan and Farhana, 2020; Lake et al., 2021). A study found that only 54% of the respondents said that they intended to have the vaccination (Lin et al., 2020). Furthermore, a global survey of potential COVID-19 vaccine acceptance showed that 48% of their study population were uncertain and unsure about the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination (Lazarus et al., 2021). These relatively low proportions of people willing to get vaccinated is a serious issue (Schaffer DeRoo et al., 2020).

Vaccination against COVID-19 is voluntary in Korea therefore it’s critical to assess the existing attitudes of specific communities in order to have a successful vaccine campaign. At the time of writing (February 2021) in South Korea, both the AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines have received approval and are currently in use in the country’s vaccination programme (Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, 2021). People’s attitudes and perceptions about COVID-19 are critical for government and policymakers in addressing many of the hurdles to vaccination in such a setting. Vaccine hesitancy may pose a significant barrier in the COVID-19 immunization campaign (Al-Qerem and Jarab, 2021; Bhartiya et al., 2021). However, herd immunity requires a certain percentage of the population to be vaccinated. This goal is unlikely to be achieved unless the immigrant community also gets fully vaccinated (COCONEL Group, 2020; Schaffer DeRoo et al., 2020). In Korea, the perspective on the COVID-19 vaccines has not been studied, and it is expected that vaccine-related attitudes will be very diverse based on demographic factors, ethnic group, knowledge regarding COVID-19 and the vaccine’s availability. COVID-19 vaccine risk communication during the vaccine distribution timeline, and prioritization of the group for vaccination programs, have been identified as a major concern around the world (Kerr et al., 2021; Warren and Lofstedt, 2021). To prevent differences in vaccination reluctance, different communication tools are necessary within and between communities (Larson et al., 2015).

Furthermore, immigrants encounter hurdles to adequate access to health care services due to risk communication in culture, language, and economic conditions which inadvertently influenced their attitudes toward vaccination. In the context of vaccine risk communication, COVID-19 risk communication has varied widely (Warren and Lofstedt, 2021). Since globally immigrants were blamed for the coronavirus transmission, risk communication plays an important role in any risk management plan, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic (Kerr et al., 2021; Thomas et al., 2021). Immigrants are unlikely to be well informed and tend not to access to health care enough leading to specific COVID-19 vaccination attitudes (Galanis et al., 2013). To date, there is no prior study on attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine among immigrants in South Korea. In this study, we analyze the attitude of immigrants toward the COVID-19 vaccination.

Materials and Methods

Setting and Sampling

This was a cross-sectional study conducted among 463 immigrants in South Korea through an anonymous internet-based survey. The study was conducted between 25 January and 10 February 2021. A semi-structured questionnaire was designed with a google survey tool and disseminated publicly on the various social platforms (Facebook pages/groups for immigrants, LinkedIn) and was also shared personally (WhatsApp, Viber, Email, KakaoTalk) with the study population. The survey questionnaire was conducted in the English language. The majority of the participants (421) responded through social platforms. Immigrants over 18 years old, living in Korea for more than 1 year and who were able to provide consent were included in the study. The sample size was calculated by using the formula: n = Z2pq/d2 (Hasan et al., 2021).

n- desired sample size for the study

Z- the standard normal variate which corresponds to 95% confidence interval

p- proportion of the estimated population = 50%

q- 1-p = 0.5

d- precision = 0.05.

As there is no study available on attitude toward the COVID-19 vaccines in South Korea focusing on immigrants, with a proportion (p) of 50%, at a confidence interval of 95% and a 10% non-response rate, a sample size of 424 was estimated. Our sample size exceeded this estimate. In total, 468 participants participated in the study, but only 463 participants provided the consent for the study.


Sociodemographic Variables

Participants reported their sex, age, vaccination history, marital status (single/married), region (Asia/Europe/Africa/North & South America), residential area (capital/non-capital), and living type (alone/with family), education status (college/university level) and income (<3000$/ > 3000$).

Attitude Assessment Toward COVID-19 Vaccination

The attitude section consisted of validated three-items (Hogan et al., 2020; Bhartiya et al., 2021; Islam et al., 2021; Seale et al., 2021; Verger et al., 2021) (e.g., The COVID-19 vaccines are safe; I will get the COVID-19 vaccine without any hesitation) and the response of each item was indicated on a three-point scale (0 = Disagree, 1 = Probably, and 2 = Agree). The scores obtained from all three questions per respondent were added to obtain the attitude score (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.76, range: 0–6). For the purpose of logistic regression, we further categorized the attitude scores based on the median to interpret the “COVID-19 vaccine acceptance” as high acceptance (≥4) and low acceptance (<4).

Data Collection and Statistical Analysis

The data were collected online due to the strict social distancing measures in effect at that time. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 23.0. Descriptive statistical analysis (means, standard deviations) was performed for basic information of immigrants and attitude responses. ANOVA test was performed to determine significant relations of the mean attitudes scores with socio-demographic information. Finally, logistic regression was used to investigate the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among immigrants categorized into low and high acceptance levels based on attitude scores. All statistical tests were considered significant at a 95% confidence interval with a P-value < 0.05. Ethical consideration was taken from the ethical review board of Inje University. Participants received electronic informed consent to complete the online questionnaire which appeared on the first page of the survey.


Among the 463 immigrants, most were above 25 years (81.6%), male (67.8%) and married (61.3%). Majorities of the immigrant (74.7%) were from Asian countries. More than half of the immigrants were living alone (55.9%) and had college or below levels of education (58.7%). The vast majority of participants (90.5%) reported they received all other recommended vaccines in their lifetime (e.g., measles vaccine) (Table 1).


Table 1. General characteristic of participants and distribution of each attitude items.

The mean score of attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccines was 4.17 ± 1.73 on a scale of 0–6. About a third (36.7%) of participants indicated that a vaccine developed during an epidemic/pandemic situation could not be considered guaranteed and reported that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe. Meanwhile, 7.8% disagreed with the statement that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe. More than half of the immigrants (55.3%) agree to be vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine without any hesitation whereas 64.8% of immigrants mentioned that they will surely recommend the COVID-19 vaccination to their family and friends (Table 1). The mean score of attitudes was significantly higher among immigrants who reported being not married (Table 2). Of the sampled population, 72.6% (n = 336) showed high acceptance and 27.4% (n = 127) low acceptance toward the COVID-19 vaccines. The Immigrants who agreed to the statement “vaccine developed during an epidemic/pandemic situation could not be considered guaranteed” were 1.7 times (95% CI: 1.084–2.673) more likely to get COVID-19 vaccination (Table 3).


Table 2. Group difference analysis with attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination.


Table 3. Logistic regression analysis with low and high acceptance toward COVID-19 vaccine.


Understanding the epidemiological aspects of disease control, as well as the efficacy and progress of the vaccination program, demands an understanding of the local population’s attitudes and practices toward the COVID-19 vaccines. Our study aims to highlight the attitude regarding the COVID-19 vaccines, and also the predictors of vaccine acceptance among immigrants in South Korea.

Our study shows more than half of the study participants (55.3%) were willing to take the COVID-19 vaccines. In comparison, a survey from China reveals only about 28.7% reported a definite intention (Lin et al., 2020). A study showed a higher COVID-19 vaccine intention in Malaysia (94.3%) (Wong et al., 2020) of which 48.2% reported a definite intention, Indonesia (67%) (Harapan et al., 2020) and Japan (67.1%) (Machida et al., 2021). Also, an online survey also found a higher vaccine intention in France (74%) (COCONEL Group, 2020), United States (74.1%) (Hogan et al., 2020) and Europe (73%) (Neumann-Böhme et al., 2020).

According to a global survey of 19 nations, 71.5% of the participants said they would get the COVID-19 vaccine if available (Lazarus et al., 2021) which is higher than the results of our analysis. This may be attributed to cultural differences between South Korea and the rest of the world (Lee et al., 2021). Vaccine acceptance may need to be improved further, as high vaccination coverage is needed to combat epidemics (Machida et al., 2021). Vaccine reluctance among not only the general public but also medical practitioners has become a concern in recent years. Vaccine reluctance varies by time, location, and vaccine type, and is affected by a range of factors (Caserotti et al., 1982; Machida et al., 2021; Verger et al., 2021). Therefore, to arrange promotional activities to improve vaccine acceptance, it is vital to ascertain vaccine acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines and the factors that influence it in each location.

A range of reports has shown that up to 40% of the general population had unfavorable views about potential COVID-19 vaccines (Bhartiya et al., 2021; Lake et al., 2021; Verger et al., 2021). One of the principal factors behind these attitudes seems to be a concern that the new vaccines will not be safe (Lin et al., 2020; Verger et al., 2021). In this study period almost three-quarters of the respondents (72.6%) reported high acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine which is considerably higher than the European study (48.6%) (Verger et al., 2021). In our work, the perception that vaccines developed in an emergency cannot be guaranteed safe appeared to be significantly associated with the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines (Verger et al., 2021). The key factor found to be consistent with COVID-19 vaccination acceptance was the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, which has also been documented in other research related to the new vaccine. The observed result indicates that these outcomes are reliable and, most importantly, that they encompass contextual cultural, educational, and social factors (Caserotti et al., 1982; Islam et al., 2021; Machida et al., 2021; Verger et al., 2021).

Even in well-established vaccination systems, vaccine reluctance remains a major obstacle to population vaccination. There may also be specific vaccine factors or misinformation that make a vaccine more or less acceptable to certain groups (Lazarus et al., 2021). Before and during vaccine rollout, practical ways to eliminate vaccination barriers in immigrant populations must be implemented, including effective communication and supervision. Cultural considerations, differing understanding and attitudes about disease causes, and healthcare access issues are all hurdles to vaccination faced by immigrant populations (Thomas et al., 2021). In the following periods, it is essential to regularly monitor the attitudes and practices of all specific groups of the community toward the COVID-19 vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized for disadvantaged populations due to the strong demand (COCONEL Group, 2020; Lazarus et al., 2021).


There are certain drawbacks to this research. Since it was a cross-sectional study, so the causality cannot be attributed to the findings in the regression models. This was a web-based analysis with the potential for bias. The findings of our study demonstrate immigrants’ attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine. This result might be different in the general population.


Interventional programs targeting vulnerable populations with a higher risk of vaccine reluctance are most crucial to minimize the poor vaccination rates. Nevertheless, this is the first-ever study of immigrant’s perspectives about the COVID-19 vaccination in South Korea which will be very crucial for health policymakers and government to address proper vaccination among the vulnerable and neglected group of communities to mitigate the impacts of the pandemic. Adequate knowledge, positive attitudes and perceptions toward COVID-19 vaccination should be ensured to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Regular monitoring of the vaccination program and vaccination risk communication strategies are essential to ensure trust in COVID-19 vaccines. Furthermore, to minimize vaccine reluctance, a variety of vaccination methods targeting COVID-19 vaccine risk communication should be implemented adequately.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Inje University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

SA interpreted the study data, analysis, and manuscript writing. YS and DM performed research concept and literature discussion. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Acharya, S. R., Shin, Y. C., and Moon, D. H. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak and suicides in Nepal: urgency of immediate action. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry. Online ahead of print.

Google Scholar

Al-Qerem, W. A., and Jarab, A. S. (2021). COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and its associated factors among a middle eastern population. Front. Public Health 9:632914. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.632914

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhartiya, S., Kumar, N., Singh, T., Murugan, S., Rajavel, S., and Wadhwani, M. (2021). Knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in West India. Int. J. Commun. Med. Public Health 8:1170. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20210481

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caserotti, M., Girardi, P., Rubaltelli, E., Tasso, A., Lotto, L., and Gavaruzzi, T. (1982). Associations of COVID-19 risk perception with vaccine hesitancy over time for Italian residents. Soc. Sci. Med. 272, 113688–113688. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113688

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

COCONEL Group (2020). A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 769–770. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30426-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galanis, P., Sourtzi, P., Bellali, T., Theodorou, M., Karamitri, I., Siskou, O., et al. (2013). Public health services knowledge and utilization among immigrants in Greece: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 13:350. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harapan, H., Wagner, A. L., Yufika, A., Winardi, W., Anwar, S., Gan, A. K., et al. (2020). Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in southeast asia: a cross-sectional study in Indonesia. Front. Public Health 8:381. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hasan, H., Raigangar, V., Osaili, T., Neinavaei, N. E., Olaimat, A. N., and Aolymat, I. (2021). A cross-sectional study on university students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward COVID-19 in the United Arab emirates. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 104, 75–84. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0857

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hogan, C., Atta, M., Anderson, P., Stead, T., Solomon, M., Banerjee, P., et al. (2020). Knowledge and attitudes of us adults regarding COVID-19. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 13:53.

Google Scholar

Islam, M. S., Siddique, A. B., Akter, R., Tasnim, R., Sujan, M. S. H., Ward, P. R., et al. (2021). Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards COVID-19 vaccinations: a cross-sectional community survey in Bangladesh. medRxiv [preprint] doi: 10.1101/2021.02.16.21251802

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kerr, J. R., Freeman, A. L. J., Marteau, T. M., and van der Linden, S. (2021). Effect of information about COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and side effects on behavioural intentions: two online experiments. Vaccines 9:379. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040379

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (2021). COVID-19 Vaccine. Chungcheongbuk-do: Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

Google Scholar

Lake, E. A., Demissie, B. W., Gebeyehu, N. A., Wassie, A. Y., Gelaw, K. A., and Azeze, G. A. (2021). Knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 among health professionals in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 16:e0247204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larson, H. J., Schulz, W. S., Tucker, J. D., and Smith, D. M. (2015). Measuring vaccine confidence: introducing a global vaccine confidence index. PLoS Curr. 7:ecurrents.outbreaks.ce0f6177bc97332602a8e3fe7d7f7cc4. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.ce0f6177bc97332602a8e3fe7d7f7cc4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lazarus, J. V., Ratzan, S. C., Palayew, A., Gostin, L. O., Larson, H. J., Rabin, K., et al. (2021). A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat. Med. 27, 225–228.

Google Scholar

Lee, M., Kang, B.-A., and You, M. (2021). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in South Korea. BMC Public Health 21:295. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10285-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, Y., Hu, Z., Zhao, Q., Alias, H., Danaee, M., and Wong, L. P. (2020). Understanding COVID-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: a nationwide online survey in China. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 14:e0008961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008961

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Machida, M., Nakamura, I., Kojima, T., Saito, R., Nakaya, T., Hanibuchi, T., et al. (2021). Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines 9:210. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mannan, K. A., and Farhana, K. M. (2020). Knowledge, attitude and acceptance of a COVID vaccine: a global cross- sectional study. Int. Res. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 6, 1–23.

Google Scholar

Neumann-Böhme, S., Varghese, N. E., Sabat, I., Barros, P. P., Brouwer, W., van Exel, J., et al. (2020). Once we have it, will we use it? a European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Eur. J. Health Econ. 21, 977–982. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01208-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schaffer, DeRoo, S., Pudalov, N. J., and Fu, L. Y. (2020). Planning for a COVID-19 vaccination program. JAMA 323, 2458–2459. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8711

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seale, H., Heywood, A. E., Leask, J., Sheel, M., Durrheim, D. N., Bolsewicz, K., et al. (2021). Examining Australian public perceptions and behaviors towards a future COVID-19 vaccine. BMC Infect. Dis. 21:120. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05833-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thomas, C. M., Osterholm, M. T., and Stauffer, W. M. (2021). Critical considerations for COVID-19 vaccination of refugees, immigrants, and migrants. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 104, 433–435. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1614

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verger, P., Scronias, D., Dauby, N., Adedzi, K. A., Gobert, C., Bergeat, M., et al. (2021). Attitudes of healthcare workers towards COVID-19 vaccination: a survey in France and French-speaking parts of Belgium and Canada, 2020. Euro. Surveill. 26:2002047.

Google Scholar

Warren, G. W., and Lofstedt, R. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine rollout risk communication strategies in Europe: a rapid response. J. Risk Res. 24, 369–379. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1870533

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong, L. P., Alias, H., Wong, P.-F., Lee, H. Y., and AbuBakar, S. (2020). The use of the health belief model to assess predictors of intent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and willingness to pay. Hum. Vaccines Immunotherapeut. 16, 2204–2214. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1790279

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccine, attitudes, perceptions, vaccine acceptance, safety

Citation: Acharya SR, Moon DH and Shin YC (2021) Assessing Attitude Toward COVID-19 Vaccination in South Korea. Front. Psychol. 12:694151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694151

Received: 12 April 2021; Accepted: 07 July 2021;
Published: 28 July 2021.

Edited by:

Victoria Team, Monash University, Australia

Reviewed by:

Linda Min, Ulsan College, South Korea
Daniel Remondini, University of Bologna, Italy
Inayat Ali, Universität Wien, Austria
Ayoub Bouguettaya, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2021 Acharya, Moon and Shin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shiva Raj Acharya,

ORCID: Shiva Raj Acharya,; Deog Hwan Moon,; Yong Chul Shin,