Abstract
Borophene has important application value, boron nanomaterials doped with transition metal have wondrous structures and chemical bonding. However, little attention was paid to the boron nanowires (NWs). Inspired by the novel metal boron clusters Ln2Bn− (Ln = La, Pr, Tb, n = 7–9) adopting inverse sandwich configuration, we examined Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters in such novel structure and found that they are the global minima and show good stability. Thus, based on the novel structural moiety and first-principles calculations, we connected the inverse sandwich clusters into one-dimensional (1D) nanowires by sharing B−B bridges between adjacent clusters, and the 1D-Sc4B24 and 1D-Y2B12 were reached after structural relaxation. The two nanowires were identified to be stable in thermodynamical, dynamical and thermal aspects. Both nanowires are nonmagnetic, the 1D-Sc4B24 NW is a direct-bandgap semiconductor, while the 1D-Y2B12 NW shows metallic feature. Our theoretical results revealed that the inverse sandwich structure is the most energy-favored configuration for transition metal borides Sc2B8 and Y2B8, and the inverse sandwich motif can be extended to 1D nanowires, providing useful guidance for designing novel boron-based nanowires with diverse electronic properties.
Introduction
Boron-based materials were found wide applications in the fileds of emissions, supercapacitors, optical absorptions, photodetectors, etc. (Xu et al., 2013; Sussardi et al., 2015; Akopov et al., 2017; Carenco et al., 2013; Tian et al., 2019). Unlike the extensive attention on carbon clusters such as fullerenes and carbon fibers, boron clusters and materials are relatively less studied by scientists. However, there is much space and potential to develop boron-based nanomaterials.
Boron shows a strong tendency to form multi-center-two-electron bonds (mc-2e) in both polyhedral molecules and bulk isotopes (Wang, 2016; Jian et al., 2019; Lipscomb, 1977; Alexandrova et al., 2006) due to its electron deficiency. Therefore, boron clusters have the characteristic of electron delocalization bonding with some delocalized electronic structures and unique aromaticity (Li et al., 2018). In the past two decades, the structure and chemical bonding of bare boron clusters have been studied by combining experimental and theoretical methods (Li et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017; Pan et al., 2019), and planar clusters, nanotube-like cluster structures, graphene-like boron spheres and fullerene-like boron spheres have been found (Kiran et al., 2005; Piazza et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014; Bai et al., 2019; Zhai et al., 2014). Also due to the characteristic of electron deficiency, boron can be doped with metal to form different kinds of metal boride structures. Boron has formed a large number of important boride materials, ranging from superconducting MgB2 and superhard transition metal borides to borides with extremely high thermal conductivity (Nagamatsu et al., 2001; Chung et al., 2007).
As the 5th element adjacent to carbon in the periodic table, ring and cage boron clusters have poor stability due to their electron-deficient properties. However, the introduction of transition metals can greatly improve the stability of boron clusters. Transition-metal-doped boron clusters have led to a new direction of boron nanomaterials, such as the metal-centered aromatic borometallic wheels and tubular metal-centered drums (Romanescu et al., 2011; Popov et al., 2015; Jian et al., 2016; Jian et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). On the other hand, assembling boron clusters by doping them with different types of atoms is a potential way to change properties. For example, CoB18‒ and RhB18‒ planar clusters have been found, which makes it possible to dope metal with borographene (Li et al., 2016; Jian et al., 2016). Wang and Boldyrev’s joint research group have reported a variety of neutral or charged planar wheel clusters centered on supercoordination transition metals M©Bn (M = Fe, Co, Nb, Ru, Rh, Ir, Ta; n = 8–10) (Romanescu et al., 2011).
Recently, Wang’s experimental group and Li’s theoretical group jointly observed several new metal boron clusters Ln2Bn− (Ln = La, Pr, Tb; n = 7–9) with an inverse sandwich structure (Li et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019). It is found that these clusters have the double aromatic properties of π and σ bonding contributions, showing high stability and symmetry, and the magnetization of B8‒ ring is high. The study provides a novel pattern for the design of new lanthanide borides, and a few inverse sandwich complexes were proposed (Wang et al., 2019; Cui et al., 2020; Shakerzadeh et al., 2020; Xiao et al., 2021). A few questions arise naturally: Would the transition metal borides adopt the inverse sandwich structure in a stable manner? Can the inverse sandwich structure motif be extended to periodic nanomaterials, like designing the super stable 1D-P10 nanowire and 2D-P8N2 nanosheet based on all pentagon containing P8 clusters (Wang et al., 2020; Dong et al., 2021)? Thus, in this work, by means of first-principles calculations, we examined the stability of M2B8 (M = Sc and Y) clusters with the inverse sandwich structure, and extended the inverse sandwich moiety to design novel boron-based nanowires (NWs). The constructed 1D-Sc4B24 and 1D-Y2B12 NWs show good stability, and the former/later one is a semiconductor/metal. Our theoretical work successfully extended the inverse sandwich moiety to the 1D crystals, which is helpful to design novel boron-based nanowires with diverse electronic properties.
Methods
The comprehensive genetic algorithm (CGA) (Zhao et al., 2016) combined with the DMol3 program (Delley, 1990; Delley, 2000) was used to search the global minimum of Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters. The low-energy clusters generated by CGA were further optimized using density functional theory (DFT) implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) code (Kresse and Furthmuller, 1996; Kresse and Hafner, 1993; Kresse and Hafner, 1994). The exchange and correlation functional are defined by the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional (Perdew et al., 1996). The k points of the geometric optimization and the molecular dynamics simulation were set to 1 × 7 × 1 and 1 × 3 × 1. The phonon spectra were calculated by VASP and Phonopy codes (Togo and Tanaka, 2015). Thermal stability was assessed at 300 and 500 K based on first-principles molecular dynamics [FPMD simulations conducted at the DFT level using a canonical ensemble having a constant number of atoms, volume with the temperature controlled by the Nosé-Hoover thermostat (Martyna et al., 1992; Kresse and Hafner, 1993)], and temperature (NVT) with 1 fs time steps for a total simulated time duration of 5 ps. The band structures of the designed nanowires were calculated by PBE and Heyd-Suseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) hybrid functional (Heyd et al., 2003). To predict the clusters and nanowires in a more reliable manner, we also considered the PBE + D2 approach (Bučko et al., 2010). Almost no difference was found between the PBE-D2 and PBE structures and cohesive energies.
Results
Structure, Stability and Magnetic Properties of Sc2B8 and Y2B8 Clusters
Based on the inverse sandwich structure of La2B8−, we optimized the neutral transition metal boron clusters of the same configuration—Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters (the two Sc/Y atoms locate symmetrically to the two sides of the B8 ring). In Figure 1, M−B (M = Sc and Y) and B−B bond lengths in two cluster structures are given. For the cluster Sc2B8, the bond lengths of Sc−B (dSc−B) and B−B (dB−B) are 1.68 and 1.62 Å, respectively. For the cluster Y2B8, Y−B bond length (dY−B) is 2.81 Å and the bond length of B−B (dB−B) is 1.62 Å. Both two optimized neutral clusters well preserve the inverse sandwich structure of D8h symmetry.
FIGURE 1
As shown in Supplementary Figure S1, the two vibrational spectra have simple vibration modes due to the high symmetry, and no negative mode was found, indicating the stability of these two clusters. In the Sc2B8 cluster, the intensity peaks of 144 and 752 cm−1 can be assigned to Sc−B bond and B−B bond vibrations, respectively. The sharp asymmetric oscillations in the Y2B8 cluster are at 149 and 721 cm−1, indicating the vibration modes of the Y−B bond and the B−B bond, respectively.
At the same time, a FPMD simulation lasting for 5 ps was performed for both clusters at room temperature (300 K). The annealed structures well remain the original inverse sandwich configuration, as shown in Supplementary Figure S2, which also suggests the good stability of the Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters adopting inverse sandwich structure.
Furthermore, CGA was used to generate low-energy isomers of Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters. The four low-lying structures, and an isomer, which can be viewed as the B-centered B7 ring sandwiched by two Sc/Y atoms, were presented in Supplementary Figure S3, and the inverse sandwich configuration for both Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters is the most stable one (0.69–1.34 eV lower than the other four low-energy isomers at PBE-D2 level of theory). In particular, the CCSD(T) test computations also support the PBE-D2 results that the inverse sandwich structures are much lower in energy than other isomers. Thus it is feasible to synthesize the inverse sandwich Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters in experiments.
Additionally, we examined the dissociation of inverse sandwich M2B8 (M = Sc, Y) clusters. For the first M dissociation (M2B8 → M + MB8), the reaction is endothermic by 2.11 and 2.08 eV, respectively for M = Sc and Y; and for removing the second M (MB8 → M + B8), it is also an endothermic reaction with the energy input of 2.37 and 2.17 eV for M = Sc and Y, respectively. The highly endothermic dissociations of M from B8, indicate reaction barriers are >2 eV. Meanwhile, when the M atoms were put 5 Å from the B8 center, it will be optimized to the energetically favored inverse sandwich structure. The above results as summarized in Supplementary Figure S4 again confirmed that the M2B8 (M = Sc, Y) clusters with inverse sandwich configuration are highly stable.
Besides, we further explored magnetic properties of the global minimum structures. Three magnetic configurations were compared, namely, antiferromagnetic (AFM), ferromagnetic (FM) and nonmagnetic (NM) states. We set the energy value of NM as 0 eV and all other energy values as their relative differences. Our calculations revealed that both Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters are nonmagnetic (Table 1).
TABLE 1
| NM | FM | AFM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sc2B8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Y2B8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Relative energies of Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters with different magnetic configurations (in eV).
Structure and Stability of 1D Nanowires
Considering that the Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters of inverse sandwich configuration are the global minima, the inverse sandwich structural moiety might be extended to a periodic manner. Therefore, we connected the inverse sandwich clusters into 1D nanowires by sharing B−B bridges between adjacent clusters, similar to the observation of inverse triple-decker La3B14− (Chen et al., 2019). The 1D-Sc4B24 and 1D-Y2B12 nanowires were obtained after structural relaxation as displayed in Figure 2. For the optimized 1D-Sc4B24 (Figure 2A), neither the inverse sandwich moiety of Sc2B8 nor the sharing B−B bonds was clearly observed, largely due to the formation of B4 rhombus, which is regarded as a stable unit of boron analogs. The shared B–B (dB−B) key length is ∼1.59 Å, and the other B–B (dB−B) lengths are in the range of 1.58–1.62 Å. The Sc–B bond lengths (dSc−B) are 2.41–2.49 Å. In contrast, for the 1D-Y2B12 NW (Figure 2B), the unitcell is formed by two Y2B8 clusters of inverse sandwich moiety by sharing a B−B bond. The length of the shared B−B bond (dB−B) is 1.56 Å, the lengths of others B−B bonds are ranged from 1.56 to 1.60 Å. The Y–B bond lengths (dY−B) are ranged in 2.56–2.72 Å. Compared to the free cluster structures, the dY−B were compressed in 1D-Y2B12 nanowire, while the dSc−B were significantly stretched in the 1D-Sc4B24, indicating that although Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters have the same structure, they have different structural characteristics when forming one-dimensional nanowires.
FIGURE 2
In order to confirm the stability of the two nanowires, we first examined their thermodynamic stability by calculating the cohesive energy (Ecoh). In our work, the cohesive energy is defined as equation 1, where, E1/E2 is the energy of an isolated transition metal atoms (Sc or Y)/B atom, Etot is the total energy of nanowire, n/m is the number of transition metal/B atoms.
According to the above definition of cohesive energy, the larger the calculated value is, the more stable the structure is. The calculated cohesive energies of 1D-Sc4B24 and 1D-Y2B12 nanowires are 5.92 and 6.00 eV/atom, respectively, much larger than the Ecoh values of the clusters (5.35 and 5.29 eV/atom, respectively for Sc2B8 and Y2B8). These high cohesion energies show that two 1D nanowires have good thermodynamic stability.
Then, we calculated the phonon dispersion to investigate their dynamic stability. In these phonon dispersions, no imaginary frequencies were observed (Figure 3), indicating that the two designed nanowires based on the inverse sandwich Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters are dynamically stable.
FIGURE 3
Finally, we performed FPMD simulations in order to access their thermal stability with the supercell of 112 atoms (16 transition metal atoms and 96 B atoms). The 1D-Sc16B96 was annealed at 300 K for 5 ps, and the final structure retained the original B8 rings (Supplementary Figure S5A), and the structure obtained remains intact. For the one-dimensional nanowire structure constructed by Y2B8, we conducted two 5 ps simulation at room temperature of 300 K (Supplementary Figure S5B) and 500 K (Supplementary Figure S5), respectively. The 1D-Y16B96 structure still showed structural integrity under both simulation conditions. It also preserves structural integrity at 500 K in particular. The results of FPMD simulations confirm that two designed nanowires possess good thermal stability.
Magnetic and Electronic Properties
Through the above analysis of thermodynamic, dynamic and thermal stability, it is found that the two designed nanowires are stable. Therefore, we further explored the magnetic and electronic properties of the two nanowires. For the magnetic feature, five magnetic orderings were considered, namely AFM (including AFM1: − + − +, AFM2: + − − +, and AFM3: − − + +, Supplementary Figure S7, FM, and NM. Our computations showed that neither 1D-Sc4B24 nor 1D-Y2B12 is magnetic. The relative energies of examined magnetic configurations of the two structures were given in Table 2. In addition, through the analysis of charge transfer, we found that each Sc/Y atom transferred ∼1.5/2.0 electrons to boron. The differential charge density diagrams of the two 2D nanostructures (Figure 4) showed that the electrons have delocalized bonding characteristics.
TABLE 2
| NM | FM | AFM1 | AFM2 | AFM3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D-Sc4B24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1D- Y2B12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Relative energies of 1D- Sc4B24 and 1D-Y2B12 nanowires with various magnetic configurations (in eV).
FIGURE 4
We used the PBE method to predict the electronic band structures of the two designed nanowires (Figure 5). Compared to the metallicity of teetotum cluster Li2FeB14 based nanowire (Shakerzadeh et al., 2020), the 1D-Sc4B24 nanowire is a direct-bandgap semiconductor with the bandgap of 0.51 eV, while the 1D-Y2B12 NW is a metal, and the p orbital of B dominates the state near the Fermi level. The commonly used PBE method usually underestimates the bandgaps. Therefore, we also used HSE06 method to calculate the electronic band structure of 1D-Sc4B24 nanowire, as shown in Supplementary Figure S8. The bandgap calculated by the HSE06 method is about 0.85 eV, 0.34 eV larger than the PBE value. The different electronic behavior of the two designed nanowires may originate from the different structures (Zeng et al., 2019).
FIGURE 5
Conclusion
In summary, by means of first-principles calculations combined with CGA search, we found that Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters of inverse sandwich structure are the lowest-energy isomers and have good stability, and we constructed one-dimensional nanowires containing the structural moiety of the two clusters. The high stability of 1D-Sc4B24 and 1D-Y2B12 nanowires is confirmed by the investigation of thermodynamical, dynamical and thermal perspectives. Both 1D-Sc4B24 and 1D-Y2B12 nanowires are nonmagnetic; in terms of electronic behavior, the 1D-Sc4B24 is semiconducting with the HSE06 bandgap of 0.85 eV, while the 1D-Y2B12 is metallic. Our theoretical work not only identified the inverse sandwich configuration as the lowest-energy one for transition metal borides Sc2B8 and Y2B8 clusters, but also successfully extended the inverse sandwich moiety to 1D nanomaterials. Thus, it is helpful to design novel boron-based nanowires for both experimental and theoretical communities.
Permission to Reuse and Copyright
Figures, tables, and images will be published under a Creative Commons CC-BY licence and permission must be obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including re-published/adapted/modified/partial figures and images from the internet). It is the responsibility of the authors to acquire the licenses, to follow any citation instructions requested by third-party rights holders, and cover any supplementary charges.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
CJ contributed to calculations, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, and funding acquisition. ZL performed formal analysis and writing—original draft. SL performed data curation and investigation. LS and SW performed methodology, investigation, writing—original draft, and supervision, and funding acquisition. FL contributed to conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration, and supervision.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11964024, 1804076), the “Grassland Talents” project of Inner Mongolia autonomous region (12000-12102613), and the Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates of Inner Mongolia University (201810126056).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.753617/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AkopovG.YeungM. T.KanerR. B. (2017). Rediscovering the Crystal Chemistry of Borides. Adv. Mater.29, 1604506. 10.1002/adma.201604506
2
AlexandrovaA. N.BoldyrevA. I.ZhaiH.-J.WangL.-S. (2006). All-boron Aromatic Clusters as Potential New Inorganic Ligands and Building Blocks in Chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev.250, 2811–2866. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.032
3
BaiH.ChenT.-T.ChenQ.ZhaoX.-Y.ZhangY.-Y.ChenW.-J.et al (2019). Planar B41− and B42− Clusters with Double-Hexagonal Vacancies. Nanoscale11, 23286–23295. 10.1039/C9NR09522E
4
BučkoT.HafnerJ.LebègueS.ÁngyánJ. G. (2010). Improved Description of the Structure of Molecular and Layered Crystals: Ab Initio DFT Calculations with van der Waals Corrections. J. Phys. Chem. A.114, 11814–11824. 10.1021/jp106469x
5
CarencoS.PortehaultD.BoissièreC.MézaillesN.SanchezC. (2013). Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives. Chem. Rev.113, 7981–8065. 10.1021/cr400020d
6
ChenT.-T.LiW.-L.LiJ.WangL.-S. (2019). [La(ηx-Bx)La]− (X = 7-9): a New Class of Inverse sandwich Complexes. Chem. Sci.10, 2534–2542. 10.1039/C8SC05443F
7
ChungH.-Y.WeinbergerM. B.LevineJ. B.KavnerA.YangJ.-M.TolbertS. H.et al (2007). Synthesis of Ultra-incompressible Superhard Rhenium Diboride at Ambient Pressure. Science316, 436–439. 10.1126/science.1139322
8
CuiZ.-H.ChenC.WangQ.ZhaoL.WangM.-H.DingY.-h. (2020). Inverse sandwich Complexes of B7M2−, B8M2, and B9M2+ (M = Zr, Hf): the Nonclassical M-M Bonds Embedded in Monocyclic boron Rings. New J. Chem.44, 17705–17713. 10.1039/D0NJ03999C
9
DelleyB. (1990). An All‐electron Numerical Method for Solving the Local Density Functional for Polyatomic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys.92, 508–517. 10.1063/1.458452
10
DelleyB. (2000). From Molecules to Solids with the DMol3 Approach. J. Chem. Phys.113, 7756–7764. 10.1063/1.1316015
11
DongY.WangS.YuC.LiF.GongJ.ZhaoJ. (2021). First-principles Explorations on P8 and N2 Assembled Nanowire and Nanosheet. Nano Express2, 010004. 10.1088/2632-959X/abd899
12
HeydJ.ScuseriaG. E.ErnzerhofM. (2003). Hybrid Functionals Based on a Screened Coulomb Potential. J. Chem. Phys.118, 8207–8215. 10.1063/1.1564060
13
JianT.ChenX.LiS.-D.BoldyrevA. I.LiJ.WangL.-S. (2019). Probing the Structures and Bonding of Size-Selected Boron and Doped-boron Clusters. Chem. Soc. Rev.48, 3550–3591. 10.1039/C9CS00233B
14
JianT.LiW.-L.ChenX.ChenT.-T.LopezG. V.LiJ.et al (2016). Competition between Drum and Quasi-Planar Structures in RhB18−: Motifs for Metallo-Boronanotubes and Metallo-Borophenes. Chem. Sci.7, 7020–7027. 10.1039/C6SC02623K
15
JianT.LiW.-L.PopovI. A.LopezG. V.ChenX.BoldyrevA. I.et al (2016). Manganese-centered Tubular boron Cluster - MnB16−: A New Class of Transition-Metal Molecules. J. Chem. Phys.144, 154310. 10.1063/1.4946796
16
KiranB.BulusuS.ZhaiH.-J.YooS.ZengX. C.WangL.-S. (2005). Planar-to-tubular Structural Transition in boron Clusters: B20 as the Embryo of Single-Walled boron Nanotubes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.102, 961–964. 10.1073/pnas.0408132102
17
KresseG.FurthmüllerJ. (1996). Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15–50. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
18
KresseG.HafnerJ. (1993). Ab Initiomolecular Dynamics for Liquid Metals. Phys. Rev. B47, 558–561. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558
19
KresseG.HafnerJ. (1994). Ab Initiomolecular-Dynamics Simulation of the Liquid-Metal-Amorphous-Semiconductor Transition in Germanium. Phys. Rev. B.49, 14251–14269. 10.1103/physrevb.49.14251
20
LiW.-L.ChenQ.TianW.-J.BaiH.ZhaoY.-F.HuH.-S.et al (2014). The B35 Cluster with a Double-Hexagonal Vacancy: A New and More Flexible Structural Motif for Borophene. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 12257–12260. 10.1021/ja507235s
21
LiW.-L.ChenT.-T.XingD.-H.ChenX.LiJ.WangL.-S. (2018). Observation of Highly Stable and Symmetric Lanthanide Octa-boron Inverse Sandwich Complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.115, E6972–E6977. 10.1073/pnas.1806476115
22
LiW.-L.ChenX.JianT.ChenT.-T.LiJ.WangL.-S. (2017). From Planar Boron Clusters to Borophenes and Metalloborophenes. Nat. Rev. Chem.1, 0071. 10.1038/s41570-017-0071
23
LiW.-L.HuH.-S.ZhaoY.-F.ChenX.ChenT.-T.JianT.et al (2018). Recent Progress on the Investigations of boron Clusters and boron-based Materials (I): Borophene. Sci. Sin.-Chim.48, 98–107. 10.1360/N032017-00185
24
LiW.-L.JianT.ChenX.LiH.-R.ChenT.-T.LuoX.-M.et al (2017). Observation of a Metal-Centered B2-Ta@B18−tubular Molecular Rotor and a Perfect Ta@B20−boron Drum with the Record Coordination Number of Twenty. Chem. Commun.53, 1587–1590. 10.1039/C6CC09570D
25
LiW. L.JianT.ChenX.ChenT. T.LopezG. V.LiJ.et al (2016). The Planar CoB 18 − Cluster as a Motif for Metallo‐Borophenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 7358–7363. 10.1002/anie.201601548
26
LipscombW. N. (1977). The Boranes and Their Relatives. Science196, 1047–1055. 10.1126/science.196.4294.1047
27
MartynaG. J.KleinM. L.TuckermanM. (1992). Nosé-Hoover Chains: The Canonical Ensemble via Continuous Dynamics. J. Chem. Phys.97, 2635–2643. 10.1063/1.463940
28
NagamatsuJ.NakagawaN.MuranakaT.ZenitaniY.AkimitsuJ. (2001). Superconductivity at 39 K in Magnesium Diboride. Nature410, 63–64. 10.1038/35065039
29
PanS.BarrosoJ.JalifeS.HeineT.AsmisK. R.MerinoG. (2019). Fluxional Boron Clusters: From Theory to Reality. Acc. Chem. Res.52, 2732–2744. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00336
30
PerdewJ. P.BurkeK.ErnzerhofM. (1996). Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865–3868. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
31
PiazzaZ. A.HuH.-S.LiW.-L.ZhaoY.-F.LiJ.WangL.-S. (2014). Planar Hexagonal B36 as a Potential Basis for Extended Single-Atom Layer boron Sheets. Nat. Commun.5, 2014. 10.1038/ncomms4113
32
PopovI. A.JianT.LopezG. V.BoldyrevA. I.WangL.-S. (2015). Cobalt-centred boron Molecular Drums with the Highest Coordination Number in the CoB16− Cluster. Nat. Commun.6. 10.1038/ncomms9654
33
RomanescuC.GaleevT. R.LiW.-L.BoldyrevA. I.WangL.-S. (2011). Aromatic Metal-Centered Monocyclic Boron Rings: CoB8− and RuB9−. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.50, 9334−9337. 10.1002/anie.201104166
34
ShakerzadehE.DuongL. V.Pham-HoM. P.TahmasebiE.NguyenM. T. (2020). The Teetotum Cluster Li2FeB14 and its Possible Use for Constructing boron Nanowires. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 15013–15021. 10.1039/D0CP02046J
35
SussardiA.TanakaT.KhanA. U.SchlapbachL.MoriT. (2015). Enhanced Thermoelectric Properties of Samarium Boride. J. Materiomics1, 196–204. 10.1016/j.jmat.2015.07.007
36
TianY.GuoZ.ZhangT.LinH.LiZ.ChenJ.et al (2019). Inorganic Boron-Based Nanostructures: Synthesis, Optoelectronic Properties, and Prospective Applications. Nanomaterials9, 538. 10.3390/nano9040538
37
TogoA.TanakaI. (2015). First Principles Phonon Calculations in Materials Science. Scripta Materialia108, 1–5. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021
38
WangL.-S. (2016). Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Size-Selected Boron Clusters: From Planar Structures to Borophenes and Borospherenes. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.35, 69–142. 10.1080/0144235X.2016.1147816
39
WangS.GuJ.DongY.SaiL.LiF. (2020). A Super Stable Assembled P Nanowire with Variant Structural and Magnetic/Electronic Properties via Transition Metal Adsorption. Nanoscale12, 12454–12461. 10.1039/D0NR02176H
40
WangY.-J.MiaoC.-Q.XieJ.-J.WeiY.-R.RenG.-M. (2019). Be2B6 and Be2B7+: Two Double Aromatic Inverse sandwich Complexes with Spin-Triplet Ground State. New J. Chem.43, 15979–15982. 10.1039/C9NJ02819F
41
XiaoY.ZhaoX.-K.WuT.MillerJ. T.HuH.-S.LiJ.et al (2021). Distinct Electronic Structures and Bonding Interactions in Inverse-Sandwich Samarium and Ytterbium Biphenyl Complexes. Chem. Sci.12, 227–238. 10.1039/D0SC03555F
42
XuJ.HouG.LiH.ZhaiT.DongB.YanH.et al (2013). Fabrication of Vertically Aligned Single-Crystalline Lanthanum Hexaboride Nanowire Arrays and Investigation of Their Field Emission. NPG Asia Mater.5, e53. 10.1038/am.2013.25
43
ZengY. J.WuD.CaoX. H.ZhouW. X.TangL. M.ChenK. Q. (2019). Nanoscale Organic Thermoelectric Materials: Measurement, Theoretical Models, and Optimization Strategies. Adv. Funct. Mater.30, 1903873. 10.1002/adfm.201903873
44
ZhaiH.-J.ZhaoY.-F.LiW.-L.ChenQ.BaiH.HuH.-S.et al (2014). Observation of an All-Boron Fullerene. Nat. Chem.6, 727–731. 10.1038/nchem.1999
45
ZhaoJ.ShiR.SaiL.HuangX.SuY. (2016). Comprehensive Genetic Algorithm Forab Initioglobal Optimisation of Clusters. Mol. Simulation42, 809–819. 10.1080/08927022.2015.1121386
Summary
Keywords
first-principles, clusters, inverse sandwich structure, boron-based nanowires, magnetic and electronic properties
Citation
Jiang C, Lv Z, Lv S, Sai L, Wang S and Li F (2021) Theoretical Design of Novel Boron-Based Nanowires via Inverse Sandwich Clusters. Front. Chem. 9:753617. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.753617
Received
05 August 2021
Accepted
30 August 2021
Published
17 September 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Iwona Anusiewicz, University of Gdansk, Poland
Reviewed by
Ke-Qiu Chen, Hunan University, China
Junjie He, University of Bremen, Germany
Celina Sikorska, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Jiang, Lv, Lv, Sai, Wang and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Linwei Sai, sailinwei@hhu.edu.cn; Shukai Wang, wangshukai0323@163.com; Fengyu Li, fengyuli@imu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.