Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol., 16 June 2023
Sec. Organizational Psychology
This article is part of the Research Topic Interpersonal Skills: Individual, Social, and Technological Implications View all 7 articles

Editorial: Interpersonal skills: individual, social, and technological implications

  • 1Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States
  • 2Department of Research and Development, Swiss Federal University for Vocational Education and Training (SFUVET), Renens, Switzerland
  • 3Department of Psychological Science, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA, United States

Introduction

Although interpersonal skills are the touchstone of human social interaction, with hundreds of such skills identified, defining them has remained elusive. Yet, we know interpersonal skills when we see them in action all around us. Students who engage one another to support learning, work colleagues who collaborate productively, supervisors who mentor subordinates in ways that yield satisfaction and task performance, relationships between service providers and customers based on trust and mutual respect—in all these domains, interpersonal dynamics contribute to fulfilling social interactions between individuals and groups. Indeed, productive and meaningful social exchanges are a fundamental need that strikes at the core of what it means to be human (Huston and Burgess, 1979; Ryan and Deci, 2000; Erdogan and Liden, 2002). Our collective experiences of social isolation during the pandemic further underscores that interpersonal skills in everyday life are more important than ever. Therefore, so is research on this topic.

We bring together a collection of six articles that directly or indirectly explore interpersonal skills and dynamics in a variety of domains including educational settings, work settings, and customer service settings. Across these studies, interpersonal skills or interpersonal dynamics are investigated as antecedents, outcomes, mediators and moderators.

Interpersonal dynamics in education

Widespread use of social media has been associated with a number of developmental and mental health challenges for youth and adolescents (Twenge et al., 2019; O'Reilly, 2020) that can impair wellbeing even into adulthood. This has implications for developing and sustaining meaningful and healthy social relationships, with later potential impacts on employability at work. Serrano-Pintado et al. address this problem indirectly with an initial program evaluation study of interpersonal skills training for 51 adolescent teens in Spain ranging from 12 to 18 years of age. In their study interpersonal competence (social skills) is core to a structured intervention that aims to help young people reduce social anxiety and interpersonal difficulties. Social skills in this context includes interpersonal behaviors that enable students to express emotions and intentions, integrate criticism in a non-defensive manner, minimize interpersonal conflict, and enjoy mutually satisfying relationships. Their intervention demonstrates significant improvements in terms of anxiety reduction from improved self-assessments of assertiveness, interpersonal relationships, and confidence in public speaking. Their findings hold promise that such interventions and training may provide needed relief from the social skill deficits that may be associated with our social media obsessed culture.

Study-abroad experiences represent another educational context where interpersonal skills may be critical for adjustment and wellbeing in an otherwise novel and anxiety-inducing environment—residing in a foreign country where students may lack appropriate communication skills. Khukhlaev et al. investigate 337 international students studying in Russian universities to explore the predictive role of interpersonal mindfulness on intercultural communication effectiveness. In their study, interpersonal mindfulness is a metacognitive antecedent that includes self- and other-awareness in terms of emotions and emotional regulation, as well as intentions and sensitivity pertaining to nonverbal cues in communication. Specifically, they investigate interpersonal dynamics as a motivational frame (i.e., a mindset) to predict effective study abroad experiences. Consistent with anxiety uncertainty management theory, they found that reduced intergroup anxiety mediated the relationship between interpersonal mindfulness and intercultural communication effectiveness. This underscores the importance of a mindset that is attuned to interpersonal and social cues as a prerequisite for students who may aspire to study abroad, yet are naïve of the potential anxiety-inducing effects of such a novel experience.

Interpersonal dynamics at work

Interpersonal skills play a critical role in the domain of work, both in peer-to-peer relationships and in the supervisor-subordinate dyad (Beenen et al., 2021). Zhang et al. explore the impact of peer-to-peer feedback seeking behaviors on both task performance and workplace wellbeing for a sample of 327 teachers in China. At the core of their model is the quality of relationships between co-workers when seeking feedback. Specifically, robust interpersonal relationships between coworkers mediate the relationship between coworkers' peer-to-peer feedback seeking behavior, and both task performance and wellbeing. On the other hand, these same interpersonal relationships also can serve as a substitute for the benefits of feedback seeking behavior by mitigating (i.e., a negative moderating effect) their impact on performance and wellbeing. In other words, strong interpersonal relationships may be developed through feedback-seeking activities, yet they also serve to diminish the benefits of feedback seeking. This strikes at the core of how strong interpersonal relationships at work forge bonds of mutuality and reciprocity that may yield both enjoyment and performance at work.

The supervisor-subordinate dyad is critical, especially during the period of organizational entry known as newcomer socialization (Bauer et al., 2007). Of central importance in the supervisor-subordinate relationship is the quality of interpersonal exchanges. Deng et al. concentrate on interpersonal dynamics as both a predictor and a mediator. They distinguish supervisor-subordinate dyads focused on occupational skills (newcomer career mentoring), and those focused on interpersonal skills (newcomer psychosocial mentoring). In a study of 157 newcomers and 88 supervisors, consistent with social cognitive career theory, they found psychosocial mentoring predicted social integration and job satisfaction, while career mentoring predicted task mastery, performance and job satisfaction. These relationships were mediated respectively by newcomer social and occupational self-efficacy, and amplified by the learning adaptability of the newcomer. Their findings further reinforce the importance of high-quality interpersonal exchanges between subordinates and supervisors, especially when it comes to onboarding newcomers.

Interpersonal dynamics of mimicry in the customer and service-provider relationship

Mimicry and social learning represent an instinctive interpersonal dynamic that emerges at the dyadic level whereby the mimicker may convey an interpersonal connection to the mimickee. In the context of a customer and service-provider relationship, the later may serve in a mimicker role and the former in that of the mimickee. Kulesza et al. investigate a “chameleon effect” in this dyad whereby mimicry may facilitate service quality benefits for the customer and reputational benefits for the service provider. In two field experiments (n = 46 and n = 120), verbal mimicry by the service provider was associated with higher customer satisfaction and provider reputational indicators when compared to a control condition without mimicry. Importantly, the beneficial effects of mimicry spread over to the product and the whole organization, highlighting the marketing implications of the studies' findings. In interpersonal exchanges, mimicry may signal empathy or mockery. It therefore is critical for the mimickee to understand when the mimicker is sending true vs. false signals of liking and affiliation. Adequate amount and timing of mimicry may provide helpful cues for interpreting the true intentions of the mimicker (Kavanagh and Winkielman, 2016). The contextual cues and emotional states associated with both the displays and interpretations of mimicry are an interesting topic for future research.

Reflecting on the nature of social performance

Our final and most recent entry on this topic takes a step back to reflect on the nature of “social performance” as a quantitative effectiveness indicator of interpersonal exchange. In a review of the literature on social performance as a quantitative outcome, Wild et al. challenge the dominant paradigm of conceptualizing social performance as an analog to intellectual performance. After reviewing mainstream approaches to the assessment of interpersonal skills and social performance, and their related shortcomings, the authors propose a reconceptualization of social performance based on expertise, which integrates, among other factors, individual differences in abilities, skills, traits, and personal experiences relevant for social performance. Aligned with the assumptions of other approaches to expertise, such as in the domain of emotion (Hoemann et al., 2021), the authors recommend multimethod assessments that incorporate complementary features of social expertise and account for the dynamic nature of social performance. Wild et al. conclude by presenting an example of computational modeling in which several individual features (e.g., scores on emotional intelligence, empathy, interpersonal sensitivity) can be considered at the same time and combined into a representative response vector in a multidimensional social performance space. One of the advantages of this approach is it makes it possible to both identify a unique individual or signature profile based on a set of coordinates, as well as to group individuals with similar characteristics (or clusters) based on distance metrics.

Closing thoughts

Although these Research Topic papers make clear that interpersonal skills are important for effective performance across a variety of contexts, more research is needed as to which types of skills are most important in specific contexts and for specific outcomes. The concept of bandwidth fidelity suggests that the breadth (or specificity) of predictor and criterion should be congruent for stronger validities (Hogan and Holland, 2003). For instance, family-supportive supervision is more strongly related to work-family conflict than general supervisor support (Kossek et al., 2011). Which types of interpersonal skills are more strongly related to in-role performance vs. contextual performance vs. counterproductive work behavior, for instance, and how might this vary across settings? This is an important area for future research on interpersonal skills in organizations.

The healthy and productive interpersonal dynamics investigated in this Research Topic collection are both abounding and lacking all around us. Where they abound, we see students develop and learn, employees thrive, and customers satisfied. Where they are lacking, we see our fellow humans languish, lacking in kindness, empathy and civility, with their needs and goals thwarted. We hope this Research Topic articles inspires more research in this area to facilitate human social performance and thriving.

Author contributions

GB drafted and edited. MF edited and contributed comments on mimicry and social performance articles. SP provided future research directions. RR edited and provided relevant references. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., and Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 707–721. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beenen, G., Pichler, S., Livingston, B., and Riggio, R. (2021). The good manager: development and validation of the managerial interpersonal skills scale. Front. Psychol. 12, 631390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erdogan, B., and Liden, R. C. (2002). Social exchanges in the workplace. Leadership 56, 175–186.

Google Scholar

Hoemann, K., Nielson, C., Yuen, A., Gurera, J. W., Quigley, K. S., Barrett, L. F., et al. (2021). Expertise in emotion: a scoping review and unifying framework for individual differences in the mental representation of emotional experience. Psychol. Bull. 147, 1159–1183. doi: 10.1037/bul0000327

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hogan, J., and Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: a socioanalytic perspective. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 100. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huston, T. L., and Burgess, R. L. (1979). “Social exchange in developing relationships: an overview,” in Social Exchange in Developing Relationships, eds R. L. Burgess, and T. L. Huston (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 3–28. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-143550-9.50007-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kavanagh, L. C., and Winkielman, P. (2016). The functionality of spontaneous mimicry and its influences on affiliation: an implicit socialization account. Front. Psychol. 7, 458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., and Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: a meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Pers. Psychol. 64, 289–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01211.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Reilly, M. (2020). Social media and adolescent mental health: the good, the bad and the ugly. J. Ment. Health 29, 200–206. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1714007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M., Spitzberg, B. H., and Campbell, W. K. (2019). Less in-person social interaction with peers among US adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 36, 1892–1913. doi: 10.1177/0265407519836170

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: interpersonal skills, social performance, interpersonal mimicry, social relationships, interpersonal dynamics, interpersonal effectiveness

Citation: Beenen G, Fiori M, Pichler S and Riggio R (2023) Editorial: Interpersonal skills: individual, social, and technological implications. Front. Psychol. 14:1209508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1209508

Received: 20 April 2023; Accepted: 05 June 2023;
Published: 16 June 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Sukanlaya Sawang, Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2023 Beenen, Fiori, Pichler and Riggio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Gerard Beenen, gbeenen@fullerton.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.