Bingzhou Chen
Haixia Li
Ruiyun Zhang3,4- 1Graduate School of Education, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China
- 2School of Sport Management, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China
- 3College of Sports and Arts, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, China
- 4College of Physical Education and Health, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
Objective: Current understanding of peer support’s role in swimmers’ mental toughness development remains limited. Guided by Bandura’s social cognitive theory, explores the relationship between peer support and the mental toughness of adolescent swimmers, along with self-efficacy’s mediating effect.
Methods: This study used a quantitative cross-sectional design. A total of 161 adolescent swimmers, aged 10–18 years, participated in the research. Data on participants’ peer support, self-efficacy, and mental toughness were collected through questionnaire surveys. The data were analyzed using hierarchical linear regression, and mediation effects were tested with the bootstrapping method.
Results: Studies have shown peer support, self-efficacy, and mental toughness showed significant intercorrelations. Mediation analysis confirmed that self-efficacy fully mediated the relationship between peer support and mental toughness: while peer support initially predicted mental toughness (β = 0.224, p < 0.01), its direct effect diminished (β = 0.107, p > 0.05) when self-efficacy (β = 0.418, p < 0.001) was included. The significant indirect effect via self-efficacy thereby highlights its role as the key mechanism through which peer support enhances mental toughness.
Conclusion: Research has demonstrated that the presence of peer support is significantly positively correlated with mental toughness. Self-efficacy plays a mediating role between peer support and mental toughness.
1 Introduction
Mental toughness is a critical factor for success in competitive sports (Gucciardi, 2017). Competitive swimming places extremely high demands on athletes, such as undergoing extensive training, enduring tremendous pressure (Alvarez et al., 2021), and coping with the physical and mental fatigue associated with long-term aquatic conditioning (de Lima-Júnior et al., 2025). Therefore, in such high-pressure athletic contexts, the cultivation of mental toughness becomes paramount for sustained performance excellence (Nicholls et al., 2011; Zalewska et al., 2019). Bandura's (1986) social cognitive theory proposes a triadic reciprocal interaction among environmental influences, cognitive processes, and behavioral outcomes, wherein personal factors, behaviors, and environments bidirectionally shape one another (Bandura, 2001).
Mental toughness, characterized as a dynamic psychological resource enabling consistent high-level performance despite varying situational demands and adversities (Gucciardi, 2017; Gucciardi et al., 2015). This mental edge allows athletes to maintain focus, confidence, and goal pursuit while excelling under competitive pressures (Gucciardi et al., 2015), and enables adolescent swimmers to sustain self-confidence post-failure while actively recovering from performance troughs (Meggs and Chen, 2019). Beyond competitive advantages, mental toughness serves as a buffer for psychological well-being, enhancing swimmers’ motivation and training dedication while mitigating their exhaustion and burnout risks (Tian et al., 2022). Studies indicate that mental toughness varies by gender, age, and competitive level (Nicholls et al., 2009). Key influencing factors include team cohesion, social support, and resilience traits, with the satisfaction of basic psychological needs being significantly correlated with mental toughness development in young swimmers (Lou et al., 2014). The formation mechanisms of mental toughness are diversely interpreted. Hu and Gan (2008) process model frames mental toughness through two dimensions: personal strength including internal factors like goal focus and emotional control, and supportive force encompassing external factors like peer support and coach guidance.
Notably, self-efficacy refers to an individual’s belief in their capability to take specific actions to achieve set goals (Bandura, 1977, 1997), which aligns with the dimension of internal factors proposed by Hu and Gan (2008). Self-efficacy can enhance the motivation and performance of adolescent swimmers in their training (Wang et al., 2025). Studies also show that self-efficacy and mental toughness are strongly correlated (Ali et al., 2024), and sports contexts further strengthen this relationship (Rogowska et al., 2022).
Bandura’s (1986) social cognitive theory conceptualizes self-efficacy as its core. The present study positions self-efficacy as the mediator converting aquatic-specific peer interactions into mental toughness development. Social cognitive theory is grounded in human agency, the intentional capacity to regulate actions and modify environments to achieve goals (Bandura, 2001). This dual emphasis on contextual adaptability and proactive self-regulation explains validating the robustness of social cognitive theory in modeling adaptive behaviors across dynamic environments (Ramolale et al., 2021). Moreover, according to Bandura's (1986) social cognitive theory and previous research findings, self-efficacy is also influenced by peer support, which in turn affects mental toughness (Huang, 2023).
Peer support involves sharing emotions, experiences, and skills with age-similar peers sharing comparable life contexts (Moran et al., 2012). It encompasses beneficial impacts from peer interactions (Zou et al., 2023), motivates adolescent swimmers’ life and training choices (Finnerty et al., 2010), and creates supportive spaces for collaborative knowledge exchange and identity formation (Lee and Hung, 2024). Peer support exerts a significant influence on both the sport motivation and career burnout of adolescent swimmers (Alvarez et al., 2021). This phenomenon aligns with the support dimension outlined by Hu and Gan (2008).
While swimming is typically classified as an individual sport, swimmers do their training and even competitions as a team. These teenage swimmers spend a considerable amount of time at the training venue every day, resulting in them having frequent interactions with their teammates. This environment fosters social connections with teammates (Chan et al., 2012). In this situation, peer support becomes particularly important (Eccles, 1999). All athletes will receive support from their teammates, families, teachers and coaches, families and educators offer spoken social reinforcement, while peers engage in interactive social support (Pan et al., 2022). Examining peer support in adolescent swimmers helps clarify how aquatic training environments influence adaptive behavioral development, while contributing to social cognitive theory’s exploration of environmental inputs within its (Bandura, 2001). However, the question of how such increasingly frequent peer interactions during adolescence can shape mental toughness through water-based team training remains to be explored at present.
Adolescence is a crucial developmental stage where peer influence intensifies (Arnett, 1999; Berndt, 1979), making mental toughness a critical psychological resource for young athletes navigating future challenges (Chen et al., 2015). Basic psychological needs satisfaction further reinforces mental toughness (Mahoney et al., 2014), highlighting the interplay between supportive environments and mental toughness. In sports contexts peer derived social support enhances adaptive resilience and pressure management, synergizing with mental toughness to fortify competitive readiness (Laird et al., 2018). Research on adolescent swimmers has also examined knowledge, lifestyle, and behavioral factors influencing their development (AlKasasbeh et al., 2024; AlKasasbeh and Akroush, 2024). However, peer support effects vary significantly with team relational dynamics (Pacewicz et al., 2019). Despite adolescent swimmers extensive team exposure during training and competitions peer supports role remains underexplored. First prior research emphasizes individual traits (Chen and Cheesman, 2013; Gucciardi et al., 2015; Tian et al., 2022) or parental and coach influences (Nicholls et al., 2016; Vega-Díaz and González-García, 2024), while neglecting team-based peer interactions. Second existing work focuses on land-based projects with verbal encouragement (Khayati et al., 2024; Hammami et al., 2021), yet the exploration of aquatic training environments remains comparatively limited.
Bandura’s (1986) social cognitive theory provides an explanatory framework for competitive sports. Due to water based physical isolation swimmers rely on asynchronous and pre strategic peer support. Key mechanisms include pre race technical exchanges for example relay handoff optimization post training video analysis and post race debriefings. Through systematic integration of these peer interactions swimmers develop cognitive models for challenge management enhancing mental toughness via repeated peer engagement and experiential accumulation.
Kumalasari (2023) demonstrated that peer support in academic settings enhances students’ capacity to overcome academic difficulties and adapt to severe challenges. A similar effect may also exist in a sports environment.
For adolescent swimmers, peer support functions as an environmental input that elevates self-efficacy, a core cognitive process. This enhanced self-efficacy subsequently fosters mental toughness, the adaptive behavioral outcome. While the present study focuses on the directional pathway from environmental input to adaptive outcome, the triadic structure inherently aligns with SCT’s principle of dynamic interdependence (Bandura, 2001).
Based on Bandura’s (1986) social cognitive theory, self-efficacy mediates the peer support-mental toughness relationship through vicarious experiences and verbal persuasion. When adolescent swimmers observe teammates overcoming challenges or receive affirming peer evaluations, they internalize “I can do it” beliefs, enhancing self-efficacy. Yu et al. (2024) pointed out in their research, athletes who demonstrate a higher degree of mental toughness usually perform better under pressures. This heightened self-efficacy directly translates to mental toughness, enabling athletes to navigate competitive demands.
Critically, however, the absence of such mental toughness carries significant risks for athletic development. Insufficient mental toughness may not only contribute to a decline in competitive performance among adolescent swimmers, but also significantly impair their capacity to cope with adversity, adversely affect their decision-making under pressure, and diminish motivation, among other negative outcomes (Meggs and Chen, 2018; Moreira et al., 2021; Anthony et al., 2020). Given these challenges, the present study operationalized the core tenets of Bandura’s theory into a tailored framework specific to competitive swimming. The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between peer support and mental toughness was delineated, thereby informing the development of evidence-based targeted training regimens and psychological interventions for coaches and sports psychologists to foster athletes’ adaptive capacities. In light of the aforementioned evidence, this paper proposes the research hypothesis:
H1: Peer support significantly predicts mental toughness in adolescent swimming athletes.
H2: Self-efficacy plays a mediating role between peer support and the mental toughness of adolescent swimmers.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Research design
Based on the social cognitive theory, the present study employs a quantitative cross-sectional approach to investigate how peer support within swimming-specific environments enhances mental toughness among adolescent competitive swimmers through the mediating role of self-efficacy. The participants consist of youth athletes engaged in professional swim team training programs, typically involving 10–12 sessions per week, each lasting 2.5 h.
The study operationalizes its key variables as follows: peer support is conceptualized as a multifaceted environmental factor encompassing emotional, informational, and motivational exchanges within the swim team setting; self-efficacy represents the central cognitive mediator, reflecting athletes’ beliefs in their capabilities to perform and persevere under demanding training conditions; and mental toughness is regarded as the critical outcome variable, characterized by the ability to maintain focus, manage pressure, and recover effectively from setbacks in both training and competition.
The mediation model, which synthesizes the research, is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. A hypothetical model of peer support affecting mental toughness.
2.2 Participants
A total of 170 athletes aged 10–18 years from 3 municipal swimming teams in Shandong Province participated in this study. After screening, 9 invalid questionnaires were excluded, comprising 5 due to incomplete responses, 3 failing to meet the minimum age requirement of 10 years, and 1 exceeding the maximum age limit of 18 years. A total of 161 valid samples were retained, yielding a retention rate of 94.7%. The sample comprised 70 males and 91 females, with a mean age of 14 ± 2.5 years, categorized into three age groups: 10–12 years (n = 56), 13–15 years (n = 50), and 16–18 years (n = 55). Training experience spanned four tiers: <1 year (n = 6), 1–3 years (n = 52), 4–6 years (n = 62), and >7 years (n = 41). Athlete grades included non-elite athlete (n = 27), second grade athlete (n = 74), first grade athlete (n = 52), and national master of sports (n = 8).
2.3 Procedures
Prior to the survey, a contextualized scenario was designed to simulate an ecologically valid swimming-specific environment, aligning with our social cognitive theory framework. This approach helped operationalize the key variables under study. Participants were asked to imagine having just finished a typical 2.5-h training session with peers, with a championship scheduled in 14 days. This scenario reflects the high-performance context of the sampled swimmers and effectively elicits the target constructs: peer support, mental toughness, and self-efficacy. Well-validated scales were used to measure these constructs, selected based on their alignment with our variable definitions and established reliability for athletic populations. To control for order effects, we administered the questionnaire using Questionnaire Star’s randomization feature, which varied item order across participants while keeping content consistent.
2.4 Data collection
2.4.1 Peer support assessment
The peer support scale was adopted from the 10-item single-factor scale validated by Hsu et al. (2011) for adolescent populations, which originated from the Social Support for Exercise Scale (Sallis et al., 1987), to measure peer support for mental toughness. An example of one item is, “My friends gave me encouragement to stick with my swimming training” (see Table 1 for details). A 7-point Likert scale was used ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to7(strongly agree). Reliability tests demonstrated robust internal consistency for the refined scale, with Cronbach’s α = 0.81, composite reliability (CR) = 0.88, and average variance extracted (AVE) = 0.70.
Table 1. Scale items, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, and source references.
2.4.2 Mental toughness assessment
The Mental Toughness Index developed by Gucciardi et al. (2015) was adopted, which asks athletes to assess the degree to which each item in this scale reflects their own thinking patterns, feelings, and behaviors in their sport. For example, “I believe in my ability to achieve my goals” (see Table 1 for details). Reliability tests demonstrated robust internal consistency for the refined scale, with Cronbach’s α = 0.87, composite reliability (CR) = 0.89, and average variance extracted (AVE) = 0.62.
2.4.3 Self-efficacy assessment
The scale used in this study was derived from the work of Yu et al. (2024), who updated and validated the General Self-Efficacy Scale. The purpose of this scale is to measure the self-efficacy of individuals in various tasks, and it has been proven to be brief, easy to use, reliable and effective. This questionnaire has a unidimensional structure and is used to measure the overall and generalized self-efficacy of individuals. For example, “If I do my best, I’ll always be able to finish even the most difficult training tasks” (see Table 1 for details). Reliability tests demonstrated robust internal consistency for the refined scale, with Cronbach’s α = 0.88, composite reliability (CR) = 0.89, and average variance extracted (AVE) = 0.67.
2.4.4 Data analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 (Released 2022, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).
To examine the predictive relationships among variables, hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0. The analysis employed a three-step hierarchical approach: Model 1 included control variables (gender, age, training years, athlete grade); Model 2 added peer support to assess its direct effect on mental toughness; Model 3 further incorporated self-efficacy to evaluate its mediating role. All models used enter method for variable inclusion.
To test the mediating role of self-efficacy between peer support and mental toughness, Model 4 (simple mediation) analysis was conducted using the SPSS PROCESS macro with 5,000 bootstrap resamples (95% bias-corrected confidence intervals), controlling for gender, age, training years, and athlete grade.
3 Results
3.1 Measurement model assessment and variable characteristics
Characteristics Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the measurement model. Descriptive, composite reliability, and correlation analyses were performed on all constructs. All constructs were measured on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree), with peer support showing a mean score of (M = 5.38, SD = 1.56), mental toughness (M = 5.34, SD = 1.46), and self-efficacy (M = 5.02, SD = 1.66) all demonstrating moderately high scores. Composite reliability (CR) values exceeded the threshold of 0.70 for all constructs: peer support (CR = 0.88), mental toughness (CR = 0.89), and self-efficacy (CR = 0.89) (Hair et al., 2010). Significant correlations (p < 0.01) were observed: peer support strongly correlated with mental toughness (r = 0.23) and self-efficacy (r = 0.28), while mental toughness and self-efficacy showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.46). These results provide preliminary support for H1. Complete statistical details are provided in Table 2.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics, composite reliability, and validity assessment.
3.2 Hierarchical regression analysis
A hierarchical regression analysis was performed to examine the predictors of mental toughness. In Model 1 (gender, age, training years, athlete grade), only age (β = 0.23, t = 2.07, p < 0.05) and training years (β = −0.23, t = −2.04, p < 0.05) significantly predicted mental toughness, with R2 = 0.04 (adjusted R2 = 0.02). Adding peer support in Model 2 increased R2 to 0.09 (ΔR2 = 0.05), peer support emerged as a significant predictor (β = 0.22, t = 2.91, p < 0.01), while age remained significant (β = 0.22, t = 2.02, p < 0.05). Further including self-efficacy in Model 3 increased R2 to 0.25 (ΔR2 = 0.16, p < 0.001), with self-efficacy as the strongest predictor (β = 0.42, t = 5.71, p < 0.001). Peer support’s effect became non-significant in Model 3 (β = 0.11, t = 1.46). These results indicate that self-efficacy fully mediates the effect of peer support on mental toughness. These results indicate that self-efficacy fully mediates the effect of peer support on mental toughness, supporting H1 and providing preliminary evidence for H2. Complete statistical details are provided in Table 3.
Table 3. Hierarchical regression analysis.
3.3 Mediation analysis
Mediation analysis confirmed that the total effect of peer support on mental toughness was significant [β = 0.21, 95% CI (0.07, 0.35)]. The direct effect became non-significant after controlling for self-efficacy [β = 0.10, 95% CI (−0.04, 0.24)], while the indirect effect through self-efficacy remained significant [β = 0.11, 95% CI (0.04, 0.20)]. The absence of zero in the indirect effect’s CI and the non-significant direct effect confirm full mediation, thereby validating Hypothesis H2. Complete statistical details are provided in Table 4.
Table 4. Mediation analysis results.
4 Discussion
Guided by Bandura’s (1986) Social Cognitive Theory, this study aims to investigate the mechanism through which peer support influences mental toughness among adolescent swimmers. The primary objective is to examine the mediating role of self-efficacy in this relationship, thereby enhancing adolescent swimmers’ mental toughness in high-pressure competitive environments. The findings and implications will be discussed in detail in the following section.
4.1 The relationship between peer support and mental toughness
The particular effectiveness of peer support in swimming may stem from the sport’s unique training structure, where adolescent swimmers train, compete, and spend prolonged time together, creating natural opportunities for observational learning and mutual encouragement. The repetitive and demanding nature of swim training creates frequent opportunities for peers to model resilience and provide real-time feedback. This context helps explain why the role of peer assistance in strengthening stress-coping capacities, as noted by Robinson et al. (2015), is particularly relevant in competitive swimming.
Our findings demonstrate a positive relationship between peer support and mental toughness in competitive swimming, aligning with previous research on social support in athletic settings. Such consistency with existing literature may be attributed to the fundamental human need for social connection and validation. This result echoes (Kumalasari’s, 2023) findings regarding academic resilience, possibly because both athletic and academic environments create performance pressures that activate similar social support mechanisms. It also reinforces the broader evidence on social support and mental toughness established by Jones et al. (2002). Similar to studies by Connaughton et al. (2010) and Dawson and Pooley (2013), which emphasized the importance of diverse social support sources, this study suggests that peer support serves as a key resource within swimming teams.
4.2 The relationship between self-efficacy, peer support, and mental toughness
Studies have shown that peer support can significantly predict self-efficacy, a result consistent with Zou et al. (2023) who demonstrated its positive effect on teenagers’ self-belief. This relationship is particularly evident in swimming teams, where close peer relationships markedly enhance self-efficacy. The underlying mechanisms may be understood through several factors specific to aquatic training settings, including the experience of wellbeing through shared training, secure attachment patterns within the team, and motivation through mutual encouragement, which collectively explain how peer support builds swimmers’ confidence. During swim training, peers frequently provide encouragement through verbal praise (Pan et al., 2021), while positive social interactions during practice enhance self-efficacy by boosting subjective wellbeing (Shaffer, 2005). Furthermore, consistent with Bowlby’s attachment theory, swimmers developing secure attachments to their training groups perceive stronger social support, creating psychological foundations that foster self-efficacy in aquatic environments (Wilson and Rodgers, 2004).
Research also confirms that self-efficacy significantly predicts mental toughness in swimmers, aligning with Brace et al. (2020) who observed similar effects in endurance athletes. In swimming, this relationship manifests through athletes’ enhanced capacity to cope with rigorous training and competitive pressures. Although Meggs et al. (2014) primarily attributed mental toughness to core self-evaluations, their inclusion of self-efficacy within this framework suggests its mediating role in resilience development, particularly relevant in swimming where sustained self-confidence determines athletes’ ability to persevere through demanding aquatic training.
4.3 The mediating role of self-efficacy
Building on existing evidence, our study explored a potential peer support pathway in swimming that is fully mediated. Peer support enhances the mental toughness of adolescent swimmers by strengthening their self-efficacy, these findings resonate with Shi et al. (2025), who demonstrated that social support influences youth athletes’ engagement through a chain mediation pathway. While their model extends to broader behavioral outcomes, both studies share a core mechanism: peer interactions foster efficacy beliefs, which in turn cultivate mental toughness.
While Fletcher and Sarkar’s (2014) dynamic model emphasizes resilience as a process shaped by protective factors, it lacks specificity on how peer interactions translate into cognitive adaptations. Within youth swimming settings, our findings extend this model by demonstrating that peer support operates through social cognitive mechanisms such as observational learning by emulating high-performing peers (Bandura, 2001), which collectively strengthen young swimmers’ self-efficacy beliefs. From the perspective of social cognition theory, this study investigates peer support as a catalyst in a cognitive behavioral process, where verbal encouragement from teammates enhances self-efficacy, thereby promoting goal directed efforts that ultimately strengthen mental toughness in young swimmers. Importantly, this integration provides empirical refinement to Freeman and Rees’ (2009) social support model, while their foundational work proposed a support to efficacy to outcomes pathway. The current study demonstrates, through the lens of social cognitive theory, how peer support enhances mental toughness in aquatic training environments. Specifically, environmental cues such as verbal encouragement during drills initiate cognitive appraisals centered on self-efficacy, which drive behavioral regulation manifested as goal-directed effort, ultimately fostering adaptive outcomes characterized by mental toughness in competitive young swimmers.
4.4 Practical applications and implications
To apply the findings, coaches can design simple, swim-specific activities that focus on building self-efficacy through peer interactions, ultimately improving mental toughness. First, during the training process, swimmers are divided into groups. They are filmed using smartphones or underwater cameras, and they discuss ways to optimize their techniques, translating peer support into incremental mastery experiences that directly strengthen self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997). Second, hold weekly team relays to boost unity, where swimmers must collaborate closely and verbally encourage each other. Track teamwork metrics like encouragement frequency and relay times in a shared training diary, reinforcing collective efficacy beliefs through visible progress toward shared goals. Third, simulate high-resistance conditions during relay tasks, where teammates rotate roles in overcoming physical challenges. After training, discuss how peer encouragement helped them persist under fatigue, explicitly framing these interactions as evidence that we can overcome tough conditions together, a core mechanism linking peer support to mental toughness via self-efficacy. These evidence-based intervention strategies may offer practical pathways for translating the fully mediated relationship into structured approaches, potentially providing coaches with actionable methods to support the development of self-efficacy and mental toughness in youth swimmers within authentic training scenarios.
4.5 Limitations and future research directions
Although this research has made certain contributions in both theory and practice, there are still some shortcomings. First, the cross-sectional design inherently restricts causal inferences between variables, and the analytical focus on a single pathway may not fully capture the multifaceted dynamic interactions inherent in social cognitive processes. Second, the findings are primarily situated within a specific cultural context, focusing on Chinese adolescent swimmers, who typically train in collectivist environments. This cultural specificity is noteworthy, as values and expressions of social interaction likely differ from those in individualistic cultures. Consequently, the support among peers may vary when dealing with stressful situations. Third, the study focused solely on positive peer interactions, overlooking potential negative peer influences that coexist in team environments. As the duration of interactions with peers grows, the chance of encountering adverse peer engagements intensifies.
To address these limitations, First, longitudinal studies can clarify whether peer support predicts mental toughness over time and how they may influence each other. Second, future research should test the model’s generalizability across sports and cultures where peer dynamics may differ. Finally, investigating how supportive and detrimental peer behaviors jointly shape self-efficacy and resilience could refine intervention designs. Addressing these gaps will enhance theoretical precision and practical relevance across diverse athletic populations.
5 Conclusion
The results indicate that the presence of peer support is significantly positively correlated with mental toughness. Self-efficacy was found to fully mediate this relationship. Therefore, it is suggested that coaches incorporate structured peer support activities into training to enhance athletes’ self-efficacy, thus strengthening their mental toughness.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Sports Science Ethics Committee of Shandong Sports University (No2023024). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
BC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HL: Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RZ: Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
We extend our heartfelt thanks to all the jocks who took part in this study. At the same time, we want to give a shout-out to everyone who played a role in disseminating and gathering the surveys.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ali, S. A. O., Alenezi, A., Kamel, F., and Mostafa, M. H. (2024). Health locus of control, resilience and self-efficacy among elderly patients with psychiatric disorders. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 33, 616–623. doi: 10.1111/inm.13263
AlKasasbeh, W., and Akroush, S. (2024). Investigating the interrelationships among food habits, sports nutrition knowledge, and perceived barriers to healthy eating: a study of adolescent swimmers. Front. Nutr. 11:1381801. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1381801
AlKasasbeh, W. J., Alawamleh, T., and Alrahahleh, W. A. (2024). Investigating nutrition literacy levels among adolescent swimmers. Int. J. Hum. Mov. Sports Sci. 12, 403–417. doi: 10.13189/saj.2024.120215
Alvarez, O., Tormo-Barahona, L., Castillo, I., and Moreno-Murcia, J. A. (2021). Examining controlling styles of significant others and their implications for motivation, boredom and burnout in young swimmers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:e5828. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115828
Anthony, D. R., Gordon, S., and Gucciardi, D. F. (2020). A qualitative exploration of mentally tough behaviour in Australian football. J. Sports Sci. 38, 308–319. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1698002
Arnett, J. J. (1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. Am. Psychol. 54, 317–326. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.5.317
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Berndt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Dev. Psychol. 15, 608–616. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.15.6.608
Brace, A. W., George, K., and Lovell, G. P. (2020). Mental toughness and self-efficacy of elite ultra-marathon runners. PLoS One 15:e0241286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241284
Chan, D. K., Lonsdale, C., and Fung, H. H. (2012). Influences of coaches, parents, and peers on the motivational patterns of child and adolescent athletes. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 22, 558–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01277.x
Chen, L. H., Kee, Y. H., and Chen, M. Y. (2015). Why grateful adolescent athletes are more satisfied with their life: the mediating role of perceived team cohesion. Soc. Indic. Res. 124, 463–476. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0798-0
Chen, M. A., and Cheesman, D. J. (2013). Mental toughness of mixed martial arts athletes at different levels of competition. Percept. Mot. Skills 116, 905–917. doi: 10.2466/29.30.pms.116.3.905-917
Connaughton, D., Hanton, S., and Jones, G. (2010). The development and maintenance of mental toughness in the world’s best performers. Sport Psychol. 24, 168–193. doi: 10.1123/tsp.24.2.168
Dawson, M., and Pooley, J. A. (2013). Resilience: the role of optimism, perceived parental autonomy support and perceived social support in first year university students. J. Educ. Train. Stud. 1: 38–46. doi: 10.11114/jets.v1i2.137
de Lima-Júnior, D., Caporaso, G., Cortesi, M., Fortes, L. D., and Marcora, S. M. (2025). Effects of mental fatigue on perception of effort and performance in national level swimmers. Front. Psychol. 16:1520156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1520156
Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. Futur. Child. 9, 30–45. doi: 10.2307/1602703
Finnerty, T., Reeves, S., Dabinett, J., Jeanes, Y. M., and Vögele, C. (2010). Effects of peer influence on dietary intake and physical activity in schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr. 13, 376–383. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009991315
Fletcher, D., and Sarkar, M. (2014). Psychological resilience in sport performers: a review of stressors and protective factors. J. Sports Sci. 32, 1419–1432. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.901551
Freeman, P., and Rees, T. (2009). How does perceived support lead to better performance? An examination of potential mechanisms. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 21, 429–441. doi: 10.1080/10413200903222913
Gucciardi, D. F. (2017). Mental toughness: progress and prospects. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 16, 17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.010
Gucciardi, D. F., Gordon, S., Mallett, C. J., Hanton, S., and Temby, P. (2015). The concept of mental toughness: tests of dimensionality, nomological network, and traitness. J. Pers. 83, 26–44. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12079
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th Edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hammami, R., Nebigh, A., Selmi, M. A., Rebai, H., Versic, S., Drid, P., et al. (2021). Acute effects of verbal encouragement and listening to preferred music on maximal repeated change-of-direction performance in adolescent elite basketball players—preliminary report. Appl. Sci. 11:8625. doi: 10.3390/app11188625
Huang, Y. J. (2023). Examining the relationship between peer support and foreign language emotions in online learning: the mediating effect of self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 14:1148472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148472
Hsu, Y. W., Chou, C. P., Nguyen-Rodriguez, S. T., McClain, A. D., Belcher, B. R., and Spruijt-Metz, D. (2011). Influences of social support, perceived barriers, and negative meanings of physical activity on physical activity in middle school students. J. Phys. Act. Health 8, 210–219. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.2.210
Hu, Y., and Gan, Y. (2008). Development and psychometric validity of the resilience scale for Chinese adolescents. Acta Psychol. Sin, 40, 902–912. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00902
Jones, G., Hanton, S., and Connaughton, D. (2002). What is this thing called mental toughness? An investigation of elite sport performers. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 14, 205–218. doi: 10.1080/10413200290103509
Khayati, A., Sahli, F., Ghouili, H., Labbadi, R., Selmi, O., Sahli, H., et al. (2024). Effects of coach-delivered verbal encouragement on the physiological and psychological responses of adolescent players in small-sided basketball games. Front. Psychol. 15:1392667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392668
Kumalasari, D. (2023). Academic resilience among Indonesian college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of future orientation and peer support. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 21, 541–558. doi: 10.25115/ejrep.v21i61.7945
Laird, Y., Fawkner, S., and Niven, A. (2018). A grounded theory of how social support influences physical activity in adolescent girls. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being 13:1435099. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1435099
Lee, C.-W., and Hung, H.-C. (2024). Shaping futures: the impact of family involvement, peer and coach support on the career orientation of indigenous student athletes. Heliyon 10:e38706. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38706
Lou, H., Liu, P., and Jin, S. J. (2014). A qualitative study on influence factors of mental toughness in elite Chinese athletes. China Sport Sci. 34, 48–55. doi: 10.16469/j.css.2014.08.007
Mahoney, J. W., Gucciardi, D. F., Ntoumanis, N., and Mallet, C. J. (2014). Mental toughness in sport: motivational antecedents and associations with performance and psychological health. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 36, 281–292. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0260
Meggs, J., and Chen, M. A. (2018). Mental toughness and attributions of failure in high performing male and female swimmers. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 13, 276–282. doi: 10.14198/jhse.2018.132.03
Meggs, J., and Chen, M. A. (2019). Competitive performance effects of psychological skill training for youth swimmers. Percept. Mot. Skills 126, 886–903. doi: 10.1177/0031512519852533
Meggs, J., Ditzfeld, C., and Golby, J. (2014). Self-concept organisation and mental toughness in sport. J. Sports Sci. 32, 101–109. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.812230
Moran, G. S., Russinova, Z., Gidugu, V., Yim, J. Y., and Sprague, C. (2012). Benefits and mechanisms of recovery among peer providers with psychiatric illnesses. Qual. Health Res. 22, 304–319. doi: 10.1177/1049732311420578
Moreira, C. R., Codonhato, R., and Fiorese, L. (2021). Transcultural adaptation and psychometric proprieties of the mental toughness inventory for Brazilian athletes. Front. Psychol. 12:2607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663382
Nicholls, A. R., Levy, A. R., Polman, R. C. J., and Crust, L. (2011). Mental toughness, coping self-efficacy, and coping effectiveness among athletes. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 42, 513–524.
Nicholls, A. R., Morley, D., and Perry, J. L. (2016). Mentally tough athletes are more aware of unsupportive coaching behaviours: perceptions of coach behaviour, motivational climate, and mental toughness in sport. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 11, 172–181. doi: 10.1177/1747954116636714
Nicholls, A. R., Polman, R., Levy, A. R., and Backhouse, S. H. (2009). Mental toughness in sport: achievement level, gender, age, experience, and sport type differences. Pers. Individ. Differ. 47, 73–75. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.006
Pacewicz, C. E., Mellano, K. T., and Smith, A. L. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social constructs and athlete burnout. Psychol. Sport Exerc, 43, 155–164. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.02.002
Pan, H. W., Huang, W. Y., and Wu, C. E. (2022). Research on the relationships among the gender consciousness, social support, and wellbeing in Taiwan college female athletes. SAGE Open 12, 1–13. doi: 10.1177/21582440221097895
Pan, Y., Lv, M., Shi, Y., and Ji, Y. (2021). The effect of peer support on physical exercise behavior among students at a university in Beijing. China Health Educ. 37, 825–823. doi: 10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2021.09.012
Ramolale, M., Malete, L., and Ju, U. (2021). Mediational role of mental toughness on the relationship between self-efficacy and prosocial/antisocial behavior in elite youth sport. Front. Psychol. 12:745323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.745323
Robinson, M., Raine, G., Robertson, S., Steen, M., and Day, R. (2015). Peer support as a resilience building practice with men. J. Public Ment. Health 14, 196–204. doi: 10.1108/JPMH-04-2015-0015
Rogowska, A. M., Tataruch, R., Niedźwiecki, K., and Wojciechowska-Maszkowska, B. (2022). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between approach motivational system and sports success among elite speed skating athletes and physical education students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:2899. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052899
Sallis, J. F., Grossman, R. M., Pinski, R. B., Patterson, T. L., and Nader, P. R. (1987). The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev. Med. 16, 825–836. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3
Shaffer, D. R. (2005). Developmental psychology: with adolescents. 6th Edn. China Light Industry Press: Beijing, China.
Shi, C., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Wang, Z., Gao, X., Fan, Y., et al. (2025). Effects and mechanisms of social support on the adolescent athletes engagement. Sci. Rep. 15, 7018–7011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92110-9
Tian, S., Chen, S., and Cui, Y. (2022). Belief in a just world and mental toughness in adolescent athletes: the mediating mechanism of meaning in life. Front. Psychol. 13:901497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901497
Vega-Díaz, M., and González-García, H. (2024). Do parenting styles influence mental toughness and sportsmanship in young athletes? A structural equation modelling approach. J. Hum. Kinet. 95, 243–254. doi: 10.5114/jhk/186543
Wang, Z., Wang, J. R., Ma, J., Chen, T. Y., Yang, H. X., Wang, J., et al. (2025). Psychological mechanism of character strengths and psychological stress affecting the athletic performance in swimmers. Sci. Rep. 15:26548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11936-5
Wilson, P. M., and Rodgers, W. M. (2004). The relationship between perceived autonomy support, exercise regulations and behavioral intentions in women. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 5, 229–244. doi: 10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00003-2
Yu, C. F., Zeng, Z. H., Xue, A. C., and Wu, Q. J. (2024). The effect of exercise motivation on college students’ self-efficacy: the mediating roles of leisure satisfaction and mental toughness. Front. Psychol. 15:1465137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1465138
Zalewska, A. M., Krzywosz-Rynkiewicz, B., Clough, P. J., and Dagnall, N. (2019). Mental toughness development through adolescence: effects of age group and community size. Soc. Behav. Pers. 47, 1–8. doi: 10.2224/sbp.7376
Keywords: peer support, mental toughness, self-efficacy, social cognitive theory, adolescent swimmers
Citation: Chen B, Li H and Zhang R (2025) The mechanism of peer support on the mental toughness of adolescent swimmers: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 16:1663002. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1663002
Edited by:
Manuel Gómez-López, University of Murcia, SpainReviewed by:
Alfonso Trinidad Morales, European University of Madrid, SpainWalaa Jumah Alkasasbeh, Middle East University, Jordan
Copyright © 2025 Chen, Li and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Haixia Li, MzgyNTgxMTE0QHFxLmNvbQ==