Abstract
Mesoporous films and electrodes were prepared from aqueous slurries of isolated anatase TiO2 nanoparticles. The resulting layers were annealed in air at temperatures 100°C ≤ T ≤ 450°C upon preservation of internal surface area, crystallite size and particle size. The impact of processing temperature on charge separation efficiency in nanoparticle electrodes was tracked via photocurrent measurements in the presence of methanol as a hole acceptor. Thermal annealing leads to an increase of the saturated photocurrent and thus of the charge separation efficiency at positive potentials. Furthermore, a shift of capacitive peaks in the cyclic voltammograms of the nanoparticle electrodes points to the modification of the energy of deep traps. Population of these traps triggers recombination possibly due to the action of local electrostatic fields attracting photogenerated holes. Consequently, photocurrents saturate at potentials, at which deep traps are mostly depopulated. Charge separation efficiency was furthermore investigated for nanoparticle films and was tracked via the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. Our observations evidence an increase of charge separation efficiency upon thermal annealing. The effect of particle consolidation, which we associate with minute atomic rearrangements at particle/particle contacts, is attributed to the energetic modification of deep traps and corresponding modifications of charge transport and recombination, respectively.
Introduction
The efficient exploitation of photogenerated charge carriers at a photocatalyst surface requires fast charge carrier transport at low recombination rates (; ; ; ; ; ). Transport, recombination as well as interfacial transfer are strongly influenced by charge carrier trapping at band gap states in surface and subsurface regions of the photocatalyst (; ). In aggregated particle systems, carrier transport (; ; ; ; ) and recombination (; ; ; ; ) are impacted furthermore by trap states at solid-solid interfaces corresponding to particle/particle contacts. On the other hand, aggregation leads to the formation of extended photocatalyst structures promoting charge carrier separation (; ; ; ; ), which is especially challenging in nanoparticle-based systems due to the absence of significant internal electric fields. The beneficial effect of nanoparticle aggregation on charge separation efficiency has been attributed to the creation of additional pathways involving interparticle charge transfer, which leads to a spatial decoupling of light absorption and interfacial charge transfer. Importantly, associated cooperative effects have been reported both for well-aligned nanocrystal superstructures and for random nanoparticle aggregates. For colloidal dispersions, related studies are complicated by aggregation-induced changes of the optical sample properties (). More specifically, particle aggregation or agglomeration may induce significant changes of the ability of colloidal dispersions to absorb and scatter impinging photons. Furthermore, a light-induced inhibition of aggregation () or even de-aggregation () of particles upon photocatalyst operation and an associated increase of the reactive surface area have been claimed. A disentanglement of different contributions (e.g., the cooperative effect in nanoparticle aggregates, changes of the optical properties, or of the active surface area) to aggregation- or agglomeration-induced changes of the photocatalytic properties of particle dispersions is therefore challenging. Indeed, depending on experimental conditions beneficial as well as detrimental effects of particle aggregation / agglomeration on photocatalytic activity have been reported (; ; ; ; ).
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
An elucidation of the impact of particle consolidation on the photoactivity therefore requires the use of suitable model systems providing invariable optical properties and constant active surface areas. For this purpose, we immobilized random anatase TiO2 nanoparticle networks from aqueous particle slurries onto uncoated glass substrates (for the preparation of nanoparticle films) or onto FTO (fluorine-doped tin oxide)—coated glass substrates (for the preparation of nanoparticle electrodes). The precursor powder used for slurry preparation was synthesized by metal organic chemical vapor synthesis (MOCVS) yielding isolated nanoparticles (). The resulting layers were dried (“pristine films / electrodes”) and annealed in air at temperatures 100°C ≤ T ≤ 450°C (“annealed films / electrodes”) pursuing different degrees of particle consolidation. We have shown in a recent study () by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and nitrogen sorption experiments that the original particle size, the crystallite domain size and the specific surface area are preserved for these layers upon thermal processing at T ≤ 450°C. However, as revealed by cyclic voltammetry and impedance spectroscopy, thermal annealing leads to a significant modification of the energetic distribution of deep trap states, which were associated with particle/particle contacts (; ). The population of these deep traps was found to strongly affect the electronic conductivity, which experiences an increase by up to five orders of magnitude (). At positive potentials, pristine as well as annealed films feature a low conductivity. However, at the onset potentials of deep trap population, the conductivity increases exponentially and reaches a saturation value as soon as all deep trap states are filled. At very negative potentials, an annealing temperature-independent conductivity was observed for all electrodes. Thermal annealing leads to a shift of the capacitive peaks associated with deep traps and thus to a shift of the onset potential of exponential conductivity increase. Correspondingly, films annealed at higher temperatures feature a higher electronic conductivity at least under experimental conditions, where deep traps are only partially populated ().
In the present study, we used these anatase TiO2 nanoparticle layers to elucidate the impact of annealing temperature on the separation efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers. As a measure for the charge separation efficiency in nanoparticle electrodes and films, respectively, we measured the photocurrent detected in the presence of methanol (a frequenly employed hole scavenger in photoelectrochemical studies) (; ; ) as well as the quantum yield for the decomposition of H2O2 (used in photocatalysis as an electron acceptor to increase the degradation rate) ().
Materials and Methods
Preparation of Nanoparticle Electrodes and Films
The anatase TiO2 nanoparticle powder was prepared by metal organic chemical vapor synthesis (MOCVS) (; ; ). Specifically, titanium (IV)isopropoxide was decomposed at T = 800°C in a hot wall reactor system. For purification, the obtained powder samples were subjected to thermal treatment under high vacuum conditions (p < 10−5 mbar). First, the powder sample was heated to T = 600°C using a rate of r ≤ 5°C min−1. Subsequent oxidation with O2 at this temperature was applied to remove organic remnants from the precursor material and to guarantee the stoichiometric composition of the oxide (; ; ). Resulting powders are characterized by a very low degree of particle aggregation thus yielding an ensemble of virtually isolated nanoparticles (). The powder (0.150 g) was ground in ultrapure water (Milipore, 18.2 MΩ cm, 1.30 ml) in the absence of any additives to avoid the adsorption of organic molecules on the high surface area material (). The slurry was spread by doctor blading onto FTO-coated glass (Pilkington TEC 8, resistance 8 Ω/□) to obtain anatase TiO2 nanoparticle electrodes (“pristine electrodes”). Subsequently, the dried layers were annealed at 100°C ≤ T ≤ 450°C for t = 1 h in air (“annealed electrodes”) yielding films with a thickness of ∼5 µm (). As the spreading of the slurry leads to unavoidable variations in the amount of immobilized oxide material, some measurements were conducted using the same electrode for a series of measurements. In these cases, the electrode was thoroughly rinsed with ultrapure water after each measurement, dried in air and annealed repeatedly at temperatures between 100 and 450°C. Importantly, for both processing / characterization approaches the same trends were observed. As confirmed in a previous study () using X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and nitrogen sorption, the crystal structure (anatase TiO2), the specific surface area (∼90 m2/g) and the nanocrystal size are preserved upon annealing of the TiO2 films at 100°C ≤ T ≤ 450°C. In-depth analysis () yields for both films a narrow particle size distribution with a median particle diameter of 14.5 ± 0.5 nm. Accordingly, observed variations in the charge separation efficiency can be attributed to annealing-induced interface formation between particles featuring invariant primary particle properties.
Cyclic Voltammetry
Cyclic voltammograms of pristine and annealed anatase TiO2 nanoparticle electrodes were recorded with a scan rate v = 0.020 V s−1 in the potential window −0.6 V ≤ EAg/AgCl ≤ + 0.6 V in N2-purged 1 M MeOH/0.1 M HClO4 aqueous solution. Perchloric acid (HClO4, 70% w/w in water) and methanol (MeOH, ≥ 99.8%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. The electrochemically accumulated charge was determined from the cathodic (i.e., negative-going) scan. For photoelectrochemical measurements the electrodes were illuminated from the electrolyte side with polychromatic light (P = 500 mW cm−2) of a 300 W Xe discharge arc lamp (LOT QuantumDesign) equipped with a water filter.
Hydrogen Peroxide Decomposition
Anatase TiO
2nanoparticle films (
A= 1.82 ± 0.05 cm
2,
m= 1.5 ± 0.2 mg) were deposited onto microscopy glass slides and were annealed at
T= 100°C and
T= 450°C in air. The mass of the oxide was determined gravimetrically. For all experiments, a freshly prepared film was immersed into a 4.0 mM H
2O
2aqueous solution (
V= 100.0 ml, Sigma Aldrich, 30 wt%, containing inhibitor). TiO
2films were photoexcited by monochromatic light (
λ= 360 nm) with an irradiance of
P= 10 mW cm
−2corresponding to ≈3.3∙10
16photons per second. For this purpose a 1000 W Xe discharge arc lamp (LOT QuantumDesign) equipped with a water filter and a 360 nm band pass filter (FWHM = 40 nm, 38% transmission) was used. Both, photogenerated electrons and holes can react with H
2O
2to form H
2O and O
2(
). To avoid thermal H
2O
2decomposition due to sample heating upon UV exposure, the reaction batch was cooled by an ice bath. In addition, the aqueous H
2O
2solution was continuously stirred to avoid concentration and temperature gradients. Blind tests were performed using blank glass substrates instead of TiO
2-covered substrates. The H
2O
2concentration of the solution (
V= 100 ml) before [C(H
2O
2) ∼ 4 mM, corresponding to a total of 2.4∙10
20H
2O
2molecules] and after the exposure to UV light was determined by KMnO
4titration (
;
). The titration consisted of
• adding 10 ml H2SO4 (Merck, for analysis EMSURE, 25%) to 25 ml of analyte (H2O2 solution),
• dilution of the acidic analyte to V = 100 ml with ultrapure water,
• titration of the analyte using 0.02 M KMnO4 solution (Merck, Titripur) as titrator
From the photon energy (Eph = 3.44 eV, corresponding to λ = 360 nm) and the light irradiance (P = 10 mW cm−2 = 6.242∙1016 eVs−1 cm−2) the incident photon flux (Φq) was calculated. The apparent quantum yield (Φ) of H2O2 decomposition on TiO2 films annealed at 100 and 450°C was calculated from the incident photon flux (Φq) and the number of H2O2 molecules decomposed upon UV exposure according to
Results and Discussion
Electrochemical Charge Accumulation
Prior to charge separation experiments, all electrodes were characterized (in the absence of UV light) by cyclic voltammetry. The results resemble observations from our previous study (). As they set the base for charge separation experiments, they will be shortly discussed in the following.
The cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of a pristine film and of films annealed at different temperatures feature—in the absence of electron acceptors in the electrolyte—capacitive currents at potentials −0.6 V < EAg/AgCl < 0.2 V (Figure 1A) in line with previous studies (; ; ; ). These currents are associated with the population and depopulation of band gap states at solid/electrolyte and solid/solid interfaces in the semiconductor film (; ). A high reversibility of electron accumulation in the mesoporous semiconductor film gives rise to a symmetrical shape of the CV as the values of cathodic and anodic currents are comparable at each electrode potential (). While the CVs of films annealed at T ≥ 100°C virtually overlap at EAg/AgCl ≤ −0.3 V and feature a symmetrical shape, significantly lower current densities as well as a distorted shape are observed in the CV of a pristine film.
FIGURE 1
All films are characterized by comparable specific surface areas and primary particle sizes [d = 14.5 nm, see Ref. ()]. Importantly, CVs of all annealed films yield comparable current densities (Figure 1A). It has been shown that for mesoporous anatase TiO2 electrodes the capacitive current densities as well as the amount of accumulated charge (as extracted from the CVs) scales with the electrochemically active surface area (). Obviously, annealing at a temperature as low as 100°C imparts to the electrodes sufficient conductivity to electrochemically address—at least at sufficiently negative potentials—the whole nanoparticle network. Correspondingly, the accumulated charge (as determined from the cathodic scan) in TiO2 electrodes annealed at 100°C ≤ T ≤ 450°C is virtually constant (Q = 2.2 ± 0.1 Cg−1, Figure 2A).
FIGURE 2
In the pristine TiO2 electrode, significantly less charge is accumulated (Q = 0.5 Cg−1). This points (at comparable primary particle sizes) to a lower electrochemically active surface area and thus to limited interparticle charge transfer. Consequently, only a minor part of the films’ internal surface area contributes to the capacitive currents. Clearly, particle/particle contacts resulting from the sole drying of immobilized colloidal particles at room temperature do not impart sufficient conductivity to pristine TiO2 electrodes. The high resistance of the resulting pristine film gives rise 1) to the distorted shape of the CV and 2) to low current densities (Figure 1A). An annealing-induced modification of particle/particle contacts at temperatures as low as 100°C, however, imparts to the films sufficient conductivity to address the entire TiO2 film by electrochemical means ().
Voltammetry is a powerful tool for studying the density of electrochemically active states in mesoporous semiconductor electrodes (; ). An in-depth analysis of the CVs of annealed electrodes allows to extract additional information on the energetic distribution of band gap states. The cathodic branches of the CVs feature in addition to an exponentially increasing current density at EAg/AgCl < −0.35 V (Figure 1A) a capacitive peak of low intensity at −0.35 V < EAg/AgCl < 0.1 V (Figure 1B). Whereas the exponential increase in current density has been assigned to the population of shallow traps located at the semiconductor/electrolyte interface (), the capacitive peaks were attributed to the population of deep trap states located at grain boundaries (; ). Upon increasing the annealing temperature of the films, these peaks are shifted towards higher potentials (from EAg/AgCl = −0.20 V for a film annealed at 150°C to EAg/AgCl = 0.05 V for a film annealed at 450°C; Figure 1B). This shift can be associated with a modification of the energy of deep traps. Thermal annealing obviously induces changes in the atomic arrangement at grain boundaries and leads to an energetic stabilization of associated deep traps, which shift deeper into the band gap upon particle consolidation. From our experimental results we can not deduce conclusively, whether thermal annealing furthermore leads to a minor decrease of the intensity of capacitive peaks associated with deep traps. Due to the overlap of different capacitive contributions (resulting from traps at the solid/electrolyte interface and at solid/solid interfaces, respectively) we were not able to resolve any significant changes.
Charge Separation Efficiency in Nanoparticle Electrodes
Photocurrents can be detected for semiconductor nanoparticle electrodes when the applied potential (Fermi level, EF, of the conducting substrate) is more positive than the potential corresponding to the conduction band edge (ECB) of the semiconductor (). For anatase TiO2 nanoparticle electrodes in 0.1 M HClO4, the position of the conduction band edge was estimated from photocurrent onset measurements in the absence of surface recombination and trapping at ECB = −0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) RE (). However, the photocurrent onset may significantly shift to more positive potentials due to electron-hole recombination, trapping of holes at surface defects and/or poor hole transfer to acceptors in solution (). The detected photocurrent is thus a direct measure of the charge carrier separation efficiency in semiconductor electrodes.
The pristine and annealed anatase TiO2 nanoparticle electrodes were used as photoanodes. After each annealing step, CVs were recorded upon exposure of the film to UV light (Figure 1C). Methanol, a frequenly employed hole scavenger in photoelectrochemical studies (; ; ), was employed to minimize surface recombination. At negative potentials (EAg/AgCl < −0.5 V), the current response of the electrodes resembles the one measured in the absence of UV light and results from capacitive dark currents (compare with Figure 1A) and the absence of significant photocurrents (Figure 1C). When scanning the electrode potential from the photocurrent onset potential towards more positive values, a linear increase of the photocurrent is observed for all annealing temperatures. At sufficiently positive potentials, a saturated photocurrent is reached (Figure 1C). Importantly, the saturated photocurrent (determined at EAg/AgCl = 0.6 V) increases almost linearly with annealing temperature in the range 100°C ≤ T ≤ 300°C and levels off at T = 400 and 450°C (Figures 1C, 2B).
Annealing temperature affects—in addition to the saturated photocurrent—also the onset of photocurrent saturation, which is observed in the potential range −0.25 V ≤ EAg/AgCl ≤ 0.10 V (Figure 1C). This potential shifts towards more positive values upon an increase of the annealing temperature from 100 to 450°C. The maximum photocurrent is attained at EAg/AgCl ≥ −0.25 V, EAg/AgCl ≥ 0.06 V and EAg/AgCl ≥ 0.10 V for a film annealed at 100, 300, or 450°C, respectively. This shift resembles the shift of the energy of deep trap states located at the grain boundaries (Figure 1B).
The separation efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers (and thus the measured photocurrent) is the result of the kinetic competition between different processes including transport, transfer and recombination of charge carriers, which depend on electrode potential and thus on trap population. To rationalize the impact of deep traps and their population state on charge separation efficiency, we summarized the experimental findings from this and from our previous study () in Scheme 1.
SCHEME 1
For all electrodes investigated, we observe that the maximum obtainable photocurrent (Scheme 1A) is reached once deep trap states are mostly depopulated (Scheme 1C) as inferred from voltammetric measurements in the dark (Scheme 1D). This points to the strong impact of the population state of deep traps (Scheme 1C) on charge carrier separation. A possible explanation for this dependency is the involvement of deep traps in charge carrier recombination. Apparently, populated deep traps act as more efficient recombination centers than empty ones (Scheme 1, bottom). The increased recombination rate possibly results from the action of local electrostatic fields resulting from an uncompensated negative charge thus attracting photogenerated holes (Scheme 1, bottom). Indeed one may envisage—especially at high trap population—an incomplete charge compensation by counter ions from solution (such as e.g., H+) (
In addition to recombination, changes in the population state of deep traps are also associated with differences in conductivity (Scheme 1B) (
The onset potential of the conductivity increase shifts positive upon increasing annealing temperature (Scheme 1B) in line with the displacement of the pair of capacitive peaks associated with deep trap states (Scheme 1D). This results—at a given electrode potential and under conditions, where deep traps are only partially populated—in a higher electronic conductivity for annealed electrodes. Consequently, photogenerated electrons are transported faster to the conductive substrate, which may explain the increase of the saturated photocurrent upon particle consolidation (Scheme 1A).
For mesoporous nanoparticle electrodes there exists typically a wide potential range where the conductivity of the semiconductor film is high enough to allow for a homogeneous charging of the electrode and thus for a homogeneous displacement of the semiconductor Fermi level with respect to the conduction band as long as the band edges are pinned (
SCHEME 2

Population of conduction band (CB) states and of grain boundary (GB) traps under photostationary conditions.
Charge Separation Efficiency in Nanoparticle Films
The beneficial effect of particle consolidation upon thermal annealing is also reflected in the photoactivity of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles immobilized on glass substrates. The apparent quantum yield for H2O2 decomposition (at λ = 360 nm) accounts for Φ = 5.1 ± 0.6% and Φ = 8.3 ± 0.9% for films annealed at 100 and 450°C, respectively (Figure 3). In the absence of the TiO2 layer, but under otherwise identical experimental conditions, the quantum yield accounts for 0.21 ± 0.04%. After 6 h of UV exposure a H2O2 conversion of 14 and 22% was observed for films annealed at 100 and 450°C, respectively. These results are fully in line with previous observations on the impact of aggregation and the associated formation of extended photocatalyst structures on charge separation (
FIGURE 3

Apparent quantum yield (Φ) for H2O2 decomposition on immobilized anatase TiO2 nanoparticle layers (TiO2 mass: m = 1.5 mg, geometrical area of the film: 1.8 cm2, glass substrate) upon UV-exposure (P = 10 mW cm−2, λ = 360 nm). Films were annealed at 100 or 450°C, respectively. The reaction batch was cooled by an ice bath. Two independent experiments using freshly prepared films were performed for each annealing temperature. Blank tests using uncovered glass substrates (i.e., in the absence of the TiO2 layer) were conducted under otherwise identical conditions. Test reagent: 4.0 mM H2O2 aqueous solution purged with N2.
General Discussion
The complementary investigation of immobilized semiconductor nanoparticle ensembles in the form of films and electrodes clearly highlights the strong impact of deep electron traps on charge separation in aggregated nanoparticle structures. By the careful choice of processing conditions (comprising the high temperature pretreatment of the nanoparticle powder at T = 600°C prior to slurry preparation, layer deposition and annealing at T ≤ 450°C), different degrees of particle consolidation can be obtained upon preservation of the structural properties of the nanoparticle films. Indeed, rather than inducing significant changes of the microstructure, such thermal processing is expected to lead to minor changes of the atomic arrangement at particle/particle contacts within the films, which we propose as the origin of the modified energetic distribution of deep trap states. Importantly, it has been shown for defect- and impurity-free TiO2 model grain boundaries that trap states at the solid/solid interface are associated with local perturbations of the electrostatic potential resulting from undercoordination of Ti sites, topological disruption and strain (
The strong impact of the population state of deep traps on the dynamic response of photoelectrodes has been elucidated previously by employing periodic light perturbation experiments (
Considering the application of nanoparticle-based functional materials, our results evidence that particle consolidation constitutes a means of manipulating the energy of deep traps and thus the (potential-dependent) probabilities for interparticle charge transfer and recombination at particle/particle contacts. From an analytical point of view, related studies highlight the suitability of electrochemical methods to characterize photocatalyst materials in situ and to contribute to a microscopic understanding of macroscopic functional properties of nanoparticle-based materials.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our results highlight the strong impact of energy and population of deep traps on charge separation efficiency and thus photoactivity of anatase TiO2 nanoparticle films. Nanoparticle consolidation upon thermal annealing leads to an energetic stabilization of deep traps. The partial population of these traps during electrode / film operation influences the branching ratio between charge separation and electron/hole recombination due to (at least) two different processes: 1) the increase of the electronic conductivity upon trap population and 2) the presence of local electrostatic fields at grain boundaries attracting photogenerated holes. Thermal annealing of nanoparticle films at temperatures as low as 100°C (and up to 450°C) favors charge separation and leads under the investigated experimental conditions to higher photocurrents and apparent quantum yields.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
KR and TB contributed to conception and design of the study. KR performed the experiments. Both authors contributed to manuscript writing, revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This project was financially supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF P28211-N36).
Acknowledgments
We thank Horst Kisch for inspiring discussions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BaiS.JiangJ.ZhangQ.XiongY. (2015). Steering Charge Kinetics in Photocatalysis: Intersection of Materials Syntheses, Characterization Techniques and Theoretical Simulations. Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 2893–2939. 10.1039/c5cs00064e
2
BergerT.AntaJ. A.Morales-FlórezV. (2012). Electrons in the Band Gap: Spectroscopic Characterization of Anatase TiO2 Nanocrystal Electrodes under Fermi Level Control. J. Phys. Chem. C116, 11444–11455. 10.1021/jp212436b
3
BergerT.DiwaldO. (2016). “Traps and Interfaces in Photocatalysis: Model Studies on TiO2 Particle Systems,” in Photocatalysis. Editors SchneiderJ.BahnemannD.YeJ.PumaG. L.DionysiouD. D. (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) Publishing).
4
BergerT.Monllor-SatocaD.JankulovskaM.Lana-VillarrealT.GómezR. (2012). The Electrochemistry of Nanostructured Titanium Dioxide Electrodes. ChemPhysChem13, 2824–2875. 10.1002/cphc.201200073
5
BergerT.SterrerM.DiwaldO.KnözingerE.PanayotovD.ThompsonT. L.et al (2005). Light-Induced Charge Separation in Anatase TiO2 Particles. J. Phys. Chem. B109, 6061–6068. 10.1021/jp0404293
6
BertoluzziL.Badia-BouL.Fabregat-SantiagoF.GimenezS.BisquertJ. (2013). Interpretation of Cyclic Voltammetry Measurements of Thin Semiconductor Films for Solar Fuel Applications. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.4, 1334–1339. 10.1021/jz400573t
7
BianZ.TachikawaT.MajimaT. (2012). Superstructure of TiO2 Crystalline Nanoparticles Yields Effective Conduction Pathways for Photogenerated Charges. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.3, 1422–1427. 10.1021/jz3005128
8
BisquertJ.Fabregat-SantiagoF.Mora-SeróI.Garcia-BelmonteG.BareaE. M.PalomaresE. (2008). A Review of Recent Results on Electrochemical Determination of the Density of Electronic States of Nanostructured Metal-Oxide Semiconductors and Organic Hole Conductors. Inorg. Chim. Acta361, 684–698. 10.1016/j.ica.2007.05.032
9
CarpO.HuismanC. L.RellerA. (2004). Photoinduced Reactivity of Titanium Dioxide. Prog. Solid State. Chem.32, 33–177. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001
10
DieboldU. (2003). The Surface Science of Titanium Dioxide. Surf. Sci. Rep.48, 53–229. 10.1016/s0167-5729(02)00100-0
11
EgertonT. (2014). Uv-absorption-the Primary Process in Photocatalysis and Some Practical Consequences. Molecules19, 18192–18214. 10.3390/molecules191118192
12
ElserM. J.BergerT.BrandhuberD.BernardiJ.DiwaldO.KnözingerE. (2006). Particles Coming Together: Electron Centers in Adjoined TiO2 Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. B110, 7605–7608. 10.1021/jp0607465
13
ElserM. J.DiwaldO. (2012). Facilitated Lattice Oxygen Depletion in Consolidated TiO2 Nanocrystal Ensembles: A Quantitative Spectroscopic O2 Adsorption Study. J. Phys. Chem. C116, 2896–2903. 10.1021/jp208707p
14
Fabregat-SantiagoF.Mora-SeróI.Garcia-BelmonteG.BisquertJ. (2003). Cyclic Voltammetry Studies of Nanoporous Semiconductors. Capacitive and Reactive Properties of Nanocrystalline TiO2 Electrodes in Aqueous Electrolyte. J. Phys. Chem. B107, 758–768. 10.1021/jp0265182
15
FriedmannD.MendiveC.BahnemannD. (2010). TiO2 for Water Treatment: Parameters Affecting the Kinetics and Mechanisms of Photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B: Environ.99, 398–406. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.05.014
16
FujishimaA.ZhangX.TrykD. (2008). TiO2 Photocatalysis and Related Surface Phenomena. Surf. Sci. Rep.63, 515–582. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001
17
HendersonM. A. (2011). A Surface Science Perspective on TiO2 Photocatalysis. Surf. Sci. Rep.66, 185–297. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2011.01.001
18
HesariM.SamburJ. B.MaoX.JungW.ChenP. (2019). Quantifying Photocurrent Loss of a Single Particle-Particle Interface in Nanostructured Photoelectrodes. Nano Lett.19, 958–962. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04188
19
HirakawaT.NosakaY. (2002). Properties of O2- and OH Formed in TiO2 Aqueous Suspensions by Photocatalytic Reaction and the Influence of H2O2 and Some Ions. Langmuir18, 3247–3254. 10.1021/la015685a
20
HuckabaC. E.KeyesF. G. (1948). The Accuracy of Estimation of Hydrogen Peroxide by Potassium Permanganate Titration. J. Am. Chem. Soc.70, 1640–1644. 10.1021/ja01184a098
21
JankulovskaM.BergerT.WongS. S.GómezR.Lana-VillarrealT. (2012). Trap States in TiO2 Films Made of Nanowires, Nanotubes or Nanoparticles: An Electrochemical Study. ChemPhysChem13, 3008–3017. 10.1002/cphc.201200072
22
JiangD.ZhaoH.JiaZ.CaoJ.JohnR. (2001). Photoelectrochemical Behaviour of Methanol Oxidation at Nanoporous TiO2 Film Electrodes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.144, 197–204. 10.1016/S1010-6030(01)00527-5
23
JiménezJ. M.BourretG. R.BergerT.McKennaK. P. (2016). Modification of Charge Trapping at Particle/Particle Interfaces by Electrochemical Hydrogen Doping of Nanocrystalline TiO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 15956–15964. 10.1021/jacs.6b08636
24
LakshminarasimhanN.KimW.ChoiW. (2008). Effect of the Agglomerated State on the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production with In Situ Agglomeration of Colloidal TiO2 Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C112, 20451–20457. 10.1021/jp808541v
25
Lana-VillarrealT.MaoY.WongS. S.GómezR. (2010). Photoelectrochemical Behaviour of Anatase Nanoporous Films: Effect of the Nanoparticle Organization. Nanoscale2, 1690–1698. 10.1039/c0nr00140f
26
LiuB.ZhaoX.YuJ.ParkinI. P.FujishimaA.NakataK. (2019). Intrinsic Intermediate gap States of TiO2 Materials and Their Roles in Charge Carrier Kinetics. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev.39, 1–57. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.02.001
27
LuoB.SongR.JingD. (2017). Particle Aggregation Behavior during Photocatalytic Ethanol Reforming Reaction and its Correlation with the Activity of H2 Production. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochemical Eng. Aspects535, 114–120. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.09.035
28
MendiveC. B.HansmannD.BredowT.BahnemannD. (2011). New Insights into the Mechanism of TiO2 Photocatalysis: Thermal Processes beyond the Electron-Hole Creation. J. Phys. Chem. C115, 19676–19685. 10.1021/jp112243q
29
MesaC. A.KafizasA.FrancàsL.PendleburyS. R.PastorE.MaY.et al (2017). Kinetics of Photoelectrochemical Oxidation of Methanol on Hematite Photoanodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 11537–11543. 10.1021/jacs.7b05184
30
Monllor-SatocaD.Lana-VillarrealT.GómezR. (2011). Effect of Surface Fluorination on the Electrochemical and Photoelectrocatalytic Properties of Nanoporous Titanium Dioxide Electrodes. Langmuir27, 15312–15321. 10.1021/la203319b
31
NishimuraN.TanikawaJ.FujiiM.KawaharaT.InoJ.AkitaT.et al (2008). A green Process for Coupling Manganese Oxides with Titanium(iv) Dioxide. Chem. Commun.30, 3564–3566. 10.1039/b803989e
32
ParkY.KimW.Monllor-SatocaD.TachikawaT.MajimaT.ChoiW. (2013). Role of Interparticle Charge Transfers in Agglomerated Photocatalyst Nanoparticles: Demonstration in Aqueous Suspension of Dye-Sensitized TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.4, 189–194. 10.1021/jz301881d
33
PellegrinoF.PellutièL.SordelloF.MineroC.OrtelE.HodoroabaV.-D.et al (2017). Influence of Agglomeration and Aggregation on the Photocatalytic Activity of TiO 2 Nanoparticles. Appl. Catal. B: Environ.216, 80–87. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.046
34
QuirkJ. A.LazarovV. K.McKennaK. P. (2019). Electronic Properties of {112} and {110} Twin Boundaries in Anatase TiO 2. Adv. Theor. Simul.2, 1900157. 10.1002/adts.201900157
35
RettenmaierK.ZicklerG. A.RedhammerG. J.AntaJ. A.BergerT. (2019). Particle Consolidation and Electron Transport in Anatase TiO2 Nanocrystal Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter.11, 39859–39874. 10.1021/acsami.9b12693
36
SchneiderJ.MatsuokaM.TakeuchiM.ZhangJ.HoriuchiY.AnpoM.et al (2014). Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chem. Rev.114, 9919–9986. 10.1021/cr5001892
37
SiedlN.ElserM. J.BernardiJ.DiwaldO. (2009). Functional Interfaces in Pure and Blended Oxide Nanoparticle Networks: Recombination versus Separation of Photogenerated Charges. J. Phys. Chem. C113, 15792–15795. 10.1021/jp906368f
38
ThompsonT. L.YatesJ. T.Jr. (2006). Surface Science Studies of the Photoactivation of TiO2New Photochemical Processes. Chem. Rev.106, 4428–4453. 10.1021/cr050172k
39
TiroshS.DittrichT.OfirA.GrinisL.ZabanA. (2006). Influence of Ordering in Porous TiO2 Layers on Electron Diffusion. J. Phys. Chem. B110, 16165–16168. 10.1021/jp063595e
40
WallaceS. K.McKennaK. P. (2014). Grain Boundary Controlled Electron Mobility in Polycrystalline Titanium Dioxide. Adv. Mater. Inter.1, 1400078. 10.1002/admi.201400078
41
WangC.-y.PagelR.DohrmannJ. K.BahnemannD. W. (2006). Antenna Mechanism and Deaggregation Concept: Novel Mechanistic Principles for Photocatalysis. Comptes Rendus Chim.9, 761–773. 10.1016/j.crci.2005.02.053
42
WangL.CaiM.SunW.HeL.ZhangX. (2018). Promoting Charge Separation in Semiconductor Nanocrystal Superstructures for Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. Adv. Mater. Inter.5, 1701694. 10.1002/admi.201701694
43
ZhangQ.CelorrioV.BradleyK.EisnerF.ChernsD.YanW.et al (2014). Density of Deep Trap States in Oriented TiO2 Nanotube Arrays. J. Phys. Chem. C118, 18207–18213. 10.1021/jp505091t
Summary
Keywords
nanoparticle films, grain boundaries, deep traps, charge separation, recombination, conductivity, photoelectrochemistry
Citation
Rettenmaier K and Berger T (2021) Impact of Nanoparticle Consolidation on Charge Separation Efficiency in Anatase TiO2 Films. Front. Chem. 9:772116. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.772116
Received
07 September 2021
Accepted
06 October 2021
Published
02 November 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Bastian Mei, University of Twente, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Radim Beranek, University of Ulm, Germany
Jonathan Zacharias Bloh, DECHEMA Forschungsinstitut (DFI), Germany
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Rettenmaier and Berger.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Thomas Berger, Thomas.Berger@plus.ac.at
This article was submitted to Electrochemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.