Abstract
Binding of noble gases (NGs) is commonly considered to be the realm of highly reactive electophiles with cationic or at least non-charged character. Herein, we summarize our latest results evidencing that the incorporation of a strongly electrophilic site within a rigid cage-like anionic structure offers several advantages that facilitate the binding of noble gases and stabilize the formed NG adducts. The anionic superelectrophiles investigated by us are based on the closo-dodecaborate dianion scaffold. The record holder [B12(CN)11]− binds spontaneously almost all members of the NG family, including the very inert argon at room temperature and neon at 50 K in the gas phase of mass spectrometers. In this perspective, we summarize the argumentation for the advantages of anionic electrophiles in binding of noble gases and explain them in detail using several examples. Then we discuss the next steps necessary to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the binding properties of electrophilic anions with NGs. Finally, we discuss the perspective to prepare bulk ionic materials containing NG derivatives of the anionic superelectophiles. In particular, we explore the role of counterions using computational methods and discuss the methodology, which may be used for the actual preparation of such salts.
Introduction
The spontaneous binding of a noble gas (NG) at room temperature remains the privilege of the strongest electrophiles (Brock et al., ; Pan et al., 2019). Due to the closed electron shell of NGs, their electron affinities are negative and a NG atom cannot be chemically attacked by any type of nucleophile. Therefore, the only possibility to form a bond is to abstract electron density from the NG. A number of NG adducts with electrophiles have been characterized in cryogenic matrices (Khriachtchev et al., ; Wang and Wang, 2013; Wang X. et al., 2013) where even very weak bonds can hold these compounds together. Under these reaction conditions, it was even possible to observe the first neutral argon compound (Khriachtchev et al., ; Bochenkova et al., ). In contrast, room temperature NG chemistry is mainly limited to the heavier NGs, mainly xenon (Malm et al., ; Haner and Schrobilgen, ) and, on a much more limited basis, krypton (Lehmann et al., ). The majority of NG compounds contains fluorine or oxygen (Liebman and Deakyne, ; Samanta, 2014) since these elements have very high electronegativities and are strongly electron withdrawing. Also, compounds with vacant boron and beryllium atoms were often proposed as suitable NG binders due to their exceptional electron deficiency (Pan et al., 2014; Saha et al., 2016, 2019). It is also well understandable that strong NG bonds have been frequently reported for highly reactive isolated cations (Grandinetti, ), which satisfy their demand for electrons with almost everything that comes into reach—even a NG. However, other molecules or atoms, which are more nucleophilic, tend to substitute the NG and bind the electrophilic cations. Using cationic NG derivatives for the generation of a condensed phase compound is therefore hindered by a fundamental problem: a cation needs to be paired with a counteranion. Anions are typically much stronger nucleophiles than the NG itself and, therefore, immediately substitute the NG by forming a bond with the electrophilic binding site. Experimental access to most reported molecular NG cations, which are stable at room temperature, remains limited to the low-pressure gas phase of a mass spectrometer.
Recently, we discovered that the electrophilic anion [B12Cl11]− is able to bind spontaneously xenon and krypton at room temperature in the gas phase (Rohdenburg et al., 2017). Later, aiming at further increase of reactivity, we prepared and investigated the cyanated derivative [B12(CN)11]−, which was found to be much more electrophilic than its predecessor. It is able to bind argon at room temperature (Mayer et al., ) and can even form a stable adduct with extremely unreactive neon (Mayer et al., ) at temperatures up to 50 K. High level computational studies and investigations of the weak complexes in the cold matrix have shown that the binding energies for Ne are often even smaller than for He in similar adducts and, therefore, Ne was discussed to be the most inert NG (Frenking et al., ; Grandinetti, ; Grochala, ). These electrophilic anions are generated by collision induced dissociation (CID) of their gaseous precursors closo-dodecaborate dianions [B12X12]2− (X=halogen, CN), which constitute a class of very stable and inert weakly coordinating anions (WCAs) (Knapp, ). The discussed experimental results inspired further theoretical investigations on the NG binding properties of similar compounds, even with higher negative charge (Joshi and Ghanty, , ).
In the first section of this perspective, we summarize and explain the binding concepts of electrophilic anions with NGs and their advantages when compared with “common” cationic electrophiles. Then, we discuss open questions that still need to be clarified to obtain a comprehensive and quantitative understanding of the binding between electrophilic anions and NGs. Finally, we deepen the insights on the effect of counterions on the NG bond with electrophilic anions and discuss the possibilities and limitations for the preparation of salts using [B12X11NG]− anions as precursors.
Results and Discussion
Remark: If not stated otherwise, calculations were performed using the B3LYP DFT functional and, in most cases, results have not been confirmed using high-level correlated methods. Reported numbers are given for the purpose of qualitative comparison of reactions and should not be interpreted as quantitative thermochemistry values. More details can be found in the methods section and in the Supplementary Material.
Fundamental Concepts of Electrophilic Anions and Their Reactivity
Several fundamental concepts underline the formation and binding traits of electrophilic anions. We will discuss them below on the example of closo-dodecaborate dianions [B12X12]2−, which have been the objects of our detailed investigations. However, related molecular systems, for example so called anionic “super atomic clusters” (Jena and Sun, ) or other closo-borate anions may show similar features (Rohdenburg et al., 2020).
(i) Breaking the Most Stable Generates the Most Reactive
An exceptionally reactive electrophilic site within an ion is required to bind a NG atom. In our search for very reactive molecular ions we were following a simple idea: breaking bonds in very stable molecular ions should result in the most reactive fragments. A large driving force should be present in the fragment to recover the original highly stable structural and electronic configuration of the precursor. The closo-dodecaborate dianions [B12X12]2− (Figure 1A) possess very high icosahedral (Ih) molecular symmetry, a 3D-aromatic σ-electron system and exceptional electronic stability (Warneke et al., 2017). As first predicted theoretically (Zhao et al., 2016) and later confirmed experimentally (Mayer et al., ), the [B12(CN)12]2− dianion has the highest second electron binding energy (the energy necessary to detach an electron from the doubly charged anion) known for small multiply charged anions synthesized so far (>5 eV). The [B12Cl12]2− dianion has been used to stabilize extremely reactive countercations in the condensed phase, including methyl (Bolli et al., ) and silyl (Kessler et al., ) cations, thus evidencing its exceptional chemical inertness. These facts demonstrate the outstanding electronic, structural, and chemical stability of closo-dodecaborate dianions and make them ideal precursors for the generation of highly reactive fragments by breaking a B-X bond.
Figure 1
(ii) Positive, Strong Electrophilic Site Within an Anion
Since only strong electrophiles, but not nucleophiles, are able to bind a NG by forming a bond with significant covalent character, anions have raised limited attention as potential strong NG binders. However, the fragment [B12X11]− possess a special charge distribution: although the ion is overall negatively charged, the vacant boron atom exhibits a strong positive partial charge (Figure 1B), very electrophilic in nature and, therefore, can bind a NG atom. Experimentally, the positive site was probed by infrared photodissociation spectroscopy [for details on the used instrument and method, see Heine and Asmis (
(iii) Preserving the Reactive Site Within a Large Molecular Framework
Large ion sizes are an advantage for the observation of weakly bound adducts in the gas phase. Upon collision of the ion with a NG, a “hot collision complex” is formed. If the collisional energy can be efficiently redistributed into many vibrational degrees of freedom, the complex can survive until further collisions with background gases cool the adduct. Collision complexes of smaller ions have much less chances to survive long enough for experimental observation, even if the NG bond may have a similar strength. However, most highly reactive isolated cations which exhibit NG binding at room temperature are small (<10 atoms). Often, a highly reactive positively charged site embedded into a large molecular framework results in structural rearrangement of the molecular ion. For example, electrophilicity of the phenyl cation can be increased by the substitution of all five hydrogens by fluorine, raising its binding energy with Xe theoretically from around 70 to 150 kJ/mol. However, it has been experimentally and theoretically shown that, unlike the phenyl cation [C6H5]+, the pentafluorinated phenyl cation [C6F5]+ is unstable in the gas phase and spontaneously fragments by expulsion of difluorocarbene. This rearrangement results in a more stable cationic species containing an aromatic cyclopropenium moiety (Wang H.-Y. et al., 2013), which has only a small Xe binding enthalpy of around 15 kJ/mol. Though pentafluorinated phenyl cations cannot be generated in a gas phase reaction, the preparation of its xenon derivative, the [C6F5Xe]+ cation, was possible in a reaction between XeF2 and B(C6F5), proceeding via a concerted substitution mechanism, at low temperature in an inert organic solvent, such as CH2Cl2 or MeCN (Frohn and Jakobs,
(iv) Preference for Binding of Non-polar Nucleophiles
A cationic binding site within an anion results in a special distribution of the electric field near this site. Reaction partners located far away from the ions are only affected by the anionic negative charge, while close to the positive binding site, the electric field changes its direction. Polar molecules such as water, which are usually stronger nucleophiles than NGs, change their preferred orientation upon approach to the binding site (Figure 1C). This situation may result in substantial centrifugal barriers. In contrast, a NG atom can just repolarize and may have an advantage in the competition with polar nucleophiles for the binding site. Thus, such electrophilic anions should show relative selectivity in binding to non-polar nucleophilic species.
(v) Large Interaction Surface Between Ion and NG
The binding site of an electrophilic anion [B12X11]− is located within a “crater” of five substituents X. Therefore, beside the dative bond formed by the shift of electron density from the NG to the electrophilic boron, a large surface for additional electrostatic forces and dispersion interactions between the anion and a NG atom strengthens the total interaction (Figure 1D). Upon formation of the dative bond with [B12X11]−, the NG atom becomes partially positively charged, which affords additional attractive electrostatic interaction with the negatively charged [B12X11]− residue. Dispersion interactions (Wagner and Schreiner, 2015) are in particular strong for the heavier and more polarizable NGs, but they also make a significant contribution in the case of Ar and Ne binding (Mayer et al.,
(vi) Protection of the Adducts Against Substitution
The cage structure of the borate anion protects the B-Ng bond against a typical back-side nucleophilic attack following the SN2 mechanism. Therefore, only a side attack of the B-NG bond by a nucleophile is possible. A significant elongation of the B-NG bond is required before such a nucleophile will be able to interact with the vacant boron atom. Therefore, we expect the energy of the transition state (TS) for substitution to be strongly correlated with the B-NG dissociation enthalpy (DE). As an example, we have computationally investigated the substitution of Xe in [B12(CN)11Xe]− by the stronger nucleophile N2. Xe is bound to [B12(CN)11]− with a 0 K DE of 114 kJ/mol. We started with a {[B12(CN)11Xe]−···N2} complex, in which N2 is only weakly bound to the ion (Figure 1E). Then, we simulated the attack by systematically reducing the B-N distance. The optimized TS was found to be 90 kJ/mol higher in enthalpy than the initial minimum with a B-Xe bond significantly elongated by 1.3 Å. The product of the favorable substitution was found at ΔH0K = −52 kJ/mol. For direct comparison, we choose the adduct between Xe and , which binds Xe even stronger (see details in Supplementary Material, section Substitution of Xe by N2 in [H3CXe]+). Although the substitution of Xe in [H3CXe]+ with N2 is less exothermic (ΔH0K = −20 kJ/mol), the TS was calculated to be considerably lower in enthalpy with ΔH0K = 17 kJ/mol and a C-Xe bond length elongation by 0.5 Å was found. This demonstrates that the TS for substitution reactions in [B12(CN)11NG]− is comparatively high. We note that the same argumentation qualitatively holds when repeating the calculations on the BMK-GD3BJ/aug-cc-pVTZ (SDD) level of theory (see details in Supplementary Material, section Substitution of Xe by N2 on BMK-GD3BJ/aug-cc-pVTZ (SDD) Level of Theory). It has been reported that the BMK functional yields better quantitative thermochemistry values for NG compounds compared to our standard approach relying on the dispersion-corrected B3LYP DFT functional (Grandinetti,
(vii) Stabilization of Adducts With Counterions
There exists an intrinsic thermodynamic problem for highly reactive cations to form stable NG adducts in the condensed phase, since they demand the presence of counterions. These counterions are anions that have commonly nucleophilic nature. Usually, anionic counterions will be by far stronger competitors for the positive electrophilic binding site of a reactive cation than NGs and a substitution of the NG by the anion's nucleophilic site will be energetically preferred. The existence of a salt consisting of a NG binding cation and a counteranion is only possible if strong kinetic barriers hinder this substitution reaction. In contrast, [B12X11NG]− requires a countercation. Simple counterions like alkali cations do not show any tendency to bind to the electrophilic boron site. Instead, the most preferred position of a cation is the backside of the [B12X11NG]− ion, which constitutes its most negative region (Figure 1F). In order to demonstrate this concept on an example, we compare the [B5O7Xe]+ cation (Jin et al.,
Figure 2

Effect of ion pairing on the 0 K dissociation enthalpy (DE) of Xe (A) Combinations of the WCA [HCB11Cl11]- with [B5O7Xe]+. (B) Combination of Li+ with [B12(CN)11Xe]−. (C) Combination of [B5O7]+ with [B12(CN)11Xe]−: a rearrangement is thermochemically preferred and results in the loss of the vacant boron site which binds the NG.
The stabilization of the B-NG bond upon ion pairing with a cation is based on the electron withdrawing effect of a cation. Therefore, it may be suggested that an even more electrophilic cation should have a stronger stabilizing effect on the B-NG bond. In our computational investigations, we studied the [B5O7]+ ion as a counterion for [B12(CN)11Xe]−. The exceptionally positive boron atom (NPA charge +1.5 e) should have an even stronger electron withdrawing effect. However, in contrast to Li+, [B5O7]+ interacts only with one CN substituent at the backside of [B12(CN)11Xe]− and the stabilizing effect for the B-Xe bond is in both cases comparable (Figures 2B,C). Also, binding of [B5O7]+ to the backside of [B12(CN)11Xe]− is not the global minimum of this ion pair. It is much more favorable to bind the vacant boron atom of the anion [B12CN11]− to an oxygen of [B5O7]+ while the vacant boron atom of the cation binds to a nitrogen atom of a CN substituent of the anion, (Figure 2C). This releases the Xe atom and demonstrates a potential problem for the use of molecular cations with nucleophilic binding sites. This problem is avoided when atomic cations like Li+ and Na+ are used.
To sum up, the unique combination of multiple factors discussed above render halogenated/cyanated closo-dodecaborate fragment ions [B12X11]− special properties that allow them to selectively bind NGs and other weakly nucleophilic substances and additionally stabilize these adducts kinetically. In principle, applicability of these concepts can be extended to other compounds with similar structural and electronic properties, such as diverse anionic cage borates or metal clusters. However, synthetic accessibility, high chemical stability, and exceptionally high reactivity of the vacant boron site make [B12X11]− fragment ions the most promising superelectrophilic anions for our further studies.
Next Steps Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of NG Binding by Electrophilic Anions
Several parameters influence the properties of the reactive site and therefore the bond between an electrophilic anion and a NG atom. The positive partial charge of the vacant boron atom in [B12X11]− (concept ii) appears to be of critical importance. We expect a correlation between the reactivity of [B12X11]− and the electronic stability of the dianionic precursor [B12X12]2−: the more stable the dianion, the more electrophilic its monoanionic fragment [B12X11]− should become. This assumption is supported by the so far limited data on different electrophilic anions that is available. However, the energetics of NG binding is not solely affected by the vacant positive boron atom, but also by the interactions of NG with the five substituents X surrounding the binding site. Their partial charge, steric demand, and polarizability (critical for dispersion forces) are expected to have a significant influence on the NG binding. We aim for a better understanding how strongly these interactions influence the NG binding in electrophilic anions. A comparative experimental and theoretical study probing the binding of different electrophilic anions [B12X11]− (X = F, Cl, Br, I, CN) toward different NGs (Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe) is currently in progress and the results are expected to be published soon.
A quantitative understanding of the kinetic parameters influencing NG binding may be even more challenging. Water is a competing and much stronger nucleophile, which is usually present in significant amounts in the background of mass spectrometers at room temperature. Highly reactive cations (e.g., the phenyl cation), which are calculated to form bonds to NGs with enthalpies similar to [B12X11]−, did not bind the NGs under the same experimental conditions at room temperature. Instead, only the water adduct of the phenyl cation was detected (Rohdenburg et al., 2017). The better redistribution of collisional energy (see concept iii), a reduced cross section for a reactive collision of the polar water with [B12X11]− (concept iv) or a better protection of the B-Ng bond against substitution with water (concept vi) may all contribute to the relative stabilization of [B12X11NG]− in comparison with [C6H5NG]+. An evaluation, which of these points is most important is currently difficult for us. In particular, an estimation of the centrifugal barrier for binding of polar molecules with a cationic site within an anion cannot be performed using common models for ion–molecule collision theory. Complex, much more sophisticated models, which take the special electric field and steric demand of the substituents X into account, will be required.
The observation of a strong NG bond in the gas phase always leads to the question if this bond may hold together the same compound or ion in a condensed phase. The thermodynamic stabilization of the B-NG bond in [B12X11NG]− by addition of a countercation (vii) underlines one of the most important features, which distinguishes electrophilic anions from NG-binding cations: a thermodynamically stable, neutral ion pair can be formed. This is certainly very promising for the attempt of generating condensed phase material. However, additional challenges arise in this case, which have not been discussed in our previous publications. The goal of the last section of this perspective is to discuss further challenges on the molecular level, which may arise from building condensed phase materials from [B12X11NG]− adducts and to suggest feasible approaches to overcome these challenges.
On the Way to Bulk Salts of the Anionic NG Derivatives
Experimentally, we consider electrospray-coupled high ion-current deposition methods, so called ion soft landing (Franchetti et al.,
In a condensed material, the [B12(CN)11Xe]− ion will not only be paired with one counterion like Li+, but will be closely surrounded by multiple {[B12(CN)11Xe]−Li+} units. Thus, negatively charged CN substituents of a neighboring anion will be located in spatial proximity to the electrophilic site of [B12X11NG]−. When considering two gaseous [B12(CN)11Xe]− ions in a mass spectrometer, substitution of Xe by formation of a B-NC bond is thermochemically favored by −86 kJ/mol. In the gas phase, this reaction has never been observed because a large Coulomb barrier kinetically hinders two [B12X11NG]− anions from approaching each other. In the bulk of a salt with closely spaced {[B12X11NG]−Li+} ion pairs, the long-range repulsive separation force between two [B12X11NG]− anions can be almost neglected due to the presence of charge compensating Li+ cations. We used a simplified model consisting of two {[B12(CN)11Xe]−Li+} units to estimate the TS and energetics of the Xe-substitution by a CN substituent of two neighboring anions (Figure 3). The calculated TS is located +45 kJ/mol above the minimum in which both Xe are bound by the electrophilic boron sites. The total reaction enthalpy is exothermic by −237 kJ/mol. Therefore, we can conclude that there will be always a thermochemical driving force for the elimination of an NG in a bulk solid upon its substitution with one of the substituents of the neighboring anion. Small alkali cations allow very close contact of neighboring anions in a solid. Additionally, alkali cations like Li+ and Na+ readily form complexes with water (alkali hydrates) and may, therefore, bind background water molecules, which could then attack [B12X11NG]− adducts. Therefore, we conclude that alkali cations may be not the ideal choice to form a stable compound in the condensed phase.
Figure 3

Illustration of the Xe substitution by a CN substituent of a neighboring anion within a Li[B12(CN)11Xe] dimer. (A) Starting geometry (true minimum), (B) transition state, (C) Product of final substitution. Extracts of the molecular structure of the dimer are shown to ensure better visibility of the reactive region. For atom assignment, please see Figure 2.
Thus, the only possibility to isolate the desired NG-containing salt is the “installation” of strong kinetic barriers that should hinder the substitution of the NG, at least at sufficiently low temperatures. We consider that bulky, inert and non-hydrophilic cations should be much better suited than alkali cations since they may push the individual anions further apart from each other, which should affect substantial kinetic barriers for direct reactions between [B12X11NG]− ions in the condensed phase.
The above considerations raise the question how large these barriers have to be and how effectively they can stabilize a B-NG bond. We consider the answer to this question in our case neither general nor straightforward. The well-characterized [F5C6Xe]+ salt (Frohn et al.,
It has been shown that different types of WCAs are optimally suited for the stabilization of [F5C6Xe]+ cation (Frohn and Bardin,
A simple model based on two anions and two cations (see the optimized geometry in Figure 4) indeed demonstrates that [B12(CN)11Xe]− anions are spatially better separated from each other than in the case of (Li[B12(CN)11Xe]−)2. The distance between the anions increases by roughly 1 Å in the optimized geometry of Figure 4 compared to Figure 3A. We expect that this “anion distancing” substantially increases the barrier for their intermolecular reaction with NG elimination. In addition, the outer surface of the cations represents rather chemically inert methyl groups, which have very low nucleophilicity. We calculated a barrier of 131 kJ/mol for the nucleophilic substitution of the Xe by the methyl group (see section Supplementary Material, section Substitution of Xe via Insertion of [B12CN11]− into a C-H Bond of Co). The cyclopentadienyl π-systems binds to a positive metal and is not nucleophilic.
Figure 4

Optimized geometry of a fragment of the {(Co)·[B12(CN)11Xe]−} salt comprising an assembly of two anions and two cations. Calculation was performed on B3LYP-GD3BJ/6-311G (SDD) level of theory. We note that we optimized the structure of (Co)2[B12(CN)11Xe]2 also on B3LYP-GD3BJ/6-311++G(2d,2p) (SDD) level of theory resulting in a highly similar geometry to the one shown here (see Supplementary Material, section Substitution of Xe via insertion of [B12CN11]− into a C-H bond of Co for coordinates), but no frequency analysis was performed. Co is shown in pale blue. For other atom assignments see Figure 2.
This molecular system between a [B12X11NG]− anionic adducts and a weakly coordinating cation may constitute the first approach to the new generation of ionic noble gas compounds prepared by molecular ion deposition methods. It has been demonstrated that the soft-landing technique is well-suited for the preparation of thin layer materials based on closo-dodecaborate anions (Warneke et al., 2018) and can be also used for the isolation of the products of reactive fragment ions generated in the gas phase (Warneke et al., 2020). We plan to exploit the possibilities of these method for preparation of the bulk phases of the (Co)+·[B12X11Xe]−} salts, which may be classified as supersalts following the recently suggested definition (Giri et al.,
Conclusions
Recently developed anionic electrophiles based on closo-dodecaborate anions have opened up new possibilities for the formation and investigation of room temperature stable anionic NG derivatives and may allow the preparation of a new class of condensed phase NG compounds. Using explanations, which are intuitively understandable to chemist, we have summarized the concepts that explain how the vacant site of rigid anionic electrophiles possesses a unique chemical nature that facilitates binding of noble gases. Computational investigations indicate that the cyanated closo-dodecaborate derivative should form a xenon adduct likely isolable at ambient conditions. Since these NG adducts with anionic electrophiles can be generated only in the gas phase of a mass spectrometer, soft molecular ion deposition methods should be used for their isolation on a solid substrate. For the stabilization of the soft-landed ionic NG species we suggest using a weakly coordinating cation that should be co-deposited with it and serve as a counterion. Using computational methods, we have demonstrated that permethylated cobaltocenium cation may be a suitable candidate for the preparation of the bulk phase NG derivatives of anionic electrophiles. Currently, experimental soft-landing setups capable of performing these experiments are designed and may be used in future to prepare ionic NG-containing material layers that cannot be prepared using the “common” condensed phase synthetic methods.
Methods
All calculations were performed with the Gaussian16 software, revision C.01 (Frisch et al.,
Statements
Data availability statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author contributions
MR performed all computational investigations and co-wrote the manuscript. VA conceived some parts of the concept, performed literature search and analysis, and co-wrote the manuscript. JW initiated, designed, coordinated the study, and wrote the major part of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The authors acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and Universität Leipzig within the program of Open Access Publishing. JW acknowledges a Freigeist Fellowship of the Volkswagen foundation.
Acknowledgments
The computations for this work were done with resources of Leipzig University Computing Center (MR and JW). We acknowledge the great support of our colleagues who developed with us the concept of electrophilic anions. Many thanks go to the Asmis group (Leipzig), the Jenne group (Wuppertal) and the Grabowsky group (Bern). We thank in particular Dr. Martin Mayer for his experimental work with electrophilic anions and for the careful proofreading of this manuscript. JW acknowledges the support from his colleagues at PNNL and Purdue University and is grateful to the Volkswagen foundation for a Freigeist Fellowship.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2020.580295/full#supplementary-material
References
1
BeckeA. D. (1993). Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys.98, 5648–5652. 10.1063/1.464913
2
BochenkovaA. V.BochenkovV. E.KhriachtchevL. (2009). HArF in solid argon revisited: transition from unstable to stable configuration. J. Phys. Chem. A113, 7654–7659. 10.1021/jp810457h
3
BoeseA. D.MartinJ. M. L. (2004). Development of density functionals for thermochemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys.121, 3405–3416. 10.1063/1.1774975
4
BolliC.DerendorfJ.KeßlerM.KnappC.SchererH.SchulzC.et al. (2010). Synthesis, crystal structure, and reactivity of the strong methylating agent Me2B12Cl12. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.49, 3536–3538. 10.1002/anie.200906627
5
BoysS. F.BernardiF. (1970). The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors. Mol. Phys.19, 553–566. 10.1080/00268977000101561
6
BrockD. S.SchrobilgenG. J.ŽemvaB. (2013). Noble-gas chemistry, in Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II (Second Edition): From Elements to Applications (Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd), 755–822. 10.1016/B978-0-08-097774-4.00128-5
7
ClarkT.ChandrasekharJ.SpitznagelG. W.SchleyerP. V. R. (1983). Efficient diffuse function-augmented basis sets for anion calculations. III. The 3-21+G basis set for first-row elements, Li-F. J. Comput. Chem.4, 294–301. 10.1002/jcc.540040303
8
DunningT. H. (1989). Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys.90, 1007–1023. 10.1063/1.456153
9
FischerS.SchimanowitzA.DawsonR.SenkovskaI.KaskelS.ThomasA. (2014). Cationic microporous polymer networks by polymerisation of weakly coordinating cations with CO2-storage ability. J. Mater. Chem. A2, 11825–11829. 10.1039/C4TA02022G
10
FranchettiV.SolkaB. H.BaitingerW. E.AmyJ. W.CooksR. G. (1977). Soft landing of ions as a means of surface modification. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys.23, 29–35. 10.1016/0020-7381(77)80004-1
11
FrenkingG.KochW.ReichelF.CremerD. (1990). Light noble gas chemistry: structures, stabilities, and bonding of helium, neon and argon compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc.112, 4240–4256. 10.1021/ja00167a020
12
FrischM. J.PopleJ. A.BinkleyJ. S. (1984). Self-consistent molecular orbital methods 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets. J. Chem. Phys.80, 3265–3269. 10.1063/1.447079
13
FrischM. J.TrucksG. W.SchlegelH. B.ScuseriaG. E.RobbM. A.CheesemanJ. R.et al. (2016). Gaussian16 Revision C.01. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc.
14
FrohnH. J.BardinV. V. (2001). Preparation and reactivity of compounds containing a carbon-xenon bond. Organometallics20, 4750–4762. 10.1021/om010490j
15
FrohnH. J.JakobsS. (1989). The pentafluorophenylxenon(II) cation: [C6F5Xe]+; the first stable system with a xenon-carbon bond. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.625–627. 10.1039/C39890000625
16
FrohnH. J.KloseA.SchroerT.HenkelG.BussV.OpitzD.et al. (1998). Structural, chemical, and theoretical evidence for the electrophilicity of the [C6F5Xe]+ cation in [C6F5Xe][AsF6]. Inorg. Chem.37, 4884–4890. 10.1021/ic9801903
17
GiriS.BeheraS.JenaP. (2014). Superalkalis and superhalogens as building blocks of supersalts. J. Phys. Chem. A118, 638–645. 10.1021/jp4115095
18
GrandinettiF. (2011). Gas-phase ion chemistry of the noble gases: Recent advances and future perspectives. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom.17, 423–463. 10.1255/ejms.1151
19
GrandinettiF. (2013). Neon behind the signs. Nat. Chem.5:438. 10.1038/nchem.1631
20
GrandinettiF. (2018). Noble Gas Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA. 10.1002/9783527803552
21
GrimmeS.AntonyJ.EhrlichS.KriegH. (2010). A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys.132:154104. 10.1063/1.3382344
22
GrimmeS.EhrlichS.GoerigkL. (2011). Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem.32, 1456–1465. 10.1002/jcc.21759
23
GrochalaW. (2018). On the position of helium and neon in the periodic table of elements. Found. Chem.20, 191–207. 10.1007/s10698-017-9302-7
24
GrueneP.FielickeA.MeijerG.RaynerD. M. (2008). The adsorption of CO on group 10 (Ni, Pd, Pt) transition-metal clusters. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.10, 6144–6149. 10.1039/b808341j
25
HanerJ.SchrobilgenG. J. (2015). The chemistry of xenon(IV). Chem. Rev.115, 1255–1295. 10.1021/cr500427p
26
HeineN.AsmisK. R. (2015). Cryogenic ion trap vibrational spectroscopy of hydrogen-bonded clusters relevant to atmospheric chemistry. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.34, 1–34. 10.1080/0144235X.2014.979659
27
JenaP.SunQ. (2018). Super atomic clusters: design rules and potential for building blocks of materials. Chem. Rev.118, 5755–5870. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00524
28
JinJ.LiW.LiuY.WangG.ZhouM. (2017). Preparation and characterization of chemically bonded argon-boroxol ring cation complexes. Chem. Sci.8, 6594–6600. 10.1039/C7SC02472J
29
JoshiM.GhantyT. K. (2019). Quantum chemical prediction of a superelectrophilic dianion and its binding with noble gas atoms. Chem. Commun.55, 14379–14382. 10.1039/C9CC08049J
30
JoshiM.GhantyT. K. (2020). Unprecedented stability enhancement of multiply charged anions through decoration with negative electron affinity noble gases. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 13368–13372. 10.1039/D0CP01478H
31
JuhaszM.HoffmannS.StoyanovE.KimK.-C.ReedC. A. (2004). The strongest isolable acid. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.43, 5352–5355. 10.1002/anie.200460005
32
KesslerM.KnappC.SagaweV.SchererH.UzunR. (2010). Synthesis, characterization, and crystal structures of silylium compounds of the weakly coordinating dianion [B12Cl12]2−. Inorg. Chem.49, 5223–5230. 10.1021/ic100337k
33
KhriachtchevL.PetterssonM.RunebergN.LundellJ.RäsänenM. (2000). A stable argon compound. Nature406, 874–876. 10.1038/35022551
34
KnappC. (2013). Weakly coordinating anions: halogenated borates and dodecaborates, in Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II (Second Edition): From Elements to Applications (Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd), 651–679. 10.1016/B978-0-08-097774-4.00125-X
35
KoppeK.BilirV.FrohnH. J.MercierH. P. A.SchrobilgenG. J. (2007). Syntheses, solution multi-NMR characterization, and reactivities of [C6F5Xe]+ salts of weakly coordinating borate anions, [BY4]− (Y = CF3, C6F5, CN, or OTeF5). Inorg. Chem.46, 9425–9437. 10.1021/ic7010138
36
KoppeK.FrohnH. J.MercierH. P. A.SchrobilgenG. J. (2008). [C6F5Xe]+ and [C6F5XeNCCH3]+ salts of the weakly coordinating borate anions, [BY4]− (Y = CN, CF3, or C6F5). Inorg. Chem.47, 3205–3217. 10.1021/ic702259c
37
KrishnanR.BinkleyJ. S.SeegerR.PopleJ. A. (1980). Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions. J. Chem. Phys.72, 650–654. 10.1063/1.438955
38
KrossingI.RaabeI. (2004). Noncoordinating anions—fact or fiction? A survey of likely candidates. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.43, 2066–2090. 10.1002/anie.200300620
39
LaskinJ.JohnsonG. E.WarnekeJ.PrabhakaranV. (2018). From isolated ions to multilayer functional materials using ion soft landing. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.57, 16270–16284. 10.1002/anie.201712296
40
LeeC.YangW.ParrR. G. (1988). Development of the colle-salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B37, 785–789. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
41
LehmannJ. F.MercierH. P. A.SchrobilgenG. J. (2002). The chemistry of krypton. Coord. Chem. Rev. 233–234, 1–39. 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00202-3
42
LiebmanJ. F.DeakyneC. A. (2003). Noble gas compounds and chemistry: a brief review of interrelations and interactions with fluorine-containing species. J. Fluor. Chem.121, 1–8. 10.1016/S0022-1139(03)00009-5
43
MalmJ. G.SeligH.JortnerJ.RiceS. A. (1965). The chemistry of xenon. Chem. Rev.65, 199–236. 10.1021/cr60234a003
44
MannL.HornbergerE.SteinhauerS.RiedelS. (2018). Further development of weakly coordinating cations: fluorinated bis(triarylphosphoranylidene)iminium salts. Chem. Eur. J.24, 3902–3908. 10.1002/chem.201705992
45
MayerM.RohdenburgM.van LessenV.NierstenhöferM. C.ApràE.GrabowskyS.et al. (2020). First steps towards a stable neon compound: Observation and bonding analysis of [B12(CN)11Ne]−. Chem. Commun.56, 4591–4594. 10.1039/D0CC01423K
46
MayerM.Van LessenV.RohdenburgM.HouG. L.YangZ.ExnerR. M.et al. (2019). Rational design of an argon-binding superelectrophilic anion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.116, 8167–8172. 10.1073/pnas.1820812116
47
McLeanA. D.ChandlerG. S. (1980). Contracted Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. I. Second row atoms, Z=11–18. J. Chem. Phys.72, 5639–5648. 10.1063/1.438980
48
MiehlichB.SavinA.StollH.PreussH. (1989). Results obtained with the correlation energy density functionals of Becke and Lee, Yang and Parr. Chem. Phys. Lett.157, 200–206. 10.1016/0009-2614(89)87234-3
49
MorganI. S.JenningsM.VindigniA.CléracR.PreussK. E. (2011). [TDNQ][Co] and [TDNQ]3[CoCp2]2; radical anions of a 1,2,5-thiadiazolo-naphthoquinone. Cryst. Growth Des.11, 2520–2527. 10.1021/cg2002783
50
MoritzR.WagnerM.SchollmeyerD.BaumgartenM.MüllenK. (2015). Hydrophobic encapsulated phosphonium salts-synthesis of weakly coordinating cations and their application in Wittig reactions. Chem. Eur. J.21, 9119–9125. 10.1002/chem.201406370
51
NaumannD.ButlerH.GnannR.TyrraW. (1993). Arylxenon tetrafluoroborates: compounds of unexpected stability. Inorg. Chem.32, 861–863. 10.1021/ic00058a018
52
NaumannD.TyrraW. (1989). The first compound with a stable xenon-carbon bond: 19F- and 129Xe-N.M.R. spectroscopic evidence for pentafluorophenylxenon(II) fluoroborates. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.47–50. 10.1039/c39890000047
53
NicklassA.DolgM.StollH.PreussH. (1995). Ab initio energy-adjusted pseudopotentials for the noble gases Ne through Xe: calculation of atomic dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities. J. Chem. Phys.102, 8942–8952. 10.1063/1.468948
54
PanS.JanaG.MerinoG.ChattarajP. K. (2019). Noble-noble strong union: gold at its best to make a bond with a noble gas atom. ChemistryOpen8, 173–187. 10.1002/open.201800257
55
PanS.MorenoD.CabellosJ. L.RomeroJ.ReyesA.MerinoG.et al. (2014). In quest of strong Be-Ng bonds among the neutral Ng-Be complexes. J. Phys. Chem. A118, 487–494. 10.1021/jp409941v
56
PriceC. J.ChenH.-Y.LaunerL. M.MillerS. A. (2009). Weakly coordinating cations as alternatives to weakly coordinating anions. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.48, 956–959. 10.1002/anie.200802605
57
RiddlestoneI. M.KraftA.SchaeferJ.KrossingI. (2018). Taming the cationic beast: novel developments in the synthesis and application of weakly coordinating anions. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.57, 13982–14024. 10.1002/anie.201710782
58
RohdenburgM.MayerM.GrellmannM.JenneC.BorrmannT.KleemissF.et al. (2017). Superelectrophilic behavior of an anion demonstrated by the spontaneous binding of noble gases to [B12Cl11]−. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.56, 7980–7985. 10.1002/anie.201702237
59
RohdenburgM.YangZ.SuP.BernhardtE.YuanQ.ApraE.et al. (2020). Properties of gaseous closo-[B6X6]2− dianions (X = Cl, Br, I). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22:17713. 10.1039/D0CP02581J
60
SahaR.JanaG.PanS.MerinoG.ChattarajP. K. (2019). How far can one push the noble gases towards bonding?: a personal account. Molecules24:2933. 10.3390/molecules24162933
61
SahaR.PanS.FrenkingG.ChattarajP. K.MerinoG. (2017). The strongest CO binding and the highest C-O stretching frequency. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 2286–2293. 10.1039/C6CP06824C
62
SahaR.PanS.MandalS.OrozcoM.MerinoG.ChattarajP. K. (2016). Noble gas supported B3+ cluster: formation of strong covalent noble gas-boron bonds. RSC Adv.6, 78611–78620. 10.1039/C6RA16188J
63
SamantaD. (2014). Prediction of superhalogen-stabilized noble gas compounds. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.5, 3151–3156. 10.1021/jz501404h
64
SimonS.DuranM.DannenbergJ. J. (1996). How does basis set superposition error change the potential surfaces for hydrogen-bonded dimers?J. Chem. Phys.105, 11024–11031. 10.1063/1.472902
65
StraussS. H. (1993). The search for larger and more weakly coordinating anions. Chem. Rev.93, 927–942. 10.1021/cr00019a005
66
SuP.HuH.WarnekeJ.BelovM. E.AndersonG. A.LaskinJ. (2019). Design and performance of a dual-polarity instrument for ion soft landing. Anal. Chem.91, 5904–5912. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00309
67
WagnerJ. P.SchreinerP. R. (2015). London dispersion in molecular chemistry-reconsidering steric effects. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed.54, 12274–12296. 10.1002/anie.201503476
68
WangH.-Y.GaoY.ZhangF.YuC.-T.XuC.GuoY.-L. (2013). Mass spectrometric study of the gas-phase difluorocarbene expulsion of polyfluorophenyl cations via F-atom migration. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.24, 1919–1926. 10.1007/s13361-013-0743-5
69
WangQ.WangX. (2013). Infrared spectra of NgBeS (Ng = Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe) and BeS2 in noble-gas matrices. J. Phys. Chem. A117, 1508–1513. 10.1021/jp311901a
70
WangX.AndrewsL.BrosiF.RiedelS. (2013). Matrix infrared spectroscopy and quantum-chemical calculations for the coinage-metal fluorides: comparisons of Ar-AuF, Ne-AuF, and molecules MF2 and MF3. Chem. Eur. J.19, 1397–1409. 10.1002/chem.201203306
71
WarnekeJ.HouG. L.ApràE.JenneC.YangZ.QinZ.et al. (2017). Electronic structure and stability of [B12X12]2− (X = F-At): a combined photoelectron spectroscopic and theoretical study. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 14749–14756. 10.1021/jacs.7b08598
72
WarnekeJ.MayerM.RohdenburgM.MaX.LiuJ. K. Y.GrellmannM.et al. (2020). Direct functionalization of C-H bonds by electrophilic anions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117:23374–23379. 10.1073/pnas.2004432117
73
WarnekeJ.McBriartyM. E.RiechersS. L.ChinaS.EngelhardM. H.ApràE.et al. (2018). Self-organizing layers from complex molecular anions. Nat. Commun.9, 1–10. 10.1038/s41467-018-04228-2
74
WinklerM.SanderW. (2006). Generation and reactivity of the phenyl cation in cryogenic argon matrices: monitoring the reactions with nitrogen and carbon monoxide directly by IR spectroscopy. J. Org. Chem.71, 6357–6367. 10.1021/jo0603678
75
ZhaoH.ZhouJ.JenaP. (2016). Stability of B12 : implications for lithium and magnesium ion batteries. Angew. Chemie128, 3768–3772. 10.1002/ange.201600275
76
ZhuT.ShaY.FirouzjaieH. A.PengX.ChaY.DissanayakeD. M. M. M.et al. (2020). Rational synthesis of metallo-cations toward redox- and alkaline-stable metallo-polyelectrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 1083–1089. 10.1021/jacs.9b12051
Summary
Keywords
noble gas compounds, closo-dodecaborates, anionic electrophiles, mass spectrometry, collision induced dissociation, weakly coordinating cations, soft landing, DFT calculations
Citation
Rohdenburg M, Azov VA and Warneke J (2020) New Perspectives in the Noble Gas Chemistry Opened by Electrophilic Anions. Front. Chem. 8:580295. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.580295
Received
05 July 2020
Accepted
05 October 2020
Published
13 November 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Sudip Pan, University of Marburg, Germany
Reviewed by
Purusottam Jena, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States; Felice Grandinetti, University of Tuscia, Italy; Gabriel Merino, Center for Research and Advanced Studies - Mérida Unit, Mexico
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Rohdenburg, Azov and Warneke.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Vladimir A. Azov AzovV@ufs.ac.zaJonas Warneke jonas.warneke@uni-leipzig.de
This article was submitted to Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.