Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 19 September 2025

Sec. Sport Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1675905

This article is part of the Research TopicMultidisciplinary Aspects and Performance in Racket Sports, volume IIView all 13 articles

Correction: Development and validation of a questionnaire for table tennis teaching in physical education

  • 1ENFYRED Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
  • 2Faculty of Human Sciences and Education, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
  • 3Faculty of Health Sciences, ENFYRED Research Group, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

A Correction on
Development and validation of a questionnaire for table tennis teaching in physical education

by Ortega-Zayas, M. Á., Cardona-Linares, A. J., Quílez, A., García-Giménez, A., Lecina, M., and Pradas, F. (2025). Front. Psychol. 16:1550061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1550061

Supplemental material “Supplementary File 1 - RSAS_Questionnaire_2025.docx” was omitted. The file has now been published.

A correction has been made to the section 2 Materials and methods, 2.3 Instruments, paragraph 5 to include the citation to the supplementary material.

“From this moment on, a first questionnaire called the Racquet Sports Attitude Scale (RSAS) was prepared (Supplementary File 1), where a total of 62 potential questions were formulated, including demographic data, distributed in five categories: (a) difficulties in applying PE content, (b) positive attitude toward RSs, (c) benefits of TT, (d) facilitators for the application of TT; In the phase of preparing the initial questionnaire, the way of asking is specified, deciding on the number of questions, the order and their arrangement. After this preliminary design, a quantitative pilot study of reliability and validity with a sample of 20 professionals from different autonomous communities of Spain (Andalusia, Aragon, Castilla y León, Castilla la Mancha, Catalonia, Valencian Community and Madrid) was carried out. This initial sample enabled the first checks on the reliability indices of the items, dimensions, and consistency of the questionnaire, resulting in Alpha indices ranging from 0.66 to 0.88. All this allowed three studies to be carried out (the first two converging into one) on a final sample of 196 PE professionals.”

The original version of this article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: racket sports, questionnaire, physical education, teacher skills, educational content

Citation: Ortega-Zayas MÁ, Cardona-Linares AJ, Quílez A, García-Giménez A, Lecina M and Pradas F (2025) Correction: Development and validation of a questionnaire for table tennis teaching in physical education. Front. Psychol. 16:1675905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1675905

Received: 29 July 2025; Accepted: 09 September 2025;
Published: 19 September 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: Jesus Ramón-Llin, University of Valencia, Spain

Copyright © 2025 Ortega-Zayas, Cardona-Linares, Quílez, García-Giménez, Lecina and Pradas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Miguel Lecina, bWxlY2luYUB1bml6YXIuZXM=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.