Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol., 05 January 2023
Sec. Organizational Psychology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Psychology of Tourism Entrepreneurs View all 6 articles

Editorial: The psychology of tourism entrepreneurs

  • 1UniSA Business, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • 2Department of Tourism, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  • 3Nottingham University Business School Malaysia, University of Nottingham, Selangor, Malaysia

Editorial on the Research Topic
The psychology of tourism entrepreneurs

The COVID-19 pandemic has dealt a major economic blow to many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the tourism sector (Dvouletý et al., 2021). The UNWTO estimated a loss of US $1.3 trillion in tourism revenues, as well as 100-200 million direct tourism jobs at risk due to the pandemic. Many of these SMEs in the tourism industry are predominantly independently owned, founded, and driven by entrepreneurs (Hallak et al., 2012). As risk and uncertainty have become increasingly volatile during this period (Jalonen, 2012), many entrepreneurs operating in the tourism industry are increasingly finding themselves making decisions in difficult circumstances. According to Williams (2021), entrepreneurs are not passive actors in responding to such circumstance; instead, to survive and recover entrepreneurs often re-evaluate and become innovative by effectively utilizing their resources and array of competencies while learning to grapple with uncertainty. Therefore, innovative responses to the COVID-19 crisis are largely contingent on individual entrepreneurs' human and social capital as well as their individual cognitions and attitudes (Dakhli and De Clercq, 2004).

In this regard, a psychological lens has much to offer to enhance our understanding of how entrepreneurs in the tourism sector have responded to the COVID-19 crisis and developed recovery strategies (Gorgievski and Stephan, 2016). However, to date there remains a general shortfall of empirical studies that have adopted psychological frameworks to explore the decisions and behaviors of entrepreneurs in tourism sector specifically (Williams, 2021). This special issue responds to shortfalls in the literature by bringing together a collection of articles that focus on tourism entrepreneurs through psychological frameworks. The five articles in this special issue adopt different psychological theories ranging from social-cognitive perspectives, entrepreneurial learning strategies and ultimately values to enrich our understanding of tourism entrepreneurs and their responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Below we provide a summary of each of the five articles and their contribution to understanding the psychology of tourism entrepreneurs.

Based on sample of 644 small tourism business owners from Malaysia, Jalil et al. examine the impact of psychological capital on organizational resilience of such business owners. Their findings show that psychological capital plays an important role in enhancing coping strategies, and that coping plays a vital role for owners/managers in the rehabilitation of small businesses during or after a crisis, implying that the psychological capital of owners/managers is critical in building organizational resilience. Such findings broadly demonstrate the importance of concepts such as resilience and optimism among tourism entrepreneurs in coping with the effects of COVID-19 on the tourism industry.

In the second article, Xu et al. use Airbnb's crawler panel data such as listing information, customer reviews, and booking calendars from 348 hosts for 5 years to explore impact of start-up age on host performance growth in the sharing accommodation sector. Their findings show that the relationship between a host's start-up age and its growth is initially positive before an inflection point and then turns negative, representing a curvilinear relationship. Additionally, product supply was found to moderate this relationship. At the early stage, operating and cost pressures from product supply, and at the late stage, using product supply as a risk reduction strategy, weakens the influence of age on growth. Collectively, Xu et al.'s study highlights the significance of the entrepreneurial learning from experience for entrepreneurs.

Utilizing a mixed method participatory-action research approach, Ferreira et al. explored whether the extent to which farmers' intention to be involved in tourism micro entrepreneurial activities is influenced by their social capital. A key finding in their study was that only tourism micro entrepreneurial self-efficacy had a significant relationship with entrepreneurial intention. This led the researchers to conclude that farmers' perceived efficacy in understanding the industry's regulation or getting adequate liability coverage does not significantly affect their intention to engage in farm tourism enterprise. Such a finding supports earlier evidence regarding the importance of individual cognitions in determining one's intentions to engage in entrepreneurial activities.

The fourth article by Quan et al. seeks to understand the fundamental perceptions of Chinese travelers' intentions of using vaccine passports. They find that the perceived usefulness of vaccine passports by travelers has significant positive effects on their attitudes toward travel abroad and attitude toward domestic travel. Although not examining tourism entrepreneurs directly, their findings have important implications on how tourism entrepreneurs can begin the recovery process during COVID-19. Specifically, the findings suggest the importance of individual entrepreneurs' ability to continuously scan their environment for opportunities and to provide innovative solutions that can gain consumers' trust in the face of uncertainty is vital to crisis recovery.

The final article in this special issue by Khan et al. takes an interesting approach to understanding how tourism entrepreneurs can potentially deal with the loss of employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on data from 842 front-line employees in Pakistan, Khan et al. explore the relationship between Organizational Hypocrisy and Job Embeddedness and whether Perceived Inducement Breach and Future Anxiety mediate this relationship. They find that while organizational hypocrisy increases job embeddedness, it has negative psychological and emotional consequences through increasing Perceived Inducement Breach and Future Anxiety. Khan et al.'s study highlights the importance of tourism entrepreneurs in ensuring that their own individual values align with that of their employees through not only their words but also their actions. A miss-alignment can potentially lead to tourism entrepreneurs losing one of their most important resources and source of competitive advantage; their employees.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Dakhli, M., and De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study. Entrepr. Reg. Develop. 16, 107–128. doi: 10.1080/08985620410001677835

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dvouletý, O., Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C., and Mustafa, M. (2021). Entrepreneurship during the times of COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and consequences. J. Entrepr. Emer. Econ. 13, 489–496. doi: 10.1108/JEEE-09-2021-461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gorgievski, M. J., and Stephan, U. (2016). Advancing the psychology of entrepreneurship: A review of the psychological literature and an introduction. Appl. Psychol. 65, 437–468. doi: 10.1111/apps.12073

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hallak, R., Brown, G., and Lindsay, N. J. (2012). The Place Identity–Performance relationship among tourism entrepreneurs: A structural equation modelling analysis. Tourism Manag. 33, 143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.02.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jalonen, H. (2012). The uncertainty of innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J. Manage. Res. 4, 1–47. doi: 10.5296/jmr.v4i1.1039

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, C. C. (2021). Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on Europe's tourism industry: Addressing tourism enterprises and workers in the undeclared economy. Int. J. Tour. Res. 23, 79–88. doi: 10.1002/jtr.2395

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: tourism, entrepreneur, COVID-19, psychology, industry

Citation: Hallak R, Lee C and Mustafa M (2023) Editorial: The psychology of tourism entrepreneurs. Front. Psychol. 13:1119778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1119778

Received: 09 December 2022; Accepted: 22 December 2022;
Published: 05 January 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Jolita Vveinhardt, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania

Copyright © 2023 Hallak, Lee and Mustafa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rob Hallak, yes Rob.Hallak@unisa.edu.au

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.