- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
When faced with mental health concerns, help-seeking can be a useful means to seek and receive help from formal support sources—such as mental health professionals, as well as informal support sources—such as friends and family. Both the intention and tendency to engage in formal help-seeking are predicted by mental health literacy, self-stigma, and emotional intelligence; however, the role that each of these factors play in relation to informal help-seeking is less clear. The current study examined the predictive value of mental health literacy with respect to both formal and informal help-seeking intentions. Additionally, the current study explored the role of self-stigma and emotional intelligence as possible mediators of these relationships. Undergraduate students (n = 301) were recruited from a Western Canadian university and completed a series of online questionnaires measuring their formal and informal help-seeking intentions, mental health literacy, self-stigma faced when seeking help, and meta-mood, as an operationalization of emotional intelligence. Results indicated that mental health literacy was a significant positive predictor of formal help-seeking intentions, and that both self-stigma and meta-mood partially mediated this relationship. Furthermore, results showed that mental health literacy did not serve as a significant predictor of informal help-seeking, although mental health literacy did have a significant indirect effect on informal help-seeking, through the mediation of meta-mood. The importance of self-stigma and meta-mood in relation to mental health literacy are highlighted in terms of formal help-seeking outcomes, and the implications of these findings for informal help-seeking are discussed.
1 Introduction
In Canada, it is estimated that the lifetime prevalence of experiencing at least one mental illness is 50% by the age of 40 (Smetanin et al., 2011). Despite the large proportion of individuals facing mental health concerns, the use of formal mental health resources by Canadians is limited. For example, Stephenson (2023) found that only 16.8% of surveyed Canadians had reached out to a medical professional in the past year regarding their mental health. Even among Canadians who met the diagnostic criteria for a mood or anxiety disorder, only about half had reached out to a medical professional in the past year for mental health support, despite findings that the majority of individuals who have accessed professional treatment had their needs met through counselling (64.3%), information (82.3%), or medication (92%) (Stephenson, 2023; Sunderland and Findlay, 2013). Evidently, there exists a gap between those who need mental health support and those who access and receive professional mental health support (i.e., a treatment gap; Kohn et al., 2018; Keyes, 2007; Kohn et al., 2004).
This treatment gap is common among mental healthcare systems in North America which are underfunded and over-capacity (Knaak et al., 2017; Moroz et al., 2020; American Psychological Association, 2022). Nonetheless, proactively addressing known risk factors and promoting positive mental health in our communities can help reduce the burden on the healthcare system by preventing the onset of higher severity disorders (Gilmour, 2014; Kisling and Das, 2023). Although professional treatments are considered a quintessential method of supporting one’s mental health, informal social support may present a more accessible way to reduce the risk of developing harmful mental health outcomes; social support often serves as a protective factor against the onset and severity of many mental illnesses, as well as improving positive mental health outcomes and well-being (Levula et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2021; Southwick et al., 2005). For example, Dong et al. (2024) investigated the benefits of informal support for older adults and found that increased levels of contact and support from one’s children was a strong predictor of better mental health outcomes. A review from Lynch et al. (2023) found that informal support can either facilitate or hinder mental health outcomes and formal help-seeking, depending on the effectiveness of the support network and the quality of the interactions within it. These findings highlight that not all social support is helpful – its impact depends on the nature of the interactions rather than the amount of support alone. Therefore, understanding support from the perspective of the help-seeker is critical for accurately capturing the help-seeking experience and designing effective interventions. A comprehensive psychosocial framework should consider both individual experiences and environmental factors affecting support seeking (Biddle et al., 2007; Holden et al., 2012; Carpentier and Bernard, 2011; Nash et al., 2017). In the current study, considering that individuals may be relying more on social supports as a response to barriers in formal support utilization, it is important for research on help-seeking behaviors to parse formal help-seeking, such as therapy or treatment delivered by mental health professionals, and informal help-seeking, often provided by an individual’s personal connections.
Generally, help-seeking is a means to receive support and address support needs in response to emotional, behavioral, or cognitive concerns that threaten the individual’s wellbeing (Rickwood and Thomas, 2012; Leamy et al., 2011; Tew et al., 2012). In response to a mental health concern, individuals can seek out formal supports, which are often a paid professional service (Elkin et al., 1995). These resources may be more suited for the diagnosis and treatment of mental health symptoms and distress, including specific evidence-based interventions for mental illnesses and promotion of positive mental health (Elkin et al., 1995; Lauzier-Jobin and Houle, 2022). Mental health professionals vary in their effectiveness, which can be influenced by the alignment between the client’s specific area of concern and needs, types of treatment provided, competency of the professional, and available resources (Andrews, 1999; Elkin et al., 1995; Stephenson, 2023; Brewer et al., 2024). Despite this variability, most individuals within Canada who accessed formal supports felt that their mental health concerns were fully addressed (Stephenson, 2023), underscoring the value of formal supports in helping to address mental health concerns.
In contrast, informal help-seeking often refers to help sought through personal connections and can include friends, family, partners, and peers (Rickwood and Thomas, 2012). According to Lauzier-Jobin and Houle (2022), these personal supports tend to be less prepared for—and less knowledgeable about – how best to support individuals with specific mental health challenges. Despite this lack of formal training, informal support can provide emotional closeness, a sense of belonging, and a personal bond that may not be present in formal supports. Furthermore, informal helpers tend to have a pre-existing relationship with those that they help. In this dynamic there is higher reciprocity in help given and received, in addition to being more accessible than formal supports. Informal supports are, however, limited in the type of support they can reasonably provide, as they often do not have relevant training to address mental health concerns. Despite this, informal support has been associated with a general reduction in the odds of suffering from psychological distress, especially after experiencing distressing life events (Maulik et al., 2010; Scott et al., 2020). It is also associated with reduced symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (Bryant et al., 2017). Following an intervention for subclinical depressive symptoms, Yiu et al. (2025) found that emotional support from formal sources served as a greater predictor of reductions in depressive symptoms, whereas emotional support from informal sources served as a predictor of decreases in anxiety symptoms. While the methodology limits conclusions about how formal and informal support differentially benefited participants based on symptomology, the study highlights the distinct effects of each support type. The literature has identified the utility of peer support, specifically, which has been shown to be associated with increases in effective coping, self-reported recovery, and self-empowerment (Richard et al., 2022; White et al., 2020). A deeper understanding of peer support and other informal support mechanisms may help translate theoretical and empirical insights into a comprehensive operational framework to inform intervention implementation and use (Rickwood and Thomas, 2012).
While formal help-seeking has been established as one of the primary methods of addressing mental health concerns (Elkin et al., 1995), accessibility of formal supports complicates utilization. Significant barriers, such as affordability, cultural beliefs towards support, knowledge of supports, and ease of access and availability, can all inhibit formal help-seeking behaviors and intentions (Carbonell et al., 2020; Eisenberg et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2015; Moroz et al., 2020; Planey et al., 2019; Zimmerman, 2005). These same barriers, however, do not necessarily inhibit informal help-seeking, such as talking to a trusted friend (Saltzman et al., 2020). Additionally, the structures, goals, and expectations associated with formal supports are markedly different than those associated with informal supports (Lauzier-Jobin and Houle, 2022). In formal contexts, support is usually goal-directed, in which the helper is deliberate and plans their actions, interacting with the help-seeker in a way that facilitates progress towards a certain pre-determined outcome (e.g., reducing the severity of anxiety symptoms; Lauzier-Jobin and Houle, 2022). Thus, the structure of formal support centers around how to reach a certain agreed-upon outcome. In contrast, a mutual goal is not necessarily present in informal help-seeking. Hence, while formal help-seeking is the prototypical conceptualization of help-seeking for mental health concerns, this position may disregard the importance of informal help-seeking, as well as the differences, appropriateness, and value across different situations in which an individual would benefit from informal support (Rickwood and Thomas, 2012). Because of the limited understanding of informal support in the literature (Heerde and Hemphill, 2018), the need for further exploration of informal support as its own construct is evident.
Despite these key differences between informal and formal supports, the relationship between these two types of support can be complicated. Fonseca and Canavarro (2017) found that informal support predicted increases in formal help-seeking, with male partner support predicting higher formal help-seeking intentions in pregnant female partners. However, while they are not necessarily substitutive, there is some indication that informal help-seeking can serve as a barrier to formal help-seeking. This occurs when informal support is perceived to be a sufficient replacement for formal support, or when social support reduces stress and consequently, the perceived need for formal support (Maulik et al., 2011). However, Maulik et al. (2011) found that increased contact with informal supports can often predict the use of more formal supports, which they refer to as a referral function. Despite the complex relationship, formal and informal supports are often used together (see Brown et al., 2014), and very few individuals engage in only formal help-seeking (D'Avanzo et al., 2012). Differences in support utilization are based on the severity and type of mental health concern, alongside other environmental and personal factors (Maulik et al., 2011; Brown et al., 2014). Due to the differences between the dynamics of formal and informal help-seeking, it may be useful to consider them as separate help-seeking types altogether (Oliver et al., 1999). Although informal and formal help-seeking can work together, it is necessary to also understand in what ways each type of help-seeking is distinct, such as the nature of the relationship between the support recipient and the support provider, to develop a richer functional understanding of each (Lauzier-Jobin and Houle, 2022; Lien et al., 2024; Lynch et al., 2023).
The likelihood of engaging in help-seeking behaviors can be influenced by a variety of factors, including intrapersonal differences in the person engaging (or not) in help-seeking behaviors. One important factor is Mental Health Literacy (MHL), or the knowledge and beliefs an individual possesses about mental health and illness (Iswanto and Ayubi, 2023; Jorm et al., 1997; Jorm, 2012; Lien et al., 2024). This includes knowledge of positive mental health, mental disorders, stigma towards mental illnesses, mental health supports, risk factors, coping strategies, and attitudes towards mental health and help-seeking (Jorm et al., 1997; Kutcher et al., 2016; Wei et al., 2015). MHL has been found to explain a significant amount of the variance in adolescents’ mental wellbeing (Bjørnsen et al., 2019) and is an important predictor in formal help-seeking (Murray and Knudson, 2023; Iswanto and Ayubi, 2023; Jung et al., 2017; O'Connor and Casey, 2015). Furthermore, a lack of MHL acts as a significant barrier to help-seeking (Bonabi et al., 2016; Gulliver et al., 2010; McCann et al., 2016).
While the link between MHL and formal or general help-seeking is well established (Iswanto and Ayubi, 2023; Lien et al., 2024), the relationship between MHL and informal help-seeking has yet to be clearly established in the literature (Heerde and Hemphill, 2018). For example, Smith and Shochet (2011) found that MHL significantly explained the variance across general help-seeking intentions, which was operationalized to include both formal and informal supports. However, a similarly structured study by Samar and Perveen (2021), which used a combined general help-seeking outcome, did not find a relationship between MHL and help-seeking. Increases in MHL, however, have been shown to be associated with discussion of mental health concerns in general (Lindow et al., 2020). More broadly, Lien et al. (2024) found MHL to be a key factor influencing help-seeking attitudes while recognizing the importance of multiple other factors. These findings highlight the need for a standardized approach, as the field lacks a theoretical framework that fully captures the potential differences between formal and informal support. It is therefore critical to understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between MHL and both formal and informal help-seeking to provide a comprehensive understanding of this key area for intervention for both types of support (Fairchild et al., 2009).
Two other intrapersonal factors may be important to consider in the relationship between MHL and help-seeking behaviors: stigma and emotional intelligence. Stigma is an overarching term for the process of negatively labelling human differences within our society (e.g., mental illnesses), causing a variety of negative outcomes for those with these labels including negative stereotypes, separation, and status loss (Link and Phelan, 2001). Although public (social) stigma, which exists at the interpersonal level, is a common area of research, stigma can also exist at the structural and intrapersonal levels (Knaak et al., 2017; Livingston, 2020). Stigma at the intrapersonal level is called internalized stigma or self-stigma, and can specifically include negative beliefs (stereotypes), attitudes (prejudice), and behaviours (discrimination) toward help-seeking (Corrigan and Rao, 2012). Self-stigma is the internalization of structural and public stigma whereby an individual devalues themselves based on perceived markers of social distinction (Mak et al., 2007) and can be associated with a decrease in self-esteem and the denigration of one’s self concept (Corrigan et al., 2006).
Past literature has recognized stigma toward help-seeking as a key barrier to formal help-seeking intentions and behaviors, highlighting that both external and self-stigma can be difficult for individuals to overcome (Corrigan et al., 2006; Vogel et al., 2006). Cawley-Fiset (2016) found that as MHL increased, self-stigma of help-seeking decreased, and positive attitudes toward formal help-seeking increased—indicating that self-stigma may be a pathway through which MHL influences help-seeking (Lannin et al., 2016). With greater knowledge of one’s mental health challenges, one is better able to understand the benefits of seeking support to address those challenges. Although the literature is limited, mental health stigma has also been shown to be related to informal help-seeking and MHL (Lindow et al., 2020). However, Jung et al. (2017) found that while MHL predicted attitudes towards help-seeking, neither self-stigma, nor externalized mental health stigma served as mediators. They did find that MHL was a predictor of externally focused stigma; however, externally focused stigma was not a predictor of attitudes towards help-seeking. Conversely, they found MHL was not a predictor of self-stigma, although self-stigma was a predictor of attitudes towards help-seeking. Due to the lack of clarity regarding the role of self-stigma of help-seeking, there is a need for further research in this area (Tucker et al., 2013).
The second explanatory factor, emotional intelligence (EI), broadly refers to an individual’s ability to perceive, understand, regulate, and reflect on emotions (Mayer and Salovey, 1995; Mayer, 1997; Mayer et al., 2000). While some view EI as a cognitive ability, others conceptualize it as a as a trait encompassing well-being, self-regulation, emotionality and sociability (Hughes and Evans, 2018; Petrides et al., 2016; Petrides, 2009). Furthermore, some conceptualize EI as a combination of both perspectives (Bar-On, 1997; Goleman, 2005; Bru-Luna et al., 2021). While research directly examining EI and help-seeking—formal or informal—is limited, EI has been linked to instrumental and emotional social support-seeking, as well as positive mental health outcomes (Gohm and Clore, 2002; Sarrionandia and Mikolajczak, 2019). Furthermore, specific facets of EI, such as self-compassion and emotional openness have been linked to favorable attitudes towards help-seeking (Dschaak et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2022; Komiya et al., 2000). Perception and understanding, regulation, and labelling are all identified facets of EI shown to be related to general help-seeking attitudes (Gecaite et al., 2016; Cuvalo, 2021). Similar concepts such as emotional competency (the capacity of an individual to perceive and regulate personal and others’ emotions) have also been shown to be associated with informal help-seeking from family and friends (Ciarrochi et al., 2003). The proposed mechanism behind these links is the capacity to which an individual can manage or perceive the management of their emotions and mood, which often serve as indicators of one’s mental state (Gross et al., 2019).
Salovey et al. (1995) describes meta-mood as a facet of EI that refers to individuals’ awareness of, attention to, and ability to repair their emotional state. Conceptually, meta-mood aligns with mental health literacy (MHL) when defined as the application of mental health knowledge to oneself—particularly in recognizing, understanding, and managing emotions. Although limited research has examined the specific link between meta-mood and help-seeking, the focus of meta-mood on emotional awareness, consideration, and regulation strongly maps onto key facets of MHL. Namely the recognition and consideration that one may be experiencing something concerning. Consequently, regulation may include help-seeking as a form of recovery from an emotional or mental health concern. This similarity may serve to partially explain the relationship between MHL and both formal and informal help-seeking (O'Connor and Casey, 2015; Gecaite et al., 2016; Fteiha and Awwad, 2020; Cuvalo, 2021), which is why it was selected as the operationalization of EI in the current study.
The current study investigated the relationships between MHL and formal and informal help-seeking intentions, in addition to examining self-stigma and EI (operationalized as meta-mood) as possible mediators of these relationships. To help delineate informal and formal help-seeking in the literature, and provide evidence for two possible explanatory variables, the current study utilized a cross-sectional survey design to investigate these relationships with two primary research aims: (1) Assess the relationship between MHL and formal and informal help-seeking intentions; and (2) Determine whether stigma towards help-seeking or meta-mood mediate this relationship. Consistent with previous literature (Smith and Shochet, 2011), the first hypothesis was that there would be a positive relationship between MHL and both formal (Hla) and informal (H1b) help-seeking intentions. The second hypothesis was that stigma towards help-seeking (H2a) and meta-mood (H2b) would mediate the relationship between MHL and formal help-seeking. Given the paucity of research on the relationship between MHL and informal help-seeking, no specific hypotheses were made regarding whether self-stigma or meta-mood would mediate this relationship. This aspect of the study was exploratory in nature.
2 Methods
2.1 Participants
Utilizing a convenience sample, a total of 322 participants were recruited through the Department of Psychology’s Research Participation System (RPS) at a Western Canadian postsecondary institution. Participants were compensated for their time with bonus course credit in an eligible undergraduate psychology course. On the post-survey consent check, seven participants requested not to release their data, and another 14 participants were excluded due to incomplete responses. The final sample contained 301 participants, of which 278 identified as female, 17 as male, and six participants identified as non-binary. The ages of participants ranged from 17 to 51 (M = 19.88, SD = 3.69). Self-reported ethnic backgrounds were 40.6% White, 23.6% Southeast Asian, 10.3% East Asian, 6.0% Mixed, 5.3% Black, 4.3% Filipino, 3.7% Arab and West Asian, 2.0% Latin American, 1.3% Indigenous, 1.3% Other, 1.0% Caribbean, and 0.7% unsure. Although participants’ degree programs were not collected for the current study, the pool that participants were drawn from was comprised of 13.6% Psychology majors, 30.3% other Arts majors, 24.2% Science majors, 8.3% Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies majors, 7.8% Kinesiology majors, with the rest of the pool coming from Engineering, Social Work, Nursing, Education, and Open Studies. Participants were also asked about their history of mental health issues (diagnosed or undiagnosed). Around half of the sample (56.1%; n = 169) reported a history of mental health issues, 37.9% reported no history, and 6% preferred not to disclose. Participants who reported a history of mental health issues were then asked about their prior help-seeking behaviors. Over half of this subset of participants (57.4%) reported using both formal and informal support, 26% reported using only informal supports, 8.3% reported using only formal supports, and 8.3% preferred not to disclose.
2.2 Measures
2.2.1 The mental help seeking intention scale
The Mental Help Seeking Intention Scale (MHSIS) (Hammer and Spiker, 2018) measures intentions to seek professional help for mental health concerns. Assessing help-seeking intentions enables researchers to predict future help-seeking behaviors, rather than using a retrospective measure of actual help-seeking, which can be prone to recall error, and allows for cross sectional study designs that predict help-seeking (Whyte, 2021). Research has found that formal help-seeking intentions are often closely linked to formal help-seeking behaviors (Kim and Hunter, 1993; Hammer and Spiker, 2018).
For the purposes of this study, a set of items were developed to assess help-seeking intentions from informal sources (e.g., friends, family, etc.) by adapting the MHSIS. This was done by replacing the start of the prompt, “I would intend to seek support from a mental health professional” with “I would intend to seek support from someone other than a mental health professional.” The adapted scale contains six items, three of which measure formal help-seeking intentions and three of which measure informal help-seeking intentions. Higher scores on the scale reflect higher help-seeking intentions. In addition to this adaptation, the response scale was adapted from a 7-point Likert scale measuring agreement with statements (Strongly Disagree—Neutral—Strongly Agree), to a forced-choice 6-point Likert scale (Strongly Disagree—Strongly Agree). As a binary construct, the intention to seek help maps on to agreement with the statements; however, both a neutral response and disagreement with the statements indicate a lack of that intention (Sheeran, 2002). As such, a neutral response in intentionality is not a valuable response for a binary understanding of intentionality. Retaining a Likert scale, however, ensures that both intensity and directionality of intention can be assessed.
The MHSIS was developed based on principles from the theory of planned behavior, which posits that multiple factors combine to predict behavioral intentions, including attitudes toward the behavior, expectations of others, and perceived control in performing the behavior (Ajzen, 1991). The original scale has been found to have a high level of predictive validity (Hammer and Spiker, 2018). Both the original and adapted scales displayed high reliability for formal help-seeking intentions (α = 0.96) and informal help-seeking intentions (α = 0.91) in the current study.
2.2.2 Mental health literacy scale
The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) (O'Connor and Casey, 2015) measures multiple components of MHL, including: (1) the ability to identify features of specific mental illnesses; (2) knowledge of how and where to learn about mental health; (3) understanding of risk factors that contribute to mental health issues; (4) knowledge of self-treatment practices; (5) where and how to access professional help, as well as knowing what services they can provide; (6) attitudes that promote recognition of mental health issues; and (7) attitudes that influence help-seeking, including stigma against mental illness, help-seeking, and individuals who have mental illnesses (Jorm et al., 1997; Wei et al., 2015).
The MHLS asks participants to respond to several items based on 4-point Likert scales for likeliness (Very Unlikely—Very Likely) and helpfulness (Very Unhelpful—Very Helpful), as well as 5-point Likert scales for agreement (Strongly Disagree—Strongly Agree) and willingness (Definitely Unwilling—Definitely Willing). It produces a unidimensional score, where higher scores reflect higher mental health literacy. The scale has 35 items, 12 of which are reverse coded. Example items include “To what extent do you think it would be helpful for someone to improve their quality of sleep if they were having difficulties managing their emotions (e.g., becoming very anxious or depressed)” and the reverse-coded, “A mental illness is not a real medical illness.” The MHLS demonstrates strong psychometric properties, including high construct validity and high internal consistency (O'Connor and Casey, 2015). The scale displayed good reliability (α = 0.88) in the current study.
2.2.3 Self-stigma of seeking help
Designed by Vogel et al. (2006), the Self-Stigma of Seeking Help Scale (SSOSH) measures the stigma that individuals apply to themselves when considering seeking psychological help. The SSOSH has 10 items, five of which are reverse coded. An example item is “My self-confidence would NOT be threatened if I sought professional help.” Responses are measured on a 7-point Likert scale where 1 corresponds to Strongly Disagree and 7 corresponds to Strongly Agree. Higher scores on the scale reflect higher levels of self-stigma. The SSOSH has been found to have very strong psychometric properties, including high construct, criterion, and predictive validity (Vogel et al., 2006), in addition to high reliability in the current study (α = 0.90).
2.2.4 Trait-Meta mood scale
The Trait Meta-Mood Scale was originally developed by Salovey et al. (1995) to measure clarity of, attention to, and the tendency to repair one’s emotions and moods. Clarity is concerned with an understanding of how one is feeling, whereas attention refers to whether an individual cares to pay attention to their emotions and mood. Repair describes an individual’s capacity and willingness to engage in maintenance of positive moods and to repair negative moods. The original 48-item scale was shortened to 24 items by Fernandez-Berrocal et al. (2004), with each sub facet retaining high reliability. An example item from the scale is “I think my emotions and state of mind deserve to be paid attention to.” Responses were adapted from a 5-point to a 7-point Likert scale measuring agreement with each item (Strongly Disagree—Strongly Agree) to improve scale sensitivity (see Finstad, 2010). Higher mean scores on the scale reflect higher emotional awareness, understanding, and care for one’s own mood. In this study, the scale displayed high reliability (α = 0.89).
2.3 Procedure
Participants accessed the study on the online Qualtrics survey platform, from a location of their choice, using a computer or mobile device, and provided informed consent prior to completing the study measures. Once consent was provided, participants were given 1 week to complete the survey. Scale order within the survey was randomized, as were the items in each scale. After completing the questionnaires, participants were asked demographic information including their age, gender, ethnicity, whether they had a history of mental illness, and, if so, whether they had previously utilized any mental health supports. After completing these measures, participants were debriefed and thanked for their participation. They were then asked to consent to submit their data for inclusion in the current study, as well as in future studies. Human research ethics approval was obtained for this study prior to data collection.
3 Results
3.1 Preliminary analyses
Prior to conducting mediation analyses to test the hypotheses, each of the assumptions of mediation were assessed, namely, (1) linearity between the variables of interest; (2) lack of multicollinearity between the variables of interest; and (3) normality of all variables of interest (Fein et al., 2022). A visual inspection of scatterplots for all combinations of the variables of interest confirmed no obvious non-linear patterns between any of the variables of interest. Correlation coefficients were examined between all variables of interest and confirmed that there was no multicollinearity between any of the variables (all r’s < 0.50). Lastly, a visual inspection of normality probability plots for all variables confirmed that each variable met the assumption of normality supporting use of mediation analyses. The means, standard deviations, and the minimum and maximum scores of each of the study measures can be seen in Table 1. Mediation statistics including: standardized betas (β), unstandardized betas (B), t-scores (t), standard error scores (SEβ, SEB), p-values (p), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIβ, 95% CIB) are reported. All statistical analyses were completed using SPSS Statistics Software (Version 29), and mediation analyses were completed using Hayes PROCESS Macro for SPSS (Version 4.2; Hayes, 2018).
3.2 MHL, formal help-seeking, and self-stigma
To determine whether there was a relationship between MHL and formal help-seeking, as well as if self-stigma mediated this relationship, a single-step mediation analysis was conducted (see Figure 1). The results revealed that MHL was a significant positive predictor of formal help-seeking (H1a supported), β = 0.41, B = 1.24, t(299) = 7.80, SEB = 0.16, p < 0.001. Mental health literacy was also a significant negative predictor of the self-stigma of help-seeking, β = −0.49, B = −1.44, t(299) = −9.82, SEB = 0.15, p < 0.001, and self-stigma of help-seeking was a significant negative predictor of formal help-seeking, β = −0.28, B = −0.29, t(299) = −4.79, SEB = 0.06, p < 0.001. The indirect effect, bolstered by the bootstrap estimation (5,000 resamples), revealed self-stigma as a significant mediator of the relationship between MHL and formal help-seeking (H2a supported), (β = 0.14, SEβ = 0.03, 95% CIβ = 0.07, 0.20; B = 0.41, SEB = 0.10, 95% CIB = 0.22, 0.62). With the indirect effect controlled for, MHL remained a significant predictor of formal help-seeking (β = 0.28, B = 0.82, t(299) = 4.67, SEB = 0.18, 95% CIB = 0.47, 1.17), consistent with partial mediation.

Figure 1. A mediation model of MHL, self-stigma, and formal help-seeking. This mediation model depicts formal help-seeking intentions as a function of MHL and self-stigma when self-stigma is controlled for (c’) and uncontrolled for (c). Furthermore, it shows the direct relationships of self-stigma to MHL and formal help-seeking. Lettered are the unstandardized beta coefficients for each relationship. *p < 0.001.
3.3 MHL, formal help-seeking, and emotional intelligence (meta-mood)
In addition to MHL being positively related to formal help-seeking as found in 3.2, the results showed that MHL was a significant positive predictor of meta-mood, β = 0.31, B = 0.63, t(299) = 5.79, SEB = 0.11, p < 0.001, which was then a significant positive predictor of formal help-seeking, β = 0.17, B = 0.26, t(299) = 3.16, SEB = 0.08, p < 0.001. The indirect effect, bolstered by the bootstrap estimation (5,000 resamples), revealed meta-mood as a mediator of the relationship between MHL and formal help-seeking (H2b supported; β = 0.06, SEβ = 0.02, 95% CIβ = 0.02, 0.09; B = 0.17, SEB = 0.06, 95% CIB = 0.07, 0.29). With the indirect effect controlled for, MHL remained a significant predictor of formal help-seeking, β = 0.36, B = 1.07, t(299) = 6.50, SEB = 0.17, 95% CIB = 0.75, 1.40, consistent with partial mediation; see Figure 2.

Figure 2. A mediation model of MHL, meta-mood, and formal help-seeking. This mediation model depicts formal help-seeking intentions as a function of MHL and meta-mood when meta-mood is controlled for (c’) and uncontrolled for (c). Furthermore, it shows the direct relationships of meta-mood to MHL and formal help-seeking. Lettered are the unstandardized beta coefficients for each relationship.
3.4 MHL, informal help-seeking, and self-stigma
Parallel analyses as above were conducted to assess the hypothesized relationship between MHL and informal help seeking, and whether self-stigma mediated this relationship. However, the results revealed that MHL was not a significant predictor of informal help-seeking (H1b not supported), β = 0.47, B = 0.14, t(299) = 0.80, SEB = 0.18, p = 0.419. Although MHL was inversely related to self-stigma as found in 3.2, self-stigma did not significantly predict informal help-seeking, β = 0.04, B = 0.04, t(299) = 0.59, SEB = 0.07, p = 0.555, nor did self-stigma act as a mediator between MHL and informal help-seeking, (β = 0.02, SEβ = 0.04, 95% CIβ = −0.09, 0.05; B = −0.06, SEB = 0.11, 95% CIB = −0.28, 0.15) see Figure 3.

Figure 3. A mediation model of MHL, self-stigma, and informal help-seeking. This mediation model depicts informal help-seeking intentions as a function of MHL and self-stigma when self-stigma is controlled for (c’) and uncontrolled for (c). Furthermore, it shows the direct relationships of self-stigma to MHL and informal help-seeking. Lettered are the unstandardized beta coefficients for each relationship.
3.5 MHL, informal help-seeking and emotional intelligence (meta-mood)
Despite MHL showing no significant total effect on informal help seeking in 3.4, according to Hayes (2009), there can still be underlying mediation effects (Zhao et al., 2010). As previously identified in 3.3, MHL was a significant positive predictor of meta-mood. Additionally, meta-mood was a significant positive predictor of informal help-seeking, β = 0.23, B = 0.35, t(299) = 3.82, SEB = 0.09, p < 0.001 (see Figure 4). These relationships account for the indirect effect, bolstered by the bootstrap estimation (5,000 resamples), that meta-mood played in the relationship between MHL and informal help-seeking, (β = 0.07, SEβ = 0.02, 95% CIβ = 0.03, 0.12; B = 0.22, SEB = 0.07, 95% CIB = 0.08, 0.37). These results are consistent with an indirect-only mediation.

Figure 4. A mediation model of MHL, meta-mood, and informal help-seeking. This mediation model depicts informal help-seeking intentions as a function of mental health literacy and meta-mood when meta-mood is controlled for (c’) and uncontrolled for (c). Furthermore, it shows the direct relationship of meta-mood to MHL and informal help-seeking. Lettered are the unstandardized beta coefficients for each relationship. *p < 0.001.
4 Discussion
The aim of the current study was to examine the relationships between MHL and formal and informal help-seeking intentions, as well as to investigate the role of self-stigma and meta-mood as possible mediators for these relationships. The results from the study are discussed below, along with implications of the findings, study limitations, and directions for future research.
4.1 Summary of findings
In support of H1a, it was found that MHL was a significant predictor of formal help-seeking intentions. This finding is consistent with prior research that low MHL serves as a barrier to formal help-seeking (Bonabi et al., 2016; Gulliver et al., 2010), and higher MHL is associated with higher rates of formal help-seeking (Iswanto and Ayubi, 2023; Smith and Shochet, 2011). The current study failed to establish a link between MHL and informal help-seeking intentions, contrary to H1b. This result is inconsistent with the few studies that have examined this relationship, such as Lindow et al. (2020) who found an increase in discussion about depression among peers, and in the number of students who had discussions about depression and suicidal thoughts with school staff after a high school MHL intervention. It may be that interventions targeting MHL and aimed at supporting students within a structured setting such a school environment are more likely to facilitate informal help-seeking, fostering an environment in which informal help-seeking is encouraged. In contrast, the current study examined help-seeking intentions, without the inclusion of an intervention (i.e., an actionable set of help-seeking behaviors provided to participants), which may partially explain the lack of a relationship found in the current study.
The current study’s findings, as expected, are also inconsistent with studies in which researchers used a combined measure of formal and informal help-seeking, operationalizing these as one general help-seeking construct (e.g., Smith and Shochet, 2011). Because of the differences between informal and formal help-seeking, the grouping of both types into a general help-seeking outcome may misrepresent the underlying data. D'Avanzo et al. (2012) grouped informal supports into closely related supports (friends, family, partner) and broad informal supports (clergy, teacher, someone else). These two groups of informal support displayed a disparity in terms of utilization, providing further evidence that grouping them together into a single measure in the current study may not accurately represent the underlying construct. Similarly, within the results of the current study, the results vary when separating formal and informal help-seeking, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between informal and formal supports when examining help-seeking. Especially in the context of laying the groundwork for actionable interventions, the effects of identified factors must be understood within the context of the type of help sought.
In support of H2a, it was found that self-stigma partially mediated the relationship between MHL and formal help-seeking intentions. This finding is consistent with Cawley-Fiset (2016) who found that after an MHL intervention, self-stigma towards help-seeking decreased significantly. Additionally, self-stigma has been found to be a negative predictor of formal help-seeking intentions across multiple studies (Jung et al., 2017; Fleary et al., 2022; Vogel et al., 2006; Waqas et al., 2020).
In support of H2b, meta-mood also partially mediated the relationship between MHL and formal help-seeking intentions. There is a lack of literature on meta-mood in relation to MHL; however, the current results are consistent with studies that have linked emotional intelligence to MHL. For example, emotional intelligence has been linked with higher mental illness recognition, a key facet of MHL (Furnham et al., 2011). Additionally, the link between meta-mood and formal help-seeking is consistent with related literature, which has found that higher emotional self-regulation and emotional awareness are associated with more positive attitudes towards help-seeking (Cuvalo, 2021; Komiya et al., 2000). It is important to investigate other factors involved in the relationship between MHL and formal help-seeking given that partial mediation through self-stigma and meta-mood were found in the current study.
Regarding the exploratory mediations with informal help-seeking, although the current study did not find a direct-effect relationship between MHL and informal help-seeking intentions, meta-mood did act as a mediator between the two variables. This difference in findings between formal and informal help-seeking may be due to them sharing some common mechanisms, but being conceptually distinct constructs (Saltzman et al., 2020).
Finally, it was found that meta-mood was a significant predictor of informal help-seeking intentions. While meta-mood has not been tested before in this context (to our knowledge), this finding is consistent with past literature on similar constructs. For example, emotional competency has been linked with reaching out to friends and family for support (Ciarrochi et al., 2003). Given that meta-mood was also related to aspects of MHL, a potential mechanism behind this relationship could be that while MHL concerns knowledge of mental health in general, meta-mood is the capacity of the individual to relate some of those aspects to oneself. Due to the limited literature on meta-mood, further research is necessary to establish the specific mechanisms at play.
5 Implications
Theoretical implications of the findings include replicating and extending the previous literature with regards to providing further support for the link between MHL and formal help-seeking and providing evidence that informal help-seeking is a distinct variable driven by different factors. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between the type of support rather than representing it as a general construct. From a practical perspective, not only will this allow for a better understanding of relevant factors for each type of support, but it may inform the development of more specific, and potentially effective, interventions and education. When creating interventions based on factors related to help-seeking, the knowledge that some factors such as self-stigma may act as a larger barrier to formal help-seeking than informal help-seeking can inform program development and promotion efforts.
Understanding what factors may be involved in both types of support, such as meta-mood, supports a stronger understanding of the help-seeking process and how it takes place. It may be that individuals who pay attention to their emotions recognize the importance of help-seeking in formal and informal settings more readily. This knowledge can also serve to inform evaluation of current programs involving MHL with formal help-seeking as an outcome (Fairchild et al., 2009).
The findings on informal help-seeking justify the value of assessing informal help-seeking as a distinct construct from formal help-seeking and underscores the importance of further research into predictors and mediators of informal help-seeking. By further understanding different types of help-seeking, researchers can better promote informal help-seeking within communities to support positive mental health outcomes (Levula et al., 2016), and increase formal support utilization (Fonseca and Canavarro, 2017). This is especially important in populations who may be less likely to engage in formal help-seeking behaviours (Doll et al., 2021; Zachrisson et al., 2006), as well as communities who may face more barriers to formal help-seeking (Carbonell et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2015; Vickery, 2021).
While there is some aspect of emotional intelligence involved in formal help-seeking, namely awareness and the ability to externalize and communicate the experiential feeling of mental health concerns, a parallel importance exists in informal supports (Lang, 2024). The primary component in terms of interventions seeking to promote help-seeking may benefit from focusing on awareness, and consideration of emotional states – by helping individuals better understand what they are experiencing, as well as to encouraging participants to give weight to that experience, and coupling this with an emphasis on MHL, from a help-seeking perspective, gives an individual awareness of their concern, validation that this concern is worth seeking-help for, and the knowledge necessary to engage in help-seeking behaviors (Janz and Becker, 1984; Langley et al., 2021; Kotsou et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2024).
5.1 Limitations and future directions
Although this study did contain some notable strengths (e.g., separating out formal and informal help-seeking into separate constructs), as with all research, there were limitations. First, the sample consisted wholly of university undergraduates taking psychology courses, most of whom were female (95%), white (40%) and young (M = 19.88, 95% CI = 19.46, 20.30). This is a significant limitation because of the relationship that this sample likely has higher MHL, as psychology coursework frequently deals with mental health constructs and those enrolled in psychology courses have been shown to have higher mental health literacy when compared to other students (Lauber et al., 2005; Miles et al., 2020). Thus, this sample cannot be generalized to the public and serves to illustrate effects in the undergraduate student population. Additionally, due to the gender split, findings cannot be easily generalized to males and other genders.
To address this limitation, future research must explicitly seek out diverse populations to identify whether relevant gender, cultural, or age effects exist, as well as if demographic distributions play a role in the relationship between MHL and formal and informal help-seeking. For example, Guo et al. (2015) found that the disparity between Vietnamese-American adolescents and European-American adolescents in help-seeking behaviors was moderated by cultural factors, including perceptions of familial obligation and familial stress. Additionally, Vickery (2021) found multiple factors complicating the access of formal support for men, including challenges with disclosure and articulation of distress, and cultural norms in personal social circles. Because of these cultural influences on help-seeking among males, it is critical that future research in this area be conducted with male samples. Additionally, help-seeking research is severely lacking for populations who self-identify as gender diverse, non-binary, or gender-queer. Considering the higher risk of mental health concerns in this population, as well as disproportionately more barriers to appropriate care, there is an urgent need for research focusing on gender diverse, non-binary, and transgender populations (Chakawa, 2018; Cronin et al., 2025).
Second, the adaptation of the MHSIS into an informal help-seeking measure was not validated. It was adapted to serve as an informal alternative to mirror the formal help-seeking items; however, because it is evident that formal and informal help-seeking are related but distinct constructs, this may have been an inappropriate adaptation. Furthermore, the conceptualization of informal help-seeking as a unidimensional construct was not based on the literature. Given the variance found in the current study across specific informal supports, it may not be appropriate to have grouped informal supports together to create a single score for each participant for the purposes of the analyses (D'Avanzo et al., 2012; Lauzier-Jobin and Houle, 2022).
Finally, as mentioned previously, in addition to further investigations of informal help-seeking as its own construct, future research should explore predictors and mediators of informal help-seeking. This is important to develop an understanding of informal help-seeking and the ways in which it is similar and distinct from formal help-seeking, as well as to build an actionable understanding of both constructs to inform the creation of effective evidence-based interventions to promote informal and formal help-seeking.
6 Conclusion
Help-seeking is an important action individuals can take to address their mental health concerns (Yonemoto and Kawashima, 2023). To promote help-seeking, an understanding of support sources is necessary. While individuals can seek help from both formal and informal sources, the literature primarily focuses on formal supports. A need to understand the dynamics driving predictors of informal help-seeking is necessary given its importance in promoting formal help-seeking and bypassing structural barriers that individuals face in accessing formal supports. The findings of the current study illustrate a link between MHL and formal help-seeking and identify the roles of self-stigma and meta-mood in explaining this link. Although the study did not establish a relationship between MHL and informal help-seeking, it did find that MHL was related to meta-mood, and that meta-mood was related to informal help-seeking, providing key directions for future research. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the need to incorporate multiple factors when studying MHL and help-seeking outcomes, for both research and application.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by University of Calgary, CFREB Ethics Board. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided digital informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
MA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BL: Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decis. Process. Theor. Cognit. Self Regulat. 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
American Psychological Association (2022). Psychologists struggle to meet demand amid mental health crisis. Available online at: Available online at: https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/practitioner/2022-covid-psychologist-workload (Accessed March 15, 2024).
Andrews, G. (1999). Efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency in mental health service delivery. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 33, 316–322. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00581.x
Biddle, L., Donovan, J., Sharp, D., and Gunnell, D. (2007). Explaining non-help-seeking amongst young adults with mental distress: a dynamic interpretive model of illness behaviour. Sociol. Health Illn. 29, 983–1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01030.x
Bjørnsen, H. N., Espnes, G. A., Eilertsen, M. B., Ringdal, R., and Moksnes, U. K. (2019). The relationship between positive mental health literacy and mental well-being among adolescents: implications for school health services. J. Sch. Nurs. 35, 107–116. doi: 10.1177/1059840517732125
Bonabi, H., Müller, M., Ajdacic-Gross, V., Eisele, J., Rodgers, S., Seifritz, E., et al. (2016). Mental health literacy, attitudes to help seeking, and perceived need as predictors of mental health service use: a longitudinal study. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 204, 321–324. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000488
Brewer, K. B., Gearing, R. E., Cheung, M., Leung, P., Carr, L. C., Savani, S., et al. (2024). Formal versus informal pathways to mental health care in China. China J. Soc. Work 17, 3–20. doi: 10.1080/17525098.2023.2252913
Brown, J., Evans-Lacko, S., Aschan, L., Henderson, M. J., Hatch, S. L., and Hotopf, M. (2014). Seeking informal and formal help for mental health problems in the community: a secondary analysis from a psychiatric morbidity survey in South London. BMC Psychiatry 14:275. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0275-y
Bru-Luna, L. M., Martí-Vilar, M., Merino-Soto, C., and Cervera-Santiago, J. L. (2021). Emotional intelligence measures: a systematic review. Healthcare 9:1696. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121696
Bryant, R. A., Gallagher, H. C., Gibbs, L., Pattison, P., MacDougall, C., Harms, L., et al. (2017). Mental health and social networks after disaster. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 277–285. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111403
Carbonell, Á., Navarro-Pérez, J. J., and Mestre, M. V. (2020). Challenges and barriers in mental healthcare systems and their impact on the family: a systematic integrative review. Health Soc. Care Community 28, 1366–1379. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12968
Carpentier, N., and Bernard, P. (2011). “The complexities of help-seeking: exploring challenges through a social network perspective” in The handbook of the sociology of health, illness, and healing. Eds. B. Pescosolido, J. Martin, J. McLeod, and A. Rogers. (New York, NY: Springer New York), 465–479. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7261-3_24
Cawley-Fiset, E. I. (2016). Knowledge and beliefs about mental health and their impact on attitudes and help-seeking behaviour. Montreal, QC: McGill University.
Chakawa, A. (2018). The impact of mental health literacy on treatment seeking intentions across specific disorders: accounting for race/ethnicity. Auburn, Alabama: Auburn University.
Ciarrochi, J., Wilson, C. J., Deane, F. P., and Rickwood, D. (2003). Do difficulties with emotions inhibit help-seeking in adolescence? The role of age and emotional competence in predicting help-seeking intentions. Couns. Psychol. Q. 16, 103–120. doi: 10.1080/0951507031000152632
Corrigan, P. W., and Rao, D. (2012). On the self-stigma of mental illness: stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Can. J. Psychiatr. 57, 464–469. doi: 10.1177/070674371205700804
Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C., and Barr, L. (2006). The self-stigma of mental illness: implications for self-esteem and self-efficacy. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 25, 875–884. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875
Cronin, T. J., Pepping, C. A., and Lyons, A. (2025). Mental health service use and barriers to accessing Services in a Cohort of transgender, gender diverse, and non-binary adults in Australia. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 22, 150–163. doi: 10.1007/s13178-023-00866-4
Cuvalo, N. (2021). Exploring the role(s) of trait emotional intelligence & personality in help-seeking behaviour among undergraduate students. London, Ontario: The University of Western Ontario.
D'Avanzo, B., Barbato, A., Erzegovesi, S., Lampertico, L., Rapisarda, F., and Valsecchi, L. (2012). Formal and informal help-seeking for mental health problems. A survey of preferences of Italian students. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 8, 47–51. doi: 10.2174/1745017901208010047
Doll, C. M., Michel, C., Rosen, M., Osman, N., Schimmelmann, B. G., and Schultze-Lutter, F. (2021). Predictors of help-seeking behaviour in people with mental health problems: a 3-year prospective community study. BMC Psychiatry 21, 1–432. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03435-4
Dong, Y., Cheng, L., and Cao, H. (2024). Impact of informal social support on the mental health of older adults. Front. Public Health 12:1446246. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1446246
Dschaak, Z. A., Spiker, D. A., Berney, E. C., Miller, M. E., and Hammer, J. H. (2021). Collegian help seeking: the role of self-compassion and self-coldness. J. Ment. Health 30, 284–291. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1677873
Eisenberg, D., Hunt, J., Speer, N., and Zivin, K. (2011). Mental health service utilization among college students in the United States. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 199, 301–308. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182175123
Elkin, I., Gibbons, R. D., Shea, M. T., Sotsky, S. M., Watkins, J. T., Pilkonis, P. A., et al. (1995). Initial severity and differential treatment outcome in the national institute of mental health treatment of depression collaborative research program. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 63, 841–847. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.841
Fairchild, A. J., Mackinnon, D. P., Taborga, M. P., and Taylor, A. B. (2009). R2 effect-size measures for mediation analysis. Behav. Res. Methods 41, 486–498. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.486
Fein, E. C., Gilmour, J., Machin, T., and Hendry, L. (2022). Section 1.5: normality. Statistics for Research Students. Available at: https://usq.pressbooks.pub/statisticsforresearchstudents/chapter/1-5-normality/ (Accessed March 12, 2024).
Fernandez-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N., and Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the trait meta-mood scale. Psychol. Rep. 94, 751–755. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.3.751-755
Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: evidence against 5-point scales. J. Usability Stud. 5, 104–110.
Fleary, S. A., Joseph, P. L., Gonçalves, C., Somogie, J., and Angeles, J. (2022). The relationship between health literacy and mental health attitudes and beliefs. Health Lit. Res. Pract. 6, e270–e279. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20221018-01
Fonseca, A., and Canavarro, M. C. (2017). Women's intentions of informal and formal help-seeking for mental health problems during the perinatal period: the role of perceived encouragement from the partner. Midwifery 50, 78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.001
Fteiha, M., and Awwad, N. (2020). Emotional intelligence and its relationship with stress coping style. Health Psychol. Open 7:416. doi: 10.1177/2055102920970416
Furnham, A., Cook, R., Martin, N., and Batey, M. (2011). Mental health literacy among university students. J. Public Ment. Health 10, 198–210. doi: 10.1108/17465721111188223
Gecaite, J., Levickiene, G., and Mickuviene, N. (2016). Attitudes toward professional psychological help-seeking, perceived emotional intelligence, and prior help-seeking experience among students in Lithuania. Biol. Psychiatry Psychopharmacol. 18, 76–80.
Gohm, C. L., and Clore, G. L. (2002). “Affect as information: An individual-differences approach” in The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence. eds. L. F. Barrett and P. Salovey (New York: The Guilford Press), 89–113.
Gross, J. J., Uusberg, H., and Uusberg, A. (2019). Mental illness and well-being: An affect regulation perspective. World Psychiatry 18, 130–139. doi: 10.1002/wps.20618
Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K. M., and Christensen, H. (2010). Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 10:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-113
Guo, S., Nguyen, H., Weiss, B., Ngo, V. K., and Lau, A. S. (2015). Linkages between mental health need and help-seeking behavior among adolescents: moderating role of ethnicity and cultural values. J. Couns. Psychol. 62, 682–693. doi: 10.1037/cou0000094
Hammer, J. H., and Spiker, D. A. (2018). Dimensionality, reliability, and predictive evidence of validity for three help seeking intention instruments: ISCI, GHSQ, and MHSIS. J. Couns. Psychol. 65, 394–401. doi: 10.1037/cou0000256
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun. Monogr. 76, 408–420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Second Edn. New York: The Guilford Press.
Heerde, J. A., and Hemphill, S. A. (2018). Examination of associations between informal help-seeking behavior, social support, and adolescent psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Dev. Rev. 47, 44–62. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2017.10.001
Holden, K. B., McGregor, B. S., Blanks, S. H., and Mahaffey, C. (2012). Psychosocial, socio-cultural, and environmental influences on mental health help-seeking among African-American men. J. Men's Health 9, 63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jomh.2012.03.002
Hughes, D. J., and Evans, T. R. (2018). Putting ‘emotional intelligences’ in their place: introducing the integrated model of affect-related individual differences. Front. Psychol. 9:2155. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02155
Iswanto, E. D., and Ayubi, D. (2023). The relationship of mental health literacy to help-seeking behavior: systematic review. J. Soc. Res. 2, 755–764. doi: 10.55324/josr.v2i3.726
Janz, N. K., and Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ. Q. 11, 1–47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101
Jorm, A. F. (2012). Mental health literacy: empowering the community to take action for better mental health. Am. Psychol. 67, 231–243. doi: 10.1037/a0025957
Jorm, A. F., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., Christensen, H., Rodgers, B., and Pollitt, P. (1997). "Mental health literacy": a survey of the public's ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Med. J. Aust. 166, 182–186. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb140071.x
Jung, H., von Sternberg, K., and Davis, K. (2017). The impact of mental health literacy, stigma, and social support on attitudes toward mental health help-seeking. Int. J. Ment. Health Promot. 19, 252–267. doi: 10.1080/14623730.2017.1345687
Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a complementary strategy for improving national mental health. Am. Psychol. 62, 95–108. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95
Kim, M. S., and Hunter, J. E. (1993). Attitude-behavior relations: a meta-analysis of attitudinal relevance and topic. J. Commun. 43, 101–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01251.x
Kim, P. Y., Jin, J., and Bau, K. E. (2022). A mediator or moderator? Self-compassion’s role in the association between emotional self-control and help-seeking attitudes among Asian American college students. Asian Am. J. Psychol. 13, 185–193. doi: 10.1037/aap0000248
Kisling, L. A., and Das, J. M. (2023). Data from prevention strategies. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing.
Knaak, S., Mantler, E., and Szeto, A. (2017). Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare: barriers to access and care and evidence-based solutions. Healthc. Manage. Forum 30, 111–116. doi: 10.1177/0840470416679413
Kohn, R., Ali, A. A., Puac-Polanco, V., Figueroa, C., López-Soto, V., Morgan, K., et al. (2018). Mental health in the Americas: an overview of the treatment gap. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 42:165. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.165
Kohn, R., Saxena, S., Levav, I., and Saraceno, B. (2004). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull. World Health Organ. 82, 858–866
Komiya, N., Good, G. E., and Sherrod, N. B. (2000). Emotional openness as a predictor of college students' attitudes toward seeking psychological help. J. Couns. Psychol. 47, 138–143. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.138
Kotsou, I., Mikolajczak, M., Heeren, A., Grégoire, J., and Leys, C. (2018). Improving emotional intelligence: a systematic review of existing work and future challenges. Emot. Rev. 11, 151–165. doi: 10.1177/1754073917735902
Kutcher, S., Wei, Y., and Coniglio, C. (2016). Mental health literacy: past, present, and future. Can. J. Psychiatr. 61, 154–158. doi: 10.1177/0706743715616609
Lang, L. (2024). The role of emotional intelligence in the therapeutic process of counselling psychology. Communic. Hum. Res. 39, 123–128. doi: 10.54254/2753-7064/39/20242214
Langley, E. L., Clark, G., Murray, C., and Wootton, B. M. (2021). The utility of the health belief model variables in predicting help-seeking intention for depressive symptoms. Aust. Psychol. 56, 233–244. doi: 10.1080/00050067.2021.1893598
Lannin, D. G., Vogel, D. L., Brenner, R. E., Abraham, W. T., and Heath, P. J. (2016). Does self-stigma reduce the probability of seeking mental health information? J. Couns. Psychol. 63, 351–358. doi: 10.1037/cou0000108
Lauber, C., Ajdacic-Gross, V., Fritschi, N., Stulz, N., and Rössler, W. (2005). Mental health literacy in an educational elite – An online survey among university students. BMC Public Health 5:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-44
Lauzier-Jobin, F., and Houle, J. (2022). A comparison of formal and informal help in the context of mental health recovery. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 68, 729–737. doi: 10.1177/00207640211004988
Leamy, M., Bird, V., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., and Slade, M. (2011). Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br. J. Psychiatry 199, 445–452. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733
Levula, A., Wilson, A., and Harré, M. (2016). The association between social network factors and mental health at different life stages. Qual. Life Res. 25, 1725–1733. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1200-7
Lien, Y. J., Chen, L., Cai, J., Wang, Y. H., and Liu, Y. Y. (2024). The power of knowledge: how mental health literacy can overcome barriers to seeking help. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 94, 127–147. doi: 10.1037/ort0000708
Lindow, J. C., Hughes, J. L., South, C., Minhajuddin, A., Gutierrez, L., Bannister, E., et al. (2020). The youth aware of mental health intervention: impact on help seeking, mental health knowledge, and stigma in U.S. adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 67, 101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.01.006
Link, B. G., and Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 363–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363
Liu, Q., Jiang, M., Li, S., and Yang, Y. (2021). Social support, resilience, and self-esteem protect against common mental health problems in early adolescence: a nonrecursive analysis from a two-year longitudinal study. Medicine 100:e24334. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024334
Livingston, J. D. (2020). Structural stigma in health-care contexts for people with mental health and substance use issues: a literature review. Ottawa: Mental Health Commission of Canada.
Lynch, L., Moorhead, A., Long, M., and Hawthorne-Steele, I. (2023). The role of informal sources of help in young people’s access to, engagement with, and maintenance in professional mental health care—a scoping review. J. Child Fam. Stud. 32, 3350–3365. doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02498-5
Mak, W. W., Poon, C. Y., Pun, L. Y., and Cheung, S. F. (2007). Meta-analysis of stigma and mental health. Soc. Sci. Med. 65, 245–261. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.015
Maulik, P. K., Eaton, W. W., and Bradshaw, C. P. (2010). The effect of social networks and social support on common mental disorders following specific life events. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 122, 118–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.1511.x
Maulik, P. K., Eaton, W. W., and Bradshaw, C. P. (2011). The effect of social networks and social support on mental health services use, following a life event, among the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area cohort. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 38, 29–50. doi: 10.1007/s11414-009-9205-z
Mayer, J. D., and Salovey, V. (1997). “What is emotional intelligence” in Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators. eds. P. Salovey and D. Sluyter. (New York: Basic Books, New York), 3–31.
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D., Salovey, P., and Bar-On, R. (2000). “Electing a measure of emotional intelligence: the case of ability scales” in The handbook of emotional intelligence, eds. R. Bar-On, and J. D. A. Parker (Jossey-Bass/Wiley), 320–342.
Mayer, J. D., and Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Appl. Prevent. Psychol. 4, 197–208. doi: 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80058-7
McCann, T. V., Mugavin, J., Renzaho, A., and Lubman, D. I. (2016). Sub-Saharan African migrant youths’ help-seeking barriers and facilitators for mental health and substance use problems: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 16, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0984-5
Miles, R., Rabin, L., Krishnan, A., Grandoit, E., and Kloskowski, K. (2020). Mental health literacy in a diverse sample of undergraduate students: demographic, psychological, and academic correlates. BMC Public Health 20:1699. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09696-0
Moroz, N., Moroz, I., and D'Angelo, M. S. (2020). Mental health services in Canada: barriers and cost-effective solutions to increase access. Healthc. Manage. Forum 33, 282–287. doi: 10.1177/0840470420933911
Murray, J. K., and Knudson, S. (2023). Mental health treatment and access for emerging adults in Canada: a systematic review. Front. Public Health 11:1088999. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1088999
Nash, S., Sixbey, M., An, S., and Puig, A. (2017). University students' perceived need for mental health services: a study of variables related to not seeking help. Psychol. Serv. 14, 502–512. doi: 10.1037/ser0000172
O'Connor, M., and Casey, L. (2015). The mental health literacy scale (MHLS): a new scale-based measure of mental health literacy. Psychiatry Res. 229, 511–516. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.064
Oliver, J. M., Reed, C. K. S., Katz, B. M., and Haugh, J. A. (1999). Students’ self-reports of help-seeking: the impact of psychological problems, stress, and demographic variables on utilization of formal and informal support. Soc. Behav. Pers. 27, 109–128. doi: 10.2224/sbp.1999.27.2.109
Petrides, K. V. (2009). “Psychometric properties of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (TEIQue)” in Assessing emotional intelligence. eds. J. Parker, D. Saklofske, and C. Stough (Boston, MA: Springer).
Petrides, K. V., Mikolajczak, M., Mavroveli, S., Sanchez-Ruiz, M.-J., Furnham, A., and Pérez-González, J.-C. (2016). Developments in trait emotional intelligence research. Emot. Rev. 8, 335–341. doi: 10.1177/1754073916650493
Planey, A. M., Smith, S. M., Moore, S., and Walker, T. D. (2019). Barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking among African American youth and their families: a systematic review study. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 101, 190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.04.001
Richard, J., Rebinsky, R., Suresh, R., Kubic, S., Carter, A., Cunningham, J. E. A., et al. (2022). Scoping review to evaluate the effects of peer support on the mental health of young adults. BMJ Open 12:e061336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061336
Rickwood, D., and Thomas, K. (2012). Conceptual measurement framework for help-seeking for mental health problems. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 5, 173–183. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S38707
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., and Palfai, T. P. (1995). “Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: exploring emotional intelligence using the trait Meta-mood scale” in Emotion, disclosure, and health. ed. J. W. Pennebaker (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 125–154.
Saltzman, L. Y., Hansel, T. C., and Bordnick, P. S. (2020). Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 12, S55–S57. doi: 10.1037/tra0000703
Samar, N., and Perveen, A. (2021). Relationship between mental health literacy and help seeking behavior among undergraduate students. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 11, 216–230. doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10113
Sarrionandia, A., and Mikolajczak, M. (2019). A meta-analysis of the possible behavioural and biological variables linking trait emotional intelligence to health. Health Psychol. Rev. 14, 220–244. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1641423
Scott, H. R., Pitman, A., Kozhuharova, P., and Lloyd-Evans, B. (2020). A systematic review of studies describing the influence of informal social support on psychological wellbeing in people bereaved by sudden or violent causes of death. BMC Psychiatry 20, 1–20. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02639-4
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 12, 1–36. doi: 10.1080/14792772143000003
Smetanin, P., Briante, C., Stiff, D., Ahmad, S., and Khan, M. (2011). The life and economic impact of major mental illnesses in Canada. Ottawa: Mental Health Commission of Canada.
Smith, C. L., and Shochet, I. M. (2011). The impact of mental health literacy on help-seeking intentions: results of a pilot study with first year psychology students. Int. J. Ment. Health Promot. 13, 14–20. doi: 10.1080/14623730.2011.9715652
Southwick, S. M., Vythilingam, M., and Charney, D. S. (2005). The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: implications for prevention and treatment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 1, 255–291. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143948
Stephenson, E. (2023) Mental disorders and access to mental health care. Insights on Canadian society. (75-006-X), Statistics Canada. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2023001/article/00011-eng.pdf (Accessed January 22, 2024).
Sunderland, A., and Findlay, L. C. (2013). Perceived need for mental health care in Canada: results from the 2012 Canadian community health survey-mental health. Health Rep. 24, 3–9.
Tew, J., Ramon, S., Slade, M., Bird, V., Melton, J., and Le Boutillier, C. (2012). Social factors and recovery from mental health difficulties: a review of the evidence. Br. J. Soc. Work 42, 443–460. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr076
Tucker, J. R., Hammer, J. H., Vogel, D. L., Bitman, R. L., Wade, N. G., and Maier, E. J. (2013). Disentangling self-stigma: are mental illness and help-seeking self-stigmas different? J. Couns. Psychol. 60, 520–531. doi: 10.1037/a0033555
Vickery, A. (2021). Men's help-seeking for distress: navigating varied pathways and practices. Front. Sociol. 6:724843. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.724843
Vogel, D. L., Wade, N. G., and Haake, S. (2006). Measuring the self-stigma associated with seeking psychological help. J. Couns. Psychol. 53, 325–337. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.325
Wang, H., Feng, Z., Zheng, Z., and Yang, J. (2024). Chinese undergraduates’ mental health help-seeking behavior: the health belief model. Front. Psychol. 15:1377669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1377669
Waqas, A., Malik, S., Fida, A., Abbas, N., Mian, N., Miryala, S., et al. (2020). Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review. Psychiatry Q. 91, 887–903. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09751-4
Wei, Y., McGrath, P. J., Hayden, J., and Kutcher, S. (2015). Mental health literacy measures evaluating knowledge, attitudes, and help-seeking: a scoping review. BMC Psychiatry 15:291. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0681-9
White, S., Foster, R., Marks, J., Morshead, R., Goldsmith, L., Barlow, S., et al. (2020). The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 20:534. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3
Whyte, M. (2021). Mental health literacy and its relationship with help-seeking behaviours in adolescents: a retrospective study. Winnepeg, MA: University of Manitoba.
Yiu, E. K. L., Wong, S. M. Y., Leung, D. K. Y., Liu, T., Chan, W. C., Wong, G. H. Y., et al. (2025). Formal and informal sources of social support and their differential associations with intervention outcomes for depressive and anxiety symptoms among older adults. J. Affect. Disord. 389:119696. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119696
Yonemoto, N., and Kawashima, Y. (2023). Help-seeking behaviors for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 323, 85–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.043
Zachrisson, H. D., Rödje, K., and Mykletun, A. (2006). Utilization of health services in relation to mental health problems in adolescents: a population based survey. BMC Public Health 6, 7–34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-34
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., and Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering baron and kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consum. Res. 37, 197–206. doi: 10.1086/651257
Keywords: mental health literacy, help-seeking, stigma, emotional intelligence, mental health
Citation: Awan M, Boyce MA and Lindsay BL (2025) Mental health literacy and help-seeking: the mediating role of self-stigma and emotional intelligence. Front. Psychol. 16:1589093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1589093
Edited by:
Mike Z. Yao, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United StatesReviewed by:
Gengchun Li, Taizhou University, ChinaWeizi Liu, Texas Christian University, United States
Copyright © 2025 Awan, Boyce and Lindsay. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mahd Awan, bWFoZC5hd2FuQHVjYWxnYXJ5LmNh