Abstract
Hydrogen energy is considered one of the cleanest and most promising alternatives to fossil fuel because the only combustion product is water. The development of water splitting electrocatalysts with Earth abundance, cost-efficiency, and high performance for large current density industrial applications is vital for H2 production. However, most of the reported catalysts are usually tested within relatively small current densities (< 100 mA cm−2), which is far from satisfactory for industrial applications. In this minireview, we summarize the latest progress of effective non-noble electrocatalysts for large current density hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), whose performance is comparable to that of noble metal-based catalysts. Then the design strategy of intrinsic activities and architecture design are discussed, including self-supporting electrodes to avoid the detachment of active materials, the superaerophobicity and superhydrophilicity to release H2 bubble in time, and the mechanical properties to resist destructive stress. Finally, some views on the further development of high current density HER electrocatalysts are proposed, such as scale up of the synthesis process, in situ characterization to reveal the micro mechanism, and the implementation of catalysts into practical electrolyzers for the commercial application of as-developed catalysts. This review aimed to guide HER catalyst design and make large-scale hydrogen production one step further.
Introduction
As the global fossil energy crisis and the greenhouse effect intensify, it is imperative to reduce the use of fossil fuels and explore alternative clean and sustainable energy sources (; ; ). Hydrogen energy is considered one of the cleanest and most promising alternatives to fossil fuel because the only combustion product is water (). The blueprint of the hydrogen economy envisages that hydrogen is produced by water electrolysis through intermittent electric energy sources such as solar, wind, and tidal energy, which is then converted into usable electric energy in fuel cells or burned in engines (; ). However, so far, water catalysis develops slowly in the industry due to the expensive and unsatisfactory activity of noble metal catalysts (). Although a range of non-noble metal electrocatalysts and catalyst design strategies have been developed, most have focused mainly on small current densities (<100 mA cm−2) which do not meet the requirements for commercialization (; ). For large-scale industrial hydrogen production, high current density (proton exchange membrane >1,000 mA cm−2, alkaline electrolytic cell >500 mA cm−2) and durability (>100 h) are crucial (; ). Therefore, the development of robust hydrogen evolution catalysts with high current densities and durable catalytic time for industrial large-scale hydrogen production has greatly promoted the development of laboratories to commercial application.
Typically, hydrogen and oxygen are produced from the decomposition of water by two half-reactions, the cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) (; Zhu et al., 2017). Currently, platinum group metal-based catalysts show the best HER catalytic activity, but their rarity and expensiveness hinder their large-scale applications, resulting in hydrogen production only accounting for a small fraction (about 4%) of the total hydrogen production (Zou and Zhang, 2015). Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop HER catalysts based on non-noble metals and have an outstanding activity and durable long-term stability at large current densities (; Zhang et al., 2020a). Earth-abundant transition metal-based nanomaterials are considered promising electrocatalysts due to their low cost and high catalytic performance (; Yu et al., 2021). In the past few years, a large number of promising catalysts have been explored, designed, and evaluated. However, many previous catalysts are still unsatisfactory in activity and stability, and require further research (Yang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). In addition, there are few reports on the efficient and stable operation of catalysts at industrial large current densities (). Furthermore, some other obstacles, such as the bulk preparation strategies, the wreck and detach of active materials during the catalytic process, and the accumulation and the growth of bubbles on the catalyst surface, hinder the commercial application ().
Here, we provide HER catalysts with an overview of exciting recent advances in efficient electrocatalysts with performance comparable to expensive noble metal-based catalysts. Then design strategies for the intrinsic activity and architecture design, including superaerophobicity, superhydrophilicity, and adaptability, are discussed. Finally, challenges and prospects for performance-oriented design rules that guide high-strength, durable HER electrocatalysts/electrodes at large current densities are presented.
Design Strategies
So far, many high-performance water electrolysis catalysts have been developed, but most of them are operated at small current densities (<100 mA cm−2), which is far from the industrial requirement (; ). In addition, most of these catalysts are in the powder form, and the active center may detach from the electrode when expelling violent bubbles, requiring frequent replacement of the catalytic material in actual high current density industrial production (Zhang et al., 2018; ). Even if supporting materials are developed, few catalysts have been tested at high current densities. Therefore, the development of robust catalysts with high current density is particularly important from the perspective of economic benefits and applications. ) reported a hydroxide-mediated nickel-based catalyst for high-current density HER. The h-NiMoFe catalyst is loaded on a piece of Ni foam (NF) by a two-step method, as shown in Figure 1A, which delivers an impressively good performance that the current density is 1,000 mA cm−2 at a relatively low overpotential of 98 mV. According to their detailed microstructure characterization, the strong interactions between Ni and Mo/Fe could tailor the local electronic structure of Ni, and make hydroxide surface richer than other samples. As a result, even at high current densities, the h-NiMoFe catalyst could stabilize hydroxide on its surface. Impressively, the h-NiMoFe catalyst could be prepared on a meter scale, which has the prospect of industrial application. Zhang et al. (2020b) reported a fluorine-doped cobalt–iron phosphide supported on an iron foam (IF) catalyst. This F-Co2P/Fe2P/IF catalyst shows excellent HER activity that the overpotential is only 260.5, 292.2, and 304.4 mV at large current densities of 1,000, 2000, and 3,000 mA cm−2, respectively. Yu et al. reported a hierarchically structured 3D electrode fabricated by growing amorphous, mesoporous NiFe-LDH nanosheet network on a 3D MXene/NF frame (Yu et al., (2019a). This electrode was directly used as a binder-free catalyst which delivers a high current density of 500 mA cm−2at a low overpotential of 205 mV for hydrogen evolution.
FIGURE 1
During large-scale catalytic hydrogen evolution, massive hydrogen bubbles are rapidly formed at high current densities (). Bubbles accumulate on the contact surface of the catalyst and the electrolyte, which seriously hinders the mass transfer of the liquid, slows down the electron transfer, and reduces the exposed active sites number, resulting in decreased electrocatalytic activity and stability (Yu et al., 2019b). Thus, the challenge is separating the formed H2 bubbles to maintain the catalytic capacity of the electrodes in high current density industrial hydrogen production (Yang et al., 2019). It has been reported that “superaerophobic” surface structures can be assembled by forming array structures, which are essential for high-current HER since the superaerophobic surface could release forming bubbles in time (). Since the accumulated bubbles on the surface could lead to the catalytic site blocking and the electrolyte diffusion suppression, the superhydrophilic electrodes are expected to promote the wettability between the catalyst and the aqueous electrolyte, and accelerate the separation of bubbles through superaerophobicity. For superaerophobicity, the three-phase interface of electrode–electrolyte–bubble is formed, as shown in Figure 1B (). In large current density HER, the rapidly generated bubbles usually adhere to the electrode surface in large quantities and then cluster together to form a gas film, leading to the decreased active sites and hindering the diffusion from the electrolyte to the catalyst surface. It is indispensably needed to release the gaseous products from the electrode surface in time before bubble accumulation. Therefore, making the surface dislike the gaseous products beneficial for the bubble release, the catalyst surface engineering is thus of great prospective to solve this problem. Theoretically, the release diameter of the bubbles depends on the adhesion force of the catalyst film, and the adhesion force originates from the three-phase (solid, liquid, and gas) contact line (TPCL). As displayed in the left part of Figure 1C, the TPCL is a continuous circle when the electrode is flat. Constructing nanostructured electrodes provides a rougher surface, which significantly reduces the surface solid fraction and thus cuts the TPCL into discontinuous points (Figure 1C, right). Given that each point of the TPCL has the same adhesion force to bubbles of the same material, the broken TPCL shows a smaller cumulative adhesion force relative to the continuous TPCL. Therefore, the surface roughness is a key factor that influences the TPCL and adhesion force. Note that due to the interfacial energy balance, superhydrophilic surfaces are often superaerophobic; therefore, both design principles are often used simultaneously (; ). Superhydrophilic materials are textured and/or structured materials (rough and/or porous) with a surface roughness coefficient greater than 1, on which water (liquid) diffuses completely, as shown in Figure 1F, (). Roughness enhances the diffusion of the liquid and capillary forces control the wicking of the liquid into the textured material structure. Therefore, a common practical way to fabricate super wet surfaces is by manipulating the surface texture. For example, compared to nanosheets, vertically aligned nanoarrays (Figure 1D–Figure 1E ()) can generate efficient gas escape, especially in high current densities; the three-phase (solid, liquid, and gas) contact line between the bubble and the electrode surface is in a discontinuous state, resulting in a particularly low contact area and low adhesion, similar to the microstructure of the bubble on the surface of a lotus leaf (). For instance, Zhao and coworkers prepared a WS2 moiré superlattices electrocatalyst with both superhydrophilicity and superaerophobicity, which makes the big bubble split into small ones more naturally, maintains rapid and stable contact between the electrodes and electrolyte and deterring the formation of inactive sites (Figure 1H) (). Wen and coworkers prepared a hierarchical amorphous CoMoSx electrocatalyst with both superhydrophilicity and superaerophobicity (), which requires low overpotentials of 269 mV at 500 mA cm−2 for HER. The superhydrophilicity favors the entry of the electrolyte, and the superaerophobicity could facilitate the rapid departure of bubbles which accelerates mass transfer, especially at high current densities. Yin and coworkers obtained a nanovilli Ni2P electrode with superaerophobic and superhydropholic surfaces Yin et al. (2021). They found that these two characteristics can significantly facilitate mass and electron transfer, and the performance of the nanovilli Ni2P electrode is superior to that of the smooth Ni2P nanosheet array electrode, which is in accordance with the aforementioned theory (Figure 1F). Thus, the surface architecture design is an efficient way to not only enhance the superaerophobicity and superhydrophility, which are beneficial for the H2 release, but also increase the surface area which is conducive to the exposure of active sites and accelerate the mass transfer process of the electrolyte.
In electrocatalytic processes, especially at high current densities, the tension and vibrational forces generated during bubble escape and collapse are widely regarded as important factors for poor stability (Zou et al., 2017). Therefore, high-current HER catalysts also require appropriate mechanical properties. From a machinery mechanics point of view, the gap-rich nanotubes interweave with stacked and interleaved nanosheets to form “springs” that can absorb vibrational wave energy, release rebound energy, and resist destructive stress from the surrounding environment (; ). Zhang and coworkers reported a high-current HER catalyst 2D CoOOH sheet encapsulated Ni2P into tubular arrays Zhang et al. (2020c). They used in situ bending deformation and restoration measurement to detect the effect of mechanical toughness on the performance of high-current HER catalyst. The authors applied repeated bend-restoration tests to investigate the mechanical property. As shown in Figure 2A, a single nanotube of the Ni2P–CoOOH arrays was pushed by an SEM probe. As depicted, the maximum bending angle of a single nanorod is up to 27.7°. The nanotube can then restore to its original state, indicating its excellent mechanical stability. It was revealed that the high mechanical toughness of HER electrode material can buffer the electrolyte concentration polarization, accelerate hydrogen bubble rupture, and insure the long-term stability.
FIGURE 2
In a review article, it was noted that many of the reported catalysts improve their catalytic performance by increasing the mass loading or surface area of the catalyst and that the lack of an intrinsic catalytic activity center is a major barrier to the design and preparation of good catalysts (). High intrinsic activity is a prerequisite for high-current HER catalysts, which requires structural design at the atomic scale to tune the local electronic structure (Yu et al., 2021). To enhance the intrinsic activity, various strategies have been explored, such as phase engineering (; Yao et al., 2021a), crystal facet engineering (; ), defect engineering (Ye et al., 2016; Yin et al., 2016), and polymetallic engineering (Li et al., 2021; ). Wang and coworkers reported a strategy for achieving phosphate substitution and subsequent stabilization of the crystalline phase of metastable β-NiMoO4 (Figure 2B) . According to their study, compared to the α-NiMoO4 system, P-β-NiMoO4 contains optimized electronic states originating from Ni atoms near the Fermi level, which favors charge transfer from the active Ni to the surrounding atoms. In the β-NiMoO4 system, the promotion of the Ni-3d state after phosphate substitution favors the generation of the active electronic state. As a result, the adsorbed protons can readily accept electrons to produce hydrogen atoms, thus accelerating the whole HER process on P-β-NiMoO4. Phosphate substitution is proven to be imperative for stabilizing and activating β-NiMoO4, which can effectively generate the active electronic state and promote the intrinsic HER activity. In addition, simple perovskites have proven their HER ability during the past years with inferior activity to commercial Pt/C (). Recently, Liu and coworkers used PrBa0.94Co2O5+δ (PB0.94C) as a precursor for fabricating PB0.94C-based double/simple perovskite heterostructure (PB0.94C-DSPH) for HER . Their research excludes the dominant effect of intrinsic activity for the simple perovskite phase on an outstanding performance of PB0.94C-DSPH. What is more, they prepared the catalyst by milling and calcination, which is promising for large-scale production. Another strategy is the discovery/design of new active sites with higher intrinsic activity (). Recently, Yao and coworkers reported an original 3D self-supporting graphdiyne/molybdenum oxide (GDY/MoO3) material. They introduced new intrinsic catalytic active sites (non-oxygen vacancy sites) by “sp C−O−Mo hybridization” on the interface (Figure 2F) Yao et al. (2021b). The GDY/MoO3 electrode displays excellent HER activity at high current densities, as the interfacial “sp C−O−Mo hybridization” facilitates electron transfer from GDY to MoO3, further leading to more efficient electron injection during HER (25-fold higher than MoO3) and decreasing the formation energy of oxygen vacancies.
Conclusion and Outlook
The development of HER electrocatalysts with Earth abundance, cost-efficiency, and high performance for large current density industrial applications is of vital importance for H2 production. However, most of the reported catalysts focused mainly on small current densities (< 100 mA cm−2) which do not meet the requirements for commercialization. In this review, we recapitulated the exciting recent advances of effective electrocatalysts for HER whose performance is comparable to costly noble metal-based catalysts. Then design strategies with respect to the intrinsic activity and the architecture design are discussed. Although there are many large-current catalysts that have been developed, many challenges are still urgent to be overcome. 1) First, facile and scalable synthesis routes are urgently needed for the requirement of industry scale application of HER catalysts to be met (Zhang et al., 2020d; ). Among previously reported catalysts, NiMo-based electrodes have been demonstrated as the most active HER catalysts. As mentioned in this minireview, the h-NiMoFe catalyst shows excellent activity with a meter level synthesis, having the prospect of industrial application. The P-β-NiMoO4 shows superior performance than commercial Pt/C at large current densities as well. NiMo-based catalysts are often prepared by mild conditions, hydrothermal methods usually, making them promising for large-scale applications to meet the industrial dements. 2) Second, the phase characterization of catalysts is usually operated at their stable final states; in situ monitoring the phase information in the catalytic process is very important to reveal the micro mechanism of catalytic reaction (). The mechanism of HER remains unclear and even controversial (). In alkaline electrolytes, it is still under debate whether hydrogen binding energy acts as the only activity descriptor and whether other factors are the rate-determining steps (Zhang et al., 2019; ). Since the ex situ characterization could only detect the original state and final state after catalysis, the inside change cannot be observed. Therefore, the application of in situ and operational characterization under a real electrochemical process is very important to provide experimental evidence to determine key intermediates, and thus reveal the real phase-evolve process and the reaction mechanism. 3) Third, there is still a gap between academia and industry. In the actual efficiency first industrial testing process, test environment would be different: higher temperature, pressure, and electrolyte concentration. Therefore, the vital step is the implementation of catalysts into practical electrolyzers for the commercial application of as-developed catalysts. 4) Last, the stability is one of the most important parameters to evaluate the electrocatalysts for industrial applications. In acid electrolytes, non-noble metal-based catalysts usually show inferior stabilities since they are easily reacting with H+ in acid conditions. Therefore, no metal-based catalysts may become a promising candidate when applied at high current densities.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11875230) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20210076).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BertolazziS.BrivioJ.KisA. (2011). Stretching and Breaking of Ultrathin MoS2. ACS Nano5 (5), 9703–9709. 10.1021/nn203879f
2
Cheng-FeiL.ZhaoJ-W.XieL-j.Jin-QiWu.Gao-RenLi. (). Water Adsorption and Dissociation Promoted by Co*-/NC*-Biactive Sites of Metallic Co/N-Doped Carbon Hybrids for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution. Appl. Catal. B: Environ.2021, 119463.
3
ChristianeN.StéphaneF.AlexisB.JonathanD.MarianC.JulianC.et al (2018). Improved Water Electrolysis Using Magnetic Heating of FeC–Ni Core–Shell Nanoparticles. Nat. Energ.3, 476–483.
4
ChuS.MajumdarA. (2012). Opportunities and Challenges for a Sustainable Energy Future. Nature488, 294–303. 10.1038/nature11475
5
DrelichJ.ChibowskiE. (2010). Superhydrophilic and Superwetting Surfaces: Definition and Mechanisms of Control. Langmuir26 (26), 18621–18623. 10.1021/la1039893
6
DunnS. (2002). Hydrogen Futures: toward a Sustainable Energy System. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.27, 235–264. 10.1016/s0360-3199(01)00131-8
7
FaberM. S.DziedzicR.LukowskiM. A.KaiserN. S.DingQ.JinS. (2014). High-performance Electrocatalysis Using Metallic Cobalt Pyrite (CoS₂) Micro- and Nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136 (136), 10053–10061. 10.1021/ja504099w
8
GengS.TianF.LiM.LiuY.ShengJ.YangW.et al (2021). Activating Interfacial S Sites of MoS2 Boosts Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysis. Nano Res.15 (3), 1809–1816. 10.1007/s12274-021-3755-7
9
GeorgeEasoJ.SanthoshC.GeorgeDanielS. (2017). Recent Progress in Fabricating Superaerophobic and Superaerophilic Surfaces. Adv. Mater. Inter.4, 1601088. 10.1002/admi.201601088
10
HanN.YangK. R.LuZ.LiY.XuW.GaoT.et al (2018). Nitrogen-doped Tungsten Carbide Nanoarray as an Efficient Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Water Splitting in Acid. Nat. Commun.9 (9), 924. 10.1038/s41467-018-03429-z
11
HuangB.RaoR. R.YouS.Hpone Myint Kyaw Hpone MyintK.SongY.WangY.et al(2021). Cation- and pH-dependent Hydrogen Evolution and Oxidation Reaction Kinetics. JACS Au1 (1), 1674–1687. 10.1021/jacsau.1c00281
12
JakobK.ChorkendorffI. (2019). Considerations for the Scaling-Up of Water Splitting Catalysts. Nat. Energ.4, 430–433.
13
JiaQ.LiangW.BatesM. K.ManiP.LeeW.MukerjeeS. (2015). Activity Descriptor Identification for Oxygen Reduction on Platinum-Based Bimetallic Nanoparticles: In Situ Observation of the Linear Composition-Strain-Activity Relationship. ACS Nano9 (9), 387–400. 10.1021/nn506721f
14
JiaoS.FuX.WangS.ZhaoY. (2021). Perfecting Electrocatalysts via Imperfections: towards the Large-Scale Deployment of Water Electrolysis Technology. Energ. Environ. Sci.14, 1722–1770. 10.1039/d0ee03635h
15
JingS.ZhangL.LuoL.LuJ.YinS.ShenKangP. K.et al (2018). N-doped Porous Molybdenum Carbide Nanobelts as Efficient Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Appl. Catal. B: Environ.224 (224), 533–540. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.025
16
KumarA.Bui VietQ.LeeJ.Jadhav AmolR.HwangY.KimGyuM.et al (2021). Modulating Interfacial Charge Density of NiP2–FeP2 via Coupling with Metallic Cu for Accelerating Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Energ. Lett.6, 354–363. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02498
17
LiuK.YanQ.ChenM.FanW.SunY.SuhJ.et al (2014). Elastic Properties of Chemical-Vapor-Deposited Monolayer MoS2, WS2, and Their Bilayer Heterostructures. Nano Lett.14 (14), 5097–5103. 10.1021/nl501793a
18
LiC.-F.ZhaoJ.-W.XieL.-J.WuJ.-Q.LiG.-R. (2021). Water Adsorption and Dissociation Promoted by Co*-/N-C*-Biactive Sites of Metallic Co/N-Doped Carbon Hybrids for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution. Appl. Catalysis B: Environ.282, 119463. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119463
19
LiuY.DouY.LiS.TianX.XieY.WangY.et al (2021). Synergistic Interaction of Double/Simple Perovskite Heterostructure for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction at High Current Density. Small Methods5, 2000701.
20
LuJ.YinS.ShenKangP. (2019). Carbon-Encapsulated Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Electrochem. Energ. Rev.2, 105–127. 10.1007/s41918-018-0025-9
21
LuZ.LiY.LeiX.LiuJ.SunX. (2015). Nanoarray Based “Superaerophobic” Surfaces for Gas Evolution Reaction Electrodes. Mater. Horizons2, 294–298. 10.1039/c4mh00208c
22
LuZ.ZhuW.YuX.ZhangH.LiY.SunX.et al (2014). Ultrahigh Hydrogen Evolution Performance of Under-water “Superaerophobic” MoS2 Nanostructured Electrodes. Adv. Mater.26, 2683–2687. 10.1002/adma.201304759
23
LunaDeP.HahnC.HigginsD.Jaffer ShaffiqA.Jaramillo ThomasF.Sargent EdwardH. (2019). What Would it Take for Renewably Powered Electrosynthesis to Displace Petrochemical Processes?Science364, eaav3506.
24
LuoY.TangL.KhanU.YuQ.ChengH. M.ZouX.et al (2019). Morphology and Surface Chemistry Engineering toward pH-Universal Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution at High Current Density. Nat. Commun.10 (10), 269. 10.1038/s41467-018-07792-9
25
LuoY.ZhangZ.YangF.LiJ.LiuZ.RenW.et al (2021). Stabilized Hydroxide-Mediated Nickel-Based Electrocatalysts for High-Current-Density Hydrogen Evolution in Alkaline media. Energ. Environ. Sci.14, 4610–4619. 10.1039/d1ee01487k
26
NitishG.GeorgK.Heenen HendrikH.ChanK. (2022). Improving the Intrinsic Activity of Electrocatalysts for Sustainable Energy Conversion: where Are We and where Can We Go?Chem. Sci.13, 14–26.
27
QianG.ChenJ.YuT.LuoL.YinS. (2021). N-doped Graphene-Decorated NiCo Alloy Coupled with Mesoporous NiCoMoO Nano-Sheet Heterojunction for Enhanced Water Electrolysis Activity at High Current Density. Nanomicro Lett.13 (13), 77. 10.1007/s40820-021-00607-5
28
QianG.ChenJ.LuoL.YuT.WangY.JiangW.et al (2020). Industrially Promising Nanowire Heterostructure Catalyst for Enhancing Overall Water Splitting at Large Current Density. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng.8, 12063–12071. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03263
29
SenX.LiuZ.MaC.Hui-MingC.RenW. (2020). A Highly Active and Durable Electrocatalyst for Large Current Density Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Sci. Bull.65, 123–130.
30
ShanX.LiuJ.MuH.XiaoY.MeiB.LiuW.et al (2020). An Engineered Superhydrophilic/Superaerophobic Electrocatalyst Composed of the Supported CoMoSx Chalcogel for Overall Water Splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.59 (59), 1659–1665. 10.1002/anie.201911617
31
SongM.ChenD.YangY.XiangM.ZhuQ.ZhaoH.et al (2021). Crystal Facet Engineering of Single‐Crystalline TiC Nanocubes for Improved Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater.31, 2008028.
32
SunH.YanZ.LiuF.XuW.ChengF.ChenJ. (2020). Self-Supported Transition-Metal-Based Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution. Adv. Mater.32 (32), e1806326. 10.1002/adma.201806326
33
TasneemA.AbbasiS. A. (2011). ‘Renewable’ Hydrogen: Prospects and Challenges. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.15, 3034–3040.
34
TranP. D.TranT. V.OrioM.TorelliS.TruongQ. D.NayukiK.et al (2016). Coordination Polymer Structure and Revisited Hydrogen Evolution Catalytic Mechanism for Amorphous Molybdenum Sulfide. Nat. Mater.15 (15), 640–646. 10.1038/nmat4588
35
WangJ.ZhangZ.SongH.ZhangB.JiaL.XuxiaS.et al (2021). Water Dissociation Kinetic-Oriented Design of Nickel Sulfides via Tailored Dual Sites for Efficient Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Funct. Mater.31, 2008578.
36
WangZ.ChenJ.SongE.WangN.DongJ.ZhangX.et al (2021). Manipulation on Active Electronic States of Metastable Phase β-NiMoO4 for Large Current Density Hydrogen Evolution. Nat. Commun.12 (12), 5960. 10.1038/s41467-021-26256-1
37
WangZ.XiaoB.LinZ.XuY.YanL.MengF.et al (2021). PtSe2/Pt Heterointerface with Reduced Coordination for Boosted Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Angew. Chem.133, 23576–23581. 10.1002/ange.202110335
38
WenX.GuanJ. (2019). Recent Progress on MOF-Derived Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Appl. Mater. Today16 (16), 146–168. 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.05.013
39
WuH.ChuanqiF.ZhangL.ZhangJ.Wilkinson DavidP. (2021). Non-noble Metal Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Water Electrolysis. Electrochem. Energ. Rev.4, 473–507. 10.1007/s41918-020-00086-z
40
XieL.WangL.ZhaoW.LiuS.HuangW.ZhaoQ. (2021). WS2 Moiré Superlattices Derived from Mechanical Flexibility for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Nat. Commun.12 (12), 5070. 10.1038/s41467-021-25381-1
41
XuX.ChenY.ZhouW.ZhuZ.SuC.LiuM.et al (2016). A Perovskite Electrocatalyst for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater.28 (28), 6442–6448. 10.1002/adma.201600005
42
XuY.WangC.HuangY.FuJ. (2021). Recent Advances in Electrocatalysts for Neutral and Large-Current-Density Water Electrolysis. Nano Energy80, 105545.
43
XiY.ChenW.DongW.FanZ.WangK.ShenY.et al (2021). Engineering an Interfacial Facet of S-Scheme Heterojunction for Improved Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Modulating the Internal Electric Field. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter.13, 39491–39500.
44
YangH.MatthiasD.Menezes PrashanthW. (2021). Self-Supported Electrocatalysts for Practical Water Electrolysis. Adv. Energ. Mater.11, 2102074.
45
YangJ.MohmadA. R.WangY.FullonR.SongX.ZhaoF.et al (2019). Ultrahigh-current-density Niobium Disulfide Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution. Nat. Mater.18 (18), 1309–1314. 10.1038/s41563-019-0463-8
46
YaoN.MengR.SuJ.FanZ.ZhaoP.LuoW. (2021). Dual-phase Engineering of Mon/Co4N with Tailored Electronic Structure for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution. Chem. Eng. J.421, 127757.
47
YaoY.ZhuY.PanC.WangC.HuS.XiaoW.et al (2021). Interfacial Sp C-O-Mo Hybridization Originated High-Current Density Hydrogen Evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143 (143), 8720–8730. 10.1021/jacs.1c02831
48
YeG.GongY.LinJ.LiB.HeY.PantelidesS. T.et al (2016). Defects Engineered Monolayer MoS2 for Improved Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Nano Lett.16 (16), 1097–1103. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04331
49
YinY.HanJ.ZhangY.ZhangX.XuP.YuanQ.et al (2016). Contributions of Phase, Sulfur Vacancies, and Edges to the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalytic Activity of Porous Molybdenum Disulfide Nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138 (138), 7965–7972. 10.1021/jacs.6b03714
50
YinY.TanY.QiuyuanW.ZhangS.WuS.HuangQ.et al (2021). Nanovilli Electrode Boosts Hydrogen Evolution: A Surface with Superaerophobicity and Superhydrophilicity. Nano Res.14, 961–968. 10.1007/s12274-020-3133-x
51
YuL.ZhuQ.SongS.McElhennyB.WangD.WuC.et al (2019). Non-noble Metal-Nitride Based Electrocatalysts for High-Performance Alkaline Seawater Electrolysis. Nat. Commun.10 (10), 5106. 10.1038/s41467-019-13092-7
52
YuM.WangZ.LiuJ.SunF.YangP.QiuJ. (2019). A Hierarchically Porous and Hydrophilic 3D Nickel-iron/MXene Electrode for Accelerating Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution at High Current Densities. Nano Energy63 (63), 103880. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103880
53
YuQ.ZhangZ.QiuS.LuoY.LiuZ.YangF.et al (2021). A Ta-TaS2 Monolith Catalyst with Robust and Metallic Interface for superior Hydrogen Evolution. Nat. Commun.12 (12), 6051. 10.1038/s41467-021-26315-7
54
ZhangB.WangJ.JiaL.ZhangL.WanH.LingM.et al (2019). Dual-Descriptor Tailoring: The Hydroxyl Adsorption Energy-dependent Hydrogen Evolution Kinetics of High-Valance State Doped Ni3N in Alkaline Media. ACS Catal.9, 9332–9338. 10.1021/acscatal.9b01637
55
ZhangB.ZhangL.TanQ.WangJ.JiaL.WanH.et al (2020). Simultaneous Interfacial Chemistry and Inner Helmholtz Plane Regulation for superior Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution. Energ. Environ. Sci.13, 3007–3013. 10.1039/d0ee02020f
56
ZhangC.LuoY.TanJ.YuQ.YangF.ZhangZ.et al (2020). High-throughput Production of Cheap mineral-based Two-Dimensional Electrocatalysts for High-Current-Density Hydrogen Evolution. Nat. Commun.11 (11), 3724. 10.1038/s41467-020-17121-8
57
ZhangL.LuJ.YinS.LuoL.JingS.BrouzgouA.et al (2018). One-pot Synthesized boron-doped RhFe alloy with Enhanced Catalytic Performance for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Appl. Catal. B: Environ.230, 58–64. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.034
58
ZhangS.WangW.HuF.YanM.WangS.LiuY.et al (2020). 2D CoOOH Sheet-Encapsulated Ni2P into Tubular Arrays Realizing 1000 mA Cm−2-Level-Current-Density Hydrogen Evolution over 100 H in Neutral Water. Nano-Micro Lett.12, 140. 10.1007/s40820-020-00476-4
59
ZhangX.-Y.ZhuY.-R.ChenY.DouS.-Y.ChenX.-Y.DongB.et al (2020). Hydrogen Evolution under Large-Current-Density Based on Fluorine-Doped Cobalt-Iron Phosphides. Chem. Eng. J.399 (399), 125831. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125831
60
ZhangX. Y. Y. W. L.ZhaoJ.DongB.Chen-GuangL.Yong-MingC. (2021). Recent Development on Self-Supported Transition Metal-Based Catalysts for Water Electrolysis at Large Current Density. Appl. Mater. Today22, 100913.
61
ZhuPeiY. P.GuoC.ZhengY.QiaoS. Z. (2017). Surface and Interface Engineering of Noble-Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Efficient Energy Conversion Processes. Acc. Chem. Res.50 (50), 915–923. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00635
62
Zi-YouY.DuanY.Xing-YuF.YuX.GaoM.Shu-HongYu. (2021). Clean and Affordable Hydrogen Fuel from Alkaline Water Splitting: Past, Recent Progress, and Future Prospects. Adv. Mater.33, 2007100.
63
ZouX.LiuY.LiG. D.WuY.LiuD. P.LiW.et al (2017). Ultrafast Formation of Amorphous Bimetallic Hydroxide Films on 3D Conductive Sulfide Nanoarrays for Large-Current-Density Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater.29 (29), 1700404. 10.1002/adma.201700404
64
ZouX.ZhangY. (2015). Noble Metal-free Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts for Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev.44 (44), 5148–5180. 10.1039/c4cs00448e
Summary
Keywords
electrochemical hydrogen evolution, electrochemical catalyst, hydrogen evolution reaction, intrinsic activity, architecture design
Citation
Zhang L, Shi Z, Lin Y, Chong F and Qi Y (2022) Design Strategies for Large Current Density Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Front. Chem. 10:866415. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.866415
Received
31 January 2022
Accepted
21 February 2022
Published
08 April 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Lin Lv, Hubei University, China
Reviewed by
Lingling Zhai, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
Xiang Peng, Wuhan Institute of Technology, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Zhang, Shi, Lin, Chong and Qi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lishang Zhang, ztaiyang1@163.com
This article was submitted to Electrochemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.