Abstract
AAI, the major alpha-amylase inhibitor (AAI) present in the seeds of the Mexican crop plant Amaranthus hypocondriacus is a 32-residue-long polypeptide with three disulfide bridges. Its structure is most closely related to the plant amylase inhibitor subfamily of knottins characterized by a topological knot formed by one disulfide bridge threading through a loop formed by the peptide chain as well as a short three-stranded beta sandwich core. AAI is specific against insect amylases and does not act on corresponding human or mammalian enzymes. It was found that the oxidative folding of AAI seems to follow a hirudine-like pathway with many non-native intermediates, but notably it proceeds through a major folding intermediate (MFI) that contains a vicinal disulfide bridge. Based on a review of the pertinent literature, the known vicinal disulfides in native proteins as well as well as the network of disulfide interchanges, we propose that MFI is a kinetic trap corresponding to a compact molten globule-like state which constrains the peptide chain to a smaller number of conformations that in turn can be rapidly funneled toward the native state.
AAI: The Major Alpha Amylase Inhibitor of Amaranthus hypochondriacus
AAI (amaranth amylase inhibitor) is an alpha-amylase inhibitor isolated from the Mexican crop plant Amaranthus hypochondriacus. Amaranth grains are known to be cultivated for about 8,000 years and were part of the diet of the Aztecs. Today, Amaranth is grown in Mexico, Peru, and Bolivia, but the world's largest producer is China with an estimated annual production of 87 million metric tons. Amaranths are classified as pseudo cereals as they are not in the same botanical family as true cereals to which their grains bear similarity.
Aqueous extracts of Amaranth grains were found to inhibit insect alpha-amylases extracted from the larvae of the red flour beetle (Dibolium castaneum) and of the grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus). The alpha-amylase was purified with classical techniques (Chagolla-Lopez et al., ). Briefly, crude extracts of amaranth flour were fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitation (35–65%), fractionated on G75 Sepharose columns and the lyophilized active fractions were subjected to ion exchange chromatography The majority of inhibitory activity was found in one major peak which was further purified with reverse phase HPLC (RP-HPLC). The inhibitory activity was resistant to heat. As amino acid analysis revealed a high percentage of cysteine with no free sulfhydryl groups, the samples were reduced and pyridylethylated prior to sequencing. Digestion with trypsin and cyanogen bromide resulted in 7 overlapping peptides sequenced by automated Edman degradation which gave an assembled sequence of 32 amino acids with 6 cysteines and four prolines. The disulfide bridges were determined from partial double digests of the non-reduced peptide obtained with trypsin/chymotripsin. The disulfide topology could be determined except for the uncertainty caused by the vicinal cysteines 18 and 19, but a consensus topology could be predicted based on the multiple alignment (Figure 1) which was subsequently confirmed with both NMR (Lu et al., ) and X-ray crystallography (Pereira et al., ).
Figure 1
As shown by the NMR structure in Figure 2, AAI contains 3 disulfide bridges in the abcabc topology, bridge a connecting Cys1 and Cys18, bridge b connecting Cys8 and Cys23, and bridge c connecting Cys17 and Cys31, respectively. With its length of only 32 residues, AAI was the shortest alpha-amylase inhibitor known at the time of its discovery, about 10 years later related amylase inhibitors of 30 amino acids were discovered (Tam et al.,
Figure 2

NMR structure of AAI. The NMR structure is deposited in the PDB under the id 1QFD (Lu et al.,
The 3D Structure of AAI
The 3D structure of AAI was first predicted with molecular modeling based on homology to other peptides (Chagolla-Lopez et al.,
The X-ray structure of AAI, in complex with the α-amylase of yellow meal worm (Tenebrio molitor) larvae (TMA) was determined at 2.0 Å resolution (Pereira et al.,
Figure 3

X-ray structure of AAI in complex with the Tenebrio molitor alpha-amylase enzyme. Figure prepared from PDB entry 1CLV (Pereira et al.,
Synthesis and in vitro Oxidative Folding of AAI
The AAI peptide was synthesized manually on a 1-mmol scale by solid-phase peptide synthesis using an Fmoc (N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) methodology (Lozanov et al.,
The oxidative folding of AAI was studied with a variety of techniques [acid quenching followed by RP-HPLC and mass spectrometry, NMR, photoCIDNP [photochemically induced dynamic nuclear polarization], CD [circular dichroism]] (Cemazar et al.,
Figure 4

The oxidative folding intermediates of AAI. Oxidative folding was carried out at pH 8.5, 25°C, by placing 100 mg_liter−1 AAI into the refolding buffer (100 mM ammonium acetate/1 M guanidinium hydrochloride/1 mM cysteine/0.05 mM cystine/2 mM EDTA). The same distribution of intermediates was observed when the folding was carried out at different pH values (7.0, 7.5, 8.0, and 8.5) and in the absence of guanidinium hydrochloride. The disulfide connectivity of the intermediates was determined by acid trapping and mass spectrometry as described in the text. The disulfide pairings of intermediates I1 and I4 could not be unequivocally determined due to the vicinal cysteines.
Figure 5

Time course of the oxidative folding of AAI. The abundance of reduced and native forms, as well as the MFI are shown as a function of time during folding. The accumulation of the MFI and then its gradual conversion to the native form is clearly visible. Inset: reductive unfolding of AAI carried out with dithio-treitol (DTT) shows an all-or-none mechanism i.e., no intermediates are shown in addition to the native and the completely reduced species. The reduction was carried out in a buffer similar to that described in the legend to Figure 4 except that it contained 1–10 mM of DTT instead of cysteine/cystine (original figure based on published data).
The dominance of MFI was observed both for the enzyme catalyzed and for the cysteine/cystine catalyzed reaction, the only difference was that in the enzyme catalyzed reaction intermediate I1 was the most intensive for the first minutes of the folding process (data not shown). The disulfide connectivity of MFI is “bead-like” i.e., Cys residues pair with their sequential neighbors. This is in good accordance with the general view that local interactions dominate the first stages of protein folding. In order to get insights into the role the intermediates we prepared a folding map with intermediates as the nodes and disulfide exchange reactions as the edges (Agoston et al.,
Figure 6

Example of a thiolate-catalyzed intramolecular rearrangement between two disulfide bridges. In this example intermediate I6 is transformed into the native structure. XS− the thiolate form of the redox assistant Cys molecule the blue arrow indicates a nucleophilic attack. Note that in this example the thiolate attacks bridge 3–4 first, but the native structure can be reached also if the thiolate first attacks bridge 1–6.
Figure 7

Oxidative folding map built from the disulfide intermediates observed oxidative folding of AAI. Each node is an intermediate, folding map of the observed disulfide intermediates shown in Figure 4. The nodes are the observed intermediates, numbers indicate the serial order of cysteine residues within the sequence, i.e., 1 = Cys1, 2 = Cys8, 3 = Cys17, 6 = Cys30. The edges are intramolecular folding reactions (reshuffling reactions), an example for them is shown in Figure 6.
NMR and photoCIDNP experiments revealed that the reduced form R is close to random coil, but MFI has some structure (or rather a set of slowly interconverting structures) that differs from that of the native AAI especially in terms of the accessibility of aromatic side chains that is revealed by photoCIDNP. Time resolved NMR revealed a monotonous change in the aliphatic and aromatic NMR signals, respectively, and confirmed that enzyme catalyzed reaction was somewhat faster, even though it proceeded through the same intermediates, with minor quantitative differences at the first stages of the reaction (Carugo et al.,
The Role of the Vicinal Disulfide Bridge
Chemical intuition suggests that a vicinal S-S bond (and the associated eight-member ring) could have structural effects similar to a proline residue (a five-member ring) in constraining the movement of the main chain in such a way that a turn is formed (Carugo et al.,
Figure 8

Ramachandran-like representation of vicinal disulfide bridges in current 3DB databases. Data from the Cys.sqlite database (Fobe et al.,
Figure 9

Examples of turn-like conformations induced by vicinal disulfide bridges. Examples for the cis and trans clusters are shown with CATH domain codes. Six residue fragments re shown with positions 3 and 4 corresponding to the disulfide-forming vicinal cysteines. Structural representations were prepared with Chimera (Pettersen et al.,
Summary and Conclusions
Oxidative folding can be best pictured as the fusion of two competing processes, the formation of covalent disulfide bridges on the one hand, and the formation the non-covalent interactions on the other hand, that are known to give rise to secondary and tertiary structure. It is believed that there are two extreme pathway types of oxidative folding (Narayan et al.,
To our knowledge, the biotechnological potential of AAI-like proteins is yet a largely unexplored area. Although there are a number of disupfide-rich peptides that are extensively used in protein design as scaffolds (Wang and Craik,
Statements
Author contributions
JJ, ZG, and SP designed the review and drafted the manuscript.
Funding
This project was supported in part by the Hungarian government grants OTKA 120650 (Microbiome bioinformatics: Computational analysis of complex bacterial communities) EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00013 (4. Integration of high-throughput biological data), EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00002 (2. Non-conventional computing and modeling approaches) which were supported by the European Union and co-financed by the European Social Fund as well as by grant ED_17-1-2017-0009 of the National Bionics Program sponsored by Hungarian Ministry of Technology and Innovation.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank for the help and advice of Drs. András Patthy, Sotir Zahariev, Corrado Gurnaccia, Maša Čemažar, Stefan Strobl, Profs. Peter J. Hore, Robert Huber, and the late Prof. X. Gu. The comments of Dr. E. Welker on the manuscript are gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AgostonV.CemazarM.KajánL.PongorS. (2005). Graph-representation of oxidative folding pathways. BMC Bioinform.6:19. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-19
2
CammueB. P.De BolleM. F.TerrasF. R.ProostP.Van DammeJ.ReesS. B.et al. (1992). Isolation and characterization of a novel class of plant antimicrobial peptides form mirabilis Jalapa L. Seeds. J. Biol. Chem.267, 2228–2233.
3
CarugoO.CemazarM.ZaharievS.HudákyI.GáspáriZ.PerczelA.et al. (2003). Vicinal disulfide turns. Protein. Eng.16, 637–639. 10.1093/protein/gzg088
4
CemazarM.GruberC. W.CraikD. J. (2008). Oxidative folding of cyclic cystine knot proteins. Antioxid. Redox Signal.10, 103–111. 10.1089/ars.2007.1849
5
CemazarM.ZaharievS.LopezJ. J.CarugoO.JonesJ. A.HoreP. J.et al. (2003). Oxidative folding intermediates with nonnative disulfide bridges between adjacent cysteine residues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.100, 5754–5759. 10.1073/pnas.2225470100
6
CemazarM.ZaharievS.PongorS.HoreP. J. (2004). Oxidative folding of amaranthus α-amylase inhibitor: disulfide bond formation and conformational folding. J. Biol. Chem.279, 16697–16705. 10.1074/jbc.M312328200
7
Chagolla-LopezA.Blanco-LabraA.PatthyA.SánchezR.PongorS. (1994). A novel α-amylase inhibitor from amaranth (Amaranthus hypocondriacus) seeds. J. Biol. Chem.269, 23675–23680.
8
ChangJ-Y. (2011). Diverse pathways of oxidative folding of disulfide proteins, underlying causes and folding models. Biochemistry50, 3414–3431. 10.1021/bi200131j
9
DawsonN. L.LewisT. E.DasS.LeesJ. G.LeeD.AshfordP.et al. (2017). CATH: an expanded resource to predict protein function through structure and sequence. Nucleic Acids Res.45, D289–D295. 10.1093/nar/gkw1098
10
FobeT. L.KazakovA.RiccardiD. (2019). Cys.sqlite: a structured-information approach to the comprehensive analysis of cysteine disulfide bonds in the protein databank. J. Chem. Inf. Model.59, 931–943. 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00950
11
GaoG. H.LiuW.DaiJ. X.WangJ. F.HuZ.ZhangY.et al. (2001). Solution structure of PAFP-S: a New Knottin-type antifungal peptide from the seeds of phytolacca americana. Biochemistry40, 10973–10978. 10.1021/bi010167k
12
HudákyI.GáspáriZ.CarugoO.CemažarM.PongorS.PerczelA. (2004). Vicinal disulfide bridge conformers by experimental methods and by ab initio and DFT molecular computations. Proteins Struct. Func. Gene55, 152–168. 10.1002/prot.10581
13
Le NguyenD.HeitzA.ChicheL.CastroB.BoigegrainR. A.FavelA.et al. (1990). Molecular recognition between serine proteases and new bioactive microproteins with a knotted structure. Biochimie72, 431–435. 10.1016/0300-9084(90)90067-Q
14
LozanovV.GuarnacciaC.PatthyA.FotiS.PongorS. (1997). Synthesis and cystine/cysteine-catalyzed oxidative folding of the amaranth α-amylase inhibitor. J. Pept. Res.50, 65–72. 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1997.tb00621.x
15
LuS.DengP.LiuX.LuoJ.HanR.GuX.et al. (1999). Solution structure of the major α-amylase inhibitor of the crop plant amaranth. J. Biol. Chem.274, 20473–20478. 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20473
16
NarayanM.WelkerE.WedemeyerW. J.ScheragaH. A. (2000). Oxidative folding of proteins. Acc. Chem. Res.33, 805–812. 10.1021/ar000063m
17
NguyenP. Q, Luu, T. T.BaiY.NguyenG. K.PervushinK.TamJ. P. (2015). Allotides: proline-rich cystine knot α-amylase inhibitors from allamanda cathartica. J. Nat. Prod.78, 695–704. 10.1021/np500866c
18
NguyenP. Q.WangS.KumarA.YapL. J.LuuT. T.LescarJ. (2014). Discovery and characterization of pseudocyclic cystine-knot α-amylase inhibitors with high resistance to heat and proteolytic degradation. FEBS J.281, 4351–4366. 10.1111/febs.12939
19
PereiraP. J.LozanovV.PatthyA.HuberR.BodeW.PongorS.et al. (1999). Specific inhibition of insect α-amylases: yellow meal worm α-amylase in complex with the amaranth α-amylase inhibitor at 2.0 å resolution. Structure7, 1079–1088. 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80175-0
20
PettersenE. F.GoddardT. D.HuangC. C.CouchG. S.GreenblattD. M.MengE. C.et al. (2004). UCSF chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem.25, 1605–1612. 10.1002/jcc.20084
21
PosticG.GracyJ.PérinC.ChicheL.GellyJ. C. (2018). KNOTTIN: the database of inhibitor cystine knot scaffold after 10 years, toward a systematic structure modeling. Nucleic Acids Res.46, D454–D458. 10.1093/nar/gkx1084
22
ReinwarthM.GlotzbachB.TomaszowskiM.FabritzS.AvrutinaO.KolmarH. (2013). Oxidative folding of peptides with cystine-knot architectures: kinetic studies and optimization of folding conditions. ChemBioChem14, 137–146. 10.1002/cbic.201200604
23
RichardsonJ. S, Videau, L. L.WilliamsC. J.RichardsonD. C. (2017). Broad analysis of vicinal disulfides: occurrences, conformations with cis or with trans peptides, and functional roles including sugar binding. J. Mol. Biol.429, 1321–1335. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.03.017
24
TamJ. P, Wang, S.WongK. H.TanW. L. (2015). Antimicrobial peptides from plants. Pharmaceuticals8, 711–757. 10.3390/ph8040711
25
WangC. K.CraikD. J. (2018). Designing macrocyclic disulfide-rich peptides for biotechnological applications. Nat. Chem. Biol.14, 417–427. 10.1038/s41589-018-0039-y
26
ZhengY.LiZ.RenJ.LiuW.WuY.ZhaoY.et al. (2017). Artificial disulfide-rich peptide scaffolds with precisely defined disulfide patterns and a minimized number of isomers. Chem. Sci.8, 2547–2552. 10.1039/C6SC05710A
Summary
Keywords
AAI, Amaranth alpha-amylase inhibitor, Amaranthus hypocondriacus, oxidative folding, folding intermediate, vicinal disulfide
Citation
Juhász J, Gáspári Z and Pongor S (2020) Structure and Oxidative Folding of AAI, the Major Alfa-Amylase Inhibitor From Amaranth Seeds. Front. Chem. 8:180. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00180
Received
19 December 2019
Accepted
26 February 2020
Published
17 March 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Diana Imhof, University of Bonn, Germany
Reviewed by
Octavio Luiz Franco, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brazil; Yuji Nishiuchi, GlyTech, Inc., Japan
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Juhász, Gáspári and Pongor.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zoltán Gáspári gaspari.zoltan@itk.ppke.huSándor Pongor pongor@itk.ppke.hu
This article was submitted to Chemical Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.