Abstract
In this study, a kind of graphene oxide-cuprous oxide (GO-Cu2O) nanocomposites was fabricated with different morphologies to serve as a photocatalytic material for the degradation of organic/inorganic dyes under visible light and the bactericidal effect against pathogenic bacteria. The GO-Cu2O was prepared with solid cube and hollow dodecahedra morphologies through in-situ synthesis, and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman, Ultraviolet and visible spectrophotometry (UV/vis), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. In comparison with cubic GO-Cu2O, the absorption and degradation efficiency of the GO-Cu2O dodecahedra (GCD) composite in Methyl orange (MO), Rhodamine B (RhB), and phenol was higher owning to the more active sites for the simultaneous dye and light absorption of hollow structure. The antibacterial effect of the GO-Cu2O dodecahedra was examined by the flat colony counting method with an excellent bactericidal effect against pathogenic bacteria. The possible mechanism for the preparation of GCD possessing the enhancement of the visible-light photocatalytic and antibacterial efficiencies were also investigated.
Introduction
Water pollution causes great damage to ecosystems, human health, as well as the sustainable economic and social development because the pollutant complex, along with bacteria, cause difficulty in decontamination by conventional water treatment processes (Schwarzenbach et al., 2010; Wang and Yang, 2016). Hence, developing an effective and facile way to degrade pollutants has become an active area in environmental research. Recently, inorganic nanomaterials have attracted numerous attentions because of their controllable shapes and sizes, as well as their effective photocatalytic activities, such as those in metal oxide semiconductors (e.g. TiO2, ZnO) or narrow band gap semiconductors (e.g. Ag3PO4) (Shao et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020).
Although these inorganic materials exhibit promising photocatalytic activities, there are still several problems that need to be overcome, for instance, relatively poor light-harvesting abilities in the visible region, the use of toxic or harmful chemicals, or poor charge separation and transport. Cuprous oxide (Cu2O) is a promising metal oxide material in the application of photocatalysis because it is a p-type semiconductor (C hole > C electron) with a small band gap (Eg = 2.17 eV). Recently, numerous efforts have been devoted to synthesize Cu2O with different morphologies such as nanowires, octahedra, cuboctahedra, and nanocubes (Hua et al., 2011; Deng et al., 2012; Hou et al., 2013; Hong et al., 2014). Among them, a hollow structure has intrinsic advantages in photocatalysis applications Xiao et al. (2019), such as enhancing light harvesting Li et al. (2007), Wang et al. (2012), Wu et al. (2013), Dinh et al. (2014), Qi et al. (2014), promoting the synergistic effects of light scattering and localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) Zhang et al. (2014), Shi et al. (2016), reducing charge recombination Marschall (2014), Li et al. (2015), and accelerating surface reactions due to a high surface area (Sun et al., 2003; Vaughn and Schaak, 2012; Wang et al., 2017). Furthermore, due to a large carbon sheet structure, graphene oxide (GO) was also introduced in a hybrid with Cu2O to effectively increase the adsorption sites and improve the transfer of electrons between the materials for the inhibition of hole and electron recombination. The addition of carbon based 2D materials during the in-situ preparation of the nanoparticles may improve the photocatalytic performance effectively (Khan et al., 2015; Khan et al., 2016a; Khan et al., 2016b; Khan et al., 2017; Ahmed and Haider, 2018; Khan et al., 2018). Lee and his group synthesized Ag-Cu2O together with graphene oxide for the enhanced photocatalytic performance (Sharma et al., 2018). SunilMeti et al. reported zinc oxide nanocomposites wrapped with reduced graphene oxide to enhance the photocatalytic activity (Meti et al., 2018).
Herein, the nontoxic and novel visible-light-driven GO-Cu2O composite was used as an inspiring photocatalytic material to address the aforementioned problems in water pollution. In this work, aqueous solutions of copper salt, alkali, surfactant, and reductant were used to prepare hollow dodecahedral Cu2O through an in-situ synthesis process. The GO sheet was added through an electrostatic reaction of negatively charged GO and Cu ions and leaving a final modified GO-Cu2O hollow dodecahedral (GCD) structure. The solid cubic GO-Cu2O structures were also fabricated by systematically changing the reductant amount for comparison. After the successful preparation of the crystal components, the structures were characterized and confirmed. The photocatalytic performance of the GO-Cu2O in different dyes under visible light were investigated and compared, while the antibacterial performance was evaluated by a flat colony counting method and TEM. In general, the as-prepared GCD enhanced light-harvesting, separated the excited e−-h+ pairs, and promoted charge transfer. The increased reactive oxygen species generated from visible irradiation made the oxidation of the organic pollutant and elimination of the bacteria possible, as shown in Scheme 1.
SCHEME 1
Experimental Details
Materials and Characterization
Anhydrous copper (II) chloride (CuCl2; 97%), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH2OHHCl; 99%), sodium hydroxide (98.2%), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; 100%), graphite and methyl alcohol are purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent limited corporation. Graphene oxide (GO) is synthesized from graphite using the improved Hummers method with additional KMnO4 (Yang et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013a; Yang et al., 2013b; Qin et al., 2015). All chemicals are used as obtained without further purification. Deionized water is used in all the procedures.
The characterizations, photocatalytic activity, and bactericidal activity tests were described in the supporting information.
Synthesis of Graphene Oxide-Cuprous Oxide Nanocomposites With Different Morphologies
In a typical synthesis, different volumes of water were used to obtain the final 1 L solution (Deng et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012). Flasks containing CuCl2 solution (0.1 M, 50 ml) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (8.7 g, SDS; 100%) were placed in a water bath and kept at 32°C. Then, NaOH (1.0 M, 18 ml) was added in dropwise with vigorous stirring. A Cu(OH)2 precipitate was formed and the color of the solution changed from dark blue to light blue. Different amounts of NH2OHHCl (solid cube: 40 ml; hollow dodecahedra: 240 ml) were then poured within 5 s and left to cool down to RT. The final products were then dried and obtained after washing several times with DI water/ethanol. The GCD nanocomposites were synthesized via a similar route as the Cu2O, except that 40 mg GO was sonicated into the deionized water at the beginning.
Results and Discussion
With the addition of the NH2OHHCl reductant during the in-situ process, the Cu(OH)2 was the first nucleation seed and then the Cu2O nanocrystals grew on the surface to form various morphologies. The higher concentration of the NH2OHHCl increased the growth rate of the Cu2O and changed the morphology from a cube to a dodecahedron, while the HCl from the reductant etched the Cu2O to form the final hollow structure (Kuo and Huang, 2008).
The morphologies of the samples were characterized by SEM. Figure 1A showed that the synthesized CC possessed a cube morphology of about 100–500 nm in size. From the SEM image in Figure 1B, CD displayed a dodecahedron morphology, and the average diameter was about 300 nm, most of which were broken or full of holes. After the addition of GO to the samples, the ionic interaction between the Cu cations and GO− anions modified the Cu2O morphology. The SEM image of the GCC composites (Figure 1C) highlighted the presence of cube-like Cu2O polyhedrons with a uniform size of less than 200 nm, most of which were wrapped by GO sheets. The addition of GO also initiated a minor change of the morphology. The GCD in Figure 1D illustrated that the dodecahedron-like particles have an average diameter of about 100–200 nm.
FIGURE 1
The solid cubes and hollow dodecahedra were also characterized by TEM. The size of the CC particles coated with the GO sheets (Figure 2A) was estimated to be between 150–200 nm, which was consistent with the SEM image of the GCC particles in Figure 1C. Figure 2B was a typical TEM image of CD covered with a small quantity of GO sheets, from which the hollow structure and the presence of GO were clear.
FIGURE 2
After determining the composites’ morphologies by SEM and TEM, the XRD spectra were utilized to confirm the prepared crystal components. According to the JCPDs, the peaks at (110), (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) were assigned to the standard cubic structure Cu2O (No. 03–0898) (Wang et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2007). No other peaks were detected, such as CuO and Cu cupric oxide, demonstrating the purity of the as-obtained products. There was no clear peak for GO observed in the XRD pattern, due to the small amount and low diffraction intensity. The presence of GO was confirmed by Raman and TEM. The (200) diffraction peak of the Cu2O cube was stronger than the other diffraction peaks, indicating a high proportion of (100) facets. Similar results were also confirmed for the (220) diffraction peak of the rhombic dodecahedral Cu2O nanocrystals, implying a high proportion of (110) crystal planes. Also, Raman spectroscopy was used to measure the vibrations of the sp2-hybridized carbon atoms for the confirmation of the presence of GO. Hence, it was observed from Figure 3B that the Raman spectra of the as-synthesized samples contained the D peak (1,343cm−1, disorder-activated Raman mode) and G peak (1,588 cm−1, sp2 hybridized carbon) which were assigned to GO (Yang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2009; Krishnamoorthy et al., 2012). Figure 3C shows the UV/vis spectra of the as-synthesized CC, CD, GCC, and GCD nanocrystals. Interestingly, after the introduction of GO, the absorption abilities of the GCC and GCD both increased because of the scattering effect of the GO. The inset figure was the Kubelka-Munk transformation of light energy versus energy to calculate the band gap (Yang et al., 2013a; Yang et al., 2013c; Sasca and Popa, 2013). As shown in the figure, the band gaps of the CC, CD, GCC, and GCD were approximately 1.16, 1.01, 0.79, and 0.33 eV respectively. Because of the enhanced light harvesting, slow photons, and the synergistic effect of light-harvesting and LSPR (Xiao et al., 2019), the band gaps of the hollow structures were narrower than the solid structures. After the addition of GO, the proposed band gap of the GO-Cu2O composite shifted to lower energies compared with pure Cu2O. This indicated that the addition of the GO generated an extra band that served to narrow the band gap of the Cu2O for further enhancement of the photocatalytic and bactericidal properties (Yang et al., 2015). In the FT-IR (Figure 3D), the peaks at 1,625 and 1727 cm−1 corresponded to the bending and stretching vibrations of O-H and C=O, in the COOH groups of GO sheets, respectively. Also, the C-O and -CH3 stretching peaks, and the stretching vibrations of the quinoid ring/benzenoid ring from poly(o-anisidine) were around 1,250, 1,386, 1,559, and 1,506 cm−1, respectively. Also, the Cu-O stretching vibration of the Cu2O was found at 624 cm−1. In general, the characterizations from XRD, Raman, UV/vis, and FT-IR spectroscopies confirmed the successful preparation of the nanocomposites.
FIGURE 3
The photocatalytic activities of the GO-Cu2O (50 mg) for the absorption and degradation of various organic pollutants were determined when different photocatalytic dyes (MO-10ppm, RhB-10ppm, Phenol-60ppm) were chosen to react under visible light (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S1). Figure 4 1) and (b) demonstrate the degradation curves for methyl orange (MO) using different materials under visible light irradiation. Figure 4A displays the changes in degradation for MO using GCD. It was observed from Figure 4A that after the ultrasonic mixing of the solution for 30 min, the solution was absorbed to some degree. The absorption capacity of pure CD was about 80%, which was higher than the GCD composites. The inset in Figure 4A indicated the degradation efficiency of the GCD increased as the amount of GO. When 40 mg of GO was introduced into the pure Cu2O, the corresponding composite showed the highest photocatalytic activities of near 100% within 60 min. However, further addition of GO led to a decrease in the photocatalytic activity of the composites. The possible reason was that too much GO may fully wrap the GCD to eradicate the light irradiation.
FIGURE 4
To further understand the photocatalytic process, the visible light photocatalytic experiments shown in Figures 4B–D were investigated using MO, RhB, and phenol as target dyes. As shown in Figure 4B, the curve of MO using the GCD was the lowest, whereas the best performance for degrading MO and phenol (Figures 4B, D) was the pure Cu2O cube. The efficiencies of absorption and degradation of MO, RhB, and phenol (Figures 4B–D) using the GCD composite were approximately 100%, 75%, and 5% respectively, within 120 min. While the efficiencies of MO, RhB, and phenol using GCC were 50%, 60%, and 6%. Hence, it was suggested that the GCD composite exhibited excellent photocatalytic performance for colored organic dyes. However, the performance of colorless dyes was very poor. This demonstrated that the photocatalytic effect of the GO-Cu2O nanoparticles was mainly due to the adsorption of the colored dyes instead of degradation of organic dyes, which was the limitation of the synthesized photocatalytic materials.
Using the experimental results, a possible photocatalytic mechanism was deduced. Generally, the mechanism of the GO-Cu2O catalytic activity was similar to other photocatalytic materials. The mechanism consisted of the absorption and degradation of the dyes and the absorption was greater than the degradation in the photocatalytic performance. The possible photocatalytic absorption mechanism was in large part due to the structure of the Cu2O. Due to the advantage of a hollow structure, the GCD nanocomposites had the highest absorption. In addition, GO sheets offered more active adsorption sites, which also improved the adsorption of dyes. On the other hand, the photocatalytic reaction was initiated under the irradiation of visible light, leading to the separation of electron-hole pairs in the Cu2O. The separated electrons were then excited and moved from the VB to the CB, leaving the holes in the VB. The reactive holes at VB and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated through reaction of O2 and H2O can degrade the dyes. Moreover, GO transferred electrons from the Cu2O to the GO sheets which maintained the stability of the material. However, too much GO entangled the Cu2O, especially the dodecahedral Cu2O, and prevented it from absorbing the colored dyes.
After the investigation of the photocatalytic performance of GCD, the flat colony counting method was also introduced to examine the specific bactericidal effect (Dahle et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2015; Choudhry, 2016). As shown in Figure 5, the bacterial number was calculated after the addition of GCD at 0, 24, and 48 h. Specifically, the original concentration of the pathogenic bacteria was approximately 1*107 CFU/ml. After the incubation of the bacteria for a period of 24 and 48 h without the GCD, an obvious increase was observed in the E. coli and S. typhi at 1*107.5 CFU/ml. The amount of S. aureous and P. aeruginosa remained the same. However, with the treatment of GCD at 24 h, the number of bacteria decreased from 1*107.5 to 1*104.5 CFU/ml with an antibacterial rate of more than 99.9%. After the incubation time was prolonged to 48 h, the number of the S. aureous was reduced to 1*102.5 CFU/ml, and the specific bactericidal rate for all the bacteria was summarized in Table 1. Considering the bactericidal experiment, it was concluded that the prepared GCD had a broad-spectrum antibacterial activity toward pathogenic bacteria.
FIGURE 5
TABLE 1
| Bacteria | E. coli | S. aureus | S. typhi | P. aeruginosa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bactericidal effect (%) | 99.99 | 99.999 | 99.999 | 99.9 |
The bactericidal effect of the GCD against different kinds of pathogenic bacteria.
To discuss the mechanism of the bactericidal effect, the morphological changes of E. coli and S. aureus were investigated by TEM before/after the addition of GCD. Figure 6 (a,b) showed the original E. coli rod-like structures with a size of 1 μm × 0.5 μm, while the S. aureus has a spherical structure with a diameter of 0.5 μm in the absence of GCD. However, after the treatment of samples that involved the light irradiation of the GCD, ROS was generated to interact with the membrane, making the cytoplasm flow out of the bacteria, and finally killed them. Also, other research considered that the presence of Cu ions in the GCD reacted with the oxygen to produce ROS through the Fenton reaction for further photocatalytic and bactericidal performance (Touati, 2000; El Saeed et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2020). Generally, GCD acted as a kind of bifunctional material for applications in photocatalysis and bactericide.
FIGURE 6
Conclusion
In summary, an effective in-situ synthesis to produce different morphologies of GO-Cu2O was demonstrated. After characterizing with SEM, TEM, XRD, Raman spectroscopy, UV/vis spectroscopy, and FT-IR spectroscopy, the degradation performance of Cu2O and GO-Cu2O for different dyes under visible light was measured. Antibacterial experiments were also investigated against pathogenic bacteria. The presence of GO along with the hollow structure created a synergistic effect that increased the photo harvesting and facilitated the electron transfer to generate more ROS for the enhancement of the photocatalytic and bactericidal performances. Herein, this work offers new insights into the facile synthesis of GO-based nanocomposites for the applications of photocatalytic degradation and sterilization of wastewater pollutants using visible light.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
ZS conceived of the presented idea, YY and HS carried out the experiment, JZ carried out some experiments and analyzed the data during the revision of the manuscript, XT and YL verified the analytical methods, ZJ, PW, JQ were involved in planning and supervised the work.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the National Key R and D Program of China (2020YFC2007301, 2020YFC2007300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31920103007, 82003150, 31800757, 32101153), the Shanghai International Science and Technology Cooperation Fund Project (18410722000), the Shanghai Sailing Program (20YF1453400), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M680395) and the “Chenguang Program” supported by Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (20CG25).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.755836/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AhmedS. N.HaiderW. J. N. (2018). Heterogeneous Photocatalysis and its Potential Applications in Water and Wastewater Treatment. a Rev.29 (34), 342001. 10.1088/1361-6528/aac6ea
2
ChoudhryP. (2016). High-throughput Method for Automated colony and Cell Counting by Digital Image Analysis Based on Edge Detection. PloS one11 (2), e0148469. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148469
3
DahleJ.KakarM.SteenH. B.KaalhusO. (2004). Automated Counting of Mammalian Cell Colonies by Means of a Flat Bed Scanner and Image Processing. Cytometry A: J. Int. Soc. Anal. Cytol.60 (2), 182–188. 10.1002/cyto.a.20038
4
DengS.TjoaV.FanH. M.TanH. R.SayleD. C.OlivoM.MhaisalkarS.WeiJ.SowC. H. (2012). Reduced Graphene Oxide Conjugated Cu2O Nanowire Mesocrystals for High-Performance NO2 Gas Sensor. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134 (10), 4905–4917. 10.1021/ja211683m
5
DinhC. T.YenH.KleitzF.DoT. O. (2014). Three‐Dimensional Ordered Assembly of Thin‐Shell Au/TiO2 Hollow Nanospheres for Enhanced Visible‐Light‐Driven Photocatalysis. Angew. Chem.126 (26), 6736–6741. 10.1002/ange.201400966
6
El SaeedA. M.Abd El-FattahM.AzzamA. M.DardirM. M.BaderM. M. (2016). Synthesis of Cuprous Oxide Epoxy Nanocomposite as an Environmentally Antimicrobial Coating. Int. J. Biol. Macromolecules89, 190–197. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.043
7
HongC.JinX.TotlebenJ.LohrmanJ.HarakE.SubramaniamB.ChaudhariR. V.RenS. (2014). Graphene Oxide Stabilized Cu2O for Shape Selective Nanocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A.2 (20), 7147–7151. 10.1039/c4ta00599f
8
HouC.QuanH.DuanY.ZhangQ.WangH.LiY. (2013). Facile Synthesis of Water-Dispersible Cu2O Nanocrystal-Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrid as a Promising Cancer Therapeutic Agent. Nanoscale5 (3), 1227–1232. 10.1039/c2nr32938g
9
HuaQ.ChenK.ChangS.MaY.HuangW. (2011). Crystal Plane-dependent Compositional and Structural Evolution of Uniform Cu2O Nanocrystals in Aqueous Ammonia Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. C115 (42), 20618–20627. 10.1021/jp206966f
10
HuangW.-C.LyuL.-M.YangY.-C.HuangM. H. (2012). Synthesis of Cu2O Nanocrystals from Cubic to Rhombic Dodecahedral Structures and Their Comparative Photocatalytic Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134 (2), 1261–1267. 10.1021/ja209662v
11
KhanM. E.HanT. H.KhanM. M.KarimM. R.ChoM. H. J. A. A. N. M. (2018). Environmentally Sustainable Fabrication of Ag@ G-C3n4 Nanostructures and Their. multifunctional efficacy as antibacterial agents and photocatalysts1 (6), 2912–2922. 10.1021/acsanm.8b00548
12
KhanM. E.KhanM. M.ChoM. H. (2017). Ce3+-ion, Surface Oxygen Vacancy, and Visible Light-Induced Photocatalytic Dye Degradation and Photocapacitive Performance of CeO2-Graphene Nanostructures. Sci. Rep.7 (1), 5928. 10.1038/s41598-017-06139-6
13
KhanM. E.KhanM. M.ChoM. H. J. J. O. C.sciencei. (2016). CdS-graphene Nanocomposite for Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Applications, 482, 221–232. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.07.070
14
KhanM. E.KhanM. M.ChoM. H. J. N. J. o. C. (2015). Biogenic Synthesis of a Ag–Graphene Nanocomposite with Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation. Electr. conductivity photoelectrochemical Perform.39 (10), 8121–8129. 10.1039/c5nj01320h
15
KrishnamoorthyK.VeerapandianM.MohanR.KimS.-J. (2012). Investigation of Raman and Photoluminescence Studies of Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets. Appl. Phys. A106 (3), 501–506. 10.1007/s00339-011-6720-6
16
KuoC.-H.HuangM. H. (2008). Fabrication of Truncated Rhombic Dodecahedral Cu2O Nanocages and Nanoframes by Particle Aggregation and Acidic Etching. J. Am. Chem. Soc.130 (38), 12815–12820. 10.1021/ja804625s
17
LiH.BianZ.ZhuJ.ZhangD.LiG.HuoY.LiH.LuY. (2007). Mesoporous Titania Spheres with Tunable Chamber Stucture and Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc.129 (27), 8406–8407. 10.1021/ja072191c
18
LiY.ZhuL.YangY.SongH.LouZ.GuoY.YeZ. (2015). A Full Compositional Range for a (Ga1‐x Zn x)(N1‐x O X) Nanostructure: High Efficiency for Overall Water Splitting and Optical Properties. Small11 (7), 871–876. 10.1002/smll.201401770
19
MarschallR. (2014). Photocatalysis: Semiconductor Composites: Strategies for Enhancing Charge Carrier Separation to Improve Photocatalytic Activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17/advanced Funct. Mater.24 (17), 2420. 10.1002/adfm.201470108
20
KhanM. E.KhanM. M.ChoM. H. J. R. a., Fabrication of WO 3 Nanorods on Graphene Nanosheets for Improved Visible Light-Induced Photocapacitive and Photocatalytic Performance, 6 (25) (2016) 20824–20833.10.1039/c5ra24575c
21
MetiS.RahmanM. R.AhmadM. I.BhatK. U. (2018). Chemical Free Synthesis of Graphene Oxide in the Preparation of Reduced Graphene Oxide-Zinc Oxide Nanocomposite with Improved Photocatalytic Properties. ApSS451, 67–75. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.138
22
QiJ.ZhaoK.LiG.GaoY.ZhaoH.YuR.TangZ. (2014). Multi-shelled CeO2 Hollow Microspheres as superior Photocatalysts for Water Oxidation. Nanoscale6 (8), 4072–4077. 10.1039/c3nr06822f
23
QinJ. L.LiR.LuC. Y.JiangY.TangH.YangX. F. (2015). Ag/ZnO/graphene Oxide Heterostructure for the Removal of Rhodamine B by the Synergistic Adsorption-Degradation Effects. Ceramics Int.41 (3), 4231–4237. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.046
24
SascaV.PopaA. (2013). Band-gap Energy of Heteropoly Compounds Containing Keggin Polyanion-[PVxMo12-xO40]−(3+ X) Relates to Counter-cations and Temperature Studied by UV-VIS Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy. J. Appl. Phys.114 (13), 133503. 10.1063/1.4820582
25
SchwarzenbachR. P.EgliT.HofstetterT. B.Von GuntenU.WehrliB. (2010). Global Water Pollution and Human Health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.35, 109–136. 10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125342
26
ShaoP.XuP.ZhangL.XueY.ZhaoX.LiZ.LiQ. (2019). Non-Chloride In Situ Preparation of Nano-Cuprous Oxide and its Effect on Heat Resistance and Combustion Properties of Calcium Alginate. Polymers11 (11), 1760. 10.3390/polym11111760
27
SharmaK.MaitiK.KimN. H.HuiD.LeeJ. H. (2018). Green Synthesis of Glucose-Reduced Graphene Oxide Supported Ag-Cu2O Nanocomposites for the Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. Composites B: Eng.138, 35–44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.021
28
ShenC.LiH.WenY.ZhaoF.ZhangY.WuD.LiuY.LiF. (2020). Spherical Cu2O-Fe3O4@ Chitosan Bifunctional Catalyst for Coupled Cr-Organic Complex Oxidation and Cr (VI) Capture-Reduction. Chem. Eng. J.383, 123105. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123105
29
ShiX.LouZ.ZhangP.FujitsukaM.MajimaT. (2016). 3D-Array of Au–TiO2 Yolk–Shell as Plasmonic Photocatalyst Boosting Multi-Scattering with Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter.8 (46), 31738–31745. 10.1021/acsami.6b12940
30
VaughnD. D.SchaakR. E. (2012). Hybrid CuO‐TiO2− xNx Hollow Nanocubes for Photocatalytic Conversion of CO2 into Methane under Solar Irradiation. Angew. Chem. Int. Edition51 (16), 3915–3918. 10.1002/anie.201108936
31
SunJ.GaoL.ZhangQ. (2003). Synthesizing and Comparing the Photocatalytic Properties of High Surface Area Rutile and Anatase Titania Nanoparticles. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.86 (10), 1677–1682. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03539.x
32
TouatiD. (2000). Iron and Oxidative Stress in Bacteria. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.373 (1), 1–6. 10.1006/abbi.1999.1518
33
WangQ.YangZ. (2016). Industrial Water Pollution, Water Environment Treatment, and Health Risks in China. Environ. Pollut.218, 358–365. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.011
34
WangS.GuanB. Y.LuY.LouX. W. D. (2017). Formation of Hierarchical In2S3–CdIn2S4 Heterostructured Nanotubes for Efficient and Stable Visible Light CO2 Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139 (48), 17305–17308. 10.1021/jacs.7b10733
35
WangW. Z.WangG.WangX. S.ZhanY.LiuY.ZhengC. L. (2002). Synthesis and Characterization of Cu2O Nanowires by a Novel Reduction Route. Adv. Mater.14 (1), 67–69. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020104)14:1<67::aid-adma67>3.0.co;2-z
36
WuM.JinJ.LiuJ.DengZ.LiY.DeparisO.SuB.-L. (2013). High Photocatalytic Activity Enhancement of Titania Inverse Opal Films by Slow Photon Effect Induced strong Light Absorption. J. Mater. Chem. A1 (48), 15491–15500. 10.1039/c3ta13574h
37
XiaoM.WangZ.LyuM.LuoB.WangS.LiuG.ChengH. M.WangL. (2019). Hollow Nanostructures for Photocatalysis: Advantages and Challenges. Adv. Mater.31 (38), 1801369. 10.1002/adma.201801369
38
WangX.LiaoM.ZhongY.ZhengJ. YTianW.ZhaiT. (2012), ZnO Hollow Spheres with Double‐Yolk Egg Structure for High‐Performance Photocatalysts and Photodetectors, Adv. Mater.24 (25) 3421–3425.10.1002/adma.201201139
39
YangD.VelamakanniA.BozokluG.ParkS.StollerM.PinerR. D.StankovichS.JungI.FieldD. A.VentriceC. A.Jr (2009). Chemical Analysis of Graphene Oxide Films after Heat and Chemical Treatments by X-ray Photoelectron and Micro-raman Spectroscopy. Carbon47 (1), 145–152. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.045
40
YangX. F.CuiH. Y.LiY.QinJ. L.ZhangR. X.TangH. (2013). Fabrication of Ag3PO4-Graphene Composites with Highly Efficient and Stable Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance. Acs Catal.3 (3), 363–369. 10.1021/cs3008126
41
YangX. F.LuC. Y.QinJ. L.ZhangR. X.TangH.SongH. J. (2011). A Facile One-step Hydrothermal Method to Produce Graphene-MoO3 Nanorod Bundle Composites. Mater. Lett.65 (15-16), 2341–2344. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.05.019
42
YangX. F.QinJ. L.LiY.ZhangR. X.TangH. (2013). Graphene-spindle Shaped TiO2 Mesocrystal Composites: Facile Synthesis and Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance. J. Hazard. Mater.261, 342–350. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.044
43
YangX.QinJ.JiangY.ChenK.YanX.ZhangD.LiR.TangH. (2015). Fabrication of P25/Ag3PO4/graphene Oxide Heterostructures for Enhanced Solar Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants and Bacteria. Appl. Catal. B: Environ.166-167, 231–240. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.028
44
YangX.QinJ.LiY.ZhangR.TangH. (2013). Graphene-spindle Shaped TiO2 Mesocrystal Composites: Facile Synthesis and Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance. J. Hazard. Mater.261, 342–350. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.044
45
ZhangD.YangJ.WangJ.YangJ.QiaoG. (2020). Construction of Cu2O-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites with Enhanced Photoelectric and Photocatalytic Properties. Opt. Mater.100, 109612. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109612
46
ZhangH.ZhuQ.ZhangY.WangY.ZhaoL.YuB. (2007). One‐pot Synthesis and Hierarchical Assembly of Hollow Cu2O Microspheres with Nanocrystals‐composed Porous Multishell and Their Gas‐sensing Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater.17 (15), 2766–2771. 10.1002/adfm.200601146
47
ZhangX.LiuY.LeeS.-T.YangS.KangZ. (2014). Coupling Surface Plasmon Resonance of Gold Nanoparticles with Slow-Photon-Effect of TiO2 Photonic Crystals for Synergistically Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Energ. Environ. Sci.7 (4), 1409–1419. 10.1039/c3ee43278e
Summary
Keywords
Cu2O, dodecahedra, graphene oxide, photocatalytic performance, antibacterial effect
Citation
Shan Z, Yang Y, Shi H, Zhu J, Tan X, Luan Y, Jiang Z, Wang P and Qin J (2021) Hollow Dodecahedra Graphene Oxide- Cuprous Oxide Nanocomposites With Effective Photocatalytic and Bactericidal Activity. Front. Chem. 9:755836. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.755836
Received
10 August 2021
Accepted
23 August 2021
Published
09 September 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Khalid Umar, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia
Reviewed by
Mohammad Ehtisham Khan, Yeungnam University, South Korea
Mohd. Farhan Khan, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Shan, Yang, Shi, Zhu, Tan, Luan, Jiang, Wang and Qin.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhenqi Jiang, 7520200073@bit.edu.cn; Ping Wang, pwang@sdut.edu.cn; Jieling Qin, qinjieling770@hotmail.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Nanoscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.